10 Flat Earth Arguments DEBUNKED

[@CaseyShontz]

Climate change can be easily solved! Let’s just flip the Earth over, like the cool side of the pillow

[@silverwolfmonastery]

clever

[@Olwwolf]

Daaaaaaamn 😱

[@cascas9656]

What if the sun is the head of god and cause our zise we can see the infra red light that is coming from god and warming us😯

[@PopCanimated]

Cas Cas What?

[@cascas9656]

@@PopCanimated I got really bored.

[@Wildcopper]

A scientist is a man who will read thousands of books in his life and still realize how little he knows. A religious man will only read one single book and believe he knows everything.

[@anlemon817]

Wildcopper how true

[@KrasszTV]

The funny thing is that flat-earthers aren't even religious. They re-iterate psuedoscience.

[@karame463]

Krassz ah, it they are. The vast majority of them, anyway. Their desire to believe the Earth is flat comes from their desire for the Bible to be true. The Bible has been shown to not align with what we know about the world time and time again, so they are trying to fix that (at least for one topic) be "proving" the Earth is flat. The problem is that they cannot prove that which is not true.

[@beaconrider]

Sort of reminds me of my favorite bible thumper, Ken Ham. He announces right at the beginning of any debate that he will not accept any evidence that contradicts the bible.

[@daisylewis664]

wasn't there like sixty something books? I'm sure there was.

[@1999jassim]

Flat earthers are located all around the globe.

[@czarlito_]

Nice one.

[@kioskman5747]

yes of course and some of them they walking upside down and just didn't feel it cause the earth is big lol.

[@johnnyboy5976]

Earths magnets help.

[@kioskman5747]

help in what? to don't understud that they walk upside down??

[@louistournas120]

+Johnny Boy: "Earths magnets help." ==Earth magnets? Are you stupid?

[@mightymartin4854]

The flat earth joke should have died in the Renaissance.

[@swordablaze9259]

The joke should fall flat.

[@killme2675]

It should've died when the Ancient Greeks found out that the Earth was round.

[@rodriguezthiago318]

You could say the same about the religion thing

[@larrypoopstein9509]

I wonder what's on the B side of Earth..

[@perrap79]

Larry Poopstein a better version of ourselves and its actually the A-side. Were the B-side. 😁

[@Silverwind87]

Could it be? The upside-down?

[@valeriepaulsen5236]

That sir is quite clever, you're welcome.

[@theprinceofbrazil]

Chocolate land.

[@Heliocentric]

Earth, the extended remix

[@kyle857]

The Earth was proven to be a sphere 2,300 years ago... How are we going backwards.?

[@Pipemonkey]

Just Some Guy Ok wrong it was 500 years ago this globe myth started, flat earth maps have been drawn for thousands of years

[@kyle857]

Someone should tell Pythagoras...

[@defaultuser9423]

of course maps are 2 d projections. They are supposed to be flat. But you are right. A lot of people until the modern era did believe the earth was flat although Greek thinkers had it figured out 2500 years ago.

[@DeaconShadow]

These people, these paranoid conspiracy religious fundamentalist lunatics, have always been with us. But now, a global nearly instant communications network allows then to seek each other out an present an influence all out of proportion to their actual numbers.

[@AnmlPeeweeIsHere]

gary calcroft well, I guess the Greeks didn't begin to theorize this before...

[@luckyjohny181]

"The flat earth society has members all across the globe" hilarious!

[@canatowtu7823]

Trump got voted in, equally hilarious

[@Miriam_J_]

Canatowtu You're a kind of way too late to use that joke. Even a month ago that joke was irrelevant.

[@Miriam_J_]

***** What?

[@coolfloyd6113]

He was just saying the joke was old, he didn't imply a position.

[@Miriam_J_]

***** Ok? All I did was say that hes really, really late to make that joke. Memes don't even last 4 months, how would a Trump joke last that long

[@raddish3738]

I told my mom about the Flat Earth Society and she laughed and dropped her yogurt.

[@minnowviewbait]

talk about bad hair day -LoLs even with uglyazz white bkgnd still Id ROFLMFFAOff -RolledOnFloorLaughinMyFlatFloatinAzzOff +i'll bet she had a spherical BALL huh ?

[@pillsburydoughboy1627]

@@salamjihad3449 are you 6

[@bindaredundat-uv6wz]

@@pillsburydoughboy1627 LOL SIX INCHES OF LOVE MUSCLE !!!!!!!! LMAO !!!!!

[@flatearth9140]

@@pillsburydoughboy1627 i have another six inches over here too ...lmao .

[@glenncater1]

@@pillsburydoughboy1627 when your mom is done over there i have another 6 inces here boy !!!!!!!!

[@MassiveChetBakerFan]

If Earth were a globe, then surely it would roll off the back of the giant turtle that supports it.

[@ARBB1]

Obviously, the dolphins wouldn't be able to support it.

[@dalailarose1596]

It's turtles all the way down!

[@redrumthebum]

😆😆😂

[@1369Stiles]

cant even believe we are having this discussion at this time in our history. its sad af

[@freecommander]

Yeah, man. Really? Seriously? How? The new religion "the new world order" can't be argued with. We just say yes to everything. It is freedom, right? Freedom to say "Roger" to everything they tell us. Man How can we argue with them? Really, they are allowed to make assumptions "theories" and We all Have to believe them. It is freedom, that's they real application of it. Man! thank you for clearing this out for everyone.

[@archyneverpicked]

+Mohammed Jasim you don't need to be a yes man to authority to realise that the earth is round

[@1369Stiles]

first, thats an idiotic argument. second, you really should learn the difference between the definition of the general use of "theory" and the scientific use of "theory". they mean two completely different things.

[@stevenblackburn1523]

1369Stiles CosmicSkeptic I too am a skeptic. I question everything. Religion is derived from astrotheology the worship of the cosmos. I have a question. You say the earth is so big that even at 73 miles high we still wouldnt really see the curvature. Then why is it in Nasa and others videos with ballons and clips like red bull the earth appears to be curved but then is fish eyed? hmm. lol think about whats happening Also I noticed saturn is your symbol. All religion goes back to the cube the 2 equilteral triangles oF SATURN. SATURN is the root to all of what humans knows as religous words and symbolism now either your way smarter than you let on or this is by chance I feel as though you may be a freemason and are working at what degree i dont know I believe the earth to be flat. Why else do the rulers of earth use flat earth maps. The ancients were not stupid we are just mimicing what they have already taught. we call it RE.search as is already been found we are jus reawakenin

[@archyneverpicked]

Steven, can you explain lunar eclipses and why flights between continents don't take 3 times as long and don't go over land?

[@Shorey]

How do you deal with people who don't accept evidence within an argument?

[@SHISHKABOB214]

Shorey you cry

[@kumaclimber]

Shorey don't engage and walk away.

[@stickers11]

You feel bad for them and question their livelyhood

[@Timg95]

You utilize their own presuppositions against them.

[@Akira625]

Ignore them, they're a lost cause.

[@aaronveneruso2214]

Flat earthers: the Revenge of Who got F on science. Nice video :)

[@Davros539]

Omg this was briliant!

[@mmmmmmok5292]

F f FFFFlat earther who got FFFFF in geography class

[@444Deliverance]

globe earthers: spastics who cant think for themselves

[@mattsmith87]

globe earthers: spastics who cant think for themselves Flat earthers: People who cannot understand simple maths and whose brains are incapable of (even remotely) comprehending the actual size of our solar system, (never mind the galaxy or heaven forbid, the universe).

[@444Deliverance]

matt smith the sheer size of everything yeah? and you are what absoutley nothing a tiny meaningless being. can you conceptualize realistically on the other side of the globe directly beneath you sky scrapers and people compeltley upside down from where you are now? try and actually comprehend that. i honestly think there should be some sort of video footage able of proving thats the case, which there isnt and cant be. we have all been taught the same shit, its just a matter of stepping back from it and thinking about it

[@variousnumber891]

So... Have these Flat Earthers actually got prove of the great Ice Wall?

[@chloeb370]

Variousnumber No because "NASA" won't let them lmao. As if NASA is the only space agency.

[@jackhenderson1039]

Ambitionz Actually they say that the UN is running a fleet of ~10,000(I think) ships patrolling the southern ocean.

[@Missmary852]

Variousnumber their proof is that noone can go there.

[@variousnumber891]

And they wonder why everyone laughs at them...

[@Missmary852]

Variousnumber my brother is a flat earther. 😑 cant really disagree with him cause hell start shouting.

[@aidanjt]

When Robert Simmon said "It is photoshopped, but it has to be...", that crucial bit of context our flattard deliberately left out was what he would obviously say after that, is because space telescopes don't have a bayer filter that's just slapped on top of the CCD as used in your typical consumer and professional cameras, but rather robotically swappable colour filters that allows for extremely high scientific quality discrete colour channels in all the frequency bands of interest, not just red, green, and blue, those channels then have to be processed to produce a colour image that's within our visual range (and indeed, wont be dropped by the jpeg codec), and that the intensity doesn't wash out the final image, like say, an image of the Sun.

WHEN he said that , over 30 years ago, it was technically true. but those flat-earther idiots claim that quote proves every single picture NASA has EVER made is fake...crazy!

[@DeaconShadow]

aidanjt Hey thanks for that. Great point. Cameras in space are not directly comparable to an off the shelf digital camera and the images they produce are much more specific in nature.

[@xXxmajikmanxXx]

It's sad to think that we've come to this, you shouldn't have to explain this

[@dabbingood2930]

No what is sad is we have been lied to and deceived our whole lives..

[@ghostcode829]

Dabbin Good never mentioned anything about flat earth. And school is indoctrination...

