Hex gives fun, but stern, mom energy and I'm here for it.

Women and minorities? In MY video games? GRRR /s

Playing game is fun casual or not even is sweaty 🤣🤣🤣🤣 , They are just a lot people want to be the best but they don't play for fun 😤😤

Bro sense the first i saw her. i hate her so much. I feel llike she so weird

i was introduce to video games by a the military husband of my aunt. After 15 years of marriage, he got divorce because he turn out to be gay and did not want to lie to himself.

my peak pefpormance was back in 2015 i havent been as good since then mainly because of me dislocating my wrist ad it never healing properly but i still have my fun

I don't see how any game dev could prevent people from dumping thousands of hours of their life into a game and getting better. Unless a game dev could limit players' time, I don't see a way for sweaty gamers to be stopped. But even if players HAD limited time per day on Valorant, say, for the limit to be meaningful players would ALSO have to be limited on similar games, like CS:GO. Which doesn't seem realistic. And unfortunately, when people argue that sweats ruin games I hear something more like, "I wish winning was easier (for me)."

You are so real!!!!! She is so crazy for doing this...kenji is so nice to people and she does this. SHE IS A ADULT!!!!

The problem and something that is a lot of these anti woke people are more concerned that they "woke" gamed *work* or are successful. A lot of these "woke" games arent even bad because of the "woke" idealogies, but because there are usually a ton of bugs and issues. Cyberpunk they preached it was bad because it was "woke" but it a as bad for shitty management and the severe bugs. The game after changes and fixed is great now, but it literally has all the hard woke themes. But they don't say anything because it's good now and they just avoid playing it and they can't ride on the hate of it due to development issues.

It's because competive activities are sustained by external industries and aren't sustained by players directly. Look at real sports; Sure, they are sustainable, but how many people participate in the ACTUAL sports. Not nearly as many people play sport but they are sustained by sponsors or sometimes government intervention that and ticket sales. Specific video games don't really have the same level of investment, some do but they are the long standing incumbents like your Starcraft, LOL, ect. Sports have lot more long standing institutions and seldom change. This stabilises it market, but new video games are made almost yearly and rely on direct participation for their economy.

I've always had this thing with competitive games or any game where you match with randoms tbh, where I don't wanna play because I'm afraid I'm gonna underperform and affect other's people fun, even tho I'm usually better than your average 2 iq LoL player for example. But idc about my team playing bad, even when they troll on purpose I'm like, aight I guess lmao.

I thought people's thoughts would be more on why Mr. Beast is doing this after the failure of "Feastibles" (as well as "PRIME" revealed to be an unhealthy drink)

I as a pokemon fan from the start (red/blue/yellow) I agree that the games have been hot garbage for a good number of years now. I have only persised due to being a casual shinyhunter but Im stopping for other better made games soon. sorry about haters, they exist everywhere. you do what you enjoy and if they hate they lose out.

I don't think hex realizes how much overlap there is with gacha and league/tft. It's a good amount of ppl

Body shot bandit??? 😂😂 that one caught me off guard.

Aim assist is the solution to sweaty players It is hard to balance skill my solution would be to mitigate it by getting rid of the skill

Wokeness is when it's pandering in an obvious way. IE. a game can have a gay character but when the character's entire premise is about that and nothing else, it's pandering as they have no character depth (unless it's a random ass NPC which obviously doesn't matter for the game). Spiderman 2 PS5 for example, 90% of the sidequests (not talking about the drones etc missions) are either helping a minority or a disabled person and also some BLM propaganda here and there. Game wise; Miles is purposely stronger than Peter only equal whenever Peter has the Venom/Anti-Venom suit (even then, Miles has more value due to constant power refreshes, faster recharges, more AoE). I think both extremes are bad tbf, black characters existing is not woke as I've seen some say. Even if SM3 mainly focuses on Miles and is even more woke, I like the gameplay in of itself. Not playing a good game simply because it's woke or pushes a narrative is just falling into a never ending abyss until you don't enjoy anything and hate everything. Form your own opinion and enjoy life. Finally a message I like to point out in these types of debates especially with censorship: This battle is a "Lose-Lose" situation. You buy it thus enabling more censorship to come in the future or you don't thus eventually killing off the series. I believe every ship can be steered back to course, so I do eventually buy it cause I want it to live..

