10 CK2 Features CK3 Needs

[@biggiec8224]

One thing i really wanna see is the introduction of a more complex legal system, where there are a variety of different laws that have to be voted on by your council. One of my favourite features in CK2 was fighting my way through discontent vassals that kept trying to stonewall my legislative agenda. This would add so much intrigue and complexity to the game and would make your realm feel more like a cohesive entity rather than just some dude's personal possession. You could see your kingdom slowly becoming more and more centralized as time passes by.

[@Soul_Tomato]

I feel like Vicky 3 does this so I would love to see that brought over

[@paulsbertulis3438]

@@Soul_Tomato Vicky 3 does it poorly

[@DriftLV1]

@@paulsbertulis3438 Vic3 does it fantastically, what are you talking about? It's one of the few things the game does right.

[@paulsbertulis3438]

@@DriftLV1 Vic 3 has a Civil war every time you sneeze. It's not congruent with how anything ever worked during the Time. It's what causes random French Theocracies and Prussian Ancap states to appear.

[@DriftLV1]

@@paulsbertulis3438 You must be bad at the game then, because I only get civil wars if I don't know what I'm doing.

[@JimRFF]

Glitterhoof, my beloved Chancellor...

[@SirBoggins]

F&B REFERENCE!

[@1451Danny]

Glad to see glitterhoof at number one

[@Soul_Tomato]

Glitterhoof when

[@mementomori771]

Cringehoof ruining my immersion no thanks

[@Viet_Nam_Ball]

Also I remember there being dragon, dog, bear,… in ck2

[@1451Danny]

@@Viet_Nam_Ball yeah! I know for sure the bear and dragon were used with absurd events off. You would fight a bear character usually as a last rank in a viking warrior lodge, and the dragon used without absurd events for the dragon king bloodline. If that ruler completed that bloodline, years after their death they would be changed into a dragon portrait, alongside their culture changing to dragon too

[@donpollo3154]

honestly madness in general I think should be expanded. Hearing about what people like Caligula or George III got up to makes me wanna live that life in ck3

[@KVP424]

I know some people don’t enjoy it too much, but I really love supernatural, cult, and general weirdness that last few CK2 DLC. So I kinda hope that return.

[@Soul_Tomato]

I think they’re slowly realizing this isn’t like a true to period medieval sim. It’s just goofy town and we like it that way.

[@D-sQU1NTER]

In the meantime, I hightly recommend the mod called Witchcraft. It expands witchcraft gameplay, adds magic, witch hunters, demons,etc. It feels like it was always part of CK3. I do hope for those dlcs as well but paradox said theyre gonna be leaning into more realistic simulation this time :C

[@Sneed-Feed-N-Seed]

They should compromise and make it an end of the year flavor DLC. It would make it an optional experience but still allow them to add wackier options they wouldn't get away with otherwise.

[@braincell4536]

@@Soul_Tomato When they added the whole travelling system and then fleshing it out in Roads to Power to a fully fledged unlanded character thing. This is no longer period accurate Crusader Kings, this is now Crusader Kings: The 4X RPG simulator. But it opens up so much possibilities that it can still be period accurate lol.

[@dragonrykr]

​@@Soul_Tomato I don't

[@javontaypeoples9603]

Please for the love of god bring back the OG boat system in CK2. Having ships and using boats and having ports was a HUGE part of history and is still huge to this day. It made playing somewhere like England better because you'd have the security of knowing your enemies cant cross the channel but also the dread of knowing your mainland allies will have a hard time carrying their ships across too. You could build up countries to be able to blitz to crusade targets to get the most war score faster, and also made it so raiding as a biking required you to actually invest in ships to be able to hold all your nice and cool loot.

[@justdirt]

What i want is really simple but the hardest thing to just do. That is, write like 200k more words of flavor text. Simply put, at a certain point, you've seen almost every single event or pop-up there is. Every new DLC brings a ton of content yes, but it doesn't change the normal day to day rulings. There should be region, culture, and faith exclusive events. If I'm playing as a ruler in West Africa, I should get different events than someone in India or Western Europe. It's easy to say, "Just write more," but as a writer myself, ik it's not that easy. However, I've seen how much writing goes into total conversion mods. Ik that putting things like this into the game isn't hard. All the groundwork is already laid out

[@Soul_Tomato]

Sounds like you’d enjoy RICE a lot

[@alphasword5541]

They desperately need to hire writers, or if they already have them, hire more. A massive chunk oft he game is text, and part of the job wouldn't just be creating more text but also considering how those texts and event setups fit together. CK2's writing being less specific made it feel way more immersive than a lot of events in CK3.

