Is it required that we go to diff churches or just one?
@therealistguide48663 күн бұрын
There is only one day on which you can get the indulgence by praying at a church. The other days, you have to go to a cemetery to pray.
@choopsk67346 күн бұрын
If you get sick, do you choose to go to the hospital because of the Mary statue out front or because of the science going on inside.
@simonewilliams72246 күн бұрын
God will show SSPX the way to move forward. Pray.
@simonewilliams72246 күн бұрын
Stand fast with Jesus Christ and the Church of our four fathers before 1950.
@martin-4587 күн бұрын
"From what We have said, it follows that no authority whatsoever, save that which is proper to the Supreme Pastor, can render void the canonical appointment granted to any bishop; that no person or group, whether of priests or of laymen, can claim the right of nominating bishops; that no one can lawfully confer episcopal consecration unless he has received the mandate of the Apostolic See.[18] 48. Consequently, if consecration of this kind is being done contrary to all right and law, and by this crime the unity of the Church is being seriously attacked, an excommunication reserved specialissimo modo to the Apostolic See has been established which is automatically incurred by the consecrator and by anyone who has received consecration irresponsibly conferred" - Ad Apostolorum Principis, Pope Pius XII
@edwardkornuszko40837 күн бұрын
Thank you
@truckingroadrunner88537 күн бұрын
Dear Father, are we then to vote for the lesser of two evils, or do we not vote at all?
@therealistguide48667 күн бұрын
You can do either. There is no moral obligation to vote when choosing between two evils but you are permitted to vote for the lesser of two evils. It is a choice between stopping a greater evil and protesting against a pro-abortion candidate (by not voting or by voting third party).
@truckingroadrunner88537 күн бұрын
@@therealistguide4866 thanks for replying Father 👍🏻
@76katster7 күн бұрын
Three Ave’s for you Father!
@marietheresa17097 күн бұрын
Thank you Father
@zahzahzee8 күн бұрын
Even more disobedience from the society. Shame on all of you.
@butterflybeatles8 күн бұрын
Democracy (rule of the People) divides. Only Monarchy unites.
@micook32048 күн бұрын
May GOD bless you Father 🙏✝️
@butterflybeatles8 күн бұрын
There are two forms of government: Monarchy and Oligarchy.
@NatalieHudspeth-Storey8 күн бұрын
Thank you for your excellent sermon on our duties as Catholics in light of the state of our country. Christ is King, indeed.
@handlemozart13 күн бұрын
The Resistance doesn't seem have any problems consecrating bishops.
@E.C.214 күн бұрын
Thank God for the Thuc line Resistance-SSPX and Mendez line. Why do you all crave respect from Heretics? +Fellay and company are letting their valid Apostolic Succession die off. FSSP/ICK are not validily Ordained by traditional Rite Bishops.
@edwardkornuszko408314 күн бұрын
Archbishop Lefebvre pray for us!
@seli38515 күн бұрын
Vigano was consecrated a true bishop
@seli38515 күн бұрын
It is such a great shame that bishop Williamson is thrown under the bus by his own. So sad
@imeldatobin724315 күн бұрын
I agree!
@E.C.214 күн бұрын
+Williamson is the only 1 of the 4 who uphold and pass on tradition. Deo Gratias he is still validily Consecrating Bishops!.
@StanislausJoseph202115 күн бұрын
Protéctor sanctæ Ecclésiæ, ora pro nobis.
@StAnthonyPaduaRadTrad15 күн бұрын
Does Francis profess the Catholic Faith or not? Is the Novus Ordo Catholic or not? If it isn’t (and if he isn’t) why seek his approval to consecrate more valid bishops? If he and the Novus Ordo is Catholic, then why not submit to him and his Novus Ordo? And why go through the charade of asking him if the SSPX is going to do it regardless? It is dishonest. Let your yes be yes and your no be no
@jwm631414 күн бұрын
Do you know Obedience? Charity? They must offer Rome the opportunity to do the right thing. They must still submit to Rome. We are Roman Catholic. It's the difference between rebellion out of pride and resistance out of conscience.
@StAnthonyPaduaRadTrad14 күн бұрын
@@jwm6314 is it Catholic to follow and obey modernists (heretics)?
@dariusclovis137414 күн бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/rGGxZ4xslt6siNE Bergoglio preaches a poisonous doctrine that leads to eternal damnation. You (SSPX) condemn this doctrine, and thereby gain the sympathy of the true believers. But in retrospect, you are urging them to submit to a manifest heretic and to obey this usurper of the papacy. This is unacceptable, because many regard you as a true voice and do not suppose that you are leading them down the road to perdition. Dear SSPX stop & think and realize your irrational/illogical position.
@E.C.214 күн бұрын
Obedience to heresy idolatry and Apostasy? The SSPX is lost and looks like doubtful Novus Ordo so called "Bishops" will take over after the remaining 2 die off.
