Cant hear because of the annoying music :( could not watch
@Sonu-v7z8uАй бұрын
Nice
@cwoermann26872 ай бұрын
Just found one of his works I was reading stuff in college 1990 A new found old love❤😂😂 Like a piece of me found🙃
@eljerc58943 ай бұрын
The way his son got busted with the biggest child (rimes with scorn) collection and got 0 days in jail is a little strange ... His remark about being sexually attracted to his daughter is creepy too
@barbaradavis3933 ай бұрын
One thing that blew my mind was that he had trouble with a college math course and so he switched to Biochemistry.
@alejandrocolina24673 ай бұрын
It is impresive how such a brilliant man, as a biochemist, developed one of the best series of human history, without being a specialist of the area. I am talking about the so called "World History Asimov", a series of 14 volumes. Besides being intelligent, he had a huge culture that can be seen in his incredible series, that explains greatly a lot of periods and topics. Just brilliant
@vilstef69883 ай бұрын
The sole person Asimov acknowledged as more intelligent than himself was Carl Sagan!
@KartikPatel-nt4ff5 ай бұрын
😅😮😮😮😅😅well information good show you can 😅😅😅
@KartikPatel-nt4ff5 ай бұрын
😅😅😮😮😮😅😅😅time yani kya kis chij ko time kahate he jis chij ka astitva he usaka hi sab he jis chij ka bhavtik rup se astitva hi nahi usako ham kya Bolenge 😅natchur me time jesi koi chij hoti nahi he 😅time hamare man ka bhram he time ek megerment hi he or kuch nahi hota he time ka vajan kitana he time ka vajan kitana he time ka dravya man kitana he 😅time kis chij se bani hota he 😅time ek megerment hi he or kuch nahi hota he 😅her equation ki limit hota he bad me vo galat sabit hote he 😅natchur ke khud ke niyam hota he jis se vo chalti he 😅hamare banaye gaye niyam se nahi 😅partikal ek hakikat he dimenton ek kalpana 😅partikal ko dimenton he dimenton se partikal nahi 😅partikal ko hum Bolenge ki itana time hua utana time hua 😅time ko ham nahi Bolenge ki itana partikal hua utana partikal hua 😅time ki ye ulati samaj time travel jesi galat samaj ko janm dete he 😅light ki speed se travel karenge to jaldi pahochenge 😅nahi bhutkal ya bhavisya me 😅partikal ki kitani bhi speed ho use koi farak nahi padata jabtak koi partikal use takratanahi ya marj nahi hota 😅so sthir partikal or gati man partikal me koi farak nahi hota. 😅light ki speed ya usase jyada speed pakadnese 😅partikal shakti nahi banata . Partikal ko takkar ke sivakoi changh nahi ata asa me manatahu .mery comon sense yahi kaheti he.muje to sach lagata he 😅vastavikata se sambandh rakhana chahiye kalpana se nahi 😅😅jay guru ji 😅me ek adhyatmik sansthase juda hua hu aap bhi judiye jay guru ji 😅samarpan meditation 😅guru tattva 😅😅😅
@EndoftheTownProductions7 ай бұрын
John Heminges, Henry Condell, and Richard Burbage, three actors of The Lord Chamberlain's Men, a famous acting company that included William Shakespeare, were given money by William Shakespeare of Stratford in his Last Will and Testament in 1616. Two of these actors, John Heminges and Henry Condell, were responsible for having 36 of Shakespeare's plays published in the First Folio in 1623. Ben Jonson's eulogy in the First Folio clearly praises Shakespeare as a great writer and refers to him as the “Sweet Swan of Avon.” This obviously designates Shakespeare as from Stratford upon Avon. Furthermore, Jonson states that "thy writings to be such, /As neither Man, nor Muse, can praise too much." Heminges and Condell also praise Shakespeare as a writer, stating that "he thought, he uttered with that easinesse, that wee have scarse received from him a blot in his papers. But it is not our province, who onely gather his works, and give them you, to praise him." These are "his works" and "his papers" that they are publishing. He is clearly presented as the writer of these works in the First Folio. The Last Will and Testament of William Shakespeare of Stratford clearly connects him with the 1623 First Folio through Heminges and Condell and it is clear that Shakespeare is presented as the author of the plays.
