10 People + AI = Billion Dollar Company?

As AI continues to evolve and advance, a line of thinking has emerged that humans will no longer need to learn how to write code in the future. If so, could this mean that a staff of ten or less could create a unicorn? The hosts of Lightcone analyze this prediction and discuss whether it has merit.
Chapters (Powered by bit.ly/chapterme-yc) -
0:00 Coming Up
0:51 What Jensen Huang said about coding
1:38 Now that computers can code, what does this mean for CS?
3:16 How good are AI programmers right now?
11:44 Good ideas come from the building process
14:50 The evolution of programming languages
17:52 The benefits of learning to code, even if computers can do it
18:57 Will we see more unicorns with 10 people (or fewer)?
23:58 A startup should be like a sports team, not a family
27:23 Applying engineering problem solving to non-engineering issues
28:55 What will happen if AI takes on more programming roles?
36:58 The verdict - learn to code!
38:07 Outro

[@chapterme]

Chapters (Powered by ChapterMe) - 00:00 - Coming Up 00:51 - What Jensen Huang said about coding 01:38 - Now that computers can code, what does this mean for CS? 03:16 - How good are AI programmers right now? 05:05 - Benchmark Datasets 08:34 - Will AI replace programmers: SWE-bench 11:44 - Good ideas come from the building process 14:50 - The evolution of programming languages 17:52 - The benefits of learning to code, even if computers can do it 18:57 - Will we see more unicorns with 10 people (or fewer)? 22:36 - Patrick Collison: Leadership Transition 23:58 - A startup should be like a sports team, not a family 25:33 - Scaling Challenges 27:23 - Applying engineering problem solving to non-engineering issues 28:55 - What will happen if AI takes on more programming roles? 33:38 - Making better for a real customer 36:58 - The verdict - learn to code! 37:51 - Crafts People 38:07 - Outro

[@eachlabs]

Summary by Each Current State of AI Programming - AI tools are becoming more reliable for simple tasks. - Advances like the sBench dataset have significantly improved AI programming. - GitHub Copilot and similar tools assist developers but cannot fully replace them yet. Learning to Code - Coding enhances logical thinking and problem-solving skills. - Understanding coding is crucial, even with advanced AI capabilities. Small Teams and Billion-Dollar Companies - AI could enable small teams to build successful companies. - Experienced founders often prefer smaller teams for efficiency and focus. Founders' Evolution - Successful founders transition from engineering to managing teams and processes. - Effective leadership is critical for scaling startups. Role of AI in Enhancing Founders' Capabilities - AI lowers technical barriers, making it easier to start companies. - Founders still need a strong foundation in computer science and engineering. Conclusion AI will ease the process of starting companies, likely leading to more unicorns. Skilled programmers and effective leaders will continue to be essential.

[@REMUSE777]

As a consumer, it's hope-inducing. As an entrepreneur, it's distracting.

[@groundcrewz]

A 100 percent

[@johndank2209]

what do you mean by distracting?

[@LDacic]

@@johndank2209 he has no idea what he means by distracting.. just trying to sound cool

[@gordon2766]

If it’s so easy to start these companies, what makes you think any lasting value is being created?

[@BenCauntyt]

Low barrier to entry does not necessarily imply low value outcomes.

[@GarryTan]

That's up to the founder and whether they created something of value! Easy to start doesn't mean anything other than that technology will permeate more parts of society that normally wouldn't get technology.

[@gordon2766]

@@GarryTan But don't you think all the biggest problems have already been addressed by traditional software approaches? Sure, AI might make it possible for a small team to profitably take on a challenge that previously would have been too small, but the size/value of that market hasn't changed. So why is something now going to be a billion-dollar market with AI as a potential tool, when it wasn't previously? I think it's more likely that AI will prove to be value destroying. For example if a 10-person team somehow replicates all of Salesforce and sells it for pennies, it will crush Salesforce. Sure, maybe that small team can enrich themselves personally, but the net effect will be a decrease in the value of all software companies.

[@meyham9179]

Yea in the short term this may happen, but in the long term we will come up with a lot more new problems to solve. For example consider if someone invented a car and pitched it to business men for commute. First these men would use it to visit their offices in the same town. But due to the fast long distance commute possibilities these cars unlock, they can open offices in adjacent towns and expand their business.

