This guy's passion scares me... also gives me smiles when im struggling with calculas :D
@shahidaakther65912 күн бұрын
Doesn't work most of the time.
@drpeyam2 күн бұрын
It does though
@noobgang72412 күн бұрын
broooooooh u r the real gigachad
@Khadim-hk4gr3 күн бұрын
Sir, please share your nomber to me
@dineshashar82553 күн бұрын
Great Examples
@IlayShriki4 күн бұрын
you are underated
@drpeyam3 күн бұрын
Thank you :3
@v8torque9324 күн бұрын
What?
@DisiCoco-nm2gw4 күн бұрын
🤝🙌👍👏
@fadibenzaima53484 күн бұрын
Is there any video that explains these concepts and why row reduction works geometrically ?
@drpeyam3 күн бұрын
You can check out the playlist!!
@DisiCoco-nm2gw4 күн бұрын
5:00 pls link the video someone
@drpeyam3 күн бұрын
I think it might be in the playlist!
@nguyenvanphutrong84154 күн бұрын
what a wonderful video, it is very helpful for me thanks a lot
@bentan57184 күн бұрын
i thought its anti derivative wuld be -1/2x * cos(x^2)
@drpeyam4 күн бұрын
That wouldn’t be true because of the product rule!
@user-wj1qb3qu1y4 күн бұрын
Can we solve it without trig trick? خيلي زيابست
@colinjava84475 күн бұрын
I remember discovering it myself when I was trying to sum reciprocals, and noticed the graph looked a lot like ln x, so I let my calculator run all night working out the difference that was about 0.577.
@name-sg8oo5 күн бұрын
Can you mention the book you found this trick from? Btw really amazing video!!
@drpeyam5 күн бұрын
Analysis by Ross
@sebastiangudino93775 күн бұрын
Why isnt this taught to all students in calc I? I never knew this!
@DisiCoco-nm2gw6 күн бұрын
Niceeeeee
@McMU51C6 күн бұрын
I love you sir; God bless you forever
@drpeyam5 күн бұрын
Thank you!!!!
@easymathematik6 күн бұрын
Proof accepted. :)
@jesuslopez84046 күн бұрын
Nice :-) Wondered if the log gave the infinitesimal generator of all rotations and an small experiment in Maple confirms. m is your matrix logarithm, then with(LinearAlgebra):MatrixExponential(phi*m) gives a generic rotation. For phi=1 your starting point half pi rotation (90º) is recovered and for phi=4 would be 2pi radians rotation. Satisfying!
@realitygray84486 күн бұрын
Dr. Peyam, I miss you!! How are you doing? :) (If you even see this)
@drpeyam6 күн бұрын
I’m gooood, thank you for asking 😄😄
@BilalAhmed-on4kd7 күн бұрын
but since we used ln here, doesn't this exclude y values that are <=0 ?
@adilkorkmaz49647 күн бұрын
THANKS,., THAT IS THE SOLUTION I WANT TO FIND...
@Azagnebirhanu7 күн бұрын
Thank u smart
@jenm18 күн бұрын
beyond fantastic
@FerghusCameron8 күн бұрын
Why is all the math I struggle with so simple when I find the teacher that can explain in my way? I will try to get up to Calculus by the end of 11th grade as i have never gotten to enter Middle school or High school due to payment issues and for my family having trouble with work thank you sir 🙏
@lauri2688 күн бұрын
Thank you very much for this. I was struggling with a similar problem for hours. I'm still trying to grasp it so I have a question: Would I be correct if I said that the matrix can be recovered unambiguously because: - The column vectors of A corresponding the pivot columns of A' form the basis of a column space of A - Thus, the other column vectors can be written as the linear combination of the basis vectors in EXACTLY one way.
@enricoganassin41638 күн бұрын
Amazing
@raspberrywizard9 күн бұрын
Perfect & clear explanation (way better than my textbook/professor)! Your video was very helpful in studying for my final tomorrow. Thank you!
@drpeyam9 күн бұрын
Best of luck!!!
@eduardocortes90669 күн бұрын
I have a question. How we can indetify functoons that doesnt have a antiderivative?
@jeffreyanderson124910 күн бұрын
What about not a ball but a sphere? Is that open?
@b07_ashishsuradkar4910 күн бұрын
Thanks sir
@user-tj2fj7vz1n10 күн бұрын
But i use this method all the time
@positivenozy606510 күн бұрын
0:22 doc dropped fire beat tho
@ThobelaGoge11 күн бұрын
I finally found a video that makes it more clear....Thanks man
@floribus552211 күн бұрын
Great Video as always. Isn't there a problem defining the metric on X like this, because X is not a vector space, hence not a Banach space. Or maybe I'am misunderstanding something.
@rolfschramek706011 күн бұрын
Great Video as always. Isn't there a problem defining the metric on X like this, because X is not a vector space, hence not a Banach space. Or maybe I'am misunderstanding something.
@user-vh8bd6dg7s11 күн бұрын
Not gonna lie our teacher taught this first in middle school before quadratic formula, Indian maths teacher rocks
@nav144811 күн бұрын
Exams coming this week, am glad i saw this...
@johnwpatterson776611 күн бұрын
From J. W. Patterson: are all transcendental numbers dimensionless?
@himadrikhanra746311 күн бұрын
Xtanx= ytany..thereafter uv - vdu...biparts...
@Robin-Dabank69611 күн бұрын
At 5:40, instead of mentioning the definition of the Riemann integral, you can instead draw the graph y=1 and calculate the area manually as the area is just a rectangle. In my opinion this is more rigourous
@chill4r58511 күн бұрын
Hi Dr Peyam, Id like to ask whether this can be proven with the mean value theorem and just be as valid? Mean value theorem + Squeeze theorem. Thanks!