When players take gaming too seriously, often referred to as "sweaty gamers," it can have a negative impact not only on other players but also on their own mental well-being. Research suggests that hyper-competitive gaming can contribute to increased stress, frustration, and even burnout. This relentless drive to win or perform at a high level can lead to unhealthy gaming habits, where players become fixated on mechanics or achievements, ultimately draining the fun and joy that games are meant to provide . For example, in games like Fortnite, players who perfect high-level techniques, such as building 90's, create an overwhelming skill gap that alienates newer or casual players. Instead of fostering an inclusive environment, these hyper-competitive behaviors can deter newcomers, causing them to feel frustrated and disconnected, leading to higher dropout rates. Studies on player retention have shown that steep learning curves and overly competitive environments can discourage engagement and participation, especially for new players who feel they have little chance of success . On the flip side, players who are either new or less skilled can also unintentionally harm the gaming experience for others. Whether they are inexperienced or intentionally throwing games, they create a different kind of frustration. In team-based games, where cooperation is key, having a player who doesn't understand the mechanics or doesn't contribute effectively can lead to dissatisfaction among teammates. In some cases, the presence of underperforming players can feel as disruptive as facing overly competitive ones. In summary, both hyper-competitive and underperforming players can negatively affect the gaming experience. "Sweaty gamers" who take games too seriously may unintentionally alienate others, increasing stress and frustration while diminishing the fun that games are meant to offer. Their intense focus on winning creates skill gaps that discourage newcomers from engaging. On the other hand, less skilled or intentionally disruptive players can also cause frustration by undermining team dynamics and cooperation. Ultimately, balance is essential in creating an enjoyable gaming environment where players of all skill levels can participate without feeling overwhelmed or discouraged.

The problem with these new "LiVe SeRvIcE" games is that the minimum amount of effort is being put into something that's obviously trying to be a cash grab because somebody in a board room meeting was told "You know what The Youngs are into these days? Hero based shooters!" and then Concord sharted itself all over our collective consciousness. There are a limited number of humans on the planet, and there is a limited number of minutes in the day, and not every game CAN be everyone's "Forever Game" that the suits want it to be. Competitive games are just the lowest hanging fruit because it's the easiest playerbase to abuse psychologically, next to gacha gamers :) Every time a live service game flops, the industry becomes a better place. We need more "We're just going to make a great game, sell the great game, and when we're done, we'll make another one!" instead of "How do we create an indefinite source of income that takes virtually no effort to create or maintain so we can fire off 2/3rds of the developers when it's done and use that to float the next one ad infinitum?"

Woke games usually have things done that make little to no impact on the game and feels a lot like “we checked the box”. Things like “strong independent woman that doesn’t need a man” or “their personality is that they are gay” typically when it’s directly thrown in your face as well and emphasized like it’s a big point. Another thing would be stuff like ragging on capitalism just to rag on it, not from a point of it being relevant to the game. Like a random npc calling somebody a capitalist pig when it’s not relevant to the story of the game.

"UPPER ECHELON" Lmfao 😆 these players are in an illusion of Improving or getting Faster since they are getting it mixed up with just Getting Consistent out of Repitition of the same angle and Maps, but sure there are Positive aspects being Improved like being a Better Teammate and having the Drive and Persistence to Win. Also when I say "illusion" that does not mean it's a bad thing coz Some people can make those illusions Reality. Anyone can be at that Upper Echelon of any Game if they are Willing to sacrifice Thousands of Hours in it and when they do They are still going to Get Tested at that Peak Level if they are Truly Worthy.

