I would say this rocket was 90% successful, the last cluster did not ignite correctly (that is why it spiraled). It is a 4x4 multi-cluster rocket. x8 D12-0's and x8 C6-0's!!!
Пікірлер: 374
@napalaprentice7 жыл бұрын
this video shows perfectly what happens when staging goes wrong.
@jjthefed4 жыл бұрын
The best is when you get about a 100 degree turn down from vertical between stages and it begins heading towards the nearby school.
@moldzillam2613 жыл бұрын
jjthefed I got a rocket stuck on a school, this was back in 2015 when I was in elementary school. Me and my dad went to the play ground in the back of the school. And normally it would be ok but this time the wind took it and brought it to the roof. So the next day I go up to the office and ask the janitors to go up there (there is a ladder that goes up there, it’s inside) and grab the rocket, they got it for me and at the end of the day I walked out of the school with the rocket in my hand. I got lots of questions about it so I just told them it’s my ballistic missile.
@2fathomsdeeper3 жыл бұрын
@@jjthefed Even better when you have RC guidance, and they don't wait for the thrust to end before jumping on the controls! Then it's a tube launched, two stage, H engined, spinny whirly bomb from hell! Once we got that working, we built a laser guided missile, that could hit within 4 feet of the aimpoint at 500 yards. Not too shabby for a couple of 16 yo kids! Those were the fun days!
@DeputyNordburg3 жыл бұрын
this video shows why 16 small engines should not replace one larger one.
@Chris-io2cs3 жыл бұрын
@@2fathomsdeeper sorry if I sound skeptical but that sounds pretty impressive if true, and like you point out, even more so at the age of 16. Does footage of any of your launches exist? If so you should post it. Sounds interesting. I'm most curious exactly how you implemented the laser guiding system but would like to see what you mean by launch tube as well. You threw a lot of info in there that deserves better explaining haha.
@shadowprince44822 жыл бұрын
The thing I love about science is that failure is always an option. This was risky but went surprisingly well. 😀
@kingwillie2067 жыл бұрын
That's what I imagine a home made Taliban missile looks like.
@olgutza237 жыл бұрын
this is whats ganna happen if ants try to go to space lol
@davidedwinbloyd3 жыл бұрын
You are Hilarious! Be Blessed as you follow The Holy Spirit! I hope to hear from you. David
@pforce97 жыл бұрын
I made a rocket similar to yours with three engines stacked, not clustered. Because of t he weight at the rear, I had these really big fins attached to the engine sections. Anyhow, when we lit it off, the thing was so heavy that the first stage slowly raised it to about fifty feet and then it seemed to slow a little and then the next stage cut in. The difference between the first stage and the second stage was dramatic as the rocket lost about a forth of its weight and it was already moving when that second stage cut it and drove it almost out of sight. At a distance we could see the third stage cut in and it went out of sight for awhile. One thing will stick in my mind was that rocket lighting off that second stage from almost a standstill at about 50 feet off the ground.
@Tech_Planet7 жыл бұрын
Cool, thanks for sharing, you built an impressive rocket :)
@spencerjones18445 жыл бұрын
I bet that was something to see
@darwinthompson3915 жыл бұрын
Sounds pretty neat actually. ..
@johnkennedyk5227 жыл бұрын
work's better than I thought it would. keep up the good work.
@slobtob27837 жыл бұрын
I did something like that it was all going fine but then there was a delay between the 2nd and 3rd motors so it started falling nose first then the 3rd motor ignited and it shot threw my shed
@karynjohnson5 жыл бұрын
Insane
@LucasTheF3 жыл бұрын
lmaoo
@Mrcaffinebean3 жыл бұрын
Haha that is hilarious, I can just imagine the sheer excitement and then terror 😂
@acdii3 жыл бұрын
I have a friend, back 30 years or so ago, he would fill up short rockets with fireworks guts, and use a first stage D. They were pretty awesome until one he made a little TOO heavy. Made it halfway up the guide wire and just hung there. Never did find the pieces of the launch tower. Pretty sure the public works guys were plenty pissed at the huge dead ring of grass too.
@simplywonderful4493 жыл бұрын
YOU MUST NOT BE "CERTIFIED"!
@soundspartan7 жыл бұрын
Well...I think it was AWESOME! Thanks for posting this, it is a great video! Explaining things afterwards is very important, and appreciated! Safety FIRST...then...HAVE FUN! THANKS!
