6 ай бұрын
Жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@crossious4474 48 минут бұрын
Correct but it didn’t run on gas dude!
@AviationAustin 22 минут бұрын
Gas=fuel
@keirthomas3197 7 сағат бұрын
This plane was developed at Area 51.
@idlecrafter7911 18 сағат бұрын
Why r they so smol?
@piwi2005 22 сағат бұрын
Mirage 2000 doesn't bring any innovations with regard to Mirage 3.... Dude, you don't know anything about jets. Don't do videos about these, you won't loose your time, but evenmore, you won't loose the time of your unlucky viewers.
@Sh4quille0atmeal 22 сағат бұрын
on land? i thought that gosh darn thang was a airohplane
@gislemark79 Күн бұрын
No clue!!!!
@AnonymousAdolf Күн бұрын
Source ?
@alexanderwheeler2238 Күн бұрын
Cost is so much more important than innovation. Innovation should 15% cost 20% if 1 B2 bomber that costs a billion dollars is all you have vs 25 f18 bombers who's air force is better.
@AviationAustin Күн бұрын
I care much more about innovation and design. You largely get what you pay for.
@jonasdauerbrenner6432 Күн бұрын
why is there no point ranking for the US jets?
@AviationAustin Күн бұрын
Because I hadn't developed the system yet
@jonasdauerbrenner6432 Күн бұрын
@@AviationAustin got it, thx.
@saint_lewis Күн бұрын
How the hell can you even see it?
@user-cr5yy4te3i Күн бұрын
America no longer has the wherewithal to produce a 21st century 'blackbird' nor the will......
@shisuyhamna6502 3 күн бұрын
Dois anos apos santos Dumont voar depois de meia duzia de pessoas estarem voando pelo mundo aparece esses dois irmão e vem com essa de não somos os primeiros ! pesquise melhor leia os jornais da época ! não a provas que os irmãos voaram ! alem de no seculo 20 terem refeito seu avião que nem saiu do chan ! já o de santos Dumont sim decolou todas as vezes mesmo refeito em testes hoje em dia !
@enderbeam8089 3 күн бұрын
Europe is not America, we dont have a "military budget"
@AviationAustin 3 күн бұрын
Hence this video
@MrD-p6o 4 күн бұрын
We don't use Harrier anymore 🙄
@nidhi8544 4 күн бұрын
Hello I have commercial pilot interview can you tell what principals I should know about airplane
@AviationAustin 4 күн бұрын
Not really. I'm not a pilot
@ENDERZ72 6 күн бұрын
jetfire?
@Alamo-a2a 6 күн бұрын
how many times we have to say that the SR-71 was not stealth
@fra93ilgrande 7 күн бұрын
Eurofighter 👹👊🏻💥🇪🇺🛩️🌀
@christopherchristianvanlan1809 7 күн бұрын
Looks like Thailand has made its pick
@JamesLorrain902 7 күн бұрын
When I get high get high on speed Mach 2 bumblebee’s (f-22 raptor) drug for me my heart my heart kickstart my heart
@Jeff_is_not_lonley 7 күн бұрын
This is a great video I'm surprised it doesn't have more views
@AviationAustin 7 күн бұрын
Thank you! I'm glad you enjoyed it! Feel free to share it with your friends!
@betelgeuse227 7 күн бұрын
The 737 max is still a relatively new aircraft, So there arent old Aircaft of the type flying, wich Contributes to less Incidents
@AviationAustin 7 күн бұрын
Let's hope it means the safety factors actually improve over time.
@betelgeuse227 7 күн бұрын
@@AviationAustin agree
@mgpanther81 8 күн бұрын
Where is this one located?
@minhaopiniao6785 8 күн бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/l3yrhaJohbKnfMUsi=hiWXM09jfVWrQBnm
@dondouglass6415 8 күн бұрын
The Gripen doesn't fly for the UK.... What?!!
@HANDLE_DEEZ_NUTS 8 күн бұрын
DONT TOUCH THE EXHIBITS!!
@AviationAustin 9 күн бұрын
Anyone surprised by these results?
@PeterToth-u9u 10 күн бұрын
Kurva anyadat bazmeg a kurva anyadat J-20B far better then F-22/F-35 II. a Kuva geci anyadat
@skarmex3439 10 күн бұрын
From what I understand, the suit is made from a Gold-Titanium alloy (Titanium-3) which is apparently 4 times harder than regular titanium... so there ya go...
@larrywhitney 12 күн бұрын
Didn't Alexander F. Mozhaiski fly in 1884 decades before both of them even built their planes?
@AviationAustin 12 күн бұрын
No. He did not sustain flight
@kasugakyosuke6441 12 күн бұрын
This rating is wrong and biased. You're giving more points to some fighters, which are sharing the same issues, but some get 6, some get 7.. Clearly biased and lacking of informations. Your arguments nonsense.