I have a very simple mind set and it goes like this: I already have a hard time being a loser in real life, so why the hell would I want to be a loser in a video game? I play games to escape real life and have fun.

When the results are win or lose the game will be competitive. It’s more about finding the fun in a competitive game.

Damn, I only found kenji back in March, makes me so sad to hear that happened to him😭

It's a weird symbiosis. Tryhards in comp and pro play need the casuals to sustain the game itself. The casuals are in turn motivated and inspired by the pros and tryhards. Like even the memelords of overwatch like Frogger and Vulture are tryhards in their own way, they're just not toxic. Both sides need each other.

im soo bad at souls like gams but i keep coming back

Hi twitch chat!

When it comes to competitive games, either play with friends who know the game, play with players who know how to play, or with players that don't know to play. 63.4% of my outcome is with players who don't know the game or make the team lose. That's why I started playing HSR and still keep playing Dokkan because it requires strategy team building. I came back to Brawl Stars, even though I'm not still used to the new system the game has, but I still have fun when playing again with my cousin.

Gay people are fine but these "acknowledgments that they exist" are misplaced. I don't need to be reminded that gay people exist while I'm running from pyramid head in dbd or something. I prefer they be acknowledged passively by being in game characters rather than having symbols everywhere. If you're gonna have symbols of one type of person then you need to have them for multiple types

Honestly I'm surprised they didn't have the Fable series in the list that game you can be gay ASF in them XD

People who enjoy extreme competition in games often find satisfaction in more than just the goal of going professional. The drive to improve their own skills and measure that improvement against others is key. It's about pushing personal limits, achieving mastery, and seeing tangible progress. Additionally, competing against others introduces unpredictability, making each challenge unique, there's a thrill in outsmarting or outplaying opponents, which brings excitement and a sense of accomplishment. Social aspects also play a role. For some, competition fosters camaraderie, shared experiences, or even rivalry, which can make gaming more engaging. There's also the satisfaction of gaining recognition or respect from peers, even in non-professional environments. Also, when he talked about being bad driving people away, he was referring to an earlier point: when players fall below their personal skill floor, their dissatisfaction with their performance is more likely to make them quit.

I twitch chat 🖐🏾 Also try teaching someone with no competitive background and teach them a fighting game...... Good luck.... Pro tip: let them win

Hexjuice bein' a widdle gurl...

The model reminds me of Animal Crossing :)

Honestly, that's part of what killed or crippled a lot of games that used to just be considered dumb fun, like Call of Duty, OW, Smash Bros., and especially Fortnite. Getting good at a game isn't the problem, but when getting good is treated like the only reason to keep playing, it slowly becomes one. The biggest example is Smash Bros. It's a goofy party game that serves as an homage to gaming as a whole, and there's a bunch of wacky items, stages, and bosses, all ready for the player to experience. However, people started caring too much about "balance" and frame data and refusing to use items or normal stages ever, and now, unless you're playing with a newbie or your friends, Smash Bros. is just another competitive game to rage at (just look at the pro smash community).

Me on my phone belly up barely recognizing any units versus the guy who scout every single round in casual TFT

God that model is awesome 😂 Love seeing it

I highly disagree with the idea that competitive=unfun. Some people enjoy solving puzzles, learning all the small mechanics, min-maxing all their stats, and applying them to prove how much they have evolved as a player or just to see where they stand among other people who have also invested into the same thing. By the nature of that mindset, they also tend to be the ones who just play the game the most so they stand out when "casuals" try to play the same game but are just not as optimized. I see this as an issue only when matchmaking makes both of those playerbases mix. I don't think competitive games are declining. There has always been, and always will be a market for it. But they are less popular with older audiences, because they require so much of you. You have to learn the basic mechanics, learn and keep up with the meta, keep practicing your skills, invest enough time to be at a relevant MMR. I think that competitive HSR is actually a good example of this. As much as you disagree with the concept- it does exist. Some people simply like the competition and they will try to apply it to anything they enjoy investing themselves into.