[@hareecionelson5875]

Did the Ancient Greeks learn spherical Earth in schools, or did they gather evidence in the the real world by observing ships and the shadows of rods in Egypt and Syria in 250 BC?

[@ebot1000]

It is truly sad. Regular person: "show me evidence the earth is flat" Flat-earther: *pulls up youtube video*

[@nextlevel4060]

Dabbin Good no what is sad is we been brainwashed not lied to instead of seeing for ourselfs

[@williambacker6581]

im a navy vet and a radar tech i can assure you the earth is round. other wise with a telescope you could see France from Norfolk VA.

[@soloist2001]

William Backer the reason u can't see clear across the ocean has nothing to do with earth curve, the atmosphere is filled with gas, the air we breath, eather, water vapor, dust particles, etc...etc...over miles and miles the visibility through air drops to zero, regardless of magnification.

[@theCoffinSeller]

Garett Macera This is insane. For real why do we have sunrises? Not your shrinking sun bullshit. The sun doesn't shrink. Get yourself a piece of dark glass and watch. And why do we have two celestial poles in the sky? That'd be impossible on a flat earth. But of course you won't answer. You guys never answer.

[@soloist2001]

theCoffinSeller not sure about why you've responded in this manner..i simply pointed out to the poster that the reason we cant see hundreds / thousands in one direction along the surface is because atmospheric conditions prevent it, not directly due to the curvature of earth...also since u mention it, i have seen multiple time lapse videos of the sun "getting smaller" at sunset, so u may go argue with other you tube channels on that. u have no idea who I am, and yet u are immediately willing to make a psychological determination about my sanity based on a few sentences.....do u always get this defensive when someone presents an idea that contradicts the dogmatic beliefs that modern science has "figured it all out"? I dont presume to know the answers to all the questions...but I sure as he'll dont just take "their word for it"

[@theCoffinSeller]

Garett Macera You saw videos with a time lapse - I challenge you to get yourself a piece of dark gpass and watch it yourself. The sun does not shrink. You do take everithing for granted because you do not challenge your own contradictory beliefs. Why do we observe two celestial poles? Why do we have sunsets? Challenge yourself!

[@soloist2001]

theCoffinSeller for the sake of your retinas I wouldn't suggest staring at the sun for hours to watch the suns movement if u are simply using some "dark glass"...u need to filter over 99% of the suns light to be safe...welders mask would suffice for a short time...i am certainly willing to test these assumptions myself

[@Snardvark25]

What do we have to gain... for lying about this.

[@7Pagod]

@Max Fritze Well it'll depend on which model of flat earth is the correct one (I'm not saying that any of them are right, I'm just answering the question.) 1) If the world is in a dome then it probably means something intelligent put it there. (aliens, god, I dunno.) 2) If the earth is motionless and the universe revolves around it, humans go from being unimportant specs of dust in the cosmos to being super duper important (since everything literally revolves around them.) 3) If there's an infinite stretch of ice past antarctica instead of a dome then maybe there's more "worlds" out there, buried in their own ice holes. qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-c57828dc26b550ee91a3cc9ab42796a9

[@gomiladroogies5951]

7Pagod #3 would be a great plot for a movie

[@Silverwind87]

Globe manufacturers make more money. That's it. That's the only reason.

[@legendshighlights1969]

Albert Nave makes more money????

[@sosagrizz2103]

Max Fritze they can hide land and do dirty work

[@jemima885ify]

Your reaction when he says “the science religion” kills me everytime

[@cloudpuffer224]

If earth was flat my cat would have knocked everything off the edge by now.

[@rager5865]

Copy paste, my old friend...

[@brandonlee9747]

Connieandblyde there is no 'EDGE' its merely an ICE WALL.

[@GenDrake3]

Lapras use ICE BEAM!!!!

[@charleysturbos7320]

Funny but as Ello above says their is a ice shelf and a continent called Antarctica which is land holding the get this"SEA LEVEL" . Explain how we are a sphere at 24901 miles and eight inches curved for every mile sqaured but their is absolutely no curve from say cali to florida or anywhere you ask google to calculate. And you cannot observe any curve as well. Builders dont build to the curve either. Gravity is only density and boyancy , simple as that. Don't need seven books of theorys that never add up to tell us this. So the earth spins 1000 miles plus an hours west to east with the atmosphere but a little stupid bee or bug says na , i think ill go against the atmosphere and gravity today to eat. Or clouds going different dirrections at same time. Or a little bird flying when trillions of curved ocean water on a spinning globe upside down is held but the bird says screw you today gravity im flying. Where is the pictures of upside down curved ocean and people and buildings with these ten thousand plus satellites ? Don't you think that would be amazing stuff to see. Or say when they take the moon or earth pictures. Where the heck is all the space junk by the millions and the satalites by the ten thousands. All you see is one CGI SAtelite at a time. It goes on and on and on when you look into it. This isn't counting the fake moon landing, Hitlers scientists starting NASA, all the fake education and indoctrination going on. It gets deep. All of this is too make us dependent on scienctists , exactely like doctors and our f'd up medical crises with sheeple that depend on these guys and trust them are dying by the millions. And people like us that use our brains come up with natural ways to cure cancers and diabetes and tons of other diseases to save our friends and families daily. Wake up sheeeeeeeeeplllllllllle. Please, its too hard fighting Cognitive Dissonance . All we want to do is help people see the truth and that damn near everything they say and do is a lie for money.

[@GenDrake3]

charleysturbos lol what was your major in college?

[@xy1374]

If the earth was shaped like a disc, wouldn't the value of gravitational acceleration increase enormously as we approach close to the center of mass of the disc?

[@randomerpersoner]

x y apparently, Flat-Earthers (whatever their group name is) don't believe in gravitational pull.

[@xy1374]

Random Person So do they have any other explanation for the phenomenon of pull towards the earth?

[@randomerpersoner]

x y i would bet they _do_ have the answers but it may not make any sense to not-Flat-Earthers. I don't know.

[@noahearthlingmusic]

If the earth was flat the closer you got to the edge, the harder it would be to walk forward.

[@pranayr9284]

They think Gravity is a myth. Some flat earthers say, it is weight, and some FE say it is buoyancy, which is the cause for we sticking towards the earth. But they won't understand that the formula for Weight is Mass × *gravity* and for buoyancy is density × volume × *gravity* Lol

[@trg1408]

*The Earth is Flat* Flat out a sphere, duh.....

[@kennatco7916]

The Earth is not flat. It's fat!

[@sundayschoolflunkie3979]

-channels inner Jordan Peterson- Well, that of course depends on how you define flat.

[@vroomvrommgrrr6950]

@fynes leigh Shut the fuck up, you don't even exist!!!

[@HarpMime452]

I remember as a child reading about the Hollow Earth Theory, and thinking "what a good fairytale" until I realized there are people whose believe in this kind of theories!!

[@mousebiteslover69]

Marcelo Volkov the hollow earth thing is impossible, it would make the earth’s magnetic field disappear because of the core’s absence. though that would make a good fairytale, i agree!

[@transsnack]

@Jesse Hoffman If there were a white dwarf in the center of the Earth, I'm pretty sure the radiation alone would have been enough to prevent life, as it is today, from forming on Earth. Also, how would anything like a planet form around it? I'm not attacking you, I'm just genuinely curious..

[@backatit4757]

@@mousebiteslover69 How do you know that there is a core?

[@KenPotter]

Easiest way to prove/disprove flat-earth: "star exposure photography". Above the North Pole - circle; above equator - sweeps straight across; What about southern hemisphere? If it looks like the north-pole circles, then the flat-earth model fails.

[@MayIPleaseAskYou]

Ken Potter may I please ask you to help me answer this question When you go up in a hot air balloon and spend an hour in the air, how far away from the take off point are you likely to be, given the spin of the earth? 🌏 Thank you 👩🏻‍💻 From Virgin Hot Air Balloon Flight How far will we fly? Hot air balloons can’t be steered in the normal sense so they travel on the wind with skilled pilot’s controlling the altitude by heating the air inside the balloon. How far you’ll fly depends on the wind speed. It also depends on how long it takes the pilot to find a suitable landing spot. You could fly a relatively short distance or as far as 20 miles. www.virginballoonflights.co.uk/faq/

[@GaijinMecha]

it's fucking insane... literally a simple camera and a few hours. This is dunning Kreuger at work

[@rayopeongo]

+MayIPleaseAskYou "When you go up in a hot air balloon and spend an hour in the air, how far away from the take off point are you likely to be, given the spin of the earth?" The spin of the earth will have almost nothing to do with how far you travel and in which direction. The local weather in your area will have a much bigger effect. The only effect that the spin of the earth has is that the Coriolis effect caused by the earth's spin does cause weather systems to generally move in certain directions at certain latitudes, but the winds in those weather systems, your position relative to them and the relative strengths of those weather systems will have much more effect on your movement. For instance, the Coriolis effect causes high pressure systems in the northern hemisphere to spin clockwise. So, if you are north of the center of the high pressure system, you will probably move east. If you are east of the center, you will probably move south. If you are south of the center, you will probably move west. If you are west of the center, you will probably move north. If you are dead center, you will experience calm winds and won't move too much at all.

[@ianmcneely2446]

Ken Potter No, the easiest way is to walk away from a tall building.

[@cryptojihadi265]

Exactly, as an astrophotgrapher the FE model fails massively. Even in the northern hemisphere a German Equatorial mount wouldn't work, but in the southern hemisphere it's ridiculously obvious. Just about everything that happens in the southern hemisphere disproves the disc model, including flight times and directions.

[@FaceStation]

"If you understand basic astrology" ...when arguing with flat earthers....I'm not sure you can grant that premise.

[@clownworldhereticmyron1018]

...you mean astronomy, right?

