Worst pike line I've ever seen. Whats the point of having a pike line if your not going to stand there and cooperatively skewer the enemy as he attacks you.
@DefeatedRoyalist4 жыл бұрын
J Dee these guys aren’t soldiers either. I believe ol John Smith was the only Soldier on the expedition. The Iroquois were also a very successful Native Empire so it makes sense they would put up a good fight against the starving and poorly trained colonists.
@LuxInvicta4 жыл бұрын
A lot of these people were simple farmers and tradesmen. They were not even trained as a militia until they realized the natives were attacking. It was dumb even having them outside the walls, though.
@ShortHandedNow4 жыл бұрын
@@LuxInvicta Regardless... That was the loosest pike line I have ever seen. They would have fought from behind the walls when possible.
@KJ-is5ug4 жыл бұрын
They broke the line because natives threw some spears at them, should’ve just pike charge them.
@pericodelospalotes57384 жыл бұрын
@@DefeatedRoyalist John Smith carrying the Burgundy flag 1:08? ha ha ha en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Empire
@Khobotov3 жыл бұрын
I hate when they do that: Forming a battle formation, but then when they meet the enemy everyone splits up for the 0815 hollywood chaos dance scene.
@IEE-ic5fo3 жыл бұрын
otherwise the movie will be much less heroic ;-)
@jimbob4653 жыл бұрын
They don't make movies that show reality they make movies that show what the people wanna watch... Natives fucking up white people...
@sirwhitemeat97853 жыл бұрын
@@jimbob465 give me one reason why people wouldn't want to watch formation of pikes plow through naked natives?
@catholicracialist7763 жыл бұрын
@@jimbob465 "White people" Go to a doctor and fix your brain or get a new brain. Your choice
@charlesmaximus91613 жыл бұрын
@@catholicracialist776 he might have been being sarcastic with his comment, basically pointing out that Hollywood films and period pieces deliberately vilify us.
@azb37284 жыл бұрын
Why go to all the effort of building a fort if you then do nothing about the five foot high grass that completely surrounds the fort and provides the perfect cover for an advancing enemy? And then why would you go and stand outside your walls in the middle of that perfectly high grass so you totally negate your ranged weapons? Piss poor film
@azb37284 жыл бұрын
Brum Kid Sure, they conquered tens of millions of people, destroyed entire Empires, held colonies for centuries and discovered entire continents but yeah, you think Spaniards are dumb rather than the director chose to take liberties with reality because it made for a better visual story.
@MauriceTarantulas4 жыл бұрын
@@azb3728 Yep!
@alonsocushing23984 жыл бұрын
@@BrumKid History's obviously not your strong point buffoon.
@BrumKid4 жыл бұрын
I see three morons who dont get a joke and yes i know my history question is do you because if you are millenniums then your little world only started about 30 years ago.
@el_chief_dannyboy4 жыл бұрын
Brum Kid These aren’t Spaniards their Englishmen my dude
@americohagim11314 жыл бұрын
Who else is having Empire Total war flashbacks?
@ianhovenden50684 жыл бұрын
Americo Hagim facts 🤣
@milovantolic88214 жыл бұрын
Yea... Good old days. I really liked to massacre those imperial troops with my Sioux terror savages.
@milovantolic88214 жыл бұрын
@DANIEL BIN OMAR - If you are asking me. Then no. But anyway I look forward to checking out.
@americohagim11314 жыл бұрын
DANIEL BIN OMAR -, I don’t know.
@paradiseisland694 жыл бұрын
Mir like media AL total war in America like aztektz VS europeans
@johnratican38243 жыл бұрын
If Europeans were really that terrible at military strategy, I would be typing in Algonquin and not in English.
@svt802213 жыл бұрын
small scale vs. large scale. a few dozen men fighting is different than a few thousand. a garden in your backyard is worked differently than a 1,000 acre farm.
@milin71202 жыл бұрын
Diseases
@xniper27249 ай бұрын
They had to make europeans with awful strategy bc they're the "evil white people" who should lose in the director's eyes
@el_chico13139 ай бұрын
probably u would br writing in spanish or dutch or probably in french
@centurion79939 ай бұрын
@@svt80221the thing is Hollywood just sucks at warfare, they always have, the colonists knew they would lose in the open so they forced the natives to fight them in sieges where numbers mattered less and their guns and armor were of more use, but that would have made too much sense so they just made the Europeans as bad at war as they could, though the colonists didn’t have the best war skill early on due to lack of arms and knowledge of their use since they weren’t allowed to own them back in Europe, so they took a bit before they got off the ground and stated winning
@karl_fookin_tanner96054 жыл бұрын
Roman legionaries would have been damn effective against these native warriors
@plinh64734 жыл бұрын
Imagine when they tried to get through the testudo
@gj12345678999994 жыл бұрын
Imagine if Roman Legionnaires met their 15th century descendants Spanish Conquistadors armed with muskets and cannon. They would get smashed. Now think that Natives at the time of the first contact had less technology than the romans did. Of course they lost. But think how well they did and adapt. After a few years they learned firearms and many tribes like the Iroquois, Comanche, and Sioux defeated Euro-American armies in many battles. Not bad for a people that had only tech lower than romans only 150-200 years earlier. Another way to look at it is it took Europeans 200 years to conquer a continent that had low tech and was depopulated.
@htoodoh57704 жыл бұрын
@Vindexproeliator The Spanish had some native help.
@gj12345678999994 жыл бұрын
Vindexproeliator this isn’t true. Central Mexico was conquered quickly (with the help of thousands of Tlaxcallan allies to fight the Aztecs)but the Yucatán took 150 years to be pacified. Also the Comanches and the apaches kept the southwest from becoming very settled due to constant raiding. Basically in places you had an Indian kingdom with a strong central government, the Spanish conquered it easily once they defeated the king. However in decentralized areas with difficult terrain, the Spanish had a very hard time.
@jamborginiii17324 жыл бұрын
Im your BABUSHKA wrong the romans would get destroyed by the natives
@danielplainview236010 ай бұрын
Not a cellphone in sight. Everyone just enjoying the moment.
@PhilipJames-i2qАй бұрын
Thanks I needed to laugh , have a good one
@pamkoh99994 жыл бұрын
The title of the movie is "The Worst Commander"
@tristanceld82083 жыл бұрын
So underrated :D
@BabySonicGT3 жыл бұрын
Lol
@SStupendous3 жыл бұрын
Makes sense
@lervish19664 ай бұрын
Crap Film
@icetea14554 жыл бұрын
I dont understand why do they have to go outside the gate and fight they could always use the gate as a choke point with muskets and cannons at the back that wouldve save lives..
@mynamejeff7854 жыл бұрын
Because its a propaganda movie
@BrumKid4 жыл бұрын
An American film showing how dumb the Spaniards are and that the Americans are better even before they became Americans, there is no better arrogance then American arrogance which will be their down fall in the end.
@zyklonb97453 жыл бұрын
Hollyjew production
@moustique1102043 жыл бұрын
Game Of thrones move =P
@MyChocow3 жыл бұрын
Do you see how those native just hopes over those fences
@TomekHKaput4 жыл бұрын
Wood Elves sacking an Empire's settlement
@batanggalinggubat62544 жыл бұрын
Warhammer?
@lobosolitario91934 жыл бұрын
HAHAHAHAHAHA
@ProphetChuck84714 жыл бұрын
@Its Extra Hard By Sigmar, yes.
@boozycruze76794 жыл бұрын
No no no no. Native Americans attacking English settlement
@taserrr4 жыл бұрын
SUMMON THE ELECTOR COUNTS
@franciscozamora41564 жыл бұрын
They were better off staying within the safety of the forts walls. A pike and shot formation was the model for most European militaries. Unfortunately none of the Jamestown colonists were professional soldiers, which in this case made the pike and shot formation useless.
