"One farmer even can kill 10 samurai with Pike" -Oda Nobunaga
@theunknownfencer63362 жыл бұрын
What? that doesn't make any sense
@johnsnow6182 жыл бұрын
@@theunknownfencer6336 don't ask me, ask oda Nobunaga 😂
@armoredangel012 жыл бұрын
@@johnsnow618 Actually it does make sense, I believe what the 'point' Oda Nobunaga is trying to make is that even a farmer, with the proper training, can be turned into a soldier, and a pike is quite an easy weapon to master
@curtiswong72802 жыл бұрын
Yarimazing
@blackpowderkun Жыл бұрын
@@armoredangel01 Thought that's a reference to the Long spear Ashigaru.
@AlexanderTheBloodraven8 ай бұрын
I feel like this time period is massively underrated. This was a transitional period in which all earlier types of tactics and weapons were used alongside the weapons of early modern warfare. Muskets, pistols and cannons were used by knights in armor together with swords, spears, halberds and even crossbows (though the crossbows were mostly phased halfway through). Even the tactics were inspired from earlier ages. For example, the spanish tercios was almost like an abstract combination of both the Macedonian Phalanx and the Roman Cohorts.
@judgeoftruth60585 ай бұрын
This is like final fantasy guns with swords.
@doodlebug182016 күн бұрын
Its not a fast food tier list its horrific
@Fred_L.3 жыл бұрын
Just for the records as to where the scenes are from: 1. Cromwell (1970) 2. Alatriste (2006) 3. The Musketeers (2014-2016 series)
@donwillis91033 жыл бұрын
The Musketeers seemed the most ridiculous of the 3. Alatriste was the most tense, and seemed far more realistic. Nobody alive today could imagine what it was like in the middle of one of those fights staring down a pike.
@adolfoestella46993 жыл бұрын
a hero
@deadby153 жыл бұрын
It’s amazing people were willing to die for kings/queens who didn’t give a d__n about them.
@jeffjerome48053 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU Fred!
@janefelix38213 жыл бұрын
@@donwillis9103 That is because it attempted to put modern morals and PC into a story taking place 500 years ago.
@TFOURIE2 жыл бұрын
That pike battle is absolute horror on the next level - like two porcupines running into each other.
@Kokopilau773 жыл бұрын
I like how the drummer starts advancing, sees some people die, pauses for a sec with a “holy shit, that guy just bit it” then does a double take.
@brp9463 жыл бұрын
I like the 1600s as they are this clash between old and new, you see midevil stuff mixed with early modernism
@lisarino11803 жыл бұрын
It was the last breath of Medieval/Reinassance warfare
@matt.p.60223 жыл бұрын
Wish there were more representations of this period. I'd love to see more of this type of stuff!
@Brokenlance3 жыл бұрын
The 16th century as well (1500’s) where you still have fully kitted knights as well as firearms dominating the battlefield. This was also the beginning of the reign of the Tercio on the battlefield.
@thrifikionor76033 жыл бұрын
@@Brokenlance Not only fully kitted knights as well as firearms. Fully kitted knights WITH firearms, often two at a time.
@AscentofTrollbane3 жыл бұрын
shut up, moron
@garypanter18815 жыл бұрын
Good example of Pike Warfare especially with the sword and buckler men going in under the pikes.
@jesusseoane22965 жыл бұрын
Gary Panter the movie clip is from Capitan Alatriste about the Spanish Tercios with viggo Mortensen
@shaaprosperous15203 жыл бұрын
Why didn't the Romans adopt the Macedonian Phalanx ?
@oscardelafuente86493 жыл бұрын
@@shaaprosperous1520 originally they used it , but moved on to the 3 line system because the Italian terrain was not suited for phalanx combat. the samnite wars are a good starting point
@alexanderhyaguer68273 жыл бұрын
@@oscardelafuente8649 Indeed the romans used phalanx in the early realm before the republic, but they see that a better shield can improve the efectinees of a soldier so they start to use the testudo and increasse the size of the shield until cover almost entirely, so when they fight against greeks they see their phalanx stank untill the heavy roman infantry and they pilums reduce their coerssion. But when they start to encounter cavalry especially in germany and persia, (3,4 century) they restored the medium lance in their infantry formations. And increase the size of their swords.
