10 Fastest Torpedoes Ever Recorded (2020)

[@macdjord]

MU90: "Speed: 50 knots (92.6km/h)" APR-3e: "Speed: 50 knots (102km/h)" Um...

[@HaydenLau.]

Accurate to two significant figures

[@JamesPhieffer]

This was a complete waste of time. Information of dubious accuracy, and the title refers to recorded speeds, while including an Iranian torpedo that is likely nothing more than a non-functional model, like their "stealth fighter". Spam.

[@MrFlatage]

It is in fact a real and operational torpedo that is out there and it can sink ships. Ofcourse based on Russian technology. We should not take people seriously who believe that some kinda 'stealth fighter' exists. Name an aircraft that cannot be seen on radar? Just one? See now? Does not exist. What does in fact exists can be easily fact checked and proof read from the annual US RAND report comparing all the worlds military capability. kzbin.info/www/bejne/bmTQdY2odt6KmMU Care to explain how as you stated: 'non-functional model' is creating lines in the sea at speeds normal torpedo's do not go? With every naval military ship in the Straight tracking it? Sure the makers of this video do a word for word Wiki copy which is out of date or at times completely false and inaccurate. Proof read from the direct official sources and you would already have known it is not as you say.

[@JamesPhieffer]

@@MrFlatage link to RAND report referred to, please?

[@MrFlatage]

@@JamesPhieffer Wow cannot find US sources? Yea rand.org is very hard to find. ;-) So you see Iran launch one ... after the other if you fact checked the videos out there and you still go into denial? Well at least Russia has been working on their Shkval II which is major feature at Arms Expo's where they are selling it. As you said an aircraft that cannot be seen on radar? Doesn't exist. But sure let's go with the US scientists? fas.org/blogs/secrecy/2008/12/hoot_torpedo/ Casting great doubts on Iran's claim they actually built it themselves and pretending only they and Russia have these. Meanwhile back in the real world built by Diehl BGT Defence, and Altas Elektronik the previously 'top secret' Barracuda travels at over 800km/h, faster than the Shkval, and is fully guided, capable of twisting and turning in on its target at high speed. Unveiled in May at IMDEX 2005 in Singapore the Barracuda has already undergone a whole range of successful tests. The designers of the prototype Barracuda boast that its capabilities are unmatched, claiming the design is 10 years ahead of American research. The Barracuda is maneuverable enough even to home in on, and knock out an incoming Shkval. Water-tunnel tests have already proven that speed can be achieved: In 1997, the Navy tested a supercavitating projectile that reached 5,082 feet per second, becoming the first underwater projectile to exceed Mach 1. Which would be US ONR or Office of Naval Research. Yes in a water-tunnel. You don't want any 'sonic boom' underwater so there are limits unless you want to wipe all marine life in a 100 mile radius. Active sonar works at 140 dB which reaches around 300 miles and is already killing marine life. When a source is named you should have the brains to proof read and fact check. Else you end up making these Wiki videos on KZbin. ;-)

[@bradleymcavoy3432]

@James Phieffer Video said Iranians Tested Prototype of Course based on Russian Shkval. So not a “non-functional model”. Title says Fastest Torpedoes ever Recorded.

[@rerbitd7094]

Join the battle with the Iranian Navy. If you remain alive, then when released from captivity write to us about your impressions.

[@karlwolf9805]

Okay. I just looked up some of these torpedoes out of my own interest, and you literally read word-for-word off the Wikipedia pages. I really don't mind if you use data from them, but come on, put some originality into your presentation. And you don't even cite Wikipedia as a source.

[@karlwolf9805]

Even the video description is just copy-pasted in from the "Torpedo" article on Wikipedia

[@robcluck7469]

Always makes me laugh how there KZbin reporting self-claimed experts think they know the specifications of these top secret weapons. You really think they are releasing top secret information to the public? These figures are as legit as the lotto numbers found in fortune cookies! Major haha

[@grandayatollah5655]

These have been released, or at least most of them

[@kamakaziozzie3038]

Also lots of “claimed” and unverified numbers

[@hansvonmannschaft9062]

Advice: If a video begins with a female in a telemarketer-ish voice setup, or any sort of robot voice, immediatly downvote and trash that tab to save your time. In this case, I only wasted 13 seconds. Cheers.