@joelbilly1355 Жыл бұрын
That would probably explain why they were decimated so easily.
@alexanderchenf110 ай бұрын
They had neither the discipline nor the number
@charlesmaximus91613 жыл бұрын
That scene at 0:22 is actually strikingly similar to the fight that New England colonists had with the Wampanoag as they pulled out of the beach in Pocasset Country during the summer of 1675. Captain Benjamin Church relays this incident in his diary of King Philip's War. You can also read about it in the epic historical account, "Flintlock and Tomahawk" by Douglas Edward Leach. The 17th century wars in the English-American colonies were so brutal but so fascinating.
@georgewashington339310 ай бұрын
Read "mayflower" great book.
@TheRealForgetfulElephant9 ай бұрын
Ye it always cracks me up one of the reasons they fought was because the natives (in NH specifically) didn’t understand the concept of private ownership so they would take pigs from farms and that caused the settlers to take up arms. 😂
@karlgreenkgv9 ай бұрын
But these are spanish soldiers of Tercios, see the helmets, the formation and the flag of cross of Borgoña based in the cross of San Andres. It was the flag of the spanish troops
@centurion79939 ай бұрын
@@TheRealForgetfulElephantwell when someone takes a month’s worth of food that was worth like five thousand dollars(in modern money) I would reckon that you would understand why they were upset, especially if you can’t just go get more from a grocery store
@СергейВампир-л6в9 ай бұрын
В 1948-1951 годах Израиль принял более 800-900 тыс. евреев-выходцев из арабо-исламских стран, многие из которых (особенно евреи - бывшие жители Ирака и стран Магриба) вынуждены были оставить свои страны, бросив имущество, перед лицом нарастающей в этих странах волны антисемитизма. Как заметила британский еврейский журналист и один из организаторов Ассоциации евреев-выходцев из стран Ближнего Востока и Северной Африки в Великобритании "Хариф", Лин Джулиус, сегодня в арабских странах проживают не более 4000 евреев. Это все, что осталось из многих сотен тысяч, которые в середине прошлого века еще проживали на территории современных арабских и иных мусульманских стран, где они оказались после падения Иудейского царства 2500 лет назад, то есть, примерно 1300 лет до прихода туда самих арабов. И еврейский исход с этих земель 40-е - 50-х гг. прошлого века, который стал крупнейшим потоком немусульман в регионе Ближнего Востока до массового изгнания иракских христиан во время "арабской весны", заметно превосходил число лиц, которые хоть как-то могли претендовать на статус мигрантов из бывшей британской Палестины. Таким образом, в известном смысле между Израилем и арабскими странами произошел своего рода "обмен населением", что было широко распространенным в первой половине ХХ века способом разрешения этнополитических и этно-религиозных противоречий. (Другие примеры такого же рода - обмен населением между Грецией и Турцией после Первой мировой войны, и Индией и Пакистаном в 40-50-е гг. ХХ века). Причем, в отличие от палестинских арабов в большинстве арабских стран, в Израиле евреям-выходцам из арабских стран было предоставлено полное гражданство - равно как и арабам, оказавшимся на его территории после окончании Войны за независимость (и уже на выборах в 1-ый Кнессет в 1949 г. участвовали арабские партии). Потому, хотя Израиль, как современное либеральное и цивилизованное государство, совместно со всеми арабскими странами готов взять на себя определенную гуманитарную роль в устройстве потомков "палестинских беженцев" там, где они проживают, или же в переселении их в те страны, которые пожелают их принять, с его точки зрения проблема беженцев закрыта. Заметим, однако, что в отличие от двух первых аргументов - что Израиль не является ответственным за проблему, которая возникла из-за агрессии арабов, стремившихся уничтожить еврейское государство, и не несет ответственности за то, что эта проблема законсервирована - этот третий аргумент долгие годы в Израиле звучал минорно. Важнее, было то, что на подобную схему были ни при каких условиях не согласны сами палестинские арабские лидеры, для которых принятие концепции "обмена населением" означает закрытие темы "палестинских беженцев", подрывающее ключевое звено "палестинской идентичности", а с ним их претензии на власть и ресурсы. С другой стороны, теоретически можно себе представить, что тема признания арабскими странами ответственности за исход евреев и присвоение их собственности, которая сильно усложняет их находящимся в капкане своей многолетней пропалестинской риторики лидерам задачу "продавить", на уровне местного общественного мнения, идею сближения с Израилем, парадоксально может стать и решением данной проблемы. Если дело будет представлено таким образом, что Израиль готов "поучаствовать в расходах", то есть, снять требование о передачи стоимости оставленного евреями имущества в обмен на экономическое устройство палестинских арабов и снятие "палестинской проблемы" с региональной и мировой повестки дня. Разумеется, здесь имеется и моральная проблема, причем уже на еврейском поле. Собственность огромной массы погибших в Катастрофе европейских евреев невозможно вернуть наследникам за неимением таковых, и эти финансовые или материальные ресурсы, в случае реституции передаются на нужды местных еврейских общин или Израиля, для распределения среди переживших Холокост и пострадавших от нацизма. В отличие от них, на конфискованную в арабо-мусульманских странах еврейскую собственность имеются или могут быть вполне конкретные претенденты - чьи права на нее могут быть документально намного более обоснованы, чем большинство аналогичных заявок арабов, на, якобы, принадлежавшие им дома в Хайфе или Цфате. Евреи арабских стран "не ждут компенсации за утерянное там имущество, но рассчитывают на извинения и признание вины за причиненные им страдания". А уже в рамках этих пониманий, Израиль и еврейский мир, судя по всему, сможет найти способ учесть и материальные претензии конкретных еврейских семей. Не исключено, что моральные и материальные права евреев арабских стран могут стать таким объединяющим еврейский мир фактором на нынешнем этапе..
@Jake-dh9qk4 жыл бұрын
3:26 me trying to fix my college issues
@ianhovenden50684 жыл бұрын
Jake4595 😂😂😂
@intotheunknown214 жыл бұрын
LOL.
@VladislavDrac3 жыл бұрын
Thank God we still survived that hell of a phase in our lives
@memecliparchives22543 жыл бұрын
@@VladislavDrac I'm in that phase of my life now.
@VladislavDrac3 жыл бұрын
@@memecliparchives2254 well, don't take shit seriously and good luck to you
@robplazzman60494 жыл бұрын
Exploding cannonballs came about some 150/200 years later I think.
@AggelosKyriou4 жыл бұрын
Shrapnel were a thing since the middle of the 16th century. But they weren't shot out of cannons but out of mortars.
@nikitab.66004 жыл бұрын
@@AggelosKyriou you mean explosive shot? Shrapnell was invented in the 1800s.
@Psalm144.14 жыл бұрын
They had shotguns during this time (blunderbuss)...the concept of stuffing a lot of musket balls, ie. shrapnel, or making a giant shotgun was well know and understood then. Kind of like inventing the fork from the idea of a pitch fork. "Canister" shot was used.
@N1ghtH4wk864 жыл бұрын
mongols used grenades
@presidentlouis-napoleonbon88893 жыл бұрын
@@AggelosKyriou What?!? Shrapnel shells were named after Henry Shrapnel who was a British officer in the Napoleonic Wars XD
@conorharris24513 жыл бұрын
It’s important to wait until night to use the flaming arrows. Because they’ll look cooler
@Korradoar3 жыл бұрын
the light from the fires they create will cause the enemy to be blind at night while they try to put it out. so yeah, it is more important to use flaming arrows afterdark. lol. its not like they can' jump up and stop them...
@matthewaleman44012 жыл бұрын
@@Korradoar flaming arrows are literally not physically possible think about what happens when you light an arrow on fire and shoot it the wind immediately extinguishes the flame
@Korradoar2 жыл бұрын
@@matthewaleman4401 aaand thats why you would have stayed home. don't need no 'i can't make my flaming arrows burn right' naysayer in my siege. thumbs down.
