1.4 Validity, Truth, Soundness, Strength, Cogency

  Рет қаралды 62,847

Mark Thorsby

Mark Thorsby

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 63
@valerieberger105
@valerieberger105 9 жыл бұрын
My midterms are in a week and you saved like 75% of a college freshman's life. Thank you.
@ChaceBonanno
@ChaceBonanno 6 жыл бұрын
This is like logic inception! Concepts keep progressively stemming out from the previous concept. The cumulative nature of the subject would be much too confusing to grasp without the videos, but thanks to Mark Thorsby I learn more every video. Thank you for taking your time to create these! Love how you're evidently passionate about the subject, helps to motivate me.
@jonahmccollom9895
@jonahmccollom9895 2 жыл бұрын
I hang on your every word... I have never listened to another human being so intently...
@Sui_Generis0
@Sui_Generis0 Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@ObeyAddie
@ObeyAddie 8 жыл бұрын
19:31 "who knows what that is" LOLOLOL i wish this dude was my teacher lmao
@stevenf5902
@stevenf5902 4 жыл бұрын
I died at that part too haha xD
@ItsTemLock
@ItsTemLock 6 жыл бұрын
I am currently taking this exact course. Your videos have been extremely helpful. Hurley's book has been so dry so thanks for lightening it up.
@qasimraza3377
@qasimraza3377 4 жыл бұрын
Do you have pdf format of the book?
@puritymanu7777
@puritymanu7777 3 жыл бұрын
@@qasimraza3377 yeah I have it
@heatherwhite708
@heatherwhite708 6 жыл бұрын
Changing the bank argument to a valid one. "All banks are financial institutions. Wells Fargo is a bank. Therefore, Wells Fargo is a financial institution." Changing the terms around forms it into a sound argument. Thank you for these videos. I wish my instructor had the option to use this book. It seems to better explain what I've been struggling with for a few weeks now.
@chanho8198
@chanho8198 Жыл бұрын
Hello how is life right now?
@victorhammond121
@victorhammond121 9 жыл бұрын
i love your posts Mr. Thorsby. they are more clearer and understandable and i need help with Axioms, Paradoxes and Problem Solving
@gianrivero6149
@gianrivero6149 9 жыл бұрын
This was so helpful, thank you so much for your help.
@clickhorse01
@clickhorse01 10 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for these videos. I am finding them very helpful.
@xiaodongwang7753
@xiaodongwang7753 3 жыл бұрын
This is good stuff. I’m gonna get the Hurly book and do an on-line course with Professor Thorsly.
@bwar8479
@bwar8479 10 жыл бұрын
Thanks for putting this up Introduction to logic 13th edition by copi/cophen wasn't explaining this part very well.
@christopherperalta2960
@christopherperalta2960 9 жыл бұрын
thank you so much for your help
@kronosoglu7597
@kronosoglu7597 4 жыл бұрын
We may call the first inductive argument example strong and cogent also for the fact that the younger dinasaur bones are likely to be found in the upper stages of the soil rather than deeper as they die after the older dinasaurs and covered with land later on. Sorry about my English if my sentence wasn't understandable.
@michele6691
@michele6691 10 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU!!!!!!! for this post!
@Azenzar74
@Azenzar74 7 жыл бұрын
thank you dr.mark!
@dofl
@dofl 2 жыл бұрын
You teach so good ❤️
@FreddiesLab
@FreddiesLab Жыл бұрын
Great video thanks homie
@bezawiteshetu2931
@bezawiteshetu2931 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much ....!!!
@liamhoward2208
@liamhoward2208 4 жыл бұрын
12:04 A nugget worth holding on to! P.S....I didnt know Edward Snowden taught Logic!
@MaxBenitez83
@MaxBenitez83 11 жыл бұрын
Professor Thorsby, I'm having trouble figuring out whether the following argument is valid or not: "Since the Department of Defense Building in Washington, D.C. has the shape of a hexagon, it follows that it has seven sides". Although both the premise and conclusion are false, the premise appears to support the conclusion. That's why I'd think that the argument is valid. It would be clearly valid if the conclusion stated that the building had six sides rather than seven.
@yemaani
@yemaani 11 жыл бұрын
You Are Awesome. I just did subcribe to your channel so I can keep visiting it and learn more philosophy and Logic.
@4MarksMojo
@4MarksMojo 7 жыл бұрын
Prof Thornsby, Which program are you using to record, illustrate, and type in this series?
@nicht_ritter
@nicht_ritter Жыл бұрын
So validity of an argument is its form in which it express itself while soundness shows if the argument is true or false? Am I right?
