I made a mistake in the trivia section. Sean Young was cast as Vicki Vale in Batman 89 and had to drop out due to a horse-riding accident, Annette Benning dropped out due to being pregnant.

Dont watch the second one. In my opinion it only devalues the first one which is a great classic

I said this on another posting, but it's worth repeating: Seriously? Seriously?

And the show Cobra Kai pissed on him

You know that him being the dad is heavily implied in the first one right? Like I think it's a pretty common assumption at the time that it was his kid. I think the second was was 100% unnecessary and not that great, but that wasn't the issue.

How could they do this!!?? Popeye is a role model and icon. Whoever made this movie should FIRED!!!!

No.

worst edited video ever...do you realized it is impossile to understand right?

Looks pretty good for a horror movie

What would Ned's gf do? Turn into a "I spit in your grave" type of BS? It's based on a true story, she was graped by a drug lord who pays the police and quite literally owns the Cidade de Deus. Real victims just go far away and try to start again, they really just want to "disappear" and leave the past behind. Stop with the stupidity, wanting women representation in a gang violence movie based on a true story from the 70s is TOO dumb, even for first worlders who know nothing about real life

I def agree on the point of it feeling a lot like a comedy at points, during my initial watch I never really saw it like that but on rewatched i'd notice how witty and funny the characters were. Great review, looking forward to seeing you guys review more!

I'm intruiged, Hugh Grant is NOT someone I would expect to see in a horror movie either!

Chris Latta voice iconic

It should always throw a red flag if a total stranger is too friendly or welcoming to their home.

Mr. Reed = incel dumbledore

Frankie Fucko 🤮

It had to be Eric and Shelly because Rupert was doing the comic and it’s a sequel to the TV movie and show that is why and Vincent is part of a bigger group called Lazarus

The movie is incredible the biggest problem is everyone is saying it’s a remake and attaching it to the Brandon lee movie when it’s a sequel and set in the stairway to heaven universe that is the biggest problem it’s the best of the franchise I absolutely loved it mark is a much better eric then Brandon lee and the stair way to heaven TV movie is the only remake that exists it did so good on the ratings we got a full 1 and a 2nd season was green lit and production and filming started before universal studios stopped the series dead in its tracks and Rupert did this fantastic sequel

Whoever did the marketing for this movie needs to be fired and blacklisted from every marketing company 😭

I forgot to mention that the cult in AZRAEL remind me of the Seraphites in The Last of Us 2, down to the parts where you're sneaking around them.

Unfortunately, producers only listen to how much cash a film earns. T1 didn't earn enough cash, which us why people keep seeing and preferring bayformers.

I just watched this episode and it was another great one. I am really enjoying seeing Colin Farrell in this role and when he lit them on fire, I was stunned and watching his face was a master class in acting. This show is killing it, literally, and I love it. I am hoping to see more of it but I have read that Farrell is not on board because the suit is so heavy. We will see.

I feel everything y’all are saying. They just need to make good stories with no studio meddling. I just rewatched Godzilla Minus One and Prey again. Those 2 movies give me a slither of hope for the future of big franchises.

For me it's a great film because it isn't just body horror. The acting and script mean it's a powerful drama. I'm still puzzled why the herd mentality on KZbin insists on The Thing being superior. In general some seem to obsess over certain films and ignore others, the same with the hype over Rear Window. Though I definitely find Rear Window way better than The Thing Hitchcock did great things people ignore.

I can't believe you didn't ask me to do this! Rude!

I had the same ‘superhero gone wrong’ comment with my wife😂. I’m glad my algorithm found you guys.

My husband just showed me this channel. You guys are like our sister channel. He's always showing me movies and games I've never seen. We should do something together!!🖤

never show me this shit agene

It didn't portray Joker like people expect him to be, a super diabolical, crafty villain. Arthur Fleck isn't that, and people just can't seem to be able to separate the Joker Arthur inspires and Fleck. This is one of those movies that will be loved in time.

I like how you guys are keeping it fun!

Well, granted the killer kid killed after both of his parents were killed, ha. It was a dorky version but I gotta say that I stilled liked it a lot.

This was a good review. Thanks for it.

is it actually that bad? Yes it is

I don’t think anyone can REALLY say how they feel about this movie (from a ‘Salems Lot perspective) if they have never read the book..They can only review it for what it is..A generic vampire movie.. I am not saying that you guys are doing that on your channel, but I have seen ALOT of KZbinrs reviewing it like they know so much about the lore, then they turn around and say that they haven’t ever read the book (or even watched the ‘79 miniseries for that matter), and then I just start laughing..Like they just want to sound cool or something by acting like they know so much about the real story, then go on to say they haven’t ever read the novel..UGH! I don’t know why that irritates me so much, haha..

