Engineers: how much money can this make me Physicists: cool
@QuantumLab-bt7yq20 күн бұрын
At the 12 second mark you label the laser. At the 16 second mark you label the beam splitter. There is a lense between the laser and beam splitter. Why no label for the lense??? It is critical. Without it no interference pattern. I tried to build my own interferometer based on your presentation. Leaving out the lense is very misleading.
@whiskeyechomegaАй бұрын
Did you know we can use the same principal for lenz effect on anti matter reaction?
@nguyenxuansonАй бұрын
now if the diameter of the copper pipe is bigger, will the magnetic ball falls more slowly or faster?
@leafyleafyleafАй бұрын
One of the lesser known outtakes of the Blue Man Group, which, upon reflection, was a mismatch made in heaven.
@acephysics123Ай бұрын
Hi I’m working on a KZbin video discussing Faraday’s Law, and your demonstration is fantastic. Would it be okay to use a brief clip of this video to help explain the concept in my own content? I’ll make sure to credit you and link back to your channel. Thank you for the great work, and I look forward to hearing from you!
@bleh96892 ай бұрын
Bro taught better than my teacher
@zzzluvsk2 ай бұрын
Yurr
@GamesBond.0072 ай бұрын
Why is the beam which is reflected by the beam splitter go through it when it comes back, instead of being reflected again like the first time ? Makes no sense really, as the material and angle remain the same. So what changed ? Also, can you cover the mirror on the right, Im currious if you will see anything on the wall, since the other beam seems to be reflected back into the laser by the beam splitter, after its reflected by the lower mirror. Or only half of it is reflected back into the laser ? But then the mirror on the right also refracts half of it back into the laser. Which causes the same interferrence as they combine, plus an aditional one with the new laser beam. How is this setup accurate in measuring the interference, if two quarters of the previous beam goes back into the laser and interfere with themselves and also with the new beam emmited by the laser ? It seems like a total mess.
@youtubeforcedmetomakeahandleАй бұрын
Did you figure it out? My textbook mentions that for the returned (initially reflected ray) once again a split does happen that is some portion is reflected and the other is transmitted, but only the transmitted one is relevant to us. But that just raises another question if 50% is indeed reflected back then doesn't it interfere with our coming light?
@djorfuusk2 ай бұрын
1:14 marks the moment when parts have been edited out WTF
@jeremywilcox2 ай бұрын
It is nice to see in real just what one has been taught and thought one understood.
@silver-ep8wn3 ай бұрын
wonderful demonstration!
@mwerensteijn3 ай бұрын
Thank you for making this video!
@ShopperPlug3 ай бұрын
Why use cesium, isn't radioactive? I thought the original experiment used silver atoms.
@NoahFectАй бұрын
They would've used Cs133, which isn't radioactive. As for the choice of cesium versus silver, long story but suffice it to say that S&G had a REALLY hard time getting their experiment to work with silver. Cesium is easier to ionize with the hot wire that he shows briefly, and once ionized, it's much easier to detect.
@ShopperPlugАй бұрын
@ Thanks for the reply. This makes sense now. You seem to know a lot about this subject.
@grzegorzdomagala99293 ай бұрын
Very high quality video - simple explanation for non-physicist like me and they even added some numerical data (field strenght) for mote advanced audience.
@dani.b-i7z3 ай бұрын
Earth is flat
@Henry-r2f3 ай бұрын
Could have been just as easily done using a cheap cigar...
@Ruhgtfo3 ай бұрын
Bugs should get their Nobel prize too
@weimullerjohann91183 ай бұрын
PORCA MISERA . Hier fehlt doch noch etwas entscheidendes. Hier wird nur 1/4 des Experiments gezeigt ? Das Experiment ist nur beschränkt aussagefähig. Plasma welches leitet ist doch wieder etwas anderes. Fakt: a) wenn man 2x Ladungsplatten verwendet, kann man einen Elektronenstrahl ablenken nach obe oder unteren oder zur Seite. b) wenn polarisiertes Licht oder polarisierte Mikrowelle bekommt man nach dem Magneten eine Gleichverteilung allerdings man hat oben und unten an der Projektionsfläche vermutlich dann eine unterschiedliche Drehung der Polarisationsebene c) hat man noch einen Scutter für nach oben oder unten polarisiertes Licht so bekommt man an der Projektionsfläche 2 scharf getrennte Polarisationen. Zusammenfassung es ist nur ein Polarisationsexperiment Das andere ist böswilliger Bluff. Man kann natürlich Silberionen durch einen gesonderten Kondensator noch laden. Das ist aber wieder etwas anderes. Silberionen sind doch massenträge ? Man braucht schon ein getaktetes kleines MRT oder ein echtes funktionierendes Drehspektrometer. mit EM - Polarisationsfiltern.
