Thank you for watching

Hello, we are using Eve-ng

Keep watching

Hello Engineer, Am doing well. The playlist is not complete. Working in the background for the remaining episodes. Will be uploading next episodes soon. Thank you and Please check our channel for other playlists.

@@ridewaner6294 Thank You

Hello, this website is an open source with many images from different vendors. Please check it out labhub.eu.org/UNETLAB%20II/addons/qemu/

@@LyfeyTechnologies it isn't going, help me check out what could be the issue?

labhub.eu.org/ The link is working Ok from my end. Please try again

This is shared on your LinkedIn, kindly confirm

Hello, please check the images from this site labhub.eu.org/UNETLAB%20II/addons/qemu/

The main difference between Option B and C is that ASBRs ahve to manage all customer routers. We also configure VPNV4 BGP peering between ASBRs for Option B. With Option C we configure VPNv4 peering between PEs directly and BGP LU between ASBRs. Check out this video on Option B setup and implementation: kzbin.info/www/bejne/oJbEfHisfLuigbssi=iqVFc_P53hL0Dx1W

@@medoelnahas7312 Pleasure.Stay tuned for more upcoming videos

Pleasure. Hope the content on our channel will be useful for your studies. Feel free to ping us on any issues you need clarification. ASGs and RSGs are normally deployed in the Metro and are part of the metro network for service provider. The standard mame is ASG but other vendors can have different name for them.

@@LyfeyTechnologies please in the case of IPRAM solutions if we contrast them with the MPLS service Architecture are our CSG router CE routers and our PE routers ASG routers and the RSG routers P routers?

The CSGs are connecting to the base stations. All CSGs act as PEs, or Ps depending on the setup.

@@LyfeyTechnologies so in deploying MPLS on IPRAN solution, what serves as the CE, PE and P in our deployment?

Base stations or the controllers are the CEs for mobile network, CSGs, ASGs or RSGs will act as PEs and Ps depending on the topology setup

Thank You for following

Hello, Thank You for watching. First I have to mention that with Option A, the VPN targets of the VPN instances on the ASBR and PE devices in the same AS must match for the same VPN. Remember you can configure multiple VPN targets on the router as we have done on ASBR. In this lab, we really don't have the 100:6 VPN Target, we just need to configure 100:5 on the ASBR and PEs. We can even use the same for ASBR and PE in AS 100. Hope this helps.

@@LyfeyTechnologies got it, that extra RT value was confusing actually

@@LyfeyTechnologies T hankyou for the knowledgeable content and for such prompt replies..

Thank You. Always feel free to reach out for any clarifications

Hello, please ping me on LinkedIn. I will share the PDF with You. Follow me on LinkedIn: linkedin.com/comm/mynetwork/discovery-see-all?usecase=PEOPLE_FOLLOWS&followMember=martin-indeche-668402115

@@aneleywondimu9631 This is well noted . Thank You

@@aneleywondimu9631 ping me on LinkedIn I will share the PDF

Very soon. Once we finish the two upcoming theory session. Stay tuned in.

Hello, Scripts shared to your inbox, Kindly check.

Yes Sir. This is Martini draft. We using LDP as the sugnaling protocol. Thank You

Can you plz explain it's difference with konpella, especially in configurations

@@mohaya9019 The main difference between Martini and kompela is the signaling protocol. Martini uses LDP while kompela uses BGP. I will make a lab on Kompela and share

@@LyfeyTechnologies thankyou! waiting for 1 :)

@@mohaya9019 Stay tuned in Sir

Hello, we already have a video on route import using route policies. Check it out kzbin.info/www/bejne/q6TIgYSqhpl0pNU

Glad you found it helpful. Please check our channel for more content

My pleasure. Am motivated to sharing more with my audience

Sure. Stay tuned for upcoming videos

Finally I saw it❤

Thanks for Your patience. We will have QOS videos in the coming weeks

Thank you! Cheers!

Hello @Mki-f9c. The idea of BGP groups is to add BGP peers with same configurations into a BGP peer group and then apply common configurations on the group instead of applying on each individual peer. This simplies confguration and peer management. You also apply policies on the group. Check out this vodeo that explains how to implement BGP peer groups on Huawei devices. kzbin.info/www/bejne/n4nbXpSVealpfJY

Glad it was helpful!

Coming soon!

Most welcome, please check other informative videos on our channel

Thank you 🙌. stay tuned in for more upcoming videos

Thanks for watching and supporting us. Stay tuned for more upcoming videos Sir

Thank You too and keep watching and learning from videos on our channel

@@cciecollabv2666 Hello, the series is still on and we will also cover QOS implementation on IPRAN. Kindly stay tuned for the upcoming videos.

Hello @mohaya9019, the objective of using the VPN instances or the VRFs is to separate traffic or routing information for different customers. If we do the normal ipv4 family peering, the customer routes will be the global routing table and it will be difficult to isolate and control the routes and traffic of different customers. So we do VPN peering to CEs in the respective VPN instances. I hope this is clear enough.

@@LyfeyTechnologies thank-you for the prompt and clear explanation. Be blessed

And that is the layer 2 vpn where the SP routers are unaware of layer 3 ip info of the customer sites, right?

@@mohaya9019 This is L3VPN, The PE router is handling the routing information of the customer. The same information is advertised to remote PE and imported to the routing table based on the VPN target. We will have Lab simulations on L2VPN in upcoming videos.

@@mohaya9019 You Welcome Sir. Stay tuned in for more upcoming videos on our channel and feel free to reach out for clarifications

Hello again. Thanks for watching and commenting for clarification. The Loopbacks on CEs are used to simulate network/prefixes connected to the CEs and we have advertised them to BGP. We have two options to advertise these loopbacks: 1) Using network commands on the CEs in the BGP configuration and 2) importing the direct routes. Both options can achieve the objective of having the Loopback IPs advertised to PEs via EBGP. Again, the reason of using the VPNs is to separate the routing information and the traffic from customers. We are creating multiple logical routers within one physical router. Let me know if this is clear.

@@LyfeyTechnologies thanks a lot. Cleared well

Thank You. Feel free to reach out and ask question about the topic

Hi James, The Outer Label is the transport tunnel that is swapped by the P routers in the MPLS backbone network when the packet is moving the local PE to the remote PE. The inner label is the VPN label that helps the egress PE to identify the outgoing interface to forward the unlabeled packet. RD (Route Distinguisher) is used to make VPNv4 prefixes unique in the service provider network allowing customers to use overlapping addressing space. Route target (RT) control route import and export among PEs

@@LyfeyTechnologies thanks for the clarification

Hello Shahab, ping me on LinkedIn and I will share with you

Hello Sir, Just ping me on LinkedIn account and I will share

@@LyfeyTechnologies My freind share here , ur tube followers need it as well thanks

Hello @cciecollabv2666 , Am working on a common repo where the files and script can be publicly accessible to any interested interested. Will share the link for all to use to download the files.

Hi, what's the reason to configure sub interface between both ASGs and then enable isis I mean why can't we configure both main interfaces and enable isis and create p2p link, please explain

​@@imranaslam8672 Hello, Thank you for reaching out. We need to implement access and aggregation IS-IS processes on the one physical link interconnecting the two ASGs. Using sub-interfaces is one easy way to implement it. You can also decide to configure multi-instance IS-IS on the interlink and enable the access and aggregation process on the physical link. Both can achieve the same results.