C-Squared Clips

Пікірлер

@purv_rana Күн бұрын

Chess is still just as hard a game and if anything its humans who are becoming more intelligent and developing interest in it, Kids are just becoming smarter and we're definitely going to see GMs at the age of 11,10 in near future, Take a look at that little kid Anish solving chesss puzzles at 3 years of age, it wouldn't be a surprise If he achieves GM title at the age of 11,12. Does it mean GM title became easy to achieve? No, its because Kid developed interest in it and is smarter than others.

@bigdick1267 4 күн бұрын

Even if is social versus genetic/ personality... women in general just dont seem to want to sit and think/ focus on something for hours at a time. Certain types of books may keep their attention for a while but games, podcast etc..not so much. Maybe that can be changed with a societal push?? I guess we will see.

@LoRe-nm8gd 4 күн бұрын

Lost the chance to take the handshake while saying "draw?" 😂

@Chris.M 4 күн бұрын

His my goat. I rank him above Carlsen.

@timwheeler8523 3 күн бұрын

Agreed!

@end.olives 5 күн бұрын

Certainly he looks like one

@sofiahenriques3798 5 күн бұрын

It is a mix : men have fewer interests , hormones strike first in woman, we are more risk adverse and therefore games are not so interesting , at some point not so fun to be the only woman and the women only tournaments

@abhi8414 5 күн бұрын

Men discussing why women play less chess is such a clickbait. Atleast get a women for a photo

@end.olives 5 күн бұрын

Because they dont want to. Obvious answer but somehow you need to boost every minority in our brave new world

@WallySoto-yi8fz 6 күн бұрын

Patriarchy! The truth hurts guys! & this is unimpeachable information.

@MrSupernova111 5 күн бұрын

Clueless!

@EGarrett01 6 күн бұрын

Women have less desire to engage in dominance battles. They also have no shortage of intelligence, but appear less often at the extreme low and high ends of the intelligence spectrum, and the high end often is part of what makes world-class level chess players.

@thenoblegnuwildebeest3625 6 күн бұрын

Fewer women. "Less" is used for uncountable nouns, "fewer" is used for countable ones.

@EGarrett01 6 күн бұрын

Language rules are descriptive, not prescriptive. English itself is just a mispronounced version of an earlier language. Apparently Germanic.

@jennystrandqvist1568 5 күн бұрын

kzbin.info/www/bejne/bnjZYXtjq7WiesU

@MrSupernova111 5 күн бұрын

@@EGarrett01 . English is a mix of languages including French and Germanic. Funny thing is the USA has no official language. But whatever.

@LukeJAllen 7 күн бұрын

it looks like Fabi is wearing a shower cap 😆😆

@cliveganda4269 7 күн бұрын

That was funny

@enricocassinelli2974 7 күн бұрын

Totally agree Kasparov is the best chess player ever! He played world championship for 15 years. !! And almost every 2 years. Beside that he he had highest elo rate for 21 years ! Best hands down. Fischer and carlsen came after him imo

@tylerhaddock9583 3 күн бұрын

@@enricocassinelli2974 He played championships about every 4 years, not 2. He won 4 undisputed in 15 years; 6 total in 23 years. Do the math.

@enricocassinelli2974 3 күн бұрын

@ I will Take it easy bro

@robinthomsoncomposer 7 күн бұрын

I think most of the commentators are good but there are a handful who are well above the rest

@adityapacharne5688 7 күн бұрын

Sagar is the reason me and my wife got into chess so idk man

@blackman7186 7 күн бұрын

This is an L take. Fabi is a top players, obviously he's going to find those commentators ridiculous when his understanding of the game is far superior. But commentators are not as good as top players.

@thetunapeckerblues 8 күн бұрын

I loved the commentary of the US championships. Yasser and Christian kept me coming back every day

@slylataupe4272 8 күн бұрын

Of course no, they are mandatory

@System.Error. 8 күн бұрын

depends what u define uselessness

@fundhund62 8 күн бұрын

If the average chess commentary is aimed at players rated "1500 at best", then 99% of commentators are doing a genuinely horrific job.

@grandeypeludo 8 күн бұрын

6:10 I think Chirilă nailed it. This is the case with all sports. Commentators just spew BS is rapid succession to fill the air and make it entertaining and the audience laps it up as if they were presenting the deepest wisdom :) So ... he ended up addressing his own concern. Good job!

@WallySoto-yi8fz 8 күн бұрын

Jesus! Now, criticism towards Fabi is just going to make him unstoppable! Imagine, no talent, almost defeated Magnus during a particular World Chess Championship. Imagine if talent had been there! Now, Fabi knows exactly which gas station he needs, in order to get the ultimate gasoline! Fabi Potter, A Wizard, is what the result of this vilifications will b!

