5 ай бұрын
5 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@tremdoctor007 17 сағат бұрын
My home guitar studio is small, 8’ high x 12’ long x 8’ wide. So far I’ve got 3 2’ x 6’ 2” thick foam panels glued to plywood hanging 1’ off the floor. Behind the amps/cabs will be up to 3 2’ x 6’ foam panels, and the entry walls and door. I have carpet on the floor. Sounds great, no real echo anymore so I get good room mic’ing and can mic’ing (of course) my 12’ x 8’ wall has 46% coverage. I can move the panels if I need more but I doubt it as recommended is 15% to 30% coverage
@deehive 2 күн бұрын
I accidentally raised my sub by putting it temporarily on another sub enclosure and the difference is night and day. Thus i rushed to YT to search on raising subs from the floor . I know i have viewed this video before but did not put attention . Thanks for sharing . You the man. 🎉
@AcousticFields Күн бұрын
Raising or moving any low frequency producing source away from a room boundary surface will improve room response.
@BluesMan1234 2 күн бұрын
Just came across this video while in the process of deciding how I want to design my basement studio, great video, a lot of good points to think about. Thank you!
@AcousticFields Күн бұрын
We are all about room resolution with 70%, 80%, and 90% resolution rooms offered to match any chosen usage.
@1rallow 3 күн бұрын
You are absolutely a waste of time you just selling some shit get off the Internet
@Xtn1Insecticide 4 күн бұрын
Bass in corner projects more yes, but the back wave is close enough to the wall to hide it better, where as a sub further out in the room will actually get more reflections at different delay/ distance times. This is why recordests often put drums in a corner because it’s than easier to deal with the reflections hitting other microphones because you’re sorting the backwave early. In essence your running your sub lower and instead of trying to get rid of the corner buildup, you’re utilising it to get your correct level back. Also if your sub is. Right up against the corner, the distance from the front of the speaker and wall is close, if your speaker is say 1 ft long, then the backwave is only 3 milliseconds late to your ear and in general the human brain can’t separate 3 milliseconds so it merges with the front wave as a single source. Also, the harder you drive a sub, the more mass you are pushing further and the harder it is for the magnet and coil to compensate moving and returning that mass precisely so what you lose using the room is compensated by more clarity from the loud speaker itself.
@AcousticFields 4 күн бұрын
Recording processes are different than listening paradigms. When listening, you never place an energy source in a corner of anything. This act brings in 3 - 6 dB of room sound which what we are resolution fighting.
@Xtn1Insecticide 4 күн бұрын
@ the thing is even if you’re not in a corner, the speaker is still creating reflections and bass buildup dependent on the size of the room. Considering that low end is generally mono, for cutting/ mastering purposes, a single sub in the middle is logical, however then you might get a doubling of reflection effect at certain frequencies and in some cases a cancel effect depending on the length of the wave bouncing off the walls to the central listener so in this case an off centre sub would be better. However sound will still build up in the corners, it’s unavoidable so putting the sub there at lower db decreases the reflection intensity in general in the room because it’s using the wall reflection. This allows you to run two subs, one in each corner lower and also halved because you have two! and then instead of having to try to get rid of the corner buildup, you’re utilising it to get your level back. Running subs lower means the excursion is lessoned and this means getting that mass to move and return per wave is more efficient and therefore more detailed and clear. So what you lose from the wall reflection you make up with clearer direct signal because you’re also lowering the mass/ velocity/ return effect of the driver.
@a.s.2426 5 күн бұрын
I’ve watched a few videos and I’m unclear on something: To what end do all the best practices you suggest aim? What is the ultimate system KPI you use? A lot of seems to point very simply to flat frequency response (or as flat as possible within budget and space limitations). Or perhaps I’m misunderstanding?
@AcousticFields 4 күн бұрын
The goal is resolution of as many pressure and reflection issues budget and space will allow for. We offer 3 resolutions 70, 80, and 90%. The first level of 70 is for hobbyists. The 80% level is professional mix and the 90% is mastering level resolution. The goal is a balanced frequency response to match the room usage.
@a.s.2426 4 күн бұрын
@@AcousticFields Got it. Yes, I did hear you say that in a video. Could this be understood to mean, in other words, that a theoretical 100% would be synonymous with a perfectly flat frequency response?