@spinachmuncher25663 жыл бұрын
is that really how they did it? dodging spears and stabbing each other in the groin? good lord, Renaissance obviously didn't apply to warfare, still as barbaric and savage as it had always been.
@raginasiangaming9103 жыл бұрын
I always said...imagine having to stand in formation in this time period (all the way through the 19th century) and not flinch while exchanging volleys of gunfire with another side less than 50 meters away...took balls of steel to be a grunt then.
@blastroisehunt65462 жыл бұрын
When you are with many, have courage meb
@mikailshakes45142 жыл бұрын
Musket fire are not like bullets, they don't instantly kill
@ApersonIguess-rb6fu2 жыл бұрын
@@mikailshakes4514 actually that's incorrect as musketballs are very much bullets, they may not look like bullets we have today but they are indeed bullets. Also muskets were very much deadly infact if a person was shot by one many times they would be instantly dead (if not from infection later). Unlike modern bullets which have penetration power, musketballs have stopping power meaning they slam into you body leaving huge horrendous wounds tearing apart flesh while shattering bones and turning them into shrapnel in your body so needless to say a person isn't surviving that
@paddyret79682 жыл бұрын
@@mikailshakes4514 "They don't instantly kill" while neither does any bullet really, all depends on where it hits you, and that's not always a good thing. I'd far rather take a ball to the skull than the throat.
@mikailshakes45142 жыл бұрын
@@paddyret7968 Well Muskets are most likely lesser due to the fact that in a lot of 18th century wars, most of the casualties are from untreated wounds and disease
@Romellenios_Lanz_Daemos5 жыл бұрын
I heard the frontline of the Pike units were paid double, since it was expected they're the first to fall.
@enlightenedterrestrial4 жыл бұрын
I think that was the Zweihander soldiers. The frontline of the Pike were usually the most experienced, the best armored people in the army.
@derkylos4 жыл бұрын
Hence the "doppelsoldner" (double mercenary). They fulfilled a role similar to the sword and buckler men as depicted in the 2:30 clip, getting past the pikes to break the enemy's formation. "Zweihander" is a two-handed sword which could be used in such a role. And, yes, they did have the best possible armour as it was the most dangerous place to be. Although I recall a certain English commander in the Civil War who fought in the front rank of his pike formation and was killed within minutes of the battle commencing, leaving his men leaderless...
@duchessskye40724 жыл бұрын
The doppelsöldner did not have greatswords usually, they were a ratio of 50-50 with gunners/crossbowmen and pikemen/halberdiers. Greatsword users were usually stationed at the back, and while they also counted as doppelsöldner they weren't leading the charge. You put a guy with a sword head-on against guys with pikes and all you will accomplish is a dead swordsman. Instead the better use is to use them defensively, or send them wherever is needed in the formation, as was likely done.
@rodrigogimenez-ricolaguna49133 жыл бұрын
In the Spanish Tercios, the best of its times and unbeated for many many years on wars all over Europe, the first lines were reserved for spanish soldiers by their own demand, and with the most war experience.
@velorn89273 жыл бұрын
@@duchessskye4072 it was likely that they where used like Alexander the greats swordsman dude Of course you wouldnt send them first into the front ranks dude You would look for weakness somewhere in the line (your pikeman taking some ground from the enemy, confusion or retreat from pressure) Or try to find a sufficient opening (maybe a opening created by your cavalry that you can exploit to get some guys through, enemy formation could have an opening due to terrain that pike formation cant traverse) to get around the formation to attack it from another angle...Then you send in your swordsmen So you are both right in a sense
@xhagast3 жыл бұрын
Curiously battles were fought rarely. Warfare was more about sieges and ravaging the lands of the enemy. A lost battle could finish a conflict. Even if the loses weren't very big.
@jaysonp942610 ай бұрын
Yep pitched battles were the equivalent of going to the casino with your empire
@pavelstaravoitau71068 ай бұрын
This was the case in Western Europe. When western mercenaries serving the Swedes were hired by Russia in the early 17th century, many complained and eventually munitined because, among many other things, that they had to fight way more often.
@siralexandersequeira3rdcou129 ай бұрын
Seeing a cavalry commander shout "Tally-Ho!" is one of the best things i have seen today.
@adamcheklat73872 ай бұрын
That’s not just a cavalry commander, that’s Prince Rupert of the Rhine, cousin to Charles I.
