15 = 3 x 5: Erik Lucero's Quantum Computing Breakthrough

An amazing video about the UC Santa Barbara Physics Department by MAT student James Darling documenting the quantum computing research done by Erik Lucero, who was a Ph.D student at UCSB at the time of this study. For more on this research, go here: www.ia.ucsb.edu/pa/display.asp...
Erik Lucero is currently part of John Martinis' group with UC Santa Barbara & Google. The group recently announced quantum supremacy with their Sycamore computer. Using 53 entangled quantum bits (“qubits”), the Sycamore computer has taken on - and solved - a problem considered intractable for classical computers.

[@alexrosales5832]

Can this run crysis 3 at max settings or will I have to go to low?

[@ewowoi]

+Alex Rosales it will quickly make a sustaining AI that will finish your crisis instantly

[@boiledfrog5739]

it will pop up errors

[@loola456]

it can 48% of the time

[@joeyjack0101]

Simply amazing, Quantum computing in its infancy. We are witnessing a historical breakthrough.

[@Silverheartsmusic]

Erik & crew - think about ESD protection when you handle the silicon. static clothes > movement > kV's charge > fries or weakens the silicon. You're carefully carrying the processor - but you're generating a charge - it's looking for the easiest discharge path. Been there done that. ~Bob, EE

[@juanpedraw4245]

We're on our way, I say. Remember, the first models of our Computer was just like this. One computer required one room, it was only able to compute numbers and nothing else, it has a separate room for the CPU, it's loud, it takes more than one person to make a computer work before. People thought it was impossible to finish. But not anymore. With quantum computers, we are doing the same thing again, but more ambitious.

[@juice12222]

Apple will sell it for 1.3 million with only 4gb memory and integrated graphics as the base standard.

[@juice12222]

***** lol, they will sue them for no reason.

[@CariagaXIII]

+Hugo Perea you are thinking small millions why not billions.

[@bws205]

bashing Apple, how original

[@warrenbrandt2572]

Hugo Perea and still no USB

[@1SunScope]

Apple deserves the shit bashed of them. Is that original enough?

[@isodoublet]

Yes you can, because checking if a factorization is correct is straightforward: you just have to multiply the numbers together. If you get the wrong result, run the algorithm again. The probability that you'll never get the right answer is about (1/2)^n, which gets very small very quick.

[@monicaxireland]

This is such a complex subject and this is what is being made public about what is being discovered. It makes me wonder at times are even more amazing breakthroughs being made that we are unaware of. The problem of course is that some of these teams are being doomed to going down blind alleyways that will never work without realizing they have been visited before. Has anyone created a list of the different kinds of Quantum research techniques that is currently going on. (i.e like Seth Lloyd's work at MIT or the different approach Dwave are using) to try and define clearly methodologies and outcomes?.

[@sephwizzard]

I am loving the comments on this, love science and fun !

[@AlexanderMoen]

But HOW did this happen? If you're able to do a basic computation like this, haven't you solved the decoherence problem to some extent (although not perfectly, since it was 48% of the time versus 50)?

[@cubanopipi]

Estoy mas ancioso que ellos de ver que esto se convierta en una tecnologia, no solo efectiva y rapida sino que pueda llegar a todos... tal vez mi generacion solo lo vea implementado en universidades, pero algun dia sera, suerte. Im ansious about this tecnology, hopefully one day will turn to be as poppular as today computting. good luck.

[@darcytakhar]

amazing man I value your hard work and passion to making a humanity dream come true. Don't worry about security for now next generation will find ways to make it secure but what we need is to progress as humans is our dependency on the technology. We wont survive as specie if we don't seek for solution to our problem. This planet one day soon well be gone, we have to make sure our survival within any cost. You are a true hero.

[@SwagDawg]

I can't imagine the feeling of that guy when everyone started clapping... as if all of his unsure work was finally validated.

[@EralpBayraktar]

Well let me explain it to you, 15 = 3x5 is integer factorization and those kinds of problems are 'easy-to-check', meaning if you are given a solution you can easily check whether they are correct or not. Keep this in mind. If I told you 987=3*7*47, you can immediately multiply 3 numbers and check whether I was right or wrong. 'Immediately' is compared to the time you would spend if I asked you the question "What is the integer factorization of 987?" Do you see how hard is it? So coming to the problem this quantum computer gives us the right solution 48% of the time, wow this is fantastic! I would be glad if I could get the right solution 0.001% of the time! Do you see why? Because I could feed the output of the quantum computer to a classical computer and let it check if the solution was correct. How long would it take? 1 ms? Well I certainly could run the quantum algorithm 1000 times, and check the output 1000 times, only 1 second overhead with these numbers. (Of course you would stop if you got the right solution inbetween 0-1000) The good thing is that integer factorization problem is easy-to-check as I just said. Consider TSP problem, given a path, can you easily check if it is the solution? Nah, you can't, as much as I know.

