Very informative video! I don’t get why people are so quick to judge without watching the full video, i loved his opinions on Le Corbusier’s thinking process, while still acknowledging his revolutionary ideas. But I do agree that the sketches had to be a bit bigger.
@viarnayАй бұрын
Looks like a workshop rather than a family house 😖
@viarnayАй бұрын
You have a point dude but your voice sounds horrible 😖
@patnotbat9956Ай бұрын
What a generous comment left by Frank Sinatra… 🙄
@SandyRegionАй бұрын
What a strange experience. It seems like an empty museum, but the building is the subject of the museum.
@lpzgrv20102 ай бұрын
After reading the book by the Savoye grandson it is very evident that the villa had extreme problems regarding leaking water, dampness throughout, heating problems along with having no privacy in sound between rooms. A beautiful design, but not ready to have anyone living there. The Savoye family complained extensively over the years.
@TheLalawitch2 ай бұрын
Can you show us how the building works? It looks like its going to fall any time haha
@jenniferkaski92452 ай бұрын
Love Mies Van Der Rohe’s work.
@you_dumb_for_replying2 ай бұрын
Love the blur that can't let me see a shit
@Dev1nci3 ай бұрын
My word you put a lot of effort into these vids, I love them! The facade reminds me of Peter Zumthor's museum. I love the surreal quality of floating the building but wonder about the covered plaza, it seems more claustrophobic and heavy than contemplative and slow, I'm not sure what it felt like in person.
@Dev1nci3 ай бұрын
There is a lot I like about the project but I am interested in relatability as I feel it’s one way to approach character and avoid genericness. I feel this is the weak point for me because the point of relatability of this project is (as you said) a bathtub. I think it irrelevant and slightly derogatory.
@Dev1nci3 ай бұрын
I think our over-sensitive dealing with historical buildings is telling about how architecture is currently approached. Scarpa demolished parts of historical Castle Vecchio because he thought it told a better historical story when modified while the Brutalists demolished massive pieces of historical architecture, so great was their confidence in their vision. Today we’re too scared to do anything 😂😂 but I love this approach actually. We honour the past in that way and acknowledge that time will judge our own work, either by demolition or preservation.
@Dev1nci3 ай бұрын
Like you said, it can be opposite. I think that we should start calling it ‘inverse’ because if you look at the Port House in Artwerp, it is ‘opposite’ in every way to the point where it doesn’t relate at all. ‘Inverse’ is a very particular type of opposite. That’s just something in my head and not a critique of the video but rather a critique of some other architecture.
@ArqMamba3 ай бұрын
Thank you! What a great video!
@GuusPijnenburg3 ай бұрын
Thank you for the work and research. Excellent overview and context. May you one day be the proud owner of a 'Barcelona chair.' BTW, Mies is one of my all time favourites as well. Best.
@rgriffith64764 ай бұрын
EwItsBad. Like forreal not great. Could have been so many more good
@pmejia7274 ай бұрын
Drawings are too small, displayed for very few seconds at a time and 80% of the video is your face talking.
@Dev1nci3 ай бұрын
I think you might have phrased this more diplomatically (especially considering how insightful and well researched the video is) however I agree that it might have been nice to see the master bedroom (with the circulation running through it) in plan for example.
@pmejia7273 ай бұрын
You’re right. I wrote the comment before watching it all the way through and he does make up for these flaws with rigour. The flaws persist, however.
@Dev1nci3 ай бұрын
@@pmejia727 Yeah :) I've been watching a few of his other vids, they're pretty good.
@royah-hd5vm4 ай бұрын
❤
@joegotz19714 ай бұрын
As a stand alone building this house did not weather very well, similar to Michael Graves, and the other white architects. It must not rain on their buildings.
@joegotz19714 ай бұрын
Richard Myer sure did follow Corbu. But Myer also found clients for his ideas. The Douglas House with the glass facing west was a disaster. Myers comment was that the site was ever right for the house. At least Wright told his clients to move the table from under a leaking skylight. I remember making home made skylights, they leaked most of the time.
@snorlax40215 ай бұрын
Who made the music in the first 2 minutes?
@Arckitekt5 ай бұрын
Her best work drawn by hand before computers which Zaha couldn't operate, detailing is wonderful
@lightbox6175 ай бұрын
I was able to visit the building about 4 years ago with my then architecture student son. Proof that details are of ultimate importance. Just look at how the marble pieces are seamed and the reflctions in the fountains. I do need to remind you that he and the Bauhouse were responsible for the Brutalist school; not all ofwhich was beautiful and became a great influence on Stalinist era construction in Eastern an Central Europe
@sergenisot8095 ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤ 1:11 1:12 1:17
@neptunevibe5 ай бұрын
Very sovietic
@bb-nq5qc5 ай бұрын
The juxtapositional layers of cinematography, description, titling at the opening of each sequence and the gentle and descriptive philosophy embedded in such organic verbiage , as conveyed through gentle dialogue precisely elicits the magic and raw spiritual beauty that Le Corbusier shared with us through his magical and pure design. This is not an easy accomplishment on your behalf, FourthWall. Very much admired and appreciated.