@siralexandersequeira3rdcou122 ай бұрын
@@adamcheklat7387 Yeah, even better!
@lebarosky3 жыл бұрын
Interesting contrast between Cromwell, Captain Alatriste, and that last film. I think Captain Alatriste is by far the most realistic.
@juanalvarez28303 жыл бұрын
Yes, but spanish gouvernement don't like it, and put down the movie. It's nice movie but poor. Marxismos = sionismos, in Spain. For them : The life arrive in this world with their new order sionist. TOTAL DESTRUCTION OS EUROPA IN 72 LITLE SIDES, ALL CONTROLED BY THEM In 1666 arrive at London from Holland this new order, in 400 boats. They destriud all, to create THE CITY, where they don't pay takes. TAXIS, yes they pay taxis. Only this
@danielleiva93533 жыл бұрын
@@juanalvarez2830 ¿has olvidado tomarte la medicación hoy Juan?
@zurgesmiecal3 жыл бұрын
@@danielleiva9353 Daniel La judía Leiva, gonna cry?
@danielleiva93533 жыл бұрын
@@zurgesmiecal hombre, no me gustan mucho las judías verdes pero tampoco lloraría si hay que comerlas. No os olvidéis del gorrito de papel de plata al salir de casa. Saludos
@zacharywiedner3273 жыл бұрын
Cromwell has the best 1000 foot view. Formations, deployment and movement of units, scale of battle, etc. Alatriste has the more realistic 'close up' depiction, showing that slow, desperate, and brutal grind fight between the pike lines. Both are great.
@Tom-bm2kt3 жыл бұрын
I can't believe the cameraman survived that phalanx showdown.
@randomsomeguy15610 ай бұрын
Camera man never dies
@aaronjacobamadorsalazar19343 жыл бұрын
Last clip is a joke
@stevenblack79283 жыл бұрын
Hollywood trash I think
@matthewrichardson87603 жыл бұрын
what do you mean, anyone can just push 10 pikes to the ground and then use them as a ramp to jump over the enemy 3:40
@janefelix38213 жыл бұрын
@@stevenblack7928 Actually BBC PC nonsense, putting today's society into mid 17th Century.
@alessiodecarolis3 жыл бұрын
Alatriste was really a good movie, wish they'd made a serie from these books
@Fred_L.2 жыл бұрын
There is an Alatriste series, released in 2015. IMO not on the same level though.
@wolfgangkranek3763 жыл бұрын
Not every pike formation is a phalanx though. The Spanish fe. fought as a so called Tercio.
@beep15342 жыл бұрын
a Tercio aint the name of the specific formation. I also dont think phalanx is the right term too. Tercio is the given name to the entire army unit consitsing of its pikemen, arquebuseers, musketeers, artillery, cavalry and supplies. Kind of like a Legion so to speak.
@AleksanderK124 жыл бұрын
I love that how in "Cromwell" in last second pikemans start charging and ruin whole battle scene
@marleegould5422 жыл бұрын
When two pike squares met (and that's what they where called, not a phalanx) it was commonly known as "the push of pike". Sometimes the men on both sides would just kinda yell a lot and make it look convincing, then retreat because fuck that shit. 🤣
@bello974011 ай бұрын
"The boss is watching, look busy"
@nowgoawayanddosomethinggoo89782 жыл бұрын
guys with pikes: heh heh stabby stabby from ten feet away! that one guy with a dagger: i'm going to do what's called a progamer move.
@gregorjerman9735 жыл бұрын
The trumpeter had really a good time after all
@dionysus68924 жыл бұрын
Gotta wonder if the drummer boys of opposite sides ever met on the field
@BestMods1683 жыл бұрын
drum duel.
@d.esanchez33513 жыл бұрын
If both were in the right side they probably wont see each other but maybe the one from the company besides them... And what the hell do they did when the pikes clashed? just... stood there praying or what?
@imstuff24993 жыл бұрын
@@d.esanchez3351 probably went deep into their formation for protection,they need the drums to communicate
@jackthunderbolt4307 Жыл бұрын
did the drummer boys live that long?
@PowermadNavigator5 жыл бұрын
That last clip comes in like some sort of joke, where is it from? :o
@rickdelapaz46324 жыл бұрын
dunno its like a trashy film. than the first two.