[@BenCauntyt]

@@gordon2766 there is a lot more to software than just the product itself, reputation and trust are hugely important which is why salesforce is so valuable. AI making the cost to develop software cheaper does not mean that the software created is any less value, it only means that the cost overhead is reduced.

[@LazyDotDev]

It's very important to under what Jensen said. He is NOT saying that there will be no use for Computer Science majors or Programmers in the foreseeable future. He is saying that the end game of the industry is to eliminate "Programming" as we now know it. I don't even think Jensen would proclaim to know when this will be possible. However, that is the end goal, to enable any human the ability to program anything using natural language in the same way anyone can now generate an image on demand.

[@nonefvnfvnjnjnjevjenjvonej3384]

he is also smelling his own farts while his stock flies high. lol. a mistake we make time and again to think just because someone has success in one narrow field, that means their views are valid for everything else.

[@LazyDotDev]

​@@nonefvnfvnjnjnjevjenjvonej3384 He's not sharing advice outside of his domain, he runs the leading company for GPU's and has been doing so for decades. His projections on the direction of the computing industry, an area where he and his company will go down in history are taken seriously for a reason. This is not a crypto token project, you will be exposed quickly if you don't know what you're talking about. Regarding his predictions on the future of programming, it's all backed up by what we see today in terms of generative Ai, and consider this the beta release. Humans are not programming with levers anymore, similarly I doubt anyone will be writing CSS or any of its derivatives in 50 years for web development. The rest will follow (JS, Python, insert your fav programming lang), it won't be a dramatic revelation either.

[@sp123]

We will never get rid of programming because it is high level knowledge work. AI can't do that it can only give insight and brainstorming

[@Rammyrich]

@@nonefvnfvnjnjnjevjenjvonej3384Oh, listen to this guy! He knows what he’s talking about, with a KZbin video instead of $100B net worth, $3at AI company, and decades of C-suite experience. Listen to him!

[@allanshpeley4284]

​@@sp123Sounds like copium

[@willmedrano98]

Computer Science != Programming

[@jonathanmelhuish4530]

And software development is more than just writing code. Disappointing to hear them use these terms interchangeably, it shows their thinking is still very fuzzy on this topic.

[@sumitpawar000]

Agreed that CS is not just about programming, however given sufficient knowledge LLMs can create efficient softwares end to end. Atleat the Current progress in AI agents says so..

[@howtoactuallyinvest]

Instagram only had 13 employees when they hit a $1B valuation and that was pre crazy inflation.. you guys should know this. What will be impressive w AI is a billion dollar company w 1 or 2 founders only

[@bharys2237]

Totally possible.

[@MayankGuptaMGIKHD]

Telegram also comes to mind.

[@maximilianrck254]

Did you watch the whole podcast? They mentioned Instagram and later on they switched the perspective that there might be thousands of unicorns with 1-20 employees.

[@aniekanakpanamasi4635]

Using AI to code AI.

[@AmorosoGombe]

It's not just coding knowledge but the general understanding of computer science as a whole, gives you context that you need to come up with products that makes sense for human problems AND are solvable with computing.

[@fintech1378]

@@AmorosoGombe 100%

[@johnstalkernet]

I like the camera/painter metaphor. I think the next phase of this is knowing when/where to lean into the LLM vs let the human paint. More advanced tools don't typically make the previous tools obsolete. Airplanes are more advanced than cars, but we still use cars. The microwave is more advanced than the stovetop but with still cook on stoves, etc... but what we HAVE learned is when/where to use the microwave vs the stove, how best to utilize each. In many areas the human may be preferred to the LLM and vice versa.

[@inflationking1271]

I was a programmer 25 years ago. Done other stuff like consulting, presales and sales then and "lost" my developer skills. With AI I can no build almost everything from a prototype/MVP perspective with low-code/no-code tools. Luckily my partners are full-stack developers that know how to build scalable production systems. Production systems are a different beast for sure.

[@broski120]

Which tools would you use for a consumer facing mobile app?

[@fintech1378]

Not yet

[@genericdeveloper3966]

Good for a prototype that will need to be re-written.