@matthewaleman44012 жыл бұрын
@@Korradoar your silly you talk about being all tactical with something that has never been used and defies reality and I wouldn’t have stayed home bro I’d meet you on the battlefield sword in hand
@Korradoar2 жыл бұрын
@@matthewaleman4401 uh.. ..flaming arrows were used... .. a lot... ..wtf?...
@TaterChip914 жыл бұрын
Did they seriously just have every soldier in that company fire at 1 man? I mean god damn, save something for the 2nd volley lol
@Fatelovesirony9603 жыл бұрын
Who lived to tell the story?
@Korradoar3 жыл бұрын
@@Fatelovesirony960 they probably found them and tried to play the defeat off as a 'savage' attack.
@tomwang55643 ай бұрын
and what happened to their bayonets?
@aaronlimeuchin73524 жыл бұрын
Wow, that is some excellent strategy by a group that had better weaponary and a fort better than the natives. Should had box behind the fort and attack between the wall.
@mashek3314 жыл бұрын
@andrew T They're English at Jamestown. It was from the film The New World.
@scootch42244 жыл бұрын
@andrew T That's not very true. The Spaniards were armed with steel armor and had melee and firearms training. The natives just outnumbered them and the Spaniards were pretty chill with the natives for a while until Christopher Columbus was ordered by his king to expand land for resources and for more settlers to come in. If you put one native against on Spanish Conquistador, there's no doubt the Conquistador would be victorious. Then again, if the Spaniard has no rifle and only an arming sword or polearm, it might be a bit more difficult. Besides most tribes were completely unique to each other. You can't just compare the entirety of the Spaniards to the entirety of the Natives. That's ignorant and stupid.
@mashek3314 жыл бұрын
@andrew T It was a pretty common theme among Western European armies at the time - the whole "shot and pike" formation wasn't unique to Spain. Rather they perfected it with the tercio.
@scootch42244 жыл бұрын
@andrew T I completely agree. When not comparing numbers, the Spaniard is superior in combat. What I also want to note about there colonization is there immense trading and how they exchanged their knowledge with different tribes that were more peaceful than others.
@MajorCoolD4 жыл бұрын
Not only that, their Pike formation was more than attrocious... only 2 lines and thinly dispersed like that? Any determined attacker could have broken that... Anyone with a blade and a musket dispersed along the sides of the pike block (at least 3 ranks deep, preferably 5), anyone who had a musket but no proper sidearm/close combat weapon would have been better off on the ramparts on the fort, allowing them to shoot over the heads of their companions in the pikeblock. Of course ultimately it comes down to what numbers and people they had available, but all in all... not too suprising that this whole thing devolved into a wild skirmish of one on one fights. Then again, seeing how this is a Movie... I rarely have seen proper Formations being decently portrayed in movies.
@neolinguista4 жыл бұрын
One thing is certain: Crazy horse had humongous balls...
@SStupendous3 жыл бұрын
Crazy horse, the 1850's-80's Warrior-Chief?
@colin86969084 жыл бұрын
The fact that this film has fire arrows in it should tell you a lot about the historical accuracy.
@Daylon914 жыл бұрын
You realize fire arrows existed in EVERY culture and was used by all those cultures lmfao just because Lindy Beige says something u follow him like a little sheep without doing some research of your own
@@colin8696908 lmao how is truth trolling lmao you aren't very bright are ya? You just spew out garbage you've heard before not even checking your sources
@Philmoscowitz7 ай бұрын
Yeah, because Native Americans didn't know about fire. Lol!!!
@colin86969087 ай бұрын
@@Philmoscowitz Fire arrows aren't real. search for Lindybeige's video on it. Should be about 7 years old now.
@ravagesoyjoy4 жыл бұрын
Attacking foreign refugees? How racist...
@trevorvallo58414 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂 isnt that still the case today? But instead of weapons, it's just racial statements?
@Ymirson9994 жыл бұрын
Indeed... think of all that much needed diversity the Native Americans are denying themselves...
@KJ-is5ug4 жыл бұрын
That’s what happen when the natives forgot to improve their technology, their tech isn’t even near ancient Egyptians lol
@KJ-is5ug4 жыл бұрын
Why waste land if your not going to make a civilisation, might as well get colonised.
@jr37534 жыл бұрын
@@KJ-is5ug 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
@danielblom3913 жыл бұрын
Always like how movies go for these nice formations at the start of the battle that don't really work and then as soon as fighting starts the entire formation runs into a field and starts spinning like a ninjago toy. Like if you're gonna have a pikewall, at least make it dense enough and stay in the friggin pikewall, don't run at the enemy.
@freakyold4 жыл бұрын
A Terrence Malick movie like The New World is two hours of watching grass grow while listening to the characters' thoughts and 15 minutes of "They're coming over the walls...HOLD!"
@David-bl6yg3 жыл бұрын
sounds like typical Terrence Malick to me lol
@spookyname24194 жыл бұрын
Imagine the natives encountering an ancient greek phalanx. I know they would probably just flank it instantly since they are highly mobile, but it's cool to think about a more melee focused unit from European history encountering the natives, and what the natives would have thought of it.
@bancitroggo81044 жыл бұрын
Well the phalanx wouldn't fall apart as easly as this, mostly because the would have light infantry/skirmishers of their own to prevent the flanking. Even if they don't have them, they probably would have use some other strategy or formation.
@rayzas48854 жыл бұрын
Light infantry and Calvary would fuck em
@AtlanteanTrapStar4 жыл бұрын
Sorry but the natives would still get their asses beat
@K.D.A_244 жыл бұрын
In a man to man combat greeks are quite deadly The natives are only able to win against the Spaniards due to unconventional tactics which easily breaks the tercio formation. Also pikemen are vulnerable to arrows (total war reference) Phalanx formation includes shield and I think the greeks are smart enough to quickly intercept flanking units
@josiahgodwin29334 жыл бұрын
With a blonde Colin ferill on a magnificent fresian shouting "don't you want to live forever." Oh yes and add some angular elephants!!!
@starlessaeon39724 жыл бұрын
What kind of fire shit did I just stumble upon
@talisdorman.97963 жыл бұрын
Apparently natives can beat pale people that was a millennia and a half advanced in all aspects.
@frauleinhohenzollernАй бұрын
Anti white propaganda
@a_l75153 жыл бұрын
1:51 when I’m late for class and students are in the way
@gendoposepirata46743 жыл бұрын
Actually he makes a Pentakill
@benjamintan99964 жыл бұрын
would be nice if shotgun bombom would list the name of the movie in the description title
@icetea14554 жыл бұрын
I'ts the adventures of Juan
@m.noorseptian81734 жыл бұрын
''The New World" you are welcome
@dragancevap79124 жыл бұрын
Novi Svet..The New World movie.
@oliverludwig61484 жыл бұрын
@@m.noorseptian8173 Yes, but it's for every clip. It wouldn't be really a big thing to do.
@alexadams79984 жыл бұрын
After seeing that clip why would you want to see the film
@thatguyinelnorte4 жыл бұрын
The film is totally "woke." This version of Pocahantas won't help anyone get elected. The Fetterman Massacre (and the later Custer Massacre) is in fact what caused hatred that led to the massacre at Wounded Knee... Hard for uneducated immigrants (mostly Irish and Italian) to feel a shared humanity with people who mutilate the dead bodies of your comrades... However, there was some confusion between trapdoor Springfields and muzzle-loading weapons among the soldiers. The bits of marching with flags and then the entire line of troops firing at a single rider was unrealistic even for Fetterman. Whose troops were just there to try to protect lumberjacks... You can read about these events. And even Wikipedia is more accurate than that film.