[@conbonnor]

Something I seriously don't understand about flat earths: the sun: sphere, moon: sphere, other planets: sphere So why would the earth be any different?

[@archyruze]

conboIf so if golf and tennis ball are round does hockey ball have to be a round?

[@archyruze]

and how much percent are you sure that the others planets actualy exits?

[@augustharris8572]

Rozario Cobanov 100 fucking percent. Because I can look the proof that the earth is a globe and that other planets _exist_. Does the government lie. Yeah. Does the government lie about everything? No. If you want be unique and cool, and 'enlightened' to the fact that the earth Is flat, make sure what you are saying has any scientific basis whatsoever.

[@GenDrake3]

my $5000 telescope has to be lying to me when i look at mars!!! Who put that red dorito in my telescope!!!

[@luukdikken1150]

Rozario Cobanov it's hockey puck, not hockey ball

[@ComradeDragon1957]

The Flat Earth Society has members all across the *globe* Hahahahahaha.Hahahahaha

[@ComradeDragon1957]

The Flat Earther in this video also is cherry picking evidence.Not only does he use a Superior Mirage of Chicago but he also fails to acknowledge the fact that the cities are partly hidden at the bottom.

[@frostcrackle2374]

that's actually hilarious

[@htomerif]

This is actually a pretty common tactic of theirs. There's two kinds of flat-earthers: the ones crapping out tons of content and making money off of it and the ones that buy into their idiocy. The ones making money off of it don't believe it for an instant. I dont think the guy in the referenced video believed a damn thing he was saying. It was just money. The fact that you can't see the bottoms of the skyline just wrecks their entire argument, and if he'd mentioned that its only on certain days with special weather conditions that you can see the skyline *at all*, well, then he'd have been honest, and not gotten nearly as many views.

[@MarkusGhambari]

If you had done a little bit of research, you'd know that most flat earthers including ODD who this guy is trying to "debunk" believe that flat earth society is controlled opposition to make the flat earth theory look stupid.

[@brianduckitt7207]

You mean "around" the globe, don't you?

[@zengalileo]

Very mature response. Can you tackle those who don't believe in dinosaurs?

[@arbabgill1376]

YES PLEASE!

[@ForgottenKnight1]

When you have a 40 feet skeleton sitting in a museum, there's not much room in the "believing department" left.

[@zero132132]

Most people that don't believe in dinosaurs are very large and very soft. Tackling them properly might actually be a bit difficult :(

[@stevenbaumann8692]

Anthony Uruchima you're, not your.

[@stevenbaumann8692]

The-Toy-Guy that's a comma, not a period.

[@emil5111]

So do you flat earth people believe the other planets are flat too?

[@relaxstars2672]

Planets don’t exist in the flat earth world

[@hashiramasenju9851]

I looked intp this for you, they think they are all round

[@FuryanJedi13]

@@hashiramasenju9851 So they are all round... except Earth, which is flat? Talk about mental gymnastics!

[@FuryanJedi13]

@Maria Seferi Which of course begs the question: why would THEY be round, but the Earth is NOT? More to the point, the Earth HAS been observed to be a sphere, but they dismiss all of that as being faked. Obviously, it doesn't add up, but like I said - mental gymnastics.

[@yahawahbahashemyahawahshi2600]

No other planets kiddo you been lied to since birth sorry to tell you .

[@joshuaharney1181]

I don't know if flat-earthers have an actual centralized organization they subscribe to, but i would love to see someone sponsor a flight to antarctica for their most senior members and make a documentary out of it.

[@florin920]

They don't want that cuz it would prove them wrong and they can't get that sweet youtube/donation money

[@momojaykins]

joshua harney literally it's impossible to get a flight to antarctica are you dumb

[@almightypip]

How is it impossible? Sure, no commercial airliner offers flights, but that doesn't make it impossible. I would a agree that it's probably easier to get there by boat, but I don't see why it would be a physically impossibility to fly there.

[@RS-nh9gu]

E.K. Robinson. Well. the bible says God created all animals and the man and the man would master all animals right ??? what about the dinosaurs ?? Who created them ??? Or, GOD was not alive yet by the time the dinosaurs were created ??

[@almightypip]

Buddy, I seriously think you need to read my comment again, because your response is almost meaningless in context.

[@arefallout]

Why dont flat earthers find the edges? Then we can talk about it.

[@MarkusGhambari]

They'll find the edge after you find the edge to "outer space"!

[@candy_apple8931]

AreFallout someone could have a flat stomach without edges

[@InternetDarkLord]

"Outer Space" has no fixed edge, as you go higher, the atmosphere gets thinner and thinner until you are in outer space. Where "outer space" begins is just a matter of definition. Meanwhile, you can see the stars, moon, and planets every night (except Seattle) so where are they? Virginia Beach?

[@MarkusGhambari]

InternetDarkLord How do you know this stuff? Let me guess. NASA told you so! LOL

[@InternetDarkLord]

Where do you live (except Seattle) where you can't see the sun or moon or stars every night? Why did people believe the earth is round before NASA? Why do 60 and counting nations have a space program?Why are there nongovernment rocket companies? Why does the air get thinner as you climb a mountain? Why does the air get colder as you climb a mountain? Why do airplanes have a maximum cruising altitude? Why do airplanes carry oxygen masks for emergencies high in the sky? Why do airplanes fly on Bernoulli's Principle? Have you ever read a science book?

[@InformationIsTheEdge]

Just out of curiosity, why is it that every single rendering of the look of Earth by flat earthers, is some mangled derivation of the globe? Why are there no photos of the other side? What does the "bottom" look like?

[@rah938]

InformationIsTheEdge, Either the image of some kind of bird, animal, or government building, I imagine.

[@yahawahbahashemyahawahshi2600]

The earth is built on foundations (Rock)

[@Pados_music]

@@yahawahbahashemyahawahshi2600 Where those foundation end? And what's beyond?

[@mos2952]

Flat Earth Hypothesis. Not a theory.

[@PurpleKnightmare]

+Mo S, not even a hypothesis, just a crazy idea.

[@fd3069]

Mountaindew that is as untrue as saying that C. Hitchens was saved before he died. Einstein did not believe in God. Just google the full quote you are thinking of.

[@charimonfanboy]

Mountaindew Genesis 1:1-15 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day. And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day. And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so. And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good. And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so. And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good. And the evening and the morning were the third day. And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. Not only does the bible say the world flat, it is in a dome, surrounded by water with only one sea and with sun, moon and stars floating around the underside of the dome. 432thedrop.com/uploads/3/3/8/9/3389030/3570939_orig.jpg

[@ashleyk8406]

Mo S Flat Earth Fairytale, more like.

[@louistournas120]

+charimonfanboy: Why did you copy paste genesis 1 from the jewish book?

[@violetofthevoid]

Even the Egyptians who had zero access to space travel knew the earth was a globe.

[@TjfOMMA]

Say10WarShipper no they didn't

[@lordlammi1562]

T 3000 I think he's getting the Egyptians confused with the Greeks.

[@TjfOMMA]

Jude SquirrelMonkey i think so too.

[@johntaylor9854]

on a flat earth, wouldn't the sun be visible all the time? Instead of disappearing at night?

[@BloodTar]

A flat-earther thinks that the sun works similar to a flashlight__pointing its light in one direction.

[@Sunkuwong]

Sevatar 11 H-... How does that even work? Again, that would mean the sun would be visible to everyone. All the time.

[@denizyuksel5093]

+John Taylor Not really. It circles right above their dome and head, much like a vulture.

[@redrumthebum]

Sevatar 11 that didn't explain anything

[@redrumthebum]

Sevatar 11 it doesnt mean the earth is flat... There are a bunch of holes agaisted the "Flat Earth Theory"

[@RaineTrimley]

There are no photos of a flat earth...

[@SeaDickey]

Go to the seashore and watch a sun rise or sunset. What you will see is the sun disappear below the horizon because the Earth is a sphere. If the world was flat what you should see is the sun get smaller an smaller until is vanishes from sight. What you do see is the sun which is still the same size as it sets cut in half as it sinks below the horizon. On a flat Earth this could never happen because the sun could never sink below the horizon as it would always be above the horizon until it reached the vanishing point. You would never see a half of a sun as it sets.

[@nenadsavanovic8628]

Yeah I'm pretty sure when I call my family in Bosnia at Midnight EST, they're enjoying the sunrise... Ah, it can't be true... KZbin said so...

[@TheClassicWorld]

Hhahaa, I thought my jokes were bad... these people don't live by the sea, they live deep fucking under it.

[@michaelparsons2225]

Paul Dickey if earth was flat, you would also see the sun moving on a curved path. It apparently moves like the hand if a clock. why we don't see it moving in a circular motion? Also phase if the moon, how is it possible on flat earth? debunked again

[@thephaneron3676]

*+Mike M* Lol. The sun isn't visible in the Arctic (North Pole) for a solid 6 months a year. If earth were flat, the sun couldn't possibly set. Given it's proposed altitude, the trigonometry concludes that in the southern hemisphere, the sun couldn't possibly sink lower than *12.9 degrees* above the horizon at it's lowest point. In the Arctic circle, the sun couldn't possibly sink lower than a whopping *28.7 degrees* at it's lowest point. It would be midnight sun everywhere- all the time.

[@deanc9099]

prove it

[@arnouth5260]

I know how flat-Earthers think. 1. They want to be different 2. They say that they think earth is flat 3. They begin to believe it

[@archiebald4717]

If the earth is flat, why do cats not knock everything off it?

[@ackvon9081]

*The Earth is not flat! Deal with it!*

[@arnouth5260]

Ackvon but all proof says that the earth is a globe, so it is flat (wow that's amazing evidence wow)

[@ackvon9081]

Ha.