@snowangelnc11 ай бұрын
The claim of the Great Wall of China being the only man-made structure visible from space always seemed odd to me. If we're going by height and width, the world is full of buildings that are much bigger. If length alone is what we're going on, then highways ought to be equally visible.
@frankdimeglio8216 Жыл бұрын
What is termed or described as constituting the/a “Big Bang” requires what is TIME AND no time ON/IN BALANCE. In other words, in considering, ON BALANCE, TIME AND time dilation, there couldn't have been a “Big Bang” in relation to what is THEN a timeless nothingness. TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE comprise or constitute WHAT IS E=MC2 !!!! SO, consider the following THREE forms ON BALANCE: What is THE SUN. What is invisible AND VISIBLE SPACE in fundamental equilibrium AND BALANCE. What is outer “space”. (TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE)). Great. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. Regarding WHAT IS E=MC, c squared CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. Great. Indeed, consider what is stellar clustering. By Frank Martin DiMeglio A given PLANET (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME. Great !!!! c squared CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY represents a dimension of SPACE (ON BALANCE) that IS fully consistent with WHAT IS E=MC2. GREAT. (Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE.) SO, this IS consistent with what is the FOURTH dimension. Again, consider what is two AND three dimensional SPACE ON BALANCE; AS what is E=MC2 IS (ON BALANCE) what is gravity AS SPACE. (Again, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE !!) TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Again, this mathematically proves what is the fourth dimension ON BALANCE; AS what is E=MC2 IS what is gravity AS SPACE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. SO, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE (ON BALANCE); AND/AS GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. SO, ON BALANCE, c squared CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. Great. It is proven. By Frank Martin DiMeglio TRUTH, reality, AND nature/natural experience go hand in hand. Top down thinking is what has been missing regarding mathematical AND physical understanding. Logic and philosophical reasoning and reflection are truly of paramount importance. Balance and completeness go hand in hand. The integrated extensiveness of thought AND description is improved in the truly superior mind. THE ABSOLUTE AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL PROOF OF WHAT IS THE FOURTH DIMENSION: BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand, AS what is gravity is, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!!! Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE, AS c squared CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS WHAT IS E=MC2 IS what is gravity AS SPACE. CLEARLY (ON BALANCE), this proves (including mathematically) what is the FOURTH dimension !!!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. Great. A given PLANET (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME. Great !!!! Carefully consider (ON BALANCE) why and how it is that there is SOMETHING instead of nothing !!!! Indeed, consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. NOW, consider the associated black “space” of WHAT IS THE EYE along WITH what is the dome; AS two AND three dimensional SPACE are then BALANCED. (Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE.) This mathematically proves what is the fourth dimension. Indeed, regarding what is E=MC2, c squared CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE; AS WHAT IS E=MC2 IS what is gravity AS SPACE. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!!! Great. Again, consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE; AS c squared CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. CLEARLY, ON BALANCE, this mathematically proves what is the fourth dimension; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!!! BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand, AS it ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense ON BALANCE. Magnificent. By Frank Martin DiMeglio
@frankdimeglio8216 Жыл бұрын
The following proves the fourth dimension. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE in conjunction WITH WHAT IS E=MC2, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Great. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE regarding WHAT IS E=MC2. This proves the fourth dimension, as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The second AND third dimensions of SPACE are BALANCED. Indeed, consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. Great. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE), as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Great. This proves the fourth dimension. c squared CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Great. By Frank Martin DiMeglio
@vincentsmith5429 Жыл бұрын
Did the man whose birth and death is registered in the parish records of Holy Trinity Stratford upon Avon actually exist? Ooooooooh that's a tough one. H'mmm gee now, let me think .... Er .... yes. Ah, but was he the same man who showed up in London? H'mmm well, since he's recorded in a court case as 'William Shakespeare Stratford upon Avon in the Countie of Warwick, the answer is um, er ... Ooooooo tough one again..... yes. But was he the same man who became an actor? Well, since the college of Arms records him as 'Shakespeare the Player', and he is mentioned as principle actor in Ben Jonson's work, then I .... ooooh tough one. No it's not. yes Was he the same one who wrote the plays? Well, since he is listed as author of several of the lays in the listing of entertainments for the King in 1604, and is also clearly described as writer by Francis Meres, Ben Jonson, William Davenant , Francis Beaumont and John Webster ... I'll go for a yes. Ever think of checking facts before committing yourself to video?
