If it's digital and it's online, it's probably being used to train an AI somewhere.

Yes, Llama is open source and was the LLM used to develop Nemotron. It literally says Llama-3.1 at the top of the NVIDIA site.

Musk literally suppresses voices on Twitter that are critical of him or make fun of him. platformwww.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/jan/15/elon-musk-hypocrite-free-speech

Given that AI ironically isn't intelligent, I'd agree.

@@JamieBykovBrett I would define 'intelligence' as the ability to get a specific task accomplished. That would apply to humans and non-humans.

@@nameless-yd6ko Would you consider a calculator intelligent?

@@JamieBykovBrett Can a calculator complete a task? If by 'calculator', you mean 'programmed robot' that can complete a task, then yes. Just like a person. Under this definition, a Roomba would be intelligent. If by 'calculator' you mean something that just sits on a table until YOU take it in hand and..., then, probably not. Then it would simply be a tool for an allegedly intelligent person. ;)

@@nameless-yd6ko Do you see Generative AI's working without human prompts and inputs? 😉 I think the definition of intelligent is ill defined but it's problematic when we apply it to machines. Current AI systems are simply supped up predictive text.

And yet, at least you know it's real and not AI generated. 😉

Although windows has extensive records, it is a whole different capability when everything you do it captured and run through an AI.

Some see problems, others solutions.

As always, we all have options of OS's.

I mean that ones been a problem for as long as I've been in employment!

AI, I’ve never even heard of her!

It is such an inaccessible application... but... it's free!

It's easier than you think! If you can send an email you have the ability to use AI. It just takes refinement of prompts. Platforms like Make.com which this is built on have free options and they are no code solutions. With a bit of time, you'd be able to create something like this. The learning curve isn't massive and no high spec PC is required. It's so cheap to run these things, it's basically free.

Of-course: fathom.partnerlinks.io/nw9rsmp261ni

Good question. I think it is really difficult to say that any career is 'future proof'. I don't think it will exist in the same way it does now, but extracting meaningful insights from data for business is a career that is primed for AI assistance. However, there will be a human component to the career. I believe the future should not deter anyone from pursuing the things they find meaningful, as these aspects will adapt and change to fit the era they exist in. For data science, I would definitely recommend gaining a foundational understanding of AI and how to leverage those tools. Even if your job is not taken by AI, it will be taken by someone who knows how to use AI.

@JamieBykovBrett So in this instance, it will be more useful to build around ai and learning it

The real money is where you find the intersection between two diverse fields. If you learn how AI can enhance the role of a data scientist/analyst, then you've got a step up on people who have been in the field for years but might not understand the advancements in technology. Essentially, why not learn both? Using generative AI will become an essential digital skill; not having it will be the equivalent of going for a job interview today and saying you don't know how to search the web or send an email. You don't need to have studied AI to leverage generative AI for practical uses, and you don't have to understand it in great detail to use it, in the same way you don't have to have studied IT to use the internet.

Thank you for your interesting comment and positive feedback. It is appreciated. I hear you, the way tech has advanced at such a rate means that the thinking behind wielding god-like technology happens faster than we are able to legislate for. But what's the purpose behind these advancements has to have a net-gain from humanity. My concern is as the power of digital increases, the potential it has to further marginalise the most vulnerable increases dramatically.

There is a lack of quality of thought and this can become magnified by AI as it reflects the data it's trained on.

We've converted the output of human life into %'s 1's and £'s instead of remembering that the purpose of creating those measurements was to discern impact of the quality of that life. The human-output is often seen as more important than the human-cost which is often missing from these equations.

There is only so much it can do and to be honest, it’s the authenticity people tend to latch on to more. I think in a world starved of connection and mistrust, we need human connection to help us part with our hard earned cash. Particularly true for the service I offer anyway.

@@JamieBykovBrett what service do you provide?

@@nolan1537 I'm a human-centric innovator, so I support a lot with AI and automation as well as training and education. The problem is that people are so saturated when it comes to marketing and sales that they are almost blind to it. You have to do something that captures peoples attention and often that means being very personalised. There are follow up methods where I do use AI and automation, unfortunately, from me experience is AI doesn't quite land sales... yet...

Promoting good social and economic practices in an era of AI! 😅

Goldman Sach's research says Generative AI could raise global GDP by 7% & lift productivity growth by 1.5 percentage points over a 10-year period. Two thirds of occupations could be partially automated by AI the equivalent of 300 million full-time jobs to automation. When I say machines and AI I am highlighting digital advancements. When I consult for organizations, even at this point in time I ask them 3 questions, is it at the level of an intern to do, is it repetitive and does it involve text. If the answer to any one of those is yes, then the chances are there is a suitable AI solution that we can utilize or create. Personally, I automate 20 business processes, which collectively complete around 2000 tasks per month, if each tasks takes me 2 minutes that means approximately if saves me about 1.6 weeks every month. That's not in the future, that's the here and now. Please do share any data that you are utilizing to shape your evaluation of AI and I'll give it a read.

​​@@JamieBykovBrettyou're referring to an AI era, but AI isn't at a point where it is sentient/can make decisions for itself because it is a generative text prediction model. Machines can be programmed to fulfill tasks, as has been happening for years, but everything in the end has to be set up by a human. Utilising AI in the way that you're suggesting wouldn't work and therefore wouldn't be profitable, so big companies will revert to humans in wage slavery. We'd need massive social reforms for any of this to be true, or possible. Also, if we do decide that jobs that can be facilitated by text generation models will be fulfilled by them, humans will be put out of so many jobs that we would enter yet another recession.