@MatthewOlney4 жыл бұрын
It's from the Three Musketeers TV show
@mmareviewer.23724 жыл бұрын
totally
@SPARTANSAM14 жыл бұрын
A movie called Altariste
@armchairradical26653 жыл бұрын
psshh what do you mean?? every one knows that the Spanish tercios would instantly break formation the second some dude with a sword charged at them
@xinweiliu6175 жыл бұрын
1:32 It only took one swing with a sword to knock a fully armed cuirassier off the horse. :(
@rouch72194 жыл бұрын
Yes it would. He may not he dead, but he is sure as hell knocked off.
@majorcoat4 жыл бұрын
Got to remember the force behind the sword and the surface area that force is concentrating on... it not kill ,but I would definitely imagine him being laid back in the saddle with slow recovery because of his armor weight or just thrown off the horse completely.
@williemherbert14564 жыл бұрын
@@majorcoat or could be his foot stuck with the stirrup and being dragged by his panicked horse
@aaronjacobamadorsalazar19343 жыл бұрын
Not possible with a sword. If it's a lance hit, it would make more sense
@Brokenlance3 жыл бұрын
Love the people justifying that a swing from a sword can knock down a 200 pound man in 75 pound armor. That is nearly impossible. Not completely impossible but close.
@reesezpeecez083 жыл бұрын
Great video, I am going to have to watch the first two movies now. Thanks.
@erlantzbeltz49045 жыл бұрын
The Spanish rouge was formed under the pikes.
@EzekielDeLaCroix Жыл бұрын
The last video: HE'S JUST SOMEONE WITH A SWORD. HOW ARE WE LOSING TO THIS GUY?
@jackthunderbolt4307 Жыл бұрын
quite a contrast between the first and second. the first is "oh jolly good times lads! look at the pretty uniforms and pretty horses from a safe sanitized distance" while the second is "your in the dirt with us watching guys get stabbed in the balls and being torn open by big bore guns"
@thegrowthparamedic3 жыл бұрын
Look at that, not a phone in sight! Just people living in the moment
@reymartmaquiling58282 жыл бұрын
Call me crazy but I want a 17th century army pitted against zombies. imagine pikemen clashing against hordes of zombies. Isn't that cool?
@based_kaiser90152 жыл бұрын
Same
@blackpowderkun Жыл бұрын
Read a novel with something similar, Zombie/berserker got stab through the torso and push through the psychological effect lead to formation breaking.
@jackthunderbolt4307 Жыл бұрын
i had that same thought
@Joe_Yabuki858 Жыл бұрын
Warhammer Fantasy
@GararValurHallfresson3 жыл бұрын
Not a cellphone in sight. Just people enjoying the moment
@SlovakianBoy25803 жыл бұрын
Well yes, but actually no
@Danielperezguitar2 жыл бұрын
2:14 gotta love the random "son of a bitch" shout (hijo de puta)
@d.a.g.c9614 жыл бұрын
Wtf the last clip
@chikami60143 жыл бұрын
Lol that scene with that man forcing down a handful of pikes with his sword -- yes because soldiers trained with pikes are taught to handle them with soft grips and with no sense of purpose
@erichvondonitz53252 жыл бұрын
pikes are long and heavy, its hard to properly hold them so a wipe can easily dispatch them
@MetalKingII2 жыл бұрын
@@erichvondonitz5325 Maybe in some situations but mostly not and especially not as easily as in that ridiculous scene.
@erichvondonitz53252 жыл бұрын
@@MetalKingII yup, depends on the situation
@jackthunderbolt4307 Жыл бұрын
gotta admit that scene is horseshit
@florentinoramirez22574 жыл бұрын
Los temibles tercios españoles, la fuerza más letal en los campos de batalla europeos durante siglo y medio Saludos desde México.