[@sizanogreen9900]

I hate to just offload the job to the modders but as Soul_Tomato already pointed out, there is plenty a mod out there for just that and more.

[@draganescuconstantin2380]

We need Coronations and a more complex system for forming Kingdoms/Empires. All this would also flesh out the Legitimacy system that we have, which is kinda barebones (Paradox tied it mostly to Plagues and Legends and didn't really integrate it with other systems which isn't very good). And of course a Papacy redesign. Historically the Pope played a huge role in recognizing Kings/newly formed Kingdoms and for a long time the Holy Roman Emperor was crowned in Rome.

[@goofygoober1816]

That would make the game significantly more fleshed out. Pressing a button and just saying you're the emperor doesn't make much sense. Also, I kinda hate how you have to have a certain amount of provinces to form a duchy, kingdom, etc. I feel like there should be another way of forming things like getting the pope to back you or smthn.

[@mankeymonki2833]

I really wish they would add naval combat and naval stuff in general. It's really funny when you're disembarking and pass through an enemies ship and nothing happens.

[@Soul_Tomato]

Yeah I think that’s coming. It has to right?

[@FromRussiaWithLuv007]

Bc that’s kinda how it was back then. Navy wasn’t a big thing (except maybe the Byzantine… but ship to ship combat was just not as prevalent… )

[@screamingseal4805]

@@FromRussiaWithLuv007yes it was what the fuck are you smoking 😂

[@mankeymonki2833]

@@FromRussiaWithLuv007 I’d have to disagree with you, I think naval warfare was actually quite important during the medieval period, the idea that "navy wasn’t a big thing., doesn’t really make sense to me The Byzantine Empire relied heavily on its navy to control the Mediterranean, using advanced ships like dromons and naval weaponry like Greek fire, which they would spew out of tubes like a flamethrower. Also, powerful maritime city-states like Venice and Genoa built strong navies to dominate trade routes and expand their influence. Since Crusader Kings III covers the period from 867 to 1453, naval power was a key factor throughout this time span, making naval combat and fleets a part of warfare and politics. Therefore, adding naval mechanics would make the game better.

[@FromRussiaWithLuv007]

@@mankeymonki2833 kzbin.info/www/bejne/qWeqfZprfZtmlassi=L9FG9zHgs1xnIYDI

[@SirBadgerton]

I need sunset invasion back. I miss the Aztecs invading Ireland, building pyramids out of their homes and then beginning to sacrifice people by the thousands.

[@Memanruler]

With how important Coronations were back then it's kinda insane that they aren't in the game. Mods have done a good job filling in the meantime but for a European King, especially in Central/West Europe, being crowned by a bishop/cardinal/Pope was SO valuable to political security. In a society so controlled by tradition and dogma, the act of being given The Orb and The Scepter by God gave enormous prestige and power to the crowned.

[@herkles5416]

Going to make a little thread as I got thoughts on the various points. Also to feed the algorithm :) 1.) I do think that we will get some sort of Crusade improvement in the future. It is a highly requested feature, and the 1178 start date does make a lot of sense to improve upon it for then. that said I don't think that Muslims should just get the same thing. It should be more flavored around Ghazi and their own views of the time on holy war. This would make playing as them feel both more historical and different. 2.) So in regards to the college of Cardinals, I want to see them back but improved but also not all the time. Let me explain. The Cardinals only selected the pope starting in 1061. Before then they were effectively the plaything of the Emperor and the Roman Nobility. so in 867 it shouldn't be there, it could happen with a gregorian reform movement. But if you are say the Karlings and able to restore the empire or the Ottonians succeed in their ambitions then it shouldn't happen. This would also give the start dates different feels in regards to papal power and influence. This should come along with different outcomes for the investiture controversy and the papal struggle with the pope.