[@bradleydayment7449]

Eralp Bayraktar what happens when there are multiple answers?

[@296684064]

There isn't .... all numbers used in the multiplication are prime numbers...

[@loola456]

What happens 52% of the times?

[@americancitizen748]

So the original problem of factoring the huge number would only take 1/2 the age of the universe instead of the entire age of the universe? Still not practical!

[@suesheification]

Eralp Bayraktar is this related to p vs np

[@ccsmooth55]

Im assuming that the times it produces a different answer that thats due to the qbits not behaving as they should? Meaning that eventhough theyve supercooled and evacuated the chamber that some outside influences are still affecting the subatomic particles?

[@2001daf]

Where can I find the music? I've looked around for it and can't find it.

[@Synochra]

I feel so incredibly stupid trying to follow this. So instead I'll focus on that guy's pants in 3:41 . What up with those?

[@KevinP32270]

HAAAAAA

[@hunterbiden7391]

Synochra damn. I was gonna say something about those.

[@Synochra]

I mean, you can really tell he is a dedicated, hard working, intelligent guy who's doing more towards improving mankind than most of us combined ever will, but goddamn, he shouldn't allow his mom to do his shopping mang. They look so terrible, he should feel bad for not feeling bad about the way those pants look

[@vlad-pm2zr]

A quick update from 2017, we are at 2000 qubits with D-Wave's 2000Q :D

[@brucemckinlay9739]

Nice Whalers crest on that guys shirt near the end!

[@Andiotic]

I still think Quantum computing still has a LONG way to go. It's more likely that Nano or molecular Computers will precede current generation of computers.

[@ivanereiz1533]

Andiotic molecular pc will come before quantum

[@92brunod]

Do YOU think that or did you just hear Michio Kaku say that and you're just repeating it?

[@Shiannas94]

hahaha

[@artistAlexS]

can we visit the google quantum computer in santa barbara ?

[@PanGrothaus]

When something is completely understood it can be explained in the simplest terms. I will continue to do research. Because I don't understand what it is for. It seems to be a really fast calculator. What is their projected goal?

[@ILik3PH0T0]

+littlegodpan1 There really isn't a known, absolute, solution to the use of a quantum computer. Were still really trying to ask those questions but the purpose of this particular one is to compute two prime numbers whose multiple is the given variable. Some things are explained easily but in complex terms. This video was very descriptive and pretty much explains exactly what their particular goal is.

[@aku7598]

Is there time frame? Will there be possibility of total waste of time and energy?

[@fcycles]

I am guessing that qbits are use in super-impose states to compute all possibilities at once... but to get the answer out of the super-impose states do you need an operation which will make the answer you are looking for come-out? Can someone give an example?

[@Mamumimi77]

+fcycles In order receive any output with significant meaning, you need a process and an input. They sortakinda explained the process, but didn't explain the inputs. Knowing how basic this kind of stuff is, I assume it was hard-coded; exactly like making a calculator that only had an on button and only performed one operation. The trick is reading the calculator, I guess.

[@ninjamaster224]

this might be a stupid question, but does the success rate go down when the input number is larger?

[@FabiWann]

48% of the time

[@americancitizen748]

Pocket size version any day now?

[@salzee]

Fascinating.

[@ralphwalters906]

15=3(5) 48% of the runtime. The more interesting question is what was 3(5) 52% of the runtime?

[@dependent-wafer-177]

I think they should add the vitron 5000 to the colex capacitor to achieve a high velocity radrant so that the regenitive retrospective invulator will transistally reconsultrate the flux hydron so fusion may be finally possible.

[@americancitizen748]

Not "invulator" - "INCULATOR"! Amateur.

