The irony is that the same Jarrod Kimber is desperately sucking upto to thee BCCI in the hope landing a fat gig as an Analyst at the IPL.
@codelucky Жыл бұрын
She speaks the same way in the movie as well. I came here to see her actual English interview.
@veev237 Жыл бұрын
Very well said. I really admire his speeches and England, so flawless. He consistently stood his ground on British rule.
@adamsh4021 Жыл бұрын
Paajeet tharoor
@abeidiot Жыл бұрын
super based
@paradoxaddict8978 Жыл бұрын
"Churchill is no better than Hitler"? What an uneducated bloke
@praywithalfred2 жыл бұрын
When you import the people you once conquered into your country and give them more rights and privileges that your own native born people what else do you expect. What a stupid thing to do. Keep flooding Britain with people who hate Britain and expect things to go well. SMH
@ramraghuwanshi2562 Жыл бұрын
They r there because u were here... U came to India illegally atleast we r in uk legally
@fernbracken2 жыл бұрын
just remember Churchill was hated by the welsh for putting MOD activity in cardiff which got it bombed so bad, but hated more by the french for sinking their navy and hated even more for stealing the food supply in india starving up to 5 million indians, but hated most in Britain for twice taking us needlessly into 2 world wars
@suneet68342 жыл бұрын
it is great to see atleast this generation of cricketers care for test cricket.. it is a beautifully complex sport.. Eng, Aus, India have great series.. Hopefully, the game has other stronger sides too.
@sharadjain24632 жыл бұрын
Yes you are right tharoor, Churchill was a killer who killed 4 million bengali people, but british are not ready to accept this despite their arguments are debunked again and again. everyone should watch horrific pictures of bengal famine.
@aishuraddi95192 жыл бұрын
How correctly he pronounced kannada 😍
@Sandip65212 жыл бұрын
I am Bengali and i know better situation of Bengal Famine because i read many books which was written during Bengal famines by famous Author !! I can tell you one thing for sure is Bengal Famine was well planned massacre which was done by Evil Churchill !!
@donkeydesiamericanprofessor2 жыл бұрын
Who saved the Taj mahal? Was it the maratha Empire or the british? Who created museums to save antiquities? Was it indians? Mughals? Or the british? What atrocities are you talking about, increasing agricultural land 300%, farmland under irrigation 200%, stop the burning of widowed wives? And allowing widow lives to remarry? Stop childhood marriages of girls? Send girls to school? Spend as much money on education as the rest of europe? Start universities in india? Who looted india? What happened to the Chola Empire? Where are all their artifacts, temples? What about the Tamil? Were they sent to Ceylon Sri Lanka or do they still live in India? What did the British do to india? There wasn't a food shortage during the Bengal famine in 1943, did any Indians send food to bengal? What about the British sending food from australia? How do you expect USA and Canada to send food when German U-Boat submarines are attacking allied shipping? Did Gandhi send food? Did nehru send food to bengal? What about vaccination? Medicine? Sanitation? How many Bengal died from starvation versus disease, malaria cholera small Pox diarrhea? Did British create famine relief procedures? Did the British send famine relief committee to bengal? Are the British responsible for worldwide depression 10 years before Bengal famine? How many Bengal died from starvation the year before Bengal famine 1942 what about 1941 what about 1939 how many Bengal died from starvation did the British horde rice or was it the Hindu Brahmin landlords? Where the British speculating on prices of rice or we're at the Hindu Brahmin grain traders? Did any Hindus send food to Muslims and bengal? What atrocities were committed by the british? Were those British pirates that were attacking Indian ships full of tea indigo to sell around the world? Did the British increase cotton yield? Increase textile production? Reduce the price of closing apparel by 50%? Bring the steel industry to India in the 1800s? Makes India into the six largest producer of steel in the world, in just 20 years, behind Italy and Japan? What are the British atrocities? Who was ruling India? Who was the local government? Who were holding democratically elected seats in bengal? British Hindus or Muslims? how many Indians were in the Indian subcontinent at the time of separation? 400 million? 500 princely states? How many people were ruled by Prince Lee states? 400 million? 95% of all indians? Who's responsible for the problems of india? The british?
@cinestory0072 жыл бұрын
Cricket is all about bet fixing and money.. thats why cricket never become global sport like football
@fdhut2 жыл бұрын
It is sad that after watching cricket for 30+ years there are only 12 test playing nations. Test cricket is dead as well as ODI. Cricket was never promoted to begin with. If ODI and Test cricket were promoted the way they did with T20, cricket would have been as big as soccer today or even bigger. Good video guys. Thanks!