@Invest4Cashflow Жыл бұрын
Serbian genius ❤❤❤
@Invest4Cashflow Жыл бұрын
🎉🎉🎉
@johnglielmi6428 Жыл бұрын
Einstein is my Math Idol. Literally a beautiful mind. He had the ability to explain his genius to anyone. Also I love how he fought against the use of weapons of mass destruction during WWII. I remember seeing Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer say after the testing of the bomb "Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds." in a documentary. you can see how much the use of E=mc^2 had affected him. the look in his eyes was shear regret.
@karry2337 Жыл бұрын
App very clever.Thinking of painting,check drawings of the human body by DaVinci.Brilliant!!
@FallNorth Жыл бұрын
Churchill was a very principled liberal, trying to say he was e.g. "pro concentration camp"is a disgusting dishonest left wing slur. I'm not saying this video is playing that game, I don' think it did, but I've seen it played.
@Salomessanctuary Жыл бұрын
Happy Birthday Nikola Tesla. ❤❤❤🙏🙏🙏
@michaelkahn8744 Жыл бұрын
The problem of modern physics is they're trying to explain everything with particle physics and the physics is being cornered more and more to the dead end. To escape the dead end, they invent or design another imaginary particle in vain instead of trying to revise their way to approach to the problem. I agree to that idea that the interaction between mass and space must be explained with quantum mechanics. But that doesn't mean gravity is the QM phenomena. That's because gravity is not a force. Gravity is just a joint effect of the expansion of the Universe and the curvature of spacetime. Details are given below. Alternative Explanation of Dark Matter and Dark Energy - Newly proposed model of Universe can explain both of Dark Matter and Dark Energy Einstein’s theory of General Relativity states that spacetime is curved by the presence of mass. This curvature influences the motion other objects with mass and gives rise to gravitation. Thus, gravity is a result of geometric features in spacetime. However, we also observe gravitational effects - curvature of spacetime - in areas without any detectable mass. This has given rise to the concept of dark matter, which is matter that does not interact in any detectable way with normal matter, except through gravity. So, there is some large quantity of dark matter scattered throughout the universe, which curves spacetime and causes gravitational effects just like normal matter, but we cannot see or detect it with any known method. An alternative theory to the identity of dark matter is proposed - it is not matter at all, but rather an intrinsic curvature of spacetime. In other words, spacetime is not naturally flat. Even in the absence of matter, we observe some inherent curvature of spacetime. So, the question is now - why is spacetime naturally curved? Why is it not flat in the absence of mass? The universe is 4-dimensional, with 3 spatial dimensions and one dimension in time. Rather than consider time as a linear dimension, we can consider it as a radial one. Therefore, rather than describing the universe with a Cartesian coordinate system, we describe it with a 4-dimensional spherical coordinate system - 3 angular coordinates, φ1, φ2, φ3, and one radial coordinate in time, t. We live on the 3-dimensional surface of a 4-dimensional bubble which is expanding radially in time. Thus, the Big Bang represents t=0, the beginning of time. The crucial point is that the expansion of the universe is not homogeneous in all directions. The expansion rate at one point on the bubble’s surface may differ slightly from another point near it. The universe is only roughly spherical in 4 dimensions, the same way that the Earth is only roughly spherical in 3 dimensions. The same way we observe local mountains and valleys on the surface of Earth, we observe local “mountains” and “valleys” on the surface of the universe bubble. The inhomogeneity of the expansion of the universe has given rise to natural curvature of spacetime. This