[@PlanXV]

the qubit can be represented as a 0 or 1 or a superposition of (10). the best analogy is if you imagine a red door as a 0 or closed and a green door as 1 or open ..in classical computation these are the only doors available to use. in the quantum computer there is also a yellow door the superposition. let's imagine a maze of rooms with three doors. in order to make the best progress through the maze all the doors must lead to a solution ... however in the classical computer the doors can only be opened one at a time I.e red door blue door blue door red door. in quantum computer a yellow door is available as a tool to check both doors at once... so you have a headstart as each door is open the rate at which you progress thru the maze is n to the power of 2. this exponential trait is what sets quantum computers apart from classical dual bit computers as the function of the superposition ( yellow door ) which is not available to classical computers allows a quantum speed up. the example above denotes a single qubit however as you add more and more qubits the function of n to the power of 2 is multiplied by the number of cubits.

[@TheDoctorRulesPSN]

First of all, quantum computing will not be used for video games or for personal use. This technology has the potential to solve extremely difficult problems in various sciences- like medicine. Eventually, someone will be able to use a quantum computer to fully understand cellular processes and in turn, manufacture powerful medications.

[@kylemallard738]

True, but by computing a calculation in seconds compared to 10^9 years, you can definitely afford multiple tests until the right key is obtained.

[@isodoublet]

Theirs isn't a quantum computer in the same sense. It performs a procedure called quantum annealing which is appropriate for certain optimization problems but not general quantum computer solvable problems.

[@nickchahley3838]

This will revolutionize the Ti-83 graphic calculator. FINALLY!

[@fabuloustaric3308]

Nick Chahley Schools wont let you use them because they are "too smart."

[@2011blueman]

Nick Chahley Not sure you'd want carry the helium 3 helium 4 dilution refrigerator around in your backpack.

[@TheMineBen]

AHAHAHAHAH

[@stankwho]

I believe they need to attach the T-1000 module to the flux capacitor to for voltron fusion to be possible.

[@americancitizen748]

Don't forget the extra Duracell battery.

[@computerfraudandabuseactof43]

Does it have a cathode ray tube output?

[@americancitizen748]

You can add that. Will cost another $1.8 million in government grants.

[@ciph3r836]

You can't make a transistor smaller . Keep the transistor of small size and increase the chip area

[@bethisgg5653]

whats the starting sound? its pretteh chill m8-

[@Smokestacktics]

Because silicon computers, what we are currently using, will reach max computing power in 15 years or so. Quantum computers have no real limits on computing power that we know of. It is just a matter of discerning effective methods to turning that higher power into an effective and accurate means of computation.

[@ralphwalters906]

Yes, very very interesting, and a little disturbing. Maybe the proposition that we live in a multiverse has some legs. When we get down to the very fundamental level of nature, we arrive at a sort of gateway to other universes with different sets of physical/mathematical principles. 48% of the time the experiment shows that we are "here", and 52% of the time we are somewhere else, wherever that may be.

[@hyperrealhank]

amazing achievement

[@aaron4820]

Yeah I was just about to ask that then I saw your post, it would be very useful if 48% of the time, 15=3*5, and 52% of the time it's all over the place, so that you know whatever the constant is almost 50% of the time, then that is the right answer... but if 52% of the time you get the same wrong answer (say 5*2)... then there's no way I could tell if 5*2 is the right answer or 5*3 is the right answer in practice..

[@JeremyKilroy]

So in order to make it a functional computer. It needs an algorithm that runs what ever you are calculating several times, two arrays with each being run let's say 5 times , if the same value is returned 2 times out of 5 it returns that value to the first array. It does the same thing again and if it returns the same value twice out of five it returns that value as the correct value to the second array. Then it compares the arrays if they have the same value it returns it as the correct calculation and then proceeds to the next calculation, else it reruns the calculation. I think that would work.

[@wmn682]

Why is the solution of 1 x 15 not an option? Does this account for the reason 3 x 5 was the solution 48% of the time?

[@squeakygerm]

+Bill Nichols he was trying to find the PRIME factors of fifteen. 1 and 15 are factors of 15 but 1 is not prime.

[@Dhirallin]

Nar it'd just just return wrong answers the other 52%, but they'd probably be different wrong numbers, so the the right answer should still come out more often. And you can plug the factors into a classical computer and check whether they indeed equal the original number. That calculation is practically instant.

[@betamale3]

Looks like its going to be a real boon to mankind, worth every penny.

[@gavindeulufount2043]

Gotta know, what happens with the other 52%? Is it just noise, some kind of imaginary solutions, a product close to 15, non-prime numbers, or what? It would help to understand the whole jig if we knew.