@ActionableFreedom4 жыл бұрын
There will come a day when truth is told. Make the natives in your country truly equal and then let them wallow equally in their sin as you did in yours. Europe wasn't worse, it was just better at killing. With some exceptions. Just like in South Africa, the peaceful tribes had already fallen to the warriors of Zululand, in West Africa the first slaves were blacks sold by black merchants, the more peaceful mercantile civilizations of Mesoamerica were used as slaves and offerings to the gods by the brutal and savage Aztecs. This is why we had allies where ever we went in colonization. Many didn't see us as worse than those already there.
@deckflip4 жыл бұрын
Warriors at least went against armed soldiers that occupied their land....soldiers went after unarmed women and children they deemed expendable.
@berrymarshal004 жыл бұрын
The point is all they do is genocide.. Until today they still do it..
@berrymarshal004 жыл бұрын
@@ActionableFreedom yeah ur ar worse of the worse.. U ar virus to the peace earth.. Hell is your belong... U r call ur self an American.. U Just invader with so many excuse..
@pinchevulpes4 жыл бұрын
Finally an educated comment
@Greyzonecompliant3 жыл бұрын
And influenza and typhus did most of out fighting.
@Sajangrg693 жыл бұрын
Yerp white people's biggest weapon (which they weren't aware of) was diseases they brought from the old world. Whilst Eurasian continent was immune to them, Native Americans hadn't come into contact with these diseases until Europeans arrival.
@pxixmxpdaddy82384 жыл бұрын
Ik the movie does not represent it to well but imagine going against a superior force of men you’ve never seen before and look completely different than you and have extremely better weapons and strategies built up from centuries of wars
@BostonBruinsOWN2 жыл бұрын
What movie is it? Lol
@Ninja562722 жыл бұрын
@@BostonBruinsOWN somethingg
@JohnDoe-sw1rs2 жыл бұрын
European strategies were pretty terrible compared to native hit and run tactics. The technology was better, but not by much, a skilled bowman was just as or more deadly than your average musketeer. Europeans won because of disease and overwhelming numbers, a musketeer only takes a small amount of time to train while a bowman takes a whole lifetime. Europeans also enjoyed having a massive manpower pool while the native Americans in North America went from 60 million to 6 million in around a century due to old world diseases.
@boostjunkie2320 Жыл бұрын
@@JohnDoe-sw1rs they bc it was guns vs sticks. armies vs un organized bands of hunters
@banger2998 Жыл бұрын
@@JohnDoe-sw1rs that is complete nonsense european battle strategies were completely superior in every way. Same with weapons a musket is a far superior weapon. The only times they did lose they were completely outnumbered. This hollywood movie shows a pike phanlax breaking shape the second they have contact that would never happen. It also shows steel armor completely useless which in reality would have stopped many of the attacks dead.
@fredlandry61703 жыл бұрын
Isn’t it strange they were both human but from two different worlds.
@kevinjames13083 жыл бұрын
We have that problem now
@eskaban_edits_beats_and_more2 жыл бұрын
@@kevinjames1308 we do?
@hobomike6935 Жыл бұрын
@@eskaban_edits_beats_and_more yes
@neggaballs3840 Жыл бұрын
@@hobomike6935 What problem exacly?
@i.s.6165 Жыл бұрын
@@neggaballs3840 the fact we can't/refuse to leave the people who clearly want nothing to do with the type of society we're live in alone.
@Spindacre4 жыл бұрын
Those natives need to be a little more tolerant of diversity. >:(
@AggelosKyriou4 жыл бұрын
They already knew that ORANGE MAN BAD
@thepreacher73994 жыл бұрын
@@AggelosKyriou *BUT RED MAN BAD BAD*
@SusCalvin3 жыл бұрын
That's just how things go. The french settlement next doors don't like your silly colony so they and their allied tribes pick a fight. Or it's the other way around, their tribal allies have a fight with your tribal allies and it's only fair you help your ally tribe out.
@bvbxiong57913 жыл бұрын
It's ironic that the gun made europeans vulnerable in combat. If they had a few dozen full plate knights, the natives would have had no chance.
@heldercosta5154 жыл бұрын
In Europe you had the english fighting the french, the portuguese fighting the spanish, the spanish fighting the dutch...can you imagine the breath of fresh air when they got to the America's..."WTF, are these guys for real???"
@KingScorpio844 жыл бұрын
nah you had kingdoms that where in war against each other for the sake of tax payers money
@jorgeguanche53274 жыл бұрын
Portuguese fighting the spanish.....MEEEEEK...WRONG..
@heldercosta5154 жыл бұрын
@@jorgeguanche5327 I don't know if you are spanish or not, I know spanish people like to call themselves a lot of names, castileans, leonese...whatever, as a portuguese they're all spanish to me, and therefore you can find bellow a shortlist of portuguese vs spanish conflicts during the three centuries that comprised the beginning of the Iberian expansion: 1° Fernandine War 1369-70 2° Fernandine War 1372-73 3° Fernandine War 1382-83 Battle of Atoleiros 1384 Battle of Trancoso 1385 Battle of Aljubarrota 1385 Battle of Valverde 1385 Battle of Toro 1476 Battle of Guinea 1478 Battle of Alcântara 1580 Battle of Salga 1581 Battle of Baia das Mós 1581 Battle of Montijo 1644 Battle of Linhas de Elvas 1659 Battle of Montes Claros 1665 So...MEEEEEK...yes they fought against eachother...a lot!
@jorgeguanche53274 жыл бұрын
@@heldercosta515 when Portugal becomes a country?....smartass
@heldercosta5154 жыл бұрын
@@jorgeguanche5327 Dude honestly...I know you can write, so just type Portugal and check out Wikipedia. Portugal is a recognized kingdom and country since 1143!!!!
@The_Honcho3 жыл бұрын
Tfw when you realize the empire was only 1,000 years too late for us to see Roman vs Native American warfare
@christianhernandez69203 жыл бұрын
Those are Spaniards
@longbowenjoyer21542 жыл бұрын
@@christianhernandez6920 those are actually English
This is actually from the movie "The New World". Its a fictitious romance with Pocahontas, John Smith and John Rolfe. It was a good movie but damn it takes a while to get through. Its like a poem in the story telling
@3453453453453454358 ай бұрын
ty
@ernestcass64124 жыл бұрын
Makes me remember Age of Empires 3.
@LtColwtf4 жыл бұрын
Looks like the British in this piece are the stand-ins for the Imperial Stormtroopers.
@tobyoneil19694 жыл бұрын
Ashtray they are. It's Jamestown.
@Daylon914 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't have mattered if they hit anything at all they wouldn't have lasted in hand to hand combat which is what the natives specialized in. Those were farmers and maybe some ex soldiers
@tobyoneil19694 жыл бұрын
daylon boender if all of them hit their targets then yes it would matter. Had they had proper formation, yes it would matter. Ex soldiers are still trained at this point with melee weapons. Weapons a lot longer and better then the shorter clubs and spears of the natives, which wouldn't be as affective against the heavy cotton/wool clothing of the Europeans. Guns are amazing, formation is amazing and training is amazing. The ex soldiers should have had something to throw into the fight.
@talisdorman.97963 жыл бұрын
How can stone age people outmatch the Renaissance? Clubs can't match against rapiers and arrows can't defeat firearms.
@bowen17044 жыл бұрын
The English come to establish a trading post, the Indians say sure, Captain Newport goes on the river and gets attacked, the fort gets attacked, and so begins the expansion of the British empire of North America.
@bowen17044 жыл бұрын
Here to comment/watch weird stuff Yes quite, very quite.
@bowen17044 жыл бұрын
Here to comment/watch weird stuff 😁
@khen07604 жыл бұрын
Oh yes The English good, the Native Americans bad...
