The Error of Dispensationalism | Does the Bible teach that the church replaces Israel?

What is the error of dispensationalism? What is dispensationalism anyway? Are the seven dispensations supported by Scripture in its culture and context? Does the Bible teach that the church really replaces Israel? Is Peter the rock the church is built upon? Join us as we look at these and other potential problems with one of the most common theological frameworks in mainstream Christianity.
www.119ministr...
Follow the above link to partner with 119 Ministries and support ongoing free teaching production.
If you would like to discuss this video with us, we invite you to join the discussion on the teaching page found on our website or reach us privately through the Contact Us form on our website: 119ministries.c...
Thank you so much for your continued and prayerful support. May YHWH bless you and keep you.
Shalom

[@RainCountryHomestead]

Thank you again for another great teaching. Really is helping me understand the errors in the teachings I was raised in and realize how much more sense the WHOLE word means to me now

[@Lamarck922]

This makes sense to me. I was woefully unaware of these things but started waking up during the planned-demic and now correct understanding of scripture and being obedient to the Word is all I care about! Thank you for your clear method of teaching

[@ellenlefavour628]

Coming to see our true identity in Yeshua as Israel is so exciting as it opens up the whole word of Yah to include us, and removes all those bothersome little contradictions to evangelical Christianity sprinkled throughout the scriptures. Excellent teaching as always.

[@christopherhorner9380]

Thank you 119 Ministries for another excellent teaching. Glory to God for yall.

[@maloulaspinas1187]

Thank you 119 Ministries. Shabbat Shalom.

[@geridannels1701]

Thank you, 119 Ministries

[@jamesmunn8144]

Great revised teaching in a compressed time. Will serve well for home groups to study in one or two meetings. Shalom from Tokyo.

[@amandadewet4022]

Unsaved Jews are Israel. They are not the Church. Born again Jews and Gentiles make up the Church. God is in covenant with Israel. He has not rejected them even though they have rejected Him. Once the fulness of the Gentiles comes in He will deal with them. They are His Choosen people. Born again people are His Children. Jews are under law. We are under grace but demonstrate our faith by obeying the moral law not ritualistic ceremony or laws.🎉

[@quicksilver2890]

Such a soothing sound to hear the truth spoken for a change, what a great channel! Keep up the good work guys!

[@karenp.2316]

A clear scriptural teaching. Thank you and Shabbat shalom!

[@jjxenon]

This is an important subject because other doctrines rest on this subject. Good vid 👍

[@kayjewelers9999]

Please answer, if they're the same who did Yah use to provoke Israel to jealousy?

[@BrownBrown270]

To hear them tell it, themselves. Peter and James made a clear distinction in James 1:1 1 Peter 1:1

[@John8_36]

Provoke the nation Israel to jealousy by giving glory to the gentiles that become both Spiritual and Physical Israel. You see this happening throughout book of Acts, the Jews deniers of Christ (physical Israel) fight the Jews believers in Christ (physical and spiritual Israel) and the converted gentiles (now grafted in the physical and spiritual Israel), being jealous of them because now they could do miracles, worship Yahuah, be healed and so on. This is a spiritual understanding, if you stay in your flesh you won’t be able to see it.

[@porchlights2268]

Thank you for this message! I can certainly confirm that having believed in Dispensational teaching took away SO much! I have only just come to this realization in the last couple of weeks after watching a video entitled 'Identity Crisis' by Passion for Truth ministries. All of a sudden, the light bulb in my heart turned on!! Dispensational and Right Dividing teaching 'seemed' so right, but in reality, it 'took' away SO much! We were no longer 'sheep', Jesus was not our King The Kingdom was not for us, Only Paul's letters were written to us, Baptism no longer needed, Obedience to God's Torah... no longer needed.....and on and on. Thank you, Father, for opening my eyes to see! Suddenly, ALL of Scripture is for us... and it is beautiful! ❤

[@GlennJudah]

Thanks 119 !

[@dougbell9543]

Sadly, dispensationalism has foolishly replaced Christ with re-emerged national Israel as the sacred epicentre of biblical prophecy. ✔️

[@leannewheeler5351]

I started attending a Baptist bible study and they are "teaching" on Christ return being centered around Israel and how the politcal leaders have been strategically placed for the downfall of society and Christ soon return. It's a strange experience.

[@PeaceNinja007]

It’s also their fault we’re at the brink of WWIII

[@AidenRKrone]

It's ironic how covenantalists, who correctly realize that the Church and Israel are the same entity, teach supersessionism and yet believe in the continuation of the Law (or at least parts of it), but dispensationalists, who deny the premise that Israel and the Church are the same entity, reject supersessionism and yet believe that the Law has been abrogated. Dispensationalism and covenantalism are mixed up! The correct understanding of the relationship between the Church and Israel is olive tree theology, i.e. the assertion that Gentile followers of Jesus have been grafted into the Abrahamic olive tree.

[@godisreality7014]

Israel is a people, scattered. Messiahs disciples were Israelites of Galilee and called "Galileans". "jews" are Esau and anti-Christ, that is why they crucified Him.

[@doudigit1951]

I agree with you, brother. I agree with his comments on dispensationalism, but then he switched to the law and not grace. I assume that he is a Seventh Day Adventist. To much legalism and not enough grace.

[@Rvshvd321]

@@doudigit1951 grace is not being killed for being disobedient to Torah while inheriting eternal life.

[@GraniteChief369]

Its not 'replacement theory', its fulfillment theology. Labels are used to marginalize open discussion.

[@thechronicillnessdiaries2773]

Fulfillment doesn't equal abolished.

[@DUTTORMPS]

The distinction between Israel and the Church is the fact Israel was separated from Gentiles, under the dispensation of Grace, the covenant of Grace all are welcomed. HUGE DISTINCTION

[@CRRBennett]

Reading comments becomes overwhelming. Thank you for this great explanation. As with denominations I think there are varying views with in dispensationalism. Regardless I so not want to be labeled one or as I am finding any label as I may disagree with some things and agree with other things. Im finding this journey can be difficult at times. I do appreciate yoir videos and teachings!

[@amandadewet4022]

Sorry it did not originate with Plymouth Bretheren. The book of Galations Paul addressed this before anyone wrote about this. Go back to the word.

[@godisreality7014]

Paul is not reliable on some issues. Particularly on the subject of Israel.

[@getx1265]

Loved the easy to understand explanation of this crazy doctrine I grew up with.

[@godisreality7014]

Dispensatanalism accommodates Esau and his god, the anti-Christ (satan).

[@EricGadia-r3i]

Thank God for the front of the book and the back of the book, the scriptures

[@irwinlagare9909]

i just finished Monte Judah’s series about Messianic Teaching for Christians which concluded debnking dispensationalism. Whew. YHWH is on the move

[@joeadrian2860]

This is so well done! I am definitely sharing this around.

[@amandadewet4022]

Who is Israel that is blinded?Romans 11: 25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.