[@PetriSirkkala]

52% of times you get 15 = 7 x 3 or 15 = 1 x 4 and so on. That is not a problem since you can very easily see that they are false. It is just enough to hit the right solution once and check it. You see if the number was 2048bits long you could run it a hundred times and get 48 correct answers. Voila all you need is one correct answer. And that you will not get in traditional computing before lights go out literally.

[@gavindeulufount2043]

Nice explanation man, thanks

[@burlapsack7759]

Petri Sirkkala not to mention you could pair the quantum output with a traditional computer to do the reverse or multiplying the two primes and checking to see if the result is correct.

[@sorcerersupreme1327]

What if your device is working just fine and quantumly speaking? 48% of the time the results are indeed 3 and 5. 52% of the time it is 1 and 15 and -3 and -5

[@socksbigred]

not gonna lie, was down with the intro music

[@gavindeulufount2043]

@superstrongholdkapo- "What exactly does this mean? That math is a partial illusion?" It's still all based on math. A problem that's hard from one approach is solvable from another. Especially when you're changing the whole basis of computing from the 'mechanical' macro-world to probabilistic single particles.

[@TimTeatro]

I saw iPython and matplotlib! Woot!

[@ZionJW]

did he go to slvhs because the stool he was sitting on looks like the ones we make

[@mookt22]

so when are they going to solve the issue of thermal noise wiping out all the data? or are we going to be expected to have freezers capable of reaching -273 degrees C under our computer desk? this is never coming to your average consumer, at least not in our lifetimes.

[@SignatureCha0s]

There's actually a programming language being developed that should work with quantum computers (at least according to simulations and theory) called qBasic.

[@TURNKEYiNK]

SignatureCha0s Lol ...nothing new under the sun.

[@americancitizen748]

Q-BASIC is Quick BASIC.

[@michaelwright9432]

But does it blend?

[@RomanSilva21]

😂😂😂😂

[@bfries555]

Quantum computer dust, dont breathe that

[@yoyofargo]

3:43 Is... :| Is that windows xp running in 2012?

[@ngzbblax]

yoyofargo windows xp is the best windows!!!

[@natcopeland4214]

very interesting

[@antocabal7499]

Lotto uses the same computing vector of 15. This took me less than a min to fig out. 0 thru 9 from dust to ash. Think about that for a moment.

[@simplecrs13]

Can it play Crysis?

[@MostlyPennyCat]

Just... please make sure there's one in my phone for encryption before there's one at GCHQ or the NSA listening to my phone. Ta.

[@WTCorn]

What is this?

[@davidwilkie9551]

Hypothetically (?), the self-organization of the Quantum Fields Mechanism, is what atomic structures in the Standard Model and Periodic Table are, all resonant summed history, phase-locked together in chemistry and physics, and are arranged according to the languages of mathematics in our perceptions to behave in particular "computed" ways of psudo-randomness. Ie if we can remove the "noise" of the annealing process, then a predetermined result of superposition will match the actual state output by the device, ("The Babbage accuracy of construction problem"). It's the ultimate parallel processing by design using an effect similar to the growth of spacetime-elemental grains (of primes) in crystal-coordinate resonance? Sum of all histories, now to now=>eternal constant/resonance. If the analog computation, (another name for an analogy by simplified comparison), is continued, then it's the readout of results that is the determining factor, (literally), of a successful operation, and so the methods and devices used in MRI, tuned to the desired range of solutions, is critical? (And possibly a compound set of scanning frequencies like WiFi in reverse..) It's analogous to the "hard problem" of mind in body, because it's a phase-locked distribution of QM-Time, Q-chemistry by Fields Modulation Mechanism e-Pi-i resonance embodiment. If coherence is disturbed, the content in context connection goes very wrong, because the singularity synchronisation of the Quantum principle is also the Quantum Operator of the Exclusion Principle. The nearest "device" analogous to the imagined operations of a Quantum Computer is possibly emulated by Human Savants, and that seems to be based on intense focus and vast memory storage with bio-logical Random Access (?) If structures, =events, within the Universe are resonance grains of spacetime, and bio-logical organisms are integrated multi-oscillator quantum information computation, insect colonies are hive-mind distributed computation, then brain-body organisms are integrated cellular hive-mind, up to the levels of self-recognition and "consciousness". Everything is phase-locked in resonance and timing spacing coherence/exclusion of cofactor-primes, AM-FM phenomena. One Multiverse ghost of coherence in one Quantum Computational Machine?

[@superstrongholdkapo]

What exactly does this mean? That math is a partial illusion?