@neilsonlindsay29583 жыл бұрын
Watch this and its no surprise that England just got whipped in the ashes. All emphasis on white ball cricket,and county cricket being treated like a second class citizen. Also Giles Clarke came across as an odious human being.
@subhammax1963 жыл бұрын
I agree with tharoor
@mehtabkausar3 жыл бұрын
Voice modulation Nothing in front of Gulzar
@charless14033 жыл бұрын
It's called spitting in the soup. Had Churchill not be here, what would have been the fate of Indians? Would they even still exist?
@prasanth26013 жыл бұрын
If it wasn't for the Churchill and greedy british leaders the famine would not even happened in the first place
@thomaskennedy57282 жыл бұрын
I am sure they would.
@claudiapost-schultzke72163 жыл бұрын
About Churchill He talked about the decline of the west in 1930. So far so good. Mr Putin talks about the same. The decline of the west Nobody is aware of this.
@lennykoss87773 жыл бұрын
🤔🤔🤔
@Phoenix-King-ozai3 жыл бұрын
Churchill was worse Hitler at least paid a small fraction of the blood debt he owes by being the most well known and Hated monster in History Churchill is celebrated as a Hero by clueless people
@exlncore75703 жыл бұрын
Delulu
@hervavengill87343 жыл бұрын
Those who condemn history are doomed to repeat it. Lessons learned. Karma says forgive but never forget
@freeplex5893 жыл бұрын
Churchill is a hero
@adityarai87422 жыл бұрын
@@freeplex589 For evils
@HarishBaburamanujam Жыл бұрын
@@freeplex589 Churchill is a villain.
@ZZSmithReal3 жыл бұрын
Really? I didn't know that Churchill set up ovens in which to exterminate an entire segment of people. You know, it's fair to offer criticism. No problem with that. But the lack of perspective. Churchill the same as Stalin and Mao? You get the sense that people say outrageous things just to draw attention to themselves so they get publicity for the book they're selling. I also notice he lives in Britain and is very well dressed.
@Ajay-d3 жыл бұрын
It's funny how these guys- even though they knew it's Srinivasan and his BCCI lackeys- were still holding back on the BCCI for maybe fear of being called racist? Everytime they were calling them out they made sure they called out the three boards and the men running them rather than calling the BCCI mostly, cos let's be honest, they ruined the game and England and Aus just followed uit cos they were receiving the bigger piece of the pie. Please call the BCCI out. They deserve every piece of criticism and most of it is warranted. They've killed the sport for their own personal interests and it just feels "plasticy" now, for lack of a better word. Thanks for doing this.
@vadirajkanakagiri50283 жыл бұрын
It's not available in India... Shambles
@cinemamusings23 жыл бұрын
Yeah, evidently they don't want us to see it. No streaming service would take such a risk.
@ravipeiris43883 жыл бұрын
Fantastic
@sheldonquamina96343 жыл бұрын
Beautiful, I can’t understand why the Americans and in Caribbean countries especially in churches they always keep talking about Churchill like he’s some saint
@mikestevenson23033 жыл бұрын
Churchill was not a good guy.
@gokulsundar46913 жыл бұрын
This movie should be out on KZbin for everyone to watch! I had paid for it to stream online, can't seem to watch it in India now....ridiculous!
@andrewmccloud85813 жыл бұрын
Hats off to you, in some respects, because you and your sources have managed to display an amazing amount of ignorance in regard to two of history's most significant individuals in a single sentence, which is quite an achievement. First of all, Churchill's reputation is fairly good internationally. We know that he was made an honourary citizen of France and the United States. He has various statues of himself erected in eighteen countries. And we know that modern day films that portray Churchill is a positive light are commercially successful, even in countries like India; so, this idea that Churchill is universally hated outside of the UK doesn't stack up. And secondly, if you really want to put Churchill on the same moral platform as Adolf Hitler, you'll have to come up with a list of charges that are roughly equal to: the creation of a fascist state in which the citizens are disposable property, the invasion and subjugation of twenty two neighbouring countries, the systematic execution of eleven million Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals and blacks, the conducting of medical experiments on live prisoners, the mass murder of civilians in occupied territories, and the triggering of a global war which lead to the deaths of eighty million people; so, we'll see if you manage that. But, look, if it's all too much work, just imagine this scenario: an Axis victory in 1945 leaves to a Nazi-occupied Europe and a Hirohito-occupied Asia. What would the world look like today and how long do you think you'd last in it?
@insomniacbritgaming16323 жыл бұрын
Why didn't other Indian provinces help Bengal? I'll wait
@liberalindia24702 жыл бұрын
Who said They didn't help . Uneducated Nazi
@vickyy20913 жыл бұрын
Weston media shit
@navkiratsingh58023 жыл бұрын
Respected Sir,You did perform your your duty quite conscientiously despite the all prevalent danger ........w,e the Sikhs, salute you respectfully for your truthfulness and bravery 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@tamalbiswas76793 жыл бұрын
If players are making more money playing t20s then why can't we just stop forcing tests down their throat.