@@thecrabmaestro564 So, I think there's a bit of clarity required around the term "AI Era." AI, in this context, refers to the capability of machines, both digitally and physically, to perform tasks that would have previously required humans. The AI era, from this perspective, does not signify the point of singularity where AI is as intelligent or more intelligent than human beings. There is a lot of debate about whether AI can ever truly be sentient, as sentience and consciousness themselves are concepts we have difficulty defining. Historically, when "AI" reaches a certain level of capability, we stop referring to it as AI. I'd argue that "AI" is the wrong term anyway, as there is nothing inherently intelligent about "AI." However, if you look at my other content (particularly on inclusive AI), you'll see that what I advocate for is that with our growing technical capabilities, we must advance our political, economic, and social models to accommodate these developments. I agree that we can't maintain the same economic models with AI underpinning our society. However, I do believe AI will underpin our society, changing how we participate in the world, necessitating advancements in our economic models to accommodate this changing participation. This is similar to how, from the agricultural revolution to the industrial revolution, we went from 80% of all jobs being agriculturally based to less than 20% 60 years later. Technology drives change, but technology that doesn't consider the holistic impact of its introduction risks causing economic catastrophes. It's worth noting that even today, 92% of stock trades are conducted by AI systems. I appreciate your thoughts and agree with many of them, I hope that comes across from the depth of my reply.

​@@JamieBykovBrettNice

@@TheFallenStrider Thanks so much! :)

Heyya buddy! You can go to this link - chat.openai.com/g/g-wFlWqztJA-linguo If you have Chat GPT Plus then it'll appear in your GPT's

Thanks so much! I'm glad it resonated with you. :)

Yes! You should be able to import these into MyWebAR if you can export them as standard 3D file types.

Thank you for your insightful comment and for being so open to sharing your experiences. As a child, comprehending that sensitivity can be quite challenging, especially when compared with fellow, often predominantly (but not exclusively) male peers. Overcoming the feeling of being overwhelmed takes a significant amount of time, more so when societal norms seem to suggest that such emotions are unexpected or 'normal'. When I see that trait in boys growing up now, I always just hope that they somehow manage to hold on to it.

I'm glad! It definitely makes an impression.

Heyya! Great question and thanks for asking. I've put together a video previously that I think answers my vision of how we redevelop our economic models to account for our technological capabilities. - kzbin.info/www/bejne/bWameXuCj92Aq5Y

And now you don't necessarily need coding skills to produce code, as long as you can describe in natural language your intentions, you can get an AI to do it. I agree, regulation always comes in when someone feels it's at risk to them, up until then they downplay the impact. It's a sad state of play.

Thanks so much for your comment. :)

I'm not an artist, I don't think at any point I mention artists or imply that artist think like that. I said AI has potential uses for the average person who can benefit from this inception of AI art. Artists are no more or less under-threat by AI implementation than any other job, ranging from customer service to the most established coder.

I passionately reject the notion that AI makes us less intelligent. Our progress as a civilisation is rooted in our ability to draw upon the collective knowledge and experience of those who have come before us; we stand on the shoulders of giants. The issue with current education systems is that they primarily focus on providing students with industrial education for a digital workforce, rather than teaching them how to effectively utilise technology to succeed in the digital economy. As the late Ken Robinson stated, "Human communities depend upon a diversity of talent, not a single conception of ability. At the heart of the challenge is to reconstitute our sense of ability and of intelligence." Let's also not forget that education had always been inequitable, with a significant difference in the access to and use of technology. My vision is that we should aspire to build a society that accommodates individuals regardless of their ability or level of participation and that respects individuals' autonomy to the extent that which the decisions of others have minimal impact on our lives and freedoms. This would result in a more resilient society, which can easily accommodate the vast range of lived experiences, neuro-abilities, and bodily-abilities, and reduce marginalisation. This is achievable through AI technology and automation, to the extent that which it can provide a basic standard of living regardless of participation. Surely, that was the aim of technology, to begin with, to reduce cost and labour while enabling us to have greater freedom and autonomy over our time. Conversely, my experience is that, when people are asked what they would do if money wasn't a consideration, most people have aspirations for projects and pursuits that promote social good, for the benefit of communities and work on self-betterment. It is crucial that we evolve our mindset and socio-economic models alongside technological advancements as we transition into the digital revolution. I hope that's a useful perspective. :)

@@JamieBykovBrett It is, yes, but the unfortunate reality is that human greed will always exist, and so inequity will as well. Science always evolves faster than human morals and wisdom. Instead of investing in programs that further science, I am of the opinion that we are going too fast to know how the development of science will effect society as a whole. A utopian solution never works when the society developing that solution is fundamentally flawed.

Well, this just became my most favourite comment ever!

That's incredibly kind of you. Thanks so much.

I think there's aspects of that comment which are true, but Ai is able to come up with original responses within the confines of it's programming. Ai art is a perfect example, each piece is an original generation. However, Ai-Da said it themselves in when addressing the House of Lords, Ai art is made without consciousness and that's true for an Ai response.

It's well worth going in their and 40 minutes will flyby!

+Larry WanCanary Pretty much, a few speech recognition macros for specific commands and badabingbadaboom.