@The_Ballo 5 күн бұрын
I bet laminate glass or thick aquarium glass would be less tinny.
@AcousticFields 5 күн бұрын
There would be less movement. However, it still is a horrible surface for reflected energy. Glass is like drywall. It has a negative impact from 800 - 2000 hz.
@utubecomment21 8 күн бұрын
*Just to correct you;* Acoustics hasn't changed for millions, if not billions of years. Our understanding of acoustics may have changed, and certainly our approach to designing audio equipment has changed, but acoustics have remained and will remain a constant!
@AcousticFields 7 күн бұрын
Electronics have progressed. Unfortunately, people are still stuffing boxes and walls with building insulation and calling it a "bass trap".
@efeplevneli9063 8 күн бұрын
Thank you man really thank you🙏🙏
@AcousticFields 7 күн бұрын
You are welcome.
@tommy-6597 10 күн бұрын
Just watched another one your videos where you say that all the room modes and nasty stuff ends up in the corners. So surely absorption or trapping there cant be a bad thing. On the journey to the best you can do, 5-10% improvement seems worthwhile
@AcousticFields 9 күн бұрын
The percentage of improvement will depend on room dimensions. Our goal is resolution. With that goal in mind, there can be no place for tactics that don't address the main issues. Resolution is never about band aids.
@curtvincent3728 11 күн бұрын
Oh! This is SOOO refreshing to hear! I am an electrical engineer, NOT an acoustic engineer but I read a lot about acoustics while building several studios for my own use. I am an old guy; I don't remember when corner bass traps first appeared, but they were NOT in many of the studios I have worked in or visited. Motown, Sun Studio and many I visited in NYC, Philly and Nashville do NOT have corner bass traps. That tells you something. I like what this gentleman says: "We can't trap bass, we can only manage it." Volume, material and design. Amen.
@AcousticFields 11 күн бұрын
The industry is full of band aids and tactics as such that do nothing to improve overall room resolutions. It is the room dimensions and only the room di9mensions that determine what energy the room will "like" and what energy it will not. You keep what the room likes and your treat the energy the room does not like. This is not rocket science. The real misunderstanding comes in the application of treatments. People can't see through the hyperbole, exaggeration, and half truths the industry spits out that masks the real acoustic truths that involve rate and level of absorption.
@michaelhutchinson4293 14 күн бұрын
I have professionally installed rel 6 packs and I was originally pessimistic about the idea. But hearing is believing, it’s incredible sound and is in perfect phase with the main speakers. Don’t fall for contempt prior to investigation, go and listen for yourself.
@AcousticFields 13 күн бұрын
Send us a response curve of your room with 6 subwoofers. Lets see the response curve with all that energy. The money you spent focusing on low frequency management using more energy could have treated all frequency issues within your room. You could have a smooth response curve for all frequencies not just the claimed lower ones.
@andrewray3625 15 күн бұрын
Not speakers it room not everyone got perfect room
@AcousticFields 14 күн бұрын
True. However, you can take a room that was never designed for audio and treat the issues and make it audio friendly..
@faisalkathirfasa 16 күн бұрын
Grand Pocket Master
@AcousticFields 14 күн бұрын
Definitely. One of the best.
@OverflowMusicStudio 16 күн бұрын
I have two questions? What building insulation or foam you bought worked as advertised you mentioned was 10 to 15 percent and also when you say horsepower you mean db attenuation only? Or? Amazing video by the way!
@AcousticFields 13 күн бұрын
Thank you. The internal fill material must do two things. It must manage the energy inside the diaphragmatic absorber and manage it well enough to improve the units overall performance. Building insulation lacks the horsepower or proper rate of absorption per square foot to maximize both internal and external parameters,
@monolabmusicstudio2373 16 күн бұрын
Years ago ASC published a paper on placement of their tube traps. Over a decade of installations revealed that the bass build up was better handled if you put the trap in the middle of the wall(walls and ceiling). I had my room trapped thinking bass was building up in the corners, so I simply moved the existing traps to new positions based on the ASC paper and my room immediately sounded better.
@AcousticFields 13 күн бұрын
Its never the corners. It is always the dimensions and the walls that create those dimensions. The acoustical products industry is full of half truths and band aids. This is another example of which foam manages low frequency energy is my favorite one.
