Ask your psychiatrist.

We’ve explained everything to you over and over again, but you prefer to remain ignorant. You’re a time waster, nothing more.

@@Bnslamb thanks, you obviously realized that I vacuumed you all the knowledge. That’s why you are on damage control trying to deny all of my truths. 🌭Sit and spin. I own you

@@Hobbes746you haven’t explained anything other then your fixation with sitting and spinning on 🌭

@@elyjahstark7549 _" you obviously realized that I vacuumed you all the knowledge."_ I realised you need a psychiatrist. No bad feelings, just a friendly advise.

Agree.

Both of those are true, and easily verifiable.

@@Hobbes746they are both false. But we can now understand your deluded stupidity

Because the earth is super bright compared to dim stars, it's like trying to take a photo of a star next to the full moon while trying to see the details on it. the brightness of objects is measured by it's apparent magnitude where the smaller the number the brighter with every number getting brighter by 2.5 times the brightest star in the night sky for example is sirius at -1.4 in comparison earth as seen from the moon would be -17.5 that makes the earth from the moon 2,328,306x brighter than the brightest star in the night sky. The full moon as seen from earth at its brightest for example is -12.5 and it's still about 100x dimmer than the earth. It's fascinating to think about thank you for the wonderful question! and I'm sorry if I come off strange in text

Watch out now. The military income personalities profiles are about to attack. Hobbes, wren, sailor. Atwatt…

The horizon is a circle centered on you. At sea level, you’re looking at that circle almost edge-on, so only a small amount of curvature is visible. As you gain altitude, you’re looking at that circle from above, and more curvature is visible. As the video description says, this video shows two flights. On the second flight, the standard GoPro lens was replaced with a rectilinear lens, which does not distort the image. Earth’s curvature is still easily visible.

@@Hobbes746 There is NEVER any curvature visible ANYWHERE. Youll understand what youre seeing...one day...keep trying. You must let go of your 'education'...But I really dont care if you do or not.

@@elyjahstark7549 Is there an Indian guy in there somewhere?

@@ScortchedYFronts It’s easy to verify that I’m right. Take a photo of the horizon, include a known-straight line to compare the horizon to, then downscale the horizontal axis of the photo: the curve of the horizon shows up.

Cool story bro

NASA did not lose the knowledge they built running the Apollo program: all of that data is available in public archives. After Apollo, they progressed by developing the first reusable spacecraft, the Space Shuttle.

@@Hobbes746ahhh why are you so triggered? You and twattwaffle are so triggered that you are responding to everyone. 😂🤡

@@elyjahstark7549 So anyone “responding to everyone” is “triggered”? Look in the mirror, then.

@@Hobbes746I’m only responding to you and lambchop, while you are responding to everyone with the absolute worst exposed and debunked damage controle ever recorded. You are worse then the Chemtrail and vaccine bots.

There is not a single photograph of the flat earth. Globe confirmed 💯 🌎

That is incorrect. We have millions of photos of Earth from space.

@@Hobbes746again liking each others comments. You and twatter. It’s flat. Everyone knows it but you.

@@elyjahstark7549 Your “knowledge” is out of date by 2500 years.

@@Hobbes746I’m still waiting for you to prove this vacuum exists. Was Orec or Stanley Steamer around billions of years ago? 🤡🤡🤡👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

You have to apply for a permit with air traffic control. There’s probably safety regs for building and transporting model rockets too, but I’m not familiar with those.

@@Hobbes746no one cares what you say. Why are you so triggered?

@@elyjahstark7549 I’m the one answering questions, You are just shitposting.

@@Hobbes746prove the vacuum. Prove gravity. PROVE SOMETHING YA 🌭 smoker

Watch out, here come the military online personalities profiles to argue and send you condescending replies. 😉

FAT. The Earth is FAT

@@elyjahstark7549 Then I need to arrange an eye exam for them.

2500 years of experimentation and observation conclusively proves Earth is spherical, not flat.

@@Hobbes746what technology was used?

No it's not a dumb question! The reason why rockets with fins stay straight in the air is because there is lots of air flowing over them keeping them pointed straight but as the air gets thinner the higher up the rocket goes it starts toppling over itself but its momentum keeps it going up as gravity and and very small amount of leftover air resistance chips away at its leftover speed until it hits its 'apogee' at that point it stops having any speed going up and it starts to fall down!