@lalitharavindran3 жыл бұрын
Adore Sendhil from the first time I saw him in Heroes so many years ago.
@sharifaali94823 жыл бұрын
I have watched your fabulous documentary on "ABU"twice and it touched my soul so deeply. It does not matter where we come from. ( l have been in Canada for 51 years) but somehow our lives are always interconnected. You are a fantastic Producer. Hope to see more of your production. God bless
@YUSKHAN3 жыл бұрын
Don't compare the warrior Adolf Hitler to that criminal gangster Churchill
@கசடதபற-ற5ல3 жыл бұрын
Warrior? Wtf? Are you possesed with demons?
@Area94Productions3 жыл бұрын
Actually Churchill is so good person.
@acbacbacbacbacb3 жыл бұрын
literally starved indians to death and you call him a good guy. he was a disgusting racist
@andrewmccloud85813 жыл бұрын
@@acbacbacbacbacb Go on. Tell me how.
@acbacbacbacbacb3 жыл бұрын
@@andrewmccloud8581 "why hasn't Gandhi died yet"
@andrewmccloud85813 жыл бұрын
@@acbacbacbacbacb What? How does this prove your point? You're scraping the bottom of the barrel for this one.
@acbacbacbacbacb3 жыл бұрын
@@andrewmccloud8581 bengal famine
@anutapabhattacharya75413 жыл бұрын
This thoughtful simplicities are found in folk and baaool songs also.
@guillermomaclachlan10723 жыл бұрын
Churchill was guilty of several instances of bloodshed etc. The invasión of the península of Gallipolli in world war 1 otherwise other than killing troops on both sides. Gallipolli had no strategic value or advantage to be had at all. Later He insisted on the invasión of Italy in world war 2 despite objeción from other allied generals namely Patton ( more American troops were killed at Anzio than at any other Battle during the entire war ) who wanted to invade France as soon as 1943 and head directly striaght to Berlín to topple Hitler's goverment therefore ending the war quickly, sparing lives on all sides etc. churchill was truly an Evil Monster.
@studentshivam56503 жыл бұрын
As an Indian fan, I would like to say that I support if BCCI asks for more share but I also believe it should balance it's share from ICC. Let's be honest, nobody liked Big3 but India is still the largest contributor to ICC revenue and THE biggest market in cricketing world. Nobody has to listen to us but blaming BCCI for everything is wrong with ICC or world cricket is very wrong. Let's talk about wrongs in cricket. 1) Finance:- yes, this is the first point and the main point. There is zero financial incentive to play cricket. Unlike football, nobody wants to play for only *Finance*. The earnings of top cricketers even in IPL don't match to the earnings of top footballers. Also, cricket is mismanaged in huge way. Although BCCI should get the highest share, there is no fixed amount of money which is distributed to other Associate cricket team's every year(Football has this feature). Also, playing Cricket is....expensive...and very demanding in skill and time. Overall, what I am saying is that International Cricketers don't get paid enough in general. 2) The elitism in cricket-> to play cricket you need proper equipment and proper training. Look at football, I just need a ball to play it and size doesn't really matter ;-). 3) Also, ICC is not building enough stadiums in some very promising associate countries like Nepal,Netherlands,Scotland etc. ICC must partner with other world bodies like World Bank to build decent stadiums in these countries. 4)What is our end goal? Have you ever asked what is our end goal? Inclusion in Olympics will be good but then what? Football has a vision, it has a goal. Cricket doesn't have a goal. Now , few things I would really like every cricket fan to hear for a sec. Look in India, we have 1.5B ppl, that's a big market but that means there is very high requirements for basic cricketing facilities. So, the money which BCCI isn't going through somebody like Sepp Blater's mouth. They are investing the money they earn in cricket in India. You can even write a thick book on number of domestic/local/zonal tournaments which are played in India every year. The above reason is why I support higher share for BCCi(but not like that if Big3 model). From outside, you might even think Indian system and judiciary is broken but it's pretty good as far as handling these high level cases (most don't accept that fact). More ppl=more requirements=more money required Life comes full circle in cricket atleast in financial part. Oh and last part, Football isn't gaing shit here. I watch football but India plays so bad football that I've stopped watching it, FIFA can't change the fact that we have a shit team no matter how much Sepp Blater butters India for big market access. Oh! And those who say their respective boards need more money to play better cricket. You can check out the financial condition of BCCI & Indian team in 1983 when they won the world cup(Spoilers:- it was pretty shit). You need guts play good cricket, like Afghanistan or Ireland. Everybody can fade like Kenya or Netherlands.
