Пікірлер
@howardskeivys4184
@howardskeivys4184 4 сағат бұрын
Is room acoustics grounded in science based facts, or a mishmash of hypotheses and 2nd and 3rd generation myths? I put it to the test:- My room is 18 feet wide, 21 feet long and 8 feet high. It is P-shaped with an 7 feet wide, 12 feet long and 8 feet high kitchen forming the leg of the P. The flooring is wood clad concrete on a block and bean base. The ceiling is solid concrete with single skin plasterboard walls. 1 long wall is all window from above 3 feet. So, as any acoustician would tell you it’s an acoustic horror story. All that having been said, in my far from ideal, untreated room, the audio reproduction from my premium hi-fi, is superb, as good as I’ve heard, anywhere. The stuff of life that shares space in my room with my hi-fi, rugs, curtains, sofas, cushions, family and pets is undoubtedly partly responsible for taming the room. Nevertheless, with so many KZbin videos ramming the importance of room treatment down my throat, I decided to investigate. I commissioned 3 acousticians from 3 different companies to quote me for room treatment. The quotes varied from 1850€ to 2700€ to 4200€. All 3 acousticians offered very different solutions. But there was some common ground. So I took note of that common ground and using products purchased from Amazon, I did the work myself. Total cost just under 1000€ not including my labour. Then I sat back with my favourite playlist and attentively listened for a considerable length of time. Yes, my room’s ambience was different. But I didn’t consider that altered ambience to represent superior audio reproduction. I experimented with swapping absorption panels for diffusion panels. Distancing bass traps further from the corners, Etc. but I could not create an ambience which I felt improved upon the original audio reproduction of my hi-fi in my untreated room. I guess personal taste is a major factor here. Before you all start barking at me, for using professional acousticians and steeling their ideas, I did pay each of them a consultation fee. So I urge all vulnerable audiophiles not to suffer room anxiety. But if there is anyone out there contemplating taking the same approach as me, I have an attic full of acoustic panels and bass traps you’re welcome to come and collect.
@matthewsykes2906
@matthewsykes2906 14 сағат бұрын
When making an isolation booth for a drummer, for house of worship, would you recommend plexi or glass?
@ohyesitsme
@ohyesitsme 22 сағат бұрын
Yoy need to watch the REL videos
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 20 сағат бұрын
Placing your sub in the corner of any room excites room distortions. Its the old quantity versus quality paradigm. Our goal is to reduce room distortions not create more.
@robcab3725
@robcab3725 Күн бұрын
Asbestos is a red herring , Stay on point and discuss wool
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields Күн бұрын
Mineral wool is not asbestos.
@geickmei
@geickmei Күн бұрын
I have found there are valid reasons for corner traps. The main one is that bass frequencies gather in the corners because they spread from the source more easily and widely and the main speakers are nearest to the front corners. When I put some traps in the two front corners I found the freq response smoothed out for panned images all across the front.
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 20 сағат бұрын
Spend your dollars in treating the cause of all issues which are the walls themselves. If you treat the walls, no corner issues. If you treat the corners, you still have the wall issues.
@el-shaddaidanladi4044
@el-shaddaidanladi4044 2 күн бұрын
do you think making use of rug carpet on part of the walls will handle echoes in a large room like church building?
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields Күн бұрын
Your issue within a church is termed reverberation not echo. Echo is a repeating signal. Reverb is the summation of reflections. With reverb treatment, you must absorb 75% of the frequency range from 125 hz. - 500 hz. Carpet would not have a chance to achieve this treatment goal.
@EggMCMUFFIN-e4l
@EggMCMUFFIN-e4l 3 күн бұрын
Forget the thousands of dollars in gear. Thousands in room treatment can make a mediocre system sound kingly! I spent under $2000 on materials, built my own treatment, and couldn’t be happier!
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 2 күн бұрын
Well said. You can place a 5 K system in an untreated room and it will sound like 5 K. You can place a 5k system in a treated room and it will sound like 50K. Why do people spend thousands on high resolution digital gear and place it in an analog room full of distortions. After 50 years, I am still baffled by this.
