In the case of Videogames and screens in general it goes deeper: - Screens (and videogames!) are built specifically for human cones and rods, so to animals the colors and contrast probably looks off. - The framerate is also tailored for us, so it could be even harder to interpret as motion for some animals. - Since colors are tailored to our visual system, there could be missing information in the form of wavelength that we don't see and thus we don't care about (so the TV can't reproduce them). That said, when catching a glimpse of something VERY recognizable to them, some will understand the idea and start paying more attention until they get it. This doesn't mean they see the same as we do though, but shapes should be recognizable.

I love this! You are so funny, I’m dying laughing. I’m in awe like it’s Sesame Street for intellectuals. You make my inner child so happy 🎉

TREE 3 is defined in a different fast growing hiarchy set, a different symbol far from Grahams number. This is the difference.

Thank you ❤🕯☆🪽

I thought you were not making videos anymore. Glad to see you back!

isn’t every paradox NOT a paradox if you have more understanding of math and probability?

5:11 my android phone wake up in 1 sec. Thank you for heart attack...

I'm real and all of you are fake

Tree(4)

Plus 1

Nothing WITH MASS can go faster than light. The shadow is the absence of light, get it?

And the only way to calculate tree 3 is with the same arrow notation for graham’s number. And it’s going to be g(g64 times) for the fast growing hierarchy phi 1. This number is unbelievably large and I got this idea from the number blocks number size comparison. And the next thing you need to do is teterate the fast growing hierarchy phi 1 by itself and then this number is called fast growing hierarchy phi phi 1. Or you need to use pentation that number with 187 thousand and 987. And eventually you can get a number closer to tree three.

Herderpbilion 10^10^25,000,000,000 herderpmilion 10^10^25,000,000

Asinine question

Its just you! Everyone else is an npc. Yeah, YOU!

Infinity isnt number Its definition

What is death then ?

And how do we not freak out ??

12:50 12:51 12:52 12:52 12:52 12:52 12:53 12:53 12:53 12:54 12:54 12:54 12:54 12:55 12:55 12:55 12:56 12:56 12:56 12:56 12:57 12:57 12:57 12:57 12:58 12:58 12:58 12:58 12:59 12:59 12:59 12:59 13:00 13:00 13:00 13:00 13:01 13:01 13:01 13:01 13:02 13:02 13:02 13:02 13:03 13:03 13:04 13:04 13:04 13:05 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

12:50 12:51 12:52 12:52 12:52 12:52 12:53 12:53 12:53 12:54 12:54 12:54 12:54 12:55 12:55 12:55 12:56 12:56 12:56 12:56 12:57 12:57 12:57 12:57 12:58 12:58 12:58 12:58 12:59 12:59 12:59 12:59 13:00 13:00 13:00 13:00 13:01 13:01 13:01 13:01 13:02 13:02 13:02 13:02 13:03 13:03 13:04 13:04 13:04 13:05 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

so happy you're back brother مرحبااا

Who's here in 2024?!?

When I was in 5th grade a friend challenged me to come up with a bigger number than his. I wrote down, whatever your number is + 1.

Actually Largest Numbers are TREE(3) or RAYO’s Number or ∞ or Ω

I don’t why this channel does not have more subs.

the real paradox is that i can find an example that doesn't involve the number 23 :)

Who all are here after "X" post

Loaders number is actually the largest computable number

Loaders number=D⁵(99)

Permutations of solution of a rubix cube of size TREE(3) * TREE(3)

4:00 Also; who knows, you might be able to beat googol, with the number of all elementary particles (protons, neutrons, electrons, photons, Higgs bosons, dark matter particles (whatever those are), etc.), in the observable Universe. Or even just atoms, in the *_WHOLE_* Universe. 🤔

Shut up

Then there is TREE(4), which is so big, you could say its about TREE(4) times bigger than TREE(3)

If you were able to go back in time, wouldn't the earth, sun and galaxy be in a different position in the universe? Wouldn't you just end up in space?

This message is for future time travelers. I don't want to just disappear into a black hole like last time, so I just wanted to let you know that this channel is on hiatus while I have a rethink of the kind of content I'd like to put on here. hopefully it's going to be shorter than the last one. Thank you for watching my videos!

The idea that you could be split in fundamental particles across millions of different universes might explain quantum particle genesis. 🤔

I am so happy to see you back!

We have evolved many filters to keep our perceptions of the world organised. Without the filters we would perceive every tiny detail of sensory input. Thus, actual reality is like deafening roar and white noise, blinding visual overload and freezing cold. Everything would be overwhelming, rather like the sensations of some people when they come out of a near-death experience and their brain filters aren't working yet. It's probably a bit like our perception of reality at birth before the infant brain sorts out some rudimentary filters.

Maybe you should go back to your old thumbnail style it got more views

Just realized you’re back. Thank you so much. Honestly never thought I would see a video from you again. I had to go and re watch old videos. Keep it up!!

So good to see you are making videos again! I still rewatch “what if we never travel faster than light” every now and again. Hope to see more!

Ooh Sharkee , where were you man ! been following you for yours , I was sad that you are not coming back , even I followed you on patreon for years trying to support any contact you will make , it's really awesome to see you back

Graham's number plus one. Or how about, Graham's number to the power of Graham's number times a googolplex, factorial, times Rayo's number...plus one. You can play this game all day and it is absolutely meaningless. Nice try. And don't you dare say Tree(3) is bigger. I haven't seen one mathematical proof that convinces me.

consciousness as product of brain activity is an assumption, brain cells and any cells is an assumption, even brain is an assumption, did you experience your brain? i did not. same with particles, universe and so on. it's all just flimsy concepts or narratives, like "i live in society on the planet earth" when in direct experience there's no societies and no planets at all) Measuring consciousness is a fucking joke. It stays a mystery to itself, and assumption that stupid bald monkeys can MEASURE they don't know what exactly they measure, is just so fucking fun) Even that consciousness exist is an assumption, since no one ever experienced it) This is just a concept, assumption like everything else

HE’S BACK! We’ve missed you

SHARKEE'S BACK!!!!!!

What. He’s back?

How about D^Loader(Loader)?

Excellent!!! Welcome back

Return of the king!