It looked like a modern offset crash test to start with, buts its actually still the whole width of the car, just at an angle. So the whole car front is absorbing the impact,. Still quite impressive, although it looks like the body shell was at the point of starting to collapse
@byronnightingale555021 сағат бұрын
An absolute subpar piece of sht.
@ПавелЧ-и4д22 сағат бұрын
Более реалистичные условия, правильно
@waychillbroКүн бұрын
You have a typo in the description: four stars instead of five for the passenger.
@CarPro199313 сағат бұрын
Fixed! Thanks for informing me!
@waychillbroКүн бұрын
The rearview mirror or its housing broke the windshield on its own? It's no big deal, but I've never seen that before
@mikep.5517Күн бұрын
Shoulder belts appear to offer zero restraint, zero protection.
@Vanguard.I17 сағат бұрын
It got 4 stars in this test do some research next time
@b480451416 сағат бұрын
@Vanguard.I It caught fire after the crash. How is that 4 stars?
@Vanguard.I16 сағат бұрын
@@b4804514where did it catch fire, no fire occurred during the crash
@CarPro199313 сағат бұрын
www.nhtsa.gov/vehicle/2024/HYUNDAI/SANTA%252520FE/SUV/FWD "Frontal Barrier Star Ratings Driver Footnote: Shortly after the frontal crash test on the conventional gasoline version of the Hyundai Santa Fe, smoke and flames were observed from the engine compartment"
@Vanguard.I12 сағат бұрын
@ oh oops
@Tyler-zn2osКүн бұрын
same
@MQBevoКүн бұрын
thank you for uploading! where did you get these btw
@muhammadiqbaltawakkalКүн бұрын
0:28
@Mikehunt777882 күн бұрын
Wow that was bad e46 did better is this test slightly
@willdoestechthings26512 күн бұрын
Wow, this is terrible, that frame transmits way too much energy and defeats the entire purpose of a crumple zone. Extremely unsafe
@Therealkyan22 күн бұрын
Can you do a Hyundai Getz version 2008 crash test?
@OMG.RAFFVD.Chenon2 күн бұрын
ESCALADE!!!!!
@compu852 күн бұрын
For as bad as this car did in this test, it shows how life saving airbags are.
@compu852 күн бұрын
Know what the car was @ 2:49?
@CarPro19932 күн бұрын
Fairly certain it's a Volvo 740.
@조쪼쪼블랙쪼2 күн бұрын
와우 wow
@LRS9052 күн бұрын
I love that guitar theme. So sad and melancholic. Does it have a name?
@CarPro19932 күн бұрын
Song is Boards of Canada - A10 from Random 35 Tracks Tape (www.rareboc.org)
@LRS9052 күн бұрын
@@CarPro1993 thanks man!!
@EdgarSarabia-uu8fh3 күн бұрын
I daily drive a 2001 ford f150 with half cab type suicide doors manual transmission. Really fun, but what I just saw does not look like fun.
@chadbartley20633 күн бұрын
Them ev freaking joke
@ThePuffin773 күн бұрын
BeamNG has come a long way
@nathenstram66972 күн бұрын
They are due for a better graphics card. This is grainy as hell 😂😂
@nolanfisher7352 күн бұрын
@@nathenstram6697 YA LOL
@NoCoMpany7413 күн бұрын
A New Crashtest Compilation from Carpro1993 is what we needed Also Happy New Year to you
@CarPro19933 күн бұрын
Happy New Year!
@Triplechorus23 күн бұрын
Happy new year from Germany!🇩🇪🤝
@CarPro19933 күн бұрын
Happy New Year!
@meepmoop11233 күн бұрын
anyone have a view of ocupant space for the third row?????
@Christhegoldenboy3 күн бұрын
Interesting to see what happens to the undercarriage, the frame holds up surprisingly well.
@АльмирФаррахов-г9в3 күн бұрын
Why are there no crash tests for the Porsche Cayman and Porsche Panamera? Can they be carried out?
@ouch10114 күн бұрын
Watching these unbelted crash tests, it really makes you wonder how so many people on the roads still, in 2024, despite overwhelming evidence of their effectiveness, still choose not to wear seatbelts.
