ChatGPT isn’t “hallucinating” it’s bullshitting.

I think the prompting is how to get the best out of AI,I tried the book title but instead of giving it a title to work with, I just asked it to convey an intelligence that is proved to be dum and it came up with these , The Genius Paradox Thinking, Therefore Wrong Brilliantly Misguided The Wisdom of Fools Overthinking Everything, Solving Nothing The Bright Side of Being Clueless A Mind Full of Misfires The Elegant Error When Smart Goes Stupid Cleverly Clueless, not bud, 1 prompt

Bullchit.

My own family is going to take over the world! 🤣 Big families that had big families that are having big families. Why? Because we aren’t stupid. We understand the value of family. While most families are going extinct, a hell of a lot of people would have to die before that happened to us.

"how do have time to bitch if your not paid enough". this is the stupidest comment ever!

The US isn't safe from this. To many people migrating here is a recipe for disaster because it's to many cultures all in one place. There is no collective mindset that makes a nation prosper in the future. Which means there will be less people in the future due to all these technology advancement s that make social interactions less common.

Why do most the women i ask say they don't want kids? I can't understand it because this really is why we are on this earth. I would love to have had kids but couldn't get a woman to date who was able to.

Everyone will be able to have as many partners as they want, but if they are infertile what does it matter? By 2060's most of humanity will be infertile. Researcher say the tipping point is about now.

BTW, 99% of coins r a scam or junk since anyone with enough coding experience can make 1 in 30 min.

These guys are NOT experts. The crap David spouts is hilarious. Cherry picking half truths at its finest. No David, blockchain is software ledger tech, can & is used for many many use cases such as banking & surprise surprise IS used by banks already. :-O ISO 20022, BASEL 3, & much more legals & tech frameworks have been laid across the globe already. BIS, IMF, WEF (cough cough), Reserve banks, Govts, Corporations, etc etc are all on board with the technology NOW, either using or tetsing as we speak. For so much 'research' done to claim its just a get rich quick scheme suggests either mental issues, sore loser having missed out, or CIA shill.

In what world are you living in... Oh yeah America

The lack of consumers (a profound foolishness) isn't Keynesian, but at root, classic Marxism. The real problem is the lack of workers producing goods and services.

This aged well. what a load of crap.

This all reminds me of the tech bubble of the late 90s.

"The UN view" on climate change. You mean the overwhelming consensus of relevant experts ie climatologists? Wow you reference Erik Weinstein talking about physics and what's wrong with physics. His theory of everything he calls "Geometric Unity" is pseudoscience, him opining on what's wrong with physics is like me opining on what's wrong with AI and thinking that my opinion is as valuable and true as Dr MAggioiri's because I have a degree in computer science.

Isn't DOGE a duplication/redundancy of the Government Accountability Office?

So all these women were that naive? Doubt it.

Mysoginist wet dreams 🤣😂🤣😂

I remember when credit cards came out and many said who needs it.

If AI does everything for humans, humans will not use their brains and become stupid. The brain will be just a useless organ like the appendix. Humans should be able to multiply in their heads instead of depending on calculators. Of course, computers have their use. Just do not depend on them too much.

Nature made men more motivated by sex, and also made men better built to gather resources. The idea is men will accept any number of women, and women will accept whatever man can satisfy her resource needs. Now we've created a society where women are empowered to get resources on their own, but men are not necessarily empowered to get sex. Congratulations, you've broken the system - now society wil collapse. Enjoy your freedom while you can, ladies!

@El Podcast he is saying some word for involuntary single women . How is it spelled?

Was there concrete proof Joe abused Rosemary? It is an awful thing to accuse him of, if it had no real grounds of truth.

Wow what a year. I bet o1 writes better code than this dork

We will have 10 billion people on earth by the end of the century; even with this “population collapse”. In fact, the reason why insane hysterical right wingers are going nuts is that most of those people will be black or brown. Maybe start treating human beings as inherently valuable beings and stop wars, stop oppression, stop greed and capitalism. Make the world a place hospitable to having children.

Banks are anyways at least 10 years behind in their tech and they move at a snail's pace.

There is a lot of cognitive dissonance from the guest. He laments that western socities with 'free' women are self eradicating while at the same time failing to recognize that being a wage slave and swiping right on Tinder is not real freedom.

I find it disappointing that even an author with a realist persona avoids telling us that there will be enormous destruction to the job market. Imagine 80% of white collar workers being replaced. Accountants, bankers, lawyers, physicians, etc.

Cool pod!