Watch out, here come the military online personalities profiles to argue and send you condescending replies. 😉

L'orizzonte non ha curvatura ma è rettilineo e si alza sempre contemporaneamente qualsiasi sia l'altezza che raggiunge il razzo Le lenti sono veramente fisheye Grazie per averci dimostrato che la terra non è come ci hanno sempre voluto far credere con la scuola obbligatoria e con l'indottrinamento forzato

How to say you haven't watched the video without saying you haven't watched the video. No fish used. Globe confirmed 💯 🌎

@@awatt how to say, atwatt is triggered. “Atwatt is triggered”

@@elyjahstark7549 awatt over there has such love for balls he can not grow any too face the truth.

Get in a plane going Mach speeds, and all you feel is the _changes_ in speed and direction. You cannot tell the difference between moving at a constant speed, or sitting still. Your failure as always.

In Concorde flying at Mach 2 my champagne didn't even move in the glass, until I drank it, of course.

@@karhukivi try standing up on a jet without using any assist, and yes, your glass of champagne shows movement. Thanks. Liars will always be liars.

@@karhukivi also, the earth is apparently traveling 60000 mph along with the sun through space. That’s over 55000 times the speed of your ridiculous example. Haha. You clown. Globe failed.

@@karhukivi sit on top of a car going 45 mph, throw a ball up in the air…What happens, on a clear non windy day. Boom you just got owned.

It is in fact slightly "fisheyed" but its obviously just exaggerating the curvature, not actually creating it

@@sussybaka8692uh, that’s a dumb comment

Comunque l'orizzonte non si abbassa mai E chissà perché

​@@lupodeilup Horizon lowers with altitude Globe confirmed 💯 🌎

@@awattnever lowered. Prove that

Why don’t we feel the spinning, and the 60000 miles an hour passing through space? Yet you feel Mach speeds and the G’s. GLOBE IS DEAD.

Because it doesn't spin like a spun ball , it only rotates once a day.

@@maxpain3790 at 2000 mph, it also rusted around the sun 40000 mph and is darting through space at 60000 mph covering 600million miles a year. Yet your toupee hasn’t fallen off and the constellations and stars have never moved. Globe fail. Flat validation

Rusting around the sun, darting through space, I don't know if the earth even does that.

@@maxpain3790 that’s the globe model. Look it up. Now you know why the world is calling Bull 💩 and all of these videos are being called out as garbage. Fish eyed lens, zero curvature, the ball is dead. All that spinning and twirling and pushing through space in the ever expanding universe, yet the horoscope constellations have never changed and the stars are in the exact same spot they have always been. The globe is factually dead.

Flat earther in Russia too?

@@rhqqn446fjnnbbc of course) the earth is flat anywhere)

you need to get to a far higher altitude to see Earth’s oblateness. From geostationary orbit, we can see the whole planet. In high-resolution photos, we can measure the difference between the polar and equatorial diameter. This difference is only 0.3%: too small to see with the naked eye, but easily measurable.

@@Hobbes746Maybe , but we need to be honest with ourselves, no one saw the curvature, but believe it is exist, cause someone told us so in the middle school. Try not lie to yourself and prove facts by youself, world is a big one freaking lie. Truth is always interesting and frightening. People lie, always. I find truth and can't believe in lie once again. Truth - no curvature, water always flat at the surface,no matter what container it fills, its the law of nature, phisical fact, no one can abort this. 80% of planet - water. 80% of planet flat?🤔 thats why they try to curve water in any picture of Earth from upper view, because you can't proof it by youself, but on the surface you can't see curvature at any direction. Thats why I feel confused seeing absolute round pictures of our planet from far distance.🌍 But from your eyes you see🏞️🏝️🌅 all flat. Wonderland!))

@@Hobbes746no one saw any curvature. You are getting cooked

Nope. There’s an end: the horizon. And that can only happen if Earth is a sphere.

Looks EXACTLY like a sphere Globe confirmed 💯 🌎

@@awattno. Actually it doesn’t

Nope. We have proven o ver and over again for the past 2500 years that Earth is a sphere. Everything, from simple measurements of Earth’s surface, to observation of a ship going over the horizon, to observation of Earth from space proves Earth is spherical, not flat. You are quoting poetry and claiming it’s a physics textbook.

