I at one point was inclined to agree that the BMP-2 was universally better, but since using the 1P in Gunner HEAT PC, I once wiped like 8-9 bradleys by getting the drop on them, and the HEAT shell can penetrate some MBTs to the sides, even an Abrams.
@PsykoProduction2 күн бұрын
MG on top is for the loader not Commander! Cooles Video!
@sergiom99583 күн бұрын
I didnt knew they had tested the Merkava... very interesting...
@stefankaufmann82573 күн бұрын
Mountain goat ist ziemlich irreführend, weil man einen Kampfpanzer nicht im Hochgebirge einsetzen kann. Zum einen zieht es dir auf jedem grösseren Stein die Kette ab. Zum anderen ist der Höhenrichtbereich der Kanone viel zu gering, man kann also beschossen werden, ohne dass man zurück schiessen kann. Die Syrer haben auf diese Weise auf den Golan Höhen an einem Tag mehrere Panzerbatallione verloren. Und sag dem Ladeschützen, er soll gefälligst das Panzerschott zur Munitionskammer schliessen, wenn er länger am leben bleiben will...
@LordSargonvonAkkad3 күн бұрын
5 seconds into the video and you cän hear out the äkzent of the swiss dude ^^
@bobiwt3 күн бұрын
@@LordSargonvonAkkad 😭😭😭
@rs59743 күн бұрын
Nice vid
@PitFriend14 күн бұрын
A good overview of tank ammunition types! The one I would add to your list would be APCR (Armor Piercing Composite Rigid)/ HVAP (High Velocity Armor Piercing), a type of anti-tank ammunition used before the invention of APDS to get higher velocities out of guns. APCR shells had a dense metallic core usually made of tungsten surrounded by a jacket of lightweight material. The lighter weight gave the shells higher velocity while the dense cores still gave them the strength to punch through armor. The drawback they had was that due to the shell’s lighter weight they tended to lose velocity at range faster than standard shells did. They went away once APDS ammunition was invented as that had the same solid penetrator but discarded the lightweight material that let the shell fit the cannon barrel so it had even higher velocities and kept them at longer ranges.
@denverkirk7954Күн бұрын
Yes and the APCNR (Armor Piercing, Composite, Non-Rigid) an example of this is 2.8 cm Pzgr.41 used in the Sd.Kfz. 221 although in war thunder it is incorrectly named as an ACPR round. :(
@IS400-z6h4 күн бұрын
+
@mischaks5 күн бұрын
Looks like the old Leopard 2A4 without modern armor. Would this tank survive on todays battlefield?
@yaya_is_real2 күн бұрын
depends on the tactics used by the swiss and who their fighting. In Ukraine everything is scrap.
@wyzif6 күн бұрын
I am a Swiss Leopard tank commander halfway through my service. Thank you for the video, I literally learned new things about the history of the tank in my country. A few corrections and additional informations: the MG87 machine gun is operated by the loader, not the commander. The new thermal cameras, called WBG, are actually integrated into the new commander’s periscopes, which were replaced in 2009, while the gunner’s thermal camera remains the same. The equipment that was replaced includes the commander’s control device. Silencers are only used in urban areas, such as Thun. As seen in the video at hinterrhein (shooting range), the tanks do not have silencers. Great work keep it up!
@bobiwt6 күн бұрын
@@wyzif Hey thanks for commenting and providing additional information. I‘m Swiss as well and would like to do my mandatory service as a tank gunner. I‘m just curious: What military grade do you have to be to become a tank commander? I assume you have to be a Wachmeister?
@wyzif6 күн бұрын
@bobiwt Yes, I became a sergeant after completing my service this summer. When you join the armored troops, your role will be determined by your superiors, though your preference will, of course, be taken into account. I was chosen as a gunner, but you could be assigned as a loader or a driver (don’t go for driver das ist nef hehehe). After completing your basic training, if you’re selected for promotion and have applied for it, you can attend an additional five weeks of wachmeister training, during which you’ll be trained as a tank commander. I’m starting my new recruit school this winter. When are you planning to do your military service?
