0.45x Wide angle lens review

Just a short comparison of two 58mm wide angle lens adapters for my 550D kit lens. These are all over ebay and super cheap.
**UPDATE**. I often receive the same questions in the comments regarding the exact lenses I have used in this video. I would like to clarify a few things and offer an update on this review.
Here is a link to find the first cheaper lens used in this video: www.ebay.com/sc...
Here is the second: www.ebay.com/sc...
BUT!!! I have realised a few things after having used these two lenses for a while (and after reading a few helpful comments).
1: The more expensive lens suffers more from chromatic aberration (Google it) than the cheaper lens.
2: I think the only reason the expensive lens does not have vignetting is that it is simply not as wide as the cheaper lens. (wanna see for yourself? open my video in two tabs, pause the first video when the cheap adapter is on [2:58] and pause the other when the expensive lens is on [4:38]. compare)
So in hindsight, I would now actually recommend going for the cheap lens and simply zooming a little on the lens itself or in post production.

[@thebuzzybeehive8803]

Thank you very much for this post! Sorry, I am late to the party!!! But, you did exactly what I would like to see out of other KZbinrs!!! You did an "in real time" showing how your lenses work. One thing that really irks me about KZbinrs, is they will show how to do something from another camera instead of placing it on the camera that they are using, then expecting us to just believe that what they are showing will or won't work based on their say so. I like seeing this in real time because I know for a fact that you haven't made any alterations to your set up, other than what you are talking about!!! Excellent vlog! I have subscribed and liked and you didn't even ask for it in your review!!!

[@hiphopsuperman]

Thank you! So sorry for the late reply, but I appreciate the kind words! We need more people like you on KZbin!

[@rascalhusky8129]

Very good educational video. I just bought one from value village Alberta Canada. It cost 13 Canadian dollars. Best video I have watched on this subject .

[@hiphopsuperman]

Thanks man! Yup, I had to take the plunge and buy these two adapters because there weren't many reviews on-line. Figured I would help anyone out there with questions.

[@tombic6373]

Best video on how to use these lenses that I have found.

[@RubenLopez360]

You're totally right about the chromatic aberrations on the second adapter. They're perfectly visible in the border of the picture on the wall WOW!

[@MaximumMadnessStixon]

I just ordered the cheaper kit (Wide, Macro, Telephoto lens adapter kit) for like $40, and from this video, it seems to be worth the price. Money is tight, and I don't have hundreds (even thousands) of dollars for buying individual lenses. Thanks for this review, it helped me out in making a decision.

[@IVANHOECHAPUT]

I looked everywhere for the lens called, "The First One", and couldn't find it anywhere. Then I searched for "The Second One", and couldn't find a manufacturer or any lens by those names either. So glad you changed the names to "The More Expensive Lens", and "The Cheaper Lens" So I could look these up. Update: I'm now looking for a lens called, "The Bigger One" and "The Smaller One" - wish me luck!

[@hiphopsuperman]

These are off brand lenses, made in China by many different manufacturers. Check out the links I included in the description of the video. Browse eBay until you see one that look like “the first one” and “the second one”. This video was made 8 years ago and the sellers I purchased from are long ago out of business. Good luck!

[@GuyFoxxx]

Yes, you can. They screw in into the lens' filter thread. just get the same size as your filters. If you don't know the size, you should be able to find it on the back of the lens cap (for example, 52mm, 72mm, etc).

[@FeuerwerkATZE]

Look at 3:17 what is happen to the dog? how fast is he DAMN!

[@amaarsh]

it is just a cut in the video whats make it fast

[@FeuerwerkATZE]

haha :D

[@afrosymphony8207]

+FeuerwerkATZE that scared the shit outta me too loool i was like where the fuck did that lil fucker come from????

[@microwar]

+FeuerwerkATZE I'ts a glitch in the Matrix.

[@maxnook8633]

Yeah, definitely a lot of chromatic aberration with the more expensive one. Thanks for the review.

[@clonkex]

+Sam Nook I was thinking the same thing. I'm no camera expert by any stretch of the imagination and I still noticed it the instant he put the second lens on.

[@MrGuilhermeFernandes]

I actually think the first is the best because it doesn't have any chromatic aberration, the second does have chromatic aberration and it actually crops a little bit more then the first.