1:51 No phones, no Tiktards, just people enjoying the moment
@richmondlandersenfells2238 Жыл бұрын
Tiktards😆
@dreadfullguppy193 жыл бұрын
push of pike..a particularly nasty form of warfare
@karontequinto9173 жыл бұрын
I know it does little sense to add this but the modern army of spain still has the eay of marching of the tercios (looks gay af but is the most effient way to march while holding an 11 ft pike) an the tercios are the ones in the 2nd film
@NANNO_FEMBOY3 жыл бұрын
“TALYHOOOO” lmaoo
@lorialorenzo60553 жыл бұрын
Pedro! Vamolos! Bring the Beer! It's BBQ Time, i have the sticks... 😂
@TKDragon754 жыл бұрын
Yeah this was a weird time for warfare. It was like "Okay so no more knights, we got guns now." But also like "Well the guns aren't very good yet, keep only the pikes, but take off everyone's armor." Pike and Shot was really just a transition period, but it kind of started the notion of gentleman's warfare. And I know musketeers were much easier to train than archers, but personally I think archers could have been devastating if they were used more often during this time.
@wulfsragar4 жыл бұрын
it was specificly that, it was more cheaper and easier to outfit a musketeer and training them took way much less then a longbowman, bows takes years to practice if you want to have a good longbowman, and arrows were pretty expensive to make aswell
@aaronjacobamadorsalazar19344 жыл бұрын
@@wulfsragar Archers would be a lot faster than the musketeer though
@wulfsragar4 жыл бұрын
@@aaronjacobamadorsalazar1934 true, but it still takes a hell of alot of training and years of experience to get to that point, training in the use of muskets or arquebus takes waaaaay less time and effort, they choose it this way because of time and money, arrows are really expensive at the time, but i do get your point though ;)
@aaronjacobamadorsalazar19344 жыл бұрын
@@wulfsragar I mean investments won't hurt if it'd work...
@carlostintaya82294 жыл бұрын
an archers reserve behind a line of musketeers would be devastating
@Velkan13964 жыл бұрын
Name of the movie pls?
@aeiou67663 жыл бұрын
Me recuerda a los invictos y honorables tercios
@sandybeach35763 жыл бұрын
Looks like fun
@DD-hu8bp4 ай бұрын
At this point, bro will called every pike formation a phalanx
@bobohow63353 жыл бұрын
The last clip has the worst plot in best quality. Movie industries can't make a qualified film after they developed advanced technique.
@jacobrigby31722 жыл бұрын
did someone shout "Hijo de puta" during the pike clash ?
@Fred_L.2 жыл бұрын
Yep.
@HrafnkelHarthrathi4 жыл бұрын
Not worth watching the last clip.
@Pickle911 Жыл бұрын
Did u know that in the medieval century they basically use pikemens as shield for the musketeer to be defended againts cavalry but the problem is pikemens were slowly fading away so they came up with an idea called plug bayonet it can be attach to the barrel but problem is it often falls from the barrel and also makes the gun not be able to be shot
@pgtv67612 жыл бұрын
1500 old 1600 new Brain logic
@francelewiss70302 жыл бұрын
I can imagine what this war is like if the Samurai was there
@baldwintheleper82902 жыл бұрын
They would be destroyed
@trk1b28varianrhesa42 жыл бұрын
@@baldwintheleper8290 well, they have musketeer too
@soniavallejos3039 Жыл бұрын
Cagayan battle.
@BrandonCRFC3 жыл бұрын
this was educational and refreshing realkistic
@emperorconstantine1.361 Жыл бұрын
So the Morien style helmet WAS common across Europe. I admit, I always thought it was mostly a Spanish thing. Wait, what was that last clip from?
@jackthunderbolt4307 Жыл бұрын
evidently a show called the musketeers.
@carlsoria32155 жыл бұрын
what name of the movies?
@sethleoric25982 жыл бұрын
No phones.. just people living in the moment
@marabo12 Жыл бұрын
the 2nd one please tell me the name of the 2nd one!!!
@DlomedeS3 жыл бұрын
The second scene was the best and more realistic.
@abscbn6599 Жыл бұрын
What movie is this???
@wouldyoulikeabanaenae18483 жыл бұрын
Imagine charging into spears with horses
@janefelix38213 жыл бұрын
Horses would not go straight into spears, that was the reason for standing in formation like that. They knew the horses would ride around so a square of pikes and later bayonets would keep the horses at bay.
@anastasiavelonagoshudnaya74553 жыл бұрын
1500s Warfare in All Countries!!!!
@TRHARTAmericanArtist3 жыл бұрын
This was a good day for Foxes.
@corvusduluth3 жыл бұрын
The Rooks will roost, a murder of Crows, the Foxes bellies full.