[@Correction_Guy]

If I could've read this comment sooner...

[@dapperfield595]

Was about to comment that...

[@sudhendugupte7562]

Good video thanks.

[@YRalvarez]

Where is Daniil ''The Torpedo'' Kvyat

[@deathmachineyt3254]

Clearly he's the fastest torpedo. RIP The Torpedos career for now

[@TheWopper78]

On a racetrack somewhere

[@acemax1124]

So the Iran Hoot is just a copy of the Soviet torpedo!

[@Lonewolf-rj2hn]

@troll oracle Bullshit

[@aryazad1]

@@Lonewolf-rj2hn no it's not, look up Toofan anti tank missile,.. well tested and widely used in Syria and Iraq

[@Lonewolf-rj2hn]

@@aryazad1 What about it's fucking perfection??

[@aryazad1]

@@Lonewolf-rj2hn you mean precision?.. look up "Toofan vs VBIED Iraq" or other videos in Syria,.. the latest missile attack on US bases in Iraq showed precision strike capability, which is a big deal to achieve for long range ballistic missiles.. Pentagon is still trying to find out how it was done, they presume Iranian satellites that were launched into orbit few years back seem to have been linked to the missiles achieving pinpoint accuracy,.. now not all of Iranian missiles launched showed that signature, but a few hit their targets dead on, including one that hit a makeshift tent right in the middle, ..pretty eye opening to say the least.

[@juliap.5375]

In 2000 in Russia was caught American spy which tried to steal blueprints of this torpedo.

[@aaranbutton516]

UK spearfish achieved 80 knots in tests but unverified.

[@jamesricker3997]

The US Navy doesn't release the performance for torpedoes in active service.

[@Ad___Astra]

James Ricker like every countries ..

[@grandayatollah5655]

Yes but other countries who have the same torpedoes do

[@JJABRAHAM69]

It would more informative if the propulsion system would also be discuss. Great job!

[@GWRProductions-kg9pt]

you've got that wrong Spearfish has a top speed of 80 kn type 89 54,680yd at 40 kn or 42,650yd at 55kn type 95 9,800 yd 49-51 kn or 13,000 yd at 45-47 kn

[@GWRProductions-kg9pt]

@phil mill did I ask you to get involved?

[@23-kevindillon96]

Where huws torpedo from usa??

[@pierluigiadreani2159]

The Mu 90 is not french it is made by a joint venture which is 50/50 between Italy and france

[@kiefferfx18]

You are right

[@Absaalookemensch]

China and Iran are tied for the fastest stealth torpedo. That travel at 61 gazillion knots, have an effective range of 65,000 km and their conventional warhead will sink every ship in a 183 km radius. They are launched by the Chinese and Iranian stealth submarines that travel at a speed of 863 knots.

[@sajidhaider6722]

Calm down, calm down, you spoiled Iranophobe.

[@smsujit]

😂😂😂

[@MichaelClark-uw7ex]

If you are going to use something as noisy with no active homing as a supercavitating torpedo and give away your position (which kind of defeats the purpose of using submarines and torpedos) you might as well use an ASROC type rocket launched acoustic homing torpedo, you get speed and homing capability. Probably a lot cheaper as well.

[@MichaelClark-uw7ex]

@powerofone1645 That would be even more complex and expensive, plus you would still only get 1 shot before your platform is detected and destroyed.

[@dargaard93]

Are you sure about type 95 speed ? Nowhere is it recorded any of those torps reached more than 57 knots... ??? What are your sources ?

[@arcticdragon104]

The Hoot is a hoot

[@jrippee05]

Where are you getting this info?

[@jachuck4795]

Where is Danil Kvyat

[@ROBBANKS666666]

Years used please for all?

[@cergeil1805]

Большому кораблю, большая торпеда.

[@BoBaH_BoBaHoB]

Быстрому кораблю быстрая торпеда!

[@ФортСталина]

@@BoBaH_BoBaHoB каждому авианосцу по шквалу найдётся

[@hepbhblehot8237]

А большому вертолётоносцу, "хорошего" сварщика)))

[@Fredricful]

Er det til krus skip i nød?

[@RR-us2kp]

I always thought top 10 videos were ridiculous. But if you can't get even simple numbers right, why did you even bother?