[@joseyflorez6492]

Ackvon hello I'm your fellow 12 year old. You are a fucking idiot. Please, Please USE THAT FUCKING BRAIN!!!! OR AT LEAST GET SOME THERAPY!!! GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!

[@KhoaLe-uc2ny]

Someone 1282 globe is ball shape and flat is like the surface of a paper

[@hyst6081]

Josey Florez I can't tell if you are serious or not

[@SteverRob]

Number of flat earthers: rising Number of stupid people on the internet: rising Coinkydink?

[@A-Duck]

That was covered in his second point, "stupid people on the internet". Your addition is redundant.

[@pleaseenteranamelol711]

if only these people were aborted.

[@pleaseenteranamelol711]

if only these people were aborted.

[@preflex3502]

Shame on you, gobsnobber muffin. "If only these people were educated in the fields of mathematics, geometry, and physics" would likely yield more benefit than their non-existence. How do you have any way to be sure that they will be flat-earth-belieiving fools while they are still in the womb? I suspect that even the majority of the downs-syndrome-affected population accepts that the world is round because their teachers told them so, possibly hundreds of times. Downs is pre-natally detectable, but I have seen no evidence of pre-natal detectability of flat-eartherism, and would be highly skeptical of any such evidence offered, because flat-eartherism seems to depend more upon memetics than genetics. While they will never be rocket scientists, the folks who deny the spheroid shape of the earth can still be whopper-floppers regardless of their understanding of the shape of the Earth or gravity, because the meat patty will still fall back to the cooking surface whether they believe it should or not. They can still mop the floor. They can still wash your car. They still have utility. They can still enrich our lives. They can still change their minds and become ex-flat-earthers. In the worst-case-scenario, if they're so fatally-gullible, snobs like you can easily defraud them and enrich yourselves (It's okay as long as they're stupid, right? And if they fall for it, they are!). There is no logical excuse for denying them life upon the grounds of disbelief in a spheroid Earth, and I once again suggest that you should be ashamed of yourself for suggesting otherwise. What if I proposed that anyone who lacks empathy for the disadvantaged should be aborted? How would you feel about that? (Hint: this is a reasoning test)

[@wojtylo]

gobsnobber muffin you sound like one of those nazi SS or Stalin’s KGB guys who had the same idea about people with different ideas then their own and they did aborted those people even after their birth.

[@Murdrocks]

wtf... litterally 2 hours ago you had 20 300

[@alexbecker1661]

now 21.280

[@glutinousmaximus]

...And now it's 10,667!?! *_:0)_*

[@alexbecker1661]

Adam Mangler you mistook views for followers

[@glutinousmaximus]

Ah - Thankyou! ᵔᴥᵔ

[@Spark-In-The-Dark]

Murdrocks that's what happens when you propagandized and dumb people down. "Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect" mark twain. The fact is that the majority of the people of the world do not have the critical thinking skills to prevent themselves from being manipulated and we all know that the rulers of earth love to manipulate

[@crispsuk9779]

2018 and this shit's still going on. Sad when considering that the bloody ancient greeks figured out the earth wasn't flat 2000 years ago.

[@Roedygr]

Flat Earthers A flat-earther in the modern day has to ignore the following: Ships coming over the horizon appear mast first. Satellites would not work if the world were flat. GPS (Global Positioning System) would not work if the world were flat. Nobody has ever detected the edge of the world. Photos from space or from the moon show that the earth is spherical. All the other large bodies in space are spherical. All astronomers agree that the earth is a rough sphere. (slightly pear shaped actually) Why then does a flat-earther persist in believing the earth is flat? On a small scale, the earth appears flat. They carefully avoid reading any explanation of why this is so. They imagine Australians would fall off the earth if the earth were a sphere. They carefully avoid reading any explanation of why this does not happen. So basically the problem is a trust in gut intuition that trumps all evidence . Climate Change Deniers are Like Flat Earthers There are two kinds of climate change deniers: professional and fools. The professionals are not at all confused about climate change, however, they disseminate false information about climate change in order to prolong the life of their fossil fuel investments, knowing full well they will ruin the planet in the process. They don’t care. They are elderly. Even though folk like the Koch brothers are billionaires, nothing is more important to them than a few extra points of profit. They are mentally ill planetary traitors, but because they are rich, we don’t incarcerate them. Why then do the fools become climate change deniers? Wishful thinking. Nobody wants to contemplate the end of our planet. Wishful thinking. Nobody wants to divert some of their income to deal with climate change. The propaganda that hooked them was skillfully written to exploit their prejudices and ignorance. Religion teaches people to distrust science. People like the Koch brothers encourage extremely stupid people to think they are smarter that the combined efforts of the world scientists. Such a delusion feels great. The echo chamber and peer pressure. Climate deniers tend to have similar political views, and avoid talking to anyone else. Denying climate change is required for acceptance in the group. They have predecided that all science is corrupt, therefore they must scrupulously avoid reading any least it prove compelling. They are like the clerics who refused to look through Galileo’s telescope.

[@Wildcopper]

@Roedy Green : Many of them are actually religious extremists, as you can see here. Mostly catholics and muslims. The kind of people who think one single book is always right and delivers the ultimate truth. They can become dangerous people, as we see in the world nowadays.

[@Bunny23723]

very good explaination.

[@ryanrooney4822]

Earth is flat. - Your friendly neighbourhood photon

[@professorclup1082]

Twenty One Airplanes How?

[@InevitableTruth247]

You missed the joke

[@professorclup1082]

Loostio Boostio Oh hahahah got it

[@skyeplus]

Good one.

[@viktor7536]

-Your Friendly 4 Dimensional Being

[@cryptojihadi265]

One of my favorite arguments from people who claim we havent EVER gone to the moon is why haven't we gone back? Oh, i dont know. Maybe becusse it's dangerous and expensive AF and how many times do we need to send somone up to walk around the moon and pick up a few rocks to bring back? Been there, done that!

[@windowpane7841]

the earth is not round nor flat. its actually a solid blob created by the Ancient Frog People from Ponguea.

[@supersublimnails5676]

That's a lie earth is a hologram

[@raeechllee]

Lies it a banana shapes grape

[@seanstevenduco5722]

earth is an illusion.

[@drknow7597]

The most irritating thing that Flat Earthers say is " The horizon always RISES to eye level " that statement alone disproves FLAT earth. Are they saying that the earth is concave and the edge of the earth rises up, AND, you can see to the edge of the earth?? If you are standing on the shore line and 6ft tall -183cm, eye level is about 5ft 8in -173cm, on the horizon eye level is still 5ft 8in - 173cm. The higher up you go the higher eye level is. The horizon never RISES.

[@richardross1166]

I've also pointed that out. Every single time the flatearther leaves the conversation. Almost as if they were simply repeating things they'd heard without understanding or thinking about it.

[@lame-o]

"The flat world society has members all around the world" - some person on twitter

[@sfd7833rg]

Rryno i only know it with all around the globe

[@chase1146]

Question for flat earthers. If the earth really is flat what would actually happen if you went off the side.

[@chase1146]

i never said you fall off the earth. i asked what happens when you went on the side of the earth. or the side of the crust as you put it.

[@chase1146]

weve explored quite a fair deal of antartica. no where have i ever seen a dome shape like that. thing is if the earth was flat, gravity of the earth would collapse it back into a ball shape. even if it didnt then gravity would make it seem like your going up a steeper and steeper hill until at the very edge it would almost seem vertical. cities would have to be put on an incline so that it would feel like right side up was at a right angle to the ground. suck a simple thing almost destroys all arguments of a flat earth. not to mention the fact that with a fair amount of helium balloons and a camera you can actually see the curvature of the earth

[@Linkskyfyre]

Go watch eric dubay or jeranism

[@chase1146]

no you explain it yourself

[@salemtroy2612]

they believe that gravity doesn't exist sounds illogical to say so

[@cabeloguns]

do flat earthers use GPS and watch Satellite television?

[@TheComputec]

+cabelguns They assert that these are all ground based systems... there are NO geo-stationary satellites... and nothing and nobody can escape the firmament and the government is controlling access to Antarctica Skylab-Fake Apollo-Fake ISS-Fake but a pamphlet from a victorian snake oil salesman spouting on about a disc shaped earth held aloft by turtles is nearly as valuable as their goat-herders handbook... 99.9% of FE advocates are deluded creationists You will start off asking them pertinent questions and then eventually realise you are wasting your time. At that point, all you can hope to do is put the opposing arguments out there in the hope that young impressionable minds see the information and it wards them away from the tin-foil hat morons

[@jakewastaken]

You've summed all of this up quite succinctly.

[@tntmoncton]

There's is no sattlelites Common sense

[@tntmoncton]

I pray for you Man . The Bible is wrong ? Wow.