34:21 as far as the old people in the healthcare well then just remember with artificial intelligence and biotech will then that's not going to be a problem than not too distant future

34:06 Good! Finally at this point in the video somebody's talking about artificial intelligence and radical life extension. This is a real thing. Not only is this real but there's those who say that probably around the early 2030s so to speak we will achieve what Ray krzwell calls... Longevity escape velocity.... If we have this around the early 2030s to wear for every year that goes by on the calendar another year of lifespan is added to the average human being will then we are already halfway there to where it doesn't matter that much whether we reproduce it all. Also another good thing it was mentioned just now robots and automation and bringing down the cost of living so then therefore we can move on from this slavering barbaric paradigm of trying to hoard resources. It might be that it will take a little while before people can learn a new paradigm to live by but this is what I'm interested in. Of course I made 69 right now and there is like a hard to calculate probability of whether or not I will make it to the other side of this however I've always dreamed of this this sounds like a borderline utopia. also another thing is as far as AI goes there's evidence that with what is called scientific researchers that was created by sakana in Japan but also replicated in open AI and Google will then we are almost automating the increase in AI's intelligence. This kind of goes to a sort of idea of the singularity, but for the most part it will be engineered with humans in the loop that's the way it's looking right now. As a matter of fact it's very interesting that just about the same time that the whole world is panicking about a lower birth rate will then we're at the dawn of the beginning of indefinite lifespans for human beings. Radical life extension, automation, super intelligence, is all coming just in time for the so-called population collapse..

28:00 'should we import men that are good enough?' yeah that just sounds wonderful. And also let's just simply ask the question what makes women so good and men so bad? Why is it that a man who is just a decent human being is of a lower real value than a woman who is also a decent human being? Let's say both of them are equal attractiveness but according to this paradigm or this narrative I should say well then a man is not worth hardly anything unless he has something more than just what a man is? We need to ask some hard questions about all this and also is that really actually indicative of the nature of the entire population or how much of this has to do with tinder and these god-awful dating apps? It really starts making women look like absolutely horrible human beings if men usually have fairly mild requirements for women but women have all these ridiculous requirements for men. Part of me almost says that if that is actually the way we are engineered well then we need to use artificial intelligence and biotechnology to re-engineer ourselves to be a better species or else in reality we actually do deserve to go extinct.

27:05 "Men are not good enough".... Well I say women with that attitude are not good enough. However the question is how much of all this has to do with DNA versus social constructs such as what happens if in the future we have a post-scarcity super abundance society perhaps after AI has taken over everything? Everybody gets a UBI your respective of gender race and then over the course of time AI and automation bring the cost of producing finished goods down to near zero marginal cost well then the UBI even a constant dollars would end up buying more as time went on. I know that that sounds counterintuitive but because of the history that we have seen, however this may change and it's beginning to change in a lot of areas.

26:19 "Man who had resources were hoarding all the women" well the women need to take some responsibility for that if that's the case. But perhaps what will start happening or actually when it's starting to happen now is that they're building artificial intelligence sex bots that will be much more affordable than a real wife for men who have less resources. Oh I might as well just simply be honest with everybody I have a real philosophical problem with the idea that sex and love translates into something that women get for free and even also get resources for why us men end up having to pay. So I don't pay for sex or companionship and perhaps that might be the reason why I haven't had as much as maybe guys who have a shitload of money but that's okay. I've done reasonably well irrespective of that. However as we know the main reason why women need resources is because they have the offspring. Well on the other hand isn't it interesting that an awful lot of women have no interest in having offspring and by the way I support that choice. So if it by the way it is in nature so to speak to want to reproduce well then why is it that so many people went and the ability to use the rational conscious mind to not do so actually choose not to? So therefore I would deposit that if in reality reproduction is is not really an instinct but sex is, well then isn't it possible that a reality hoarding resources also is not an instinct either?

26:05 okay so if we're going to have polygamy well then we may have to also do something else. We will have to genetically change reproduction so then you have about seven or so women born for every one man. Well actually this is kind of tongue in cheek because maybe I have some other examples which might be interesting. Okay so most guys if they could could would like to have more than one woman or so. Okay well I'm familiar with a certain subculture of the adult sex positive lifestyle. And what I'm going to tell you is that I have seen in person I have witnessed this. In an adult theater there's usually mostly men sitting there watching porn but once in a while you have a woman walk in with one objective. The objective that this woman would have would be to have sex 15 to 20 or so times as a matter of fact the more the better. However this is a small percentage of women. Okay so the above being said though in society there are some ridiculous ideas about how if a man can procure and bad a lot of women well then he's somehow you know a great individual with high-powered seductive capacities or whatever. a woman wants to walk into an adult theater and have sex with 30 men well then she is every horrible thing under the sun or whatever. This kind of thinking is absolutely idiotic. If the human population is about 50/50 and most of the men are somewhat undesirable relatively speaking, well then if at least that small number of women who also like to have a large number of men are available and even also praised for the fact that they are doing a service to society at large, this helps with the equation the arithmetic equation here. Do we want essentially a small number of men doing very well with many women and most of those women essentially share in the same guy and basically are with him because you know so then they don't have to procure their own resources, and then have most men being miserable? Or maybe we can accept the mathematical imbalances of desire so to speak and find that three or four percent of the female population actually likes to have sex even more than most men. So most women only want three or four partners in their whole life and then most men want 25 or so in their whole life. Now, I knew a woman who came to a party at the Ace of hearts in Portland Oregon way back in January of 2006. She had a goal of 100 sexual relations in one night. There's this one gentleman who ran a spreadsheet who calculated how much time each suitor had if we're going to have this done in 6 and 1/2 hours. She made her goal however some of us had to get in line about three or four times because there weren't enough men in the club at the time. See this could actually make sense this helps balance the equation.