[@inflationking1271]

@@genericdeveloper3966 Facebook was a prototype that was re-writen

[@carloslfu]

I have been a follower of Garry since his beginning on KZbin here. It's incredible that Garry, the CEO, is still part of these videos. That speaks tons about him and YC's current culture! 🙌

[@GoesByStrider]

Yes! This is the topic I’ve been waiting to hear. Many people are saying the software engineer career will die with AI engineers emerging soon . Others are saying “The end of software” as these software products will become quick and easy to build for everyone so prices will go to zero... We need to talk about this more as I see people discussing this everywhere

[@RishPhotography]

The question is not how to do stuff. The question is what to do. That's where the human intuition will come. There will exist a power law in ideas, which right now isn't there because if we could speed up the building process of any idea, we can quickly see if it's worth the effort or not. AI will bridge that gap

[@techsuvara]

The difference between natural language and programming is primarily that programming requires a VERY SPECIFIC COLLECTION OF TERMS to execute the outcome. Natural language however is far more malleable and generic. Hence you can get away with things being a little not as they seem. With programming, you have to be 100% correct in our outcome. Something LLMs don't do at the moment.

[@bakr0x]

This was a really insightful brainstorming session, loved it. Yep totally agree that AI would really help in quickly pushing out more ideas and proof of concepts (from 0 to 1), but you'll still need humans and programmers to scale and sustain such startups or companies.

[@dvs6121]

6:19 - Before MNNs (massive neural nets) engineers used hand coded feature extractors, SVMs, statistical modeling, Frequency Domain represntations, Wavelets, etc.

[@josepinzon1515]

This video came at the right time in my life. TL to explain, but thank you

[@billy-bund]

Interesting comparison with why natural language to SQL hasn’t taken off… I think that’s the first problem Perplexity started working on before pivoting to their current product

[@fintech1378]

So what happened

[@snowcrash-]

Great video.

[@humanamachina9576]

Learning Computer Science is fundamental, like learning language and biology is fundamental for us. We learn english to be able to communicate effectively with one another and biology to understand how we are composed. To create a thought or an idea and pass that to another person, language is used. Computer science, in this particular case, coding, is the direct analog. Other areas in computer science allow us to understand how computers and machines are structured. We will need to understand machines like we understand ourselves. They are after all, mirrors of us but in a different form.

[@danecjensen]

Chapters (Powered by ChapterMe and @danecjensen) - 00:00 - AI programmers reliability, companies workforces 00:32 - Controversy over computer science education 05:16 - Deep learning started with ImageNet benchmark 05:51 - Challenges in machine learning, AlexNets impact, and AI race 08:30 - Coding as an image recognition task 10:17 - Engineering models messy real world 15:06 - Early programming languages coding, assembly, C, Python 18:13 - Learning to code makes LLMs smarter 22:38 - Patrick Hollisons transformation from intense engineer to effective leader 23:47 - Startup founder explains rejection of familylike model 26:01 - Smart founders learn effective leadership skills 27:18 - Oracle cofounder Larry Ellisons path to success 29:20 - Reduced team sizes, efficiency, Jevons paradox 32:29 - Peoples jobs should be freed up for innovation 36:33 - Growing up in Chile, YC changed my life 37:51 - YCs craftspeople build future

[@TheDeviced]

If code can be written by a machine, means it will be cheap. For a billion dollar company code complexity has been a kind of a moat. So code being available to everyone means there will be number of alternatives for the users, including an option to create one themselves. Can it be like clothes, Where one can buy from others or stitch one themselves? What is the product in such scenario?

[@zb2747]

The fundamentals of engineering will always be around. However, I think in my lifetime we will see the dawn of an autonomous world. I think it is good but we must work alongside LLMs and AI and most importantly focus on how we can use such tools to improve systems within our society (i.e education, healthcare, ect...)

[@sidmohan3339]

Thank you for pushing back against the terrible advice. I'm completely self-taught and published apps (and started my own company). I am a sharper thinker and a better business leader for it. The only downside is that I have found coding to be like 'play time' when I was a kid - you can REALLY get lost in it. So I've become a worse husband 🤣

[@emmanueletukudo1213]

Guess we will find out in a couple of years😊

[@moslemson]

Bigger question is how is that $1B valuation received? Another VC and ZIRP induced bubble, it can totally happen. Can there be a $1B+ company with 2 employees which is trading on NASDAQ? Much smaller chance of that happening.