@EggMCMUFFIN-e4l
@EggMCMUFFIN-e4l 2 күн бұрын
@ marketing and gimmicks. My system costed me under $1,000 , and I can STILL define resolution and definition more clearly than a $1,000,000 system with no treatment. As I say “people are really spending lots of money for expensive rooms reflections, and end up blaming everything on the gear”
@BenzG1L
@BenzG1L 3 күн бұрын
How about a giant screen TV? If the front baffles of my speakers are 2+ feet in front of the TV surface is that OK?
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 3 күн бұрын
A large, hard, reflective surface between the speakers where the front wall reflections are so critical to definition, separation, and overall image resolution, I think not.
@mrsalamander9246
@mrsalamander9246 4 күн бұрын
If my speakers have a 10 inch driver, is it ok to buy a 10 inch subwoofer, or is it a must to go with 12? What if I went with a smaller subwoofer like 8 inch together with 10 inch speakers?
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 3 күн бұрын
If your speakers have a 10" low frequency driver, why would you want to add another one? With your current two speakers, you have enough output of low frequency energy for most rooms. If you are after more "bass", treat your room correctly. It is your room that is producing your thinking.
@mrsalamander9246
@mrsalamander9246 3 күн бұрын
@@AcousticFields Thanks! They are a 10 inch coaxial speaker with an internal crossover of 80hz. Would it be a mistake to buy a 15 inch subwoofer?
@mrsalamander9246
@mrsalamander9246 4 күн бұрын
What size of subwoofer do you recommend?
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 3 күн бұрын
It depends on the room size, treatment, and its usage. Remember a sub is a pressure producing device.
@AndiPicker
@AndiPicker 6 күн бұрын
Ive asked this question on so many videos and never had a response - how is pulling speakers into the room better than pushing them right against the back wall? I see so many recommendations that put the speakers right in the 3 - 5' zone where the 1/4 wavelength to the back wall is going to reflect to destroy the 50 - 100 Hz region, whereas the speaker against the wall will raise that to a far more treatable 250 - 300 Hz ? Obviously you're going to get a 1/2 space bass boost, but a simple shelving eq will sort that ?
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 5 күн бұрын
Please stop with this positioning nonsense. You can not position yourself out of room modes. You may avoid one, but will enter space that has another. Modes oscillate throughout the room every 36" - 48". You can not play whack a mole with pressure variances. Treat your room, minimize the unwanted pressure, and then you can position anywhere within a pressure balanced room.
@AndiPicker
@AndiPicker 5 күн бұрын
@@AcousticFields 1) That's both ignorant and rude for no reason 2) I'm asking a very specific question about low frequency reflections from the front wall - what part of this is nonsense? What is incorrect about the question?
@imantssafronovs9245
@imantssafronovs9245 6 күн бұрын
Thank you, this hadn’t crossed my mind yet
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 6 күн бұрын
All you have to do is look at the installation processes. Look at the protective clothing and respiration filter requirements. There in lies your answer.
@g.b.5206
@g.b.5206 7 күн бұрын
what do you recommend for minimize noise in a restaurant that have joist and space in between, panels or something in between the joist, is low budget project!!
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 6 күн бұрын
All noise must first be measured over a seven day time period to insure you are measuring the maximum noise levels. Noise management is not a low budget issue.
@Mr-xf4hy
@Mr-xf4hy 7 күн бұрын
Good education
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 6 күн бұрын
We find churches lack acoustical knowledge, are often misled into buying treatment that has no chance of working well in the 125 - 500 Hz. range, and they do not have enough space to treat the reverb issue correctly. Most end up just living with the problem.
@LukasMörk
@LukasMörk 7 күн бұрын
those Eames chairs shure gone popular.
@MuzdokOfficial
@MuzdokOfficial 9 күн бұрын
What is your opinon (neutral unbiased opinion) about Primacoustic Maxtrap?