[@kiefferfx18]

Where is the French Heavy F21 Artemis Topedo that is the only new heavy torpedo development in the world based on the Black Shark design ? - Dual purpose : anti-submarine & anti-ship - Green & blue water capabilities from 10 m to more than 500 m - High speed and endurance : A terminal velocity of 50 knots at after 57 km - Long-range fibre optic wire guidance - Combined wake/acoustic homing - Countermeasure resistant SafeShqval is not guided and must be fired at less than 5 nm so you are detected and destroyed before you have launch it. Hoot is a joke ill-advise from Shqval Spearfish development began in the 1970s ! Type 95 torpedo was a torpedo used by submarines of the Imperial Japanese Navy during World War II !!! ( LOL ) range was only 9,000 m at 49 kn Type 89 development began in the 1970s ! Range is only 21 nautical miles (39 km) at 55 knots Mk-48 torpedo evelopment began in the 1960s ; Mod 7 version is an improve standard first test fired in 2008 In conclusion, if you face a French nuclear stealth submarine with modern Heavy Topedo F21 , moderne sonar, and modern countermesure Contralto, you are dead ! “There are no silver medals in this game. When facing the enemy, the only option is to be the best and to win,” said Admiral Christophe Prazuck, French Navy chief of staff...When we asked the defence procurement agency (DGA) for the type of boat we need for our missions, we obviously asked for the best. In fact, we asked not only for the best, but for the best over the next 40 years.” www.meretmarine.com/fr/content/focus-frances-next-generation-ssns

[@kiefferfx18]

@@EmperorLionflame Absolutely ridiculous Spearfish torpedo development began in the 1970s, with production starting in 1988, and deployment in 1992 when F21 torpedo development began in the 2008, with production starting in 2013, and deployment in 2016 Read www.popsci.com/story/technology/french-f21-smart-torpedo/ The US, UK, Sweden and Russia use thermal batteries as the energy source for their torpedoes. These batteries “have an advantage in terms of power,” according to Jean-Martin Hepp, BU ASM marketing manager-but need an internal heat source to work and generate heat during operation, making their use “much more risky.” The torpedo becomes more detectable to an enemy using infrared sensors. They are also noisier. “The difference in noise is like the one between a petrol-powered car engine and an electric car engine,”..."As for intelligence: the F21 carries a sonar, which are its eyes and ears. The data gathered is then processed by the tracking management system. “This is where we find the really disruptive technology,” Hepp says. When wire-guided, it allows an operator to see and hear what the F21 is seeing and hearing. But it also allows the F21 to analyze the tactical situation by itself. It can distinguish between a decoy and a real vessel, it can recognize a civilian or friendly ship among a fleet of enemies, and it can avoid all known counter-measures" www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/2018/may-2018-navy-naval-defense-news/6244-f21-artemis-heavyweight-torpedo-successfully-tested-from-french-ssn.html "The F21 torpedo is the world's only new development in the heavy torpedo category. It boasts characteristics that far exceed all other heavy torpedoes currently in service. Over and above its exceptional performance levels, the on-board tactical intelligence makes this torpedo a precursor for what the underwater drones of tomorrow could be"

[@kiefferfx18]

@@EmperorLionflame Astute ckass is 11 years oldfashioned than Suffren-class, Astute sonar is French Thales www.opex360.com/2020/03/01/thales-embarque-a-bord-des-futurs-sous-marins-nucleaires-lanceurs-dengins-de-la-royal-navy/ when Suffren-class get new Thales UMS-3000, the last version of S-CUBE launched from 2006 www.thalesgroup.com/en/worldwide/defence/s-cube-integrated-submarine-sonar-suite

[@kiefferfx18]

@@EmperorLionflame the sonar of Astute is a french Sonar of the same company Thales with the same technology ! It is not important to fire the first one if your torpedo is easier to jam and generate so much noise that your location is instantly detected with precision. The first boat, Astute, was laid down on 31 January 2001 the year of the Suffren-class design start, and laid down in 2007, 6 years latter day than Astute-class. Suffren have been build by France alone when UK call for help USA, General Dynamics Electric Boat employee became the Astute Project Director !

