In a similar vein, if you're driving a car and spot an attractive girl/woman, and try to have a crafty little look, she will almost instantly meet your gaze and look you directly in the eyes. How do they know?

who?

@@gives_bad_advice Bob Seamans and James Webb.

@@chrisst8922 Interesting. Thanks.

@@chrisst8922 These guys were so badass.

The problem with your views is that the Soviet Union affirmed that the US went to the moon. If the moon landing was faked, the Soviets would immediately find out (because they had an orbital space station) and tell the entire world about it. "Greedy lying Americans faked their moon mission. Capitalism is a lie" See what I mean? The footage looks bad because its old and in a low gravity environment.

i absolutely love the idea that we somehow had the technology and prowess to fake the moon landings in 1969, and yet somehow, nasa was supposedly so stupid that they failed to take into account even the most basic fundamentals of going to the moon. Like it requires a nanosecond of rational thought to realise that say, you dont think flags should wave on the moon, that perhaps nasa would have also realised that. i mean its not that hard to make a vacuum chamber, and well, you already have the space suits, so if you were going to fake a moon landing, surely you'd at the very least do it in a vacuum chamber so that things like wind werent a factor? but no apparently, in this logic, nasa is just too stupid to properly fake the moon landings, despite being intelligent enough to have some truly insane tech to be able to fake the moon landings in the late 60s. the main reason we cant just "pop back to the moon" today, is that most people who worked on the original moon landings, are no longer here to help, and whilst we have the documents a lot of little things were lost along the way, and unfortunately rocketry is an incredibly precise endeavor. truth be told we probably COULD rebuild the saturn 5 today, but it would require a ton of engineering, a ton of money and a ton of time to modernize the production methods... so if you're going to spend so much time money and engineering anyway, you might as well manufacture a whole new launch system that is more efficient than a rocket from the late 60s. people seem to think that if you can get one rocket to the moon, you can make any moon rocket quickly, thats just not true, every new rocket design has to be rigorously tested and re-tested and redesigned until it works, as you are literally making entirely new technology... and considering that we're trying to focus on more sustainable and economical space flight, i dont think re-manufacturing a launch vehicle that cost over 2 billion dollars per launch in todays money is exactly what you're hoping for

What’s that got to do with the moon landing?

What are you smoking?

No they don't dopey 😂

@@taxpayer_revolt I was being sarcastic

There's a *_HELL_* of a lot more evidence supporting the moon landings beyond "the government said so."

​@@Tim22222That Wendigoon meme struck me while watching this.