This is not an excel program. It is a .NET based desktop application.. And it is not yet available for sales.. Will let u know, once I finalize the product..

Okay sir.

Considering ur building length wise split up is 10x 8m bays.. And m assuming that u r going to brace penultimate bay (last before bay) on each side.. which means the center to center distance of bracing will be 80m - 24m = 56m. Which exceeds 50m, so we need to have 3 braced bays in the building..

Let me know if there is any other difficulty.

Actually creating a course on it.. Kindly sign into the waitlist using the following link.. parishith.systeme.io/17d5f85d

Kindly check out the following page.. The completed packaged programs already available for sales.. structures-simplified.com/download-shop/

Surely will do..

Not at this time.. U can go through emmardeinstitute.com for a course on steel design

Thanks

It's not yet released.. About to be released by next month.. U can reach me out through EMail : [email protected]

There are several courses available online.. Check out emmardeinstitute.com for one such course

@@parishithjayan sir course bHot mahng h, itn paise nh h na

Thanks..

Mail me at [email protected].. Will help u out..

​@@parishithjayan thanks i wrote mail for you.

The basic assumption is that, the force won't transfer from one side of the expansion to the other.. All the forces which arises from one end gable should be carried and transferred within the bracings provided before the expansion joint itself..

Will make an elaborate video on this subject soon

Sir your vedios are very informative....

Thank u.. will upload soon

Noted...

It is upto the ridge. Considering the slope of the building is not less than 0.5:10. The apex of ridge node will act like a rigid joint, so the LZ value can be splitted at that location

Thats a tricky question... You can consider the node to node distance as LZ for the truss members. Considering that the top chord or bottom chord will be transported only as an assembly. If it is going to be a fully bolted truss, then care should be taken at the time of transport and erection so that member does not deform due to slenderness..

U can write a code to change the support condition based on some toggle switch kinda interface.. But commenting and uncommenting the editor file is not yet available in OpenSTAAD

No.. the feature to incorporate American design is not yet introduced..

Will do for sure..

?

Obviously we are going to provide purlins above the rafters and near ridge there will be two purlins closer to the ridge, they try to transfer the force.. And incase if there is no wind column and the building is kind of open, we provide bracings on roof for the stability of the frame along the longitudinal direction.. There won't be much of a calculation subjected to calculating the force.. But there has to be minimum bracings provided on the roof to attain stability..

Don't know what might be the exact cause.. Need to check with Bentley support team for such errors..

The whole point of this video is to avoid modelling with stub and to go with Control/Dependency specification.

3 d model done in what software brother

U mean to ask about the images which is shown in the beginning of the video?

It is a paid tool. For costing and further process, do mail me in the following ID Email: [email protected]

Thank u

@suniljatav1937 The rafter ridge connection is considered as a rigid node and the LZ value for clear span rafter of 25m will be 12.5m.

Daily series in STAAD or OpenSTAAD?

@@parishithjayan open staad

Will start doing..

It's a program which is in progress. Will be released soon. And will let u know. For further informations, contact me on my LinkedIn profile: www.linkedin.com/in/parishith-jayan-985b199a?

@cesayantan sure will do

It's not pinned at the top Mr. Mathew. It's actually free to translate at the top. As per the codal provision, the effective length factor for column is 2. Kindly check the desired clause in the code book.

Why we cannot consider the lateral support from connected members at top.

I meant members are connected at the top. So they restrict translation in lateral directions.

@@tominmathew344 No Mr. Mathew, if it is pinned at the top, then it should not translate at all. But in the actual frame upon having the lateral load, we will see the translation there na. Then in that case how could we consider that as a pinned support? If it is pinned, then it should not translate at all.. Hope u understand

The entire column and lateral members will be translating in that condition. If the column independently translates, then it’s not restrained.

It is not going to affect much of the result. STAAD performs stiffness matrix analysis based on the nodal positions and members. The final erected building will be of the shape in which the top flange will be exactly aligned to the desired slope. So analysing the model in that manner is going to yield the exact results that the structure is about to incur after erection..

U can contact me through mail.. [email protected]

@ssr10001 Kindly mail me in the above I'd. We will get in touch..

Basically, the rods are slender members which are not intended to take any compression force. Once the bracing force reaches those points, they try to push the rod and since they are slender, they can't withstand this force or they can't transfer this force, so they buckle away means losing its capacity to transfer the bracing force through compression. Then the force tries to find the new path to reach bottom. So it travels along the line of action, and once it reaches the second rafter, the alternate pair of brace rods gets activated and resist the load through tension. The same for wall bracings as well.. go through the video once again and try to make a simple bracing model in STAAD and study the behaviour to understand the concept.

@@parishithjayan Thank U soo much Sir for your kind reply...

Thanks.

The program is not yet complete. It does not create bracing members. Once I configure everything the program will be made available to purchase at structures-simplified.com. Meanwhile, you can check out other programs in the store.

You r right. The idea is not to produce everything using ChatGPT. The video just shows one among the possibility on how we can utilize chatGPT. For more complex models, we might require a well trained independent local models. We can't find solution for all our problems at one place..

@@parishithjayan absolute!

@zahraagha3667 It will. Here we are just training the GPT model to recreate the STAAD input file. So, it will definitely work.

Thank u

Then the height of brick wall need to be considered as the unsupported length for the minor axis..

True that..

True

Was testing it's capabilities and reliability. Will definitely make one, if the testing goes well

Just follow code. As per IS 800, for the strut or bracing member subjected to wind or seismic loads where there is a possibility for the reversal of stresses, need to check the tensile slenderness ratio for 350

@@parishithjayan thank you !!

Sure.. will do..

@chetansonkar3601 Truly speaking, I dont know Hindi.

@maheshg5516 Will make a video on this topic soon.

@@parishithjayan thank you

It is not launched yet. M actually testing the program. Will launch it in the mid of January.

@@parishithjayan please upload soon, cause i am into PEB for few years, and it feels hectic to trial and error of build up sections to optimize