[@godisreality7014]

Israel is not blinded. I am of Jacob-Israel and I am no longer blind. Ask yourself: who is dwelling in the tents of Shem? Why does the "church" teach that anti-Christ is the "chosen" of God? "Gentiles", "jews" and "goy" are fictions hiding the true identities of Israel and Esau.

[@Th3Pr0digalS0n]

Thanks for all you do.

[@alfredgilmore4403]

How long is teaching. I am so Disturbed and full of emotion. Is there any place in North Carolina. That I can go and hear more of this teacher

[@travislaborde2465]

I've never met a dispensationalist that believes that the church replaces Israel. As a matter of fact, one of the best tenets of it is a recognizing that this is not the case, like so many in the "reformed" tradition teach.

[@Watchmanonthewall77]

I totally agree. You have to completely ignore chapters of Paul's writing to believe this heretical teaching.

[@AidenRKrone]

@@Watchmanonthewall77 Dispensationalists are strongly opposed to supersessionism, yes, but when they claim that the Mosaic Law has been replaced by the Law of Christ, and that the Old Covenant has been replaced by the New Covenant, and that salvation and grace are from the Church rather than from Israel, that sounds an awful lot like a form of supersessionism, does it not?

[@Watchmanonthewall77]

@@AidenRKrone okay, i must ask, and i may have missed it in the video; but, what is supersessionism? Im a continuationist as far as Spiritual gifts are concerned👀

[@Watchmanonthewall77]

@@AidenRKrone also, i am a dispensationalist. But i do not believe the church replaced Israel. The gentiles were grafted into the olive tree but Israel rejected the gospel. Its the same church but Israel does not accept Jesus was Messiah. Christ fulfillment of the law on the cross and our faith in that free's us from the bondage of the law. And yes, the scripture shows that God did make a new covenant. Jer 31:31 thru 34

[@JmJendtimes]

​@@Watchmanonthewall77the law is not bondage...it is life. The Bible/God is very very clear on this fact, and that it would never pass away until all is fulfilled. All has not been fulfilled. The law is not bondage!!!! It is to be more desired than gold, much fine gold. Yhr only thing that was 'nailed to the cross' was the death/wrath we deserve for transgressing God's perfect instruction...which leads to blessings. Please do notbe misled,God never changes and His ways, all of them,are perfect.

[@lookupfromdownunder5218]

Dispensationalism DOES NOT SAY THE CHURCH REPLACES ISRAEL! It simply says that God deals with man differently in different times. This is absolutely what the Bible teaches!!!!!!! God bless from Norm in Sydney Australia.....

[@truthblitz7]

I agree with so much of what you teach. I am NOT a dispensationalist. However scripture is also so clear that national Israel will play a role at the end of time. The true scriptural tensions arise by those who "spiritualize" the clear prophetic passages in the old testament which place the land and nation of Israel at the epicenter at the end of time. It is those who deny the role Israel will play in the end times who are teaching faulty theology. Pre millenial doctrine is very clearly taught by scripture. A 1000 year reign is also clear from scripture.

[@amandadewet4022]

The old Testament people were righteous by faith even there the law could not save them.

[@godisreality7014]

God gave the 10 commandments, "the law" of the Edomite Pharisees is talmudic and satanic. John 7.21-23, Matthew 15.3, John 10.34-38.

[@KYAg227]

excellent! Shabbat Shalom

[@Nameless-w2t]

Well spoken brotha

[@Shinehead3]

Thank You for including the Hebrew Word Qahal קהל aka Qehillah קְהִלָּה 😊 Shabbat Shalom 😁

[@AnneTaylor-kk8ze]

That is why i don’t attend church,because i found the teachings misleading and not scripture based

[@godisreality7014]

Amen. "the church" is anti-Christ and slanted toward Esau who has stolen the birthright. The "church" does not teach the truth but rather robs us of both it and our true Identity as the children of Jacob-Israel!

[@unlimitedfreedom6500]

What about the council in Acts 15?

[@leawilliams8476]

The New Covenant is not the Old Covenant reformed. It completely replaces the Old. Jesus said that new wine cannot be stored in old wine skins. But to be reborn and so the remnant of Israelites who saw and heard Jesus and believed are the branches that remain in the fig tree that is the body of Christ Jesus and represent corporate Israel as the newly born church. The remaining Israelites who rejected Jesus as their messiah were the branches broken off and would be grafted in the same way as gentiles are should they believe.

[@trulyso734]

Yes Amen!

[@lindabrotherton1225]

This is a great teaching very hard if you don't keep up .

[@grantcourtney4916]

To say that dispensationalists and those who listen to dispensational teaching are those who have "itching ears", spoken of in 2 Timothy 4:3, is misleading if you ask me.

[@davidrexford586]

Everything is backwards and those who believed what they used to believe is considered heresy and it is what it is..

[@robertkubis2799]

That is in contrary to what One For Israel teaches. An I agree with the 119, how can people have a distinction in the eyes of God, and have two different sets of rules? When, there is only One Kingdom of God, and Torah is its constitution. Why, would the Jews have the life, the way and the truth = Torah and the Gentiles only the Noah laws. All of a sudden, the pork is healthy to eat for all of us? And the shrimp is a pool of vitamins? Since when? Do we really believe that after Messiah's death all animals are clean? And this is just to scratch the surface.What about the rest of the laws? Don't they expose our nakedness? Our sinful nature? Why would I want to keep Sunday, when it's contrary to the Law of God? to make other men happy and important in their roles? Why would the Rabbis tell me that I'm a gentile and I don't need to keep the Torah, and yet what is great for them, is not good enough for me? Why? Why, there is a division? Why would they want to keep it to them selves only? Are we not grafted in? If we embrace the Messiah? I'm just so frustrated and I had many situations and talks, and yet feel isolated. Sometimes I feel that nobody gets it, or most of the so called educated pastors and Rabbis. Pastors promote what has been concluded by Jerusalem Council, that the gentiles coming into the faith are only to do the following things: abstain from blood, food sacrificed to idols, sexual immorality and meat of strangled animals, but, if you read on the next verse it says that they will learn the rest in synagogs every Shabbat where Moses (torah) is being preached.

[@godisreality7014]

"jews" are not Hebrews as Esau is not Jacob-Israel. Messiah was crucified by "jewish" ESAU, who has his own "laws": John 7.21-23, John 10.34-38, Matthew 15.3 "the talmud" is anti-Christ and the church with its "dispensatanalism" is covering up the truth. How can the anti-Christ be "the chosen" of Christ? How can anyone in their right mind believe this? It is pure indoctrination that defies reality.

[@KennethRamirez-k2y]

I do agree that there is one olive tree, but when you’re talking about grafting in and grafting out, that sounds like dispensation

[@dfkuz]

This is for the channel creator: can salvation be lost through disobedience or the failure to keep believing?

[@leawilliams8476]

So you teach against the judaising impact of Dispensationalism and then you teach the Christians to obey the mosaic law? How Judaic of you. Jesus and the apostles taught us how to relate to the law and you are teaching error. From one error into an even deeper error.

