Mitre Cap
1:31
16 жыл бұрын
The Hale Duelling Pistols
2:42
16 жыл бұрын
QRL Telic 9
6:37
16 жыл бұрын
Into The Jaws Of Death
4:50
16 жыл бұрын
Monty on Rommel
0:39
16 жыл бұрын
The Charge of the Light Brigade
6:00
16 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@StephenBelcher-sr3zk
@StephenBelcher-sr3zk 4 ай бұрын
Snicker suede Drawn And Here we Go, War Waltz Invitation Too By RowRan , No , Thankyou very Much For Now Field Marshall: Our Masters Are Out
@kte1126
@kte1126 7 ай бұрын
Goosebumps everytime i hear this
@fly546amused
@fly546amused Жыл бұрын
Amazing video, used in my English class. It was wonderful 🙏🙏
@eduardocachocacho4655
@eduardocachocacho4655 Жыл бұрын
En
@notakiller
@notakiller 2 жыл бұрын
e e e e e e e e e e e e ee e e e
@swerve1960
@swerve1960 2 жыл бұрын
One of the reasons why Monty was so successful was due to the priceless intelligence provided by the cracking of the Enigma codes.
@MrTuftynut
@MrTuftynut 2 жыл бұрын
An amazing and stirring short film about this ever-famous but wasteful Charge, set against Tony Richardson's 1968 film - which is surprisingly accurate in it's depiction. We British do like to celebrate and elevate our military failures (as well as our many successes) such as Dunkirk and Arnhem, brave as they all were. Terry's book 'Hell Riders is an excellent account and highly recommended, as is Mark Adkins 'The Charge'.
@sean3691
@sean3691 2 жыл бұрын
🇬🇧💂‍♂️💂
@czenjafqli5847
@czenjafqli5847 2 жыл бұрын
Слава России.
@arifaustino5680
@arifaustino5680 2 жыл бұрын
Rommel o melhor de todos,,,,,
@dude861
@dude861 2 жыл бұрын
Monty was extremely lucky that a) Rommel hat FAR less men and equipment and b) the british decrypt the german codes - and he still had a tough time. Monty was a far less capable general than Rommel.
@burstcity3832
@burstcity3832 3 жыл бұрын
A nuisance! wow, thats high praise from an English man.
@brunovolk7462
@brunovolk7462 3 жыл бұрын
It was atypical British daring success 🤗
@jobairmahmud4931
@jobairmahmud4931 3 жыл бұрын
🥰
@klauszungler8930
@klauszungler8930 3 жыл бұрын
Monty, Romnel ran our of Disel about 7 miles from you and you would be dust
@klauszungler8930
@klauszungler8930 3 жыл бұрын
He made you shit in your pants Monty
@tylerdurden7500
@tylerdurden7500 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for making this video. My Grandfather, W.H.P Mourant was in the 16th/5th Lancers and was believed to be killed in action as part of a tank charge at Borj. I believe this to be Bordj Cedria which is at the Northern end of Fondouk and at the far end of the pass in the 'open ground.' (do we know the exact location of the Fondouk pass?) I believe he was in the dry waddi or river bed which the 17th/21st lancers had cleared. His death haunted my mother as a young girl and as a mature woman. She missed him dearly. He was only 33 when he died on 11th April 1943. If you have any further research material it would be appreciated.
@harryputang5352
@harryputang5352 3 жыл бұрын
Monty..it didn't happen. He went on the flight of the Valkyries 🙄
@winzplayz44225
@winzplayz44225 3 жыл бұрын
4:23
@thatoneguy4994
@thatoneguy4994 3 жыл бұрын
Nael Gay
@rizza0748
@rizza0748 3 жыл бұрын
who else watching dis for school
@winzplayz44225
@winzplayz44225 3 жыл бұрын
Ayy
@lord_chicken6967
@lord_chicken6967 3 жыл бұрын
hello evryone
@framenoodles
@framenoodles 3 жыл бұрын
hello evryone
@savagesnayle301
@savagesnayle301 3 жыл бұрын
Florence Nightingale did practically nothing during the war. She had no power to do anything in the field. After the war she proved to be a fantastic statistician who had made meticulous notes. She pioneered pie charts and graphs as a tool to present information to none professionals, and put forwards the hideous mathematics of military health care in a way politicians could grasp. her service and mathematical and logical mind and presentation of her findings lead to great improvements in military and subsequently public health care. She was the lady with the pen rather than the lady with the lamp.
@rpryce2140
@rpryce2140 3 жыл бұрын
"In defeat, unbeatable; in victory, unbearable." Winston Churchill on Monty.
@DogDogGodFog
@DogDogGodFog 3 жыл бұрын
This video is so shitty.