I'm going to be frank, aside from TF2 and some other shooters I might want to get into (or perhaps Palworld but still nitendo rushing to force their patents that only just got approved is the worst way to do things. Nitendo is trying to Pull a GW when they tried copyrighting space marines, paldrons and warhammers.) I don't have interest in online games. However seeing these games being shuddered (Not Concord because that game was hilariously poorly thought out) is tragic. Problem is these Corporations aren't willing to compete and we the consumers are suffering because of it.

Imma be honest, this model made it way easier for me to take your talking point seriously, I don't know why but it just does

Competitive games need a casual audience or else they die. Hence the premise of the video being "is competitive culture killing games". I'd say its more like you need a dev team with the right balance of time, talent, and money, who can update the game so that the meta isn't too stale and also allow for optimizating that doesn't completely overwhelm a casual audience. Though sometimes a community can just be bad and toxic.

I love 2D fighting games. I have a ton of them on steam.. I SUCK at 2D fighting game.

I agree saying they Left a game cause they are bad at it is wild like when I first played Fortnite I wasn't good at it at all but I played with my friends and had fun then I started playing on my own and got use to it the only reason I don't really play now is cause I don't find it fun anymore

Any game that is people agenst people you are going to have people who are sweaty it's human nature to not want to lose hell even games that don't have vs other people built-in you get speed running and other ways people make it competitive you just need to find the way you enjoy the game I personally am not big into competitive games but I have dabbled on the odd occasion I know how you're man must feel my Nabor who is not a big gamer gets annoyed with me when she gets stuck in a bit of a game passes to me and I clear the bit 1st try I just am more used to it haveing played games my whole life pretty much starting with my bros Ness up to now where as she didn't start playing games until literally 3 years ago

I feel it isn’t “woke” if a game tackles a “contentious” topic WITHOUT making fun of said topic or being blatantly disrespectful. For example, the gay NPCs in Persona 5 (I forgot the guys’ name unf). They appear literally only twice and they are there for comedic purposes. They don’t shove them down your throat. If they forced them into like 15 scenes, it’d kinda get aggravating since they are meant for comedic purposes, nothing much else. The new Assassin’s Creed I feel classifies as “woke” because Ubisoft deadass took a story that had questionable fact-checking in it, and made it into a game… based in JAPAN… and THEN made the battle music hip hop… why not make it something like what many JRPG’s use as music? They disrespected not only Japanese culture, but also African American people by stereotyping them over and over

There is something about you scolding us about not being on twitch with the adorable avatar that feels similar to granny scolding me and makes me feel guilty about not being on twitch. It's like a puppy giving me sad eyes while I'm eating food making me feel guilty if I don't share. 😂😂😂

Yeah, I left [Insert game here] not because it disrespected my time, ran out of content, and/or got repetitive/boring but because I was bad at the game.

For me this fits one game in particular "smite". I quit because of how ridiculous the other players would get. Im epileptic so sometimes i may zone out for a sec ect. I basically got tired of being told to un-install/ unalive myself because i wasnt playing exactly how others wanted(even tho i was trying). Will never play smite again strictly because i cant stand the community. I was very depressed at the time so having encouragement to un-alive myself over a game is pretty messed up in hindsight. Remember y'all you never know whats going on with that person through the screen. Be careful who y'all decide to cyber-bully. People have un-alived themselves before because of it. And yes bullying someone online to that extent can have real life consequences. People not taking this shit seriously but it is a very real issue with the internet in general. Lets stop excusing disgusting behaviour by victim blaming.....

hello twitchtube! XD

Titanfall 2 and For Honor are good examples of that. both games have steep learning curves and nowadays due to their age it gets a lot more difficult to get into them bc everybody who still plays those games are really good at them