@pranavkrizz15534 ай бұрын
Welcome to all the first year engineering students !
@thegr88444 ай бұрын
happy birthday 🎉🎉🎉🎂🎂🎂🎂
@Artsmitica5 ай бұрын
What an amazing video. Thank you for sharing !
@isithadinujaya87245 ай бұрын
Thank you so much.. Really helped a lot!❤
@Cnotbalance5 ай бұрын
❤
@scienceotherside20005 ай бұрын
Beautiful video!
@sidi2aasaa5455 ай бұрын
Now fill it with liquid nitrogen
@noahcole68565 ай бұрын
Bible?
@mohammedboumhaoui83015 ай бұрын
Thanks for the simplicity, I spent 2 days from my time without any results in other channel but here just 2 minutes I understand the principle of interferometre
@أبوهشام-م2ر6 ай бұрын
قال الرسول عليه الصلاة والسلام : " اللهم إني أعوذ بك من زوال نعمتك وتحوِّل عافيتك وفجاءة نقمتك وجميع سخطك" . رواه مسلم
@jetboy18916 ай бұрын
I love these straight forward explanations of physics! Similar to the explanation of the special theory of relativity. Very cool (and nice work)! This is lecture room 26-100 right?(spent many a hour in the back right corner trying to keep up ;) )
@joestute64346 ай бұрын
There is something between the laser and the beam splitter. Why did you not identify it?
@TheWadetube6 ай бұрын
Half way through I understood the point of the experiment and shifted to the right in my seat.
@iainmackenzieUK6 ай бұрын
could have added a velocity selector fairly easily to sharpen the peaks...??
@13.c.s6 ай бұрын
0:55
@p1x3lman7 ай бұрын
This powers most dwarven warmachines
@patindaytona7 ай бұрын
He charged the tinsel so it has a positive charge before he used the plexiglass on it?
@pedroalonso76067 ай бұрын
1:42 Wilsooooon!!!
@CyberCheese3927 ай бұрын
Ohh at first I thought there was a force being generated from the throwing, causing the spinning on whatever they are sitting on
@zhavlan12587 ай бұрын
Обращаюсь к Вам с предложением на совместное изобретения ГИБРИД гироскопа из некруглых, ДВУХ катушек с новым типом оптического волокна с «полой сердцевиной из фотоно-замещенной вакуумной зоной или (NANF)», где - свет в каждом плече проходит по 48000 метров при этом, не превышает параметры 40/40/40 см., и вес - 4кг. Предприятия по выпуску "Волоконно-оптических гироскопов" может выпускать ГИБРИД гироскопы, для учебно практического применения в школах и высших учебных заведений. Эйнштейна мечтал измерить скорость поезда, самолёта - через опыт Майкельсона Морли 1881/2024 г., и только тогда, опыт будет выполнен больше чем 70%. Это возможно выполнить с помощью оптоволоконного ГИБРИД гироскопа. Вот исходя из выполненного более 70% опыта Майкельсона, возможно доказать постулаты: Свет - это упорядоченная вибрация гравитационных квантов и доминантные гравитационные поля корректируют скорость света в вакууме. (Мы, не ищем эфир, мы увидим работу квантов гравитации) В итоге увидите *теорию всего* в простом учебном устройстве и новую рулетку, чтобы измерить Вселенную.
@mjp216667 ай бұрын
I mean again. A funny name for something important. Oh, it's Lance law and that's it. You guys are so fuck*** stupid. I can't believe. Why nobody sees. There is a different force. A new force or the old one you forgot about? Yeah, arabellent for us. And rebellion force. Why people just? Repeating bitch*** without thinking about what's happened to you. Maybe you should look. How this really? Slow things down. What happened when you shoot it, put it in it. Will it stop? I made this test and it stops a bullet. Fuck*** because they're breaking it stands to square. Right from the get-go. Electric first start slow. You stupid fuck* and
@mjp216667 ай бұрын
ja sebst centrierend ist es auch noch
@mjp216667 ай бұрын
soll mal einen würfelmagnet eine kupfertafel runterrollen lassen der rollt überschlägt sich würde dabei ständig dipole wechsel na dämmerts das der falsch liegt mit seiner behauptung das der widerstand an der wand grösser ist als in der mitte nix mit elektromanetismus einfach nur nachgeplappert ohne eigengedanken
@JeshuSavesEndTimeMinistry21C7 ай бұрын
Beautiful effect Wave Indicates Light's Medium
@ngonidzashemwanjira2087 ай бұрын
This is such a clear and concise video. I love it
@maxanglade7 ай бұрын
Expression for the final speed is : ((1024/45)*mg*a^4)/(e*gamma*mu*M^2)