@bobiwt6 күн бұрын
@ Haha well I imagine it to be quite cool to be a driver as well. I actually want to become a Wm and maybe go even further from there. People often tell me I will probably have to become a Wm anyways, as I‘m quite enthusiastic about tanks (who would have thought) and would therefore be a good candidate. Unfortunately I‘m not old enough yet to do my military service :( Most likely gonna do it in three or four years. Would you suggest summer or winter RS for a tanker?
@wyzif6 күн бұрын
@bobiwt I keep writing to you in english because i'm a really bad german speaker. I think for someone who want to become a sergeant there's no real difference because you'll have to do both. If you dont like the heat aim for winter and if cold hurt your figers choose summer. and yea driver is not that bad but they usually don't know how the turret works at the end of school.
@aaron_m25056 күн бұрын
@bobiwt As a Wm myself, I would recommend becoming a driver if you're 100 percent sure you want to become a Wm. Because as a commander, you are allowed to shoot and drive, and if you're a loader or gunner, you're not allowed to drive the tank, and drivers don’t have guard.
@maximilianglaus98117 күн бұрын
Nice video, I’d like to correct the point about neutrality however: Swiss law prohibits the export of arms into warzones, while neutrality merely demands that you cannot discriminate between fractions of a conflict. Those are two separate things and the export ban could be lifted without being in conflict with neutrality and thus making arms exports to ukriane possible.
@bobiwt7 күн бұрын
@@maximilianglaus9811 Thanks for correcting me there
@Tsirkon7 күн бұрын
It would've been nice if Gaijin made a premium out of this, yes theres little to no difference than the tech tree variants but its better than the current ones they have which are a literal copy n paste + camo net. Would've been cooler if it was from another nation version.
@NiteAtTheFort4 күн бұрын
maybe not prem
@Euro-thunder7 күн бұрын
I love your videos and am trying to make similar ones hopefully i can be as good as you
@bobiwt7 күн бұрын
@Euro-thunder Thank you I appreciate that. It‘s important that you never stop making videos or give up if you actually want to reach many people. If you see, I had to make like 80+ videos to get to where I am now (and I‘m definitely looking to get more). For you, you recently created your first video. Now create a second one. Then another one. And another one. You will most likely get barely any views in the beginning but you just gotta stay right at it and the number will increase over time and blow up at some point. Just stay consistent with quality content.
@JohnSavis7 күн бұрын
This thing gets hit it's done. Literally doesn't matter where you hit it. Survivability is included te stats, and this has none. How did it go well
@Recat62177 күн бұрын
Is there a chance that we could see a video about thr 4S20 4S22 4S23 and 4S24?
@O-Allah-Hu7 күн бұрын
Many thanks for the video about the Swiss tanks.
@rs59747 күн бұрын
nice video!
@bobiwt7 күн бұрын
@rs5974 thank you!
@Paronak7 күн бұрын
nice video, are we gonna see an Ariete video?
@bobiwt7 күн бұрын
@@Paronak Thanks! Perhaps I can make one.
@ericpear42058 күн бұрын
Another piece of valuable information made available to all. 💪
@bobiwt8 күн бұрын
@@ericpear4205 I appreciate that 😃
@IS400-z6h8 күн бұрын
+
@BoomMaker42010 күн бұрын
0:25 when a haystack just eats a 122mm APHE round🗣️
@bobiwt10 күн бұрын
@@BoomMaker420 I got gaijined
@ericpear420510 күн бұрын
Very nice, I like. 🔥
@peteduch215110 күн бұрын
Look at the t34 hyped up yet they lost 35000 of them
@Leshyman10 күн бұрын
Thanks bobi
@bobiwt10 күн бұрын
You're welcome :)
@_WARJOY_11 күн бұрын
Чертовы fish state
@bobithethingy752911 күн бұрын
Off topic, but we both almost share the same names, lol. Nice video btw.