[@kiefferfx18]

@@EmperorLionflame Thales Group is a french company, headquarters are in Paris La Défense, and its stock is listed on the Euronext Paris. Thales UK is the largest subsidiaries outside France but it is a subsidiary. As for Astute and Barracuda systems... Sonar suites: Astute = Contract 2076 previous to 1996: Upgrade = Inboard processing equipment Oct 2006. Barracuda = Thales UMS 3000 contract at Euronaval 2006. Combat system: Astute = Integrated Tactical Weapon system (TWS) contract 1996. Barracuda = SYCOBS derivated from that developed for the SNLE No4 S619 (LE TERRIBLE) contracted 28 juillet 2000, system still in developement from 2006. Communications: Astute = Link 16. Barracuda = Link 16, Link 21, SATCOM (Syracuse 3). So to summerise: Astute comms and systems, TWS/Sonar 2076 are dated from two technology generations previous to Barracuda feasability contracts passed by DGA.

[@Bolinho21Games]

"i don't give a hoot"

[@TacticalReindeer]

yes Nuclear-powered Nuclear-armed torpedo

[@LoffysDomain]

Tip, sit closer to mic, to capture less of tge room's reverberation.

[@neoneo15556]

JP Torpedo No.9 ×MARK93→Type93（1） (1933.36kt 40000m、48kt.20000m）　 Type93（3） (1933.36kt.30000m、48kt.15000m) MAX 52kt No.3 Type95 (1935.45kt.12000m、49kt.9000m) MAX 50kt? No.4 Type89 (1989.55kt.39000m、40kt.50000m) MAX 70kt (imformal)

[@acer8123]

Burgerking foot lettuce sounding ass.

[@Андрей-г9ц8о]

фоты давай

[@tomlee2651]

What a Hoot !! Hoot, hoot !

[@hessambahrami3217]

Hoot means a famous historical big fish In Islamic believes:)

[@seyedrozbehsiros4386]

This missile is related to Iran 14 years ago !!! kzbin.info/www/bejne/jommoXeBZ7OEf6M

[@LorenzoDeRossiProf]

(You seem to have a voice similar to Jenny Elle's)

[@phamxuantrung7104]

Her voice is so beautiful.

[@ruchirrai]

Thanks, she's my wife.

[@franzbauer7687]

In this list I miss the Barrakuda torpedo, it is also a supercavitating torpedo of the german navy.

[@basargaloran7998]

Barrakuda has not gone into production.

[@panditthanos9856]

Everyone is torpedo untill real torpedo comes"🇮🇳smart torpedo 🇮🇳 of indian neavy range of more than 650km(600+50) km

[@mrpotatohasabanana]

Bhai abhi bohat sare mamle mein piche hai, ek chez pe garv Hona hai to dus chez pe sharm Hona hai humko

[@vikrantkothavale8291]

@@mrpotatohasabanana tum jese logon ko hamesha takleef hogi chahe desh ko kitni bhi safalta prapt ho.

[@mrpotatohasabanana]

@@vikrantkothavale8291 tum log Jo ek chez pe chati peet te ho har ek video ke neeche Uske opposite koi hamari khamiyan nikalne lage to Rona shuru karte ho

[@vikrantkothavale8291]

@@mrpotatohasabanana abhi tumne bhi vhi kiya tha

[@mrpotatohasabanana]

@@vikrantkothavale8291 Kahan Kiya, use bol Raha tha

[@artyparis]

Iran ?

[@Sam_Rao_23]

Ok, but where the heck is Daniil Kvyat?

[@noviranger88]

I think he was faster on the Azerbaijan straight than any of these torpedoes.

[@simonemongittu8597]

Sorry but the MU90 is made by Eurotorp headquartered in Italy. So is more Italian than French.

[@justinhawes5193]

Where is the mark 48?

[@David-jv3dw]

I can knts has been confused with kmh Type 95 and presume similar issues apply to other data.

[@lissettelopez8331]

Russia once claimed it had a torpedo that could go Mach1. 🙄

[@valenrn8657]

Australia has Mark 48 Mod 7 CBASS and Mark 54 besides MU90 Impact

[@artemsuetin6821]

Yeah I was going to say Mark 48 too, although there is a range/speed trade off .

[@The_CrackedPot_Christian]

I wonder if they have ever developed a torpedo with a vast range, say 500km+? That way it can just troll the enemy all day and they dare not move close to it.

