10 SNIPERS vs 100x Every Unit | Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator

[@georgefloydspaceshuttlepro1839]

The snipers would alternate shots at the center of the advancing enemy and then the outside edge. This keeps a more systematic decimation happening and keeps the snipers from panicking or freezing up.

[@georgefloydspaceshuttlepro1839]

@וה גבורה וה גבורה what kind of gibberish alphabet do you come from?

[@georgefloydspaceshuttlepro1839]

@וה גבורה וה גבורה none of your responses have any relevance to the posting I made. Also the posting I made had zero bigotry in it so what is your issue Also does your hebrew letters translate to Joop Yubehead?

[@thinkforyourself2109]

The chances of the charge succeeding seemed to depend on the speed of the units in reaching the snipers, the number of the charging force, and their capacity to take fire and fire back; this is why the calvary won but initial foot soldiers lost. The zombies won, for example, because they run fast.

[@Buses2Bikes]

Is it my imagination or did the Giant Ogres start out WAY closer than everyone else to the snipers? And what were the snipers firing...muskets? That was some seriously slow rate of fire even for a 1940's K98

[@niklask7635]

There's no way a fully trained military sniper would miss so many shots at targets moving in straight lines

[@tforaodg]

It's a game. Also, they normally will hide somewhere. Keep moving and shooting.

[@jenniferrobinson4277]

As a sniper, they'd make good junior assistant cooks

[@johnadams-wp2yb]

It would help the 'snipers' immensely if they learned how to shoot FASTER.

[@RajkumarY665]

There aim is not good either

[@johnadams-wp2yb]

@@RajkumarY665 You're right

[@arandomman9934]

this is just a game

[@johnadams-wp2yb]

@@arandomman9934 Not very realistic is it ?

[@arandomman9934]

@@johnadams-wp2yb not very smart of you to be complaining about a game is it?

[@boomschofield3148]

The true sniper would NEVER take his shots offhand (standing)!!! Even WWII German Sniper's when deployed would be VERY difficult to see and would be on the high ground under cover and concealment, probably with a spotter armed with either an SMG or another rifle and grenades. The Era is important; pre-1943 German Sniper's usually utilized 98 Mausers (bolt actions, that were deadly accurate) with good optics; post 1943 German Snipers would probably have G43's Semi-Automatic 10 shot stripper clip fed box magazine scoped rifles which would do better in this scenario. Their Recon Teams would have set them up in a position running North to South or vice versa to minimize the Coriolis effect and they would be capable of accurate fire of up to a mile! They were a Superb Sniper Corp! The 7.92×57mm Mauser (8X57mm) rifles were powerful, unless you had well trained counter snipers (appropriately armed) or Tanks/Artillery, they would bring your movements to a Halt! Not only would you not get close, you wouldn't move or resupply. They wouldn't care if you deployed Greek Fire or not! They would keep you at distance and if shear numbers over whelmed them (and I'm talking thousands to one) melt!

[@АлексейЛукашов-т7г]

Интересная идея!! но курочек жалко ((( а Динозавры молодцы) предки отомстили)

[@littleredbowtie2788]

Snipers shoot from cover and there seam to be no double are even triple kills considering how tightly packed advancing army's where attacking

[@dylanvaliente406]

5000 heavi knight 5000 wildmwn 3000 cavallery vs 3000 centaur 1500 rinos 1500 gigant ogre 5500 spierman 5500 lizarmen in the wall greet me

[@littleredbowtie2788]

Oh what where these snipers using musket guns 😆

[@LlorDrei]

Wish they could have actually had 10 snipers vs 100 of every unit... By which I mean, 1 of each unit, but from 100 units, all at the same time, to see if they could have succeeded where 100 of a single unit failed.

[@TERRENCEJJR]

Smart.

[@mikeeforma2281]

Chickens are a bit worse than Romans and Spartans but they are great anyway! 👍

[@Kratill_Mahata]

Can u simulate a Jedi vs Chuck Norris please?

[@adamlewis5700]

Some of these aren’t even close 15 or 20 snipers may have made it more fair.

[@eddievangundy4510]

The best simulation, the best music!

[@deathsnitemaresinfullust2269]

Haa! Why do i keep staring at these videos? 😄👍 Edit. T-Rex don't give a Damn!😆👍

[@ryandowning2750]

Those archers would all be dead before they fired a shot. Many of those 50 cal. sniper rounds would pass through multiple people increasing casualty rates

[@Antesdelfinadmin]

Worst "snipers" I've ever seen!

[@odenslaw7247]

Also the rate of fire would be faster

[@Bodneyblue]

The weather forcast.."Mostly Sunny..with Some Sun"?..🤔..Ok..😄.....hehehe!.

[@harvey1954]

10 Samuri warriors vs. 1,000 pizza delivery boys

[@danbradley7176]

My biggest disappointment was that we never got to see what the chickens could do once they closed ranks with the snipers.