[@user-du4kp8nh9o]

if we seek the prime factors of N = p x q, “N equals post wrong question” can’t seek a “prime n quick” solution with no me in we. no equal prize nor request for prime n priwe then → pri the answer is pri

[@SLIvista]

Well considering how much computing power we could have compartively now, the worlds fastest computer will be like a calculator if we can achieve this processing power, which i would think help the medical field find cures vastly quicker, "However, the computational basis of 500 qubits, for example, would already be too large to be represented on a classical computer because it would require 2500 complex values (2501 bits) to be stored.[1"

[@MindTrip888]

In my imaginings of better computing, I always thought that a knowledge base in 3D space, would become the standard. It would contain all of mankind's knowledge to date. A clone of Artificial Intelligences would have it as their base. But something I was reckoning on was 3D positioning could effect things by the interactions of actual electro/magnetically at some static level, would influence each other... but I did fail to say at the beginning this was for AI in 3D space... with the concept put forth that all knowledge has its place in logic compared to all other knowledge. And therefore would have its best positioning in 3D structure, a bit like a brain, but better. As it can be logically "wired" before it is designed to mass produced by machine into the solid unit. That is it evolves a Virtual add on for all its learning, so that in the next major upgrade, all of the AI's combine their data, so all get the new upgrade, either virtually or in the 3D mass produced new base model. Then again, it could be colours and crystals at some point, making binary a fraz of billions of colours...

[@SassInYourClass]

How could quantum computing be reliably used with an ideal success rate of 50%?

[@upplsuckimcool16]

If the Qbit can be 1 AND 0 wouldn't that make for an almost infinite amount of storage space?

[@niteshtripathi678]

+upplsuckimcool16 qbit can be 1 or 0 or any fraction between those two number.. but when the qbit is read then it has either the value of 1 or 0 at that instant...

[@B20C0]

The hard to grasp concept of particle wave duality.

[@gkkleyn]

Could it reliably return data?

[@americancitizen748]

Unfortunately it still takes a machine the size of a room to operate on just a few bits.

[@crazieeez]

"I have been working about 5 years to factor 15" :D

[@watkinscopicat]

I don't get it. What was the point of all that?

[@JayBest]

He was able to run a calculation which would have taken the entire duration of the universe to calculate, except he was able to do it in about 10 seconds. Once this becomes mainstream Quantum computers will be orders of magnitutude more powerful, and also allow for transmission of information where if anyone snoops on the content, then it alerts that someone else has observed it. Pretty fucking cool.

[@y35n00b5]

Jay Best This is prediction and theory....not fact.

[@JayBest]

Oh for sure, but they were able to run some real life quantum calcs. Also these days D-Wave is seeming to be kicking this off these days?

[@JohnMerrell]

so modest....

[@Cpt935]

This will ruin all online security. All sensible data have to be taken offline if this is accessable to anyone.

[@Saki630]

You should have nothing to worry about, these wont be around for decades, within that time everything you do online will be common knowledge accessible to anyone who knows your twitter ID or Facebook image which will both replace social security or personal identification cards.

[@burlapsack7759]

Felix Kemmer If we have computers that can solve these ridiculously high composite numbers, we can simply use much much higher numbers for encryption. Not a big deal.

[@theguythatcoment]

Adrian Godoy they said the exact same thing

[@d.sherman8563]

Felix We would start using quantum encryption.

[@gauravarya8952]

And Northrup bought a Q comp for "Unknown purposes" :)

[@xXAkirhaXx]

If we had 10 million qubits working optimally we'd have enough computing power and data to store every electron, photon, and atom in the universe in so many different states that writing down the number of different state universes would take longer to write than the age of the universe.

[@burlapsack7759]

The funny thing. 10 million qubits wouldn't be hard to achieve either. The hard thing is simply getting the architecture to work properly. We could already make a chip with that many qubits if not more, just wouldn't work.

[@justgao]

Actually, you only need 500 qubits for all the information in the universe.

[@thedoc2994]

« And then we cool it down to almost absolute zero » wtf does absolute zero even mean?

[@LautaroLosio]

Zero Kelvin. Google that to get mindfucked a while...

[@americancitizen748]

It means all the little particles stop moving.

[@sosansatstu3831]

The Thugger -273℉

[@americancitizen748]

Wear your mittens.