@dukecityfisherman57887 жыл бұрын
looks like little JD had fun at arts and crafts today
@SteveKasian7 жыл бұрын
Thanks for explaining why it's so cool!
@falcoperegrinus823 жыл бұрын
Wow, homeboy glued the "wings" directly to the engines and did it with kindergarten glue. Smh...
@danielgregory32953 жыл бұрын
Clearly no intention to recover or reuse the lower stages...and did that many engines exceed the Safety Code?
@johnmarksmith11203 жыл бұрын
Hey sport, why don’t you post a video of how he should have done it. Smh...
@danielgregory32953 жыл бұрын
@@johnmarksmith1120 for starters, clustering upper stages is not recommended, or wise..😞
@dozer16423 жыл бұрын
Some of those “wings” are straight too.
@johnsantos12255 жыл бұрын
Awesome! All I kept thinking is I'm glad I don't have to go find it haha.
@Brandon_Makes_Stuff7 жыл бұрын
I did not expect that to work. Awesome!
@alphaadhito7 жыл бұрын
Seems like KSP in real life: "Moar Booster!"
@Cabo_TheManFromCaboWabo Жыл бұрын
Many people ask why. I ask why not. Then there’s the people who ask why not, film it and put it on KZbin. Good video 👍🏻
@Tech_Planet8 жыл бұрын
Hey there, I hope that was fun to watch! I appreciate the feedback over the years and I will try to build a better rocket that is more reliable/safe than this crazy thing heh
@Sarasmile208 жыл бұрын
+JD Rock it was awesome!!!
@gertnood8 жыл бұрын
+JD Rock I wouldn't say this is the first.. all kinds of crazy stuff like this has been done over the years. But it is cool and fun. I built a number of glued together cluster boosters on a series of rail rockets in the early '90's, the largest successful one 11 stages with 4 D12-0 as first stage.
@Sarasmile208 жыл бұрын
gertnood cool
@Tech_Planet8 жыл бұрын
+gertnood Good old D12-0, they are the best multistage engine to use in my opinion. You should build another one!
@Sarasmile208 жыл бұрын
cool thanks bro!!!!
@SuperPersianLord7 жыл бұрын
Looks like you had an O-ring failure.
@SteveKasian7 жыл бұрын
Except that there are no O-rings in Estes single-use model rocket engines. You've gotta get up into the larger re-loadable motor designs before you start encountering O-rings.
@-danR7 жыл бұрын
y'see, there was a joke in that, you just have to poke around for it.
@bernardszeszol56997 жыл бұрын
I picked up on that right away. Good one!
@pnkflyd667 жыл бұрын
SuperPersianLord - The smoke pattern was eerily similar to the Challenger shuttle. I was thinking the same thing!
@brandysigmon90667 жыл бұрын
That was the first thing I thought of was the challenger launch, lol
@georgeskaff95013 жыл бұрын
First mistake was to make the fins all the same size.On any staged rocket the booster stage fins have to be bigger than the upper stage to provide the proper balance.The second was to not use lower powered motors in the upper stages, the largest motor should always be used in the booster stage.Those are the basic design elements of multi staging.Thirty plus years of experience has taught me that.
@marknesselhaus43763 жыл бұрын
Much better than I expected. Great job getting the clusters to work that well :-)
@carpma112 жыл бұрын
Wow, I honestly didn't think that would work. Awesome!
@tstahler54203 жыл бұрын
I was a "certified" 10 year old building modified rockets. LOL
@glennkrieger6 жыл бұрын
I know from experience that precision in making a rocket is paramount. Cutting, fastening, and aligning everything as best as possible does make a difference. Included in that is the slightly lopsided nose cone, which at the speed the rocket is traveling, will direct airflow over the entire rocket asymmetrically. This creates air eddie currents that will change the effect of the fins have at the bottom, causing the rocket to sway, spin, and waste a lot of the engines energies. Also, the weight of your rocket body is significantly changing your altitude. Using a thin-walled PVC tube of the same diameter would give you hundreds of feet of higher altitude, without compromising strength. After all, with all that work wouldn't you want to go as high as possible?
@mishapatapovich39965 жыл бұрын
See flat earthers, even from a small model rocket you could see that the earth is round
@CaptainEverythingHumorandMore7 жыл бұрын
I Agree it is cool. I thought those engines would have went higher but it's ok. Would like to see 16 of them in as one long engine. Good job, nice experiment.
@lutain1877 жыл бұрын
hell ya keep up the good work that was super cool
@remoteportal7 жыл бұрын
CRAZY!