@doofkos4 жыл бұрын
Looks like 'pikes and drums' is much more bloody than 'pipes and drums'.
@maciejniedzielski74964 жыл бұрын
Is that formation a Tertio ?
@hannibalburgers4773 жыл бұрын
The part in the middle? Yes, it's tercio. It's from a movie about Rocroi. Edit: Alatriste
@jakobsavsek73513 жыл бұрын
Movie?
@yanmay98243 жыл бұрын
This is at least 2 entirely different conflicts the first is the English civil war ( from the film Cromwell I believe) the second is possibly a Spanish conflict but I am not certain of that.
@karontequinto9173 жыл бұрын
Battle of Rocroi,my friend from the film of alatriste
@familiasotonunez52233 жыл бұрын
The 30 years war between Spain and France for the control of Belgium. France won that war and started the Rococo era of france dominace until Napoleon
@jackthunderbolt4307 Жыл бұрын
to be fair the 30 years war and the english civil war were happening at the same time. both ended in 1648 i think
@vicomtedemousson53243 жыл бұрын
looks fun, just people living in the moment
@badguy14815 жыл бұрын
I always thought pikes were used ONLY to keep opposing troops and cavalry at arms length so that the enemy could be eliminated with men armed with short swords and bows. I didn't think they could fight pike to pike. But I guess they could?
@GorinRedspear5 жыл бұрын
The Italians called it the Bad War. The moment two blocks of pikes are locked in combat, both sides have no other choice but to push forward. Doing so they will sustain terrible casualties, but falling back may result in total destruction. This was starting from the late Middle Ages untill the mid 1600's. After that they were increasingly refraining from locking pikes in such a fashion on the continent. The Dutch and the Swedes had repeatedly beaten larger forces by using superior musketry, and indeed only using pikes as protection for their musketeers. But if needed they could, and did, engage in such a manner of fighting. Also keep in mind that the pike went out of fashion for soldiers when they found out that putting a sharp object on a musket had pretty much the same result. Bayonet charges were the direct successor to pike warfare and in regular use in the First World War.
@fasiapulekaufusi66325 жыл бұрын
The scene you are referring to is the French invasion of Spain.
@badguy14815 жыл бұрын
@@GorinRedspear Interesting. Thanks.
@sergiorivillocarrere26855 жыл бұрын
@@fasiapulekaufusi6632 No, The battle of rocroi was in 1643 in France, the napoleonic invasion of spain was later in 1808 and no-one use the pike then.
@fasiapulekaufusi66325 жыл бұрын
@@sergiorivillocarrere2685 I wasn't referring to Napoleon.
@PossMcLeod3 жыл бұрын
Brutal.
@momentomori5263 Жыл бұрын
Movie name ?
@Ggctvmdpl5 жыл бұрын
Ngeriii
@Uteuschmidth3 жыл бұрын
Reminds me Cossacks European Wars :D
@Fred_L.2 жыл бұрын
It was such an awesome game.
@sanuku5353 жыл бұрын
The clash of pikes. was a mess, a truth.
@G349933 жыл бұрын
Viva España
@WargameRus3 жыл бұрын
Не плохо показали бой.
@chemtrooper13 жыл бұрын
No charge of pike…push of pike.
@doniedoory2.034Ай бұрын
I only need 1 Glock to win that😂
@CryseTech3 жыл бұрын
Looks like a game of Cossaks ^^
@MajesticOak2 жыл бұрын
Holy shit another Cossacks player!
@CryseTech2 жыл бұрын
@@MajesticOak Hello Mate!
@MajesticOak2 жыл бұрын
@@CryseTech Which is your favorite in the series? Currently I mostly play Cossacks 3 (mainly because of the quality of life features and that it's in 3D) but I really wish for a remaster of American Conquest (I don't care if they lie and label it as American Conquest 2 much like Cossacks 3 is basically an unfinished remaster of Cossacks 1).
@charlotteliddell75803 жыл бұрын
I'm no expert in warfare but the last one don't work that way right?
@DJLR10663 жыл бұрын
You're right, the most accurate is the second vid
@deadby153 жыл бұрын
In this situation Molotov Cocktails would be effective. Were they used?
@janefelix38213 жыл бұрын
They stared using grenades around this time, basically thin wooden balls stuffed with gunpowder with a short fuse.