[@j1mbobtech]

Two Scriptures (out of many) as a Witness "...Eph 2:10 For we are his workmanship, created in Yehoshua H3091 (Christ Jesus) unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them. Eph 2:11 Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands; Eph 2:12 That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world..." "...Jer 12:14 Thus saith the LORD against all mine evil neighbours, that touch the inheritance which I have caused my people Israel to inherit; Behold, I will pluck them out of their land, and pluck out the house of Judah from among them. Jer 12:15 And it shall come to pass, after that I have plucked them out I will return, and have compassion on them, and will bring them again, every man to his heritage, and every man to his land. Jer 12:16 And it shall come to pass, if they will diligently learn the ways of my people, to swear by my name, The LORD liveth; as they taught my people to swear by Baal; then shall they be built in the midst of my people. Jer 12:17 But if they will not obey, I will utterly pluck up and destroy that nation, saith the LORD..."

[@samthomas9468]

You are not correctly dividing the Word of God. You are denying certain explicit teaching of the Word of God and quoting random versus without explaining it.

[@SusansRoadLessTraveled]

For anyone here arguing that Yeshua nailed the law to the cross and you don’t have to Shema (hear and obey) the Messiah, then who’s the Lawless One in 2 Thes 2? “And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of his mouth and destroy by the splendor of his coming. and in every sort of evil that deceives those who are perishing. They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved.” Ps 119:142 “Your righteousness is an everlasting righteousness and your Torah (law) is Truth.” Revelation 19:11-16 “11 Then I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse! The one sitting on it is called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he judges and makes war. 12 His eyes are like a flame of fire, and on his head are many diadems, and he has a name written that no one knows but himself. 13 He is clothed in a robe dipped in[b] blood, and the name by which he is called is The Word of God. 14 And the armies of heaven, arrayed in fine linen, white and pure, were following him on white horses. 15 From his mouth comes a sharp sword (His Word which He used to dispel Satan in the wilderness) with which to strike down the nations, and he will rule[c] them with a rod of iron. He will tread the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God the Almighty. 16 On his robe and on his thigh he has a name written, King of kings and Lord of lords.”

[@godisreality7014]

There are the commandments of God and then there is "the law" of the pharisees, who are Esau and anti-Christ.

[@markputt8887]

Try to tell people that you can not go to the temple and we are the temple, feasts are impossible to obey, so you can pretend or rehearse but in no way is it guarding or keeping. Is there a scripture to keep the feasts outside of Israel? The oral law of baptizing is outside of torah, it started from a verse in EZ. 38 and after Babylon and was done in many different ways and often. At least 3 times a year minimum.....how many times a year do you get baptized? While Jesus did may of the oral customs, He fulfilled many verses outside of Torah and fewer inside of Torah. What rules are followed today? Paul listed behaviors. A man of God is… A faithful servant must be blameless, vigilant, sober, of good behavior, hospitable. Not given to wine, no striker, not greedy, patient, not a brawler, not covetous having a good report of them which are without, grave, not double tongued, having faith in a pure conscience. Partial list in 1 Tim. ..These are just some questions I have had recently.

[@godisreality7014]

Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean: from all your filthiness, and from all your idols, will I cleanse you. Ezekiel 36.25. Water was always used to cleanse and still is. Messiah is the living waters.

[@amandadewet4022]

Current Israel is not the Church. This is a fact. Current unbelieving Israel is still God's choosen people. Once the fulness of the Gentiles comes in God will deal with unsaved Israel.

[@godisreality7014]

the jew is not Israel, he is ESAU. God´s people are His disciples, those who translated the Bible, those who brought it to the heathen, those who were MARTYRED for the sake of the Gospel. You are wrong and you must stop commenting in favor of ESAU whom God hates. Malachi 1. Ezekiel 35 & 36. Esau crucified Messiah, do you not know that? Before you comment you must actually read the Bible.

[@dfkuz]

You are ignoring the two operating systems in the scriptures: Prophecy (Gen thru Acts) and Mystery (after prophecy FAILED), God revealed the Mystery (Eph 3:9; Col 1:25-26) and its gift gospel (Eph 2.8&9). Jesus returns during this mystery: Col 3:4; and receives HIS kingdom (not Israel’s!): Col 1:13 KJV. Prophecy was, is, will never to be resumed. All those that had faith in God and what he was accomplishing during their lifetime are translated into the kingdom of his dear Son!

[@caseycunningham]

Right on bro

[@mr.seapig2811]

How did Christian theologians miss these errors of dispensationalism over the last 200 years?

[@godisreality7014]

the errors were carefully thought out and executed by anti-Christ. Have you not read the prophets? Do you not know that scribes and teachers lie? Did you not know that Messiah was crucified by Esau whom "the church" venerates as "the chosen" of Christ?

[@gsp8489]

Presbyterians, Catholics, Lutherans, and many other histic denominations have not and still do not accepted dispensationalism. Really, dispensationalism only gained traction in American evangelical Baptist type circles.

[@zaratecharles68]

Shabbat Shalom

[@terryrobinson1416]

Did I miss the pretrib rapture? Or is that dispenationalism? Listened to it twice and didn't hear or comprehend.

[@KennethRamirez-k2y]

I am a pre-wrath dispensation list and I do believe and it says in re that God will graft back in 144,000 and the nation of Israel Ezekiel 37 talks about them being grafted back in to the body of Christ

[@jackslapp9073]