natural curvature causes the phenomenon of “dark matter”. “Valleys” in spacetime pull matter in, similarly to the warping of spacetime of massive objects. So “dark matter” is really “valleys” in spacetime that are expanding slower than the regions surrounding it. These valleys tend to pull matter in and create planets, stars, and galaxies - regions of space with higher-than-average densities of mass. Conversely, “mountains” in spacetime will repel matter away, an “anti-gravitational” effect, which gives rise to cosmic voids in space where we observe no matter. Each point on the surface of the universe bubble traces out a time arrow in 4-dimensional space, perpendicular to the surface. These time arrows are not parallel to each other since the universe is not flat. This causes points to have nonzero relative velocity away from each other. It is generally accepted that the universe is expanding faster than observable energy can explain, and this is expansion is believe to be still accelerating. The “missing” energy required to explain these observations has given rise to the theory of dark energy. The time dilation caused by non-parallel time arrows can be proposed as an explanation for dark energy. Alternatively, dark energy is real energy coming from potential energy gradients caused by non-parallel time arrows. As a sanity check, we can calculate the expansion rate of the universe based on the universe bubble model. Since the radius of the universe bubble is expanding at the speed of light in the time direction, it increases at 1 light second per second. Therefore, the “circumference” of the 3-dimensional surface increases by 2π light seconds per second, or about 1.88*10^6 km/s. This expansion is distributed equally across the 3-dimensional surface, so the actual observed expansion rate is proportional to the distance from the observer. At present, the age of the universe is estimated to be 13.8 billion years, so the radius of the universe bubble is 13.8 billion light years, or about 4233 megaparsecs (3.26 million light years to 1 Mpc). Thus, we can calculate the expansion rate of the universe, per megaparsec from the observer, as: Expansion rate = ((d(circumference))/dt)/radiusofuniverse=(1.88*〖10〗^6 km⁄s)/(2π*4233Mpc)=(1.88*〖10〗^6 km⁄s)/26598Mpc=70.82(km⁄s)/Mpc The popularly accepted empirical expansion rate is 73.5 +/- 2.5 km/s/Mpc, so our calculated value is close. There may be some additional source of expansion (or observed red shift) to make up for the discrepancy. For example, if two adjacent points have some gravitational gradient due to non-parallel time arrows, then light passing through these points will be red-shifted. - Cited from www.academia.edu/82481487/Title_Alternative_Explanation_of_Dark_Matter_and_Dark_Energy
@frankdimeglio8216 Жыл бұрын
CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE, AS WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma; AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS c squared CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. By Frank Martin DiMeglio
@counterpointinhistory Жыл бұрын
You can also check out this other video where I talk about Albert Einstein's doubts about black holes: kzbin.info/www/bejne/h4TFoX1plpykj6M
@Green12349 Жыл бұрын
you are too underrated
@counterpointinhistory Жыл бұрын
✅ Watch the playlists: ➡ bit.ly/CIH_Playlists
@GreatMindsLearnOffical Жыл бұрын
This video uncovers intriguing details about Einstein's life, challenging common misconceptions and revealing lesser-known aspects of his remarkable journey, providing a fresh perspective on this iconic figure.
@LoganBianchi-zu5ds Жыл бұрын
3 things you probably didn’t know about Albert Einstein: 1. He stole ideas from other scientists. He is far from being the genius people think he is. 2. He wasn’t a pacifist. He knew exactly what was going to happen regarding the atomic bombs used against Japan, and he was an active member in the project. 3. Some sources say he was physically and sexually abusive towards women and children.