@mr787takium95 жыл бұрын
Wow last video was totally suck
@filidorable3 жыл бұрын
In Cromwell the movie, when it comes to push of pike in the battle scenes, all the pikemen instantly drop their pikes and draw their 'hangers'! It is quite jarring to see but quite understandable just the same: the Spanish Army extras of 1970 were obviously not trained to use pikes! I do enjoy the movie - for it's 'feel' rather than it's historical accuracy.
@hunterkiller2321343 жыл бұрын
Presumably you would train the extras to use pikes, then. That's exactly what movie productions do nowadays.
@hunterkiller2321343 жыл бұрын
Presumably you would train the extras to use pikes, then. That's exactly what movie productions do nowadays.
@filidorable3 жыл бұрын
@@hunterkiller232134 Health & safety would be a major issue as well. For example, The Sealed Knot and ECW Society DO train their reanactors pike drill, but also ensure that pike heads are rubberised and that the pikes themselves are held almost vertically on contact with the 'enemy'. Thus combat between pike blocks simply evolve into shoving matches. All to do with safety. It must have been nightmarish to be involved in a pike-to-pike struggle IRL!
@realThomastheCat4 жыл бұрын
Was there a strategic reason as to why you'd charge your cavalry at a pike wall?
@KarlPHorse4 жыл бұрын
You wouldn't.
@armchairradical26653 жыл бұрын
only if you wanted to become a horse kabob
@armchairradical26653 жыл бұрын
you would really only charge the cavalry against musketeers or skirmishers, never pikemen unless they were retreating or broke formation
@gaolmiralis22473 жыл бұрын
@@armchairradical2665 Not really... The French did it quite succesfully at the Battle of Ceresole (it was on the flank though). They also did it during the battle of Marignano, quite effectively. The famous Chevalier de Bayard had to cut his way through the Swiss Phalanx to rescue the Duke of Lorraine. If the pikemen were a perfect anti-cavalry unit, he would've died like the Prince of Tallemont did during that same battle. Thing is, during the early 16th century, firearms weren't some god-tier weapon, they did the job but were inaccurate and misfired more often than not, and cavalry was still clad in full armor (which could make a bullet bounce off). Pikes were effective, but if you take a look at the horse armors of that time, you'll notice that it has some really good angles which could easily make a pike glance off. Knights generally didn't charge pike formations because there was a high chance that they would come off worse, but it happened when the planets aligned, and it could grant some great results. But in the mid to late 16th century, with the evolution of firearms, infantry drills, pikes and all that, God forbid you charge that pike square, you'll look like Swiss cheese in no time.
@armchairradical26653 жыл бұрын
@@gaolmiralis2247 I agree the pike square and other formations were far from perfect and subject to exceptions, like you mentioned. However, these pike formations were probably the most effective tactic against the cavalry. No horse was going to charge into a wall of sharp points, no matter how hard you willed it. But part of the problem with the pikemen, which made them not very effective during the late medieval period, was that they weren't very useful unless they could hold formation. Like you said these formations required extensive drilling and a professional army. The swiss and the Spanish demonstrated the effectiveness of a professional army, during the 16th century and early 17th century. In regards to firearms, they were not really used as the primary attacking force until the mid-part of the 17th century. More often than not firearms were used to disrupt the enemy and open holes in the opponent's formations for the cavalry or pikemen to exploit. Gustavus Adolphus demonstrated how devastating cavalry armed with swords could be. However, by the time formations became mainstream it had become generally accepted that gunpowder weapons were the future. Not really disagreeing, but just affirming that by the 30 years war pikemen were necessary against cavalry.
@cakomiguel44425 жыл бұрын
Bom
@Wolfen4433 жыл бұрын
This is insane, Phalanx warfare in the age of guns, sorry warfare is just mad in this time period.
@Fred_L.2 жыл бұрын
Reliable guns in warfare were still comparably new during the wars depicted; in those their use was developed and increased considerably.
@JoseAlvarez-dp8fz3 жыл бұрын
Viva los Tercios Españoles. Dominating the world for centuries!
@Lassisvulgaris3 жыл бұрын
But then came the battle of Breitenfeld.....
@JoseAlvarez-dp8fz3 жыл бұрын
Thats right!An astonishing win for the protestans!it was round about 1630 But Spain dominates the world for about 300 years. And after that defeat for another 150 years.The Tercios were undeafetable during a long period of time!