Show me a dictionary where the word 'fulfill,' means to fix, correct, fill up, or preach all of something? There isn't one that gives such a nonsense definition of the word. The speaker in the video is ignoring the fact that a word can have more than one meaning and is substituting the word 'abolish' for fulfill as if they are synonymous, which they are not. He is also incapable of discerning the difference between 'abolish,' and 'fulfill,' by claiming that they mean the same thing because the result is the same, the end of the law. But, that is an error because to abolish something is not the same thing as fulfilling something. On the contrary, they are the opposite, even if they result in a similar absence of the thing. When something is abolished it is removed, erased, banned, or done away with because it wasn't working, or was a bad thing. A law can be abolished, like the abolition of slavey, because it is immoral. But, when something is fulfilled, it is completed, satisfied, finished. Thus, Jesus is saying that he did not come to abolish the law, but to fulfill (complete, satisfy, finish) the law. 'Fulfill,' is not synonymous with the word 'abolish,' even if the final result of both is the absence of the law. 'Fulfill' and 'abolish' have two very different meanings. There are three definitions given in a dictionary, 1. to convert into actuality: effect. 2. To carry out (e.g. an order. 3. To satisfy (e.g. requirements). Jesus fulfilled the law because his sacrifice on the cross satisfied the requirements of the law. He carried out his mission; Accomplished the task; of fulfilling the requirements of the law. If he had abolished the law he would not have needed to satisfy the requirements of the law. A similar concept is used in creditor/debtor law. There are two basic ways to handle a debt, 1. Pay the debt and satisfy the contract or covenant. 2. File bankruptcy and have the debt abolished. Jesus paid the debt for us. If Jesus didn't satisfy the requirements of the law, then no one is saved. New Testament writers clearly teach that the Mosaic Covenant was fulfilled in Jesus Christ. He was the "end of the law." Rom. 10:4; 1 Cor. 3:13-16; Rom. 7:1-4; Hebrews 8:6-13. You can not claim that the old covenant is still in effect and that the new covenant is the same as the old covenant without contradicting yourself. There are universal moral laws, but those moral laws do not provide salvation. Jesus does. The death of Jesus on the cross did away with animal sacrifices, and his incarnation did away with the temple. Yet, the speaker in this video is judaizing despite the fact that there is no requirement to be circumcised and become a Jew to be a Christian. And, yes, God does say that he will turn to other people, another nation, because genetic Israel was in rebellion and apostasy. Deut. 28:63-68; 29:24-28; 31:16-18. Isaiah 65:1, "I am sought of them that asked not for me; I am found of them that sought me not, unto a nation that was not called by my name. ... (11) But ye are they that forsake the Lord, that forget my holy mountain, that prepare a table for thst troop, and that furnish the drink offering unto that number. (13) Therefore I will number you to the sword, and ye shall all bow down to slaughter: because when I called, ye did not answer; when I spake, ye did not hear; but did evil before mine eyes, and did choose that wherein I delighted not. ... (15) And ye shall leave your name for a curse unto my chosen: for the Lord God shall slay thee, and call his servants by another name." 1 Peter 2:9-10, "But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvelous light: Which in time past were not a people, but are now the people of God: which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy." Peter certainly wasn't talking to Jews here, nor was he telling his audience that they had to convert to Judaism.

[@wulfclaw4921]

Give it to God. My estranged wife after 20 years and her course of self destruction with alcoholism has taken up with this false doctrine. Anyone who follows it- if you have HONESTLY researched the background and the life of Darby and believe in this- I pity you and pray you will find your way. In the name of Christ Jesus, may God pull you out of that and show you the path. Amen

[@simply2sophisticated]

Does a difference of opinion constitute heresy? Dear brother, we all must rightly divide the Word of truth judiciously. And are we not all at different stages of growth? I could say the same about you and call you a heretic if you don't agree with me. Just saying, it's all a matter of interpretation and as with all things in the Kingdom of God. We are but broken, sinful, destitute creatures without Christ.

[@godisreality7014]

@@simply2sophisticated What we believe must align with reality. And dispensatanalism is anti-Christ, accommodating Esau who slaughtered the Lord of Glory. And magically changed the children of Israel into "the church" which is also satanic.

[@DebraFrieden-pn6ci]

Amen. Dispensationalism is not scriptural. Scofield followed Darby. Pre rature is unscriptural. The saints, church, body, bride, jew, gentile, sla, free, male, female if born again, are one in yeshua. Or Greek...thank you for your post. Many are misled today. Marantha.

[@hellooutthere8956]

So the way I was taught is wrg? I must relearn everything? Any help will be appreciated.

[@jacumbahighlander]

You missed the timing of when Ezekiel said that a new heart would be given. It is at the end of time. Read 35 before 36.

[@SpotterVideo]

Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ? (Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30) The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations? 1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Paul’s interpretation in Galatians 3:8, 3:16.) 2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ? 3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds? 4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh? 5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers? 6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"? 7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost? 8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.) 9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? 10. Watch the KZbin video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church. Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology. Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church: “The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.” Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107. Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.” Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323. John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated… "...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.” John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.) What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16? (See what Joshua said about the Old Covenant land promise in Josh. 21:43.) Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth? Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups? Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and is it fulfilled by the blood of Christ at Calvary in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 12:18-24? Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church, if the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20? (See also 2 Thess. 1:7-10) If the New Covenant has made the Old Covenant “obsolete” in Hebrews 8:6-13, why would God go back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period? Read the recent book "The Rise and Fall of Dispensationalism", by Daniel G. Hummel.

[@godisreality7014]

"jews" are Esau. The disciples of Messiah were Israelites that He gathered. Isaiah 60, Ezekiel 37, Ezekiel 11.17, Jeremiah 31, Isaiah 11.11. Anti-Christ is not "the chosen" people of Messiah, but of satan. John 8.44

[@prophet6154]

It's with a very broad brush... The era of Christianity, just like judaism, just like religion, just like new age, the world's gospel is not the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth. Seek God, while you can still find him... This day and age, thats a loaded statement. People so offended by truth. Yours, mines, somebodies else's....

[@MrKook]

Red flag #1: the first 5 dispensations all occur in the first book of the Scriptures. That should set off alarm bells to anyone with sense.

[@truthmonger7]

The Promise didn't come until the 4th dispensation. That's why Abraham has the prominence within Genesis. For more on this topic, No King But Caesar & The Return Of The Melchisedec is available online at Advantage Books. Peace to all.

[@bawbnottheowldbawb7558]

Red flag... The word "dispensation" does not appear anywhere in the Book of Genesis... Yet some random person tries to claim there are five of them in that Book...

[@robwagnon6578]

I believe that Jesus claimed to be I am...

[@Watchmanonthewall77]

You have to completely ignore whole passages of Pauls writing to believe this. I don't believe the church replaced Israel but Paul literally fought the church in Jerusalem over making Gentile's coming into the faith practice the law. Jesus fulfilled the law when he died on the Cross. The law points exclusively to Christ. If you are in Christ you are free from the law. Read Romans chpt's 6, 7 and 8. Paul goes through great lengths to show the relationship of the law to the sinner and ungodly vs the relationship of the believers born into Christ Jesus, being free from the law. I would like to dialogue with someone from this channel through email or another means rather than through this post Im being sincere. My heart breaks over this because i feel you are unintentionally misleading people out of a right relationship with Jesus Christ and his atoning blood and back to depending on the law for salvation. Am i misunderstanding this? Please tell me i am.

[@godisreality7014]

Paul is not helpful in regard to Israel. He says he is of Benjamin, which would make him and Israelite of the uncircumcision (Eph 2.11). So why does he call himself a pharisee and circumcised? There probably was a real Paul that was added unto by anti-Christ scribes of Esau and satan.

[@chuckgunn1359]

"For the Lord God does nothing without revealing his secret to His servants and prophets". Doesn't that conflict with Paul's message that he was told certain "mysteries" that could not be searched from the old scriptures?

[@bawbnottheowldbawb7558]

"Paul's message that he was told certain "mysteries" that could not be searched from the old scriptures" That conflicts with the fact Yeshua said he revealed EVERYTHING to the Apostles... John 16:15 - Everything that belongs to the Father is Mine. That is why I said that the Spirit will take from what is Mine and disclose it to you. (KJV) - All things that the Father hath are mine: therefore said I, that he shall take of mine, and shall shew it unto you.