[@faseehqureshi]

It's all about communicating your idea right to the AI (LLM). Non technical people or normal English cannot be used for creating softwares. I created a full stack (MERN) e-commerce store using gpt 3.5 (In pieces not in a single go and content on site was mine obviously and the architecture) . But it took me way much time reasoning and explaining and teaching the model to relate and remember the last response and had to repeat lot of things again and again. But if you can communicate the technical requirements well to the LLM you can create a real full stack app. But you still need to know to put the pieces of the puzzle together remembering the final image of the puzzle. In the end you need to be an engineer to create the software because AI is also a software and only a engineer knows the details and aware of the errors and can actually fix the broken things where there is a need. "Technical English is the key."

[@daniels7771]

I applied to YC a week ago and didn’t hear back yet. Some people get responses in few days. Should I wait or i am rejected?

[@gomini3707]

How does that square with YC insistance on having co-founders ? Chat GPT has been an excellent cofounder for a solo founder like myself.. He's always available, never tires, and the probability of a dispute is zero. The perfect assistant.

[@Cris022]

lol

[@allanshpeley4284]

Always available? I run out of credits every time I try to use it to do any real work.

[@techsuvara]

One thing I have found with AI generated art is, no one wants to buy it, I have not seen anyone purchase an AI generated print. But people spend millions on real paintings and artists prints.

[@ritvikrajesh2959]

During the NFT era they were willing to buy AI Generated Pics

[@LironBerisha]

@@ritvikrajesh2959 because they were NFTs , their intrinsic qualities were insignificant.

[@Buy_YT_Views.129]

Stay positive, amazing things will happen! 🌟

[@ArunKumar-jk5pq]

Programming also evolving & I wouldn’t be surprised if my git repo stores only my prompts. But who will run & maintain existing code. We still have mainframes & cobol.., So Jensen’s future is really far & we have a few generations ahead of us.

[@gregoryneal-qu1tq]

What Garry says between 24:00-25:24 might be the most useful thing you will ever hear in your business life.

[@SheenaAvena]

If we get to that point in the future when any human can create software by telling AI what to build using human language - what will become of SaaS companies? Should we start betting on physical businesses and labor/skills?

[@perbhatkumar7033]

I am not sure if the partners are overlooking this. And I haven't fully thought through the following, but couldn't a generally intelligent enough agent be able to create an initial MVP, and then use metrics and reason to refine software? Would humans input be useful if human usage data can be collected anyways? Could the AI programmer learn '"creativity"?

[@perbhatkumar7033]

This sort of means that the AI would run in a feedback loop, instead of needing to be prompted by humans each time. Kind of like how a human would do it in a build, launch, learn cycle

[@abilashtitus8248]

Hey Y combinator, How long does it take to complete the review process? will you notify if it's get rejected?

[@2pacbigiefan]

Ahh yes, youtube is the perfect place to ask them a question

[@xuanan1779]

Yes they do! See the deadline and they always reply you by that time.

[@abilashtitus8248]

@@2pacbigiefan 🤣😘

[@abilashtitus8248]

@@xuanan1779 Okay, Thank you.

[@fintech1378]

​​@@2pacbigiefandoesnt have to be perfect for him to give a shot

[@rylaczero3740]

Programming can be seen as a formal language in which you specify what your system does. If one believes they can forever get away with using less formal ones, then they are setting themselves up for failure, because nature likes to keep throwing unforeseen scenarios at you and informal ones wont help you see them ahead of time like formal languages and system created using them do. AI goes on top of existing technology( and not replace it), the ones who believe otherwise, including Karpathy and Huang will prove to be mistaken.

[@aryanv6926]

I completely agree with the fact that AI could eventually replace junior developers in simple programming/engineering tasks. The question then is, how does one become a skilled senior engineer without ever being a junior engineer? People are going to try their best to skip the fundamental steps given that it will become automated by AI, but without the fundamentals, you cannot become truly great at something. So, how is one to progress through this journey of becoming a great engineer (which is a difficult and lengthy process), while being able to find work and opportunities to have some level of financial stability (given that it becomes automated by AI), to one day be able to do great work and achieve things that AI cannot. How are we to ensure that there is still a place for people to go through the necessary steps of becoming an expert in the field without having to go through years and years of school as there are going to be no jobs to allow you to gain and monetize on this experience and journey?