@heldercosta5154 жыл бұрын
@zee zing " Chief says no good deal...but fire water so good."
@bowen17044 жыл бұрын
Khen07 Yeah they were cannibals, human sacrificers, scalpers, and shot first.
@matthewmann89693 жыл бұрын
The settlements, villages, named villages, migrant villages, cities, towns, and communities had lots going on behind the scenes
@Georgieastra4 жыл бұрын
The second film is a version of the Fetterman Fight. In real life Fetterman and eighty men were mostly armed with muzzle loaders ( although at least 2 civilians were equipped with lever action Henry repeating rifles.) Crazy Horse and a small group of Lakota lured the detachment several miles from Fort Phil Kearny. Once they were over the ridge line they were ambushed by at least a thousand Lakota warriors. Some Lakota have said that they were more warriors at this battle than at Little Big Horn. If accurate that would mean 2 to 3 thousand men!
@dunbar5553 жыл бұрын
and it was hard winter. people said the blood from the wound would freeze- Been there on the site. way more hilly.
@Cato762 жыл бұрын
At that point they were likely issued some kind of breach loading carbine.
@Daron7181 Жыл бұрын
Lakota and Comanches rolled deep.
@georgewashington339310 ай бұрын
Cato76. Wrong.
@chuckn485110 ай бұрын
@@georgewashington3393 No, definitely not wrong.
@PingasMonkey3rdClass4 жыл бұрын
1:50 what a mad lad
@babymigo.p3 жыл бұрын
@A very hot Cheeto Imao am dead💀 u funny
@DanielMendoza-qq5pv3 жыл бұрын
Lmao jacked native was just plowing thru everyone
@missiavu3 жыл бұрын
This movie, "The New World", made by Terence Malick, has nothing to do with spannish conquistadors, it is revisiting Pocahonta's story that, you, Americans, know very well.
@waynebrown95643 жыл бұрын
Theyre dressed like spainards lol. Bad costume set
@missiavu3 жыл бұрын
No, all west-europeans warriors were dressed like that in that time, @@waynebrown9564 , it was not specifically spaniard.....
@talisdorman.97963 жыл бұрын
@@waynebrown9564 All kingdoms used that type of armour in the period.
@Dom-fx4kt2 жыл бұрын
@@waynebrown9564 No that's what the English wore also, and all western Europeans wore that style armour and helmet. Basically the costume set is accurate. Aren't you American? You should be familiar with your own history
@fab98762 жыл бұрын
The Flag was Spanish..
@thehistoadian4 жыл бұрын
For thoughs wondering the movie is "The new world"
@MithridatesOfficial4 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@jorgeguanche53274 жыл бұрын
Terrible movie...terrible
@thehistoadian4 жыл бұрын
@@jorgeguanche5327 Eh, people can give it a try and decide for them selves, I for one haven't even seen it
@jorgeguanche53274 жыл бұрын
@@thehistoadian if they want they can buy the bluray dvd a póster and a fckin huge dildo...Idc. Im just saying is a baaaaad movie
@sharkonesega4 жыл бұрын
Grazie
@nintexoo4 жыл бұрын
Connor "rode the brave line" twice in AC:3 Trailer. British General had two rows of soldiers and he still charged them alone.
@Zen-rw2fz4 жыл бұрын
it didn't happen ingame, he just went behind the lines and assassinated that general sneakilly.
@nathanmerritt15812 жыл бұрын
They are English colonists not British soldiers. The British Union didn't exist back then.
@forlegalreasonsthatwasajok76083 жыл бұрын
The Amount of Racism in these comments is dissapointing
@vicePVic3 жыл бұрын
I know right... everyone hates white people these days 😕
@forlegalreasonsthatwasajok76083 жыл бұрын
@@vicePVic It's extremely sad that white people are so hated nowadays too I hate that so much hatred exists, Colored people for whites and Whites for colored people ☹️
@SirGeorgeofWorcestershire4 ай бұрын
I haven't seen any racist comment
@forlegalreasonsthatwasajok76084 ай бұрын
@@SirGeorgeofWorcestershire 3 years ago the comments were pretty nasty
@SirGeorgeofWorcestershire4 ай бұрын
@@forlegalreasonsthatwasajok7608 In what sense, against natives?
@ellemoe29194 жыл бұрын
Wow this is like playing Total War with only low morale troops and no commander
@jackstarr47264 жыл бұрын
In reality the aggressive natives were usually smashed..! ;)
@jackstarr47264 жыл бұрын
@Pin I'm extremely proud of my ancestors. What's a racist?
@just_ethanj023 жыл бұрын
@Pin how is that racist?
@SusCalvin3 жыл бұрын
The early colonies are small. They prefer to ally with local tribes instead of getting into big fights with them. Your british settlement might have an allied tribe, while the dutch neighbours further north have their own friends. Sometimes you get pulled into fights because your ally tribe has a feud with some other tribe or the french, sometimes it's you who call on them to come help you out with the french.
@SirGeorgeofWorcestershire4 ай бұрын
True
@Bearj643 жыл бұрын
Being Native American this sets a smile gently on my face
@Komnenos833 жыл бұрын
Why?! That sounds racist, lol.
@orlandofurioso75463 жыл бұрын
Are you one of those obese drunk Nat. Amer. I see all the time on the documentary/news?...Probably ; that make me " I don`t give a fock....amen.
@Praisestoallah73 жыл бұрын
@@orlandofurioso7546 ok pale devil
@hobomike6935 Жыл бұрын
You got invaded and lost.
@BringBackCyrillicBG11 ай бұрын
@@Komnenos83What ? He is proud his people at least showed reisstance to the intruders who massacared them and launched dogs to rip their throats and aöl that just to dig gold. Spain and other conisers are rhe devils of american people
@sopaipa30054 жыл бұрын
Imagine these guys screaming like crazy charging at you
@seniorscouse19842 жыл бұрын
Europeans are just better at fighting
@Jason-sh1xu2 жыл бұрын
Better at bringing diseases you mean
@seniorscouse19842 жыл бұрын
@@Jason-sh1xu thats apart of warfare aint it plus guns n shit
@ales8115074 жыл бұрын
Iron weapons, muskets and armor useless agaist stone age weapons ?
@justice31884 жыл бұрын
when there are more with stones than swords, stones will win. Up to a point
@TheT3MK44 жыл бұрын
Aleš Hildebrand but they didn’t wear iron masks duh
@Dom-fx4kt4 жыл бұрын
I think their weapons are steel
@ales8115074 жыл бұрын
@@justice3188 Fernando Cortez and Francesco Pisaro dont agre with you
@justice31884 жыл бұрын
@@ales811507 with pizaro the natives came in armed and we're routed by cavalry, musketeers and pikemen. I don't know about Cortes but I'll take your word for it.
@LeighJFP4 жыл бұрын
That black dude was bashing people left and right like he practicing this on a daliy bases
@D0nnyy3 жыл бұрын
Native warriors trained since they could walk so yeah it wasn't his first rodeo
@TheGeoDaddy4 жыл бұрын
Ummm, I appreciate the attempt to PC the Noble Savage’s success in battle with the Europeans... but it begs that question how Cortez and - especially - Pizarro took out THOUSANDS of Aztec and Incas with essential the same armor and tempered steel blades... Yes, Cortez and allies... but those allies were never powerful enough to threaten the Aztecs and Pizarro had horses... but he couldn’t fight entirely on horse back... I suggest this was more for the narrative of the movie than any attempt to tell how utterly devastating blade and armor was against stone axes wielded by naked men... and if any one disagrees, you are welcome to come at me NAKED with an ax and I’ll keep the breastplate, helmet and sword (not up mention they would probably have liked!) and we’ll see who wins 999 outta 1,000 (which is pretty much what Pizarro was dealing with in odds else there would have been NO New World
@apexkilo82424 жыл бұрын
smallpox
@TheGeoDaddy4 жыл бұрын
“Small pox” killed a thousand Incas on Day One of the battle to save Montezuma? Naw, it must have been “The Road from Kuwait back to Baghdad” in which technology left the losing side decimated.. and the rest died of open flesh wounds in a tropical climate.
