it sounds absurd, yes, what he means is "you don't need to learn everything, you should leave everything to AI, you don't need to exist at all"

So people should be jobless

thanks for posting this

The last time I used GPT-4o for a basic personal website creation, a most simple coding and creative task you can hand over to AI - It failed miserably. So, either advanced features and resources of AI models are very harshly limited to average users, or...

This videos are so bad - i put the transcript into o1 and it told me that it was jiuberjaber for 11 minutes and its clickbait.

Steve Jobs believed that coding teaches people how to think, and that it should be a liberal art that everyone learns.

I've been in tech for 8 years. Can someone advice on what is going to be of irreplaceable value so we can sort out the years to come? I'm fed up of getting new directions all the time it makes the job more n more vulnerable.

gd so many scam bots talking about investment on this vid

This is only true or make sense if we reach the point where we can't advance technology anymore, so AI is at maximum capacity and there's nothing to improve the AI, then we can focus on something else and not to learn programming anymore.

So don't learn coding because: "Prompting is going to become easier and easier. It's because smart AI engineers and prompt engineers working in the background...." Where do you think those engineers come from? People wake up one morning, take a pill and become AI engineers?! Or they learn computer science?

Did she ever say what to study instead of coding? I watched the video twice and I don't think that I heard an answer!

EVERYONE NOW CAN BE A PROGRAMMER. sorry but this is complete bullshit.

Not clear. If zou want to win non-specialists in this sphere, please use their language. And also where and how to get these skills

Dear Goda, do you have a boyfriend?

Who the F*"#! is going to fix the AI then if nobody is left to code? :'D

Pump up that stock price Jensen. That's your job.

I’ll be in the woods. Have fun staring at screens all day.

People who have both prompt engineering with software will win when AI tide recedes.

Programming will shift; from writing source code to using various AI devices in order to create things.

Ofcourse you should learn. Knowledge is important

Who does the QA part for AI?

Everyone can program now. Everyone can write news now. Everyone can draw now. Everyone can solve physics formulas now. Everyone can design database now. Everyone can make a website now. Sure they can.

All this is wonderful, but if we don't look after the planet then it will be useless, so can we get AI to fix climate change now before it all goes wrong very wrong!!

To summarize this video: Instead of coding in a .py file you should code in a .ipynb file.

*I graduated in Computer Science in 2001. Now I manage Ai*

I can't agree more everything you said as a mother of two young boys. Subscribed!!

It seems like what's needed is experience developers who can incorporate ML models into their tech stack just like adding in 3rd-party APIs. When you think of it, sending a text prompt to ChatGPT or a custom model and getting a text result back is very much like sending/receiving data from any API web service. The difference is ML is not deterministic by nature but the tradeoffs and best practices can be learned easier than being a proficient developer who can handle large complex code bases and ambiguity and constant change from product managers. Outside of research, knowing how models work under the hood seems to not be very useful.

you cannot get the best out of any ai system unless you know how t ask the right questions of it. this requires excellent english , maths , science or any domain . and then what you need is to be creative with these tools to ask ai to do things in novel but specific ways .

"young people are always the best at adapting..." so 'old people' are useless & inconsequential? Will they use & abuse the young for the greater good? Not only has the great divide occurred in financial sector, but it is now occurring in the age sector.

Let's think a little. AI will empower anyone in the future in any job, which means a huge expansion of computers. someone says so you should not train computer experts and leave it to us, does that seem logical? If you think prompt engineering will replace traditional engineers, wait for the results from so-called engineers who don't understand science, which will lower the quality of our world. AI can do everything a human can (not from a philosophical perspective) thanks to the engineers who created it. Therefore, it is not limited to computer science and engineering fields; it will affect all fields. So, shouldn't we study all scientific fields? Of course not. We should adapt to using these tools. Additionally, for computer science and engineering, it's not the end, as computers will continue to expand. Also, the philosophy of NVIDIA , It's like saying, don't learn how to code and limit your innovation to what we provide, and pay us for what we control.