@user-yg9wm9cc7i5 ай бұрын
very interesting
@Emlizardo6 ай бұрын
Do the columns measure 87cm x 87cm at the base or at the top? They are tapered.
@FourthWallArchitecture6 ай бұрын
At the top! 🙂
@ESquadProductions6 ай бұрын
Where's the patreon? I want the 3d files! Currently a thesis student for architecture and am looking to do an analysis in VR.
@Nostalg1a6 ай бұрын
It's amazing how quick people are to excuse the flaws simply because it was done by Corbusier. If it was done by any other person it would have been demolished and forgotten. Yes there are good lessons, but most of it is utopian and unrealistic, not to mention the Unité is ugly to most people besides architects. Having 1k people on one building with green surrounding it and repeating it 10x or more sounds nice in theory, but would only work in a planet with infinite resources. Not to mention it doesn't create communities or cities.
@viarnayАй бұрын
Why ugly? I don't like Le Corbusier but the Unité d'Habitation is cool
@juancarlossoto50716 ай бұрын
Very Nice, but sunday school?
@stanlippmann21296 ай бұрын
Thanks for the video. But it’s hard for me to see him as anything but a genocidal psychopath. Just another Godless degenerate
@nataliehelferty14387 ай бұрын
I am Le Corbusier with God as I am Natalie Helferty God's Body as Queen of Canada and Royal Chieftain of Indians of America the Holy Grail. The Designs were Modern in 1975 when I was 7 years old. We were doing Architecture Designs in Canada of many eras to combat the Mountbatten and Moussolini War with their Evil Spirits doing Industrial Wasteland Designs.
@SlightReturn6667 ай бұрын
I have had the privilege of visiting the chapel once (mid-80s) and was simply floored. I'm not the least bit religious but you cannot help but have a somber, reflective and dare I say spiritual mindset as you walk around this extraordinarily beautiful building. There are zero "church-ish" cliches; everything is entirely reworked from ground zero. The natural lighting is so, so, so, so subtly and carefully done. It is much, much smaller than you might expect but it utterly commands the landscape. It absolutely heaves and broods like it has been there for a billion years. I have never experienced another place like it and I remember the visit like it was yesterday.
@viktorandersson78197 ай бұрын
It is an abomination only appreciated by the architects. It was abandoned since it was shit to live in. Please make architecture beautiful again. Stop building cold lifeless boxes of glass.
@shaiyanomamo37057 ай бұрын
A missed opportunity.
@emanuelhmingropui31497 ай бұрын
Did he own a concrete company?
@shaiyanomamo37058 ай бұрын
Great video. Thanks!
@jeremymurdochbailey8 ай бұрын
great work did you do the 3D animations also?
@FourthWallArchitecture7 ай бұрын
Yes :) thanks for watching!
@aggiesjc8 ай бұрын
I have no connection to architecture, but have found myself fascinated by these Le Corbusier housing buildings. I am very interested in the details and differences between the buildings in the different cities. I will add that I find these buildings ominous, and keep watching videos about them to see if I can warm up to them.
@daveys8 ай бұрын
I’d wanted to visit this building for years and I finally got to visit in August 2023. We were lucky enough to get shown around the site by an architectural expert who spoke fantastic English. I appreciated it before I’d visited, but to see it in person…wow!! It is a beautiful building, fabulous architecture but I was surprised to find that it wasn’t a success. Mme Savoie hated the building and there were issues. It leaked, it was freezing in winter and boiling hot in summer. Still, I think that it looks awesome and would happily have a home like that. I have other Le Corbusier buildings on my visiting list when I next go to Paris.
@najid638 ай бұрын
Hi, i've been watching your videos for some time now and i just want to give you some credit for the quality of the content you've been producing. As an architecture student, your videos helped me alot with understanding certain principles and having the closest experience i can have to visiting a building while staying at home. I really hope you keep uploading stuff, your videos are amazing.
@polar31328 ай бұрын
Gropius 16th and 17 houses in weisenhof
@planaxarquitetos8 ай бұрын
Maravilhoso
@nickmanofredda88039 ай бұрын
one ramp, one staircase…….I guess it misses a third solution: elevator.
@elysanchez8579 ай бұрын
Love this video, super well done and the shots show the building super well, more videos please!!
@trungNguyen-vf2lv9 ай бұрын
Subarashi
@beretman279 ай бұрын
Anyone who says criticism of LC is impossible, is either willfully blind or an idiot. Stop focusing on his stuff like it’s the bible. Go look up the history of architecture during his youth, LC constantly borrowed and laid claim to tech and ways that were not his. A few good ideas and having had influence do not make someone praiseworthy. Evil square-moustache man had influence, was he a good thing? No. His claims to efficiency only make sense in a world of constant expansion. We’ll see how LC and his followers fair in a world of climate change and environmental crisis. It doesn’t look too good.