Well explained

His lectures are top notch 😊

Your videos are edifying , iam glady iam here.

Simple and precise 😅😂, send more videos about these theories... Thank you.

MAKES ITS PROFITS FROM THE STARVING NATIONS ANOTHER PRODUCT FOR YOU TO BUY YOU'LL KEEP PAYING UNTIL YOU BUYYYY

Everyone you welcome to malasya UNHcR Malaysia UNHcR help me country USA help me country USA help My UNHcR Malaysia

Been searching for an answer. And an old 12 years old video teaches me more than I want

Because of the international rich and powerful networks which have a tons of money and tons of weapons, mercenaries...it is allready a state of unfair and chaos criminal system... in a peaceful anarchy it maybe would be someing else, but there allways have to be some psychopaths who think they have the right to power and killing like it allways was...

You goddamn right

Jacobson Falls

Great sir....watching from New Delhi. I am a tutor of Politics.

I love the simplicity

This explains why the US is so afraid of China's ascension. NATO's expansion towards Russia also explains the Ukraine war.

Interesting.

Very important explanation .useful to understand the power of sec.council

This isn't anarchy. It's a corruption of the term. Larger, more powerful governments attempt to effect their more powerful statuses upon the weaker/smaller. IOW, there is a hierarchy. Anarchy means without hierarchy. Think of the US effecting social instability on various governments and attempting to install puppet governments and that kind of thing. Since when is coercion, anarchy? Larger governments, such as the USA, function, or attempt to function, as the 'international police' or 'centralized body of the monopoly on violence'. That's why, or in part why, you get an arms race. The lack of trust in the face hierarchy-- a power-threat-- is just that, hierarchy, not anarchy. Furthermore, governments of (nation-)States, large or small, operate on various forms of coercion over their populations. IOW, you can't just describe the top of a hierarchy, while ignoring other levels, and then suggest that it's anarchic. It isn't anarchic because there're lower levels and because even if the lower levels were all uncoerced, larger State governments can attempt to control other governments. Alfred Cuzan revisited his old essay with a new one. I have to re-read it, but at first read, it seemed like he was doing some intellectual pretzelling. But his old essay made that same mistake, that governments are in anarchy. They are not just because one wants to ignore how they operate and what makes them a nation-State government.

Succinct clarity!

Well said, thank you. Your teachings are very much appreciated. If you have the time, think it’s worth talking about and take requests, can you please do a video about what internal colonization means.

There are very obvious flaws with the theory, but the explanation of it was good. Contrary to the theory, the the CC group certainly does help the lower groups with things like medicine, technology, etc. that they would not have on their own. In reality, there is no restriction prevnting the poorer groups from helping the other poorer groups, and that is quite often how economic upward mobility occurs. Independence and generosity tends to lead to prosperity for everyone, and despite the ever-present existence of greed, corruption, and exploitations in every economic system, free-market forces, absent authoritarian collusion, trend toward mutual independence and prosperity. Also, contrary to the theory, the rich of the CC over-throw the rich of the lower groups all the time, so new (and often unintended) ruling classes emerge. It's not unusual for lower groups to form social, cultural, religious, or economic alliances, so, again, contrary to the theory, they are not always colluding to keep the current power structures in place. Again, the violence (in any group) is primarily due to authoritarian structures that wield their monopolies of legal violence upon others. Societies of free and voluntary association with little authoritarianism can only afford the cost of war when it's in self-defense. The US uses to be free, then the economy was taken over by the Fed, a federal income tax was instituted (which was always promised to be temporary), which provided unlimited funding for the military industrial complex. The citizens have no choice but to support the war machine in taxes and in selective service, else they face imprisonment or death. It's always the authoritarianism that leads to poverty and death.

We believe in Zambia Kuchalo, but being used as an example of being the periphery of the periphery is sad.

Well done. I write super hero books, The Atomicas Series, and am researching the UN. Great video and information!

Anyone for Telangana hyderabad😊

waww it's 12 years ago i'm in shock

Thank you.

12 years have passed

This rule should be changed. This is inhuman

Me coming for my college assignment😁

very good video

Thank you for this❤

We love Allen Sens.

2024

Who is here because of xam

@allensens,12 years later, your explanations are still saving and teaching many. You are a great teacher! I hope you are still sharing the power that you have. well done!

Thank you so much. i was lost in this theory, but your expectations are very good, and I am now confident about it now

i love this videos ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤😊😊😊😊

Incredible. I wish I do my Master's Degree with this UBC

Plz sir continue your lectures ❤

You often confuse state and government

why did you have stoped creating such a remarkable content sir? we need more of these videos

Expertly explained. thank you.

This is powerful! Thanks

From India ..Very clearly explained ..

Dependency must be financial.But the 2 thousand that i know dependent for no reason.why they are dependent i don't know?They are good at reasoning to be dependent.I can't change their life.

It's 2024, and this is the best video I've watched that explains Security dilemma well

Extra odinary explanation

well-explained sir

Incredibly well-crafted piece; akin to a book that offered a comprehensive view. "Game Theory and the Pursuit of Algorithmic Fairness" by Jack Frostwell

Very good lesson sir Sandeep badesron from India

Very good lecture sir Sandeep badesron from India Thanks

Very good sir From India Sandeep badesron