[@herkles5416]

3.) I agree sort of. Maybe not in the way that they were implemented in ck2 but I do think having regents for kingdoms would be good. You should be encouraged to hold court in your kingdoms, to travel there and visit your vassals. But travel takes time and while you are away there should be someone looking over things, hence regents. This is how the Godwins gained power and influence, they were the regents for Cnut and his family when they weren't in england. 4.) So yes and no. I 100% think that you shouldn't be a member of them for the landed characters, and for the longest time I long felt that they shouldn't come back at all. and I do stick by for landed characters things like monastaries shouldn't be there. but for landless Adventurers, I could see that being there as a possibility and make sense for them. 5.) Coronations should IMO be an activity that you have to travel to. It should be like a wedding. And it should be done for other things, ala co-kings. Related to this should be elections. If you have an election for your title it should be possible to do some shenniganary and waylay your opponents with schemes or bribe others with titles and promises. Though in contrast to CK2 I think it should be there for all faiths not just catholic and fraticelli.

[@herkles5416]

6.) I 100% agree. But I don't think it should be just merchant republics, but all republics. City states and communes. With 1178 Novgorod and many of the northern italian city states aren't exactly merchant republics, but should be playable. That said I do agree that with admin government that it feels like it is on the horizon and it is something that people want. And I also agree trade should be there, not just the silk road but other trade routes, holding faires like the famous Champaigne fairs, and so on would be good. In regards to the crusades, as the maritime republics like Pisa, Genoa, or Venice, I would like to see being able to make my city a destination for crusaders. Let my city be where you guys embark from at a nominal fee of course. For the republic government themselves, I would like to see a variety of different forms it could evolve into. Venice as an example went through a lot of changes over the game's time period. The government structure wasn't the same in 867 as it was in 1066 nor in 1178 and beyond. Venice would have numerous different councils whose power was fought over, in addition to the doge. The concio, great council, council of ten, commune of venice, signoria, minor council, senate, etc. All fought over influence. having the player do stuff that leads to the Closing of the Great council would feel great IMO. and mind you this is just venice. Genoa, Pisa, Florence, Iceland, novgorod, the republic emirate of Cordoba, all should feel a bit different.

[@herkles5416]

7.) I agree and similar to republics I feel that with landless adventurers they are laying the ground work for nomadic government. In regard to trade routes, One Proud Bavarian had a mod with the various famous road networks. And it ties into things like travel and the like and I think that should be how trade routes work. These were well established paths for a reason and it would make travel down the famous roads feel well neat. 8.) Oh I agree. India is a place that should get plenty of love and care. 10.) going for a spicy take but I don't care that much here :P but to each their own.

[@Tom-mk7nd]

Akin to the viceroyalty title, I think all vassal's contracts should have an option to revert to the liege upon death (unchecked by default of course). That's how feudality started and even some fiefs were not hereditary well into the later periods, especially after medieval states started to become more centralised.

[@achenic4323]

I still remember in ck2 when that giant pit event opens up and i sacrificed my son too it. loved events like those. having an in game way to get immortality was cool as well

[@1992zorro]

This gives me hope as I know the CK3 Devs are in direct contact with the Tomato Guy

[@Soul_Tomato]

I yap and they listen! (This is not in fact what happens)

[@pandapotato5121]

I really do want them to add in some absurd things, from becoming immortal to having a horse councillor it would be so fun. And make it a game option to toggle so that for anyone who doesn't want the wackiness, they can just turn it off. Also, the ability to play more tall than wide would be great because after a while, there stops being much more to do than go and conquer other places

[@penzorphallos3199]

Ideas that were not present in ck2: -Claims should give cheaper cb on titles, cheaper title creation, higher initial control, some legitimacy. Spouse with claims should give half bonuses. -claims on kingdoms/empires should be eternal. They still exist today 200 years after the end of some kingdoms. -house allegiance, inverse of a feud. Get by helping or giving lands to a house. Less factions, more gifts, aid in wars, better aptitude. Medieval houses coordinated to feud on others, so why not to help. -siblings partition. The russians had partition between brothers, instead of partition between your own kids.

[@Soul_Tomato]

Interesting ideas

[@celwenileran2135]

Honestly, don'r particularly care for the claims. Meh. It's just resources. You'll manage just fine. However house allegiance? Now THAT is great. CK3 has always lacked the... personal touch. Even with the Friends and Foes DLC, it's kinda meh. Game would benefit from expansion upon the rivalry system and adding the opposite for it. Would really solidify its characters so much more. On topic of that, add loyalists faction.