@guccimane994 жыл бұрын
@@TheGeoDaddy The Spaniards lost many battles and also had many allies. Most of the battles were fought between natives.
@kibbles57244 жыл бұрын
Guns, germs and steel, not to mention the Aztecs were surrounded by hated tribes from years of conflict and ritual sacrifice.
@kibbles57244 жыл бұрын
@John Ratican Even at close range a musket ball was often not capable of that, it would usually be lodged in the bone of the initial victim, as recorded by countless injuries of the time where lead balls remain lodged in patients.
@DanielMendoza-qq5pv2 жыл бұрын
1:51 No one gonna talk about this absolute unit going on a spree?
@simondalton37263 жыл бұрын
Love it when the natives kick ass
@catholicracialist7763 жыл бұрын
Cry more
@gc83283 жыл бұрын
they got destroyed lmao
@williammoreno38662 жыл бұрын
@@gc8328 actually your wrong lol many native tribes were very strong and Earupoeans got tierd of fighting them becouse well you guessed it they came in numbers and are extremely skilled native Americas know the wild better then any Eearpeon dose, it's a comeback also many earupoeans just made peace with natives with trendies and stuff the ones that you are talking about that lost were the ones that didn't had numbers and we're out in the open and ofc many died from disease which was just not even fair so who actually really won no one did.
@alexanderchenf13 жыл бұрын
The English and North American Indians were both freer than the Spanish and Aztec subjects.
@catolicosubditodelrey428710 ай бұрын
Is it for this reason that currently in Spanish America the mestizo and Indian population is the majority and on the contrary in Anglo-Saxon America there are no living Indians??? (irony)
@alexanderchenf110 ай бұрын
The population density of the native populati0ons in Latin America was many times denser to begin with@@catolicosubditodelrey4287 . On the other hand, the result also shows the much inferior assimilation power of your civilization
@enriquebergos10 ай бұрын
Sí, sobre todo d cortar cabellera de nativos , tanto hombres, mujeres y niños, costumbre q como todo el mundo sabe la inventaron los españoles ( españoles llegados d Inglaterra, claro!).
@SirGeorgeofWorcestershire4 ай бұрын
Nice joke 😂
@SirGeorgeofWorcestershire4 ай бұрын
@catolicosubditodelrey4287 Basado
@canyonthiess94934 жыл бұрын
Settlement: "has walls" Native Americans: *gg EZ KILLZ*
@serpentphoenix4 жыл бұрын
This makes me worried that if we run into aliens far more advanced than us, we are going to end up like the native americans...
@reptiliandomination13 жыл бұрын
Aliens are demons
@gabbarchauhan36813 жыл бұрын
@@reptiliandomination1 that's exactly what colonialists think of natives
@landsknecht86542 жыл бұрын
@@gabbarchauhan3681 Well...you would too if you were in those woods too.
@landsknecht86542 жыл бұрын
@@reptiliandomination1 Probably are actually....
@mikefranklin12534 жыл бұрын
The very first "war" between English speaking settlers and Natives was at Jamestown when the Natives launched an unprovoked surprise attack.
@michaelosullivan13944 жыл бұрын
unprovoked ?
@ismayilarifoglu62264 жыл бұрын
Ha ha « unprovoked ». Cheap dope?
@dakotacrawford10244 жыл бұрын
You sure about that🤔🤔??
@deadhorse13914 жыл бұрын
The Powhatan massacre of 1622, where Indians on pretense of wanting to trade launched a sneak attack killing 400 men, women and children in various settlements. This was a substantial percentage of the white population. The Indians misjudged the English reaction, they thought they would leave instead the English banded together with re enforcements and started a war of extermination against those that had attacked them The Indians lost.
@jeffluj42924 жыл бұрын
Is war back then
@heldercosta5154 жыл бұрын
And that's how the Indians won!
@hazardous08874 жыл бұрын
Yeah .... about that
@heldercosta5154 жыл бұрын
@@hazardous0887 What do you mean...they haven't won:)
@trololol-up9ye4 жыл бұрын
Ah yes the enemy of the arquebus and pike, litteral pre-historic weapons
@conlinbryant50373 жыл бұрын
This actually was a serious problem in early colonial America. A lot of regions were still densely wooded, and poorly mapped, giving Natives an intense home field advantage no matter the era. A harquebus often required an aiming fork to rest upon, since it was so heavy, meaning that the weapon required preparation before firing added upon the long reload time. Pikes and halberds would be far less useful out of formation, especially with the lower manpower available in an early colonial setting. Don't forget, these weren't professional soldiers most of the time, the professional mercenaries mostly stayed in Europe for the major conflicts, whereas these guys were mostly an inexperienced militia, dependent upon their commanders for leadership and discipline. Versus the natives, who usually preferred guerilla tactics, raids, shock tactics, and honorific dueling, all of which are highlights of tribal and endemic warfare, would mean that colonizers were only be in their element at a fort.
@Justinian5063 жыл бұрын
@tubeyou haynes Muskets versus pre historic weapons still happened during early Spanish colonization such as the conquest of the aztecs
@GeraltofRivia223 жыл бұрын
@@conlinbryant5037 yes, but this is a situation in which those European weapons would thrive. All they had to do was not march OUTSIDE the walls and get slaughtered like complete morons.
@CeBagutte4 жыл бұрын
Its crazy to think that this is what it was like in north america at the beginning.
@jimbob4653 жыл бұрын
It wasn't, this was a shitty movie
@MAV44444Ай бұрын
True Americans defending their land…….that should be the title……
@billn.13183 жыл бұрын
A roman legion that consisted of 20 men would've done a better job holding formation...
@Igor90119983 жыл бұрын
a legion had 4,200 soldiers (5000 if during imperial period)
@landsknecht86542 жыл бұрын
@@Igor9011998 Well in this scenario and situation you're not wrong at all... Buuut the thing is: A. The Roman military was arguably the most disciplined military of all time! And history's first professional military. B. Dover Colonial soldiers, a lot of soldiers are sent out of Europe were not the best soldiers stood in Europe guarding their home countries. C. Warfare change so they did what they knew. What made Shield walls almost obsolete was the Knight & his 15 foot lance and the shock Warfare they practiced. The European Lancers of the Middle Ages were simply a very mobile & fast moving Macedonian Phalanx on horseback who charge almost needs knee in a mounted phalanx formation. Such Lancers didn't really exist anywhere else during the time & did not exist in ancient times either. Medieval Knights can blast through Infantry formations especially a shield wall. So that's why you see Warfare the way it is in the medieval times, and the Infantry had to adapt to that.
@landsknecht86542 жыл бұрын
And almost forgot: D. With plate armor and pike formations these can stop arrows. How can pikes stop arrows? Well by having pikes in different degrees/angels vertically acting as a "projectile shield" from above and a bit in front. Shooting arrows at a pike formation is like shooting at people in a wooded forest, probably not going to hit many of them and if you do hit some they have some steel armor. This is one of the reasons why bows and arrows were becoming less popular in the battlefields of Europe by the 1500s.
@andrewmg59153 жыл бұрын
Hey! That's my great great grandpa caving in the head of my great great grandpa!
@SStupendous3 жыл бұрын
He's killing himself? Think before you comment
@andrewmg59153 жыл бұрын
@@SStupendous What the hell are you talking about? 😂 Go outside and meet a girl, Jesus.