@michaelccopelandsr7120 Жыл бұрын
How about this? Dark Energy is EQUAL to Energy plus TIME, for our purposes here, "HEAVY TIME." Mira, look, we see this electron orbit however many times a minute. We set that as our base reading, right? For our plain of existence, anyway. However, in these pockets of, "heavy time," that same electron now has readings of a billion times a minute because time is HEAVY here and passes a billion times faster. Or, energy where there shouldn't be energy / dark energy / Heavy Time. See, in that same minute to us, that electron aged a billion times faster and therefore has given off readings of dark energy. Dark energy IS "HEAVY TIME." It's the difference in TIME that we're seeing! Maybe. The light from these galaxies have been aged by going through pockets of dark energy or "heavy time." Numbers used for reference only. TI-I-I-IME IS ON MY SIDE! YES, IT IS! Now we look at the other side of the coin, dark matter. Pockets of dark matter are actually pockets of "LIGHT TIME." Mira, look, if heavy time is faster pockets of time. It stands to reason, light time would be slower pockets of time, right? Making our base electron seem to stand still. Get a pocket full of seemingly motionless nothing and you get a pocket of starving dark matter. In this case, "starving," or slower pockets in time is the same as creating a vacuum in space. Since this pocket of "Light time" is "starving" and everything outside this pocket of dark matter is in a "heavier time," it makes it appear dark matter is attracting when really it's just a vacuum, IN TIME, trying to equalize. Making it stand to reason, by my, "I'm not smart enough to give anything more than this simplified reasoning, that Dark Matter is "LIGHT TIME" and Dark Energy is "HEAVY TIME." Maybe. Now think about this. As light travels through the universe and passes through these pockets of Heavy Time or Light Time. Doesn't that "age" that particular beam of light? Doesn't that beam of light that is say 40 million light years away now look like it's 100 million light years away? If I'm right, it would explain why these 6 "old" galaxies are being discovered. Also, if I'm right and someone proves it, you must name it after me and give me a cut of the Nobel prize winnings. Pass it on please. and thank you. P.S. I may have gotten the names, LIGHT and HEAVY, backwards. Thanks again and don't worry. Where I come from, crazy is a compliment. ;-P
@dave9102 Жыл бұрын
It's so refreshing when the author does ask you constantly press like and share his videos
@counterpointinhistory Жыл бұрын
✅ Watch the playlists: ➡ bit.ly/CIH_Playlists
@counterpointinhistory Жыл бұрын
✅ Watch the playlists: ➡ bit.ly/CIH_Playlists
@LostInThePast445 Жыл бұрын
Interesting video
@frankdimeglio8216 Жыл бұрын
What is gravity is, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. Consider what is THE SUN. (Consider WHAT IS E=MC2.) The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. NOW, consider what is the structural form that is THE EYE. Notice the associated black “space” of WHAT IS THE EYE. Consider what is outer “space” ON BALANCE. Notice what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE. Great. Think. THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. I have solved the coronal heating “problem”. I have mathematically proven what is the fourth dimension. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Magnificent !!!! By Frank Martin DiMeglio
@scottythetrex5197 Жыл бұрын
You know I'm really tired of this crap about Tesla. This cult of personality around him his ridiculous, especially when it comes at the expense of people like Edison, who are now vilified as hired "corporate guns" that weren't in the same league as the "real deal" Nikola. It's all bs.
@marius964 Жыл бұрын
you lost the unique chance to keep your mouth shut
@frankdimeglio8216 Жыл бұрын
I'm way smarter than Einstein.
@anthonycraig274 Жыл бұрын
Newton did have a lot of crazy ideas but that’s the nature of a free mind. It goes into some strange places. For his reputation, his peers hid away his notes.
@SuliamanBarrie-sp9ej Жыл бұрын
Fact 2,is fake
@frankdimeglio8216 Жыл бұрын
WHY THE DENSITY OF THE SUN IS ONE QUARTER OF THAT OF WHAT IS THE EARTH: Consider what is THE EYE. The fourth dimension is consistent with WHAT IS E=MC2, AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE; AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. So, a given PLANET (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Indeed, consider what is the fully illuminated AND setting/WHITE MOON. Now, consider that WHAT IS the ORANGE AND setting Sun is (ON BALANCE) the SAME SIZE as THE EYE. Notice the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE, AS THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. I have mathematically proven why the density of what is THE SUN IS about ONE QUARTER of that of what is THE EARTH. The bulk density of WHAT IS THE MOON IS comparable to that of what are (volcanic) basaltic lavas ON THE EARTH. By Frank Martin DiMeglio
@counterpointinhistory Жыл бұрын
✅ Watch the playlists: ➡ bit.ly/CIH_Playlists
@varadapai3828 Жыл бұрын
Fact2 is fake
@varadapai3828 Жыл бұрын
Albert Einstein did not speak till age 5
@frankdimeglio8216 Жыл бұрын
He never was a high level genius.