@Derricky007 17 күн бұрын
All you said is right. Many people will not pay attention to the content of the whole video. Of course, treating only corners is nonsense. You need to take care of your complete surface of the walls first. Bass traps although help. But alone bass traps without proper wall treatment is nothing. This is the talk that platforms and sellers market and promote. Most people expect to spend as little as possible, and expecting incredible results. And at the end of the day everyone will learn it at least by own experience. Acoustic treatment is a science, and it costs a lot to do it properly. Cheap solutions, if we can call them cheap, lets say 500-1000 US$ can make an awful room sound decent or even good. But if you go the pro way, then thousands of Dollars have to be spent. The foam thickness, form..... everything plays a role. For the most part, you get what you pay for.
@AcousticFields 17 күн бұрын
Well said. You are correct. In over 50 years of working in sound management, we find that 90% of people use a single tactic without an overall sonic strategy. They place this product here or there without consideration of the macro view for the room acoustic. Everything in acoustics is related to everything else. You may impact one area with a tactic and create more issues with others . Room distortions are like one large extended family. You must look at the complete room first and foremost. This is the impetus behind our mission statement of starting with low frequency management in any design. Low frequency wave energy defines and provides the foundation that all music "rides" upon. You must get the low end (foundation) correct before you work on anything else. The lower frequency fundamentals are directly related to mid and high frequency harmonics. Small rooms are like small towns. Everyone knows everyone else and all the issues that go along with that paradigm.
@Derricky007 17 күн бұрын
@AcousticFields Even curtains, closets, or different things can affect reflections. The biggest issue is an empty room with flat walls. This is the best example for untreated scenarios. The size of the room, height floor to ceiling also plays a role. Even a carpet impacts/diffuses the echoing. Even small vocal booths which are literally small are also bad for recordings. Prople tend to think that building a closet size like vocal booth is cheap and a pro solution. False, even though it is acoustically treated, it diffuses the sound of the spoken vocals into the mic. The size in this case is also important. A good example in a smaller environment is the car industry. Why would a manufacturer hire engineers to develop high end audio systems in a such small cabinet ? Exactly, to deliver fidelity and authenticity. Every cm\inch has to ne measured in order to calculate speaker placement and to add acoustic elements integrated into different parts of the car to achieve the task.
@RatedCfm-cz8ff 18 күн бұрын
I used cellulose in acoustic panels I built, It was more work, but it was definitely worth not having irritating, airborne glass/mineral fiber everywhere in my studio area..
@AcousticFields 17 күн бұрын
Agreed. Building insulation has health warnings along with poor acoustical performance. I do not see a win here except cost. Do you take cost over health and performance. Most do.
@ReginaBodnar 19 күн бұрын
So how much did all this cost?
@AcousticFields 18 күн бұрын
Rooms are priced based upon the resolution the client desires. We offer three resolution programs. We have 70, 80, and 90% resolutions. In this room, we were able to achieve a 82% resolution at a cost of around 25 K.
@tdcurrie3579 19 күн бұрын
While browsing KZbin looking for ideas to correct the room acoustics in my 2 channel listening area I came across this video. Lots of good ideas to help me get the best sound from my speakers when not using my headphones. Wish I had the woodworking skill of John to be able to construct those baffles. And to top it off, I find out that I'm related to him.
@AcousticFields 18 күн бұрын
When dealing with room acoustical issues, think pressure and reflections.
@RigVader 19 күн бұрын
My mammy told me the qrd diffusers also absorb and increase the absorption of existing panels in the room. True story
@AcousticFields 18 күн бұрын
Not true. Diffusion offers no sound absorption qualities. Diffusion increases reverb times. This is why it is a priority to have reverb times balanced throughout the room using absorption before introducing diffusion. Diffusion can make your room sound worse if reverb times are not balanced throughout the room.
@RigVader 18 күн бұрын
@@AcousticFields This is in direct opposition to what I’ve every other acoustician say, but since I don’t have I the background, I guess I’ll just have to do my own testing/measurements 🔈🎤
@54Forrester 22 күн бұрын
When it comes to the IRS V, best not to criticize what you do not understand. The wings have a purpose and the line source has a purpose and they are designed to be as close to floor-ceiling as possible. kzbin.info/www/bejne/qXzcZqihpd5gj68
@AcousticFields 21 күн бұрын
They may be designed that way but what you don't understand is the distortions that design produces with its interaction with the room. Anytime you place a speaker close to a room boundary surface you produce distortions. There is a name for those distortions (SBIE) I know, now you will tell me that the speaker designer has eliminated those distortions with the design. Now, who is not understanding physics.