@McClenaghanSR7 жыл бұрын
Estes Rocket engines used to call this "basement bombing". Too bad. It's so much fun......
@falco8304 жыл бұрын
This is Kerbal Space Program type rocket building...
@minerran3 жыл бұрын
four stages, never saw that before. interesting. seemed very stable until the staging went awry, nice job.
@harveydecker63813 жыл бұрын
Very cool ! Thanks
@jupitorman7 жыл бұрын
bro just brill well done
@folf6 жыл бұрын
I don't need to be _'certified'_ to launch a rocket THAT small!
@demej006 жыл бұрын
Cool. I saw the curvature of the earth! (haha)
@cristiamjulianayalapena31905 жыл бұрын
You are so amazing!
@viktorrietveld3 жыл бұрын
Much Kerbal, much staging, such awesome
@stephaniebiro77782 жыл бұрын
Ok so yes in fact I am velosity projection engineer, "ROCKET SCIENTIST" and a suggestion you use blue light or "uv" superglue or light activated epoxy, far far superior to your bonding agents..Elmer's glue, theres high quality light activated bonding glue is actually very affordable and can even stop through wallmart and pick up these products
@joeventura17 жыл бұрын
"Dont do this unless you are certified" LOL I think you are certified in "Glue gun"
@Tech_Planet7 жыл бұрын
& proud of it!
@JJAPE5 жыл бұрын
First thing I noticed was the crooked nose cone. Then I clicked off(:
@FireheadLazzo4 жыл бұрын
You clicked away from the possibility of seeing a rocket failure? Do you also fast forward through the titty scenes in slasher movies?
@kristarichards59134 жыл бұрын
@@FireheadLazzo *sweeting*- possibly i do:|
@ironicman67314 жыл бұрын
@@FireheadLazzo he clicked away cause this guy is clearly an amateur
@mftepera3 жыл бұрын
I always wanted to do this. Very cool.
@P61guy614 жыл бұрын
Excellent
@shamusk19867 жыл бұрын
so how exactly do you get "certified" to build these jury rigged rockets?
@distanttraveler65316 жыл бұрын
Obvious that he meant to get certified rather then building rigged rockets...
@lochinvar004656 жыл бұрын
I doubt that he is certified. One look at the rocket told me that. To begin with, the fin sizes are problematic. And staging clusters is not for the faint of heart, as his rocket showed. There should be a positive ignition for all engines of a stage simultaneously at the proper time.
@paulbarlow82866 жыл бұрын
Gerry-rigged. Slang for German. WW2 reference.
@luisderivas60056 жыл бұрын
I agree. One look at the build, and I seriously doubt he has NAR Level 1 certification covering multi-motor rocket models like this one. I don't think this would have passed the requisite safety inspection. Also the certification team is required to observe the flight and render post-flight inspection. However, I think the model would need to use at least one H+ motor, as part of, or in addition to the cluster to be considered certifiable for Level 1. As such this model rides the line as experimental, and not a good design at that.
@chouseification6 жыл бұрын
If you're going to correct somebody, at least get it right. He was correct - the phrase is "jury rigged"; not "jerry rigged" or "gerry rigged"... whoever taught you (and all of the other people) the name was wrong.
@Joeybagofdonuts766 жыл бұрын
That was impressive.
@Ryzler136 жыл бұрын
WOW you got up a full 100 feet.
@manmonster23137 жыл бұрын
AWESOME
@tyr0n313 Жыл бұрын
What was that beacon locator you used? I tried Tiles and they are terrible.
@TheJoeyboots3 жыл бұрын
Well done! Wild 😜
@jackspeer212722 күн бұрын
that was VERY clever.
@melplishka59783 жыл бұрын
I made a wireless igniter with a 5 dollar chins transmitter and receiver with a 18 v cordless battery for the igniters. You can use it up to 400 ft if ya want. Never had a miss fire with it.
@thefreewayoctopus4 жыл бұрын
@Tech Planet very cool rocket it is too bad some motors didn't ignite or it would've been even better. How high did it go? The locators should tell you.
@williambresinski67067 жыл бұрын
how did you go about solving the simultaneous ignition problem using four engines at a time like that?
@lochinvar004656 жыл бұрын
cross your fingers, of course.
