Should't K2 also have a dT term attached to it?

At 9:05, aren't you missing a dT in the x-term for the new point? It should be Xi + (dT / 2)*(K1 + K2) as mentioned in the last bullet point?

Gege is terrible at explaining abilities

I have been learning this at school the past year, why did I understand this better than my teachers lessons

are the bills really that height

How does the beating of infinity work then?

Now do accelerator.

Thanks for this. I'll implement this to orbit trajectory

Other way to see it is that Gojo is basically tangential function no? The closer it is to touching Gojo, the more force you need to give, until it becomes "infinity force needed"

Ain't no way I understood math from a jjk YT video instead of my teacher when he's yapping on a Monday morning💀

imagine not to understand 8th grade math and searching for videos like that

Could u maybe cover the maths in the k drama melancholia?

I was wondering why is there a slur (for my language atleast) word in a science video

what

everytime im sitting for a test, i think about this show specifically the whole final exams arc. but i never really understood it until now. i just hope my final exam for this senior year wont have that question. if i see that on my paper ill genuinely cry as i try to remember this vid lol

Gojo can position where the barrier of his infinity is. So its more him making people approach an x distance, lets just say 5 cm, away from him, but never reaching it, not so much approaching him.

I like to think about it as the Black holes paradox . every thing that gets to close to it it slows down .

As a 10th grader it made no sense until the end.

6:32 this is misleading with the visual. A_tot = A_close + A_far + area of leftover black regions in the square. Those black regions have area 0 meaning that A_close and A_far cannot be circular. Both the anime and the video have misleading visualiation of the domain being spherical in Karma's method.

Gojo is an asymptote is crrazy

tbh, I like zenos paradox in jojos better

My personal favourite top 1 anime after Dr stone 😊

I like how the mathematics behind simple cubic crystals are hidden in this.

I had started with assassination classroom but had to stop due to busy schedule. I love it so far, it's far more intriguing than I expected. Also I really loved your video, it was spoiler for me though but it's ok. I probably will forget till I continue the manga. Also I wanted to ask which application or software you used for explaining that geometry. Can you please say?

Wouldnt this make goko a living particle accelerator?

Please do one for Infinite Mage. It's a manhwa based on magic derived from mathematics, quantum physics and more. Please do!!!!!!!

Sounds quality is very very bad

u just had to show manga spoilers for all the anime only watchers

i think it's reasonable to assume, physically not mathematically, that spacetime is not infinitely divisible. given that things can touch and move past, and exist as they do. but Gojo's power makes it infinitely divisible.

(((Oh By Allah You Have Wasted My Time)))

This is just a convergent series as a Geometric progression with absolutely decreasing terms.

Now imagine if he would have used Talk No Jutsu? The solution would have gone hard.

damn I have never understood RK methods before, just knew that they are better than Euler’s. after you explained the explicit and implicit methods I was like ”why don’t you just average them” - and apparently that’s already RK2!

Always this phrasing. Nothing is governed by differential equations. Differential equations are part of a language that is made to describe the physical world. Just like natural language can describe feelings (for example); it doesn't govern them though. Also, "free bonus at the end" - do I have to pay for the first part of the video?

My dad would probably do the same thing if he watched Jujutsu Kaisen 🤣🤣

Great video

GAH!!! nice video, but DAMN that flashbang at the end! 12 or so minutes of black followed by what felt like gluing my eyeballs to the sun! anyway you get a sub for quality content, keep it up.

tusk rotate his balls

The set of equations at 2:31 don't make sense: By these two equations, x(t) and v(t) both get extreme values at the same points (derive and equal to zero). So if x(t) is at an extreme point, so is v(t).. In reality, when an object connected to a spring oscillates, when x(t) is in an extreme point, v(t) is zero. Not both of them zero. Now you may claim "but I moved the graph left so zero is an extreme point". Alright, but in that case, what about the other extreme point who is not zero? There you will have x(t) not equal zero, and v(t) should have been zero. but in your equations, v(t) will not be zero over there as well: v(t) will always be proportional with negative sign to x(t). So.. Nope. Replace one of the cos with sin, please 🙂.

Clear and concise. Thanks!

I actually found it quite a bit easier if you outright say “The area/volume is half the total area” I was able to notice that when you first described the second method, but once the final answer was shown, and with the way it was described, I started second guessing myself. (I also didn’t get a good glimpse of the final answer) Since I wasn’t expecting it to be in the terms of a, or if it was going to in terms of side-length or area/volume, the intuitive nature of the maths escaped me! But yeah, the important thing with maths that I’ve noticed is just how often showing one extra step, or one extra simplification, or one extra description of a solution can make people truly *click* with an answer. Of course this was a simple case and a little bit of thinking got me there, but I know for those that especially struggle with maths, this would have helped a bunch! [for the curious: There was a moment I second guessed myself during the explanation, where I thought maybe I’m overlooking an important factor here, and it’ll instead be something like a ratio. Where despite it being 1:1, I needed to account for something like a 1:8. So perhaps I needed some ‘9’ term to account for the ratio - the 1 and the 8. This usually is the issue I usually have with maths, and it’s solved just with thinking about a problem more to double and triple check. I often make ‘silly errors’ because of my adhd and my train of thought moving faster than I can keep up logically. Thought this might be interesting to note for the educator / maths communicator inside of you (I don’t know if that’s what you typically do on KZbin, because this is my first video of yours haha)]

what math is this, is this calc? if it is, I might be cooked. if its linear algebra, I dont think im taking that class for my bsce of civil engineering

as a 14 yr that understands nothing and not from the us, your channel is PEAK🦅🦅🦅

Vertex. Verticee is not a word. The number of people that do this drives me crazy. "Vertex" is the singular. "Vertices" is the plural.

came for the explanation stayed for the megumi slander

So it’s just half the volume of the cube? my intuitive first answer was that it’s just half the volume because the change point between closer to the centre and closer to the vertex is equidistant (half way) between the 2 points, but all the math confuses me. It seems like you don’t need any math at all

Can't wait to take calculus

I'm just curious about how one would write Karma's method proof/reasoning in a rigourous manner so that it would be valid for an exam

This is why undergrad math and physics is a waste of time and is junk. Students should be reading landau and lifshitz instead of that dogshit. Problem solving is overrated as hell. Atleast engineering undergrad has projects.

shit is too complicated to understand how the fuck is math this advanced even real like what the fuck