The best test is just look for spelling, grammatical, or other technical mistakes. Every ChatGPT model has perfect spelling and grammar. It’s incapable of incorrect spelling grammar. Sure, a human can add mistakes in later, but look at the differential: are the mistakes too obvious or are they reasonable?

"the rest of you are trash" that didn't sound like he was talking about the papers lmao, learn to take criticism honey 😂

The Loomis one was amazing 😂❤ he seems like a great guy

Gustafson’s personality grew on me after a while

The engineering professor seemed like a good professor tbh.

1:39 Ironically having grammatical errors is more of a sign of it being human than machine. ChatGPT is way less likely to have simple grammar or spelling mistakes.

As a student I can tell when my fellow students are using ChatGPT better than my professors can. Ive been in group projects where I know without asking that certain members in the project are using ChatGPT for their portion just by reading it and come prepared to defend myself and my part of the project against any allegations but the professor ends up totally oblivious

Plagiarism is a no-no regardless of where the material came from. HOWEVER, using AI as a proof-reader is an excellent use of technology! Also, AI can be an excellent aide in research because it can access humungous amounts of literature and journals in blistering speed which makes identifying, and often accessing, the most useful references very quickly. AI's ability to summarise large amounts of text is again a useful tool, as well as its ability to locate the source of a known quote, to to explain professional vocabulary and/or methods and principles. Unlike a real-life tutor it never tires of re-explaining when one is trying hard to 'get something' that one's neurons are just not finding intuitive! ;-D

I know that first anthropology professor regrets agreeing to this 😂

the chem department energy is top tier

Loomis is the best

Bro the chemistry professors are sooo funny. It’s so funny watching how the subject these people teach have an impact on their personality. Each one of them is exactly what I’d imagine they’d be.

Ok got it, so the anthropology professors were dismissive and had attitude whereas the chem professors were understanding and self-aware of what caused them to not perform as well. That also shows how much better of teachers they are, as the anthropology professors didn't attribute bad performance to something personal, meaning that it was not an one-time thing but their behaviour was chronically problematic..

1:12 to all teachers, especially chem profs, as I am also studying chem engineering, pleasee just beacuse you have to spend 45 mins on a single thing, don't use the whole 45 mins to explain it. If you can simply explain it in 2, use those 2 minutes and then help us understand with examples, instead of unnecessary and confusing content 😅. That is why I spend a day trying to understand a simple thing and as soon as I watch a 2 minute random youtube video, it all makes sense.

The chemistry professors seem really nice. (Are they called that? Idk, it's 2 am)

I worked at the Va for 15 years and saw 1000's wear caps and shirts that proudly claim they were PROUD Vietnam veterans. I have never seen one of these activist wear a cap that says they were a proud antiwar veteran . Afterall, these student had deferments that meant someone else had to take there place in the draft and in the front lines of Vietnam. They also helped S Vietnam loose a war that resulted in millions suffer starvation, persecution and 100,000 risked drowning on dangerous voyages to reach the US. Thanks SDS and WULF

hey, this is quality work, thanks for posting!

You have to remember that Im sure their reactions were played up due to the camera. The guy who crumpled it up and chucked it was probably trying to be funny, but it backfired Theres nothing justifying their disregard for the critiques though

Is it just me or from the first little bit of each of these teachers speaking and their appearance I could tell you everything those reviews said.

I use it all the time but even just for school Future is here grandpa deal with it

they can monitor network activity during students doing "work" to see if gpt was visited and then erect fake products like zerogpt that "detects" gen ai aided submissions - poor schools doing this out of deep passion for academic integrity reduces the scummy ness of fabricating gen ai detectors. but if rich schools fabricate zero gpt to uphold a sophisticated academic front while behind the scenes just getting the it department to wire tap tcp packets now thats a lemon tree that needs insuring.

Is this a reference to Lasagna cat?

would've been better if ALL the papers were AI and you didn't tell them until the very end

Respect to the ones who accept some blame

That first anthro teacher's such an ick, had be cringing the whole way 😭😭

"Also he's a hottie" "Who is this...? Too bad it doesn't have their name on here" LMAO

The sallow balding unattractive anthropologist had a truly shocking number of people attracted to him

Very cool and funny video. WashU is so cool

The chem professors seem great!

What I do to bypass all AI detectors. First, use all AI tools to brainstorm ideas to make a solid outline (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, googleaistudio…). Then I ask each of these tools to write each part of the essay. Read all of them then combine in a pdf. Now input that very same pdf in all those tools again. With a well- written prompt, now all those AI will point out whether or not your paper is likely written by AI and how to make it naturally written again. Now read through all versions to take out the best part from each.