[@2315MARCO]

Yeah, I think going to a camera store that has these adapters would be a good advantage to know how it looks like and works before purchasing them online.

[@joecal2360]

Great review, thank you very much!

[@hiphopsuperman]

Yes, it does soften the image a bit. Watch in HD to see the difference.

[@THISshowSUX]

Another thing to take into consideration is to be sure to remove the filter or lens protector even though they have threads on them that little space add will help reduce the vinager thingy.

[@hiphopsuperman]

Absolutely. The cheaper lens is better in that sense. Actually someone else left a comment about how there is no vignetting on the second lens simply because its just not as wide, and I think he is right.

[@Guillotines_For_Globalists]

That big lens looks fantastic. I have a very similar, generic wide angle lens like your small one. Looks identical! But that big one looks even better!

[@harper222]

Note: The quality of your photos will drop dramatically when your aperture is low. Where it SEEMS like a good deal, you're actually hindering your photographs. I've had both and I recommend saving up to buy a lens that costs a lot more.

[@hiphopsuperman]

Yes! You can indeed separate the Macro lens from the wide angle lens on both models I review here!

[@PatOutdoorify]

first review which actually shows what the difference is, thanks a lot!! You convinced me to order one (the widest one).

[@JeffSpeers]

There is something to be said with why Canon charges +$400 for their add on wide adaptor. Canon's only goes to 0.7 wider on most of theirs.

[@dahlgrenjr]

BTW, I went for the cheaper one, starving art student and all, lol. I love its wide angle functioning, but, I was unsure on the Macro side. You cleared up my questions in the first 10 seconds of the video. Great job on the review and thanks again!

[@hiphopsuperman]

the scenes with a fisheye look is actually achieved by stacking these two lenses together.

[@hiphopsuperman]

Do you know how a UV filter screws right to the front of your lens? This is how this lens attaches to the kit lens, no adapters needed. And yes, the cost on ebay includes worldwide shipping to most of the world (including the Netherlands). It ships from China, so expect 2 weeks shipping.

[@hiphopsuperman]

This is correct, the outer diameter is indeed 58mm. Sorry about that!

[@DigitalPuppeteer]

The second adapter might not have vignetting, but it has terrible chromatic aberration, you can clearly see it at the edges of the frame.

[@vaietehQ]

That was a really good review ! Thanks for that; I really considered about buying an actual wide-angle macro lens from Tamron for £305 roughly but this made me stop and re-consider, like you, £305 is a bit pricey for me :)

[@Schn00ky]

Thanks, this was very informative! I'm actually waiting for the cheaper one in the post atm, but I think I will eventually buy the 2nd one you got.

[@hiphopsuperman]

Thanks! Did you read the description of the video? I suggest you just stick with the cheaper of the 2. :)

[@Schn00ky]

hiphopsuperman Lol yeah I probably should read ALL of the description, I see what you are getting at. I'll have a play around myself once it gets here, thanks again thou, much appreciated!

[@hiphopsuperman]

HAHA! I love that your the second person to call my chihuahua a cat! Cheers!

[@hiphopsuperman]

Great! Did you see the update in the video description? I actually recommend the cheaper one now.

[@D7NEWTON7]

thanks for uploading this video it makes me more confident to buy a cheap wide angle lens off ebay

[@hiphopsuperman]

Will you be using this lens on a Canon 18-55mm kit lens? Then search ebay for "0.45x 52mm". The outer diameter of the Canon kit lens is 52mm.

[@hiphopsuperman]

Actually, I think your right! That means you could probably get the cheaper one and just zoom in a bit.

[@FlipFlopsQ]

Great video and thanks for the follow-up. Purchasing now.

[@deewells1965]

Interesting how many dealers do not offer specifications to know one from the other... Amazon, etc. What exact brand/model are these?

[@NGRAY1980]

The dog " please finish your review so I can have some peace & quiet"

[@redguigui2]

Why is the cheaper more expensive than the normaly expensive one in the links ?

[@hiphopsuperman]

I think they are both very similar. I think they are each equally wide.

[@keithdawes2685]

Excellent, well made, and interesting review. Thanks for the really useful info.