[@chuckgunn1359]

@@bawbnottheowldbawb7558 John 16:15 DOES NOT say "everything". Nowhere does the Bible state that the apostles learned "everything".

[@alambalamb]

So when Paul stated that he received a new dispensation it was not a new dispensation but an old dispensation? 1 Cor 2:17 "For if I do this thing willingly, I have a reward: but if against my will, a dispensation of the gospel is committed unto me." Also not all dispensation is as per what you state it to be. Let me give you an example. Being a dispensationalism I believe we need the law as it shows us what sin is. The difference is that we are no longer under the law but under grace. We are now a new creature spiritually. We now have every blessing spiritually but awaiting our day to inherit our spiritual bodies. This teaching to me seems incorrect as it's failing a number of tests. This is the error the Ephesians made by going back to the law. The Corinthians were on the other extreme where they said let's continue in sin as grace covers everything. If you read both books you find two points of error in the application of grace. It seems like this teaching is promoting faith plus works like Catholicism.

[@SusansRoadLessTraveled]

The scripture you mean to reference is 1 Cor 9:17. The original Greek translated as dispensation is “οἰκονομίαν” which means stewardship or management. That to me says to “guard” “mind” or “care for something.” ESV “For if I do this of my own will, I have a reward, but if not of my own will, I am still entrusted with a stewardship.” If you love Me, keep (guard, steward) My Commandments.” 1 John 14:15 Shabbat Shalom!

[@nathanieldiaz2845]

So I'm curious what is your response to the original greek word in question? Genuine question as I wanted to ask the same thing. On a different note you said we need the law to know what sin is? So then you agree that we shouldn't live in sin, I assume, therefore we don't go agianst things the Torah says not to do, correct? Not talking Justification. Our works or lack thereof don't gain us salvation. But as I'm sure you agree with a "saved" person who pastors a church and lives in an openly gay marriage isn't justified, as all they are doing is abusing the blood of Messiah. So long as they continue to live like that. They aren't really saved, correct? If it shows us what sin is then we for all intents and purposes still follows ot or Should follow it has its how God teaches us right from wrong.

[@alambalamb]

@@nathanieldiaz2845 I use the KJV that has it as dispensation. However, let's say its stewardship instead of dispensation. It still does not change the message that Paul is communicating. You can apply the same to Col 1:25-26 as well. “Whereof I am made a minister, according to the dispensation of God which is given to me for you, to fulfil the word of God; Even the mystery which hath been hid from ages and from generations, but now is made manifest to his saints:”. If you want, replace dispensation with stewardship. The fact is that he was entrusted with something new from Christ Jesus. We see this in Rom 16:25 “Now to him that is of power to stablish you according to my gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began,” Col 1:26 “Even the mystery which hath been hid from ages and from generations, but now is made manifest to his saints:” Further Paul refers to the gospel as my gospel. Not that it is his, but it was given to him from Christ Jesus. We see this in Gal 1:12 “For I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it, but I received it through a revelation of Jesus Christ.” The apostles did not know this and found it difficult to understand it but by the Holy Spirit were able to accept it. Paul himself says that the apostles did not add anything to him but rather he thought the apostles something. Gal 2:6 “But of these who seemed to be somewhat, (whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me: God accepteth no man's person:) for they who seemed to be somewhat in conference added nothing to me:” Therefore, if you want, replace the word ‘dispensation’ with whatever word you want but it does not change the underlying message in that something new was revealed to Paul that was not known before. Otherwise Paul is a liar, and all his letters should be removed from the Bible. His task was to reveal the fellowship of the mystery. Eph 3:9 “And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ:” The reason there is so much confusion is that there is a lack of rightly dividing the word. Many people look at dispensationalists and incorrectly assume that they ignore scripture and only take what they believe to be what applies to them. This is incorrect. We take the whole Bible but what I believe is that what while the whole Bible was written for us not everything is written to us. An example is circumcision. This was for the Israelites and not for us gentiles. Another example would be for the teachings of Jesus when he said it is written but I say unto you examples. Mat 5:38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ 39 But I say to you, Do not resist an evildoer. But if anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn the other also; 40 and if anyone wants to sue you and take your coat, give your cloak as well; A division of time needs to be applied as what was said before, is now overwritten by that was stated by Christ after he came to earth. The same can be said about the law. We are under grace but if we did not know the law we would not know what sin is. Therefore we need to know the law. Paul put it this way. Rom 7:7 “What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.” This scripture teaches that once we accept Christ we are baptised into his death and are now a new creature. That is a new being spiritually and have every blessing spiritually. Further to that we are sealed with the Holy Spirit as a promise of the hope of Glory we will receive. Paul himself said to die is gain for him as he knew of the glory that awaits him in Christ. Unfortunately we are still in our flesh while on earth. So its like a roles royce engine in an old mini cooper. We will be prone to sin in the flesh but we can overcome sin as what is in us is greater than what is in the world. I believe a saved person cannot lose their salvation but if I see a so called saved person still indulging in sin then I question is that person is truly saved but I am not the ultimate judge who can determine that. All I know is that if we are under grace and for those of us who are truely saved are saved not by our deeds of keeping the law but by what Christ has done for us. Paul states this to the Corinthians and corrects their error through the letter to them but still refers to them as saints in Christ at the beginging of his letter. He knew that sin was a behavioural problem and wrote the letter to make them aware of their error so that they will stop doing it. I do watch this channel, but I have to say that some of the teachings are somewhat erroneous as there is a clear lack of rightly dividing the Word of God. 2 Tim 2:15 “Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.” I checked the ESV that replaces word ‘dividing’ with ‘handling’. Then let's rightly handle the Word so you understand scripture clearly. Shalom.

[@alambalamb]

@@SusansRoadLessTraveled I think I respofef to you and nathan in the one message below.

[@erinklein3598]

By calling this covenant “new,” he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and outdated will soon disappear. (Hebrews 8:13). The “one law” has been made obsolete, so you could say there are two laws.

[@truthmonger7]

For more on this topic, No King But Caesar & The Return Of The Melchisedec is available online at Advantage Books. Peace to all.

[@godisreality7014]

The 10 commandments are the laws of God, who IS the Law, which never changes.

[@truthmonger7]

@@godisreality7014 The New Covenant says that all laws hang on these two laws. Love God first, love your neighbor second. But, neither of these two laws appear in the Ten Commandments. Only nine of the Ten Commandments appear in the New Covenant and Apostle Paul says that the Law of Christ is different than the Law of Moses. God loves zeal but its not always the best teacher. Read the New Testament a few times, the Law of Christ is explained fully throughout. For more on this topic, No King But Caesar & The Return Of The Melchisedec is available online at Advantage Books. Peace to all.

[@Mirro.555]

Both in Old and New Testament the Scripture mentions about the remnant of Israel. The remnant of faithful, not any extra super-meritedness is mentioned.

[@godisreality7014]

the remnant of both Israel and Judah will be gathered AGAIN at the end of time (Isaiah 11.11). They were already gathered when He came, just before His crucifixion in John 12.20-24.

