This is the most accurate of all these portrayals.
@chivonfortney16565 күн бұрын
❤
@writtwoodson68796 күн бұрын
I appreciate that the producers of this video did not fall for the fallacies of Jefferson scholars, like Annette Gordon-Reed, and those who work for the Thomas Jefferson Foundation (Foundation). For 150 years historians denied that the sexual liaison between Sally Hemings and Thomas Jefferson. In the year 2000 the movie Sally Hemings was viewed by 20 million Americans on CBS. Leading historians and the Foundation partly capitulated. They recognized the liaison, but still denied that Tom was the son of either Hemings or Jefferson. First the history then the DNA Newsman James Callender wrote an article for a Richmond newspaper, Sept. 1, 1802. He wrote T.J. had a concubine named Sally. Sally had a son named Tom - 12 years old. Callender said that she had more children, but Callender never named them. Historians like Annette Gordon-Reed (Pulitzer Prize) say that the baby died soon after being born. Think about it. The baby was born in 1790 right after they returned from France. If the baby died, then why was Callender writing about him in 1802? Somebody has a bogus story. Also, in 1802 a man named Thomas Gibbons wrote a letter to a politician saying that T.J. and Sally gave birth to Tom, Hariot, and Beverly. If the baby died why was Gibbons writing about him in 1802? The newspapers never named the other two kids, so Gibbons had his own info. The 1870 U S census for Jackson Co. OH indicates that Thomas Woodson was born in 1790 in Virginia. He owned a 382-acre farm in Ohio; he and his wife Jemima raised 11 children including Sarah Jane, who was the first black American to teach at a historically black college or university. The Woodson family has never lost its history. Fawn Brodie’s Jefferson biography sold 350,000 copies in 1974; Barbara Chase -Riboud’s novel Sally Hemings sold over one million copies in 1979. The movie Jefferson in Paris was screened coast to coast in 1995. Historians such as Joseph Ellis started calling for DNA tests in 1997. Jefferson historians have never excepted the evidence in Brodie’s book. Those historians don’t like the historic record. Byron Woodson was one of the DNA donors. He is a first-hand witness. Dr Foster, the testing organizer, promised the DNA donors that historians would be kept away from the DNA process. Historians had never handled the history honestly, so the donors wanted them kept away. The testing and laboratory work may have been perfect, but the reporting was hijacked by historian Joseph Ellis and others. Dr. Foster was distraught when he learned that he had lost control. After Woodson learned that things had gone astray, Foster answered Woodson's pointed questions honestly and never failed to answer the telephone. Foster did not know Ellis. When Ellis and news outlets, like U. S. News and World Report were preparing a media dump, Foster thought the DNA results were still secret. (B. Woodson, A President in the Family, 2001, 221-29) Ellis appeared as the star of a massive multi-media media dump, reporting the reputed DNA results Nov. 1st and 2nd 1998. Ellis appeared on PBS News Hour Nov. 2, 1998, announcing "...the scientific evidence that we have now generated." Again, DNA donors had been promised that historians would be kept away from the process, knowing of their untrustworthy track record. Foster sent a letter objecting the handling of the matter to Nature (magazine) and the Washington Post reported that Foster had issued a written objection. (Leef Smith, WAPO, 1/6/99) Foster told Woodson, "I don't know," when his project was breached, thus Foster did not know if the Nature article reported the actual results or not. Ellis was later embroiled in a scandal which forced him out of his teaching job for a year and caused him to admit that he is a habitual liar. (Cox, Chronicle of Higher Education, 7/13/2001) The Thomas Jefferson Foundation embraced a hijacked DNA report announced by an admitted habitual liar. Is that best practices?
@CORLEONESPORTS976 күн бұрын
ma barker is a turn on .lol
@JS-nt8rz7 күн бұрын
😊😊
@godschild61728 күн бұрын
Thank you for the video
@cyberelf86279 күн бұрын
Only vietnam won the mongol empire.
@sherinfernando926311 күн бұрын
People talk like this now about Ann. ..but if a teacher acted like Ann did today that teacher would be charged for child abuse, fired from the position and may be fined and jailed.