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 9 күн бұрын
You can compare their rate and level of absorption with ours. There is no comparison. We go lower and get more per square foot. Most of their products are filled with building insulation. This material type is never good for lower frequencies. www.acousticfields.com/about/
@MuzdokOfficial
@MuzdokOfficial 9 күн бұрын
@@AcousticFields yes but that one have a cavity then a menbrane behind. You are right about the fiberglass being not enough for low frequencies
@RocknRollkat
@RocknRollkat 10 күн бұрын
Excellent presentation, thank you ! Bill P.
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 9 күн бұрын
Our pleasure!
@EggMCMUFFIN-e4l
@EggMCMUFFIN-e4l 10 күн бұрын
I put my already tall floor standing speakers on 20” risers and the difference was insane. My equipment rack is only 12” off the floor, and the midrange driver is almost 3’ from the floor, 24” of clearance from equipment to midrange. Key advice
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 9 күн бұрын
Now go a step further and place low frequency absorption inside the stands. When you place your speakers on stands that have our carbon technology inside you immediately improve the low end of your speakers along with mid range resolution. www.acousticfields.com/product/speaker-platform-csp/
@Campbell1.
@Campbell1. 12 күн бұрын
Those Audio Note speakers are very specifically designed to work in corners
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 11 күн бұрын
Lets examine your statement. They are designed "to work in the corners of rooms" where distortions are many. You increase room gain with a corner energy source. Room gain is a form of distortion. Do you want to hear the music or the room. Corner loaded speakers are a marketing effort, not a resolution strategy This is why sub woofer companies locate their subs in corners. They promote sound quantity over sound quality. They know that if you load the corner with energy, you get more energy but less resolution. People will confuse quantity with quality. Keep speakers away from room boundary surfaces. Study the term SBIE. It stands for speaker boundary interference effect which shows you the distortions produced by locating energy sources near the walls.
@Campbell1.
@Campbell1. 11 күн бұрын
@@AcousticFields Thank you Denis
@pouyarezaie101
@pouyarezaie101 12 күн бұрын
Do activated carbon granules' performance degrade over time? Do volatile compounds, and airborne pollutants get trapped in the granules after months/years?
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 11 күн бұрын
Our carbon technology goes inside a cabinet. It is sealed from air movement. We also treat it for moisture retention.
@marijncinjee3403
@marijncinjee3403 12 күн бұрын
all well and good but I do like a bit of sunlight
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 11 күн бұрын
You must make a decision. Do you want sound quality or the brittle and harsh sound created by glass surface areas. It is your choice. On new builds, we locate smaller windows out of the sound fields required for stereo reproduction. We locate them closer to the wall ceiling boundaries.
@EggMCMUFFIN-e4l
@EggMCMUFFIN-e4l 13 күн бұрын
With poorly treated mixing rooms, you end up mixing the music to suite your poorly treated room, NOT to mix the source material. Once I properly treated my room, my mixes were better, quicker, and more natural sounding without sounding thin or boomy. It takes really hearing a shitty room to really understand what a properly treated room can do for audio quality
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 12 күн бұрын
Engineers call us after they have treated their rooms with our technology and they say two things. They say that work flow improves since they are not fighting the room issues in their mixes. Secondly, the quality level of the product they produce improves dramatically.
@EggMCMUFFIN-e4l
@EggMCMUFFIN-e4l 13 күн бұрын
The whole point of your videos is; accurate reproduction of the source material without the room being an addition to the sound. If you want the best, clearest sound possible, PROPER treatment is the only way to go. No audessy will fix a poorly treated room. A proper treated room wil further advanced your listening pleasure over any expensive amp, speaker cable, or any snake oil jargon out there. Room treatment is the best thing for the best sound, even shitty setups can sound like polished turds!