[@macdeus2601]

I think the claim inheritance system in CK2 is designed to represent how likely people are to take you seriously in addition to what your character might literally claim. I mean, IIRC the current King of Spain still officially claims to also be the King of Jerusalem, but nobody's going to join the army to fight for that. Having them expire after a couple of generations if no one actually pushes them makes sense if they're meant represent real political issues that might lead to real conflicts. Plus it would get ridiculous since every character would eventually have claims to a thousand different things at once.

[@penzorphallos3199]

@@macdeus2601 there's not a thousand kingdom titles and you can make people renounce claims in ck3

[@penzorphallos3199]

Idea: Penitence. A travel activity where you lose a huge amount of prestige. 3 levels: -relation penitence, you travel to the home of a rival to defuse the rivalry. -A religious penitence to a church holding, to lose a negative fame trait like adulterous or deviant. -Another larger version, a penitence pilgrimage, to lose excomunication and decadence traits.

[@Soul_Tomato]

Great idea but way too harsh a penalty.

[@penzorphallos3199]

​@@Soul_Tomato thematically makes sense for ck3 as an rpg. Prestige is a currency mostly used for war, so it needs somekind of social use if youre not a warmonger npc or stuck inside a huge realm.

[@Casual_Killroy]

A Horse, My channel for a Horse! -Soul Tomato 2024

[@FromRussiaWithLuv007]

10:50 The Stallion that mounts the World

[@OUTLAW1345]

Beside the one you talked abut in this video i would like return of Sunset Invasion

[@Soul_Tomato]

I think tweaking it could make it quite compelling

[@juliusbols2437]

Personally i’d love to see something like jade dragon being added, having the ability to interact with china coupled with silk road mechanics and merchant republics would be awesome. I don’t see the need to waste a dlc on sub saharan Africa since most players have absolutely no interest in playing this region. And the historical significance of the region is almost null. For me it would be a waste of a DLC. So much more pressing stuff that could be added instead..

[@Soul_Tomato]

I think there’s a large player base that wants more African flavor personally. It shouldn’t be ignored just because people who never leave northern/central Europe won’t play it. Might as well make the map just Europe in that case. That’s my 2 cents on that matter

[@truman3047]

9:50 Yes! Yes! Yes! It's weird how contentious this opinion is. All of the ahistorical, goofy, unbalanced things from CK2 made it fun! I remember doing a playt hrough where I used Glitterhoof to turn my entire kingdom into horses, which then became Steppe Nomads that rode on the backs of humans into battle to conquer the world. The Secret Orders could turn you into a demigod practically. All of that stuff was FUN.

[@thelastdragon5678]

Trade and Republic is all but guaranteed for next year l only hope they add back navies in the game

[@Soul_Tomato]

I feel like there’s some building blocks for it

[@Felipe-yv4bc]

The AI for crusades needs to improve drastically. The fourth crusade as it's present right now is especially bad. The AI for some reason always focuses on sieging some irrelevant provinces in the Balkans instead of going for Constantinople..

[@Soul_Tomato]

The ai’s battle tactics are always insanely stupid

[@celwenileran2135]

The game is certainly going to continue going in a positive direction because next DLC is centred around travels. Game desperately needs more travel events because holy shit, the same crappy 15 events back to back firing is just tiresome.

[@Soul_Tomato]

That’s exactly what the next dlc is about

[@JamesH97Gaming]

I loved the shattered worlds mechanic in CK2 and I'd love to see it make a return in CK3 at some point.

[@aymanmiri111]

Same, I use the "More Game Rules" Mod which has that option ( without animal kingdoms though)

[@Ala-n1z]

I want the old holding system with army raising system back

[@Soul_Tomato]

I feel like (but could be wrong) someone made a mod for that

[@haydenarlo1950]

africa, china, and india getting more content would be so hype 🥺🙏

[@Eldagusto]

Agreeed!!!! Though I guess they tried to make covens replace some secret societies. But all good suggestions I wanted. I really want trade republics pumped in

[@Soul_Tomato]

I think they need to expand it then haha

[@Eldagusto]

@@Soul_Tomato definitely they did lay the ground work to do other stuff in a coven gathering but they haven’t done it yet! But I’m a sucker for forming covens as early as possible

[@kokosmaelk]

when they get around to merchant republics i hope they do a piracy system of some kind as well ideally something like adventures being able to ravage through trade routes or something like that

[@Soul_Tomato]

They do have the ability to raid supply lines in Vicky 3 so that could be sick

[@dr.garretsshow]

I miss societies, not only in the base game but it for mods too. One thing i have a problem with in ck3 is hyperfocus on intrigue. There are 4 other "vocations" in the game and while learning is powerfull it doesnt have much flavour. I much rather play as a warrior, monk or administrative focused character than spend half of the game schemming.