The arab guy is dressed mad scientist stereotype

haha so funny. everyone is now a celebrity because we all have phones with social media and a camera.

Qs someone who is in architecture myself , i m on vacation and is actually the first time in months after my first sem that i am actually sleeping peacefully 5 days in a row

is this a "someone built the fridge, but coca cola makes the money" moment

prohibiting learning to code is a black campaign, just like prohibiting learning physics

It takes about a week to learn to program in C, and a lifetime to master. Same as everything else.

Who will code AI..😂

You know the truth, everyone is becoming experts with AI and the future will produce incredible scholars. That is the stark truth but it depends on the people.❤❤❤

Yes, AI will handle the code; you just explain them how you want it. this is just starting of AI. Learning programming language is time-consuming, and can't remember everyhing even if you master it.

I think humans need to take a course in Philosophy and theology to question the meaning and purpose of all this technology in our lives which will again make our lives more complicated working 60 hours/weekly. When the leading Quantum computing paradigm takes a hold of AI by the neck in a few years time amid the geopolitical tensions god knows what we will be fit for.

I did data analytics and modelling for over 10 years. For 7 years I became a software engineer. I went back to University and completing my BSc in physics maths, and started developing ml models (inlcuding UI) from 1st principals. The amount of challenges is insane, from security, to models (overfitting, issues with python, data cleaning), how fast you can manage the data (database management), the maintenance of the API (dev ops), constantly improve models to improve false positives, managing peoples expectations, api management (UI, server, models). It carries on and on and on....I feel its best to be a jack of all trades rather than a master of one at this stage

What gets executed in a computer is "CODE" not "Dream". :) Agree, time would come when 100% complete code can be generated from language text or image . No body possibly have any perfect plan for that. AI and Generative AI continue to advance, creating robots for personal and commercial use will likely transform industries, but it also raises important questions about the future of human work. Once robots take over repetitive, labor-intensive tasks, humans will likely focus on what ?

Notice the baked in Ageism at 4:45.

That would be like John Baird saying "It's my job to make sure people don't have to learn to read. 🤣

Promotion of his business learning never ends AI is not end of learing

Rich before, programmers will become , once again...a smart librarians..not more. Poor again. With big glasses. AI will do their work from now on.

I code. For now, you do need to know enough coding to double-check the code that AI generates. They still make mistakes but nothing that' can't be tweaked .. hence, that's why you need to know coding for now.. Even now, though, AI saves me LOTS of time and it easily blows through my biggest problem as a human when coding ... procrastination. But, yes ... Jensen is ultimately right. AI will evolve to a point where I won't need to double-check it anymore ... so, I can then spend more time leveraging AI instead of second-guessing and double-checking it.

Do you believe AI is currently capable of creating any complex systems without human coding? While the long-term potential of AI is immense, it's crucial to maintain a grounded perspective. In the near future, AI is more likely to augment human capabilities in complex software development rather than completely replace them. So learning coding or programming is still necessary for some people. Wake up please from dreams.

The more I think about it, coding, programming seems to be going down the route of becoming obsolete. AI is able to surpass human expertise in so many areas, especially with and regarding problem solving. Even though it is going down that route, I still believe it is important. Havng inside knowledge is never a bad thing

Well its the start of 2025, and 2 things to note : 1 - Nvidia earnings are below expectations, and their stock alone is dragging down the DOW average 2 - It is universally recognised already (within actual software development circles) that AI code generation is next to useless at doing what a software developer does Your average software developer would LOVE to have AI that was able to generate good code, and give us some time away from the keyboard, but thats simply not happening. The introduction of AI to programming for example is just making more work for existing developers. So now, instead of grinding 50 hours a week, we are now looking at the usual 50 hrs a week to keep everything working as usual, and then find even more time on top of that to fix up the garbage that AI is pumping out Software development, as of the start of 2025, is more complicated than it was at the start of 2024, which was more complicated than it was at the start of 2023 ... etc And it's not like it's getting dumbed down to the point where you can hire cheap offshore "talent" at $5/hr to help.