[@jakewastaken]

Even if we presuppose that God is real and even if we presuppose Christianity was the only one to get it right, we definitely know "the bible" is rife with inaccurate and downright "wrong" statements. First of all, there are practically countless versions of this text, so referring to it as "the bible" is quite useless as different versions not only have different translations, interpretations, outright re-wording and summaries, but different versions also have different collections of scripture inside. Then, once you identify which book, you have to look at which version and in what language.Are we talking New Testament? Old? Which books are to be included? Which gospels? Which scrolls? Let's assume you're using the King James bible edition in English printed for an American audience with editing and a new copyright of sometime in the last 30 years,, as that is the most likely and most common type of bible being discussed by people in your position. It is positively trivial to find incorrect and inaccurate statements within this specific text. We also have the history of how it was made and edited and which strategic changes they made to the texts and for what gain. There are many passages that were altered to suit their specific viewpoints and stances and to help push it onto a larger audience. You can't just say "well it's the word of God and or Jesus, so it can't be wrong." Even if it WAS meant to be his word, you sure as shit are not looking at that one right now and your beliefs are focusing on the nuances of that specific text if you're a fundamentalist rather than the "original" source (again, basically a worthless phrase and concept as there were multiple versions that were varied). If you're a genuine believer AND you still continue to think your views are based on a flawless text, than you should spend more time praying for yourself rather than other people. You're going to need it. PS. Flat Earth aside, let's not even focus on that. Satellites do exist and would exist even if the Earth were flat. It is also trivial to prove that satellites definitely exist. You can try to make up crazy explanations for how they get up there or how they actually travel/behave, but you can't just pretend they don't exist and aren't up there. If you think this can be the case, you just don't know enough about them from a technical standpoint. There are all kinds of hobbies out there that center directly around people's study of satellites and the tools we have to observe, manipulate, and otherwise interact and understand them and their paths. It is easy for them to hide satellites, but it would be harder to fake them at this point than to just really put them up. We have a lot of technology that would not work at all without them and could not be faked by stations located on the Earth.

[@Son_of_Mandalore]

I have only recently discovered your channel but I have to say that you, Sir, are an incredibly elloquent and articulate young man and I could listen to you for a long time. I have watched lots of your videos now and I have to say that I am in awe of your objectivity and your dedication to fact, science and truth. You are an inspiration to the scientific world and you give me hope (as an old man of 44 and an engineer) that there is hope for science, youth, objectivity and truth in the world. I design satellites and work in engineering innovation and I would love an opportunity to sit and talk to you for a couple of hours and although I know that I will never get the opportunity, you would be a valuable asset in the STEM progremme that we run in encouraging science based development for school all over the country. Thank you for your tireless efforts in helping bring debate, objectivity and an open mind to our objective world. I hope that you never give up and good luck in your future endeavours, education and future employ. If you would like an opportunity to be part of the STEM outreach then please get in contact, we always need intelligent, objective and articulate individuals to inspire the next generation of scentisits and innovators. In the likely eventt that you are way too busy, I would like to offer a sincere thank you for just doing what you do. PLEASE keep it up

[@Haqueip]

Congrats he became popular

[@jpeluso50]

What would be the point of science telling us the world is round if it's flat? What is the agenda?

[@archyneverpicked]

They think its got something to do with satan. It hurts to think that such idiocy still lives in the world today

[@MCMasters4ever]

From what I can tell, they believe that the money the states gives NASA each year is their motivation... as if that would even come close to enough to create a conspiracy at this scale.

[@Gadget622]

Jim Peluso Just because the data doesn't fit your hypothesis doesn't mean that science has an agenda. It means that your hypothesis was incorrect.

[@txntom2789]

jim how about looking into it, its a issue of them hiding God not saying a religion is correct but look into what the rulers of this world believe and then look at everything but if you think what they tell you then life dont matter just look into it the truth is plain as day

[@jpeluso50]

Are you then saying that the world is flat? I really don't think I understand your reply.

[@sanghelian]

i'm pretty terrified that there are people who are unable to comprehend basic things like perspective or three-dimensional space. i cannot think how they manage to go through their day without special assistance. Do flat-earthers count as mental disability?

[@reneeblack8037]

Fuck you you stupid ballheaded bitch

[@sanghelian]

One does wonder what's your wiew on the matter ;)

[@andtomill1]

What a reasoned and intelligent response gcft, *Sarcasm* just in case you missed it.

[@averagejoe2050]

Oh lord Niko, you are fucking stupid.

[@andtomill1]

Average Joe Oh look another reasoned rebuttal, do all you people go to the same debate school?

[@rashadblack96]

Bill Nye debunked flat earth easily lol. He said why won’t somebody just go to the edge of the earth and take a picture already?

[@dragon672]

No no no. Common sense is not allowed.

[@dertechl6628]

why?

[@justronjay9226]

What about cosmic sense?

[@dsdsspp7130]

techel because you're currently using a computer . building a computer using common sense is impossible. you can't see electrons. your senses are error prone.

[@dsdsspp7130]

that's the biggest difference between humans and other animals.

[@asdwerte1]

Is it only me that finds it very annoying that Flat Earthers consistently bring up the Michaelson Morely experiment as an argument, it wasn't an experiment to prove motion around the Sun at all it was to try and prove the existence of the aether... and since the aether doesn't exist of course the experiment failed!

[@vercingetorix6950]

Samuel Yeah but they are fucking retarded anyway. They don't even know how interferometry works much less what can be deduced from playing with one. I find some of the logic is so counter intuitive like the fact that South would be every direction even North from any position that isn't centered on the north pole . Or the fact that in vacuum feathers and lead accelerate equally toward center of mass. In fact every time they attempt to refute geniuses that spent a life time learning and explaining natural phenomenon with steampunk style physics and cosmology is just hysterical. I can't begin to understate how humanity is starting a new dark age of fear and repression and the consequence of this thought process . On the other hand I believe that 99% of these channels are for ad revenue and the creators have no belief in a flat earth .

[@Michaelrm954]

I hope you are right, I cannot fathom having the mindset that we are living I.on a giant fucking pizza 🍕.

[@Darkmoon8200]

Like most people without a proper education and grasp of scientific method, they use other's works to fuel their arguments, regardless of the validity of the works themselves. The more complex the "argument" is, the more true it will seem to them. To them the Michealson Morley experiment has already a resounding name, which alone is sufficient to disprove the idea of a spinning earth. We are talking about people who can't even understand the foundamental basics of non-euclidean geometry, of course you cannot counter argue showing them what the Michealson and Morley experiment was truly about and what are the actual outcomes. They will just say "The Michealson and Morley experiment already proved that the Earth is not moving" and they think they are done. Because a blog or a KZbin video said that.

[@dwaynethomas7984]

Samuel what's hilarious, is that you've seen the video/s, of the Chicago skyline, and other points of reference, that shouldn't be seen due to earth curvature. Yet your argument is about someone's knowledge of algebraic expressions, formulas ,and geometry! totally ignoring what your eyes just saw! You can't explain, why if you use binoculars, or a telescope, you can bring those boats right back into your visual sight line! ignore that too! and the Michelson Morley experiment may not have been intended to prove the motion of the earth, and expose that light travels thru an aether. But out doesn't mean, that it didn't expose a motionless earth in the process!

[@Darkmoon8200]

No, it means exactly that it didn't expose a "motionless Earth". It was a great experiment, but based upon a wrong assumption. Unlike what was thought, the light does not need a medium to travel through. No ether means no galilean composition of the speed of light regardless its direction, and no "ether wind" caused by the motion of earth influencing the detection of the speed of light. In other words, the speed of light has nothing to do with the speed of the Earth.

[@qualcunoacaso6733]

So wholesome to watch older videos now that Alex has almost half a million subs. Amazing job alex!

[@maximusthechampion4936]

You have just earned a new subscriber

[@justronjay9226]

_I bet you he gets a lot of those._

[@samowens200]

Sorry, my GPS wont work on flat earth.

[@robertcampbell6349]

I frequently drive through rural southeast Georgia and encountered dead zones where I have no cell phone service - zero bars and no signal yet my GPS continues working just fine. Therefore, GPS does not use cell phone towers for positioning.

[@WeWereOnline]

Depends on what GPS system your using.

[@andrejones2147]

Sam Owens if really not tho what carrier do you have ... mines works fine I have T-Mobile .... low rates as well

[@goodofall7265]

Only south of the equator. GPS is ground based. Just like LORAN before "GPS".

[@jenbill]

Goodall72 GPS is not As someone who has worked in GPS and space geodesy my entire life GPS Satalites are not dependent on cellular mast. GPS is microwave L band, signals don't go through buildings, hence why people don't use it indoors. And you need to track 4 satellites for a position solution. So you'd need MILLIONS of masts to even get close to the coverage provided by 24 satellites 12500 miles up. GPS works globally, so you'd need masts in the Arctic, Antarctic, in Siberia, deepest darkest Africa, its just silly, they would be everywhere. The problem is compounded even more because commonly receivers track 10 or more satellites, so every position on earth would need line of sight to 10 masts. A last sucker punch comes from the fact that GPS is one GNSS system, of which there are a few (Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, Compass...), they would all need their own masts. Interesting enough, masts are sometimes used as 'fake' satellites to augment GPS when coverage is poor. They are called pseudolites. Another subtler problem with ground masts is plate tectonics. 'Fiducial GPS', used in my previous work is accurate to a few mm. It is so accurate, tectonic plate motion overwhelms any time series you produce and it has to be removed before you could get near the phenomena you wanted to measure. Ground based transmitters, subject to the same plate motion as the receiver would see no such effect, plate motion would cancel out, unless you measured a baseline across a plate boundary or something. Lastly, there are thousands of continually operating Fiducial GPS stations scattered around the world, the data is free to anyone. If you process some concurrent data from many or all of those stations, the resulting network solution perfectly describes a spheroidal Earth. The mast system would theoretically work, but you'd need millions, and they would all need different numbers. LORAN short for (LOng RAnge Navagation ) worked that way, because it used much lower frequencies that COULD travel through solid objects, but there is a detrimental trade off with system accuracy, results would be orders of magnitude worse than GPS accuracy. E-LORAN has been adopted as a back up to GPS in an extreme emergency for shipping and localized airport terminal use

[@keesdenheijer7283]

Calculations for elevations of antennas are only consistent with a spherical earth and not at all with a flat earth. And all you need to know is the theorem of Pythagoras.

[@GhostLightPhilosophy]

Two things upset me about this video... 1. The sheer amount of dislikes is shocking 2. The fact in a post enlightenment era we still have to debunk flat earth arguments is shocking also

[@hongry-life]

Most shocking is masses of people believing every word that self proclaimed authority states without questioning anything ever.

