100 vs 155 vs 200 gr Broadhead Penetration Battle! (Ballistic Gel) WHICH WILL WIN?

[@chadsyl23]

Good points on the ballistic gel.

[@RichValentine1972]

Why not shoot the un used tell not the shot up side?

[@outdoors-fun]

If you are shooing the gel, it needs to be thick enough to stop the bolt before the fletching stops the bolt. Otherwise the fletching skews the data.

[@dawheele1]

Your results are what's to be expected because the bow creates the same energy no matter the arrow. Heaver arrows are slower and lighter arrows are faster, no difference in penetration.

[@B_r_u_c_e]

Thank you.

[@camthecameraman5096]

Interesting stuff

[@jimmyBurnett]

Thanks for your test, told me a lot. No real difference. I'm going for speed I don't know if that's a real difference either. I guess I get the cheapest and zero it in. No mechanical for me.

[@ccreed01]

Still sticking with K2-Fixed 155 grain. It has been devastating on deer for me.

[@cray-z7404]

Ballistic gel & foam targets are designed to stop bullets ,/ arrows ,/ bolts but a deer is not... there's truly not a huge significant difference though !!!

[@HuntrPat]

Why did you skip 125 grain

[@afflictorbroadheads6259]

We found that with our testing setup, that 25 grains did not make much difference in penetration or drop out to about 38 yards so we went with 50 so viewers could get a solid idea of the physics of the physics while skipping the 125 and 175.

[@kevinbrannon543]

Why are u the only person testing ur own broadheads...something not right

[@MarvinWafflehouse91]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/fIWzhqmkhMeEibMsi=UJgG6QO1kNe4iMCn