@willd51054 жыл бұрын
It's hard enough to ensure one airborne engine ignites and stages properly. To attempt to parallel and stage each 3 engine cluster in the manner shown resulted in the predictable waste of engines seen when at least one of the second stage engines failed to ignite and the third stage fired so asymmetrically that it failed to separate and whatever fire chain that did make it to the fourth stage poured all it's thrust into the shells of the burned out lower stage engines still attached , but the instability caused by the second stage uneven weight distribution had already spoiled the desired vertical acceleration into a sideways pointing trajectory. It makes more sense to cluster your first stage and use a single second stage engine with numerous redundancies built in to ensure ignition and prompt separation of the first stage.
@demej003 жыл бұрын
How high did it go? How high did you expect it to go?
@DTORRE-hl7fl7 жыл бұрын
What material was your cone made out of? @JDRock I am making a rocket very similiar to yours in the video, just struggling to make/find a solution for my nose cone
@Tech_Planet7 жыл бұрын
All my cones are made out of plastic and pre-made. I buy them from a local hobby store.
@pauls57456 жыл бұрын
using a blast deflector is good so you don't leave burn marks on the land. -1 for a sketchy build, but thanks for sharing
@billybracewell28937 жыл бұрын
GREAT design!! I would like to give you a few pointers, NOT critiques. Rocket design takes many forms and sizes. and if PERFECTLY built may still do poorly. But the sport DOES have a few necessary points that need critical attention. 1) a rocket of that size and power can be said to be "nearly" supersonic. THAT changes the airflow greatly. I would do away with the pointy nose cone or modify it with a small teardrop shaped bead. mounted on the point with ITS pointy end out. No more than 1/3rd the diameter of the main body tube. Air at those speeds is more like thin oil or water. It's a "breaker" It causes the thick fast air to jump out and flow neatly down the sides of the "body" of the craft. 2) Pay WAY more attention to you wings. Sweep them like an F-86 Saberjet. Sharpen the leading edges being careful to keep the edges EXACTLY in the center of the edge. Slightly round the trailing edge to reduce "let-off" turbulence. They MUST be exactly in line with each other. And all the exact same size/thickness. 3) shorten your tube some. use a larger tube size with a clear section to mount camera in. The odd shape of the camera pack taped on is causing uneven airflow over your wings. 4) Lastly but somewhat importantly, make sure that after the craft is after final stage separation that the tail is STILL just a tad heavier than the nose. Should see great improvement and a lot more fun!
@Tech_Planet6 жыл бұрын
Thanks, really good tips!
@PENTADACTYLON7 жыл бұрын
very nice fly, ..., how much feet of elevation ?...
@CF-tf2bz6 жыл бұрын
Violations from the NAR code. Sheesh
@rreeves07106 жыл бұрын
KZbin recommended a non trash video? WHAT? But yeah... Cool video dude!
@spetsnatzlegion33663 жыл бұрын
Okay now we’re getting seriously kerbal
@hadleymanmusic3 жыл бұрын
Always blow a little firecracker dust into the upper stage engines
@stilltuckered5 жыл бұрын
How did you connect the rocket motor ignites together, so that you could insure that they all ignited at the same time?
@Tech_Planet5 жыл бұрын
It was quite awhile ago but I believe they are in parallel. I use 4 cell battery and higher.
@qsmxpilot45996 жыл бұрын
Why do this? Why not move up into an E or F engine?
@normellow7 жыл бұрын
Make sure to use black powder in-between motors
@Tech_Planet7 жыл бұрын
Black powder? Does that help ensure the ejection charge happens correctly?
@danbytp7 жыл бұрын
JD Rock Yes it helps.It will burn at at a good speed and temp to help with a slight booster push up and ignite the next stage engines.There's some math involved that I let my math geek of a cousin have fun with.As long as I buy the beer.
@Tech_Planet7 жыл бұрын
Cool, I will have to try that!
@Kevinegan16 жыл бұрын
You didn't launch a rocket. You launched a stick.
@dwightbrown28086 жыл бұрын
Wafer glass fins and black shaft tubing?
@krishnakumarkrishnakumar44315 жыл бұрын
I like it
@joelblevins4 жыл бұрын
Would have performed better if you would have used masking tape to attach each stack and then glued them in place. Not all of the motors fired due to that and would have also flown much more stable. Also. Use just a short section of the dowel at the base to adapt to cardboard tube for the rest of the length to cut the weight down significantly 😉
@JohnSchlesser4 жыл бұрын
Where did you get the cameras?
@timlown50366 жыл бұрын
How does one get a certification to build and fly a solid fuel rocket ?