[@americancitizen748]

If you have to "verify" the result using a traditional computer then you will have a problem. Consider Gödel's incompleteness theorems -- if you can solve a problem with a quantum computer that same problem will not be solvable on a traditional computer. If a quantum computer is only "sometimes" correct then you will never be able to verify an quantum answer by checking it on a conventional computer.

[@suesheification]

American Citizen n*p is very simple for a computer to check

[@weihongli9615]

👍

[@Zander101084]

we hope

[@jameswoodfine6047]

although you say that but didnt the computers we used today started just for very high places like governments, medical, science and big companies. so maybe in 40 to 50 years time we could have quantum computers in are houses playing crysis 23.0

[@petestorey1573]

What do we not know that a quantum computer could tell us?

[@laharl2k]

4:08 Python?

[@_Nibi]

looks like it, who cares.

[@superoxidedismutor]

8:30 ever heard of armaflex, guys?

[@leinadem2]

D-wave is selling Quantum computers with 512 qubits already, Google just bought one for 10 millions

[@polishfish]

strawberry basket refreshments!

[@zimonslot]

Right now I'm hoping quantum computing will fail because if it succeeds it will be the end of the internet. Maybe that is a good thing in the end though..

[@KazeKumo]

Why they don't use AI like DeepMind to solve the programe to run the quantum computing? If using human itself to programme such things, it's gonna take time.

[@TheNorthernBureau]

"But what...is it good for?" -- Engineer at the Advanced Computing Systems Division of IBM, 1968, commenting on the microchip.

[@Sub_division_]

man i wish i had this kind of intelligence and know how..

[@mukulvdhiman]

Seriously, people here are so hateful, these all people are like the dude who said,"There might be a market for only 10 computers." People don't realise how useful this technology is. This can enable you to exhaust near to infinite probabilities, like finding a new stable drug, simulating possible outcomes to complex problems, etc. These computers might not make it to your home, they are going to replace the supercomputers.

[@davidbrown4868]

You are so right....

[@americancitizen748]

Your bank balance is only $15. But only 48% of the time? This is going to make accounting difficult!

[@ENetArch]

That's it? Nothing about how you used Shor's Algo to get to 15 = 3x5??? Well that was disappointing =( I get that it's a massive achievement to do that in a quantum computer, but I was hoping for a more indepth analysis / explanation of how you were able to get there. The Math. How the processor reached an equalibruim state. How you used a series of processes. This still seems like magic and wishful thinking to spend all this time trying to get a quantum computer to evaluate a complex system and have it spit out a result that may be 50% correct.

[@erionjaho]

D-Wave company just created one and sold for 10 million$

[@MrWr99]

3*5=15 40%!

[@TheR3alRu5h]

50%

[@DragonsREpic]

10 million*

[@laketuna]

10:02 The questioner's scalp looks weird.

[@aronhighgrove4100]

+Youn Kim He is balding. I hope for you nobody will be as superficial as you are when it happens to you.

[@TheUnown4]

That fidget spinner t-shirt

[@badpanda84]

""First of all, quantum computing will not be used for video games or for personal use"" LOL it would be pretty funny if the first thing people did was play minesweeper or solitare. If calculating 5 x 3 = 15.. is a breakthough... then playing minesweeper would be amazing

[@Rospajother]

If the algorithm works on a digital computer already what is the significance of 3x5 = 15 with a 52% error, nothing ground breaking here

[@rocket1126]

R Robin it’s supposed to be 50% 3x5, and 50% 5x3, they got 48% 3x5

[@1stJamesStone]

It will be the end of eCommerce as we know it...

[@RickietickieDutchover]

Rick

[@hi9580]

Quantum Computering

[@SevastianNandez]

Dont our brains work like quantum computers?

[@SevastianNandez]

if so, why dont we look and try so simulate our brain and quantum computers and see how to stabilize the atoms since our brain apparently doesn't seem to be disturbed like quantum computers are disturbed by fucking anything and make the atoms go all over the place.

[@stevebluh]

I like this idea. Our brain ignores a lot of information, alters and destroys too. but what if we could make it better?

[@satyampatel491]

No the brain works nothing like a quantum computer.

[@SevastianNandez]

Satyam Patel well our brain uses electrons etc from our nervous system that is what im trying to say. Its obviously not exacly the same but builds on the same idea of particles.

[@ryangunnison38]

In a very simplified way, out brain is like a molecular computer, another variety of computer composed without the stress and randomness of quantum computers. Except it doesn't run like normal computers, constant electrical charges are coursing through the brain making permanent connections that take the form of memories and thought processes