The scientific theory that explains why Earth is a sphere, and why we stay attached to the outside of that sphere is called gravity. We have known for centuries that all objects that have mass also have gravity. This force pulled Earth into a sphere: this is the lowest energy state. Earth’s rotation produces an outward force that is only 1/300 as strong as gravity, even at the equator. This is measurable: objects weigh 0.3% less at the equator than the same object does at the poles.

That experiment is impossible, because the earth's gravity will pull the water off the ball and to the ground. Also, why would you spin it, when the earth makes one measly rotation in a 24 hour period? I wouldn't call that spinning, that's as slow as can be. You have no idea what firmament means. It means the universe, the heavens, the sky, but never a flat earth with a dome. That verse perfectly reflects Wernher von Braun. A man of God, who spent his life's passion and work, building spacecraft and rockets to explore the universe.

@@Hobbes746you haven’t proven anything. Submerge the ball in water. What happens? Water finds its level. Gravity has never been proven, can’t be calculated, or measured. Man keep gobbling that🌭. Stuff it right in your face

@@randyschissler5791measly rotations at 2000 mph, while rotating around the sun at 40000 mph and pushing through space at 60000 mph. No one feels that, but you sure do feel less speeds at Mach 1. You ladyboi, are exposed as a liar

Its better they didnt. It would enable more flat earth trolling. They'd say it's CG, or, it's obviously been manipulated to hide x.

@@MYOWNBSCHANNELflat earth trolling, or just exposing the globe earth lies. Hey, gobble my friends 🌭

We’re looking at daylit Earth, so the exposure time of the camera is far too short to see stars. Basic photography.

@@Hobbes746 no. Its basic pseudo science. Nice try. If you keep on believing this rubbish you'll come back as a cat.

@@Ackbar_its_a_trap Tonight, go out. Take photos of the sky with an exposure time of 1/1000 second, and count the stars in your photo. You will find none. You need an exposure time of more than one second (i.e. a thousand times longer) to take a photo that shows stars. THIS is science: an experiment that will show who is correct, which can be verified by anyone.

When was the last time you saw a star in the middle of a sunny day?

@@Bnslamb sometimes you can see them in the day, through the moon. More importantly why have you made 100's on comments on this video. Good luck when you come back to your beloved planet earth as a cat.

Right, he should have used yards.

@@Bnslamb lol you again. Good luck to you. The light at the end of the tunnel isn't heaven.

@@Ackbar_its_a_trap _"The light at the end of the tunnel isn't heaven."_ Right, that's just the surface. I drive in tunnels almost every day.

@@Bnslambwhat about naval binoculars used to visually spot enemies? I guess they can just visually look around the curve? Haha! You LOONATIC

Yup. 100%. Watch out, here come all of the military Globetard personality profiles. Like keyboard warriors

Nope. The GoFast rocket didn’t “stop suddenly”. When the upward speed dropped to near zero, the rocket (which was spinning rapidly) fired a yoyo despin mechanism that stopped the spin. The rocket then came back down under a parachute, and was recovered intact, with no damage. If it had run into anything, there’d be damage. We can see satellites with the naked eye, and we can measure their speed and altitude. Those satellites are far higher than 72 miles, and we had no problem putting them there.

That is incorrect. Earth’s surface is curved. A simple geodetic survey is all we need to prove this. Daugirdas’ rocket didn’t touch any “dome”: it came back down intact, with no impact damage. Satellites in orbit prove there is no dome: they operate at altitudes far higher than where the dome is claimed to be. There’s nothing above us except our atmosphere, and space.

If it were flat, you wouldn’t see a horizon (the edge of the visible part of the sphere).

@@Hobbes746no sphere here. Why so triggered

@@elyjahstark7549 Still empty, baseless denial, I see.

The second launch didn’t use a fisheye lens.

@@Hobbes746yes it uses a fish eyed lens. Why are you so triggered?

@@elyjahstark7549 Why do you keep repeating nonsense?

No. You wouldn’t.

@@elyjahstark7549 With a Nikon P1000 undoubtedly if the sky would be clear

@@BRACIAKSERO with a telescope maybe…I can agree. But with a fish eyed lens? Nah.

the standard process is to apply for a permit with air traffic control, so they can close the airspace for the launch. That process doesn’t mention informing other countries.

He has a post on the Rocketry Forum that has lots of detail incl the electronics he used.

@@Hobbes746 Thanks !