@ZZvaderZZ7 жыл бұрын
Awesome
@SirFloofy0017 жыл бұрын
4x4 engine= awesomeness
@bestamerica7 жыл бұрын
' that is so coooool small videocamera on the model rocket and launch fly away... what is name of videocamera
@JamesRMills12 жыл бұрын
If you add small forward fins near the nose cone to stabilize when separation occurs.
@The-KP2 жыл бұрын
Yielded the classic STS Challenger explosion with twin horns smoke trail.. well done, I guess. Btw the nosecone was visibly crooked, pre-launch.
@limitlessenergy3693 жыл бұрын
Spin me round baby right round
@joerag60776 жыл бұрын
Delta wings are not triangle?
@welshpete124 жыл бұрын
I wonder what height you get with that ?
@schradersl4 жыл бұрын
It flew well. I tried a 3-3-3 as a kid.Similar issue with last stage.
@deanenterline17605 жыл бұрын
YOUR ROCKET LOOKS LIKE HELL...
@jenshendriks90926 жыл бұрын
Also make sure you just get industrial colle glue. It works better and there's no ugly mess at the bottom of them.
@JoeOvercoat7 жыл бұрын
Sweet.
@immrnoidall7 жыл бұрын
we crushed these engines with a hammer to get the explosives and made bombs when i was a kid. how times have changed.
@michaelfleming50756 жыл бұрын
Damn, Kerbal looks realistic now
@APKAK-14656 жыл бұрын
RIP camera
@mrtuvok55786 жыл бұрын
Remindes me of that movie gravity 1:05
@imaxdigital70522 жыл бұрын
*Make sure you're certified when building these bigger rockets*
@lisawarner48588 жыл бұрын
Pleasing video! n_n
@profesorpancake13723 жыл бұрын
Astronaut 1: it's all stages Astronaut 2: always has been
@MrKillb87 жыл бұрын
Neat
@StropSharp7 жыл бұрын
nose cone looks a bit crooked, that explains the gyrations...sooner or later those engines might go flying off. Good ignition system I'll give you that.
@MRTBnMRSKB7 жыл бұрын
C D Kennedy ioiiiy.kummmk, mnm, Bkjgbhuvgtukn yt f4 f54 dd 44 d t c 4 fc 5f 5 ct5 ct 5 cr5 crv d4yii You
@joshuagargalione3787 жыл бұрын
what was apogee?
@80amnesia7 жыл бұрын
nice
@TheJunkyardgenius4 жыл бұрын
Could you take the motors apart take out the propellent and make a much bigger rocket motor?
@DeansVideoClips7 жыл бұрын
Are you certified? They look pretty dodgy to me for a certified rocket builder! Fun to watch though!
@folf6 жыл бұрын
DeansVideoClips He's certified by himself and said "don't do this unless your certified" so he wouldn't get on the NSA watch list
@douglasdobson81106 жыл бұрын
I guess theres a difference between making it work and making it pretty lol. What I want to know is what altitude is it hitting?
@MRBILL-dr2wr4 жыл бұрын
Model rocket certifications a fucking joke
@gregg41647 жыл бұрын
Coming in hot.
@VulcanGamesReal7 жыл бұрын
I was working on a similer projec, and I got all 7 engines to ignite! Before... One... Exploded.... whoops
@larsvd53548 жыл бұрын
Nice work! How did you made sure that the engines can detach from the structure after they are burned out?
@Tech_Planet8 жыл бұрын
+LARS VD The last stage does not separate, they just push the plastic part up so the parachute comes out. It took a couple of years to figure out heh
@larsvd53548 жыл бұрын
+JD Rock Okay but how does a burned out/used stage seperate from the rest? Is it simply loosely mounted and blown off by the thrust of the new stage?
@Tech_Planet8 жыл бұрын
+LARS VD That is correct, there is a special technique to glue it. You have to use school glue and only put 4 points on each engine. Do not use super glue, it won't separate.
@danielgregory32953 жыл бұрын
@@larsvd5354 The Estes tech report recommended a single wrap of cellophane tape, firmly rolled in place.
@acdii3 жыл бұрын
Uses a 3S Lipo, a dead short and it won't be the rocket engines lighting off when the button is pressed. Be very careful when using a Lipo for anything, a fully charged one can ignite if shorted.
@JoseGonzalez-jz1le2 жыл бұрын
Looked like the space shuttle challenger
@Gump4207 жыл бұрын
Where can I find a beacon locator like the one in the video?
@Tech_Planet7 жыл бұрын
Hi, this is the tracking locator www.loc8tor.com/everyday/