@AviationAustin 12 күн бұрын
Biased for who. They different scores because they were developed at different times
@kasugakyosuke6441 11 күн бұрын
@@AviationAustin Look bro, you're wrong since the beginning of your video. The Mirage 2000 brought no innovations, you clearly don't know what you're talking about. The Mirage 2000, was the very first fighter in the world, to introduce a fully automatic pilot system capable to follow the ground very closely and safely, without human intervention. It's just an example on many. I mean, you even reversed the pics of Mirage 2000 and Rafale.
@AviationAustin 11 күн бұрын
Incorrect. It wasn't added to the mirage until the mirage 2000N about 20 years after it was used on the F-111
@kasugakyosuke6441 11 күн бұрын
@@AviationAustin You're incorrect, how was India able to use such technology in real war conditions, specially no other country ever got the 2000N aside France. Official experts videos said the Mirage 2000 was the first, since you're no expert, and is even reversing pics of 2 fighters, your knowledge is kinda doubtful. Even more, you're not giving points to some fighters, talking about the past things, but they're doing it already nowadays. You're way to rank is super biased. Sorry but facts are facts, the past is the past.
@AviationAustin 10 күн бұрын
@@kasugakyosuke6441 so your proof is "trust me bro some expert somewhere said it" got it. You only think it's biased because it didn't confirm your own bias
@scottmeehan2422 12 күн бұрын
53:29 if that is a Royal Navy harrier then it is a British Aerospace harrier II. Its based on the AV 8B. But definitely not the same.
@scottmorton686 13 күн бұрын
I believe I heard you say all three variants of the F35 have thrust vectoring. This is incorrect. The B model pivots down for STOVL, but does not vector during flight. The other two variants do not vector at all.
@PeterToth-u9u 14 күн бұрын
The problem with u not updated J Series J-20B has vector engine now.
@FelipeFrotaBass 14 күн бұрын
one thing that I would like to understand is: was the trail that they used to help their flight at kitty hawk in 1903 necessary only for keeping it in a straight line or it somehow helped on the take off?
@AviationAustin 14 күн бұрын
How would a rail help takeoff? Also as I stated in the video an assisted takeoff is still a takeoff and does not negate the flight.
@wgehu 14 күн бұрын
The car was invented by the Germans, why do the Americans, the Japanese, they make car tires that are also round
@sdtpilote 14 күн бұрын
So basically what you are saying is now that rafale has air to ground capabilities it can get a well deserved 9/10 versatility and get the 1st place that is soooo obviously is
@driftpro3659 16 күн бұрын
Hey the only ugly thing here is you don’t ever say a Huey is ugly again
@ryankuchera9477 16 күн бұрын
Where's the f14? You put the warthog on this list and not the tomcat??
@fracer6246 16 күн бұрын
Go rank your burgers...
@AviationAustin 16 күн бұрын
Sounds like a fragile European 😂
@almightybogza 16 күн бұрын
My guy legit says that europe has not innovated lol and that we have fallen behind russia ? My guy quite literally every advanced fighter on this list, eurofighter, rafale and gripen would shit on ANY russian plane any day of the week. build a su 57 squadron so we can put that shit to the test you will be eating Meteors for breakfast. There was simply no need for a 5th gen fighter. The US doesnt use its f22 anyway and we are buying the cheap F35s. We have like 3 projects working on gen 6 fighters but even then its more because of a russia scare than a need. Russia couldnt get air superiority over Ukraine they cant do shit. The simple truth is that while the US kept spending money for defence we just shifted to different things. Where we did spend money we are pretty much the best, Meteor was pretty much the best NATO Fox 3 before the americans put the SM6 on their hornets which has more range. Also to put mirage over gripen just shows you dont know shit about the gripen..
@AviationAustin 16 күн бұрын
You should watch my Russian fighter jet video. I think you'll find I don't think highly of the Russian fighters
@user-ex6vl6mv5t 16 күн бұрын
Vietnam
@foam27 17 күн бұрын
"Aerospace engineer" lol
@Noctifern 17 күн бұрын
Those are tires, not wheels
@rab6453 17 күн бұрын
It did not land that fast but the body would get so hot at high speed it would weaken the tires inside the fuselage.mach 3+ made the body super hot.
@AviationAustin 17 күн бұрын
You're correct 👍
@user-sp5rc4vj3p 17 күн бұрын
Su25t can dogfight all other jets at the sametime
@gerardkienstra1441 18 күн бұрын
My favorite stat. Each engine burned nearly 6000 pounds of fuel, Per Second. Amazing
@arminfriedrich7648 18 күн бұрын
Air Force Armament Museum Florida
@reneb3063 18 күн бұрын
this guy does not know what he is talking about. The Gripen is very capable
@AviationAustin 18 күн бұрын
Did I say it wasn't?
@Spoolingturbski 18 күн бұрын
F22 is the absolute best fighter jet we have.