It was so bad, it felt like Goosebumps. That killer kid made the vampires so non-threatening. This 11 year old sees his dead friend fly up, mind control him and try to attack him and he doesn't even flinch, he's like "Tell your master I'm coming for his head!". When they had this 11 year old get into a car he shouldn't know how to drive, he could barely see over the steering wheel but he somehow Tokyo Drifts through the support beams, I was cackling. It's so goofy, like they wanted to make a PG/PG-13 power fantasy for kids.

You two would be better reviewers if you only take tripped-out gummies after filming. The guy is way better at this than the girl (who seemed high MFer), who appeared out of it leaning over and talking "like so slow" Lol. I wish you better luck next time.

Salem's Lot version from 1979 was still for me the scary one and being young at the time and watching with my dad at 9pm made this very special its a time i treasure.

This movie was terrible! 😂😂😂

The kid who played Danny Glick in the movie is actually NOT the same actor in The Boys. That's his identical twin brother!

Was ok version of the story. Some good unique pieces. Story moved fast; left gaps. I'd like to see another with the cast.

Came for the reaction stayed for the 8-bit batman nes music. Nice deep cut.

Loved the book....didn't hate this. It follows the book pretty close until the climax where it just does it's own thing. Definitely worth a read tho.

Thanks for a great review, I always enjpy a team opion. Keep up the great work, I'll keep my open for your all next one.

Look up the Prankxta World Review lol 😂

It was horrible. I had to FF through all the songs.

Joker 2 is not a good movie.

Watch Batman returns next!

Jack did great but Mark Hamill still the best Joker to me. Especially when it comes to the laugh

How can a sex-ploitaion film effectively do battle with…sex-ploitation? How can actresses who radically conform to beauty standards (via plastic surgery) be integral exemplars for young women? Why would any integral actress participate in, and promote, a sex-ploitation/Roman Colloseum flick? Will this movie stop women of all ages, from the natural desire, of wanting to appear beautiful in public? Will a sexy girl running around in her underwear make viewers think differently about sexual assault? The trailer for ‘The Substance’ promises titillation galore for teenage boys and dirty old men, under the guise of ‘social critique’. How far is this tactic from the films produced by the American Social Hygiene Association, at the beginning of the 20th century? The males will leave this film with ‘flesh on the mind’ and the females with ‘cosmetics on the mind’. Which ideology or cause, could justify prostituting images of a woman’s nubile contours, to over a billion viewers? Successful actresses build their career on character, rather than contours (i.e. Angela Lansbury). Filmmakers who genuinely love women, provide opportunities for their feminine strength of character to shine. Misogynistic filmmakers expose bodily contours and then proceed to tear them apart for the viewer’s perverse delight. My favourite Demi Moore film is ‘One Crazy Summer’. I would like to see more films like ‘Howard’s End’ or ‘Trust’ where the women are given something edifying to do… While the filmmakers are patting themselves on the back, for simply reinforcing ‘the male gaze’, here are some valid criticisms: “But for all its feminist diatribes, The Substance is still a movie that is 80 percent extreme close-ups of Margaret Qualley’s arse. In nearly every other scene, the camera lovingly pans over her spandex-clad exterior, in sequences that are shot like ‘90s Viagra commercials” (Inverse.com). "The Substance’s presentation is as shallow as the very thing it’s critiquing. There’s no compassion, and certainly no catharsis - just more hagsploitation and a sense of déjà vu." (Hannah Strong) "An overuse of stale horror conventions in an already predictable plot-combined with decades-old, thoroughly unchallenging ideas about women’s relationships to their bodies-leads to a film that claims to support its protagonist, while treating her like the butt of the joke at every turn...I will not deny that Margaret Qualley is great to look at, but Fargeat undermines her film’s satirical point by catering to the same male gaze that the script claims to despise so deeply. Fargeat isn’t quite sure what she wants to say about women’s relationships to their body and images of their body, so she falls back on simply showing us that Margaret Qualley is hot.” (Paste Magazine) 'After two hours and 20 minutes of flamboyantly repulsive variations on this well-worn theme, even the strongest-stomached and most feminist of viewers could be excused for muttering, We get it already." (Slate Magazine)

Great review, felt the same way in regards of the 2 movies.