@kstewskis16 күн бұрын
The Law of NonContradiction must always prevail, the Church does not contradict itself, or it does not exist. The mission of the Church is for the salvation of souls. Archbishop LeFevbre did what he did because his primary interest was the salvation of souls.
@jared_186716 күн бұрын
@@kstewskis Ask yourself: if the church is not providing for the salvation of souls, such that the SSPX must do it, hasn’t the church defected?
@johnnyproctor16 күн бұрын
Saint Robert Bellarmine, Doctor of the Catholic Church: "Second. I say that, as you know, the Council [of Trent] prohibits expounding the Scriptures contrary to the common agreement of the holy Fathers. And if Your Reverence would read not only the Fathers but also the commentaries of modern writers on Genesis, Psalms, Ecclesiastes and Josue, you would find that all agree in explaining literally (ad litteram) that the sun is in the heavens and moves swiftly around the earth, and that the earth is far from the heavens and stands immobile in the center of the universe. Now consider whether in all prudence the Church could encourage giving to Scripture a sense contrary to the holy Fathers and all the Latin and Greek commentators." (Letter to Foscarini)
@nidusaquilae7617 күн бұрын
Fr. Paul Robinson, please answer, does all of this sound like the words of someone who negated sedevacantism and "fought against it?" Sounds like rather the words of someone who was rather open to the possibility as such and rightfully so as any thinking Catholic should be.
@nidusaquilae7617 күн бұрын
On the other hand, we have never wished to belong to this system which calls itself the Conciliar Church, and defines itself with the Novus Ordo Missæ, an ecumenism which leads to indifferentism and the laicization of all society. Yes, we have no part, nullam partem habemus, with the pantheon of the religions of Assisi; our own excommunication by a decree of Your Eminence or of another Roman Congregation would only be the irrefutable proof of this. We ask for nothing better than to be declared out of communion with this adulterous spirit which has been blowing in the Church for the last 25 years; we ask for nothing better than to be declared outside of this impious communion of the ungodly. We believe in the One God, Our Lord Jesus Christ, with the Father and the Holy Ghost, and we will always remain faithful to His unique Spouse, the One Holy Catholic Apostolic and Roman Church.
@nidusaquilae7617 күн бұрын
“The Church that affirms such errors is at once schismatic and heretical. This Conciliar Church is, therefore, not Catholic. To whatever extent Pope, Bishops, priests, or faithful adhere to this new Church, they separate themselves from the Catholic Church.”[ - ABL
@nidusaquilae7617 күн бұрын
“We are suspended a divinis by the Conciliar Church and for the Conciliar Church, to which we have no wish to belong. That Conciliar Church is a schismatic Church, because it breaks with the Catholic Church that has always been. It has its new dogmas, its new priesthood, its new institutions, its new worship, all already condemned by the Church in many a document, official and definitive…. " - ABL - 1976
@nidusaquilae7617 күн бұрын
"Then this problem arises. First problem: communicatio in sacris. Second problem: the question of heresy. Third problem: is the pope still pope when he is heretical? I do not know, I am not making a decision! But you can ask yourselves the question. I think that any sensible man must ask himself the question. I do not know." - ABL, 1986
@nidusaquilae7617 күн бұрын
"But who is making the schism? Not me! To make a schism, you have to leave the Church. And leaving the Church means leaving the faith first. Who is leaving the faith of the Church? Authority is at the service of faith. If it abandons the faith, it is the one making the schism. So, it is not us who are making the schism." - ABL- 1986
@nidusaquilae7617 күн бұрын
"But it is possible that we will be obliged to believe that this pope is not pope." - ABL, 1986
@jared_186717 күн бұрын
“It shall not be lawful for any bishop, under the plea of any privilege [what]soever, to exercise pontifical functions in the diocese of another, save by the express permission of the Ordinary of the place, and in regard to those persons only who are subject to that same Ordinary: if the contrary shall have been done, the bishop shall be ipso facto suspended from the exercise of episcopal functions, and those so ordained (be similarly suspended) from the exercise of their orders.” - Council of Trent. For as much as the SSPX reveres Trent, it explicitly condemns what Fr Robinson describes here.
@lukes225416 күн бұрын
we're looking at the literal arian crisis 2.0 with the conciliar church, and you think what SSPX bishops do is illicit?
@jared_186716 күн бұрын
@@lukes2254 Arianism was recognized and condemned as a heresy by the Church. Vatican II was solemnly promulgated by the pope and by every one of his predecessors. Not even remotely the same thing. The crisis we are in today is caused by materialism, secularism, and atheism, and as shocking as it may sound, Vatican II was actually called to address that. And yes, what the SSPX bishops do is illicit. You won’t find any justification for it in church history or in canon law. It’s been explicitly condemned at several other councils as well.