[@phillipsheppard5361]

True “sniper’s” would not be standing in a firing line, or in the middle of a battlefield. They’d find an elevated covered position, an be completely concealed. Subsequently the actual act of locating them would be time consuming. Additionally, since there are 10 of them they’d be located in various different places, not in one single spot. The premise of the experiment is flawed.

[@peterlee5539]

it will depend on the distance between snipers and the targets.

[@DavidPhilipBaldock]

They wouldn’t carry enough ammo. And who’s leading the medieval army? Wouldn’t they flank the modern soldiers instead of trying to ride over dead horses?

[@tzstudios3505]

Laser knights lol

[@ShihanShiya156]

This isn't fair at all at least their must be 20 snipers

[@серхио-с2з]

Great Games

[@odenslaw7247]

Snipers woul not be standing in the open would have cover and would be spread out

[@carpediemarts705]

I really wanted to see what sort of damage the chickens deal at make range.

[@RajkumarY665]

They look like a WW1 army

[@VentiVonOsterreich]

12:45 - 13:42 the anime GATE in a nutshell

[@dmonte012]

Even the redcoats using muzzle loaders were shooting faster than the snipers.... LAME

[@donaldburkhard7932]

Sniper fire distance but slow. No grenades.

[@orangutan1157]

You should allowed one not to be shot so we can see how he chicken out

[@68Trimax]

100 wild men overcome 10 elite snipers :)

[@ТёмаТёмны]

Прикол: мушкеты эффективнее чем плазменные пушки :-\

[@GhostsOfTheAngelcynn]

That's not fair. Snipers would be pretty ineffective if the knights didn't start at range. Mate try again at shield wall range.... 30 yards Knight win.

[@jenniferrobinson4277]

They couldn't carry a shield that would stop a bulllet at 400 yards

[@GhostsOfTheAngelcynn]

@@jenniferrobinson4277 ill put it differently... Make the battle at a range more suited to the knights. Not the snipers. Say like 30 - 40 yards. Shield wall range, up close and personal. Where you can see your own reflection in their eyes.

[@jenniferrobinson4277]

Ok, let's look at this from a sniper's pov. He would deploy 1000 yards from his target and lie in camouflage. He would have 2 long firearms and a handgun, usually a 300 win magnum or similar bolt action, an ar15 with auto capability and a semi auto 10mm or 40 cal. Personally a 300 win mag would fell three or 4 at 1000 yards per discharge if used against a group. A group of people wearing tin armour and carrying a shield made of wood with a tin front would be as vulnerable as naked babies. They may be determined, but carrying all that weight 1000 yards in a charge would take its toll. I reckon I could dispose of say 200 soldiers deployed like that before they gave up. The snipers would also be deployed on a ridge 50 yards aparr. Peferably up a steep slope. If some "knights" managed to get close, a grenade or two would roll them. The reason warfare is so lopsided in places like Afghanistan is the enemy don't wear uniforms and the natives think of the soldiers as intruders, but we still can't shoot unless they are actively armed.

[@GhostsOfTheAngelcynn]

@@jenniferrobinson4277 yes and my point is, if the snipers started at medieval battle range they'd be wiped out. Guns, rifles and side arms included. Medieval warfare started at 100 yards tops.... Get me? Snipers would be dead. Simple.

[@URSCSAN]

These are worst snipers I’ve ever seen

[@zenverak]

If the snipers shot the front of a charge down, it would have slowed down tremendously or many would have fallen down

[@farshidnmz865]

How do you make thise?

[@asdrubalanibal6853]

“The Charge Of The Duck Brigade”

[@K3Flyguy]

You do realize that snipers went through basic arms training and know about grenades, rockets and claymore mine placement right....?

[@ricardorobertotarrio4893]

Dónde conduce está pavada??

[@lll7987]

Капец: Сорострельность снайперов как у танка!!!

[@hectorbalbuena2560]

Si no saben donde están tendrían ventaja

[@teemum.9023]

2nd world war germans sound funny

[@boedude8496]

those are not snipers, just guys standing side by side with bolt actions shooting slowly while out in the open

[@carlosalbertoferreira1000]

Por esse siulador arqueiros seriam as unidades mais fodas das galaxias. Só nao sei porque nao existem mais essas unidades kkkkkk

[@bosz2667]

Archers wouldn't get near sniper or tanks for that matter wtf

[@ابوعليالعراقي-س1ض]

🤣

[@jamesneil217]

Game name please

[@flp6126]

10 snipers will beat any 100 coming in the open lmao they will be dead in a matter of 1 min or 2

[@jalgasaripov6647]

Ериккенлер

[@ΤάκηςΚωστοπουλος-κ5λ]

BS....

[@안양최고]

They're saying freedom when they are fighting.

[@jon_nomad]

Very unrealistic... Even wild boar hunters can do a better job.

[@walerij7655]

Хреновые снайперы

[@ubervin]

what sniper would choose to stand in an open dessert?