[@tgstudio85]

@@hongry-life Right, because idiots like you have knowledge to question anything;)

[@WorldBeans]

@@hongry-life but you guys get mad when we question religion though?

[@hongry-life]

@@WorldBeans Idk who 'you guys' are, but I am not mad.

[@hongry-life]

@@WorldBeans Idk who 'we' is either, I assume that you mean to say 'I'?

[@flamingpaper7751]

Members of the flat earth society can be found all around the globe

[@bleachbleach5599]

Flamingpaper I see what you did, there.

[@veeti4210]

I have never wanted to be an astronaut but now i feel like im going to get to nasa and get to space to take a couple of pictures.

[@FuryanJedi13]

Those flat Earth idiots will just claim that they're fake and that you're some government shill. It's sad and pathetic, really.

[@01wadder]

Looking through the comment you'll see parroted nonsense. The flat earth believers are getting desperate.

[@amojak]

indistinguishable from the bible squad..

[@LoresGate]

I like how you handle these ridiculous claims👍🏽

[@JohnMichaelson]

When a flat earther produces a map correct in area, distance, and bearing at all points, I'll take them as more than jokes. I mean come on, it's a 2d surface being translated to a 2d sheet of paper. It should be a simple matter of ratios. The fact no one ever has in all the 100+ years since the crackpot and plagiarist Gleason made his "new standard map of the world" that was nothing more than a simple spherical projection known for centuries should tell flat earthers that something in their theory stinks.

[@stevenblackburn1523]

John Michaelson CosmicSkeptic I too am a skeptic. I question everything. Religion is derived from astrotheology the worship of the cosmos. I have a question. You say the earth is so big that even at 73 miles high we still wouldnt really see the curvature. Then why is it in Nasa and others videos with ballons and clips like red bull the earth appears to be curved but then is fish eyed? hmm. lol think about whats happening Also I noticed saturn is your symbol. All religion goes back to the cube the 2 equilteral triangles oF SATURN. SATURN is the root to all of what humans knows as religous words and symbolism now either your way smarter than you let on or this is by chance I feel as though you may be a freemason and are working at what degree i dont know I believe the earth to be flat. Why else do the rulers of earth use flat earth maps. The ancients were not stupid we are just mimicing what they have already taught. we call it RE.search as is already been found we are jus reawakenin

[@jameswilkins1626]

We are working on an accurate flat earth map and we have been for three months now.

[@JohnMichaelson]

Who is "we" and are there any versions of this map viewable anywhere? If not, why not?

[@jameswilkins1626]

John Michaelson the reason there currently aren't viewable versions of this map is because it is extremely incomplete. When I say we I basically mean the flat earth community. There is this idea that would prove a flat or ball earth but it currently isn't being pursued. Here is the thing... It would cost 80 million dollars. I don't know the exact numbers but I'll kinda try to give you an idea. The concept is that you launch the amount of drones needed and space them apart perfectly so that you could see the entire earth at once. It requires a lot more though I'm just putting as simple as possible, and it is a pretty simple concept it's when you get into the math that it gets complicated. Why isn't that being done right now? Mainly because it needs more funding. On monday nights this guy Jeranism is on truthfrequencyradio.com and after him mark Sargent comes on. I'm pretty sure mark Sargent and others are the ones working on the map and they also take phone calls so you can call them and ask questions about the map or you can call and attempt to debunk flat earth.

[@JohnMichaelson]

I appreciate the info, thanks. I certainly hope you haven't given them any of your money unless you just have it available to flush down the toilet. For half that they could buy a Gulfstream jet and fly across Antarctica as many times as it would take for it to sink in to their thick heads that it's not an ice wall. They could charter multiple jets and take all the high altitude photos and video they want. For 1/100th of that cost they could all fly to Australia and drive across it to prove its width and then do the same in the United States and try to figure out how it's roughly the same distance.

[@humphreysmiggens3881]

record the sky in time lapse at a northern and southern hemisphere at the same latitude and if the sky rotation lines up....your move flat earthers

[@Fatcat-ss6nh]

Humphrey Smiggens they clearly don't have check mate, they are just low intelligent beings who have no factual based evidence on what they claim.

[@charleysturbos7320]

They all circle around the north star or polaris just like the sun and the moon. Explain your 66,600 mile west too east spin of the earth and the 23 degree tilt and the 497,000 mile spin through the universe and explain how the hell time lapse of the stars in always the same and not a difference universe and stars every damn day.

[@ChiversVinny]

Hello Charley! I'm going to do my best to explain it to you. Well, Polaris wasn't the original 'North Star' and won't be the last, but I won't go into that to avoid confusion. Everything does not revolve around Polaris, it only appears to do so when in the Northern Hemisphere, in the Southern Hemisphere, it appears to revolve around a different star (Sigma Octanis) and at the equator, a time lapse would reveal straighter trails. Your numbers are a mixture of wrong and misplaced. The circumference of the Earth is 24,901 miles, the tilt as of now is 23.5 degrees and it spins at close to 1000mph. The figure of 66,600 is the rate of miles (per hour) the Earth is orbiting the sun, not spinning. Wouldn't such a rate of movement be noticeable in a time lapse? Not unless it was over a longer period than a few hours/days. The fact is that we are small. Tiny. A lot of the stars we observe are millions of lightyears away. It's like when you're driving in a car and the moon appears to remain at the same distance, even though you are moving towards it. I know what you're confusing yourself with in regards to the axis though, you're imagining the Earth being still, on an angle, with the stars (and planets etc.) spinning around evenly and the 'right way up' (there isn't a right way up). This isn't what happens though. The reason that the stars appear to be in very similar positions day to day is because it's the Earth (our view) that is spinning. The axis is irrelevant, whichever way the Earth was tilted, everything would still move relative to the rotation. I hope this is understandable, if you have further questions or want me to clarify anything, you can reply to this.

[@khamullsacer]

waiting for some response, this thread is getting interesting :D

[@adamhunter1223]

For the Q&A: How do you deal with the hate speech/bigorty/moral bankruptcy of the heavily religious crowd? Seeing it and living with it really wears me down and I'd like to know how other people put up with it.

[@26wannabefarmer1]

You should ask globe promoters and science philosophers here on youtube to answer that question they are some of the most hateful, dimwitted, truth deniers, and theoretical people on here

[@RustyWalker]

_"theoretical people"_ Lol. It's cute when you try to sound smart.

[@01wadder]

26wannabefarmer1 "hateful,dimwitted,truth denier. That pretty much sums up Flat earth believers. Surely it's about time for a little flat earth evidence. Where is it?

[@RustyWalker]

Questions end in a question mark. Don't try and correct me again. You simply don't have the mental ability to keep up. I'm sorry, but it's true.

[@thoughtlesskills]

Option 1 - Relocate Option 2 - Place fingers in ears and repeat: "La La La"

[@Durrutitv]

The notion that all pictures of earth are composites is ridiculous. Satellite images are composites because satellites sit in near-earth orbit and, therefore, earth is too close to the lense to get the entire shot in a single frame. However, we have full earth shots from Apollo 17 and and a number from Voyager from a range of distances, both near earth extending to the reaches of the solar system until earth can barely be picked up by the camera.

[@crocdoc2]

Have you ever tried to explain this to a flat Earther? I have. I have also tried to explain how the distance from the subject and focal length of the lens can distort proportions, easily explaining why the continents appear to be different sizes in different images of the Earth taken from low Earth orbit vs some distance. May as well be talking Swahili. They're not interested in facts which go against their shiny new belief because the cognitive dissonance is painful.

[@democracydignityhumanrights]

negatyve I thought of the same thing communard!

[@janestakelley4001]

I definitely believe that the earth is a globe, but do you happen to have access to these full earth shots? I'm trying to educate someone whom I really care about that was actually fooled by this flat earth nonsense.

[@crocdoc2]

+Wild Kate To be honest, you'll be wasting your time trying to use satellite imagery as they'll just scream 'fake' or 'composite' and it's an easy out for them. You're far better off applying the scientific method and providing them with samples of evidence which are supported only by the spherical Earth model but destroy the flat Earth model. Almost everything in the southern hemisphere falls into this category. For example: 1. The presence of the south celestial pole (not the south pole). There can't be two celestial poles on a flat Earth. 2. The visibility of the constellations (such as Crux, the Southern Cross) that rotate around the south celestial pole concurrently from two different southern hemisphere continents when both are under darkness. For example, Crux is visible in the southern part of the sky all night, every night, all year for cities 34 degrees south and further. Sydney, Australia, Cape Town, South Africa and Santiago, Chile are all just about smack on 34 degrees, so for part of the night the Southern Cross is visible in both Sydney and Santiago, then later in the night it is visible concurrently in both Sydney and Cape Town. This is impossible on a flat Earth. 3. Flight paths between southern hemisphere continents do not match flat Earth maps. For example, direct flights between Sydney and Johannesburg or Sydney and Santiago.

[@Durrutitv]

The Apollo moon missions were able to get full earth photos, including the blue marble photo. Just google apollo full earth photo. There is a famous, and absolutely gorgeous, full shot of earth taken from Apollo 17 titled The Blue Marble, www.wikiwand.com/en/The_Blue_Marble Also, there are deep space photos that have been taken and transmitted back to earth by the voyager and cassini probes, both can be found easily with google, including a gorgeous picture taken by cassini of earth from saturn's rings.

[@angella9369]

This channel is underrated

[@caseman1967]

Don't deny the sun. Get out of the house once in a while!