@bobiwt11 күн бұрын
Haha that's cool! Thank you.
@kurniawandwiwibowo356612 күн бұрын
can you talk about T-72 T-64 and T-80 how the autoloader knew where different type of round place ?
@uptonogoodashe776412 күн бұрын
Hey i noticed you have HE in your first ammo slot. If you didn't know you can click the ammo image on the spawn screen to switch which ammo is in which slot.
@bobiwt12 күн бұрын
@@uptonogoodashe7764 I actually didn‘t know I could do this in the spawn screen 😂. I always used to do it in the modifications menu in the hangar, where I then forgot to do it most of the time. Thanks for telling me!
@nicktasteless36012 күн бұрын
Spookstoon type of video 😂
@bobiwt12 күн бұрын
@@nicktasteless360 Guess who I got inspired by.
@PitFriend112 күн бұрын
Just one little bit of trivia to add. When the tank was adopted into service in 1952 its designation was changed from Objekt 730 to IS-8 as it was considered part of that line of tanks jammed after Josef Stalin. After Stalin’s death in 1953 and the subsequent “de-Stalinization” of the Soviet Union the new tank’s designation was changed to T-10 to both remove Stalin’s name from it and mark it as the tenth heavy tank officially accepted into service even if they were never mass produced. This counted the KV-1 and 2 and the IS-1 through 7 models.
@bobiwt12 күн бұрын
@@PitFriend1Thank you for sharing that.
@shockwave621312 күн бұрын
When people talk about these Soviet heavy tanks, it is always in the context of tank vs tank, rather than tank vs fortifications and infantry support roles. The Soviet 122mm guns were excellent for both roles and the armor allowed them to take a beating when making a breakthrough push. The 122mm guns were famously dual purpose in that they could act as impromptu artillery, should they come up on a position that may be a little too well fortified to smash through without softening it up first.
@bobiwt12 күн бұрын
@@shockwave6213 That‘s actually good information. Thanks for adding that.
@jackass625711 күн бұрын
Still the 122 was kinda underpowered for the tanks that used them, the 130 seemed better. If all your artillery is already 122 you want your giant heavy beast killers to have something better to compliment. Kinda seems backwards to just keep using the Is2 gun because it worked good then
@shockwave621311 күн бұрын
@@jackass6257 The 122mm bore size is just one common factor across the whole D-25 derivative gun family. The IS-3 had a velocity of 781 meters per second with its AP shells. The T-10 was firing the same shells at 900 meters per second because of improvements in propellant charges, longer barrels and the breech design being improved to accept bigger powder charges. 130mm guns were heavily considered but were too big to meet the size and weight constraints that the T-10 was limited to. The shell on the 130mm gun was 73 pounds by itself and was a major reason the IS-7 had a second loader.
@newerty129412 күн бұрын
T-10M my love 💕
@kris816512 күн бұрын
Why do the turrets on the Turkish Leopard 2A4 fly off when hit?? Like in Syria,some years ago... Western equipment...The "best" in the world, until used in the real war..
@rs597412 күн бұрын
Great vid!
@bobiwt12 күн бұрын
@rs5974 Thanks!
@cherrypoptart200112 күн бұрын
I remember this thing in wot being a tier9 and having like 60 or 70kmph top speed lol, didnt really played with it much in wt because of the T-55s being so good
@markmulligan57112 күн бұрын
Solid stats and history; so thank you for those. You did not add PSI or KPCM ground pressure, as T- model weights increased and decreased, and as compared to MBT replacements. Also crew comfort and ease of use, if any.
@klebinhogamepray778312 күн бұрын
T10m with a laser rangefinder?
@bobiwt12 күн бұрын
@@klebinhogamepray7783 Did I say laser rangefinder? The TPD-43 gunner’s optical sight was integrated with a coincidence rangefinder.