[@bethelshiloh]

Yehovah

[@bawbnottheowldbawb7558]

When you know, you know... Once you learn that Yahweh came from "Yowehpiter"...

[@0Noobslayer0]

Acts 13:47-48, Acts 15:7-9 Acts 21:25, Acts 28:28... Etc. Gentiles were saved all over the place in acts.

[@chuckgunn1359]

What is the point you are making with this comment?

[@edbiernot4852]

Our family was shunned though of course never admitted that dispensationalism was the only way to grasp eschatology . Because God the Almighty raised me up through His Spirit to believe what has been believed from the beginning of this better covenant Blessings be-lov-ed

[@khristalalpensepai9439]

Should Christian observe 7th day Sabbath? Hoe you rejected pre tribulational Rapture?

[@MrKook]

Didn't you post this one a few weeks ago?

[@johnirish989]

The Concordant Literal New Testament doesn't say Israel has a terrestrial earthbound destination and the body of Christ has a spiritual one. It says the body has a CELESTIAL destination, the exact opposite of a terrestrial destination. Paul writes to both groups: members of the body of Christ, and members of the bride of the Lambkin. Hebrews, written by Paul (he ends all his epistles with the same ending) is a clear example of the latter.

[@bawbnottheowldbawb7558]

"Concordant Literal New Testament " So? Numerous versions of the Bible don't reveal the Name of YeHoVaH either... That is one of them...

[@amandadewet4022]

Born again people whether Jew or Gentile are the body of Christ. Israel God's chosen people rejected Him so they are not part of Christ's body. On what basis? God is still going to deal with His Choosen people Israel He has not forsaken them even though they have forsaken Him. Ultimately He would like them to receive salvation which only comes from being born again for Jews and Gentiles

[@simply2sophisticated]

No one responded. I couldn't agree more. Very simplistic statement. Thank you

[@godisreality7014]

"jew" means Esau, "gentile" means Jacob-Israel and the birthright was stolen 76 years ago. It will not be long until Wrath comes down from the Holy One of Israel.

[@godisreality7014]

@@simply2sophisticated I responded. Esau is not Jacob-Israel, though he would like to be and he has fooled almost he entire world that he is but he isn´t.

[@CJS326]

I dont know much about dispensationalism but i do know we had the old covenant/law and then jesus died and gave us a new covenant. I believe the entire bible however the old covenant doesnt apply anymore thats why we have a new testament. I mean you start off the video talking about believing the entire bible. Are you doing animal sacrifices? No obviously not because we are under the new covenant. We know jesus is returning soon and then we have the 1000 year reign of jesus.

[@godisreality7014]

the old and the new are a gnostic trick to invert reality. God is the great IAM and He never changes. Messiah was constantly at odds with the pharisaical Edomites of Esau who wanted to kill Him even before He was born (Herod). Why? They are anti-Christ and the chosen of their father the devil. John 8.44

[@zachary7656]

Matthew 27:50 Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the ghost. 51 And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent; 52 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, 53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many. 54 Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying, Truly this was the Son of God. Sounds to me like this cover all the way to the devils release for his 1000 year sentence, which happened around 1030 ad and now IF the millennial day theory carriers any weight the Lord day is less then a decade away! Armageddon and out. it is easy to see the isreal traditionalists will want to live the law through Christ and that gentiles will want to live their morality through Christ but both were called to put down the former self to live through Christ and for His cause which will be according to the word of God but love of law and love of morality will taint the relationship with Jesus Christ. Christ is the tree of life and only Jews and gentiles which in older times was to believe in he who was to come; now is He who has come; those were always the only who had access to the tree of life. we gentiles weren't called to Jewish tradition nor Jew to tradition of morality rather both to Christ!

[@godisreality7014]

"gentiles" means: the children of Jacob-Israel? Esau is not Israel.

[@zachary7656]

@@godisreality7014 anyone not jew

[@dfkuz]

Dispensationalism IS warranted by the FACT that no pagan Gentiles were allowed to be saved during Acts. How can something said to other people but denying us pagans entry into the churches apply to us?

[@bawbnottheowldbawb7558]

Can you read the following verses? They answer your question... Leviticus 19:34, Exodus 12:49, Leviticus 24:22, Numbers 9:14, Numbers 15:14, Numbers 15:15, Numbers 15:16, Numbers 15:29, Deuteronomy 1:16, Deuteronomy 24:14, Leviticus 18:26, Exodus 12:19, Exodus 20:10, Deuteronomy 5:14, Leviticus 16:29, Leviticus 17:8, Leviticus 17:10, Leviticus 22:18, Leviticus 17:13, Leviticus 24:16, Numbers 15:26, Numbers 35:15, Joshua 20:9, Numbers 19:10, Romans 2:14 "Dispensationalism IS warranted by the FACT that no pagan Gentiles were allowed to be saved during Acts." No facts were contained in this statement... The verses I provided for you explain... Please read them... "Gentiles" were denied access to the Temple because of Judaism, NOT the Laws of GOD... Yeshua preached AGAINST Judaism... He CONSTANTLY rebuked them for not following Moses (the Laws of GOD) and their "traditions"... Ruth was a "Gentile/pagan/foreigner or what ever you want to call her... And she was in the line of Judah, eventually Yeshua... Also, the woman at the well who was a Pagan was the first person Yeshua revealed that He was Messiah to... I pray these words have been heard by you...

[@dfkuz]

@@bawbnottheowldbawb7558 I appreciate you taking the time to compose this response. I did say that pagan Gentiles were not allowed to be saved during the Acts period, right? I do realize that Gentiles that were closely associated with the chosen people or converts to Judaism during the Old Testament economy were eligible to receive a place in the prophesied kingdom (if it had come, but it did not). During Acts, the only Gentiles saved were those obeying the Jews' ordinances; no Gentiles eating pork with unwashed hands and sleeping with their neighbors' wives were allowed to be saved or to enter the Jewish synagogues where Paul held his congregations. The woman at the well was not a pagan as she herself pointed out, that she worshiped the same God as the Jews, with whom the Samaritans were related. I find it interesting that Jesus told a "scarlet" woman like the Samaritan woman that he was the Messiah, but never said a word about it to the Gentile woman (perhaps of higher morals than the Samaritan) in Matthew 15 even though he reluctantly helped her daughter but only when she admitted to being a dog (which is what the Jews considered pagan Gentiles to be -just as many Jews still do today according to their Talmud). God was just as adverse in the Old Testament to the chosen people intermingling/marrying with the pagans surrounding them. He had a vested interest in keeping the genetic line of his chosen nation pure as it was to be the vehicle through which he would introduce his Son into this world in order to redeem the nation that needed to be born again of the spirit in Jesus Christ. It was only when the chosen nation of Judah (as Israel had already been divorced by God: Jeremiah 3:8 KJV) rejected the Bridegroom/Messiah?King by exercising the free will they like all humans had been created with, that God, instead of giving up on the human race, introduced the secret, the mystery, he had hid in himself (and not in the scriptures); and he basically began to consider every unsaved human after Acts ended to be a pagan Gentile even if they were Jewish (Colossians 3:11), and he revealed his offer of eternal life to those pagans (including you and me today) via the free gift of Ephesians 2:8 & 9, according to the revelation of the mystery (Eph 3:9; Col 1:25-26 KJV) but as an offer to individuals - not nations or groups or churches. And that paradigm has continued to this day and will continue until Christ returns (appears) back on earth (Colossians 3:4) during this dispensation of the mystery - NOT in any return to prophecy. All of the prophecy and promises of the Old Testament not fulfilled by the birth and earthly life/death of the Messiah, Jesus of Nazareth, were canceled by the divorce that God gave to the nation of Judah as a whole (but not to individuals of faith in that Messiah who would assuredly receive the reward of an eternal home in the kingdom of Colossians 1:13 - the same kingdom we will dwell in when he appears with us in glory. All unfulfilled prophecy has been canceled, as in, PERMANENTLY!