[@shynrou2]

This, exactly this is the big problem I also see coming. Not just in software development, but a lot of fields. When asking AI to do something mediocre is enough a lot of current beginner roles will fall away. So you end up having operators and experts, but becoming an expert is barely possible because nobody is paying for it. We already see the same problem with bachelor alumni not being able to get jobs, because they don't have the skills you would learn on the job. Also a lot of juniors will run into this weird place were they want to become an expert, but will end up becoming just an AI operator, because to be productive they will have to overly rely on that.

[@chrisgg]

Currently I feel it is true. I always lacked the skill to code but had the ideas and business background. Yesterday I created a discord bot with Claude and Replit. If this works already today… what will be in 10 years? OFC, kids shouldn’t learn to code.

[@angelocortez1861]

too many gpt wrapper companies

[@ycombinator]

too many mysql wrapper companies ... said nobody ever

[@gordon2766]

@@ycombinator MySQL can’t configure itself. It’s fundamentally different.

[@ahmadwasiqshairzad5481]

LOVE YOU ALL

[@freyna]

"the process of writing is thinking."

[@maximillianphelps]

I am one of these people coding full programs with zero coding knowledge. Your dreams are possible, don’t let them tell you otherwise.

[@nilaydupare6983]

How?

[@user-oc8il6fl6v]

Can you explain more?

[@ycombinator]

How many users do you have? Are they paying for the product?

[@kavyatomar5639]

Oo that's very cool , I would like to know more about this !

[@swapnilchand338]

what are some companies ai or otherwise which have a great employee to valuation ratio? funnily enough Nvidia is at the top.

[@swapnilchand338]

Telegram is one of them 30 employees company

[@dalisochitundu778]

Great topic!!! Keep these coming Gary

[@carloslfu]

English to SQL is solved for the most part, AFAIK.

[@mykolatokariev8260]

[Summary was made with AI] Introduction: The text delves into the state of AI programmers, discussing their reliability, potential impact on employment, and the evolution of programming technology. The conversation also touches on the role of AI in automating jobs and the future of computer science education. Summary: -AI programmers are evolving rapidly, with advancements in developing coding assistance tools and systems. -The text mentions the launch of Devon, an AI programming tool that sparked interest among tech founders. -Benchmark data sets like sbench have played a crucial role in advancing AI programming capabilities, paralleling the impact of ImageNet in the realm of deep learning. -The discussion highlights the breakthrough moment in deep learning with AlexNet, showcasing the transformative power of neural networks. -The evolving landscape of AI programming raises questions about the future balance between human programmers and AI algorithms. Conclusion: The dialogue around AI programmers emphasizes the shift towards human-like programming abilities and the transformative impact on the tech industry. As AI continues to advance, the integration of AI algorithms with human coding expertise will shape the future of programming and technological innovation.

[@devstuff2576]

what LLMs are you people talking about that are sooo impressive in coding to warrant this conversation? I am genuinely curious. What app has been made by just prompting chat gpt?'

[@shancunma6001]

it’s a future conversation, not a present conversation.

[@ycombinator]

Casetext sold for over $600M and is driving real revenue. OpenAI is a YC spin-out and is making $3.4B per year now.

[@azxsys]

Not sure of higher and higher level of abstraction programming language analogy works. There were many attempts at 4th gen languages allowing more abstraction in last 40 years, and it did not fully succeeded. Mainstream 3 gen seems to strike this sweet spot of balance between control, flexibility and abstraction you often need. Also, natural language is very vague and unspecific (if you are not German ☺), arguably biggest value of the developers is in their ability to solve and work around some of that ambiguity into precise solutions/implementation. Think about coding as a tool in a tool belt of a craftsman, knowing how to use a hammer does not make a carpenter out of that person. AI coding assistant might be giving that craftsman a 3d printer or water jet cutter.

[@zes7215]

wr,say, can say x etc any nmw s perfx, doesnt matter

[@shynrou2]

If AI can ever completely replace a senior developer, the job will switch to specification work. Otherwise you will always have to accept subpar results. It's already one of the biggest challenges in development work, aligning the expectation of what exactly is being build and fixing misconceptions. If AI does the coding, a human will still have to check the code to verify, if you ever wanna get decent results. Otherwise it's just going to be bug riddled code full of bad assumptions.

