The Difference Between Relative Truth And Absolute Truth

Here is the difference 😊

[@dotmavriq]

I'll just comment on this because you seem like a good person. I think the reasons your videos are getting very very little traction is because of the naive nature with which you espouse your ideas. You come off as quite naive when you try to communicate your thoughts with as simple language as possible but with no reference to other thinkers or hell even a KZbin video you've watched... In this way you are demanding that someone listens to YOU and takes what you say seriously and then take it in and comprehend it with the same religious vigor you have of your own cosmological/existential beliefs. I sometimes hear Hegel (owl of minerva et. c.), I definitely hear Immanuel Kant, Hinduism as someone mentioned in one of your videos. This then gets smushed into some esoteric philological headache with semantics and goal-post-moving and also completely forgetting to finalize or communicate your theorems properly. From the bottom of my heart mate... I bet you have 10,000 things about you where you are better than me, so this is not from a place of envy but compassion and... I see a younger version of myself... These are trappings. Don't believe me? Here's a good challenge for you then. Start piece by piece to eat through the corpus of philosophical works that we have compiled over human history. IF you have genuinely original ideas, so original that no other human being has approximated it or communicated anything quite like it anywhere in recorded history...well at least you would have the vocabulary and context in which you could make your thoughts and ideas heard..and you would definitely get a community out of showing everyone your philosophical curiosities and development. Hell, I'd join in! I like some stuff from your Piano Collection Vol.1 btw Have a good day Reudi!

[@ReudiKnights]

I very much appreciate your comment, and I appreciate you taking the time to specify your points explicitly. The truth is, I arrived at an understanding of reality, not through reading books, watching videos, listening to teachers, or finding answers in anyone/anything else. I found answers, simply through looking. If it happens to sound alike hinduism and other various philosophies/philisophers, could it not be the case that it's because if you do look at reality, you will find truth, and that is something that anyone can do. The reason they sound alike, is because there's only so much one can do within the limitations of language, and only a finite amount of ways that one can word the same thing. Another way of looking at this, is: who was the first person to discover questioning reality? Did they learn that from someone else? And did that person learn it from someone before that, and so on? Could it not be possible that we don't need to be referring to other people's findings all the time, in order to find truth ourselves? Could it not be possible, that simply to experience reality (meaning experience all of it, including the depths of our minds), is fundamental to what we actually are? And could it be possible that multiple different people have arrived at simular truth, simply because it's not a belief, or an idea, but is true, but they all have different ways of articulating it? For example, some claims of truth happen to be extremely one sided, yet other claims of truth consider all sides. Could it not be possible that if anyone (not anyone special, or unique, but just anyone), could sit back, begin to question reality, and stumble across an absolute truth, that considers all possible truths, and is absolutely infinite, but sounds like someone else's finding of absolute truth, simply because it actually is absolutely true, and not because they're copying each other? In this instance, there would be no need for them to credit each other when sharing these insights with the world, as they did not come from anyone to credit, they just are true, beyond objectivity, subjectivity, perspective, belief, etc. I have read other books in the past, multiple books about philosophy, thinking, emotional work, self enquiry, but never found anything that was actually my direct experience, and if I would have shared that, then that would have been me sharing someone else's insights, but the point in which I found myself able to share something from me, was at the point I actually realised absolute truth, and I share what actually is my direct experience. As for naivety, that's a tough word to actually define. What exactly is it (in your definition) that defines the difference between naivety and experience? What would that look like to you? Once again, I invite this conversation, and thank you for your comment. I say all this with love 🙏

[@ReudiKnights]

And thank you mentioning the piano collection! That means a lot 🥰