10 Prehistoric Dinosaurs In "65" Movie

[@Ledinosour673]

Those are CGI slurpasaurs

[@liopleurodonthedinoman3637]

There the modern Slurpasaurs

[@Bruce_shark-08]

The "giant theropod" is called fasolasuchus, which is surprisingly a real creature

[@alexthefox1175]

That’s what you get if you mix a cheetah and a alligator in one

[@weronikapietras-nogal]

​@@alexthefox1175and make it 20 meters long.

[@Floridahehe]

The dsungaripterus is so amazingly accurate.

[@paleoguy2165]

Don’t know why they bothered to make a really good lookin dsungaripterus with fuzz and all yet abandoned the dinosaurs to be monstrous abominations

[@Floridahehe]

@@paleoguy2165 to be honest, I really liked the designs in the movie, but I respect your opinion.

[@simbiotesnus1013]

Actually, Dsungaripterus is pretty inaccurate too, seriously, it has eyes in its nostrils.

[@Floridahehe]

@@simbiotesnus1013 yeah but compared to the other creatures on the movie is pretty accurate.

[@thejoker15678]

@@Floridahehe Not all of them, like, the Fasolasuchus in 65 was 10 meters long, it was way muscular and scary than it’s normal counterpart.

[@thejoker15678]

These long-legged animals are Lagosuchus, Lagosuchus has a slender body, with long legs. That big dinosaur is Fasolasuchus, it just looks muscular and scary, and 10 meters long, it resembles the real animal, but with some proportions of a theropod.

[@CctvSpyk]

The baby dinosaur is actually an sub-adult jakapil

[@thejoker15678]

@@CctvSpyk Well, sub-adult means when you are similar to an adult, but still not fully adult.

[@CctvSpyk]

@@thejoker15678 thanks for info 😁👍

[@nicolastubaraobicalho670]

Cool

[@joshuaball5916]

The "Nothosaurus" looked more like Lagosuchus.

[@liopleurodonthedinoman3637]

The soundtrack calls the Nothosaurus a Lagosuchus

[@alex18xd59]

I Really Liked Me this Movie PS:And the Troodon

[@thejoker15678]

I learned that the Thyreophoran was Jakapil, look at the body. Jakapil possesses traits from other dinosaurs, like, having a body looking like a theropod's body, armor and beak looking like Ankylosaurus's, and small, stubby arms looking like Abelisaurus's

[@nicolasarrua-hd9se]

Jakapil Deadly Eel Velociraptor Oviraptor Pteranodon Dsungaripterus Ankylosaurus Nothosaurus Giant Therapod T-rex

[@jacobcox4565]

The most accurate animals in this movie were the Dsungaripterus, which we only got to see for less than a minute of total screentime, and they're not even dinosaurs!

[@nilkadesiree6304]

The first one I think is a jakapil also the velociraptor isn’t a velociraptor it’s a pyroraptor then the other wasn’t a nothasaurus it’s a lagosuchus and the giant therapod is actually fasolasuchus and the T. rex had 2 fingers and it was smaller than the fasolasuchus :)

[@paleoguy2165]

The first one was likely a jakipil. It wasn’t a baby as it was seen moving in a herd. Also 0:38 that wasn’t a velociraptor, and 0:48 it wasn’t an oviraptor. This didn’t take place in Asia so those aren’t velociraptor and oviraptor it’s likely acheroraptor and anzu 1:02 when did pteranodon appear? 1:25 when did ankylosaurus appear? 1:40 ok I know that thing doesn’t resemble anything from the Kate Cretaceous of America but if we’re jumping back in time to the Triassic for reference then the lagosuchus is a far better match than a nothosaurus

[@Pendejos456]

Yeah i thinked also that acherroraptor and anzu where the creatus on the film , so basicly whe both are sure that this film is on hell creek , oh and well , actually is kinda strange see a lagosuchus with 3 or 4 meters long when the real one is 40 to 60 centimeters long

[@sashabertasius1046]

The trankylosaurus is jakapil The nothosaurus is lagosuchus And the giant theropod is fosalosuchus

[@simbiotesnus1013]

Some errors: Ankylosaurus and Pteranodon don't appear in the film; The Oviraptor is shown here incorrectly, in the film it was much larger and had a different design; the quadropid small carnivores are Lagosuchus, not Nothosaurs.