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 12 күн бұрын
Correct. We have two main issues that must be resolved in small rooms. We have both pressure and reflections. Pressure is lower frequency energy below 100 hz. that will not "fit" into the dimensions of the room. Room modal pressures exaggerate and eliminate certain octave bands. Neither of these features contribute to mix resolution. We have middle and high frequency reflections which blur and smear the resolution of those frequencies. The time signature of reflections must be managed correctly using the proper rate and level of absorption to balance the room sound with the speaker sound. What still baffles me after 50 years of working in acoustics is that people take high resolution digital audio and place it in a low resolution analog room and they can't understand why they do not like the sonic quality..
@EggMCMUFFIN-e4l
@EggMCMUFFIN-e4l 13 күн бұрын
I love your straightforwardness in your videos. No bs.
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 12 күн бұрын
We cut through the marketing hype and nonsense for people (most) that do not understand the physics behind room treatment. Companies promote false narratives and they pervert the laws of physics to sell treatment types that under our current laws of physics can never work as they advertise. Most treatments in the marketplace are building insulation based. Building insulation is not an acoustical tool that promotes resolution. It is designed for thermal conductivity not sound absorption. It is a band aid that does not work at lower frequencies and destroys middle and high frequency resolution using the wrong rate and level of absorption. I receive calls every day that people are stating their room is too "dead". When you examine their treatment choices, they are building insulation based. Our products are specifically designed for music and voice. They will not keep your room warm or cool.
@EggMCMUFFIN-e4l
@EggMCMUFFIN-e4l 12 күн бұрын
@ I can attest to this. You fail to get the same resolution with building insulation as you do with proper acoustic foam. Even then, the panels most companies sell are far too thin, doing nothing for the bass frequencies and destroying all the nuances of the mids and highs. They complain that their room is boomy and lacks clarity even though they have their walls laced with egg shells carton panel. I was once that person and once I started developing and properly testing good made room treatment, I laugh at the gimmicks that most companies consider “acoustic treatment”.
@EggMCMUFFIN-e4l
@EggMCMUFFIN-e4l 11 күн бұрын
@ your advice has literally saved me thousands. Even with my “mediocre” setup, the resolution I was able to achieve was unbelievable. I always used to blame my equipment for a lack of clarity but once I treated my room properly and effectively, I was surprised at how good my system actually sounded
@EggMCMUFFIN-e4l
@EggMCMUFFIN-e4l 13 күн бұрын
Your knowledge sir, is fine wine. I’ve followed your tips to a T and the sound from my room is incredible. So good I ended up removing MORE speakers from my room because of how much more projection just my front speakers alone produce. I got rid of my sub and my center channel, with zero loss of resolution, if anything, I gained even more. Plus some speaker mods etc etc. but I’m stunned how little folks pay attention to proper treatment, spending thousands on equipment and still complaining about fidelity…
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 12 күн бұрын
One could make a valid argument that the room is responsible for over 60% of what you hear. That said, few pay any attention to treating the room. It has never made any sense to me. People spend thousands on new gear for a small increase in resolution when that money spent on the room will produce much greater results. I receive many calls from people that are fence sitting on whether to buy a new piece of gear or treat the room. Those that decide to treat the room all most always end up keeping their existing gear. Most comment on hearing all the reasons they originally bought their gear have come back to them with increased room resolution.
@Jeff-mv4yy
@Jeff-mv4yy 13 күн бұрын
Good luck with this. I've owned 5 homes and never had a room where I could get this setup. How about a vid talking about how to correct for asymmetry ?
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 13 күн бұрын
You must correct with treatment to create the room symmetry required for two channel playback resolution.
@mr1enrollment
@mr1enrollment 14 күн бұрын
wow actual info
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 14 күн бұрын
No exaggeration, hyperbole, or half truths here. Just the facts.
@mr1enrollment
@mr1enrollment 14 күн бұрын
I read all these wonderful comments about the information provided by Dennis. But I find that there is little meat to the bones. Dennis simply wants you to call and contract him. From a purely business point of view I get it, but IMHO providing more real examples of various rooms that work instead of showing rooms and setups that don't work would be more useful. I doubt that doing so would reduce his income in anyway - and probably it would increase the trust that people give to his methods. So Dennis please present some meat, stop dancing around giving just enough to make people dependent instead of empowering.