@SStupendous3 жыл бұрын
@@andrewmg5915 Bruh wtf I stated what you said you said your GGG Grandfather killed himself
@andrewmg59153 жыл бұрын
@@SStupendous Okay, thanks for ruining the joke, it flew right over your head. The joke is that I am mixed, that means I have native and spanish blood. Just to clarify, my great great grandparents do not appear in the video. I feel that I need to clarify you that. Think before you comment.
@SStupendous3 жыл бұрын
@@andrewmg5915 Just to clarify, I never thought your grandparents were in the video, or implied that. I said you said your grandfather killed himself, which is what it implies. Think before you comment.
@xivoda3 жыл бұрын
Everyone here in the comment section lookin like war strategists
@imlivingunderyourbed78453 жыл бұрын
Or having common sense. It doesn't take a 4 star general rank to realise that it's much safer to fight within the walls instead of not using any of the defenses they took the time and effort to build.
@matheusalmeida95274 жыл бұрын
Those natives were tough... They fought against fire guns and cannons, things that they never saw before, with courage and determination. Unfortunately it was not enough.
@50zcarsman4 жыл бұрын
What defeated them was an unstoppable combination of inter-tribal jealousies that prevented the tribes from cooperating effectively; smallpox; superior white armaments, and beverage alcohol. Also, the Indians' essentially pessimistic religion told them that they must fight, and if necessary die bravely, whereas the whites looked on Christianity as the thing that would help them win.
@gladiador73704 жыл бұрын
@@50zcarsman the flu killed more natives than the europeans. More than millions.
@50zcarsman4 жыл бұрын
It impacted morale. The Indians' religion was dark and pessimistic, their gods distant and terrifying creatures to be placated, not really worshipped. Their stoic warrior ethic told them they were doomed before the fight began -- so you do your best, but the most you can really expect is an honorable death. The Spaniards, by contrast, felt an intimate connection with God, who was considered good; that He was fighting actively on their side, allowing them to win by His special favor, and that those that those Christians who fell would be the exception. Anyway, they'd end up in a better place -- rather a more encouraging picture of the afterlife than the Indians had.
@jacobkeiser12894 жыл бұрын
50zcarsman bro there’s literally hundreds of different native religions, u can’t just sum them up as the “Indians’ religion...”
@tobyoneil19694 жыл бұрын
50zcarsman being kind of general with what all Native American religions were like.
@thechangamire34954 жыл бұрын
You gotta tell us what movies these clips hail from...
@trevorvallo58414 жыл бұрын
The New World
@pyrothefriendlyarsonist91953 жыл бұрын
What settlement is this? Jamestown?
@Dom-fx4kt2 жыл бұрын
Yes
@chloeomg30214 жыл бұрын
Apparently native Americans are basically wight walkers then
@Daylon914 жыл бұрын
Well we were called Red Devils, wagon burners etc for a reason by the men we fought against and women lol
@gillesteixeira34524 жыл бұрын
Crazy Horse was a great warrior and it always been an act of resistance against european occupation
@rachdarastrix5251 Жыл бұрын
If I was a army of Native Americans I would rather fight 1870s settlers than these settlers. Sure, 1870s settlers had 3 and a half times the rate of fire, but these settlers having plate armor have 11 times the chances that I would fail to harm them.
@YeOldBuccaneer7 ай бұрын
A pike line works well when you have a full battalion. When you have 15 guys, not so much.
@oscarvi32329 ай бұрын
Watching modern Hollywood, it seems incredible that not only did the Europeans capture the Americas, but that the Indians did not go onto conquer all of Europe.
@josephmccormick69224 жыл бұрын
If you want a good fortress get rid of everything around your fortress so the enemy won’t have cover so you can have a perfect shot
@bofangguan61204 жыл бұрын
Well honestly During the colonization period 1 Spanish solder can fight 3 to 5 native warrior face to face. Why? Because Spanish has metal armor helmet and steel sword And native warrior has no armor and usually use wooden or stone axe
@thedon92474 жыл бұрын
Spaniards and most european soldiers were more disciplined and skilled in actual combat, Rather than simple tribal skirmishes.
@matheusalmeida95274 жыл бұрын
Yeah... If this happen in a movie. Because in real life fight against 3 to 5 fearless people is barely impossible, they can put you down, take your sword, put an axe in you throat, take off your helmet and do whatever shit they want to.
@thedon92474 жыл бұрын
Armour doesn't slow you down, that's hollywood fiction. As for body armour being too hot, soldiers wore steel body armour in the desert heat. Native american warriors were far from fearless and generally suffered from poor morale and easily ran from combat. Both of you should think before you leave a comment, as i can tell you're both European hating south americans who don't have a good understanding of what they're talking about.
@matheusalmeida95274 жыл бұрын
@@thedon9247 The question in not if their morale is high, if they run from combat, if they have no organization or things like that. The man who commented first said 1 spanish soldiers can face to face 3 to 5 natives. The fact is that this is barely impossible, because in real life people uses the brain when fighting, it's not scripted like in the movies...
@thedon92474 жыл бұрын
@Jaeson Monteiro wrong in every aspect.
@Carbiniz3r4 жыл бұрын
Its the perfect example of how warfare has changed so much in 1 region that its completely ineffective in another. Weird to think about but their ancestors who fought with sword and shield were probably better equipped to fight this then they are
@fairhair15394 жыл бұрын
Its a movie, this almost never happened.
@colin86969084 жыл бұрын
did you watch the same clip I did, cus they managed to use none of those weapons the way they should be used. Why go outside the walls, why have 5 foot grass outside your walls, why not use a pike as a group weapon instead of going one on one like idiots, why spit up your forces like that, why not keep your guns up on the walls, for gods sakes they had fire arrows...
@cmdrgarbage18952 жыл бұрын
Well it weren't the Europeans who were defeated in the end...
@Carbiniz3r2 жыл бұрын
By the time the natives were wiped out it wasnt even the european colonists anymore. It was first and 2nd gen Americans at that point, it had been almost 100 years by the time you could say Americans even won, Trail of Tears was 1830s and little bighorn was 1870s. Even then, the Sioux and the Seminoles were never conquered in battle.
@dwolf41648 ай бұрын
The new pocahontas movie looks good.
@markas_kasuyademomanisresp65162 жыл бұрын
Native america stealth skills look impressive
@missiavu3 жыл бұрын
This is an extact of Terence Malicks'movie, "The New World", revisiting Pocahonta's story.
@dynastieV53 жыл бұрын
1:50 that Aztec soldier is on killing spree 🤣
@Aztec_Tajger3 жыл бұрын
XDDD
@vestty58023 жыл бұрын
This is in Virginia not México
@dynastieV53 жыл бұрын
@@vestty5802 oops
@ThrashTillDeth854 жыл бұрын
Ah fire arrows, the things that one Natives wouldn't be that familiar with and 2 the thing that has never really worked in any culture that's tried it because they suck for lighting things on fire. Also my god you have walls, it doesn't take a soldier to figure out that manning the walls and not leaving the fort during an attack is the smart thing to do, especially when they enemy doesn't have siege equipment
@sloppierh90623 жыл бұрын
???
@presidentlouis-napoleonbon88893 жыл бұрын
There is a video where a real bowman shoots a fire arrow. The reality of firearrows is (besides what Lloyd in Lindiybeige described that the flames can't hold on to speed, which is true) that you cannot have sufficient inflammables at the arrowhead without seriously risking the balance. So only a small amount of inflammables are add therefore, you can't see the flames really only the smoke. kzbin.info/www/bejne/q32Xp6Gloaiqgqs That is why fire arrows were predominantly used after the target is pasted with inflammables (so that even the smoldering can cause big flames).
@shaquilleonealsfriend28132 жыл бұрын
Natives made fire easily bozo🤡
@ThrashTillDeth852 жыл бұрын
@@shaquilleonealsfriend2813 Fire =\= fire arrows bozo
@kan77r944 күн бұрын
Hahaha this is ridicilous. No army would ever leave the fort and fight an enemy in an open field.
