Whats with the random anti semitic comments lmao

I just realised that this video has more views than the actual film being discussed. Quite LOL Indeed 😂😂😂😂😂

About 3 years ago, I got so tired of loot boxes and gambling mechanics getting force-fed in every game that I was playing that I decided that the only games I'm going to play are old games and remasters of old games that don't support in-game purchases (with the exception of Retro Bowl, because that game actually has a pretty ethical monetization model, imo). I've reduced the amount of time that I spend playing games and increased the amount of time that I spend learning how to MAKE games. A few years later and I'm close to releasing my first open beta for my first game. It's been so much more enjoyable than starting a game and feeling that tightness in my chest and sinking feeling in my stomach when the first thing that happens is being bombarded with 7 different modals advertising limited offers, battle passes, and loot boxes.

He has a "I ❤ wood" mug??? 😂😂

I think your read of Shakespeare is entirely wrong and is based in the way Imperial era British Imperial culture employed his work as the banner of the status quo. In his time the embrace of individualism and naturalistic characters was a radical departure from the very very VERY very primordial status quo of medieval drama and its rendering of character as inhuman elements. Iago is not “Vice”. Shakespeare is writing in the era of the wars of religion and the slow deterioration of feudalism. He’s not late stage capitalism. He’s barely early stage capitalism in a time and place where that is a form of radical change from the status quo. I suspect you’re doing something similar with Aristotle by taking him out of his time and sticking a 21st century hat on him but I don’t know his era as well. Anyway… Now if what you want to say is that Elizabeth I supported theater as a political tool to shape a Protestant society into a functioning country after a century of everyone hacking each other to death over points of doctrine and Shakespeare was part of that project okay that’s fair but again that has to be evaluated in the context of its own era and not (NOT) the Victorian legend built around these people. They didn’t know they were creating late stage capitalism. We are 500 years in their future. They were escaping 1,000 years of intellectual orthodoxy and feudalism.

The main dude is the same voice actor that does the pig on "Drawn Together" 😂

I do like how Earth’s Mightiest gave Hulk and Banner a sort of Eddie/Venom dynamic… Where they’re like two personalities sort of stuck with each other and just have to coexist like in Venom’s movies.

Ah yes, Rick "I thought it was closer" Riordan

Disney and Overwatch 2 are the gods of slop

Why would you need to stop the comparison? Man creates his saviors when he needs them. It’s been that way across centuries, across cultures, across writings and across faiths. It will never stop. You can’t take the light away from people.

I never thought of this, the idea of video muzak is really fresh to me

Chess is woke. The most powerful piece is the queen. The weakest is the king.

I think that if someone isn't sorry they shouldn't apologize.

I wasn't even aware that he was MODOK in the series.

"Netflix's tried to make their own hunger game" What the fuck title is that? Why give this guy credit? Is the product called "Tried to make their own hunger games" by Netflix? This is the worse misuse of an apostrophe I've ever seen.

Oh No 😨 Tim Allen got made into a cartoon!

What is woke - transnational globalist megabanks big pharma criminal elements of military industrial complex sponsored by Soros controlled by interdimentional aliens who want to enslave humanity to build an AI.

Help, I think my left eyebrow might be woke

What was his response to Baldur's Gate 3? I'm rather curious

I watched the Eternals and i thought MCU fans are deluded ASF sayin this is a garbage movie, This movie was more of an actual comic book movie than anything Marvel has released in a while

Thank you

What's telling about him is that as soon as the Hbomberguy video dropped, he IMMEDIATELY made a call to action to his fans that he was "uNdEr AtTaCk" by a bigger creator trying to weaponize his audience (the same way he did before when he was previously accused of the same thing and his audience drove the accuser away from the internet through shear harrassment). He's a top notch manipulative narcissist and he does not deserve a come back in any way shape or form.

these weirdos are just cosplaying as adults.

Fantastic analysis. Was so refreshing to hear about the root of Superman’s creation. I was vaguely familiar with it, and the additional information that he defended working class people, even against the police, was the first time I felt like I could like the character.

Jordan Peterson,like Phil McGraw is nothing more than a pop culture quack!!😮😅😊😢

in short, long live piracy

Writing is so much more difficult than a lot of people like to make it seem.

Critical Drinker is a dumbass... his review for Big Trouble in Little China proves he doesn't have a clue.