@carolineleavitt436317 күн бұрын
You're dreaming that the Vatican will give the SSPX a bishop ! And at our parish nothing is said about The atrocities going on at the Vatican! It's like SSPX has been silenced! The priest cozies up to the local bishop in hope of using their churches and the people are lulled into walking all over the body of Christ as communion in the hand is the norm in the Novus Ordo! No agreement with The Vatican till it comes back to the Faith!
@r.e.gamache717517 күн бұрын
Thank you, Fr. Robinson! God bless you and the necessary work of the SSPX!
@realjuanpflores17 күн бұрын
1:53 Bishop Thuc: "Am I a joke to you?"
@ransomcoates54617 күн бұрын
Emphatically yes. He was bonkers.
@76katster17 күн бұрын
@@ransomcoates546Did you know it is a sin to speak of clergy, consecrated men, in such a derogatory fashion?
@realjuanpflores17 күн бұрын
@@ransomcoates546 Calumny can be a mortal sin. The burden is on you to prove insanity. You have no positive proof that the bishop was “bonkers,” for example, at the 1981 consecration of Fr. Carmona. Dismissing His Excellency’s heroic efforts as a “joke” shows what side you are on.
@nidusaquilae7617 күн бұрын
@@ransomcoates546 Prove it. Have you ever seen evidence of it? Many who knew him and were with him say the opposite. Are you guilty of calumny?
@kstewskis16 күн бұрын
Bearing false witness about someone who you have no clue about, let alone a consecrated Bishop with a papal mandate is no laughing matter. It’s a mortal sin. @@ransomcoates546
@OLPH197917 күн бұрын
Thank you, Father Robinson. God Bless you.
@etc377617 күн бұрын
God protects the Catholic Church. The Traditional Catholic movement will not die. God bless the SSPX for their fidelity.
@lovesrlady217 күн бұрын
Thank you for posting this.🥳
@CaptBritNZ17 күн бұрын
Campos was given a traditional bishop, consecrated in the traditional rite, Bishop Rifan
@nidusaquilae7617 күн бұрын
Consecrated by a Novus Ordo bishop. Rifan was not Traditional. And look how quickly he caved. The priestly administration of St. John Vianney is done. What a joke. Look at him now.
@CaptBritNZ17 күн бұрын
@nidusaquilae76 well one of the bishops that consecrated Rifan was consecrated by fellay and Tissier, so just because a cardinal was thr principal consecrator it shouldn't matter, lefebvre said their orders are valid
@nidusaquilae7616 күн бұрын
@@CaptBritNZ You should know what you talk about. Firstly you speak of Licinio Rangel who was not consecrated by Fellay but by Bp. Tissier de Mallerais. And being a co-consecrator, they do not "consecrate" or say the words of the form of the ordination. They are there to ensure the rite is carried out and followed and to assist the principal consecrator. Ap. Lefebvre had nothing to say about Bp. Rifan or the validity of his consecration, who was "consecrated" in 2002, 11 years after Lefebvre's death.
@CaptBritNZ16 күн бұрын
@@nidusaquilae76 In the traditional rite, co consecrators do say the words, and do the rite with the principle, I am a Dominican Clerical Brother, I study liturgy. I agree with SSPX but just think father misspoke and to be fair without 1988 Econe, Campos wouldn’t exist since like you said tissier had to continue Mayers legacy with Rangal
@capybarapullup123314 күн бұрын
He is not Traditional, he says the NO and is a complete sell out
@Makeitliquidfast17 күн бұрын
I'm positive that Christ will protect the society, I attend all forms at the moment and will continue to pray that a positive outcome will happen.
@NatalieHudspeth-Storey18 күн бұрын
Thank you, Fr. Robinson, for the reassurance.
@catholicsweetness27 күн бұрын
Thank you for this wonderful teaching Father!
@tpor1206Ай бұрын
Excellent sermon. Thank you Father! 🙏🏻
@mylipsreadАй бұрын
Wasn’t the lamb slain before the foundation of the world ? (Revelation). The cross is all time even before time, reflecting the character of sacrificial love of God, which does not change
@therealistguide4866Ай бұрын
The Crucifixion happened at one point in time, but the people in the Old Testament received grace from Our Lord's death in anticipation of the graces it would earn.
@malvarado5955Ай бұрын
Water has no power !!!
@therealistguide4866Ай бұрын
It does if God gives power to it.
@claudiaburnside9751Ай бұрын
Thank you, Father Robinson. I pray to become more like Jesus with every communion.
@gggvgg4302Ай бұрын
Thank you Father another beautiful homily. Ave Maria, gratia plena!
@TheGenoveva7Ай бұрын
You are truly a gift from God, Fr Robinson. I learn something new every time i listen to your homily. God bless.
@LectioSacracatolicoАй бұрын
Deo Gratias
@r.e.gamache7175Ай бұрын
Marian Consecration, uniting our hearts with the Immaculate Heart of Mary, our Blessed Mother and Queen of Heaven and Earth, these are so important for salvation, Fr. Robinson. Thank you for this sermon, and God bless!