[@daveybernard1056]

Russian Poseidon nuclear doomsday cobalt torpedo does this.

[@macbolan9374]

Are you talking level speed only? Air and surface-launched ASW torpedoes had negative bouyancy so they accelerate as they dive, reaching as much as 120 knots.

[@wiseguy3696]

I think they're talking about its own propulsion

[@ИванБогданов-ч6п]

Это иранская копия шквала?

[@BoBaH_BoBaHoB]

Копия Шквала-Э. Кастрированный по дальности экспортный вариант.

[@altafufidellagherarbastian6783]

Mu 90 Italy France joint venture

[@jborreggine8759]

Exactly. But typical Anti-Italian propaganda refuses to acknowledge Italian contributions.

[@silverpleb2128]

@@jborreggine8759 There is no Anti-Italian propaganda, stop dreaming. This is just a mistake, a lot more are made in every videos, concerning every nations.

[@veidorje1681]

how about M.H.D torpedo :)

[@yannischupin7787]

Why mentioning this poor MU90 impact when we are actually using F21 which have the same speed AND is 10 times heavier...

[@kiefferfx18]

MU-90 is a light torpedo fired from aircraft or hélicopter. The most up-to-date in the world, able to destroy any submarine at a 1000m depht. You can't do that with any other Torpedo

[@mariannepompa4152]

@@kiefferfx18 New submarines have to be found first.

[@K877]

Mark 93 why? Type 93

[@dr.nandishpurli4074]

Well if these weapons just able to protect it's tectonic territories that's just the job well done

[@Flying-spaghetto]

Where is the F21 ???

[@valifort108]

F21 TORPEDO IS THE BEST

[@Helldemon02]

You forgot the Barracuda en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superkavitierender_Unterwasserlaufk%C3%B6rper

[@s.31.l50]

Nah the fastest torp is clearly Halland with torp acceleration and torp mod1

[@andreasdirlich8135]

Daran haben die Deutschen schon im zweiten Weltkrieg gearbeitet! Einen Torpedo in einer Luftblase schneller durch Wasser zu schiessen und wo ist eigentlich der deutsche Hochgeschwindigkeitstorpedo ? Ich glaube der heißt Barrakuda ?!

[@mariannepompa4152]

Wurde 2005 als Versuchsmuster der Öffentlichkeit vorgestellt, es kam jedoch nicht zur Serienentwicklung und Beschaffung. Das System wär mit der sowjetischen Schkwal aus dem Jahr 1977 vergleichbar.

[@cergeil1805]

Посейдон тоже торпеда, скорость 200км

[@eldarsafarov2499]

Ебана я пчёлка Майя про посейдон и знать не знает! 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

[@Putins-mustache]

в шары долбимся 0:22

[@ГошаАрматов-з2р]

@@eldarsafarov2499 Да знают они про торпеду « Посейдон » . Просто считают , что она не торпеда , а необитаемая подводная лодка с большой атомной бомбой

[@dimitriig]

"Посейдон" относится к классу малых беспилотных подводных аппаратов и не может запускаться через торпедный отсек подводной лодки из-за деаметра сильно превышающего классические торпеды.

[@ГошаАрматов-з2р]

@@dimitriig любую торпеду можно отнести к малым беспилотным подводным аппаратам . « Посейдон » к тому же , это ядерная торпеда

[@RLS_Basmati_f1]

Kvyat is fastest torpedo in the world.😂He only needs rockets on his car and his fastest.

[@RU-zm7wj]

?

[@Talysh.ir22]

🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷🇮🇷 love from Iran

[@sangfong206]

lol the waters “ sur-FACE “

[@justit1074]

Wait is type 95 ww2 era torp?

[@GWRProductions-kg9pt]

it is

[@jakobming4831]

The long lance im guessing

[@nadlisse9055]

"mark 93"

[@iakovoskin659]

Buzz, you forgot to mention German made "Superkavitierender Unterwasserlaufkörper";)

[@josephking6515]

By the time you can say _FIRE the Superkavitierender Unterwasserlaufkörpe_ the target will be out of range. 😀

[@aranbenjo2695]

Iran torpedo is skval russia

[@binaway]

I would doubt the top speed of most modern torpedoes have been revealed. The last 2 are air speed. What is their maximum submerged speed?