@stevehughes1510
@stevehughes1510 3 жыл бұрын
Bluster from Monty and rightly so however Rommel was a formidible foe and not one to be taken lightly.........too bad he was fighting for the wrong side at the time........it cost him his life.
@kitcarson7447
@kitcarson7447 3 жыл бұрын
Montgomery was a scumbag!!!
@perimetrfilms
@perimetrfilms 3 жыл бұрын
Great video for copyright lawyers to make some money from!
@StartTheGreatRenaissance
@StartTheGreatRenaissance 3 жыл бұрын
When you look at it, there was an initial mistake when the light brigade attacked the main force...If the heavy brigade had followed up they could have broken the Cossacks completely especially with the French cavalry which came to the lights aid....All hind site of course.
@bettycrocket1360
@bettycrocket1360 4 жыл бұрын
The one thing just as interesting as the video is the comments you can see history of them it’s amazing it’s been over a decade it almost makes me cry
@lengthmuldoon
@lengthmuldoon 4 жыл бұрын
Most evocative piece on the topic bar none with those first hand quotes from the survivors. Thank you
@PleaseSubscr1be_
@PleaseSubscr1be_ 4 жыл бұрын
Who else is watching this for homework
@sumaakram4506
@sumaakram4506 3 жыл бұрын
Me
@Ararenda2050
@Ararenda2050 4 жыл бұрын
Rommel era um general que não gostava de jogos de guerra na mesa como muitos generais de Hitler fazia.Rommel gostava do campo de batalha,de conhecer o terreno antes de entrar em combate. Winston Churchill, o então primeiro-ministro britânico, fez um comentário positivo sobre Rommel: "Ele merece a nossa atenção, porque, embora seja um soldado alemão leal, passou a odiar Hitler e os seus crimes e participou da conspiração de 1944, para salvar a Alemanha através da deposição do tirano louco."
@user-cq5me9dj2g
@user-cq5me9dj2g 4 жыл бұрын
Montgomery was a schmo.
@billhutchinson9277
@billhutchinson9277 4 жыл бұрын
Какого хуя они там делали?
@ganesan6503
@ganesan6503 4 жыл бұрын
ROMMEL is the man of victory defeat without supplies
@mohammedhassan9805
@mohammedhassan9805 4 жыл бұрын
Hitler: I'm gonna do what's called a pro gamer move
@hannahskipper2764
@hannahskipper2764 5 жыл бұрын
Monty sounds very British in this clip. I have deep respect for Rommel.
@williamgardiner4956
@williamgardiner4956 3 жыл бұрын
So did Monty but saying something nice about Rommel just wasn't what the Brits wanted to hear when they were up to their necks trying to stay alive and free. Rommel was a damned fine man.
@timothythomas7445
@timothythomas7445 5 жыл бұрын
Blood thirsty stupid fucks. For king and country my arse!!
@vivienneinfante2805
@vivienneinfante2805 5 жыл бұрын
My father was stationed in India in the 1920s, and played the trombone in the mounted band of the 9th Lancers.
@davidgoldin5759
@davidgoldin5759 5 жыл бұрын
Aside from the requisite trolls, it's a pleasure to read the back and forth in the thread to this video among people who have read about and know something of the history of WWII. Montgomery is definitely a mixed bag (ironically not unlike Patton), who displayed both positives and negatives. An enormous amount of credit has to go to General Eisenhower, who masterfully kept the allied coalition knit together.
@chrisd2051
@chrisd2051 4 жыл бұрын
Honestly Monty, Patton and Rommel weren't that different. If they were on the same side the war would be over in a week.
@Dnvr8083
@Dnvr8083 3 жыл бұрын
@@chrisd2051 😁
@paulanajao8032
@paulanajao8032 6 жыл бұрын
Chief marshall erwin rommel d last german knight.
@WuIIie
@WuIIie 6 жыл бұрын
Wommel was a twue weader. Montgomery was a shithouse who had one standout victowy.
@Phantomrasberryblowe
@Phantomrasberryblowe 5 жыл бұрын
William Alam el Halfa, El Alamein Medenine Mareth Line Normandy One standout victory?
@grahamhoff3867
@grahamhoff3867 6 жыл бұрын
As leader go Montgomery could not hold a candle to Rommel . Rommel lead from the front Montgomery sat miles behind the action safe and well out of the way.
@robertbishop5357
@robertbishop5357 5 жыл бұрын
If Rommel had his,way he would have dispatched with monty easily. He,was a much better leader and tactician.
@saadniazi9875
@saadniazi9875 5 жыл бұрын
Rommel was heavily out numbered.
@thevillaaston7811
@thevillaaston7811 5 жыл бұрын
@@robertbishop5357 Rommel never defeated Montgomery.