Welcome to the internet, Ms. Ingram. Everyone gets terrible comments every now and then. And you're a public figure. Regardless of who you are or what category you're under, the crazies and trolls will come for you. They will only exacerbate if you draw attention to them, especially when trolls have your attention. Such comments are not deserved, but welcome to the internet and being a public figure (You should have been given the advice Ben Affleck was given after he was cast Bruce Wayne/Batman: "Don't look at the comments." He looked at one and then didn't look any further). Even before the internet, people would get mean comments (Like Michael Keaton being dunked on when he was cast in the '89 Batman because of his role in the '83 comedy, Mr. Mom) and they had to take them on the chin. You're lucky if all you get are a handful of mean comments (Boy, I bet actress, Rebecca Schaeffer, would have rather gotten mean comments. Instead, her stalker tracked her down to her home and shot and killed her. Or how singer, Enya, has had MULTIPLE stalkers, including one who broke into her home and assaulted her household staff while she went and hid in a panic room. Don't forget the Bjork stalker who tried to mail her sulfuric acid because of an interracial relationship she had and then recorded his suicide. Those are just a few examples, there are other examples of crazies breaking into the homes of celebrities). But I guess some mean comments are just the worst. Beyond mean comments, there's a particular facet to critiques. Ever since the terrible 2016 Ghostbusters, celebrities have used immutable characteristics as a shield against criticism for making a bad product or anticipating negative audience reception. Now celebrities use things like race, gender, and orientation as shields. Combine it with general celebrity narcissism and egotism and it results in a foul cocktail that annoys and puts off viewers/listeners/readers/whatever. Then they spit in the faces of people by automatically accusing them of some form of bigotry and having the audacity to lecture and moralize the potential fans. Saying celebrities are generally terrible people is like saying water is wet and fire is hot, but at least in prior eras, it was still based in meritocracy to get to their statuses. They had to be talented and they had to "nut up or shut up" when it came to activism (I don't think I'd like Jane Fonda as a person nor do I support her association with the northern Vietnamese army during the Vietnam War, but she actually engaged in activism, not being a keyboard warrior and complaining about fans. She is also an extraordinary actress, being the bright spot even when she's in terrible films like Monster-in-Law. That's why she was popular and successful for decades. Even when she annoyed viewers with her politics, she was still a damn good actress that could draw in successful box office numbers). Now we have a crop of celebrities who Hollywood keep trying to make a thing who have little to no talent and then use some immutable part of themselves as a shield against critiques (They're more disposable than body counts in slasher films at this point. Calling them a "dime a dozen" would be a very generous appraisal. They have as much value in their craft as the lint in my pocket has value, monetarily). They make things entirely about something immutable because they're boring, vapid, and narcissistic. Most people, especially in western countries, don't care about your race, gender, or who you like to take to bed (As long as they're legal and consenting, of course). They want something GOOD. Those aspects should be a piece of a larger picture, not the whole goddamn picture. That's boring and stupid if it's the whole picture. It's not bigotry...you just suck. It's like I'm listening to progressive versions of The Stepford Wives talking ("As a -blank- person or a person of -blank-") rather than an actual human. It's also a matter of proving one's self. Ingram was given the opportunity to prove herself in a major show, playing a major role and absolutely fumbled the ball. To be fair, it would be hard to make the utterly awful dialogue and nonsensical storytelling work, but could we not call for another take? Goddamn, her delivery was terrible. It's unfortunate she received racist comments, but in the end, she gave a terrible performance playing a horribly written character while using her race a shield against backlash. Unsurprisingly, audiences weren't impressed or endeared. Pulling the race card will not change the negative audience reception. It was bad and no amount of diversity can undo bad writing, bad acting, bad directing, etc. Also, normal people don't care about the skin colors in Star Wars. Marking off check boxes from a farcical list does not improve quality. Nor does pretending as if you're making a major breakthrough in entertainment when others have long come before you to break rules and traditions. Yeah, no. No one cares. You're nothing new in that regard. Give a good performance and then the audience will notice.

“No! He’s just dumb!”

It makes sense considering the fact that he believes in conservative values. He can't fathom the idea of breaking norms because he can't imagine doing that himself. His entire character is not one of an artist, it's one of an idiot born into values that don't push him to look any further than he has to

9:24 In Spain we say that when someone says they are apolitical you've got 90% chances that they are full blown open right wing. Like when dictator Franco dared to say "do as i do: don't get into politics".

Thanks I was waiting for something I can use to poke fun at Daily Wire

5:23 wolves would have historically survived if they "turned vegan", except thw right term is evolving into herbivores. You've got plenty of examples: panda bears, manned wolf (yep), and even most hoofed animals (yep, their ancestors were carnivores, as we see in boars and whales).

"What went wrong"? Absolutely nothing, it's a funny show, one of my favorites!

He is also a nonce. He sucks.

9:25 - obviously any time after women got the vote is going to be too modern for him.

if you don't have the big dumb head you are not doing MODOK. There are necessary aesthetic choices that must be met to call a villain MODOK, anything less you just made a generic villain. It isn't being a purist it is about adapting the IP to something that captures the essence of the character. Just like you can't make Hulk without making him big and green you can't make MODOK without making him a big dumb head in flying chair.

I mean the movie isn’t good but no need to make lies up about it

I’ve never liked super man

You need to tag trigger warnings if you're suddenly going to show Shadiversities face on a video lol

Those that can, do. Those that can't criticise. Think about how many idiot movie lovers reckon they could do a better job. It was funny on TV in the 90s but it's hilarious now. Like there's so many idiots on KZbin that think they could make movies. This is how you know what they really are BTW

You have to appreciate how well crafted the drinkers critique was. He didnt just dive straight the bad review, he scripted an arc throughout with increasingly bad takes, subverted our expectations with the occasional complete fabrication the delivered an grandiose payoff with the mother of all lies to close out... thats A1 character development... credit where its due.

Hes angry because of the black female protagonist and white male antagonist. Thats it.

The critical drinker is dumb as a brick... your patience critique this dumpster of a critique was awe-inspiring! Well done.

second screen ability is ruining TV. I hate you all. Do you also like elevator music?

Yes, next question

The guy’s videos suck balls

I have to say. I wish the comics were more consistent.... Dr. Doom, when written well, is an AMAZING villain who can actually blur the lines a bit.... I mean, even the Avengers, after stopping him one time, wondered if stopping him WAS the right call.... But then you have him just commit omnicide on an alternate universe just because a variant of him was better at everything than he was. But, in another comic, he saves his mother's soul from Hell, but in a way where his mother no longer cares for him.... And he KNEW what would happen and did it anyway. But then, in another comic, he killed his girlfriend in a grizzly way with some ritual. And made her skin part of his armor... which he later didn't even use again because the design was frankly hideous. I just want some consistency like he had in his short time in this cartoon....

Ronnie mcnutt??!