I thought you were going to compare features of the programs, not their sliders. Sorry, bro, this video is quite pointless.

Thanks for doing the testing with the more affordable 12-45mm which is IPX1 and it seems unphased by that snow burial which is encouraging.

If you had focus stacked more than just two frames would you have risked blur with the leaves or branches moving? I feel like I always get blur with anything that moves when I focus stack with multiple images. Great, fast little tutorial! Thank you.

Great video and I must admit that these tips relate not only to photography but to any other niche in which you want to operate :)

Great points.

I would ban photo editing, completely. If you want to be a good photographer, just use the bloody camera and lens features. Nothing less, nothing more

Join the Landscape Photography University Community: www.landscapephotographyuniversity.com/offers/L5RsFg3B/checkout

Great tip, especially for vertical shooters. Thanks for that.

Hi there, nice to see the camera work after covered with the snow. I am looking for a lightweight and compact camera to use on high altitude expeditions in the Himalayas and I am expecting to get good quality photos of other mountains from the top of the summit. which would be a great? I'll be very grateful if you guide me. Thank you.

Not gonna mention who inspired this video 😭😢

I think that Luminar is easier to learn and work with, but at the end Lightroom is far away. If you learn more of how things work in Lr, you do more specific and clear work. However it needs a lot of time to learn how Lightroom, photography editing and colours editing works. So at the end, Lightroom here is better, if you want to be better in final and consistent editor. Maybe also if you want to do better photos with your camera. More Ai futures is at the start point in profi editind really bad idea, for me, with full respect to others. But, if you don’t have time and you are hobby person, I really like how Luminar works with this point of view.

I shoot at iso 1600 max cuz my camera is made for daytime, it gets good imahes at higher iso, but 1600 is sweet spot for night

You can also lessen the zoom and put distance between the camara and the point of focus to apply more depth of field! Fantastic content man, can't wait to see more of this!

I like your video, but everything has limits. Adding a good photo to the software improves it. Bad-terrible photos really cant be improved.

So as I can see zve is for those who wanna make talking head videos of themselves and use it indoors as a streaming cam and all other people who wanna be more into photography and videography should be start off with a6400. I think I’ll go with a6400 myself or maybe put a bit more money and get 6700. Zve is $800 new with kit lens 16-50, a6400 is $920 like new condition on Amazon with 18-135 lens. The only reason I even consider zve is usb-c cuz it’s easier as I have all my electronics use it

Good tip for hand hold

Hey man, keep up the good work, when i saw this a genuinely thought this was a multi million sub channel. Just subbed!

I thought f8 was the sweet spot for most of the lens and there will be diffraction after f12

Luminar Neo, buy once cry once > LR subscription based. Plus, Adobe spys on you

Topaz is a waste of money. So far best ai i ever used is remni it will use ai to feel in soft pictures.

Or just rotate it in post

Join the Landscape Photography University Community: www.landscapephotographyuniversity.com/offers/L5RsFg3B/checkout

Great tip man, always always use a grid

I'd say leaving the lens cap on would be one of the biggest mistakes one can make. But I guess everyone has their priority's elsewhere.

So true, thanks for reminding me

but most of the time you dont have a clear horizon line to line up

A leveling base is what you need. Level every single time

Whats a good camers for under £500?

I have a question. Can taking photo using low shutter speed ( like 30 secs ) in a bright room harm my camera?

The fact that we actually say "I'm not a flat earther" unironically in the 21st century is beyond crazy.

If all the trees are angled the same way it can be okay to level the photo instead, sometimes making the scene more interesting

Love the "I'm not a flearther" moment. 😂 Your advice is always really useful, cheers bud.

Almost every cam exposures r auto...that's how!! The camera figures it out... do better!!

Ah. It's not bad light, it's an opportunity to advance your photography skills.

Good to know

'Better light' and 'worse light'

Yes fantastic advice! Going against the grain as there is so much poor advice out there and this is greats advice ! ❤

Not too bad for a rookie photographer like yourself mate

Go Vols!

Use filters.

yes! great advice. I think of golden hour as "easy light" rather than "good light". It's hard to go wrong but hard light and high contrast can make the right shot really stand out from the crowded sea of landscape photos.

Good video 👍

Another good reason to leave yourself some wiggle room is printing. If you're taking photos in a 4:3 aspect ratio but then you want to make an 8x10 print, you're going to need to crop. If you composed the photo exactly how you want it in camera you won't be able to get that composition in the print and something will have to be sacrificed

Superb well said Ty

That's really smart tbh

Hell ya this is my system and I love it!

On canon, hit the INFO button

GRRRR

GRRRR