@Phantomrasberryblowe
@Phantomrasberryblowe 5 жыл бұрын
Graham Hoff Montgomery was the ONLY commander in North Africa who had the brains and savvy to realize that you do NOT outrun your supply lines by advancing too quickly. It wasn’t the lack of supplies that was the problem for Rommel. It was the fact that he moved too quickly, over extended himself and made his advances vulnerable to counter-attack. The British made exactly the same mistakes during Operation Crusader. Rommel had all the advantages at Torbruk in 1941 but he came up short and failed. On equal terms out in the open Rommel was great at fast moving armoured operations but he was pretty clueless on logistics and how not to over extend himself and he was not adept at overcoming fortified defenses. He didn’t understand that you do not EVER advance too quickly before your supplies can catch up with you and thus lay yourself open to counter attack. This is what Rommel did in 1941. By the end of 1941 he was exactly back to where he started from at the beginning of the year. Montgomery was the ONLY commander with the brains to figure out that you cannot continue to advance speedily in North Africa willy nilly. You need to be re-supplied and you DON’T over extend your supply lines. This is why as soon as Montgomery entered the picture in North Africa he only advanced one way. Forward and never backwards. He made sure he NEVER over extended his supply lines in a North Africa as the distances were huge and extremely problematic. Rommel didn’t have the savvy of Montgomery when it came to logistics and supply. Montgomery never outran his supply lines. He made sure he only advanced at a pace where his forces could always be re-supplied and thus he made sure his forward movements were never weakened and isolated from the supplies. This is why after Montgomery took over, there was only one way back for Rommel... retreat. Montgomery never even gave Rommel the opportunity for counter-attack as Montgomery never made his forces weak as other British commanders and Rommel himself did previously in 1941 and 1942. Montgomery was the smartest command in the entire North African war. He knew what it took to win.
@Phantomrasberryblowe
@Phantomrasberryblowe 5 жыл бұрын
Robert bishop Montgomery was the ONLY commander in North Africa who had the brains and savvy to realize that you do NOT outrun your supply lines by advancing too quickly. It wasn’t the lack of supplies that was the problem for Rommel. It was the fact that he moved too quickly, over extended himself and made his advances vulnerable to counter-attack. The British made exactly the same mistakes during Operation Crusader. Rommel had all the advantages at Torbruk in 1941 but he came up short and failed. On equal terms out in the open Rommel was great at fast moving armoured operations but he was pretty clueless on logistics and how not to over extend himself and he was not adept at overcoming fortified defenses. He didn’t understand that you do not EVER advance too quickly before your supplies can catch up with you and thus lay yourself open to counter attack. This is what Rommel did in 1941. By the end of 1941 he was exactly back to where he started from at the beginning of the year. Montgomery was the ONLY commander with the brains to figure out that you cannot continue to advance speedily in North Africa willy nilly. You need to be re-supplied and you DON’T over extend your supply lines. This is why as soon as Montgomery entered the picture in North Africa he only advanced one way. Forward and never backwards. He made sure he NEVER over extended his supply lines in a North Africa as the distances were huge and extremely problematic. Rommel didn’t have the savvy of Montgomery when it came to logistics and supply. Montgomery never outran his supply lines. He made sure he only advanced at a pace where his forces could always be re-supplied and thus he made sure his forward movements were never weakened and isolated from the supplies. This is why after Montgomery took over, there was only one way back for Rommel... retreat. Montgomery never even gave Rommel the opportunity for counter-attack as Montgomery never made his forces weak as other British commanders and Rommel himself did previously in 1941 and 1942. Montgomery was the smartest command in the entire North African war. He knew what it took to win.
@Rickster5176
@Rickster5176 6 жыл бұрын
Rommel was a good, decent man and a fine soldier but was put in an impossible situation by incompetent leadership.
@aw8079
@aw8079 3 жыл бұрын
Rommel was a murderer.
@warcrimeconnoisseur5238
@warcrimeconnoisseur5238 3 жыл бұрын
@@aw8079 So where the allies
@alfredovilla8560
@alfredovilla8560 6 жыл бұрын
The real strategist that won at El Alamein was called "Ultra", not Field Marshall Bernard Montgomery
@jimmcmahon8817
@jimmcmahon8817 6 жыл бұрын
Correct - and ULTRA won many other battles for the British too.
@davidmurphy8364
@davidmurphy8364 8 жыл бұрын
Just finished Hells Riders Terry, great book, thoroughly enjoyed it, good work :)
@semccalljr
@semccalljr 8 жыл бұрын
I had the pleasure of meeting Terry Brighton two weeks ago. He gave an amazing presentation on the Light Brigade.
@miltonSF
@miltonSF 8 жыл бұрын
Anyone knows what company made this bugle?
@Wolfen443
@Wolfen443 8 жыл бұрын
The charge was brave, but the poor orders meant that they were doomed. Lets separate those two facts in the first place.