I talked to a lot of my high school teachers. They all knew who used Cheat-GPT, but they didn't have proof, and they couldn't force the student to prove it wasn't AI. It was infuriating to everyone, and I just couldn't understand why the district couldn't just give more power to the teachers on this.

I tried to rate a shitty professor I had like 4x but for some reason it never got posted. I didn't even use any mean words, and I was being genuine. It was a 7:00 AM class and she would immediately force us to play jeopardy every single class period. No lecture, no activities outside of jeopardy. I hated it. She also would mix up the meanings of textbook vocab words while speaking.. which lady, isn't this your bread and butter?

Bret getting so many flirty reviews says a lot

I am a TA. I can usually tell if a student submitted Ai generated work, but school policy requires concrete proof. So unless we can prove that it was copied from somewhere, we have to let it pass.

He really is a tool.

I LOVE CHATGPT, LOVE IT!!!!!!!

The funniest review of a professor that I have ever seen is someone who said "I changed my entire major to avoid ever dealing with him again." Like. You couldn't have dropped the class and taken it with someone else? You had to change your entire major? Really? 🤣

Rate My Professor is so unhelpful because the only people who leave reviews are the ones who either loved the professor or hated them. The vast majority of people who took their classes might have been like "meh they're fine" but never wrote any reviews. Then the 5 people who loved or hated them write reviews and make it look like they're either amazing or terrible when the reality is that they're really neither 😅

ChatGPT is an awesome tool for summarizing topics and can be used as a starting point. But that's about where it ends and where it SHOULD end for a student. You need a large academic article summarized into like a few paragraphs to see if it's worth reading in full? ChatGPT might be good. It DOES have use cases in Academia and it is up to academia to evolve. Not completely sure how but a good way to do that may be for faculty to stop using canned and re-using the same exact prompts every single semester (maybe changing 1 or 2 words). Or maybe going away from multiple choice exams (because they're easy to grade) and adding in more short-form essays into exams so students get a mixture of multiple choice and the ability to explain AND summarize the content quickly - a VERY useful tool after college. But that involves work that a lot of faculty is not willing to put in - either because they are complacent in their jobs due to tenure, not being paid enough due to being adjunct (that is it's own can of worms issue in of itself) or just plain lazy. To me this whole "ChatGPT is causing major issues in Academia" sounds exactly like "Computers are going to take all our jobs" except that the industry evolved and continues to evolve...and Academia is stuck in the same way of thinking, especially at the PhD level, as it has been for 100+ years.

I'm a professor of psychology and I can tell you it is very easy to discern the Chat GPT papers from the true student papers.

But yo8d never just ctrl+c, ctrrl+v an entire answer to a prompt onto the assignment thats idiotic. I mean yeah you would at the start but then review it, tweak it, read it through test it egc. You just use gpt for the annoying raw material that you then tweak accordingly. Ofc you might not get everything but its not that hard to get the „AI“ out of the sentences with a few tweaks. Maybe even go for weaker expressions just try your best to turn it into something readable.

I’m on the edge of if Bret is playing into it or not but some people are getting upset at Strait too, Strait is 100 percent in the right bro, what the fuck do you mean you needed help printing as a college student in 2022, do you need help wiping your ass too?

Loomis does know how to relate to students. 😅

This was an awesome video 😊 Keep up the great work!!!

“He is very big… get over it and go to his office hours”. THIS. IM WHEEZING LOLLLL

The anthropology professor is definitely oneof the professors my anatomy teacher had. he goes on and on about how college professors will be not nice to you, won't bother to be your friend in any way, no late work (beyond a certain point), no tests retakes, strict very strict guidelines for his class (it's a challenging class I don't blame him), how this and that won't fly in college, if you ask to go to the bathroom before the bells rings but you make it back after the bell rings you're still late. Which is probably one of his most unfair rules since college professors don't care when you go the bathroom and you don't need to ask. Even for him in his peak primal days of 1890's eduction I'm sure they let him. He also HATES when students are late but the ones who are late do not care. I'd like to come back to his class after experiencing college specifically the one he went to (he reps it all the time) and see if what he says stands. Albeit I took anatomy because I was intertested in it not because I wanted to pursue a career in the medical field though, so the classes will not be the same but he's teaching class of 2025 and 2026 who will get professors half his age.

who would have thought the chem professors would be the most fun & lighthearted. <3

So I'm buying Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil :)

“Oh wait, that was a good one - I’m keeping those. The rest of you are trash.”

I found it interesting that the professor noted that ChatGPT often uses a formulaic structure, such as starting the first sentence with a direct readout of the prompt (2:43). This is something to be aware of when using ChatGPT and other language models.