[@MrDescream]

It is a submerged speed, just google how shkval torpedo work

[@grandayatollah5655]

It's not air speed, Russian shkval and Iranian Hoot are supercavitating

[@alfalahcargo1688]

where is the king in this section

[@derpinbird1180]

Sir-Face

[@kimmadsen5341]

You forgot the mk 48!!! It explodes under a ship. And breaks in half!

[@eccosabanovic1589]

Effective range 40km? Really?

[@BoBaH_BoBaHoB]

Type 65 (Russia) 50km. Spearfish (UK) 54km (claimed).

[@7macfly2]

mistake with the type 95 Its 91 km/h not knots plus its a ww2 torpedo, no way it get to 91 kts

[@bestamerica]

' ussr russia and iran are the best secret friendships and shares secret arms weapons

[@gawan7279]

Great Moore for The Buzz 👍👍👍👍, can you make comtent about Most Powerful or Longest Range and Fastest Speed Coastal Defence Missile for Russia and USA

[@dominien6487]

This sounds like a Lebanon accent

[@joesalazar3656]

The real deal shit is kept a secret. We don't know shit

[@piotrd.4850]

Type 95 mod 2 could clock about 87 kph....

[@monarasouli9889]

well, you said the truth once... You never mention Iran(e.g. Air Defence Systems), doesn't your financial sponsor let you do that?

[@teslafan9875]

Please leave the bottle this video is a real fake... Iranian torpedoes ahahaha Moreover, torpedo MU 90 is produced by EuroTorp, an Italian-French consortium and it is based on the italian torpedo MU84...and in the list where is the lethal WASS Black Shark Advanced? mmmmmhhh

[@Will_CH1]

Unlike the Qaher F313, the Iranian hoot torpedo may be a real weapon. But development. I think that they made Hoot badge and affixed it withhigh tech Iranian glue over the Shkval logo.

[@basargaloran7998]

Most likely, this is an export version of the Shkval, the production of which was established in Iran.

[@MrWhiskers65]

Is the Iranian torpedo a creation from the same gang who developed the 5th generation Iranian stealth fighter? 😂

[@timothymarchant9079]

Was thinking the exact same thing. Iran's stealth fighter. So stealthy it doesn't appear to actually exist. 😁

[@jborreggine8759]

Everything Iran says they make is actually non-functioning plastic.

[@nurashams4093]

m.kzbin.info/www/bejne/aojMYWR8n8d2e5Y

[@alessandrocolombero1881]

Il museo 90 impat non è francese è italiano

[@AbhishekRaj-hi4lh]

VarunAstra 🎆

[@vovaivanov2059]

LoL where is german superkavitierender Unterwasserlaufkörper with 200 knots?

[@BoBaH_BoBaHoB]

It is a rumor.

[@көрбүөччүуолатүргэн]

а где мк-48

[@iakovoskin659]

Number 1 and 2 (shkval and hoot) have the same problem of short firing range. The radars are able to pick up submarines at 20 km and more.

[@15425rfggdfc]

Сплошные проблемы, и ты о них всё всё знаешь.

[@waynesimpson2074]

Sonars not radars? Yup, too quick and inaccurate to be consistently, successfully guided onto target but worst of all; too noisy. The large acoustic signature of the super-cavitating steam gives away it's launch position origins and therefore the sub's location. Scary rapid though.

[@iakovoskin659]

@@waynesimpson2074 You are right. Sonars. I think that low flying missiles are better than torpedoes. Brahmos is much harder to intercept.

[@waynesimpson2074]

@@iakovoskin659 Aye, missiles are King, the Exocet that finished HMS Sheffield in the Falklands never even detonated its warhead...all that damage was simply from the rocket motor trapped inside the superstructure.

[@wiseguy3696]

The idea is the M-5 has a nuclear warhead and is unavoidable. There are no known countermeasures to supercavitating torpedoes. Both Russian and Chinese submarines have proven that they are able to get within 2 nmi of carriers while avoiding detection.

[@shawn97006]

WWAAAYYY off on the Spearfish.

