Essence of Analysis: Real Numbers
10:26
Solving the logistic equation
7:16
a mysterious complex formula
5:48
a mathematically stunning formula
6:46
logarithm of a matrix
4:38
Жыл бұрын
a geometric AM-GM derivation
4:56
Sum of arctan three ways
7:43
Жыл бұрын
COOL Dirichlet Integral 😎
10:33
incredible sin sin sum
2:49
Жыл бұрын
2 to a matrix
6:56
Жыл бұрын
Quantum Integral
9:43
Жыл бұрын
Google and eigenvalues
10:58
Жыл бұрын
Which two implies the third?
7:35
cos = 2 (in Spanish)
8:12
Жыл бұрын
a quasi-Pythagorean identity
4:18
my math YouTube advice
22:55
Жыл бұрын
Feynman Integral from Reddit
8:37
2 жыл бұрын
number comparison: 57^8 vs 62^7
2:54
Пікірлер
@DAMN__________
@DAMN__________ Күн бұрын
but what is in the first problem x is squared?
@sadececns00
@sadececns00 2 күн бұрын
Min tişkî fêm nekir😪
@roms_jr
@roms_jr 2 күн бұрын
😏
@unruly_ronin
@unruly_ronin 2 күн бұрын
Great video man
@user-yi8bz2ng6z
@user-yi8bz2ng6z 2 күн бұрын
thank you sir, keep going
@racheltdm8699
@racheltdm8699 2 күн бұрын
This guy's passion scares me... also gives me smiles when im struggling with calculas :D
@shahidaakther6591
@shahidaakther6591 2 күн бұрын
Doesn't work most of the time.
@drpeyam
@drpeyam 2 күн бұрын
It does though
@noobgang7241
@noobgang7241 2 күн бұрын
broooooooh u r the real gigachad
@Khadim-hk4gr
@Khadim-hk4gr 3 күн бұрын
Sir, please share your nomber to me
@dineshashar8255
@dineshashar8255 3 күн бұрын
Great Examples
@IlayShriki
@IlayShriki 4 күн бұрын
you are underated
@drpeyam
@drpeyam 3 күн бұрын
Thank you :3
@v8torque932
@v8torque932 4 күн бұрын
What?
@DisiCoco-nm2gw
@DisiCoco-nm2gw 4 күн бұрын
🤝🙌👍👏
@fadibenzaima5348
@fadibenzaima5348 4 күн бұрын
Is there any video that explains these concepts and why row reduction works geometrically ?
@drpeyam
@drpeyam 3 күн бұрын
You can check out the playlist!!
@DisiCoco-nm2gw
@DisiCoco-nm2gw 4 күн бұрын
5:00 pls link the video someone
@drpeyam
@drpeyam 3 күн бұрын
I think it might be in the playlist!
@nguyenvanphutrong8415
@nguyenvanphutrong8415 4 күн бұрын
what a wonderful video, it is very helpful for me thanks a lot
@bentan5718
@bentan5718 4 күн бұрын
i thought its anti derivative wuld be -1/2x * cos(x^2)
@drpeyam
@drpeyam 4 күн бұрын
That wouldn’t be true because of the product rule!
@user-wj1qb3qu1y
@user-wj1qb3qu1y 4 күн бұрын
Can we solve it without trig trick? خيلي زيابست
@colinjava8447
@colinjava8447 5 күн бұрын
I remember discovering it myself when I was trying to sum reciprocals, and noticed the graph looked a lot like ln x, so I let my calculator run all night working out the difference that was about 0.577.
@name-sg8oo
@name-sg8oo 5 күн бұрын
Can you mention the book you found this trick from? Btw really amazing video!!
@drpeyam
@drpeyam 5 күн бұрын
Analysis by Ross
@sebastiangudino9377
@sebastiangudino9377 5 күн бұрын
Why isnt this taught to all students in calc I? I never knew this!
@DisiCoco-nm2gw
@DisiCoco-nm2gw 6 күн бұрын
Niceeeeee
@McMU51C
@McMU51C 6 күн бұрын
I love you sir; God bless you forever
@drpeyam
@drpeyam 5 күн бұрын
Thank you!!!!
@easymathematik
@easymathematik 6 күн бұрын
Proof accepted. :)
@jesuslopez8404
@jesuslopez8404 6 күн бұрын
Nice :-) Wondered if the log gave the infinitesimal generator of all rotations and an small experiment in Maple confirms. m is your matrix logarithm, then with(LinearAlgebra):MatrixExponential(phi*m) gives a generic rotation. For phi=1 your starting point half pi rotation (90º) is recovered and for phi=4 would be 2pi radians rotation. Satisfying!