[@dfkuz]

What is said in Acts applies only to the Acts period!

[@keithtauber4153]

I want to correct you on the Rom 11 verse. Israel is NOT the olive tree brother. Jesus is. He said he is the vine and we are the branches elsewhere. it is the same concept. Jesus is the trunk and roots of the tree and we are the branches. We need Jesus in order to live just as branches need the vine or the trunk of a tree to live. We were lost (therefore wild) and needed to be grafted into Jesus to be saved. National Israel were also branches that eventually were cut off due to their unbelief. If the entire tree were Israel, how would God cut them off? Makes no sense. So Israel has to be branches that can be removed from unbelief and then new ones (Gentiles) grafted in because of their faith in Jesus. Some of the physical Jews were not cut off because they were born again by believing on Jesus. Most Jews at that time were not believers and were cut off. This is what Paul is teaching. God bless.

[@MB-263]

Why are you using tetragram names?

[@G-T]

The house of Jacob/Israel no longer exists it was completely & utterly destroyed in 70AD.

[@EmilDelosSantos-h9p]

The way you prove that God will reestablish the house of israel shows that israel is really separate and not the church. You simply demonstrate that God has a covenant with israel that He will fulfill and it is clear that it has nothing to do with the church.

[@dusttalking6871]

Dispensationalism is an unbiblical approach to biblical hermeneutics. Supercessionism was believed by all expositors until Darby came along in the 19th c., who taught “Israel” and the “church” constituted two distinct peoples of the Lord.

[@ipaint00]

So if my diet...my non-observance of His appointed times and my disregard for His commandments. . .how can I be saved?

[@uwekonnigsstaddt524]

Messiah Yeshua fulfilled all Laws, never breaking one. Yeshua is YHWH in human flesh. Only a Holy God can fulfill His own PERFECT Law. You and I are sinful; thus, Holy Law cannot be done by sinful men. Yeshua fulfilled the Law in our Behalf. Died to our sins in our behalf, and defeated death, vindicated by His Resurrection from the dead. You are forgiven and saved from your sins by putting your faith and trust in what Messiah Yeshua has accomplished. Habakkuk 2:4, The Just shall live by faith, not works

[@wydopnthrtl]

If a woman married you but didn't listen to your requests and ignored them.... how would you feel about her? WHat if she said her old boyfriend didn't beleive in that stuff so she's going to continue to do things they way they used to before being married to you? So how does Yahweh and Yeshua feel about someone who ignores their principals? And wants to observe their previous ways that you find detestable?

[@DTH1661]

@@uwekonnigsstaddt524 Shalom and blessings. The Most High YHWH did not give mankind the Torah (Instructions not Law) as a burden of which they could not keep. The Torah is everlasting, perfect and true. Yeshua did not change that. He fulfilled the Torah to show how to keep Torah to its fullness as a witness to His disciples, not so you do not have to keep it!!! By your reckoning because Yeshua fulfilled the Torah it is now fine for you to lie, steal, murder, commit adultery, create graven images, dishonour your parents, covet, take YHWH's name in vain, forget the Sabbath, and choose any 'god' that takes your fancy!!! Really? We are saved by grace through faith, which, through love of our Messiah will lead us to obedience, walking as He walked and all His disciples walked and all the early believers walked. Keeping Torah.... Not for salvation, but out of love. 'If you love me keep my commandments', 'For this is the love of YHWH, that we keep His commandments', 'Teaching them to observe all things I have commanded you'. May I lovingly suggest you study your Bible more thoroughly to show yourself approved. Sabbath blessings.

[@ellenlefavour628]

@@DTH1661Amen - true and well said. Shabbat shalom.

[@DTH1661]

@@ellenlefavour628 Shabbat Shalom, Ellen.Thank you Sister. Sabbath blessings.

[@bethelshiloh]

Stephen did not use the word “church” in Acts 7. KJV interpreters interpreted it that way (although I believe Israel is what we as believers in Yeshua are grafted in). Just saying.

[@godisreality7014]

"church" is not of Messiah, it is anti-Christ.

[@Sarah-mr3wd]

I completely agree with you. What a wonderful examination and explanation! Dispensationalism might have been created by one of the devils fallen onto the earth in Revelation 12. 😅😅

[@godisreality7014]

It was.

[@amandadewet4022]

When you are born again you are a new creation born from above one with God. 2nd Corinthians 5 17 17 Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new. 17 Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come.

[@amandadewet4022]

We born again believers cannot be the same as Israel at all. We are born of God, his offspring and his children. We are not in covenant with Him. We are children of the promise not under law. The law always persecuted the child of promise. See Galations. Following a very different doctrine to the word.

[@the.remnant__]

I'm happily in covenant with my King.

[@Tracy-Inches]

@@amandadewet4022everyone here I am sure has read Galatians, to understand what Paul wrote you must understand what he understood. I suggest becoming familiar with the beginning of YHWH’s word before thinking you understand what Paul wrote in his epistle to Galatia. Yah bless

[@truthmonger7]

@@amandadewet4022 You have a nice perspective. For more on this topic, No King But Caesar & The Return Of The Melchisedec is available online at Advantage Books. Peace to all.

[@hubertlancaster]

Dispensationalism is a worldly error. The Kingdom of Jesus Christ was a spiritual kingdom which started when the Holy Ghost was given in Acts 2. The first resurrection has already past with 144,000 Jews. The millennial reign of Christ started when the Kingdom started and ended when the devil was loosed 1000yrs later with the appearance of the Catholic Antichrist Church. The angel that came down from heaven with a great chain was Christ Jesus (the messenger of the new covenant). The only tribulation we will experience is the same one that has been from the beginning, there is no greater tribulation than that a man is burned alive by the Catholic church. The last Resurrection and the Judgment is at the coming of Jesus Christ, of a number that no man can number of all nations and tongues (Revelation chapter 7). The end of this present age is immanent. The devil was loosed to go out and deceive the nations and bring them to war, as we can see with the situation in the world today he has done an exceptional job.