@badmanjones1794 күн бұрын
hey happy new year
@CarPro19933 күн бұрын
Happy New Year!
@00crashtest4 күн бұрын
I wish NHTSA would make the 56-mile per hour oblique front overlap test mandatory as part of the safety ratings. That is because vehicles perform very similarly that test compared to their results in the IIHS 40-mile per hour driver-side small overlap test. This means making the oblique overlap test a standard procedure would effectively make the small overlap test mandatory.
@CarPro19934 күн бұрын
NHTSA announced they they are adding the Oblique Overlap test to the NCAP program for the 2028 Model Year. www.nhtsa.gov/document/ncap-roadmap
@00crashtest4 күн бұрын
@@CarPro1993 I've seen a video of the Ridgeline undergoing the same test. The description said the testing scheme was planned for, I believe some time in the second half 2010s, but there was no follow-up for the plan. So, was that plan official or just in the discussion phase? Will the test becoming standard for 2028 be definitely done unless officially repealed?
@CarPro19934 күн бұрын
@@00crashtest I've since revised the description on that video to reflect this information. Before, the implementation had been delayed indefinitely due to change in office. This roadmap was released recently, and it appears that, as long as the change in office doesn't indefinitely delay the implementation again, that NCAP testing and rating should begin late-2027.
@anthony34564 күн бұрын
Zero intrusion on the Honda accord that car did amazing compared to the Chevy! DEATH TRAP!
@bh22364 күн бұрын
This model has a higher ride height (easier access) and larger back seat than the 2020 or newer model.
@ouch10114 күн бұрын
I’ve always told people that motorhomes are a _terrible_ idea. Combining your car and your house is a stupid and completely nonsensical ideal to begin with, with countless logical flaws. The most desperate and pushy customers I ever had to deal with in nearly 20 years as a mechanic were the out-of-towners who’s motorhomes broke down, because they had no transportation *and* nowhere to sleep (the breakdowns were almost always due to long term neglect on the part of the owner as well, because people seem to think that not driving a vehicle much means that they literally never have to do any maintenance ever). Now, add on to that they are complete and utter death traps. If you insist on staying in a tiny box during your vacation rather than a nice hotel room like a sane person, then buy a trailer/caravan and a tow vehicle. Do not buy a motorhome, ever, under any circumstances.
@panzerhell-ob4iz5 күн бұрын
parecen las fauces de un tiburon el frente de la F150 cuando se asoma por la ventana del conductor del otro vehiculo ,jejeje
@allupro5 күн бұрын
Oh so it's finally being added? Cool!
@liammaupin94926 күн бұрын
That truck is not a 2000
@CarPro19936 күн бұрын
The NHTSA entry, test report, and VIN decoder all state that it is a 2000 model year vehicle. www.nhtsa.gov/research-data/research-testing-databases#/vehicle/5180
@liammaupin94926 күн бұрын
@ the only reason I don’t think it is because those trucks didn’t have 4 doors until 2001
@АртемычКурский7 күн бұрын
О,Форд Мондео.Самое интересное,что видел на дорогах как и Mondeo,так и Fusion.
@mikep.55177 күн бұрын
It's weird to me how seemingly ineffective shoulder belts seem to be in halting the driver/passenger forward motion. If the airbags weren't there the driver would be leaving chiclets in the steering wheel and the passenger in the dash. In modern cars are the shoulder belts recalibrated to have more give and be "softer" to allow the 'bags to do more of the work?
@d3adr0s3s7 күн бұрын
honestly I think its just a ford fusion thing, I own one and the seatbelts don't really lock under tension like any other car would. Could be manufacturing, could be a defect, who knows!
@Timico10007 күн бұрын
Of course they are calubrited that way, to work perfectly with the airbag. If they were to "stiff" they would probably cause fractures of the shoulder and chest and increase the risk of neck injuries.
