Oh, buddy, You underestimate how intelligent crocodilians are.

Frost puppy

Hunter gathers who followed the herds...

Its still a wolf you people stupid.. just like everything else man "discovers" changes so we are stupid

Humans did and will eat pretty much anything. Like, we are complete omnivores and have one of the broadest diets in the animal kingdom which is how we managed to spread to practically every landmass and environment on earth

This isn't news! We've known about the 80-20 ratio for decades by studying the diets of existing hunter- gatherer people like the Kalahari Bush tribes.

I was thinking because early humans got cold and lost body hair.

Well that's in Peru. I'm sure it changed based on what food is most readily available.

Regardless of the results of the DNA tests, I can't say Gatherer-Hunter. It has nothing to do with historical accuracy, it has 100% to do with how awkward it is to say it like that. I just can't wrap my tongue around it.

My toilet can taste!

I'm surprised not much "Camp Rock" jokes are in the comments 😂😅

IMO this study is lacking. Being in South America they had vastly more edible vegetation than the New World.

I wonder. Has there been a study like this of Eskimos and Inuits?

The reality is: it depends on location. In the Arctic, the Inuit basically don't eat plants at all (apart from occasional berries in the summer). In other parts of the world, meat was always a special-occasion food, until industrialisation ~50 years ago commodified it. Different ethnic groups have different genetic and metabolic adaptations for different diets.

Sustained by the grandmothers cooking the tubers and watching the kids while the mothers and fathers went out gathering and hunting,

Why is there nothing in focus?

Ya better bring a man.😂

Pangaea is Jambudeep means Biggest Island 🏝️ of the Earth 🌍 already mentioned in Indian old holly book that's reasons we called whole Earth is one family

Honestly, it makes a lot of sense given the sheer variety of plants we are able to consume, some with substantial processing. That big brain of ours and fire didn’t just make eating animals easier. It massively expanded the variety of plants that were accessible to us. It allowed us to know which plants we could eat and when, how, to eat them safely and gain more benefits from doing so. Plants are also easier to predict and control the risk of acquiring. And pre agriculture, our persistence hunting probably synergized well with gathering over a very large range prior to traditional agriculture. covering a lot of ground, probably allowed us to gather a lot of calories. It’s also possible that forging over a large area increased our likelihood of running into potential prey. Keep in mind that our modern understanding of agriculture probably differs massively from how early humans deliberately cultivated plants. There’s a decent amount of evidence through existing or receipt traditions that some amount of agriculture likely resembled something more like stewardship and manipulation of a large geographic area rather than the stationary model, we are used to in a lot of the world.

Hunter-gatherers just has a better bounce to it

You got the DNA...clone em!

Imagine a whole group of people being mad at you for digging in the dirt and finding things.

I am not a healthy meal, guys

Potato on the weekdays, vicuna on weekends(if we catch one, else potatoes)

Where do Denosovans fit with Neanderthal and Homosapiens?

Why are so many pointing out "Well, it would have depended on the region" like it's some kind of gotcha? He wasn't trying to claim that all prehistoric people ate primarily plants. He was pointing out one specific counterexample to the commonly held misconception that prehistoric people in general ate primarily meat.

True but did they have vapes that you can play Tetris on didn’t think so homosapiens🔛🔝

I don't think that in the Andes it was so easy to hunt vicuñas and guanacos as it was for the Asian peoples to hunt in their gentler mountain ranges.

It is entirely unsatisfying not to see the actual pits, with some remains still in the pit. And at the least you could show us pictures of the animal bones….

Peru does not represent all early paleo people.

Nice face

What’s the source on that moss claim? All I’ve ever heard or read is that it’s crappy low-calorie food that’s a waste of effort unless you’re just using it to stretch some more nutritious dish. But the same is true of celery…

If humans evolved from monkeys why do we still see monkeys ??

44:45 sounds like a heavy metal song

ถามพระเจ้าครับ เพราะ......พระเจ้าสร้างโลก😊

"THE HERBAVORES ALWAYS ATE WELL 'CAUSE THEIR FOOD DIDNT EVER RUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUN"

scandalous

I can't wait to die and be judged on my eating habits in 1000+ years...

That is not an elk sir

Ask Genghis Kahn if he ate salad 😁

First, it's "we don't know". Then it's repetitively "pretty much right" that the water pretty much left.

Peru isn't the entire population and is close to equator where vegetables are more prevalent. You adapt to your locale. Basically a polar bear would have an issue eating as much green as a grizzly let alone a panda

Most likely scavengers

There was some native telling me that variation must have been very high, because in some places there was almost no vegetation, such as in deserts hot and cold, but large animals could eat stuff and be eaten... or eat fish... anyway, I'm sure it's a mix... Eskimos don't subsist on vegetables, but blubber, for instance... So... i mean, we already knew, like as fact, lots of peoples already ate mostly animal... so, evidence that someone was eating mostly vegetables doesn't challenge that view. Oh, and another clue is from vegans who note how small areas are that exist that a vegan could healthily subsist without animal nutrition.

Humans causing climate change for millions of years.

I mean pulling a potato out of the ground is much less likely to cost me an arm if I mess up and the success chance of getting the food is much higher