[@thephaneron3676]

*+caseman1967* Who the fuck denies the sun except a photophobic? Lol

[@presssecretaryalexjones969]

The Phaneron I've seen quite a few flat earthers deny the existence of the sun and deny the existence of space in general, they think it's a hologram or projector

[@kyle857]

caseman1967 He's clearly English. There is no sun there. Stop white shaming.

[@rudolfbart]

ask the wikings they knew best that there is a flat earth ok was a few hundres years ago but hey dont we say older have best idears

[@isabelgraham4388]

Just Some Guy Ok hey woah we had a few minutes of sun last week don't generalise

[@deejaye2647]

Wow, here in Sept 2019 this fellow has almost 300K followers! A bit late to the party, but am happy I found him.

[@uglyjack8577]

The flat Earthers are the reason I bought my 7yo daughter a globe

[@JiveDadson]

I have never been convinced that the Flat Earthers are not trolls.

[@Conserpov]

I'd say same thing if I haven't seen enough Flat Earthers genuinely suffering from dementia. Poe's law...

[@waybmx]

JiveDadson your statement includes a double negative also you seem to be trolling with that as well. Shillarious

[@JiveDadson]

@Conser pov No it doesn't.

[@Zero11s]

wrote the Troll

[@bibbanbay]

I have been looking at flat earth the way you do with an open mind. It is admirable if you want to make an effort into changing some flat-earthers’ minds. But be prepared to meet quantities of stupidity that you couldn’t even imagine would exist. This video of yours is too much common sense for many flat-earthers to bear. They will choke on it and die, so of course they refuse to listen, even at gunpoint I guess. But good luck in your endeavour!

[@Mathemusician97]

God I hope he succeeds. We need to rid scientific illiteracy off of Earth.

[@kingclampz6081]

bibbanbay Lmfaooooooo

[@bibbanbay]

STEPHANIE LURRY AND THE LARRIORS Squiddely Boomp sasquatch MxaaeeegoWHH! Bnüwioshnek Champoogiaz Myrvelfjat!

[@nameless_flash]

Karissa Best All you did is prove that you don't know what your talking about. Whether you understand it or not the earth is spinning through space. The curve of the earth isnt exact bc this is a living natural planet with hills and mountains, at 90miles the curvature is barley noticable. We're not on planet kai from DBZ. Earth is huge

[@charleysturbos7320]

Negative ghost rider. Look up Flat earth clues , or Eric Dubay 200 reasons why the earth isn't spinning. Good try agent .

[@edwardklein3093]

IF the Earth WAS flat.....why the hell would there need to be a conspiracy to cover this up?!?!?

[@yahawahbahashemyahawahshi2600]

If the earth is flat it proofs there is only one god. No not the religious “Christian” god . The god from the Bible that says the earth is flat . God is not religious the Bible is a history book that’s its that’s all very simple . It’s a way of life . Religion is fake . Their main goal is to make you believe the Big Bang no god conspiracy and evolution which the dumbest shit ever . We never evolved from monkeys . We are intelligently designed human beings by one god and only one god.

[@hongry-life]

Because the ruling class cult has satanic beliefs. They do everything opposite, backwards and reversed,. Study it for some time.

[@davydtaylor4151]

The point you made at 7 mins about seeing the mountain from 80 miles away, is a valid argument, the problem is, they would still be able to see the mountain at that distance even if they weren't elevated. Go back and look at all the pictures they use to show long distance views. They all have one thing in common, water refraction. Water refraction bends light which enables the viewer to see further than they should. This is an age old argument that flat earth'ers use and it can be debunked easily. Just ask for an image that has no water in the frame. I'm surprised they haven't gone to arguing about how gyroscopes work.

[@Hellsong89]

They have and you would not believe what kind of cluster fuck that was... i think i lost at least 10% of my brain cells in that trip into insanity..

[@zanick2]

so, im looking out to a mountain about 60 miles away and i see a LOT more than just the 3000ft point and higher. no water, so no refraction. what is the reason for this. (the mountain is 4000ft high).

[@davydtaylor4151]

zanick2 the gradient of the earth doesn't always fall at the exact same amount. We don't live on a basketball. Or You could be elevated? Also, I could be wrong but doesn't the earth fall away at about 8 inches per mile? so you should only be missing 480 inches of your mountain, not a thousand foot. Like I said this isn't set in stone but it's a pretty accurate way of working out this problem. Thanks for the reply.

[@zanick2]

i was going off the youtuber'scalculation based on that 50 or so mile deviation. 50 miles x 8" =400", or 33ft.. that makes much more sense. i wonder why he was quoting the hawaii contrast as being 3000ft and higher.

[@zanick2]

remember, its 8" per mile, squared...................thats where the 3000ft came from.

[@thephaneron3676]

Don't get too excited over the lunar eclipse. It's called a *selenhelion syzygy.* These rare events ONLY happen when the sun and moon are on *polar binary opposite* ends of the horizon- an illusion lasting for only approximately *6-8 minutes MAX* before one or either the sun or moon SETS beneath the horizon, while the other continues to RISE, thus completing the syzygy alignment from a *visual perspective.* Emphasis on "visual perspective," being the key word! Of course, both bodies always WERE aligned the entire time that both the sun and moon were (albeit temporarily) visible together. *Selenhelion eclipses* occur for the exact same reason that the sun is never quite in it's exact position just before it sets; but in actuality is always slightly *below* where we perceive it to be. It is a common phenomenon of *light refraction;* and is a well documented, well understood event when it comes to selenhelion eclipses. In saying this, you would be *extremely hard pressed* to witness a lunar eclipse where BOTH the sun and moon are high in the sky and/ or NOT on binary opposite ends of the horizon temporarily, owing to the fact that they simply *DO NOT HAPPEN!* Ever. Lmao. Nice try, flattards :)

[@Eggwithlegs54]

sfg911 fuck you

[@giokyo9465]

If you bring an "flat earther" to space theyll say its CGI lol

[@FrankHarrison12]

I've always found the "NASA Photos of the Earth are composites!" argument to be ridiculously self-defeating.. composites are what you should expect given a spherical Earth. If it was flat and they had to make up images from scratch they wouldn't need composites and would have no problem lying and saying that it wasn't altered in any way.

[@astraestus8828]

Well I guess 4.7k people watched this and went " yeah I agree with the flat-earthers". 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

[@michaelbraunmiller8627]

I don't think they actually watched it

[@panaroid9636]

Flat earthers do give some good entertainment

[@HYPNOTICVIDEO]

The waves of the ocean,the wind,moving clouds.tides all of that suggest a revolving globe,it's so logical.

[@PittsburghSonido]

Hypnotic one of my favorite arguments is the color of the sky at sunset. Flat earth cannot explain how when the sun is setting over a portion of the earth, the light bends over the round shape of the earth, thus stretching the cool blue of our atmosphere to a warm pink or red and even yellow.

[@essencemusic384]

I've two friends that has sailed from South Africa to Australia as part of a round the world challenge. This is the route that apparently you cannot buy direct flights for as they always go via Dubai etc. If the world was flat (with Antarctica around the outside edge) then they wouldn't have made the trip in 3 weeks.

[@Wildcopper]

This is something no stupid "flat earther" is able to dismiss. Neither can they explain why the southern continents are so small and the northern so large if the earth was flat. It's easy to drive from one side of Australia to the other and realize it's completely impossible that the earth is flat because the distance would be much greater.

[@freecommander]

Man ! How did you find this argument? It is " Scientifically based and proven "

[@freecommander]

Man I have bigger muscles in the upper part of my body because my body is "spherical", of course not because I am training the upper part more than the lower.

[@Wildcopper]

Apparently, you forgot to train the "brain" muscle...

[@danielvine6810]

I think the best arguement to debunk the flat earth theory is the same one they use. "Just look at it" ... yeah. Can you see anything past the horizon? If Asia is supposed to be on the other side of the ocean why can't we see it? It's almost as if the earth curved and we can't see as its no longer in our line is sight. The horizon itself is proof of a flat earth. Otherwise, unless of mountains, we would be able to see far away places on other parts of the world from standing at a tall tower. Infact, if the globe was flat, and if we had a powerful enough binoculars, if we stood on the highest point of the earth (Mount Everest) we would be able to see every section of the world. Which we can't. Because the globe is curved in a ball.

[@freyalombaert5526]

Daniel Vine You ecplained it well!

[@danielvine6810]

*the horizon itself is is proof against a flat earth

[@charleysturbos7320]

Atmosphere, the air is made of 71 percent nitrogen and we have fog , mist , air pollution and a ton of other things that only allow your eyes to see on average 7 miles or so. Sometimes we can see 140 miles from places like Mckinnley and that wouldn't be possible if it were a sphere of 24,900 miles which adds up too eight inches curve for every mile sqaured. Flat earth clues or 200 reasons why the earth isnt spinning will show you hundreds of reasons why you are incorrect. Research please.

[@danielvine6810]

charleysturbos light still travels in a straight line. If you can actually see a mountain on the horizon but can't see the foot of the mountain (which I can from where I live) that itself proves that the earth has a curved surface. It's basic science and logic to deduce the fact that the earth is a globe. You should take that tinfoil hat off and look at ACTUAL evidence and do REAL research. The earth is round and humanity has known that for hundreds of years. If you have actual evidence that the earth is flat, go and collect your Nobel Prize. If not, shut the fuck up and read up on facts.