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 14 күн бұрын
What particular "meat" would you be referring to? Please be specific. Showing the mistakes of others is a viable teaching tool since the industry is full of half truths and exaggeration. Its also an industry that keeps repeating the same 60 year old nonsense. Our project pages are full of projects that work well. www.acousticfields.com/projects/
@mr1enrollment
@mr1enrollment 14 күн бұрын
@@AcousticFields I understand and agree that Audio in all its forms is dominated by non sense, voodoo specifications, wrong 'rules', etc. It is good that you address those issues. The meat I personally would like to view would be a series that approaches a common room with the intention of developing a two channel listening room. Start to finish. The analysis, selection of treatments, construction and installation, repetition of the measurements showing the effects of the treatment. Client listening and comments,... You get the idea. A start to finish project, and then another. Eventually covering portions of the possible problems in the rooms. This in opposition to a black board only, narrow topics approach. (?)
@magdalenaodnaglosnienia
@magdalenaodnaglosnienia 15 күн бұрын
So what else should I consider to isolate from the attic? I mean mainly thermo isolation on the attic floor that will be totally non inflamable.
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 15 күн бұрын
We do not get involved with thermo conductivity. We are an acoustic design company. I would suggest you refer to a local HVAC contractor that knows the thermal codes for your area
@magdalenaodnaglosnienia
@magdalenaodnaglosnienia 15 күн бұрын
@@AcousticFields Mineral wool is commonly used for thermal isolation.
@FuzzMartin
@FuzzMartin 16 күн бұрын
Thank you for saving me from buying/building corner bass traps! I appreciate all your content.
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 16 күн бұрын
Spend your time and effort treating at least 50% of the wall surface area. Remember that your room was never designed for audio. You must make it more audio friendly.
@FURognar
@FURognar 17 күн бұрын
I always thought corner bass traps were just for removing excess bass energy from the room, since bass energy likes to collect in the corners. I've never read that they reduced modes. And I would just build my own.
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 16 күн бұрын
The dimensions of the room determine the modal issues that oscillate throughout the room, not just the corners. If resolution is your goal, you must treat the dimensions not the corners. What would you build to treat the modal pressure issues?
@FURognar
@FURognar 16 күн бұрын
@AcousticFields dont have a lot of width as the room is only 12 feet wide, so limited in possibilities. One of them would be to use the back riser as a bass absorber as well.
@interstellarsurfer
@interstellarsurfer 18 күн бұрын
Guy spends 500k for an *"auditory experience"* that can be beat by a pair of basic-ass headphones.
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 18 күн бұрын
Phones "cans" sound and room sound are two completely different sonic experiences. They can not be compared to each other.
@devon-graves-studio-D
@devon-graves-studio-D 18 күн бұрын
The corners are part of it, but shouldn't be ignored. Of course you need to deal with the walls. It is common knowledge that 90 degree corners have a bass-coupling effect. Sure, you are not done with only the corners, but is an excellent starting point. At the end of the video I see the agenda. You want to sell your products.
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 18 күн бұрын
No sales involved. Our goals are resolution and you can not obtain resolution with band aids that are applied to symptoms of the real issues. The dimensions along with the wall structure produces the modal issues that need to be treated. The industry is full of band aids. Those are the companies that want to sell products that people buy that do not understand the real causes of distortions.
@rayms3948
@rayms3948 21 күн бұрын
Is it ok to glue a 5/8” & a 3/8” MDF to make a 1” sheet.
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 19 күн бұрын
Yes, density is the variable to meet. You can use multiple densities to achieve the goal.
@Habitual_Liar
@Habitual_Liar 21 күн бұрын
I have a 15’ x 25’ room. The ceiling is slopped from long wall to long wall. I am currently set up along the long wall to minimize side refections. Thoughts?
