Thanks Dr for "reminding" modern "minds" of our predecessors' brilliant " minds.
@DavidHughes-hv7rl3 күн бұрын
Thank you soo much
@MethupaNanayakkara3 күн бұрын
Thanks so much for the effort ❤
@UmmAmani20124 күн бұрын
The Quran DOES NOT say Arabs are chosen by God. There are no chosen people! We are judged based in our deeds- not our race or tribe.
@Original_meme_find5 күн бұрын
What a misinformation is going on in here
@Original_meme_find5 күн бұрын
So if you do not know just learn or do not give misinformation quran never stated that arabs are chosen ones islam came to all kind nomatter color or background. They want muslims to seperate so that europeans do not want us to unite and keep middle east in somekind of wars all the time
@scottmccullough42677 күн бұрын
C’mon people all you got to do is observe a ship sail ( or motor ) directly away from you, the very top is the last part you see, believe your own eyes!!!!
@kiki4everblessed811 күн бұрын
Thank you
@Islamak1312 күн бұрын
ما شاء الله Thank you!
@RedLav-y5c14 күн бұрын
Black people here in the United States are aboriginals, Hebrews, native. Wtfn nerves!
@a-guess-at-the-riddle14 күн бұрын
Someone should make a channel that takes the short illustrated form used in this lecture and apply it to all food-from-scratch processes that only include the defining features.
@ww2collecting88115 күн бұрын
I stumbled across an art piece from Mopope in the basement of my grandfather’s home near Ft.Cobb. Trying to learn more about this kind of art and how to preserve it.
@EddieBrock-k5h16 күн бұрын
please can you tell me how you edit the video from which app??
@CynthiaSmith-ek1eb16 күн бұрын
Doth❤
@kashyap-ke6ng25 күн бұрын
Great video❤
@Korimmmm29 күн бұрын
Very easy to understand presentation. Heartfelt thanks to the professor ❤.
@alijoueizadeh2896Ай бұрын
Thank you.
@noorsehar5305Ай бұрын
This is the most simplest and clear explanation ofc with the help of superb visuals ❤
@AbdulbasitAkolKurАй бұрын
Good information
@blackishsheep9156Ай бұрын
He sounds like Roger from American Dad lol
@tylermills-sm9nbАй бұрын
You have a right to your own values of good in the pursuit of happiness. This is what I imagine that Jefferson meant.
@tylermills-sm9nbАй бұрын
Great lecture, thank you Dr. Harper.
@tylermills-sm9nbАй бұрын
After my dad had passed, my family spread his ashes in the garden, and we ate the produce in the form of tomatoes. The ritual could be interpreted as a form of cannibalism, second-hand, and negatively, but it reflects Christian values in the form of Thanksgiving, which respects the cyclic nature of life & death. Its done in a spirit of respect & reverence for the hereafter. It reflects Jesus' parable in John 12:24: "Truly, truly, unless a grain of wheat falls into the Earth, it remains only a seed, and abides alone, but if it falls on good ground, it bears much fruit." I paraphrase, but Jesus spoke in harvest parables, common to the age, and for relative understanding of his deeper meaning. In Mathew, Jesus spoke, "I will open my mouth in parables, I will utter things hidden since the creation of the world." In his, "Parable of the Net," "Every teacher of the law who has become a disciple in the kingdom of heaven is like the owner of a house who brings forth out of his storeroom new treasures as well as old." So, from ancient letters, "Once again, the kingdom of heaven is like a net that was cast down into the lake and caught all kinds of fish. When it was full, the fisherman separated the good from the bad, like the end of an age, where the angels choose the righteous from the wicked so they may shine in the kingdom of the father, and cast the wicked into a place of unrest & gnashing of teeth." The parable of Jesus are so relatable because he centers on the peoples sources of life and how they maintain their life with material produce, annually. His ideas are never far from the sources of material life and how it is maintained so its grounded in naturalism. His ideas of harvest, abundance, and the laws of heaven, nature, or god, and his ideas of good & evil can be ambiguous to decide without appreciating his points on fruitless versus fruitful enterprise. His ideas of fruitful being equated to eudaimonia and his fruitless to hades from the Greek perspective. His Sowers are allocated a measure of return in accordance to the law of ages, where time is experienced in cycles of abundance or poverty according to one's agreement with the virtues of human telos. The thought completes the ideas of human relativism, perception, and values in the climb to discover what is truly fruitful versus fruitless in human life.
@tylermills-sm9nbАй бұрын
Great lecture, thank you Dr. Harper.
@upkevingtonАй бұрын
New book: “Promise and Hope: Good News of God’s Anointed One” 2024 Believe, act, share
In my opinion, everyone deserves equal opportunity to go to college, but it should be trusted to the individual to decide its worth in their life. Maybe people would be more inspired to go if it were more affordable or more stories of success were advertised showing personal achievement & fulfilment with a college education. I think the equal opportunity to pursue a higher education (undergrad & grad) should be present, but acceptance into selective institutions (or programs) should be based in an applicant's overall readiness, which should reflect in the students grades or other measures of the meritocracy.