@alperturna4371
@alperturna4371 4 жыл бұрын
How the heck is it possible? a university instructor tries to explain same content for 5 classes and I still dont understand. But I understand this 30minute video! University system is collapsing....
@danilomirandasantana6156
@danilomirandasantana6156 6 жыл бұрын
amazing man, thanks.
@TheLupe8735
@TheLupe8735 11 жыл бұрын
Professor can you please fix your picture , so i can see what you're writing? Thank You.
@contrarianthinker
@contrarianthinker 5 жыл бұрын
Do you have something on how to find the gap in the argument or the assumption in the argument
@hassanezouicha8658
@hassanezouicha8658 4 жыл бұрын
Plz can anyone explain the difference between an inductive argument and an invalid deductive argument ?
@alperturna4371
@alperturna4371 4 жыл бұрын
thanks thanks thanks!
@isoundmechanical7127
@isoundmechanical7127 Жыл бұрын
who knows what that is, i certainly dont
@trdi
@trdi 7 жыл бұрын
It's unfortunate that mathematics and logic use "induction" in different way. Contradictory even, as mathematical induction is actually a deductive process. Things like that bother me.
@bradenglass4753
@bradenglass4753 2 жыл бұрын
how exactly is a weak inductive argument uncogent by necessity? If cogent just means that the argument's conclusion is true and uncogent is that it is false, can't we have a weak inductive argument that has a true conclusion? not sure how a weak inductive argument cant be cogent.
@bayuhasmamaw6517
@bayuhasmamaw6517 2 жыл бұрын
tanx
@EaszyInitials
@EaszyInitials 5 жыл бұрын
"Barak" "Liklihood"
@ahmadsajid1127
@ahmadsajid1127 2 жыл бұрын
barack*
@The_Wizard_1-r1t
@The_Wizard_1-r1t 2 жыл бұрын
17:00
@fluxcap6537
@fluxcap6537 Жыл бұрын
uhh sir, it's "Barack" not "Barak" I believe this makes your argument invalid by minor spelling mistake
@mikemcinally3311
@mikemcinally3311 7 жыл бұрын
👍
@sleepinggorilla
@sleepinggorilla 3 жыл бұрын
You like Rob Schneider Rob Schneider is in all of Adam Sandler's movies. Thus you must actually like Adam Sandler movies.
@ChrisSargent-f5j
@ChrisSargent-f5j Ай бұрын
Young Gary Moore David Miller Helen
@MrPabloguida
@MrPabloguida 8 жыл бұрын
An example of a valid argument against gay married would be: All homosexual invidious who are married are unhappy. Pedro is a homosexual married person. Therefore, Pedro in unhappy. This is a unsound valid deductive argument Obs: I'm totally in favour of love no matter the gender! :)
@Ataraxia-vz5vx
@Ataraxia-vz5vx 10 жыл бұрын
An "invalid deductive argument..." Say whaaaaat? lol
@Zen-lz1hc
@Zen-lz1hc 2 жыл бұрын
Like
@joshuareynolds6483
@joshuareynolds6483 7 жыл бұрын
to be president you have to be 35
@servantoftheexpander9688
@servantoftheexpander9688 2 жыл бұрын
Nope to be a president you have to be a hypocrite
@sameersheikh5044
@sameersheikh5044 4 жыл бұрын
Some editing will help. Your face is covering up important information.
@geeblenhoff1
@geeblenhoff1 5 жыл бұрын
your face keeps getting in the way of your writing when you are giving examples.
@polentaonthefloor
@polentaonthefloor 8 жыл бұрын
33:53 that moment when getting KZbin money is more important than your offspring.
@TXSagira
@TXSagira 8 жыл бұрын
He's a professor so he makes this for his classes lol I'm taking his online class and he's great! He did cut the video shortly after so I'm sure he took care of his kid.
@bobswift3347
@bobswift3347 10 жыл бұрын
run through is good but flawed, book is beter
@afreenyousaf9438
@afreenyousaf9438 6 жыл бұрын
You should make ur videos shorter
1.5  Argument Forms:  Proving Invalidity
26:44
Mark Thorsby
Рет қаралды 42 М.
1.2  Recognizing Arguments
26:02
Mark Thorsby
Рет қаралды 92 М.
Triple kill😹
00:18
GG Animation
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
бабл ти гель для душа // Eva mash
01:00
EVA mash
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
4.3 Venn Diagrams & The Modern Square of Opposition
40:19
Mark Thorsby
Рет қаралды 35 М.
Critical Thinking: Deductive and Inductive Arguments 1
40:40
Fayetteville State University
Рет қаралды 165 М.
1.3  Deduction & Induction
36:07
Mark Thorsby
Рет қаралды 73 М.
4.5 The Traditional Square of Opposition
28:52
Mark Thorsby
Рет қаралды 30 М.
1.1  Basic Concepts:  Arguments, Premises, & Conclusions
35:32
Mark Thorsby
Рет қаралды 340 М.
6.5  Indirect Truth Tables
34:09
Mark Thorsby
Рет қаралды 32 М.
Determining Validity of an Argument Using a Truth Table
36:26
Christopher Scott Vaughen
Рет қаралды 48 М.