@frankdimeglio8216 Жыл бұрын
ABSOLUTE AND CLEAR MATHEMATICAL PROOF THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity: Consider what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE AND WHAT IS THE EYE, AS HALF of WHAT IS THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE !!! TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! (WHAT IS GRAVITY is, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked !!!) Notice WHAT IS the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON ON BALANCE, AS the curvature or shape DOES match that of what is THE EARTH/ground (given what is a CLEAR horizon, of course) !!! GREAT !!! It is proven !!! The density of what is pure water IS ONE HALF of that of what is packed sand/wet packed sand ON BALANCE !! The bulk density of WHAT IS THE MOON IS comparable to that of what are (volcanic) basaltic lavas ON THE EARTH. LAVA IS about THREE TIMES as dense as what is WATER. The maria (lunar “seas”) do occupy ONE THIRD of the near side of WHAT IS THE MOON ON BALANCE. GREAT. Notice WHAT IS the ORANGE (AND setting) Sun ON BALANCE, AND notice the CLEAR SPACE around it; AS it IS the SAME SIZE as WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE !!! GREAT. In fact, the diameter of WHAT IS THE MOON IS about ONE QUARTER (at 27%) of that of WHAT IS THE EARTH (ON BALANCE) !!! TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! I have revolutionized physics. I have proven why and how the land surface area of WHAT IS THE EARTH/ground is EXACTLY between ONE THIRD AND ONE QUARTER (at 29%). It is FUNDAMENTALLY related to lava AND water ON/IN BALANCE. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! I have revolutionized physics. (WHAT IS GRAVITY is, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked !!!) MAGNIFICENT !!! By Frank Martin DiMeglio
@frankdimeglio8216 Жыл бұрын
WHAT IS E=MC2 IS SPACE AS what is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. In other words, WHAT IS E=MC2 IS SPACE AS what is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!!! Indeed, consider what is THE EARTH/ground ON BALANCE !! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!!! Indeed, consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE. Now, consider, ON BALANCE, what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON !!! So, ON BALANCE, consider what is the orange (AND setting) Sun !!! ON BALANCE, it is the SAME SIZE as WHAT IS THE EYE !!! CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Indeed, WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. Now, notice what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE; AS what is THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. GREAT !!! So, consider, ON BALANCE, why and how it is that there is something instead of nothing. (BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.) It ALL does CLEARLY make perfect sense ON BALANCE !!!! A given PLANET (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !!!! GREAT !!! By Frank Martin DiMeglio Consider what is THE SUN. Consider what is THE EYE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. This CLEARLY explains and proves what is the fourth dimension. By Frank Martin DiMeglio
@frankdimeglio8216 Жыл бұрын
WHAT IS E=MC2 IS SPACE AS what is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. In other words, WHAT IS E=MC2 IS SPACE AS what is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!!! Indeed, consider what is THE EARTH/ground ON BALANCE !! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!!! Indeed, consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE. Now, consider, ON BALANCE, what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON !!! So, ON BALANCE, consider what is the orange (AND setting) Sun !!! ON BALANCE, it is the SAME SIZE as WHAT IS THE EYE !!! CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Indeed, WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. Now, notice what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE; AS what is THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. GREAT !!! So, consider, ON BALANCE, why and how it is that there is something instead of nothing. (BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.) It ALL does CLEARLY make perfect sense ON BALANCE !!!! A given PLANET (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !!!! GREAT !!! By Frank Martin DiMeglio Consider what is THE SUN. Consider what is THE EYE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. This CLEARLY explains and proves what is the fourth dimension. By Frank Martin DiMeglio
@frankdimeglio8216 Жыл бұрын
Consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE. (Notice the associated black “space” of WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE, AS BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.) WHAT IS E=MC2 is gravity. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE !! TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. INDEED, consider what is the fully illuminated AND setting/WHITE MOON ON BALANCE; AS it IS the SAME SIZE as what is THE EYE. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense ON BALANCE. INDEED, consider, ON BALANCE, why and how it is that there is something instead of nothing. Great. LOOK at what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE !!(THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE.) Consider what is the ORANGE AND setting Sun. Magnificent. Notice that, ON BALANCE, the curvature or shape of WHAT IS THE MOON matches that of WHAT IS THE EARTH/GROUND. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. INDEED, consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE. NOW, consider what is THE SUN along WITH the fact that the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A given PLANET (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME. Great. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS WHAT IS GRAVITY (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE !! INDEED, consider, ON BALANCE, why and how it is that there is something instead of nothing. Great. Consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE (ON BALANCE). Magnificent. By Frank Martin DiMeglio
@frankdimeglio8216 Жыл бұрын
I have surpassed Newton and Einstein.