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 19 күн бұрын
Yes. Side wall reflections are an image destroyer. Make sure distances from speaker to sidewall are equal.
@Habitual_Liar
@Habitual_Liar 18 күн бұрын
@ unfortunately due to room layout the seating position is 14” off center. I have 3’10 on one speaker to side wall and 5’8” to the other side wall.
@kenned5224
@kenned5224 21 күн бұрын
Where to buy those elevation platforms in Denmark??
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 19 күн бұрын
All of our production units shown in the shop section are manufactured and shipped from the states.
@kenned5224
@kenned5224 21 күн бұрын
how to elevate sub?? Cant find that anywhere? What do i put under my sub???
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 18 күн бұрын
You can elevate, isolate, and attenuate using our sub platform. www.acousticfields.com/product/subwoofer-platform-absorber/
@kenned5224
@kenned5224 21 күн бұрын
So if the sub needs to be in that hight what do we put under the sub then?
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 19 күн бұрын
We make sub platforms that elevate, attenuate, and isolate from the floor. www.acousticfields.com/product/subwoofer-platform-absorber/
@backrack01
@backrack01 21 күн бұрын
What about a high Shed Ceiling?
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 21 күн бұрын
For the highest resolution with most widths and depths we see, a 13' - 15' ceiling height is best.
@oliv9768
@oliv9768 22 күн бұрын
I don’t fancy center / surround / THX / etc-etc anything. I my opinion ; a single pair of ( proper ) horns, a high-quality low watt tube amp, a crescent sofa, in the appropriate room setting will trump [ all ] contenders. In other words : a, non-distorted, audiophile theatre. Y’all can have all that ; “ But wait !!! There’s more !!! ” B.S. 🍺
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 22 күн бұрын
Two channel is dramatically different than multi channel. Both sonic experiences have merit.
@oliv9768
@oliv9768 22 күн бұрын
@ ( and still ) The fact remains that I consider two channel envelopment beyond reproach - under [ any ] circumstance.
@lpopescu07
@lpopescu07 23 күн бұрын
Best channel ever on audio treatments! Bravo!
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 22 күн бұрын
Thank you. We will tell you the truth even though you may not want to hear it.
@pstroke2178
@pstroke2178 23 күн бұрын
I am no expert but fiberglass is also inorganic and requires or should require a respirator. I have installed both and neither is any fun to have in your lungs.
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 22 күн бұрын
Yes. Yes. Yes. Health hazards and poor acoustical performance. Where is the win?
@bobe2933
@bobe2933 25 күн бұрын
it is the year 2025 and I've been waiting for new measurements, relating your products. I still haven't bought any, due to your refusal to do before/after measurements and always giving everybody the run around. Please adapt and I might buy your products. Without measurements, forget it. It is time for frequency response graphs of your products in action, before and after style. I'll give you an example of what lots of people expect to see, before they buy: Pick one size of room that the general population of customers has in their homes and show off your products that way. Example: A measured room with no proprietary foam vs. a room with 70% coverage of foam (list general room volume, RTA, decay times, and Frequency Response, before and after) Feel free to add any other measurements, as per your experience. The more data you give POTENTIAL customers, the better. This style of presentation could go on and on. Another example: A measured, empty room vs. a room filled with 10 ACDA units (list RTA and Frequency response, before and after) Another example: A measured room with no treatment, vs. a measured room with the full house, ACDA's, Foam, and Diffusion. This way, even at a individual level, we can zoom down into the micro of the frequency spectrum and see what effects your products ARE or AREN'T having on the frequency response, amplitude, decay times and what happens at certain levels of product coverage. Please consider doing this and don't give us another run around answer, to what I just wrote. I've been following the channel for years and it is tiresome.. The customers are asking over and over! You talk to some of us like we are dumb. It is off-putting..
@Habitual_Liar
@Habitual_Liar 26 күн бұрын
Do you place these behind the speakers or listening position?
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 25 күн бұрын
In a two channel system, you place them on the front and rear walls. Every room usage is different.