@klebinhogamepray778312 күн бұрын
@bobiwt sad that gaijin did not modeled it in war thunder
@bobiwt12 күн бұрын
@ I think the T-10M does have some sort of upgraded rangefinder. Just not a laser rangefinder.
@IS400-z6h12 күн бұрын
+
@plasma_zqqw916015 күн бұрын
is this an ai
@bobiwt15 күн бұрын
@@plasma_zqqw9160 No, it‘s not. It‘s me talking
@plasma_zqqw916015 күн бұрын
@bobiwt mb you kinda sound artificial mb 👍
@ddragon522415 күн бұрын
I was gonna post a long-winded comment debunking why you're wrong about claims you're making and just making false comparisons but then you said APS was objectively worse than ERA because it needed to be maintained and I figured getting mad at you for this would be like getting mad at a special needs kid for being special needs
@dukenukem838118 күн бұрын
T-64 is best of all pre 90s T tanks. Bm2-bulat is the pinacale of soviet tech
@Bruh-qb8ir19 күн бұрын
A Video about 3 last Soviet heavy tank would be interesting (Object 277,770 and 279)
@Ghent_Halcyon20 күн бұрын
1:17 again, no it’s not any more complicated than that. The fact that you contradict your self in that video, and in literally a few seconds, you say something that is true and also contradicts what you are trying to say, is just more proof.
@_jagerceptio_279020 күн бұрын
2 Things wich could summed this up pretty easily. 1. Russian Tanks field alot of HE Ammo since the chance of encountering a Tank is low. 2. The Russian Autoloaders isnt the Thing responsible for the Cookoofs its the Ammo stored EVERYWHERE ELSE around the SMALL Tank. If you run full load you can basically see that there is Ammo practically everywhere. The Autoloader in the T90 even has Kevlar Protection.
@rs597420 күн бұрын
Nice vid! Plus, can you make vids like red effekt?
@bobiwt20 күн бұрын
What kind of videos does he make that I can get inspired from? And this question doesn't make much sense to me. Why do you want me to make videos like red effect if you can just... watch red effect? I'm Bobi and I'm likely going to make videos like Bobi.
@rs597420 күн бұрын
@bobiwt First i love your vids! second of all i just wonder if you could make videos about the ukraine russian war(or any active war), and talk about the weapons there, how they are implomented, their stregths or weaknesse. :)
@thesayxx20 күн бұрын
The statement that the western MBT's store ammo in separate compartments is highly misleading. Some like the M1 Abrams and only 2 versions of the Leopard 2 do indeed store ammo in compartments with blowout pannels. However the vast mayority of western MBT's do not. Challanger 2 stores ammo in the crew compartment with no blowout pannels, Leopard 2 variants all the way to the Leopard 2A5 store ammo in the crew compartment. Leclerc stores ammo in the crew compartment as well as the Ariete. There is ample evidence that Leopard 2's and Challanger 2's can indeed throw turrets or outright disintegrate if struck in the hull ammo stowage.
@nucleus69120 күн бұрын
All variants of Leopard 2 store ammo in a turret bustle rack with blowout panels, and a hull storage rack without. Although its *kinda* irrelevant now for modern use of the Leopard 2 with the Bundeswehrs new DM11 and DM73 rounds, both of which use insensitive propellant
@Paronak20 күн бұрын
3:39 average TAM interaction
@LooWa0120 күн бұрын
The western tanks, except the Chellenger
@cybernetic_crocodile846220 күн бұрын
Hits which can cause the detonation of ammunition in carousel would obliterate the crew anyway, since damaging factors need to go through nearly entire crew compartment to reach it. Well, except for mines, they definetly are more dangerous to Russian tank crews. And in footage from Ukraine tanks are often detonated after crew escaped from them, leaving hatches open. That allows for easy access to carousel by drone-dropped bombs.