@byronb. 24 күн бұрын
My glass experience. I had to use a (rectangular) living room. Very common in the states. HiFi music and 5.2 home theater. Great flat rear wall. Four rounded corners to the ceiling. 8' ceilings. Not flat. Decorative recessed area. 3/4 left wall with entry door and opening to the dining room. Right wall had a brick fireplace flanked by two windows high enough to be just above the speakers. Front wall had a HUGE window with a decorative rounded top. At least 6' tall. Had six 4' tall 4" thick moveable acoustic adsorption panels with optional feet. Treated first reflections. Little audible improvement. 🤔 Covered fireplaced and used two smaller absorption panels that perfectly fit the windows. Little audible improvement. Blocked entry to living room with one and two adsorption panels. Little audible improvement. Removed glass coffee table. Little audible improvement. 🤔 Placed absorption panel in front of TV. Little audible improvement. Placed adsorption panels behind the listening position and on the rear wall. Little audible improvement. Placed an adsorption panel on front window and closed the 2" wood blinds for decor. That's the window located behind the TV and (LCR front) speakers. Whoa!!! 😮HUGE audible improvement! Center Channel speaker became focused and clear. Dialogue more audible and louder. The whole room seemed to sound better. Placed a second panel next to it to completely cover the width of the window and left them there permanently with the wood blinds closed so you didn't see them. During movies or critical music listening, I would remove the remaining panels from storage & place two at the first reflections and two at the opening to the living room. Much better sounding room now.
@AcousticFields 23 күн бұрын
Treating both pressure and reflections produces the best results. This is an example of reflection management.
@MrRonnmaui 25 күн бұрын
Always interesting. What about "open" rooms where the speakers and sub sit in a smaller room with (3) sides but pointed into a kitchen and a long hallways and then into a room with open beam ceilings? The sub/sound waves should be pointed towards the longest space correct?
@AcousticFields 24 күн бұрын
Sound waves are low frequency energy. They are omni directional. You do not point them. Ray energy covers middle and high frequencies. This energy is directional. Open spaces should always be behind the listening position.
@duanerandleman2456 26 күн бұрын
Con man
@morasa3000 26 күн бұрын
@acousticfields hello. Do you have a video explaining how I can stop or at least lower the noise to my neighbor's side house ? I have an small 9 x 9 feet room where I practice drumming., any video or tutorial ? My walls are made of solid bricks. Thanks !!
@AcousticFields 25 күн бұрын
All noise must first be measured over a seven day time period so you can determine the lowest frequency and the greatest amplitude or strength of that frequency. Once you have determined the frequency and amplitude of the noise, you can then design the appropriate barrier.
@moneyzonetrader Ай бұрын
Sir i have normal bedroom 12.7x10.7x10 but i bought pb 2000 pro. Having null in 70 to 80hz zone huge spl drop. What acoustic do u suggest
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
Nulls are produced by a dimension that does not work well with the other two. Most of the time you work with the fundamental frequency which would be 35 hz. and apply absorption to reduce the peak you have at 35 hz. Our ACDA unit is designed for that issue. www.acousticfields.com/product/acda-10-studio/
@JalanBangsar Ай бұрын
If I put the speakers far from the glass, for instance, I make the glass the rear wall, which is the furthest wall from the speaker. But isn't this worse? To my knowledge, the rear glass wall would cause even more problems.
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
All glass must be covered during usage for any critical listening.
@redgateguitars Ай бұрын
How do you deal with a double glass recording studio window behind the desk between the speakers?
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
You must cover it during usage to avoid the slap back reflection from the glass at the mix position. Our foam technology will work well for middle and high frequency reflections.
@redgateguitars Ай бұрын
@@AcousticFields Thanks, makes good sense.. So many studios with glass control windows!
@jjpopnfresh6822 Ай бұрын
2:41 At least they got the cables lifted off the floor 😂
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
Hardly a major point when it comes to all the room distortions with pressure and reflections.