@Lassisvulgaris3 жыл бұрын
@@JoseAlvarez-dp8fz That's true. Though the term "protestants" should be exchanged with the term "Lutherans", as the Swedes were Lutheran. The Thirty Year War, started out as Catholicas against Protestants, but later it was rather mixed.... As far as I know, La Legion still uses the term "Tercio" for their units, which is a suitable connection to former traditions. "Nadie en el tercio sabia, quien era aquel legionaro".... Gunpowder changed warfare, and the Swedes developed light artillery, which made it more versatile, and more effective against packed units. I actually liked the movie "Alatriste", as it depicted the tercios in a fairly accurate way.
@aeiou67662 жыл бұрын
@@Lassisvulgaris And the....NORDLINGEN
@nicholasmarin78556 ай бұрын
Find me pike and shot warfare movies
@thumperpaul1553 жыл бұрын
Wouldnt it work better if the ranks behind the pikemen had spears to throw or something?
@BanditoBurrito3 жыл бұрын
I see it as the front line are expected to die in a prolonged battle. So everyone should have pikes to reinforce the lost position. Plus it’s expensive to give secondary weapons to everyone when you could just make another unit of pike
@hunterkiller2321343 жыл бұрын
The ranks further back would hold their pikes forward so that the enemy cannot effectively get around the pikemen in front. This is painting a broad brush across history but often there would be some type of ranged component near a pike formation to provide support. Typically musketeers who would retreat behind the pikes when threatened, and longbows or archers to support.
@janefelix38213 жыл бұрын
Spears where obsolete by this time. That is what the musketeer's role was, to fire bullets into the opposition. There was a formula to determine the ratio of pike men to musketeers.
@JayJet539 ай бұрын
Sorry for late reply but some of the musketeers or pistoleers stand behind the first or second rank of pike to shoot while the pikes are in melee
@TheMrcassina Жыл бұрын
Napoleon was a great cavalry commander, he started his career as a cavalry man to become the president of the united states of America
@yoye1015 жыл бұрын
the last clip is horrible
@hannibalburgers4773 жыл бұрын
Pikemen immediately break formation and pulled their pikes up? Did they learn fighting from M2:TW, lmao
@KroM2343 жыл бұрын
The famous Black Guy who charged and broke the Tercios at Rocroi...
@joeyop17roblox282 жыл бұрын
They had matchlocks :/
@boonamai89262 жыл бұрын
How stupid they charged into the pikes in the beginning xD
@riaharman54603 жыл бұрын
This is from cromwell 1970.
@feereel4 жыл бұрын
cromwell ??
@janefelix38213 жыл бұрын
Yes, for #1.
@user-qz7cw7lz9b3 жыл бұрын
이때부터 총기와 대포를 사용하기 시작햇군용 군복도 슬슬 착용하네요
@kékédesplages-d6d4 жыл бұрын
Mine is longer than yours...
@kahetel133 жыл бұрын
Why O why- is it every army always underestimated pikes> They musst be British
@doctortabasco3 жыл бұрын
WTF is going on? are they all ok?
@egoamigo-13773 жыл бұрын
Na they died. Blown to pieces or stabbed to death..
@UnionAndroidSRboi3 жыл бұрын
Sarisssa was advanced to 15th century then
@roseblack60894 жыл бұрын
长枪刺杀太惨了。
@icebobk67023 жыл бұрын
are they flintlocks? or what?
@janefelix38213 жыл бұрын
The muskets were matchlocks and the pistols were wheellocks. While flintlocks starting appearing around 1610, they were not that reliable and hard to mass produce. It would not be until the 1660s, around 20 years after the first two movies shown take place that they would show up in European arsenals and not until 1700 or so where they would be the mainstay firing mechanism, completely taking over by 1720.
@icebobk67023 жыл бұрын
@@janefelix3821 interesting. Do u know what movie this is? And are there more movies like this?
@janefelix38213 жыл бұрын
@@icebobk6702 The versions of Cyrano De Bergerac have scenes like this as the novel takes place during the Franco-Spanish War 1635-1648. The movies are Cromwell 1970; Allatriste 2006, and the BBC TV show Musketeers 2014-16, though that show was modern PC set in the 1630s and 1640s. Th