[@Seer_Of_The_Woodlands]

secret societies could really be a good addition to the game. especially if, like religions and cultures, you could create your own secret societies, etc. customize them etc. choose values ​​and rituals etc. i would like to see the rest of china + korea and japan etc added to the game. + silk road mechanics. etc. Great Video !

[@Soul_Tomato]

Exactly. I want to be an order of knights paradox pls.

[@tiernandarcy1413]

I need the general insanity of ck2 back. Plugging gateways to hell, fighting Cthulu in a row boat, sacrificing the pope to Satan over and over again... ah memories 😊

[@frankiecedeno3724]

My biggest problem is that I imagine it’ll take at least 3 years to get this stuff in with how the season passes work. I could definitely see nomads, merchant republics,or Theocracies as the $15, $20 or even $30 and it would vary depending on how much they are putting in. Theocracies could be the $30 assuming it brings big changes to Christian Religions, the College, and, of course, Crusades, but just as easily it could just be the Theocracy government and the college and that could be a $15 flavor pack. Similarly Nomads could bring in Asia and the Silk Road possibly being a DLC even bigger than Roads to Power or it could just be a government with very unique mechanics. Either way it’ll be years before all of it is implemented. I for one desperately want a $30 India DLC that radically uplifts the area, but realistically I think we’ll be lucky if we get a flavor pack.

[@mateuszslawinski1990]

One thing: customized great works. I can turn some steppe backwater in the middle of nowhere into beacon of civilization with 100 dev, why can't I build my own university/pyramid/lighthouse there?

[@iriky2651]

2:20 Viceroyalty system would be great for some kingdoms, such as the Crown of Aragon (in this case a king who would have another king as a vassal, but with a particular technological level / special decision) or for ONE emperor of the Holy Empire having centralized his power. Added 2 opposite legacies : Centralisation (more properties) or Décentralisation (more vassals) of our kingdom. In my opinion the game must become more unstable in the internal politics of a kingdom, and more historical in its territorial organization, such as for example with the presence of ONE AND ONLY emperor for ALL CHRISTIANITY (1 Catholic max and 1 Orthodox max) ; because in the imperial title awards a status of vicar of God on Earth... Same thing in Islam... Only one Calif and one Sultan (great emirate repleace sultanat for exemple).

[@faboscarlibur]

Back in Ck2 I had an event were I started the fourth crusade and destroyed the Byzantine as the Doge of Venice. It happened only one time and i have never seen something about this on the internet...

[@Soul_Tomato]

Historically accurate Venice

[@MildPsychedelic]

For me the most important part when it comes to any of these potential additions is how they integrate it into the existing flow of gameplay. I felt like some of the past DLC runs for EU4 and HOI4 felt tacked on and didn't play well with existing mechanics.

[@thepotatolord2139]

#1 request. Sunset Invasion 2: This Time It's Personal. (Seriously though I love ridiculous alternate history pls add more ridiculous alternate history)

[@Ronfost89]

Fighting as a knight in your lieges army. If the GoT mod can do it, the main game can too.

[@Soul_Tomato]

That’s a great point actually

[@Ronfost89]

@@Soul_Tomato It adds extra roleplay and danger, not to mention it makes prowess worthwhile.

[@BG-bj7cd]

One of my favorite memories of CK2 was playing as a demon child and geting the random event where Jesus provides military advice.

[@Soul_Tomato]

That sounds insane lol

[@college54114]

Request crusades sounds incredible

[@eggstinater]

I know other people won't agree but I always thought the absurd/magical elements of Crusader Kings were the most fun. If Paradox ever introduced a "fantasy" dlc I know I would be one of the first to buy it.