[@hiphopsuperman]

Im not using a 77mm lens? The outer ring diameter of the kit lens is 58mm.

[@hlsmithphoto]

Thank you. Took a lot of guess work out of a purchase.

[@hiphopsuperman]

Here ya go! Search "43mm 0.45x" on ebay. They are available for 18$ with free shipping worldwide.

[@KetansaCreatesArt]

Man, you are one of the best reviewer in just one video attempt...but just one video? Did you start some other channel? or...is everything well brother?

[@8Stuff]

thank you some random man from 12 years ago!

[@hiphopsuperman]

As you mention, this may be due to the nature of your lens. Im really unsure though. Mine does indeed get a bit blurry on the edges and I lose sharpness all over.

[@heyitsnazninidris]

very nice. i was thinking of getting one soon for my dslr. plus I'm using 550d canon tooooo!! :)

[@hiphopsuperman]

I'm not sure I understand your question. Can't you just zoom in a little to get rid of the vignetting?

[@bobsort]

The small one has wider angle. I think if you cut the corners in post, it will be almost same size of picture as expensive one. however important matter for me is, which one has smaller color degrade of pink and green?

[@mytubegj]

Thanks, I'm just starting out so your video was very helpful!

[@extemos6476]

Thanks for the quick video very useful.

[@desibro08]

Awesome video! Thanks!

[@GoldenPidgeon]

The 1st is slightly wider but you'd have to crop to remove the vignetting so it'd probably end up a smaller framed image in post. You can really see the chromatic aberration around the edge of the tv - dang! I wanted to get the 2nd 1 due to the lack of the vignetting. Do you have any other vids reviewing these (or other) 0.45x lenses, and any in 720 or 1080p ?

[@hiphopsuperman]

Huh? Are you asking which one I bought?

[@SergSpace]

It looks like with adapter on the sharpness noticeably off.

[@mrwellington102]

Good video. I have a better understanding now. Thanks

[@LastNinjaBB6]

Great short review! A few questions though: 1.) How much do these weigh? (all my lenses have plastic frames, and even worse the thread for these attachments & filters are quite thin) 2.) When taking photos with these adapters you say its soft - How soft? Sharp enough for 2MP photos? 3MP? 8MP? 3.) How does it work outdoor? I want to capture nature landscape - Would it be possible or is this lens prone to foggyness, dull colors, flares, etc? I can live with CA's

[@hiphopsuperman]

HAHA, I bestow upon you 100 Internet points for referring to my Chihuahua as a cat/dog!

[@intheMixup]

super great video, thank you for all the great information....

[@steliosena]

Great review. Since there are many different adapters on ebay, maybe you could post a link to one similar to the bigger adapter (the second one without the vignette issue) ? Thanks in advance!

[@dahlgrenjr]

Thanks, dude! You helped me out a ton. I really REALLY appreciate it.

[@Freemanfanme]

Thank for your review.

[@EshaKarim]

Great Video! Thank you! It's even cheaper now at 75SEK, just ordered from ebay :)

[@hiphopsuperman]

Enjoy!

[@oldguardkennels128]

Thanks for doing this

[@markustolenitno]

Does anyone know what brand or model the larger one is?

[@kinn11]

hmm honestly i prefer the cheaper one (IMO) cause chromattic abberation seems stronger on the expensive one, easier to deal with vingette ig

[@alfiet6876]

The second lens made the colouring a bit weird...

[@amupiz]

chromatic aberation on 2nd lens is awfull :/

[@jorgepeterbarton]

I kind of like the lower quality and the 'toy lens' vibe of the first. But the vignetting is annoying, a bit to hard to even call it a kitsch effect.

[@LJfilmsscooter]

really good review thanks helped a lot

[@Elbows-Deep]

chromatic abrasion on the second lens is painful and bright, really stand out round the picture on the left wall and tv on the right. i would rather the first one, much sharper and can sort dark corners easy. i might just have a go now i seen this, thank for the video, helpful info. *****

[@DesoloZantas]

AW WHAT!? second place....maaaaan *kicks a rock*

[@denniscrespo5371]

Great and a helpful review! Can you please provide the specification of the 2nd lens converter (expensive) Thanks!