@danielmoskovich2953 8 күн бұрын

I think yes. Most are useless. It's very rare to find really good commentators. But Sagar is great!!

@Youdoyouyeah 8 күн бұрын

Global Chess League was tailored to growing the fan base. So in order to get a random person to get interested you need to be superlative. You have 15-20 seconds with most people’s attention spans to catch them. So yeah, it made sense to “sell” the moment.

@vishalvpv 8 күн бұрын

Chessbase India is the best. Fabi cannot beat Gukesh and C-Squared cannot beat Chessbase India. Feel sad for you guys :)

@sootheseeker 8 күн бұрын

At some point these gm need to realise that having an audience is not bad for ur sport.. .. n commentators are the only way to sync the game with the audience more so than any other sports. Some gm s behave as if having audience n n people being facilitated to enjoy chess is a bad thing.

@mikasa4408 8 күн бұрын

Bro stop embarrassing us indians Grow up

@vishalvpv 8 күн бұрын

@@mikasa4408 you can keep getting emabarrased. Fabi and CSquared started it 🤣.

@Tocinos 8 күн бұрын

"open bob" headahh

@sootheseeker 8 күн бұрын

@@mikasa4408 stop licking up to the westerners bro.. their opinion doesn't mean all that much. Take it with the context..

@quantumechanix7583 8 күн бұрын

people hating on anish making draws is another example of purely narrative driven propaganda

@mayank78207 8 күн бұрын

Exactly!

@crowleylovelet2776 8 күн бұрын

Glad to see u uploading more content lately 😌🥂

@askebe3 8 күн бұрын

Tanya overdoes the hype thing. I can't take anything she says serious

@ssep327 8 күн бұрын

Btw good thumbnail. Yaser is always filling the silence by bs , his suggestion moves are weird and sometimes amateur level and his favouritism towards some and weird hatred towards some others is out of this world unprofessional and cringe

@Young-ep8ik 8 күн бұрын

It’s just you

@ssep327 8 күн бұрын

Dont give the commentators engines during games.(only give them an eval bar). They always ruin the great hype of brilliant moves by player, downgrading it to ok this is the move , can he find it . Worst thing is when they hide they are using engine help for their suggestion. It makes it disgusting

@fundhund62 8 күн бұрын

Keeping the eval bar makes zero sense. Just explain human chess in human terms. It's not even interesting what a 3700 rated engine "thinks" .

@Phoenix.219 8 күн бұрын

@@fundhund62then they will take too much time to explain one move😂 bcz Levy said that even for IMs it gets hard to understand top super GMs games specially if they are playing fast.

@fundhund62 8 күн бұрын

@@Phoenix.219 Let grandmasters comment on grandmaster games. That's been common practice for many decades. They won't have any difficulty explaining the moves.

@Phoenix.219 8 күн бұрын

I don't have issue with that. I have watched Vishy doing commentary and loved it so it's great if that happens @@fundhund62

@ssep327 7 күн бұрын

@fundhund62 give them eval bar so they can spot critical moments and try to solve the puzzle in a human way alongside viewers( and to not miss those moments). To me , it completely makes sense

@ArsMoriendiSynthPop 8 күн бұрын

To give context: I'm a casual player and only play bullet (rated 1954 on lichess atm). Zero knowledge regarding theory (openings, endgames etc). I usually find the commentators (mostly GMS) entertaining but completely useless from a chess point of view. They'll throw things like "ah ok buf if bishop c3 then rook d8" etc without explaining and without obvious (like a 2/3 moves tactic) reason. They just see things that I don't, and comment on it without trying to help me see what they see (maybe because i'd first need to learn a ton of theory...). So... Not blaming them but still: they are useless to me (and to a lot of othzr casual players I suspect).🤷‍♂️

@shounakbanerjee1586 8 күн бұрын

I need commentators who are stronger than me, its enlightening. Or lower rated much then also i like it coz its funny

@jonmetaphorist1327 8 күн бұрын

I can listen to fabi analyze a game for a whole day rather than people read engine moves for even just a second.

@sanmis-h5y 8 күн бұрын

L take

@rahulsrinivas3224 8 күн бұрын

Fabi roasted Sagar Shah

@RonaldREALs 8 күн бұрын

Fabi bring 0 people to chess Sagar brought thousands

@ssep327 8 күн бұрын

This narrative that hikaru injected your minds that bringing people into chess is legendary. Dude that is bs! Thats only good for chess business men , also make a good leverage for people with tribunes to silence opposition voices (like they did with Kramnik, literally depicting a CHESS World Champion as an insane ). Bringing masses into chess just makes real chess players a minority in so called "chess community"! Dont listen to what they say to you , its an evil populist stand to downgrade a game culture classically defined by brilliants