@CanadianPonchman Ай бұрын
Wow. This is such an educational string of videos. I wish i found this before
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
Think only two things when it comes to your room acoustic. Think pressure and reflections. Low frequency issues are pressure based and middle and high frequency issues are reflection based.
@Treyk901 Ай бұрын
REL begs to differ thanks to better crossovers.
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
Better crossovers will have minimal impact on the modal pressure issues within a room. The room dimensions determine the low frequency issues. Placing less energy at certain frequencies will have an impact but only at those frequencies. Its best to treat the room for all low frequency issues and then you don't have to play cat and mouse with room modes. You can treat the complete room for all frequency issues for the costs of two subs.
@jasonmeanshealer Ай бұрын
Where can a beginner start in order to learn from you
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
Our videos are designed to educate.
@jasonmeanshealer Ай бұрын
@ I understand and I appreciate your content. However some of it seems as if I’m in the deeper end of the pool. Would you recommend I start elsewhere
@VDJ4500 Ай бұрын
Hi, thank you for sharing! An amazing well of an information! Do you guys use fiberglass core for treatment restaurant spaces as well? I’d appreciate any input, i’m reading it’s safe but i’m so scared using it ( construction bacground).. 😅.
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
Building insulation was never designed as an acoustical tool. It has poor performance, destroys harmonics, and is full of health issues.
@keithmoriyama5421 Ай бұрын
Every Audiophile says "It's about the Music." 🙄
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
Its more like 50% music, 50% gear and no room treatment. People will take high resolution gear and place it in low resolution rooms. With this paradigm, they are only hearing about 50% of what their gear can produce.
@dispersemedia Ай бұрын
Acoustic perfection takes away the character of drum recordings.
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
Nonsense. Room resolution aids in hearing the fundamentals along with all harmonic orders of all instruments.
@dispersemedia Ай бұрын
Some Jazz clubs are even smaller than that room.
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
Room resolution is a balancing act between many variables. The size and volume of the room, the reverb times within the room, the amount of energy placed within the room to name just a few. Room volume is only one variable.
@vinceforcier5114 Ай бұрын
My experience: as you move towards the corner the bass is accentuated. If you do not have mics (tracking) or listeners (mixing room) near the corners, corner traps might not help you much. I was building mixing rooms for TV and film, usually just a mixer and one client. Traps did not usually matter, but when the client brought the production team in for review and the rear couch and chairs (nearer the corners) were filled and people were standing all around the room. The corner traps helped to level the bass across a larger area. It basically expanded the usable area for effective listening. This is why I never applied corner traps on the screen wall. No one stands back there. If you want to be able to use your entire space and not have the effect of bass concentration in the corners, corner traps can be quite effective. I am building a home studio room. I will be the only one in there, and will rarely be near a corner. I am not intending to install corner traps.
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
If the ultimate resolution is desired in your room, you must treat the sources of all issues. If you treat the walls which are the source of the corner issues, you treat the cause and not the symptom. This industry is full of band aids that the uniformed fall for.
@JP5466 Ай бұрын
They're pretty much the same below 125hz.
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
Agreed. However, the damage drywall does from 800 - 2,000 Hz. is unacceptable for middle range harmonics.
@_hide_-lb1gk Ай бұрын
So in my 10x10 room, turn it into a 6.5x6.5 room by putting 3' of treatment plus gap? 🤣 Cool, thats practical.
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
Nothing is practical about small rooms. Low frequency management takes space. Its physics.
@segundacuenta726 Ай бұрын
Very interesting. However that amount of weight would be too much for an apartment in a building. As well as the space required. This seems targeted at studios and commercial settings with high requirements and space available (as well as cost). What are your thoughts on steel and lead? Cheers
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
We use steel many times for noise transmission issues. Lead is toxic.
@segundacuenta726 Ай бұрын
@@AcousticFields My understanding was that lead is toxic to handle bare handed and if there is air exposing or connecting to where one breathes. If it is sandwiched and well sealed no amount of off gas or the like would reach the interior or the exterior for that matter. Also I think being more dense and softer than steel it's better for low frequencies. But the cost is higher for the same mass like 3 or 4 times as much. I would think it is much easier to handle and work with than steel (for cutting, moving, soldering etc.) specially if thinking of 1/4 to 1/2 inch steel as opposed to thinner sheets. Anyway, everything has a price as far as pros and cons. Steel and lead allow for less space but are more expensive than regular materials. Nice thing is steel is bulletproof.