@sonofsandwiches6892
@sonofsandwiches6892 26 күн бұрын
Who the hell listens to their music in a bowling alley ?! Perhaps a simpler video, using a typical small room that is rectangular, would be more helpful?
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 26 күн бұрын
Most of these are examples of what not to do.
@beornthebear.8220
@beornthebear.8220 27 күн бұрын
I want to get 2 subs, and I live on a concrete floor covered with plastic that looks like wood. I imagine front-firing would still add 3dBs to the volume, but I have nowhere else to move them. The room is probably 13'x18'x8' with outlets into the entrance, hallway and kitchen.
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 26 күн бұрын
Elevate them off the floor at least 18". Then try 24".
@AllAccessConstruction
@AllAccessConstruction 27 күн бұрын
I will be calling you when I build ✔️👍🏾💯
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 26 күн бұрын
The design process can take up to 90 days. Make sure you have the proper design before building anything. Mistakes made during the initial construction phase can not be un done with treatment.
@mr1enrollment
@mr1enrollment 27 күн бұрын
Denis: I am 'blessed' with a 7.5ft ceiling. When the time is correct I plan on trying a LF Helmholtz-resonator with two tubes. One tube in the room and one penetrating the ceiling - both tuned to the LF(ROOM CEILING). The idea is a Band Selective passage that sends the LF energy out of the room into the attic area where there is a bunch of insulation and a very large volume. Have you ever tried such an approach?
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 26 күн бұрын
The dip in response with a 7,5' ceiling height will take much more to fix than the Helmholtz can provide. You must go after 30 - 40 Hz, using absorption and then make a physical dimension change along with the treatment of the fundamentals in order to have any impact at 7.5'.
@mr1enrollment
@mr1enrollment 25 күн бұрын
@@AcousticFields A couple of things,... Note: the HR could be above the ceiling. a simple port in the ceiling. There can be multiple units at one or various F0. An insight that I am attempting to understand is: How does the size of the HR port relate to the amplitude control in the room? Thought experiment: The pressure must relate to the Volume of the stroke at the woofer(s). Multiple cycles of a F0 pump energy into the room.. So the port size must be sufficient "drain", (for the lack of a better word), the excess energy from a volume in a time that is short enough to prevent the pressure from building up. Other than 'thinking' about this I have not found any math model for this method. Without just telling me it can't be done - are you aware of any work done that I can read in this area? Note: I am an EE. There is no doubt a electronic model for something like this. Example SpicyTL <-- search for it. In fact SpicyTL may provide the tools to model the idea,....
@mr1enrollment
@mr1enrollment 27 күн бұрын
I do not understand. If the change after adding gain is not proportional across the room, then the system is non linear. What is the non-linearity ?? I believe superposition should apply. Correct me if this is an error. Perhaps the absorber is saturating some how? But I doubt that.
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 27 күн бұрын
Room dimensions produce modal pressures throughout the room. The goal is to have the room as pressure "neutral" as possible to minimize peaks and dips in performance.
@mr1enrollment
@mr1enrollment 27 күн бұрын
@@AcousticFields I understand that. However you said that a treated room may become less neutral when the volume is turned up. At least that is what I heard.
@michaelhahn9239
@michaelhahn9239 28 күн бұрын
Rock wool is heavier than air. You should wear a respiratory when cutting and installing is just like with any insulation, but all particals will drop to the floor. Fiberglass insulation fibers will floar in the air. I believe rock wool is one of the best and safest insulation in the market today
@AcousticFields
@AcousticFields 27 күн бұрын
Why use a product that has health risks along with poor acoustical performance? Where is the win?
@michaelhahn9239
@michaelhahn9239 27 күн бұрын
@AcousticFields 5he only danger is the partials are small enough that if they get into your lungs then your lungs have a difficult time expelling them just like dust. Rock wool is very fine partials of rock. As for acoustic value I'm sure there is a better product. For insulation value Rock wool is very good. Rock wool is safer and b3ter product than fiberglass insulation.