Thank you so much! 😁

@@ahappylife-ul8iv Thank you so much, I can work on that 😊

@@ReudiKnights I can't wait to hear it!

@@MrViewer...28皿 Thank you. Glad you enjoyed it 🙏

@@whussthadeal3798 I haven't read that. I'll have to check it out 😊 thank you for your comment 🙏

@@chaymaeajjaji707 It's taken a long time to get it all sounding right 😅 Thank you for listening, I'm very glad you enjoyed it 😊

@@ReudiKnights Absolutely AMAZING!!!! Perfect Music To Read By And Write 'Twilight Fanfiction' Many Thanks!!! ❤❤

@@gretcheniacorum9558 That's awesome! I'm glad you're enjoying it 😁

@@Erick-wd6lb Thank you 😁

This movie has a very magical feeling. I'm glad you enjoyed it 😊

You cannot have reality outside of reality. Nor can you have nothingness under reality. It's completely counterintuitive 😅

I address some of these aspects of reality in my video called "The Purple Fabric Analogy". Essentially, what reality IS, is nothingness. No thing at all. And since nothingness possesses absolutely zero of anything, then it cannot be itself, without appearing to be everything "else". Furthermore, since it possesses no characteristics or attributes of any kind, it possess no limitations upon itself to prevent itself from being everything. This means that, what reality IS, IS NOTHINGNESS, but nothingness HAS TO APPEAR TO BE, everything in reality. It's completely absurd, but true, nonetheless. This means that multiplicity, separation, division, etc, is an illusion of being that IS TRUE (even though being an illusion). This means that what a relationship IS, is pure reality (nothingness), and what that nothing is BEING, is a particular state in which "relationships of "separate beings" can appear to "be together"". But since this illusion is true, then this illusion should not be misinterpreted as invalidating relationships. In fact, it deepens the connection with "another", for they are you 🙏❤

I very much appreciate your comment, and I appreciate you taking the time to specify your points explicitly. The truth is, I arrived at an understanding of reality, not through reading books, watching videos, listening to teachers, or finding answers in anyone/anything else. I found answers, simply through looking. If it happens to sound alike hinduism and other various philosophies/philisophers, could it not be the case that it's because if you do look at reality, you will find truth, and that is something that anyone can do. The reason they sound alike, is because there's only so much one can do within the limitations of language, and only a finite amount of ways that one can word the same thing. Another way of looking at this, is: who was the first person to discover questioning reality? Did they learn that from someone else? And did that person learn it from someone before that, and so on? Could it not be possible that we don't need to be referring to other people's findings all the time, in order to find truth ourselves? Could it not be possible, that simply to experience reality (meaning experience all of it, including the depths of our minds), is fundamental to what we actually are? And could it be possible that multiple different people have arrived at simular truth, simply because it's not a belief, or an idea, but is true, but they all have different ways of articulating it? For example, some claims of truth happen to be extremely one sided, yet other claims of truth consider all sides. Could it not be possible that if anyone (not anyone special, or unique, but just anyone), could sit back, begin to question reality, and stumble across an absolute truth, that considers all possible truths, and is absolutely infinite, but sounds like someone else's finding of absolute truth, simply because it actually is absolutely true, and not because they're copying each other? In this instance, there would be no need for them to credit each other when sharing these insights with the world, as they did not come from anyone to credit, they just are true, beyond objectivity, subjectivity, perspective, belief, etc. I have read other books in the past, multiple books about philosophy, thinking, emotional work, self enquiry, but never found anything that was actually my direct experience, and if I would have shared that, then that would have been me sharing someone else's insights, but the point in which I found myself able to share something from me, was at the point I actually realised absolute truth, and I share what actually is my direct experience. As for naivety, that's a tough word to actually define. What exactly is it (in your definition) that defines the difference between naivety and experience? What would that look like to you? Once again, I invite this conversation, and thank you for your comment. I say all this with love 🙏

And thank you mentioning the piano collection! That means a lot 🥰

Fair play. The truth is, whatever you are looking for, is what you will find, since that will be the context in which you are asking questions, and answering them. So if you happen to find that questioning everything, has brought you to the conclusion that what you want is control in life, then by all means, either question that itself, or don't. There are no wrong answers. You will just ultimately find exactly what you are looking for. That's the purpose for this exercise, as a question states nothing at all, it just asks the questions. Thank you for your comment.

I appreciate your comment, and Varg is a cool guy man! 😅🤘

Very interesting way of interpreting my video. I welcome this of course. I thank you for your contribution, and I appreciate the context in which you are interpreting what you think I'm saying. Of course, please appreciate that everything you have specified ARE things I've made abundantly clear in previous videos (such as the absolute truth that CAN BE FOUND is absolute nothingness, all ways, not one particular way, and that any one particular way is always a relative truth based on context, and not the absolute truth). I completely understand everything you've said, and I see where you're coming from when it comes to giving credit to the OG teachers, and I will give credit to them when it comes to the topics I have learned from them, but as for the realisations I've not learned from anyone else, I'll just continue to share it from me. Last of all, I'm sorry that you've discovered that you can't learn anything without a teacher, and that absolute truth is something you can't, and never will know. Unfortunately, it happens to be the case that you can know absolute truth, it's just contextually different than the stand point in which you're currently interpreting my video and other curious teachings. Feel free to continue watching my videos, and I'll do my best to try and clear up some of the points you've raised in your comment (in later videos). If you don't return, then I wish you all the best in your search for truth 🙏

I'd also like to add that NOT blindly agreeing with me is a good thing. I welcome this, and I would not recommend any body to blindly believe anything that anyone says. I appreciate the points you made, and I've considered with thought, the points raised. Thank you, once again 🙏

Of course, not answering these questions will result in an open ended identity, and of course, depending on the context/reason you're asking questions, will depend on what kind of answers you will feel you need, and an open ended identify might not be the answer you are looking for (in a particular context). However, on contextually different level, answering none of these questions, and remaining in a state of questioning without requiring or looking for answers, can result in an answer that does not exist of language/articulation, but of a nature of pure knowing. Thank you for your comment. If there are any other questions you want to ask, please feel free to ask away! 😊🤘

Sounds awesome! 😁🤘

You can stop questioning whenever you like, or continue as long as you like. It really up to you 👌

Hi Sam, this is a very good question, and it's not necessarily that you're wrong, as included within infinity, is all the thing infinity is not (including unawareness), but what unawareness is, is actually something within awareness. So in other words, you are aware of what you are unaware of, meaning unawareness is still awareness, just a very vague, feint and abstract formation of it. I've actually been thinking about making another video concerning awareness, as there is just so much to cover. Once I do that, I hope to be able to clear up some of these questions 🙏😊

Thank you 🙏 I must appreciate your comment. If there are any particular topics you'd like me to cover, feel free to drop a comment and I'll cover it a next video 👍

Sam! Long time no speak 🥰 hope you are all good and well. I think about you sometimes, and still to this day, regard you as nothing less than a real one. It would be lovely to chat some time again, maybe discuss some philosophical matters. I'd love to hear your take on some things 🥰 peace and love brother 🙏

Ya thx man. And ya we can talk. btw u earned a new sub@@ReudiKnights

hey can we do a science-phylosophy colab?@@ReudiKnights

@@Sam_005 Absolutely yes!!! 😍

Subbed to your channel bro 🙏

Thank you so much 🥰

Thank you Zaki Habiib.

Thank you John Knights.