@jeremyhodge621611 күн бұрын
Jane Russell was a one of a kind actress. Happy heavenly Birthday to her 😌🎂🎁🎊🎉🎈👌💯
@robinsommers336616 күн бұрын
YAHWEH
@Giapink00021 күн бұрын
Truth
@patrickmacisaac22224 күн бұрын
so freaking sick of these total crap AI voice crap videos
@wendylederer36724 күн бұрын
I don’t want to learn about important history from a robot that’s insulting on so many levels!
@kevin-kingadu2080Ай бұрын
Rip
@user-pl5ce2bm4sАй бұрын
I love love love her music. It resonates It takes me back. I grew up listening to it. She was so sexy ❤🙂😍🎉
@JosephLevy-kv6dlАй бұрын
Joe Jackson belongs in Cooperstown
@airenejaurigue2892Ай бұрын
❤❤❤ i love perfume of elizabeth arden..very first perfume i receive when i was in high school
@TinyflydepositАй бұрын
I couldnt listen to that horrible robotic voice. Such a shame, I adore Conrad
@user-be4fu5um2fАй бұрын
Трагична. Съдба.
@No_GaslightingАй бұрын
A transvestigation is definitely in order for John oops Joan.
@joevasquez3434Ай бұрын
It's not Poolzer Prize; it's Pulitzer Prize; ... How do these idiots not do there research, or learn how to pronounce simple words before recording narration ?!?!
@um9272Ай бұрын
A shit !!!!!!!!
@BangkokVoiceCoachАй бұрын
Why the A.I. narration? Awful. I zapped it after one sentence.
@nycarrhythmiacarepllc7894Ай бұрын
These computerized voices need to be banned!
@MariaGarcia-pl3tdАй бұрын
The pictures are not of Dorothy, but Mary Jackson
@dancelli714Ай бұрын
Not everything wa BIG EYES with her. The non big eyes woks with her with her were very good
@jamesdemasi7077Ай бұрын
We watch him.
@freddyfurrah37892 ай бұрын
FUCK YOUR COMMERCIALS
@ebenclukey72932 ай бұрын
DON'T LISTEN TO ROBOTS...
@TheNecessaryEvil2 ай бұрын
Part of the klan, therefore a Democrat. Dems created the klan. ☕️
@philliprehn-tq5zb2 ай бұрын
😊
@oolong7412 ай бұрын
Robot
@ednaalves99082 ай бұрын
My favorite star love Tracy Chapman 🌞👏🌟🍀✨🙏🏼
@jamesdemasi70772 ай бұрын
Tight jeans look sexy on you.
@jamesdemasi70772 ай бұрын
🌠
@vickilane89712 ай бұрын
My favorite celeb. I love him!!❤😊
@bajavolvo2 ай бұрын
AI bot garbage
@mrsturtevant12 ай бұрын
At the end of the film list, I was gonna say "how can monotone AI lady forget Cars?!"
@clacla7072 ай бұрын
the english subtittles aren't the right ones
@user-yh7kf8su3t2 ай бұрын
En español, por favor 😢
@howardrussell39192 ай бұрын
Ma Barker and her son Fred were one of the last Depression era gangsters to be killed. In order, it was Bonnie and Clyde in Louisiana in May, 1934. Next up was John Dillinger in July, 1934 in Chicago(of course!). Then Pretty Boy Floyd in October, 1934 near Youngtown, Ohio. After Floyd was Baby Face Nelson in November, 1934 in Barrington, Illinois, which of course is near Chicago! Finally, Ma Barker and her son Fred in Florida, January 1935. I knew the stories of these people from various movies, but had no idea that they all got whacked within months of each other. The Barker Brothers and their buddy Alvin Karpis stuck up my old job, The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago in September of 1933 and killed a beat cop while making their getaway to the WEST SIDE. Everyone thinks Chicago is a tough town. What they don't realize is that it's always been that way!!
@scottbivins47582 ай бұрын
He not only got us involved in World War 1 but he also got involved in what Russia had going on at the time because remember they had a revolution. The polar bear expedition is another war he got us involved in.
@madycat712 ай бұрын
What Audrey Hepburn pics have to do with Coco???? This is stupid and dumb😤😠