@americanrambler49728 күн бұрын
The crash standard was only 30 mph at that time. Almost 5 mph lower than this test. And these cars met that standard just fine. At the time these 35 mph tests were first done in the early 1980’s, the vast majority of the cars tested fared no better than this car, and in fact, many were far worse performers. I saw photos of other cars that did this same test and the dash boards were pushed back 12 to 18 inches into the passenger compartment, front doors blown apart and folded in half and the floor boards buckling and trapping the occupants feet and lower legs in the floor sheet metal. Remember, this is 1980! Only a very few cars offered air bags. And they were special order options. It was in 1988 these K cars were the first cars sold in the United States that came with standard factory installed air bags. For both driver and front passenger. Other cars which introduced the air bags only offered a drivers only air bag for the first few years. If they offered them at all! GM offered some test trial cars and a little later in the mid 70’s air bags only offered options of some of their big full size cars, but they were discontinued. The K car Aries and Reliant were the first affordable mass market cars to come with air bags.
@whattheheck10007 күн бұрын
In 1980 there were zero production cars in the USA market that had air bags. The GM system was available as an option for the 1974-1976 model years, and it was a dual air bag system. After that it would be late 1983 when the 1984 Mercedes S-Class offered an optional driver air bag. The Aries and Reliant never offered an air bag, but some of the K-car derivatives were among the first non-luxury cars to have a standard driver air bag, such as the Chrysler LeBaron (beginning in May 1988). In late 1989, the 1990 model Dodge Spirit and Plymouth Acclaim, which were the direct successors to the Aries and Reliant, got a standard driver air bag. Even the 1990 Dodge Omni and Plymouth Horizon got standard driver air bags despite being extremely cheap and about to go out of production! Every 1990-model Chrysler-built car had a driver air bag; captive imports such as the Dodge Monaco and Eagle Talon didn't have one, nor did trucks, vans, and SUVs (as air bags simply did not exist on such vehicles yet). December 29, 2024 12:29 am
@mexicanspec8 күн бұрын
I expected the wheel covers to fly off, but they didn't.
@Thamer_Ali19928 күн бұрын
Bentley 1990 has no airbag but ford has it 😮
@JayMcK-yj8ht9 күн бұрын
This looks like our Ford Fairlane LTD models here in Australia around late 90-2000.
@compu858 күн бұрын
Yup, except these were front wheel drive.
@australiantruckspotting88837 күн бұрын
The Aussie Fairlanes and LTDs definitely took styling cues from the Lincoln Continental.
@colbybrown40859 күн бұрын
Those were some pretty big airbags for the late 80’s early 90’s.
@davidnorton58878 күн бұрын
They had bigger back then because they knew no one used seat belts, as you can see in this test.
@Reaglesracing44_7 күн бұрын
could of saved by 30 percent switching to geico 😂
@pippinproductions9 күн бұрын
not bad
@willc55129 күн бұрын
Generation Z. Theres your $200 used car us "old timers" talk about.😂👈
@MondayNightRAWsRKO2024-xk9ew9 күн бұрын
Wow hard to believe this was 40 yrs ago
@LongIslandMopars9 күн бұрын
From new those cars sat with a squat. Never made any sense to me. They all looked like they were on the road for a decade and had weak rear springs. Put a load in the trunk and you took more weight off the front axle than was already being done with the squatted stance. Every other car maker had a level stance.
@willc55129 күн бұрын
That was probabaly intentionally done because of how grossly proportioned the weight distribution was. & to Minimize snap oversteer or whatever FWD cars do when too much weight is in the front on skinny tires!
@LongIslandMopars9 күн бұрын
@willc5512 whatever the engineering logic behind, they looked like they were carrying a load in their diapers....
@darrellspraggins79669 күн бұрын
I owned a 1983 Plymouth Reliant that I bought used in 1984. It was one of the best cars I ever owned. I kid you not it floated down the road like a mini Lincoln, it got great gas mileage, and not one mechanical issue. I gave it to my mother who drove it for 7 years without any issues. Great car. Scary how it collapsed during a minor dender bender!
@KevinM239 күн бұрын
People may hate today's vehicles complexity, but I prefer complex vs. becoming part of the structural integrity of a K Car lol!!
@corvairguy88449 күн бұрын
To be honest, the car held up better than I would have expected.