[@boukew]

No craft in copy pasting (usually)

[@shancunma6001]

sometimes it’s easier to train humans than to train LLMs

[@techsuvara]

I tried fumedev, it's not even alpha, let alone beta. It's not even connecting to any repo's.

[@ij9375]

What about software becomes ubiquitous and not as monetarily valuable?

[@JustDurant]

It will get there shortly. With all eyes being on AI and intelligent AI reasoning - the future is bright imo.

[@goku-pops7918]

really not fair to be super smart in the modern age

[@SheenaAvena]

AI looks to be taking interesting, creative, intellectually-stimulating jobs and leaving the butter-passing to us. Where are the butter-passing robots?

[@louis3195]

"AI worker for X" is the new tar pit

[@ronrouyer2069]

Amen. You come to the consumer and customer. Don't make me know source code. On Drawing a cat...maybe that's why Cuban bought that Draw me a cat Co. on sharktank...

[@Unicorpcapitalv]

Awesome 👏

[@entalpa]

LLM's are verry bad at generating Algorithms based on your prompt (Something Unique) for this you need to be smart and LLM's are not smart. But telling LLM to build Boilerplate code for Node.js app with 1 router and 2 controllers (this task they can do good)

[@parishilanrayamajhi4879]

talk about blockchain as well

[@thanatosor]

1 person + AI = Trilion Zimbabwe Dollar Company

[@shashankaggarwal123]

I think you guys need a new definition of the word 'Unicorn'. Very basic mathematics, a Billion dollar 10 years ago are not the same Billion Dollars now. As much credit as you give to tech and other enabling factors which are making more and more 'unicorns' - you have to understand that by definition of being a 'Unicorn' - just gets easier and easier as time goes by. Is new Billion the old Million? Soon enough.

[@sarthakjain5572]

I love y combination

[@michaelmeram6156]

Sup Garry

[@aytekinerdogan1987]

How the hack can you leave comments on a 40-minute video just 3 minutes after it was uploaded?

[@Miguel-zo1th]

27 min in and 14 comments

[@zarbioromulood8854]

They are bots 😂

[@quantum_encrypt]

I watch in x2

[@josueramirez7247]

They comment before watching the whole thing. It’s not a good habit.

[@tethron.]

L̶e̶a̶r̶n̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶C̶o̶d̶e̶ Learn to Cook

[@yashdagade1240]

so I am first lol :D

[@sarthakjain5572]

3

[@sarthakjain5572]

2

[@aryanjain5535]

1st

[@webstervieira3264]

Typical selfish CEO ,if the world depends on NVDIA for programming then they will be in control and there won't be any creativity and innovation so I ama against people depending on AI and this companies for coding, people should learn to code and express their views and creativity without depending on anyone,learn to code and be independent

[@sumitpawar000]

But not using AI will hamper productivity. If we need to keep our pace up with others, then can’t ignore AI ( LLMs)

[@webstervieira3264]

@@sumitpawar000 we shouldn't rely on big companies to give us AI we should learn how to program and be independent,create our own AI not rely on NVDIA to do everything for us

[@sumitpawar000]

@@webstervieira3264 agreed. That’s why I love huggingface.

[@rubes8065]

The most important problem is that you all are solving problems that aren't the real humans problems of our time. You haven't solved homelessness or racism or mental health issues: you've compounded those problems by engineering tech that redistributed wealth to the top, and divides humanity, and will continue to do so at an exponential rate. But I digress and disagree. Coding is a waste of time now, and is different than engineering, although not mutually exclusive, obviously. See the bigger picture, but pay closer attention to the smaller details of the human experience. No one should have to care so much about a line of code. You're missing something big in this conversation. Really big. It's kind of sad how out of touch with most of the world you are. I'm not putting you down at all, you're all seemingly wonderful people. You're just focused on the wrong issues. And saying Jensen is wrong is probably going to show how you didn't take him serious enough. The skills necessary for success are less important than luck of birth and fate. Your children will have that luck. Bless them, but will you be able to teach them to understand and care about everyone else, if they live in a different world?

[@Piliponful]

bro, stop, AI is fucking useless, stop

[@djcardwell]

coding never was important. you're better off understanding math and philosophy.

[@get.ai.enabled]

Linacon? "I'm not sure Linacon will allow that" 33:22

[@fintech1378]

Lina Khan, the tech decels

[@get.ai.enabled]

@@fintech1378 Thanks!