[@charleysturbos7320]

Daniel , You shut the fuck up. I know thousands of things more then you. I know more about your Heliocentric shit then you do. Your argument is stupid ass. I just told you that mist, waves , Nitrogen and various the law of perception only allows you to see around seven miles in most cases. Also your 24,900 mile around earth works out to eight inches curve per mile squared. And their are hundreds of videos showing that what you think you see in the ship the buildings the whatever dissapearing in the horizon is only your eyesight not being able to see that far. But in reality if you zoom in when you cannot see something anymore the camera or whatever you use can zoom the object completely back into site after you think it's dropped off the sapposed curved earth. Hint in finding hundreds of these examples. Look up Nikon p900 here on you tube. Oh and the eight inches curved per mile squared is your heliocentric 24,900 miles around reference on how much curve should be. And yet you ask google or anything what the curve from anywhere on earth to anywhere else is and it will never come up with a answer . You know why? Because their is none, EARTH IS FLAT. If you respond and are too lazy to look for a video i will send you five in the next few minutes. But if you truly want to be convinced and shown a great video showing you what i know then look up "Flat earth Clues" or 200 reason why the earth is flat and not spinning". Let me know, and ps i was only offensive and rude because you said shut the fuck up when ive done litterally hundreds of hours of research on this and will do thousands more. Because it is the biggest thing i've ever learned about in my lifetime. And what you should be asking is why would they lie.

[@itsshwiftyyy8393]

Even if the world was flat, gravity would pull it back into a sphere

[@bryanmiller476]

Studio Warfare not really Gravity it nothing more than the earths centripetal force from its spinning throwing everything against itself And the bigger the object spinning and faster it spins the stronger the force That's why the moon which is smaller than the earth has gravity but it's much weaker Out in space, there is no gravity pushing on the earth There's no defined up or down in space either You feel the same walking around weather you are the north side or the south side cuz the centripetal is equal at equal distance from the center from all ends So people never feel like they are upside down to other on the opposite side of the earth

[@Chribit]

Bryan Miller Gravity IS NOT centripetal force. Gravity can act as a centripetal force if you look at why earth revolves around the sun for example. The sun acts as central and centripetal force in such math equations. "Out in space, there is no gravity pushing on the earth"... uhm... we rotate around the sun due to gravity of said sun. the stars in our galaxy also revolve around a giant black hole (probably) due to gravity. Gravity is the attraction of small objects to bigger objects in space or objects to each other in general. the last sentences are right though. Gravity is the reason why we don't feel like being "upside down"... also because there is no up and down really. (you could say up = away from earth and down = towards earths core though) Now we have to remember: we do not know what gravity is, we just know how it affects other objects. it could be dark energy or dark matter that tell us why this attraction happens. who knows.

[@bryanmiller476]

Gravity is caused by centripetal force of the planet or sun rotating

[@bryanmiller476]

It's also why water and tornados spin in opposite directions on the north and south sides of the earth Just like a spinning ball, if you look at the top as it spins in a giving direction and then look face on at the bottom would be spinning the opposite way

[@Chribit]

no. gravity also occurs if you have two completely stable objects in a no-gravity area. those two objects will attract each other over time. yes, water and tornados do spin in opposite directions because of earths rotation. but that has nothing to do with gravity nor centripetal force. that's just simply due to the air moving with the earths rotation around it's own axes. (although the air does stay on earth because of gravity.) gravity and centripetal force are not the same thing.

[@mc3newsmcocconcierge504]

I love how there are always like 3k flat earthers that dislike all irrefutable proof. It’s like they don’t want to see proof.

[@ikoloo5942]

You are wrong.If earth is round why arent my shoes also round?instead they are flat

[@mc3newsmcocconcierge504]

ikolo o lol

[@JohnCashin]

Putting all the hard evidence that gives us good reason to be sure the Earth is a sphere to one side for a moment, one of the biggest problems I have with the Flat Earth camp is that so far, I have never heard from them a good reason as to why we would be lied to about the shape of the planet? What would the world governments gain from telling the masses that the Earth is a sphere if it's not? It would make no difference to our lives anyway, in terms of the power structure, I just can't see what the motive would be, if they could give me even a half decent motive, I might give it more consideration, as it is, it is very difficult to take seriously, although, I do try to be as open minded about things as I can, however, for me to even entertain a conspiracy theory, I need that all important motive and I'm just not seeing it with this Flat Earth thing at all, they will claim we are being lied to, sure, I get that but now tell me why are they lying? Nobody lies unless there is a good reason to do so, there's no reason as far as I can see.

[@7Pagod]

@John Cashin I'm just gonna copy paste what I wrote to someone else since I think it fits your question. Well it'll depend on which model of flat earth is the correct one (I'm not saying that any of them are right, I'm just answering the question.) 1) If the world is in a dome then it probably means something intelligent put it there. (aliens, god, I dunno.) 2) If the earth is motionless and the universe revolves around it, humans go from being unimportant specs of dust in the cosmos to being super duper important (since everything literally revolves around them.) 3) If there's an infinite stretch of ice past antarctica instead of a dome then maybe there's more "worlds" out there, buried in their own ice holes. qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-c57828dc26b550ee91a3cc9ab42796a9

[@tintman831]

John Cashin they are hiding god guy! So the world started by a Big Bang out of nowhere that created everything but flat earthers sound crazy

[@lubb213]

your understanding of physics is disappointing​ haha

[@JustAnotherBuckyLover]

@Charlie Cross yeah but there's a difference between one pathological liar and an entire world conspiracy that's been going on for hundreds of years involving all governments even when they're at war with each other (a la the Cold War and space race). Surely if Russia wanted to trash the USA or vice versa, all they had to do was PROVE that the other one was lying about an globular earth, and boom! Instant pwnage. But no... The very fact that it's almost impossible to keep a conspiracy secret for long even in just ONE country means that the concept of a worldwide conspiracy between every physicist, all amateur and professional astronomers, astronauts, GPS system developers, Satellite everything, pilots etc just blows my mind... It's as insane as the people who still deny the moon landings or 9-11 or the Holocaust.

[@AlexSoetekouwProductions]

The earth is a fidget spinner.

[@aidanhoward213]

There is one intriguing counterargument against the "flat-earthers" photographic proposition that I have not yet come across. If it is true that NASA "photoshops" its images of the Earth, and Alex does seem to deal with this adequately, I at the same time recall that the first full photo of the Earth, called the Blue Marble shot, was taken on 7 December 1972. However, Photoshop was not invented and launched until 1988. Having learnt the art of photography and of photographic development as a journalist and editor through the 1980s, before Photoshop, and then of Photoshop itself, after its arrival, I can say with certainty that if a 1972 photo had been doctored in any way, especially by turning a flat disc into a sphere, any even amateur photographer would be able to tell. Back in those days, NOBODY was THAT good a fraud. (And let us not forget that at the time, the Russians were America's staunch enemy, so I doubt that they would have keenly organised some back-room arrangement to fabricate THEIR photos as well, just to help out NASA in its deception.)

[@nenadsavanovic8628]

Oh but dude, the government, NASA, Harambe! You can't trust anything. (except KZbin videos made by amateurs, of course) *Sarcasm*

[@truthissocialsuicide9518]

"A funny thing happened on the way to the moon". Look it up. Not all fakes have to be photoshopped.

[@JesseTheGameDev]

Starting at 5:20 in the skyline photos. It's ironic that the photos he's using to prove his point show that many of the buildings are being hidden by the horizon, which is actually just more evidence for curvature.

yes, it's absurd how willfully blind flat-earthers are.

[@jannoottenburghs5121]

That photoshop argument is such a bad argument. Models on magazines also get photoshoped, but that doesn't mean a female on a magazine is a male irl.

[@filam7371]

Unless it's Caitlyn Jenner...

[@rickkwitkoski1976]

You've come a LONG way in 7 years, Alex. Good for you.

[@dumbcat]

The Morgile has already destroyed this child's nonsense. The only thing this video proves is that there are another 20,000 brainwashed, lost souls in the world.

[@alwinpriven2400]

www.metabunk.org/flat-earth-theory-debunked-by-short-flights-qf27-qf28-from-australia-to-south-america.t6483/

[@Zoloph]

Hans, no sir, TheMorgile did not destroy the CosmicSkeptic's points. What TheMorgile did was issue a lot of ridicule and demeaning drivel at an attempt to hide the fact that he couldn't supply a rational argument to support a flat earth theory. TheMorgile is a lazy debater who employs illogical and irrelevant statements as a means to discredit his opponent. Well, it won't work with logical free-thinkers. Either you and he are both trolls or you are incredibly gullible. In either case, you both would benefit from some serious counseling.

[@dumbcat]

Zoloph Zoloph, no sir. No. The Morgile clearly won. Sorry you can't admit that.

[@chemicalbrother5743]

The earth is not flat. If the earth was flat, then gravity could not exist. If gravity didn't exist, then the earth has to be moving up (according to flat-earth-theory). If the earth was moving up, it would be moving up with THE SAME SPEED AT ALL POINTS (including mountain peaks). If the earth was moving up with the same speed at all points, then the weight of all objects at any point on the surface MUST BE THE SAME. You can clearly go on a high mountain and weigh yourself there or anything else. Then you will SEE that the weight's a little bit less in comparision with standing on the ground. This conflicts our assumption that the earth is flat. Therefore Flat-Earth-Theory is disproven.

[@dumbcat]

Chemical Brother Please don't act like your 'arguments' have not been addressed. Your points have all been debunked.

[@jaysahunter256]

“Scientifically investigated” lol

[@comradekenobi8146]

I love that KZbin has an annoying flat earth wikipedia link to this.

[@Geo_K012]

Light bends over the horizon, that's why we can see the sun even after it already set

[@Geo_K012]

And that's also why we can see things that those flat-earthers say we should not be able to see on a globe.

[@trillrifaxegrindor4411]

you are a very intelligent example of a young man,my faith in the continued success of the human species is renewed.

[@asArsenic]

Our brains are also hardwired to orient ourselves on the horizon, we consider the horizon level even when it's not and you can create some really interesting optical illusions by messing with that mechanism.