@frankdimeglio8216 Жыл бұрын
WHAT IS E=MC2 IS SPACE AS what is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. In other words, WHAT IS E=MC2 IS SPACE AS what is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!!! Indeed, consider what is THE EARTH/ground ON BALANCE !! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!!! Indeed, consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE. Now, consider, ON BALANCE, what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON !!! So, ON BALANCE, consider what is the orange (AND setting) Sun !!! ON BALANCE, it is the SAME SIZE as WHAT IS THE EYE !!! CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Indeed, WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. Now, notice what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE; AS what is THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. GREAT !!! So, consider, ON BALANCE, why and how it is that there is something instead of nothing. (BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.) It ALL does CLEARLY make perfect sense ON BALANCE !!!! A given PLANET (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !!!! GREAT !!! By Frank Martin DiMeglio Consider what is THE SUN. Consider what is THE EYE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. This CLEARLY explains and proves what is the fourth dimension. By Frank Martin DiMeglio
@counterpointinhistory Жыл бұрын
✅ Watch the playlists: ➡ bit.ly/CIH_Playlists
@counterpointinhistory Жыл бұрын
✅ Watch the playlists: ➡ bit.ly/CIH_Playlists
@manojkumar-qn3mw Жыл бұрын
Saroj surrender Albert Einstein
@frankdimeglio8216 Жыл бұрын
WHAT IS E=MC2 IS SPACE AS what is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. In other words, WHAT IS E=MC2 IS SPACE AS what is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!!! Indeed, consider what is THE EARTH/ground ON BALANCE !! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!!! Indeed, consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE. Now, consider, ON BALANCE, what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON !!! So, ON BALANCE, consider what is the orange (AND setting) Sun !!! ON BALANCE, it is the SAME SIZE as WHAT IS THE EYE !!! CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Indeed, WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. Now, notice what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE; AS what is THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. GREAT !!! So, consider, ON BALANCE, why and how it is that there is something instead of nothing. (BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.) It ALL does CLEARLY make perfect sense ON BALANCE !!!! A given PLANET (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !!!! GREAT !!! By Frank Martin DiMeglio Consider what is THE SUN. Consider what is THE EYE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. This CLEARLY explains and proves what is the fourth dimension. By Frank Martin DiMeglio
@frankdimeglio8216 Жыл бұрын
WHAT IS E=MC2 IS SPACE AS what is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. In other words, WHAT IS E=MC2 IS SPACE AS what is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!!! Indeed, consider what is THE EARTH/ground ON BALANCE !! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!!! Indeed, consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE. Now, consider, ON BALANCE, what is the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON !!! So, ON BALANCE, consider what is the orange (AND setting) Sun !!! ON BALANCE, it is the SAME SIZE as WHAT IS THE EYE !!! CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Indeed, WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. Now, notice what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE; AS what is THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. GREAT !!! By Frank Martin DiMeglio