[@audiodrink]

Incorrect

[@hubertlancaster]

@@audiodrink The covenants changed, according to Paul, the true Jew is made up of the Church who are filled with the Holy Ghost. Under the New Covenant the Jew is the Spiritual decendents of Jesus Christ. by being a partaker of His Spirit.

[@hubertlancaster]

@@audiodrink it's not wrong, it just does not agree with your assumptions.

[@xanderbarr1983]

Any thoughts on the state of israel? What is written?

[@godisreality7014]

that Esau stole the land and the identity of Jacob-Israel during the captivities. Obadaiah, Ezekiel 35 & 36. Messiah was crucified by Esau who is dwelling in the tents of Shem.

[@joshuacalvert4917]

Yeah it's not of land, it's of spirit

[@godisreality7014]

@@joshuacalvert4917 The physical seed of Abraham is alive and well. The physical seed of Jacob-Israel were the disciples of Messiah.

[@radarnine]

Many will fall away; it is written. Don't be deceived by men. Don't let your heart be troubled. He who HEARS My teachings and do them and teach them shall be seen as Great in the Kingdom: paraphrased)...Why we pray daily; Let Your Will be done...after "They Kingdom Come.." Now!!! We can Do It with Him only, Amen

[@oscaldez]

28 It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us not to impose any burden on you apart from the following requirements: Acts 15:28 [NIV] Looks like you forgot to quote the rest of this Scripture. Besides is not clear what the church is for you. Seems like you want to have a church called Israel without actually having Israel in it

[@Rekora_Wulf]

This proves you need to go back and retest everything you just said. You say that fullfill means, put an end to it? Are you serious? How about complete? You won't say that because it fits if you do that. Dispensationalism is not false. You absolutely have to agree that Dispensationalism exists. Its a biblical word after all. There are just many people who claim to be Dispensationalists that are just doing it incorrectly. There is undeniable proof that Dispensationalism is a thing. The debate is just how it is implemented.

[@Auliyah_not_urs]

It seems his understanding of scripture is good until he starts ignoring so much of what Jesus and the Apostles, especially Paul, say about HOW we fulfill God’s commandments by walking in the Spirit and not after the flesh. Those things in the law which Paul says are a SHADOW of the reality we have in Christ are fulfilled in Christ and the symbolic shadows of such no longer need to be practiced. Paul has so much to say to the early new covenant church about these things, rebuking them for thinking and teaching that they are still under them, I can hardly believe anyone with halfway decent reading comprehension could get this wrong. But again, this is a beautiful and quite thorough refutation of dispensational nonsense.

[@BlindlyFollowEvery1]

So close yet so far

[@Nameless-w2t]

😂❤

[@amandadewet4022]

Who were the branches broken off because of unbelief ?ROMANS 11.17 And if some of the branches be broken off, and thou, being a wild olive tree, wert grafted in among them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the olive tree; 18 Boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee. 19 Thou wilt say then, The branches were broken off, that I might be grafted in. 20 Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear:

[@GlennJudah]

I believe Judah.

[@godisreality7014]

@@GlennJudah Yes, Judah was cut-off. He sold Joseph into slavery, married a Canaanite woman and then his own daughter-in -law Tamar the EDOMITE. Their issue, Pharez and Zerah were also evil. Pharez means "breach" and Achan of Zerah caused Israel to sin under Joshua (7). However, a remnant of Judah will also be saved and Messiah joined Israel and Judah in John 12.20-24 (Judah = "the Greek" because he was sold to Greece after Babylonian captivity Joel 3.6)

[@johnirish989]

Just 5 minutes in and I'm already annoyed. In bible studies the first issue should be Which bibke and why? I could translate the Bible and pretty much "prove" whatever I want to prove. From the get-go objectivity is for-gone.

[@radarnine]

Does your Bible say Peter told Jesus that he would put down the Nets or Net. Maybe he thought a carpenter wouldn't be the wiser. Many translations use this to look over why Peter fell down and asked Jesus to depart; proclaiming himself a sinful man for disobeying Jesus request to let down the Nets. Words matter. Be not deceived. Have Mercy forward. God have mercy on us all. Amen

[@icezebra]

The hebrew roots movement is a peculiar heresy to me. How can one claim to follow Jesus while denying his divinity? Please people, if you want traditional christianity simply look into the orthodox church, or even catholicism would be better than this drek

[@MichaelPHays]

The Church doesn't replace Israel, the Church IS Israel. Fullfilment not replacement theology.

[@bawbnottheowldbawb7558]

"Church" originated from the word "circe", sometimes spelled "kirke"... Circe is a lesser Greek Goddess who lured men to their demise by deceiving them... Neither was there a "church" in the wilderness as the translators would have you to believe... Yeshua never intended to have a "church" the way it is now... He did not want huge amount of people ignorantly participating in idolatry and worthlessness... Claiming the very things Yeshua came to proclaim to be true...

[@bawbnottheowldbawb7558]

The only "fulfillment" in what you have stated is Jeremiah 16:19

[@Gazman67]

The called out or dedicated to the Lord.

[@amandadewet4022]

Israel was cut off and blinded because of their unbelief. They are not the Church. Hebrews 4 Let us therefore fear, lest, a promise being left us of entering into his rest, any of you should seem to come short of it. 2 For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it. 3 For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world. 4 For he spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise, And God did rest the seventh day from all his works. 5 And in this place again, If they shall enter into my rest. 6 Seeing therefore it remaineth that some must enter therein, and they to whom it was first preached entered not in because of unbelief: 7 Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so long a time; as it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts. 8 For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day. 9 There remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God. 10 For he that is entered into his rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from his. 11 Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief

[@godisreality7014]

Israel was not cut off. The Israelites were the disciples of Messiah, called Galileans. Messiah was of Ephraim, born in Bethlehem of Galilee and called a Nazarene. He is the Holy One of Israel There is always a remnant. Gathered once under Messiah (Ezekiel 11.17, Isaiah 9, Isaiah 60, Ezekiel 37, Jeremiah 31). There are those who by conspiracy want to cut Israel off from being a nation and God is going to make stubble out of them. Psalm 83 The whole counsel of God is needed and not just Paul, who in the case of Israel is not at all helpful and that is a kind understatement. Over the millennia, God has been perfecting His seed of Israel by sifting us through the nations (Amos 9.9). He promised Abraham, In Isaac shall thy seed by called. Genesis 21.12 "But fear not thou, O my servant Jacob, and be not dismayed, O Israel: for, behold, I will save thee from afar off, and thy seed from the land of their captivity; and Jacob shall return, and be in rest and at ease, and none shall make him afraid. Fear thou not, O Jacob my servant, saith the Lord: for I am with thee; for I will make a full end of all the nations whither I have driven thee: but I will not make a full end of thee, but correct thee in measure; yet will I not leave thee wholly unpunished." Jeremiah 46.27-28