@tylermills-sm9nbАй бұрын
What's not fair in this case is the parents harmful attitude toward their own kids, predicated on conditional affection and respect, which will set a psychological precedent in their attitudes toward themselves and others in their future relationships outside the home, culminating into likely success or failure (happiness or unhappiness) based in personal attitudes and fundamental beliefs. Distributive justice was primarily unfair in its allocation of parents (ideally mature adults with a sense of natural compassion for their offspring.) in this case, rather than the children's objective differences. which is a matter of personal preference. A meritocracy based in Rawl's difference principle is unjust because its logic is exclusive, and ignores the productive potential of natural differences, in which evolution produces its most unique & transformative gifts. The boys should be treated with alternative strategies of care given their individual differences to increase equally their likelihood of success (whatever that means to the parents and their society, happiness being the universal idea.). If all were treated with a fair amount of compassionate dignity for the fact of being alive, the human race wouldn't need so many institutions to correct its arrogance.
@tylermills-sm9nbАй бұрын
I agree with the promotion of patriotic unity in the American education system, but by the use of a liberal arts education, and not by brainwashing generations for servile obedience to the American state, or American patriotic icons. In my opinion, America should want a population of critical-thinkers with a capacity to make politically important decisions from their trained reason. I could be wrong, but I think this can be done, systematically, with a humanities education, particularly a classical education in the Western tradition.
@tylermills-sm9nbАй бұрын
Marginal Utility, very profound.
@tylermills-sm9nbАй бұрын
It's still a very complicated & interesting case. If I were the doctor, I could test my 'reprobate theory' by offering the dire facts to the 'healthy sinner' in favor of the 'unhealthy saints,' once the 'reprobate' is conscious. Then the transaction would be honest, and perhaps, the reprobate could prove the doctor's opinion wrong by offering healthy organs to save a life. Reprobates, or those with a socially harmful degree of self interest, are created early in life, and usually by neglect coming from institutions of trust, so, I suspect they are no less worthy of equal care than the civil personalities in this case, who, were likely more fortunate than the uncivil, and should be given equal chance at a higher quality of life through social rehabilitation, where trust can be re-established. I think of Dr. Mudd's treatment of John Wilkes Booth in this case, where, Dr. Mudd, could have denied Booth treatment if he indeed recognized him as Lincoln's assassin, but he didn't because it would defy his precepts, and it is reported that Dr. Mudd didn't recognize Boothe despite their former acquaintance, but regardless if he did recognize him or not, it should be legally & morally assumed that the professional, Dr. Mudd, honored his professional integrity by treating this human being as a human being, and not as a reprobate before the law, or his professional integrity would become reprobate. Despite the cost of Dr. Mudd's professional integrity by the state's rampage for vengeance, he still performed medical miracles at Fort Jefferson by continually honoring the precepts of his art. History shows that Institutions like law & medicine & their personnel should always live up to their precepts when dealing with conditional matters, or they begin to depreciate their trustworthiness, and become more purely self interested. Mudd could have denied Booth treatment to save himself from a vengeful state, but he didn't, because it would betray his fundamental beliefs in true goodness, and that's the benevolence & altruism he represents, the constitution of his art.
@tylermills-sm9nbАй бұрын
In my opinion, It wouldn't be right, because the doctor would practically subvert his own ideas of morality in the action, which I'm sure include honesty and non-theft, and he would also involve the innocent (or seemingly innocent) moral person's in his deception, so he would then be no better than the individual he considers morally reprehensible.
@tylermills-sm9nbАй бұрын
Interesting, thank you for your content, U.O.. Your lectures are very helpful for my studies.
@tylermills-sm9nbАй бұрын
Great episode!
@khondwanibanda5537Ай бұрын
Very underrated channel this one is. I have learnt a lot.
@tylermills-sm9nb2 ай бұрын
Thank you, Dr. Harper. I love your series. I feel like I struck gold for my studies ✨️.
@Posteo19832 ай бұрын
No dicen nada , al final. Puras definiciones.
@tylermills-sm9nb2 ай бұрын
Amazing, truly. Thank you so much for sharing!
@AlexysLoyal04902 ай бұрын
What about week 2 I'm between 12 to 14 days feeling warmth and things going on too
@tylermills-sm9nb2 ай бұрын
Love these, thank you.
@mskristina43142 ай бұрын
Thanks
@MennaWaleed-dm9sz2 ай бұрын
Amazing
@carmenfernandez53962 ай бұрын
Thanks for the classes. I would like to ask where the documentary mentioned in this video class is or what the title is to search for it. Thanks!
@ericpratt9842 ай бұрын
And now 9 years later, this video is controversial somehow
@connorkrilow92202 ай бұрын
Waheeguru Ji
@huukaking892 ай бұрын
Riot broke out on 1919 because of the manifesto of anti zionism came out. When the First Palestinian Congress of February 1919 issued its anti-Zionist manifesto rejecting Zionist immigration, it extended a welcome to those Jews "among us who have been Arabicized, who have been living in our province since before the war; they are as we are, and their loyalties are our own."
@SazzleFTW2 ай бұрын
English class 😭
@R.Rinnie8852 ай бұрын
you sound like mabel from gravity falls
@ponnaga5502 ай бұрын
Belfor declaration is devilish divisive should be held invalid &original philistine land be restored to philistinians, that's the final solution