The solution to this is obvious. We need to use artificial intelligence and biotech to hear aging so that any much lower birth rate will still result in some population growth. Why do we need 2.1 children per woman in order to have stable population? The reason is because of the death rate. Now let's try to think in terms of what if a woman has a baby in the 21st century and she is still alive in the 22nd century and maybe her offspring had one offspring. And then that offspring had another one in the 23rd century perhaps. As you can see in that scenario each generation only had one and yet at the end of about a century and a half you have three people there where you started off with one. Actually this is exactly where it's going to go. Oh yeah let's go and talk about the other elephant in the room female mating preferences or whatever. Well I used to think in my twenties that there was something wrong with all this that I personally did not want to have to pay to have my DNA replicated through space-time and so I did not. So then therefore if I say I don't want a woman to have to replicate my DNA for me well then also that woman should not want to have to glean my resources from me. Now also we have another interesting aspect of this is it now in the early 2000s well then we have the phenomena of large numbers of women earning more than their men in that same generation. So then therefore they are cleaning their own resources they have the power to create their own resources. Now let's also look at another factor a fairly large number of women are not interested in having children so therefore they don't need any resources and also they are earning their own resources and don't need a man for that. So then therefore they don't want to reproduce and they also have their own money so why is it that men should still have to pay? Okay so you say that it's evolution or whatever. Well that's fantastic so now the next solution to be is once we have artificial intelligence helping us with biotechnology will then perhaps maybe we could seriously consider some genetic modifications so future generations of human beings will of course be more in balance.

I doubt the rich want to help us improve our lives. They want us to need them and fund them. Thats it. Thats all. AI will just be a great way to keep tabs on everything we do.

55:06 once again social security is very similar to UBI except only starts at 65 or so, and since it's implementation in the 1930s I don't see any real problem with it.

28:58 regarding UBI, we have had the social security system in the United States since the 1930s and I don't believe too many people think that that's infringing on people's rights or leading the totalitarianism.

You can't have robots look after children, WTF? Some things Mads says makes me question his IQ.

I've worked in Tech for 30 years and I completely and utterly disagree. Maybe he should find another job.

Only the racist tRump supporters want to go to the Villages to be with their own kind

When robots/bots/AI are better at being human than humans are then maybe it’s time for us humans to go extinct!

When there is a scarcity of something, there tends to be better ideas on how to use it and take care of it.

nowadays, hardly any kids, especially boys/men, grow up around babies or see pregnant women. Pregnancy thus becomes scary because you only see it in media and exaggerated. And babies become annoying because you only see their annoying side in media and in public. You'll never experience them memorizing your face and actually not screaming but smiling at you. The village is lost. There are no older women anymore to help the new mothers around. Literally everyone is on their own! The mother comes home with the newborn and the father and both grandparents are out working. She can't even fall asleep for a bit😅

"Will women adjust their standards as the situation becomes more dire 10, 20, 30 years from now?" It's already been 10-20 years roughly running this experiment with dating apps. What we see isn't women adjusting their standards but self forming harems around these 1% of men and having children with them but then voting for more social programs from the government around childcare. Essentially further taxing the 99% of productive men that they chose not to have children with in order to finance the 1% of men they did choose to have children with.

The problem, and the driver for these things, is the rampant misandry in western society.

20 or so years from now our computational devices will be about 1 billion times faster. AI will have evolved into something more than LLM's. Robots will be common place. Therefore... Labor needs a much better deal. Same money, less working hours per day. Overtime paid on the day! If those in power do this we could allow an overtime rate of 1.25 per hour up to 55 hours per week. After that... double time. A six hour workday would allow older people to participate in the workplace, thereby helping the safety-net systems maintain viability, and help with labor shortages. This action would also help maintain growing investment accounts... lowering capital cost.

I love this podcast they've always had the most interesting people

The one question I never see population decline doomers address is: How many people on earth is enough people? At what point do we say "ok, this is too many people"? If there is no limit and infinite people is ok then that person is not worth listening to because they're functionally retarded. But I am so tired of all the pearl clutching over population decline. OH MY GOD ECONOMIC NUMBER MIGHT GO DOWN!?? 🙄🙄🙄 There were 6.5 billion people in the world not long ago and everything was fine, in fact some people would say that it was western society's peak. We will adapt, there will be no extinction. The left has somehow made it part of their mission to induce population decline intentionally in 1st world countries while bolstering it in the 3rd world. Meanwhile the right sees any sort of population decline acceptance as the end of the world. Who's gonna take care of the elderly? They can pull themselves up by their bootstraps, they will be FINE. Let social security collapse. We'll be alright. There will be some rough periods but we've clearly been fucking things up trying to make every exit from a bad situation a soft landing. Let some shit hit the fan once in a while. We'll make it through. But jfc I am tired of all these detrimental policies being passed under the guise of "well we need workers, aging population, economic number has to keep going up!". Just, let, shit, happen. It's not going to be the end of the world. It's not even going to be the end of modern society.