[@LeonardoDiPeachey1]

when i screw mine on to my canon 550d, nothing happens, its as if there is no fisheye!?

[@brunorrsilva]

superb video. Really cool.

[@hiphopsuperman]

Yup.

[@Darlavonderheide]

That was very helpful. Thank you.

[@hiphopsuperman]

How bad is the blurring? Keep in mind anytime you put glass in front of more glass, you will lose sharpness.

[@DesoloZantas]

no one noticed the teleporting cat on the couch?

[@hiphopsuperman]

You're welcome. I assume it is because your JVC lens is so small, it is only using the centre portion of the wide angle lens adapter?

[@2H2K]

Thank you for the Review.

[@kristofferdidriksen5265]

Very helpful! Think I'm gonna buy the cheap one

[@steliosena]

oh thanks!

[@itube612]

Well thank you for your review, it's very helpful. They both cause certain disortion of perspective, lower quality of the focus somehow and let noticeably less light in. But having a crop factor 1.6 makes me want to get this for the interior shots for simple reason, i can push myself beyond the rear wall just to get what I need into the viewfinder ;-) The vignetting can be cropped out and certain decrease in quality and clarity is tolerable as far as i GET all important into compositions. Thanks for sharing your experience. Make more videos, you're good at it and neat to listen to.

[@stephanes.]

What if we use it combined with a metabones Speedbooster for BMPCC? Will it vignett?

[@hiphopsuperman]

Which of my wide angle lens adapters do you have? The first or second in my video?

[@grimpolaman]

Hi! What is the brand of the more expensive converter? I wanna get one. Thanks!

[@portscapefilms3885]

what is solution of black border on top of the footage its look like vignette...and give me purchasing link for sony camera too

[@syafiq1581]

I have a question, what does 58mm 0.45x means? some have 0.75x and some even 0.8x..? i know 58mm is the size of diameter of screw/ mount at need to attach to the main lens. Thank you in advance..

[@hiphopsuperman]

The 0.45x, 0.75x and 0.8x are to advise how much these adapters change the lens onto which they are attached. Multiply your lens focal length by these numbers to show how they will affect your lens. In my video, I used an 18mm lens, multiply by 0.45 makes it an 8.1mm lens. (0.75x would be 13.5mm and 0.8x would be 14.4mm)

[@syafiq1581]

+hiphopsuperman thank u.. noted..

[@hiphopsuperman]

Of course. Any time you put more glass in front of your lens, it's bound to happen. But again, it's 11 euros.

[@paddyryan9699]

Double check - I think it is 58 mm

[@EmilySmith77]

I bought one of these I have a nikon d7000 and its not reading that the lens is on??

[@KhawajaHassanAbdullah]

Thanks for the tips, dude...

[@derekgillan7314]

Should go to specsavers.

[@MARINEfreak06]

you know i have this lens and i have tried it on a dslr (t3i) and the vignette was really bad!

[@Josiphus96]

I have a quick question. I'm going to be filming a wildlife movie on my own. I won't be able to use my follow focus. Will a 0.45 wide angle lens give me focus? For instance, Devin Graham uses a wide angle lens in his shorts and the result is no need for a follow focus. His shots are always focused. Thanks!

[@linvol20]

I was going to buy the cheaper one but i wouldnperfer one withot the viinetting bc i have a prime lens

[@hiphopsuperman]

No prob!

[@andreio15]

The second one doesn't have vignetting, but boy that's a lot of CA...

[@MarioxJolienSpiderFreak]

+Andrei Petrea CA?

[@normietwiceremoved]

+Mario x Jolien I think he means chromatic abberation

[@MarioxJolienSpiderFreak]

MEMES ARE REPULSIVE oh ok thx :D

[@hiphopsuperman]

Yup. Read the description of the video.

[@denisbujoreanu5993]

The chromatic aberrations on the first one show heavily when you're at 18 mm focal so max wide angle as well. They do get lower though as you zoom in and around 21-23 mm focal on the 18-55mm kit lens on a Canon 1200D the CA is actually quite pleasant and the vignetting is virtually gone, not noticeable or at worse pleasing :)

[@Realgah]

The second seems to be better, what changes?

[@dustinbradley8334]

ben affleck?