@compucorder64 Ай бұрын
I do think you are totally right that overall a much better approach is to build your own panels to treat all the walls AND ceiling. Build your own diffusors. And cloud. A DiY approach, where the cost is the materials, and the goal is maximum treatment is much better than _buying_ some premade 'corner traps'. The only advantage I see of favouring corners, if you really are going to only treat 10% of a room, is that often times corners can be wasted space in a studio. Which I guess is one of the reasons the area behind the monitors often gets treated expensively, and also sometimes the back wall behind the listening position (also for reflections too). I wouldn't want to put a guitar cab, bass cab, speakers, mic area or listening position right in a corner. So it's not the worst place in a room to lose room to treatment. Also, maybe, just maybe, it can also be easier to naturally have an air gap, behind say an 8" panel, if it's placed across a corner, the prism shaped air gap would be somewhat marginally beneficial to absorption? But you are the expert, so I wonder if that is true, or not?
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
Air gaps are of minimal benefit. Our goal is resolution and most people are about putting band aids on issues that do not contribute to resolution. Resolution is a step by step process that starts with lower frequency management first and foremost.
@reyzuna Ай бұрын
but it is not even necessary to put them high above the ceiling together with twitters and mids. Some Large Sound systems are now hanging them up above where a Sub has no Directional Throw and it is useless because the Mass of Air up are not that thick, They are light so the vibration will be weak and it makes no sense having a subwoofer because it will sound like just a mid up there. Subs are meant to be on the ground but if you have wooden flatform on a second floor, or if you have carpeted floor, then that's the time you raise them up a Casters Hight.
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
Nonsense. A subwoofer is a pressure producing device. Pressure waves are not directional.
@VM-oi3dk Ай бұрын
I hear a lot reverb, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing, for singing anyway
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
One can calculate overall room reverb from an iphone mic
@Cowplunk Ай бұрын
I wonder why no one makes acoustic panels with suction cups on them to attach to windows.
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
People do not want to cover their windows. Most will live with "glass sound".
@johnkreutz3207 Ай бұрын
What about magnepan speakers
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
Remember that the room only sees energy. The source of that energy does not matter to the room. In our experience these speaker types benefit from diffusion after reverb decay times are managed correctly.
@rodequis6014 Ай бұрын
Nice vid, interesting Acoustic Fields beginning. Hey, it's octuber 2024, there's no new videos on this channel anymore?
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
We are going to make changes to video program in 2025. Stay tuned.
@rodequis6014 Ай бұрын
@AcousticFields oh, good to know!. In the meantime, i'll keep watching some old videos. Nice channel, i have learned a lot from u guys. 👍.
@woowooNeedsFaith Ай бұрын
I was hoping to hear something about physics of sound waves, but no. Just endless obfuscation and marketing BS.
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
Instead of complaining about something you do not see, why not ask for it?
@woowooNeedsFaith Ай бұрын
@@AcousticFields Thank you for reply. I wasn't expecting one, especially for a 10 year old video. *Instead of complaining about something you do not see, why not ask for it?* Because it gave me strong impression that your background does not include formal education in physics. It would be waste of time asking physics question(s) about topic for which I think I already have better answers you can provide. I simply wanted to see if you have something to add to it. But no, there was not even clear and concise description of what's the idea behind the quarter wavelength rule and what it is (actually) good for. My problem with this is that your motive is not to teach physics of acoustics, but to sell a solution to a problem which I don't have. I need better information source than this channel to get some answers to questions I'm pondering... Meanwhile, I think I finally might have found one. I simply don't want even to try to be the genius developing theories of acoustics from fundamentals of physics. People smarter than me have surely already done it.
@hawkmoon369 Ай бұрын
Yes I agree the room is the most important component with sound reproduction.
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
We believe that the room contributes more than 50% to what you hear.
@johnkreutz3207 Ай бұрын
What can you do if you can't build a custom room but have an average room ceiling height and yes glass
@AcousticFields Ай бұрын
You must cover the glass and manage all pressure and reverb issues.