[@OhomemSapo]

And yet another mistake: the drawing of dsungaripterus in the video has its eyes correctly placed on top of its head, whereas in the film, Has eyes incorrectly placed where their nostrils should be.

[@simbiotesnus1013]

Also, the small armored dinosaur in the movie had cloub on its tail, the Raptor (species unknown) looks like JP Velociraptor in this animation, the T. Rex in the movie has small two-fingered hands, not the long three-fingered hands shown here.

[@Pendejos456]

but , wasent the anzu the oviraptorid that apppeared on the movie ???

[@randomchannel2926]

the tranklyosaurus is actually a jakapil

[@Shades_salmon]

We can think of a way that oversized theropod could be a huge notho?

[@allotallosaurus7652]

Bro called a postosuchus a giant theropod even tho therapods stand on 2 legs

[@x.spinosaurus3951]

What's the background noise in 0:10-0:24?

[@nicolastubaraobicalho670]

Attack on titan size comparation

[@thomassizemore5814]

I have a headache now

[@namastewrye952]

That's not a T. rex, but might be a distant member of tyrannosaurs, likes more like an Eotyrannus descendant to me

[@CctvSpyk]

65's Trex design has three digits (fingers) on it's arm ?

[@archosaur_enjoyer824]

Pteranodon did not appear in 65

[@x.spinosaurus3951]

How do you know if ankylosaurus and pteranodon are in the movie?

[@enderblaze7068]

The giant Thera pod is fasolasuchus

[@Mr.PaleoGuy]

C'mon guys you guys have no idea of paleontology the first dinosaur was not some trankysaur it was actually a jakapil And Nothosauraus was actually A lagosuchus Now I hope you guys are okay

[@derickhuynh2789]

Nothosaurus , It look like laosuchus

[@simbiotesnus1013]

You are right, it is Lagosuchus.

[@GreenSpinosaur55]

did you know that there was a woolly mammoth in 65

[@darnellturner6915]

I saw it at the end

[@GreenSpinosaur55]

@@darnellturner6915 i know right

[@Jurassic-boyyy23]

Actually the trankylosaurus is actually a jakapil 0:10

[@sashabertasius1046]

True

[@dranjitadubey2]

Dude it's not a baby trankylosaurus it's a jakapil !!!

[@spiderzillacantpostbecausebusy]

Therapod is a postosuchus

[@samsonarshaw2712]

Tyrannopelta, 0:14. Pumilionychus, 0:33. Hari no Ha, 0:45. Opticopterus, 1:09. Arborosuchus, 1:41. Tyrannosuchus, 1:51.

[@PhatNguyen-tf7lu]

Tututu

[@GreenSpinosaur55]

there is not an ankylosaurus

[@abhirajsingh587]

Bro ankylosaurus is not in 65

[@witty7147]

It is

[@witty7147]

It iS just really bad

[@abhirajsingh587]

Bro ankylosaurus is scrapped dinosaurs in 65

[@Vasilis516]

There's only carnivores in the movie

[@liopleurodonthedinoman3637]

The Jakapil (Tyrankylosaurus) is a herbivore, but it’s probably an omnivore

[@tripodwotw7648]

0:14 thats a jakapil

[@simbiotesnus1013]

Most likely not.

[@OhomemSapo]

1:13 I love how even the animator knows where the dsungaripterus's eye should be Unlike the dsunga in the movie who have their eyes where their nostrils should be. 65 is a rotten movie.

[@ToEzHazardREX]

bruh they all are inaccurate and they are just prediction

[@t-rexstudioproductions781]

1:53 It's called a Postosuchus

[@x.spinosaurus3951]

In fictional (Tyrannosuchus)

[@Cyn-555-ty]

Why I am Y65 was a good movie because it got one thing right with the T. Rex tiny arms you are making them way too long make them like a human's arm With 2 fingers not 3 Unsubscribe immediately

[@S0LAAARRRRR]

veloci is unrealistic it should be smaller and have a full featherd body

[@Floridahehe]

The size doesn't look wrong, but the appearence looks.