@vamps_rock3 жыл бұрын
But... but... HE ABANDONED THE CAT!!!
@neo59733 жыл бұрын
Fuk the cat
@Na-eo1gx3 жыл бұрын
FACTS
@kronossonork69943 жыл бұрын
As Gandhi’s fast entered its third week, Churchill again wired the viceroy: Cannot help feeling very suspicious of bona fides of Gandhi’s fast. We were told fourth day would be the crisis and then well staged climax was set for eleventh day onwards. Now at fifteenth day bulletins look as if he might get through. Would be most valuable [if] fraud could be exposed. Surely with all those Congress Hindu doctors round him it is quite easy to slip glucose or other nourishment into his food.
@MarlboroughBlenheim14 жыл бұрын
It irritates me that these allegations are made, which are done purely for political means. Churchill was far from perfect and like all people had good and bad. To say he was the same as Hitler is hugely insulting to the people who faced Hitler’s rule. It also shows a massive ignorance.
@prathamtiwari82073 жыл бұрын
Well he was responsible for nearly 4 million deaths so he is somewhat comparable to Hitler.
@MarlboroughBlenheim13 жыл бұрын
@@prathamtiwari8207 please provide your evidence to demonstrate that Churchill was responsible for these deaths. Not repeating other people’s claims you’ve read on Internet forums but actually evidence that he caused the factors which were responsible for deaths (and not 4 million of them). So you’ll need to show that (a) he caused the cycle which hit Bengal; (b) that he caused the roads and railways to be flooded and unusable so that supplies couldn’t get through; (c) he caused Japan to invade local areas which in the past had been used to import grain from( (d) that he caused local Indian grain suppliers to withhold stocks and put up prices; (e) he caused errors made by local government (all Indians) and (f) he wanted and had the intention to kill millions of people. Can you provide evidence to demonstrate Churchill was responsible for all these?
@andrewmccloud85813 жыл бұрын
@@prathamtiwari8207 If you really want to put Churchill on the same moral platform as Adolf Hitler, you'll have to come up with a list of charges that are roughly equal to: the creation of a fascist state in which the citizens are disposable property, the invasion and subjugation of twenty two neighbouring countries, the systematic execution of eleven million Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals and blacks, the conducting of medical experiments on live prisoners, the mass murder of civilians in occupied territories, and the triggering of a global war which lead to the deaths of eighty million people; so, we'll see if you manage that. But, look, if it's all too much work, just imagine this scenario: an Axis victory in 1945 leaves to a Nazi-occupied Europe and a Hirohito-occupied Asia. What would the world look like today and how long do you think you'd last in it?
@andrewmccloud85813 жыл бұрын
@@BharathKumar-tr6th So, we've moved from Churchill? Now I must read up on something else, apparently. This conversation was never about British Colonial History. Maybe read the conversation you replied to.
@raghavmaheshwari71243 жыл бұрын
@@andrewmccloud8581 you Brits were here for 200 years Rise of Hitler and hirohito was during (WW2) What were you doing before that ,,,, looting ,killing, destroying local business , keeping us as slave Hitler was a racist mf So is Churchill
@VedPrakash-jq8lt4 жыл бұрын
Mahatma Gandhi jawahar ke lesson school se nikal Dene chahie
@sandeepsaurav6474 жыл бұрын
Churchill was responsible for the great Bengal famine of 1943.
@deanrutherford40633 жыл бұрын
How so?
@andrewmccloud85813 жыл бұрын
No he wasn't you ghastly buffoon.
@sachindandge7643 жыл бұрын
@@deanrutherford4063 I think British schools do not teach real history about their colonial past..thats why you don't know anything about the their brutality. The great britain became became great by looting n using india in pre world war n during the world war ..
@andrewmccloud85813 жыл бұрын
@@sachindandge764 Yes, the Indian economy contributed, more than the other territories (other than Britain and Ireland themselves), but 52% of the Imperial economy was generated in the British Isles, so it was no skin off of the nose of the British. As well as the circulation and investing into colonies needed to keep an empire running, especially one the size of the British Empire, so it didn't all 'go back to England'. That is fundamental in running a country and its larger empire. In the UK, children are (in regard to the empire) only taught about its brutalities, like slavery. But mostly it doesn't go too deep into world wars as it is not seen as important as many in the United Kingdom are not keen about the empire for a manner of reasons, and so assign different course material. In secondary education, students must attain a broad knowledge of subject areas, without going into details like the 'looting of India'. Clearly, the way they teach it in India is a direct reflection of education funding, mirrored in your silly comment.