[@oversizedspeedbump9375]

trade is so essential. its unbelieveable that a grand strategy game released without a trade system

[@benjitheband5661]

My 50th comment praising the AoM music

[@Soul_Tomato]

My 50th comment saying “good taste”

[@Onzo22]

Actually, glitterhoof is in ck3. When you loaded in in previous patches. There is a glitterhoof sprite in the left bottom corner its a nice easter egg

[@Soul_Tomato]

Not enough 😔

[@mgel7311]

Wait wait wait... was that age of decadence music randomly put in the middle of the video? Well that sure brought back memories...

[@Kropolis]

A customizable shattered world would be amazing to have back

[@verdantsquire950]

I remember they had sir Bearington as a possible courtier who could show up as a brilliant dnd reference, i miss the lunacy that could turn up.

[@jefferyhanderson7849]

I chortle at the thought of a horse leading the Mongols against the Roman Army.

[@RubberToeYT]

I do hope merchant republics will be soon, but I agree with all of these so much

[@Lost-Mind]

I totally forgot you could request great holy wars and crusaders in CK2. Yeah, I would love College of Cardinals system to return in CK3, I miss the system. I think a religious rework is needed, than look at societies would be a good fit. Ah, I thought viceroyalty system was with Imperial system in CK2 not available with fedual. The coronation systems would be great would be to have in the game again. Would love meechant republics system back and the Silk Road also China system to come back. I could see normands come after trade, and have small event chain for Marco Polo and other explorers on the Silk Road. I could see Asia DLC with Normard et cetera. With the funk, maybe limited to to insane and/or eccentric characters. Glitterhoof was great, the best Chancellor to have so pure and clean from sin.

[@snapwilson316]

Co-sign on all of these, especially societies and the weird stuff like Glitterhoof that made CK2 so much fun. Vanilla CK3 feels so dry, I get two or three rulers in and I feel like the game is just repeating itself. I actually delayed getting CK3 for around six months because I knew so much of what I loved about CK2 was being taken away.

[@assortedfruitcup]

4:47 is that a lunacid ost that I’m hearing? You sir are unfathomably goated with a side of sauce

[@Soul_Tomato]

Yes! I did a review of it on the channel a few months ago actually. I do that sort of thing occasionally.

[@assortedfruitcup]

@@Soul_Tomatowell then I know what I’m going to watch over dinner tonight!

[@victor382]

Coronation is something that is being done in ck3 agot. Hopefully they bring it to the main game.

[@Dungrer]

We don't want Glitterhoof... We NEED Glitterhoof!!!

[@RoseStewart-q5u]

Imo the 2025 expansions should be a core expansion that adds more functionality for the crusades like crusade requests and stuff and events (like we got for the 4th crusade with roads to power) and then the main dlc should add trade routes and trade republics as well as pirates since those all mesh well together and it would double as a reason to play in north africa. Then the flavour pack should maybe be extra events for countries on trade routes or something idk.

[@Soul_Tomato]

I doubt they devote a sole dlc to just crusades tbh. They’re such a small part of the game (even if they shouldnt be) I expect their update would come in concert with a general warfare update.

[@luiscamejo2379]

Retinues! And the visual representation of those retinues

[@Soul_Tomato]

That would be sweet

[@TurtleShroom3]

I too want to see the election of the Pope by the College of Cardinals again, like it did in CK2.

[@philipbrening433]

Regarding societies; you could include medieval guilds and merchant clubs

[@Soul_Tomato]

Very true!

[@philipbrening433]

Could make it easier to recruit camp followers or help give you more/better contracts along with fleshing out your characters story

[@WeDemandGlitterhoof]

Glittehoof if? No, Glitterhoof when? We demand Glitterhoof.

[@Soul_Tomato]

GLITTERHOOF WHEN PARADOX

[@crazyjay2741]

God I wish for the nomads to be distinct like in CK2. One of my favorite government types to play then

[@Soul_Tomato]

Same

[@AsSeenOnScreens]

Has anyone else had Glitterhoof appear on their screen while loading a game? Looks like he/she is having a Grand Wedding if I remember the icon correctly. This has been poping up for me since Roads to Power came out along with some other odd UI artifacts.

