If there is one thing you are wrong about it's that. The V-280 and the V-22 can fly on one engine since both are connected to each other so that if one fails the other can compensate.

@@Predator42ID You point is well taken, thank you; by the by, "I looked it up", and you are correct, this time. 🤣🤣🤣

If you want the "one thing" that these tiltrotors can't do that a classic rotor aircraft can: autorotate. Total engine failure in a Blackhawk still comes with the hope of a controlled landing, even if it's still a hard one. A tiltrotor in hover mode with no forward speed? forget it. You fall out of the sky.

@@jadefalcon001 Cracks knuckles. Lady's and Gentlemen I give you the most overuse used term in the aviation media. Created by those who know nothing of what they are talking about but instead of being mean I'll be teaching. Allow me to explain. Auto rotation works by using rotors like a parachute this can be done with either helicopters or Tiltrotors. However in order for Auto rotation to work you need two things. Altitude of at least 100Feet and speed. Now according to pilots and engineers Auto rotation only works if all the parts like the gearbox, rotor shaft and even tail rotor are still functional. Loose those and your odds of survival drop. Now according to a US Naval aviator. Autor rotation has never once been used in combat by the US since it's use of helicopters. The reason being is said pilots often operate at high speed at an altitude of around 50FT or less to avoid radar. Also bullets, cannons, missiles, rockets. All these things tend to hit the airframe causing damage making Auto rotation a further problem as well as the larger the chopper the harder for said system to work in general. Now is Auto rotation train and used, yes, but pilots still call it a controlled crash. Hence why helicopters in general have a crash rate of 9.85. While Tiltrotors have a crash rate of 3.45 making tiltrotors more reliable and safer then even fixed wing planes which are at 5.3. Source USAF and USMC. Thank you and have a good Sunday.

@Predator42ID Thanks a lot for providing those details!

It's a lot safer than the osprey since it doesn't have the center gear box, which caused most crashes. They actually have a civilian version of this that is going through type certification now.

You need to watch the part at 8:01 again.

What are you talking about? All the new technological breakthroughs have a checkered past. Even the Black Hawk before it reached full maturity was known as the “Crash Hawk” In the process of real world training and pilot error things are going to happen.

they are 4 years ahead than powerpoint "conceptual phase" proposed actually by GCAP, would you compare Bea systems to Airbus and Dassault about building top notch aircraft? or leonardo to Thales about electronics? lol

You're right to point out that the program faces financial and political challenges, especially with the upcoming Strategic Defence Review. We’ll have to wait and see how things develop.

The new labour government has made strong statements that it is very much behind this project. Also, because of the international partnerships involved, I think it would be very hard to backout of with out a lot of damaging fallout. Britain needs to update the RAF, and buying American comes with strings attached. For all these reasons I very much hope to see the GCAP flying one day.

Pakistan?

@@m84as17 china give pakistan 5 gen fighters in next 2 years because china want strech Indian military resources into two fronts and achieve his military goals easily so I don't think he drop his plan in next 30 years and definitely give pakistan 6 gen. In future too...🌴🌴

Russia is said to also be selling their 5th gen jet to India​@@veersingh55555

Haha 😂😂 chinese r 5 gen 6th gen haha😅😅 they places canard evn baseline jet can detect thm