[@user-of3gq3bx8h]

한국의 국기가 맞지않습니다. 영상에 한국 국기는 1945년에 쓰던 국기입니다

[@neerudu1]

Fake data.

[@tamer1773]

The problem with super cavitating torpedoes is that they are very noisy, easily tracked and are susceptible to anti-torpedo measures. That noise also makes it almost impossible to use acoustic homing on the target. In addition they're great at going straight ahead, but like the big V-8 powered "lead sleds' that Detroit was putting out in the 60's and 70's they don't do well in those pesky turns. That makes them susceptible to evasive action. When the technology is mastered they may very well be a game changer in the future, but every weapon is a problem for which a solution is usually found, albeit not necessarily in time. Witness the measures and counter measures that Britain and the U.S. used against the Germans and the Germans used against the Allies in WWll.

[@dhanrajchavan1737]

India's varunastra

[@ViperBenchmarks]

next time add year

[@michaelpieczynski9340]

Waste of my time. I knew all this inaccurate information already by heart.

[@TillyOrifice]

Really? Why?

[@florinvadan7876]

Somali???

[@multifunktionsnutzvieh]

Es gibt noch sehr sehr viel schnellere!

[@bobkohl6779]

Horrible narration, someone not really interested in the subject trying to sound really important on a subject they really have no interest in. And thank you so much for letting me know a channel I really have no interest in

[@magusalakcristituto449]

so USA has none modern torpedo? hahaha sad,,x99 sonar breaker classified and plasma hyper pulse beam is good anti submarine

[@flatmoonsociety9933]

Jesus Christ is Lord

[@funkmetal]

Its funny that every single one of these videos has russian equipment at #1, wonder why?

[@jomo3564]

Russians have recently shown their new weapons (mostly missiles and torpedos) to gain respect. USA kept their weapons secrets and don't have to show off anymore like in soviet times. Russians are very competitive in missiles and torpedos though. It's part of their asymmetric weapons programs to keep a leverage cause they can't compete in the full scale with USA and tomorrow with China.

[@soap_off]

Because Shkval is the fastest that's why :)

[@shahzproductionssp167]

Russia is greatest in world's.!

[@chuckbowen4334]

Let's see, how did russian military equipment perform in the gulf war? Not so well. Their tanks poped open like cheap tin cans when our tanks hit them. The russian airplanes made huge black spots on the desert floor. Oh, and how many Russian submarine accidents that cost russian sailors their lives? So, the russian military machine is mostly out dated garbage from the 1960's?? Thought so.

[@kikiarmada1773]

@@chuckbowen4334 lol New American weapon VS old t55 and t72s,in gulf war, is that even posible to compare?? Its like fighting New t90 VS old m46 and m48 patons.. They never atack New weopen system in Iraq, only 20,30years old eqipment

[@basargaloran7998]

@@chuckbowen4334 I remember how the Serbs with the old Soviet S-125 from the 60s shot down the newest "invisible" F-117. A weapon is just a means. More important are the people who use it.

[@fabrizio6673]

Come sempre, anche in questo caso la Russia è più forte di tutti.

[@Sandhoeflyerhome]

Spear-fish..... not Spare-fish.... this video is rubbish

[@көрбүөччүуолатүргэн]

значит японская лучше и быстрый и дальнебойный

[@ГошаАрматов-з2р]

С каких это пор « Шквал » стал японцем ?

[@көрбүөччүуолатүргэн]

@@ГошаАрматов-з2р Да разве? кто сказал дай ему в глаз

[@ГошаАрматов-з2р]

@@көрбүөччүуолатүргэн так ты же сказал что япошка быстрый и лучше

[@көрбүөччүуолатүргэн]

@@ГошаАрматов-з2р Я сказал быстрый и дальнебойный. Это ТҮРЕ 95 - 40 км дальность, 168 км/ч и так же ТҮРЕ 89 - 50 км дальность, и 130 км/ч. А твой ШКВАЛ летит как балванка дальность всего 15 км, не управляем хотя и быстр за счёт ковалькации 370 км/ч может потерять свою траекторию полёта итогом чего стал КУРСК

[@ГошаАрматов-з2р]

@@көрбүөччүуолатүргэн итогом гибили Курска стала торпеда « Кит »65 - 76 ПВ , которая снаряжалась перекисью водорода , что и послужило трагедией .