[@Soul_Tomato]

Yeah it’s basically just a warning of low ram (only because ck3 is terrible about its ram usage as I have 32gb and it still pops up)

[@avenirxd]

the one thing I want is for prowess have different base values based on gender. Tired of RNG giving me 2 base prowess sons and 9 prowess daughter

[@alexmag200]

I think Glitterhoof might fancy me..

[@benismann]

I dont agree with many things, but 5 and 8 are THE features

[@edmeister4031]

If/when they add China, societies would be amazing. Imagine, CK3 become some kind of Murim Simulation thanks to Landless Gameplay LMAO.

[@CrazyHorse2505]

Admin gov opens the door for China. Adding the rest of the eurasia could be posible.

[@StephanthePelted]

CK3 team 'forgets' that players are going to compare CK3 with CK2. To this day I still dont agree with their stance of not porting game mechanics that are 'going to be reworked anyway' into CK3.. Like what Paradox admitted, it does feel like we are buying an early access game..

[@ChristianGraham-h1y]

Found a mod that lets you play as landless merchants and merchant republic with trade added

[@Soul_Tomato]

Name?

[@somerandomyoutubeuser271]

@@Soul_Tomato Golden Dominion i think

[@ChristianGraham-h1y]

@@Soul_Tomato Gold Dominion

[@WFASPigeonGang]

In need of Sainthood & of a decent bloodline system

[@yourlullaby2381]

i hated that the immortal trait can only be obtained via custom character creator :/

[@RcakInfo]

migration for everyone as it would be fun to migrate to europe as an asian tribe and then get integrated there

[@TheHasder01]

I very much miss some total overhaul of the economics in the game. Nowadays, playing tall is very much in the meta, and by roleplaying a king with high stewardship, you can easily set up the next few generations. That wasn't the case in CK2, you could practically always add something to your domain, besides, you could put a giant building anywhere you wanted, not in game-designated places like in CK3. Plus nowadays it doesn't pays to be a peacekeeper, where in CK2 I remember there was a wealth mechanic that grew with years of peace. It's a shame they've moved away from that, because for me CK2 economically was a much better game than CK3.

[@bigscreenproduction1462]

Noted theres some idea here i can make into a mod the request crusade and the vice royal thing.

[@bigscreenproduction1462]

And coronation these are small enough to be made into a mid size mod. Ill update here if i dont forgot about it.

[@mementomori771]

Society's are neet i really want naval mechanics

[@Soul_Tomato]

Naval could be cool for sure

[@acekoala457]

I need to become worth loving

[@Soul_Tomato]

First step is to love yourself

[@Commandocheif99]

I miss the Satanic Cult lol

[@arkiv7851]

Literally never happening because CK3 is meant to be SIMS: Medieval.

[@Soul_Tomato]

If that were true it would be even wackier - which is what we all want

[@arkiv7851]

@@Soul_Tomato I'm just saying because CK3 has ~6 years left in the dev cycle so the chance of seeing any of these (which was already low) only decreases. 😔

[@ziege3969]

Navy.

[@Soul_Tomato]

I could live without it unless it has trade

[@gavinbarnes4701]

Gliterhoof

[@matthewhoffman9491]

Americanist video when?

[@Soul_Tomato]

Probably never tbh. I moved away from more niche lore except on rare occasions

[@whodis3489]

Improve the combat system and add navies. That's the only thing holding ck3 back from being better than ck2.

[@carnage237]

No mention of great works :(

[@Soul_Tomato]

:( I only had 10

[@mr.crowgamer6250]

Roads of power is okay at best still can't play as a lanless character in a court ect baronys being playable would be nice

[@Soul_Tomato]

IMO thats a wildly reductive take because it adds a lot more to the game than landless

[@mr.crowgamer6250]

@Soul_Tomato fair point lol but still

[@TrajGreekFire]

Inb4 nomad mechanics

[@Soul_Tomato]

I’m sure they’re coming

[@Scoots_McBoots]

Give me societies and more weird shit, plz.

[@Soul_Tomato]

Weird shit city

[@penzorphallos3199]

BTW whatever happened to the jews? They have no content in ck3, besides the 2 events in the iberan struggle dlc....

[@Soul_Tomato]

They added a bunch of Jewish adventurers as historical characters in the last update

[@mateuszslawinski1990]

I noticed that at least in 867 start there's a lot of inspired Jews.

[@danielbauchman5715]

Bring back furries

[@Soul_Tomato]

It’s what the people want