@realitygray8448
@realitygray8448 6 күн бұрын
Dr. Peyam, I miss you!! How are you doing? :) (If you even see this)
@drpeyam
@drpeyam 6 күн бұрын
I’m gooood, thank you for asking 😄😄
@BilalAhmed-on4kd
@BilalAhmed-on4kd 7 күн бұрын
but since we used ln here, doesn't this exclude y values that are <=0 ?
@adilkorkmaz4964
@adilkorkmaz4964 7 күн бұрын
THANKS,., THAT IS THE SOLUTION I WANT TO FIND...
@Azagnebirhanu
@Azagnebirhanu 7 күн бұрын
Thank u smart
@jenm1
@jenm1 8 күн бұрын
beyond fantastic
@FerghusCameron
@FerghusCameron 8 күн бұрын
Why is all the math I struggle with so simple when I find the teacher that can explain in my way? I will try to get up to Calculus by the end of 11th grade as i have never gotten to enter Middle school or High school due to payment issues and for my family having trouble with work thank you sir 🙏
@lauri268
@lauri268 8 күн бұрын
Thank you very much for this. I was struggling with a similar problem for hours. I'm still trying to grasp it so I have a question: Would I be correct if I said that the matrix can be recovered unambiguously because: - The column vectors of A corresponding the pivot columns of A' form the basis of a column space of A - Thus, the other column vectors can be written as the linear combination of the basis vectors in EXACTLY one way.
@enricoganassin4163
@enricoganassin4163 8 күн бұрын
Amazing
@raspberrywizard
@raspberrywizard 9 күн бұрын
Perfect & clear explanation (way better than my textbook/professor)! Your video was very helpful in studying for my final tomorrow. Thank you!
@drpeyam
@drpeyam 9 күн бұрын
Best of luck!!!
@eduardocortes9066
@eduardocortes9066 9 күн бұрын
I have a question. How we can indetify functoons that doesnt have a antiderivative?
@jeffreyanderson1249
@jeffreyanderson1249 10 күн бұрын
What about not a ball but a sphere? Is that open?
@b07_ashishsuradkar49
@b07_ashishsuradkar49 10 күн бұрын
Thanks sir
@user-tj2fj7vz1n
@user-tj2fj7vz1n 10 күн бұрын
But i use this method all the time
@positivenozy6065
@positivenozy6065 10 күн бұрын
0:22 doc dropped fire beat tho
@ThobelaGoge
@ThobelaGoge 11 күн бұрын
I finally found a video that makes it more clear....Thanks man
@floribus5522
@floribus5522 11 күн бұрын
Great Video as always. Isn't there a problem defining the metric on X like this, because X is not a vector space, hence not a Banach space. Or maybe I'am misunderstanding something.
@rolfschramek7060
@rolfschramek7060 11 күн бұрын
Great Video as always. Isn't there a problem defining the metric on X like this, because X is not a vector space, hence not a Banach space. Or maybe I'am misunderstanding something.
@user-vh8bd6dg7s
@user-vh8bd6dg7s 11 күн бұрын
Not gonna lie our teacher taught this first in middle school before quadratic formula, Indian maths teacher rocks
@nav1448
@nav1448 11 күн бұрын
Exams coming this week, am glad i saw this...
@johnwpatterson7766
@johnwpatterson7766 11 күн бұрын
From J. W. Patterson: are all transcendental numbers dimensionless?
@himadrikhanra7463
@himadrikhanra7463 11 күн бұрын
Xtanx= ytany..thereafter uv - vdu...biparts...
@Robin-Dabank696
@Robin-Dabank696 11 күн бұрын
At 5:40, instead of mentioning the definition of the Riemann integral, you can instead draw the graph y=1 and calculate the area manually as the area is just a rectangle. In my opinion this is more rigourous
@chill4r585
@chill4r585 11 күн бұрын
Hi Dr Peyam, Id like to ask whether this can be proven with the mean value theorem and just be as valid? Mean value theorem + Squeeze theorem. Thanks!
@kamthecham1843
@kamthecham1843 12 күн бұрын
Great explanation sir
@drpeyam
@drpeyam 12 күн бұрын
Thanks and welcome!!