@largestudent1982 жыл бұрын
The howls done by a person using a different language is how users of different language hear English cries of command and pain.
@myrealnamewontfi72893 жыл бұрын
Proud to be European
@incachannel3 жыл бұрын
Proud to be native american
@incachannel3 жыл бұрын
@@inankeles5553 savage but happy 😄☝
@incachannel3 жыл бұрын
@@inankeles5553 dancing happy ✌
@churclan000 Жыл бұрын
@@incachannelit took so much technology to take you guys down. A European couldnt last 1 minute in a hand to hand fight
@incachannel Жыл бұрын
@@churclan000 Many ethnic groups that were enemies of the Incas made a pact with the Castilians. Black soldiers also arrived from Angola, Irish, Jewish converts, Guaraníes, Aztec warriors, and many people with the desire to get rich.
@jamespratt28284 жыл бұрын
And the settlement was right to defend themselves
@ljss68053 жыл бұрын
They shouldn't have been there in the first place. No one invited them.
@jamespratt28283 жыл бұрын
@@ljss6805 oh and does that apply to tribes who stole lands from other tribes???? History of the world ain't ppl making friends Blood and conflict is splattered in every culture and every history Be it in one form or another People explore and expand Difference is the west ended slavery and spread liberty Hell look at the Maoris in new Zealand and what they did to the Moriori Its kill or be killed matey The Souix massacred the Pawnee on their land as well Boers entered empty spaces left that way by lack of settlement and a result of Zulu mass murder years prior And not all new world areas were all owned by tribes many left vacent Defence is a human right A shop owner has the right to defend against antifa A resident against intruders no matter what they claim is justifiable
@ljss68053 жыл бұрын
@@jamespratt2828 Tribes stealing lands from other tribes, as you said, is, well, tribes stealing from other tribes---couldn't have said it better myself. Emphasis: stealing. You're outright idiotic if you think that legitimates European colonialism. But no offense meant. You probably never took a logic class. Also, you seem to have a pretty selective view of history. Sure, blood and conflict is splattered in every culture; but so is peacemaking, friend-making, alliance-making, prosperity without war, commercial treaties, mutual-ensured prosperity, and long-lasting peace and co-existence accords. Maybe the problem is we put men into positions of power that should probably have best been left to women. The historical record shows quite clearly that societies ruled by women are on the whole more peaceful, prosperous, and stable. Also, I guess, that they can handle COVID-19 better. LOL. Maybe it's time for men to move over.
@jamespratt28283 жыл бұрын
@@ljss6805 evidence of societies ruled by women more peaceful? Celts were pretty full on Cleopatra and female pharoahs waged wars So did Katherine the great and Mary Queen of Scots and need I even mention Maggie Thatcher rightfully defending the falklands? What about the Chinese empress queen's who had their fair share of blood spilt? Alliance making and such as you described where did that happen beat without duress? In the west All I said if you'd actually read and got off your high horse was that the west is the one that freed slaves and spread liberty That conquest happened the world over So saying someone shouldnt have been there at the time is easy to say and not so black and white in you're in those times and each day was a struggle to live Gheghis Khan was the biggest murderer in human history But what he left as a result changed civilizations for the better Doesn't justify 400000 dead and millions slaved and raped But the result cannot be changed And the merit system is a great legacy to have than leave it behind with his millions dead Alot of that so called peace making you talk about was many times like with communism steeped in vexing and intimidating others When you're defending your life and property all politics are irrelevant when that first arrow or bullet or molotov cocktail barely misses you And the fact that you just blanket blame all men says alot about you Men provide and protect women Scum rape and cause harm You should show men appreciation for protecting you
Why always in movies native americans must be super hero? 🤔
@ryack63554 жыл бұрын
Especially considering they lost...
@fazrul784 жыл бұрын
because native defend their homeland but history call them robber by robber
@ryack63554 жыл бұрын
Chao Tiep The native Americans fought against eachother and stole eachothers land for thousands of years. But there’s always a bigger fish (European countries)
@Internut19854 жыл бұрын
Ryack 63 they didn’t lose. They died of smallpox and other diseases. Without that they could not be defeated
@Dom-fx4kt4 жыл бұрын
@@Internut1985 The last bit you said was very untrue
@kwando4724 жыл бұрын
Look at all these professional history people in the comment section. They all know why these natives won. But it's just a movie, how little we differ still from the people from the middle ages.
@helengao60937 ай бұрын
Were Mongols still around in the 1600s?
@doodlydoo39354 жыл бұрын
Imagine the natives having modern weapons lmao
@samueldelrosal30294 жыл бұрын
"The trees are speaking..."
@doodlydoo39354 жыл бұрын
@@samueldelrosal3029 "The trees are speaking NATIVES"
@doodlydoo39354 жыл бұрын
@Menkrep 1337 yea lol
@gospaironija27624 жыл бұрын
You mean white weapons right? watch this move so you feel better xD
@gospaironija27624 жыл бұрын
@Afro Highborne I know you are black but gunpowder is not a gun btw and i dont think Chinese even create gunpowder and to think you have that for 1.000+ years and never think to make a wepon out of it is prety bad but then there are you that create notihng and have power just to destroy.No point in talking more since you will lie and care nothing about the truth.
@MarkToTheMoon4 жыл бұрын
Englishmen were lagging on the native servers
@Mgslikker3 жыл бұрын
Fighting a native would have been terrifying
@aleksaculjak79174 жыл бұрын
When will movie producers learn that fire arrows don't exist
@SolarTerran4 жыл бұрын
One day and that day may never come.
@kingofbeers56734 жыл бұрын
In December of '66 you met me face to face. I decoyed your Captain Fetterman, and we never left a trace. Into our Sacred Homeland your blue coat soldiers came, and we just taught you a heap big lesson in the Battle of a 100 slain.
@ejhickey4 жыл бұрын
Won the battle . Lost the war.
@Disappearingboy1039 Жыл бұрын
Well…. Spaniards won in the end
@bellcrosswolfstein19424 жыл бұрын
I miss playing American Conquest in my childhood.
@dany97fn3 жыл бұрын
I still fucking playing that glorious game.
@rc59191 Жыл бұрын
Hey what's the name of that documentary at the end?
@petermcallister1072 ай бұрын
The initial settlements had a skewed ratio of persons. Many found labouring work beneath them,it's amazing Jamestown survived at all,other attempts did fail. Smith was a man with flaws but kept Jamestown going. I've just got two recently published military histories(I'm Scottish)the first is published by Helion and Co,by David Child's and called New world's ,old wars covering the campaigns from 1607-1678 and the other is Osprey books Campaign Series on Jamestown,studying the start of the colony from a purely military perspective. I've also got a great book by Pen and sword books on uniforms of the various colonies from around 1600-1700 which is handy for I've purchased a 28mms scale English army of the Jamestown early period for wargaming using pikemans lament rules by Osprey.
@Mickeywonderwall4 жыл бұрын
Not historical accurate at all
@henryguhoh16694 жыл бұрын
Do you have a time machine? Actually there?
@Kilinho984 жыл бұрын
@@henryguhoh1669 You know that something like history books and artifacts exists?
@Kilinho984 жыл бұрын
@Ginger Ginger It is not as that simple, lol 😂 Reports from events could be subjective in favor of victor, but still events are reported. As time flies historians tries to look at things unbiased. For example for centuries Roman emperor Nero was defamated by his political rivals or ensuing ceasars, but now we know why he was hated and what was true or not
@Kilinho984 жыл бұрын
@Ginger Ginger 😂😂😂 wow, how so? Tell me please some examples
@Kilinho984 жыл бұрын
@Ginger Ginger Lol, better would be to show me false unbiased history. Even wehrmacht soldiers got their respect