Mr. Forder, I very much enjoyed your video, and I look forward to learning more about the history of secularism in the UK.
@robertforder83034 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@inger2334 жыл бұрын
Great stuff
@888men4 жыл бұрын
very interesting, I had no idea that the NSS was established such a long time ago.
@robertforder83034 жыл бұрын
A long and proud heritage!
@DBIVUK4 жыл бұрын
I see your bookshelf includes 'the libellous life'.
@robertforder83034 жыл бұрын
Yes. As you probably know the settlement included a provision they should be destroyed, but there are a few around. The items I'm proudest of are a first edition of "Age of Reason" and my collection of birth control pamphlets and ephemera.
@michelangelope8302 жыл бұрын
I think therefore i exist, therefore i was created or always existed and the creator was created or always existed, therefore God exists. I challenged humanity to debate with me the existence of God.
@emmanuelpasteur2833 Жыл бұрын
Seems like this was posted perhaps over a year ago, I wonder if you are still looking for a challenger? I am not eloquent in speech but I would not mind hearing you out, which position do you take on the proposed debate?
@michelangelope830 Жыл бұрын
@@emmanuelpasteur2833 You can not lose a debate against an atheist. Creation is what has a beginning of existence or is not eternal, like for example yourself. The question "does God exist?" means "does the creator of the creation exists?" or "was the creation created from something or nothing?" or "was the creation created from something that exist or from something that doesn't exist?". Atheists ask for evidence that the creation was created from something that exist instead of something that doesn't exist because they claim the burden of proof is on the person making the positive claim. The proof that the creation was created from something that exist is that it is impossible that was created from something that doesn't exist! An analogy would be that a knock on the door is heard and a theist claimed something hits the door and an atheist didn't believe something hit the door until it is proven! Should not atheists provide evidence how the creation was created from something that doesn't exist since they are claiming an impossibility or miracle happened? Nothing would suffice as evidence when evidence is not wanted, and the proof is that atheists defend an idea without any arguments rejecting the logic that they consider irrefutable proof when the conclusion is not that God exists.