Oh wow, never really seen a Kropatschek up close before, the build quality on that rifle is beautiful.
@gregoryfilin80405 жыл бұрын
I've never seen one in such amazing condition. The ones I've held have been beat to death.
@matthayward78895 жыл бұрын
Loving these French rifles, you know Ian’s book is going to be brilliant!
@korisosuke21545 жыл бұрын
Most were sent to Russia *most did not survive Russia*
@willh89505 жыл бұрын
Kori Sosuke That’s funny, a lot of Russians didn’t survive Russia 🤷🏻♂️
@DefconMaster5 жыл бұрын
@@willh8950 Neither did the French or the Germans
@willh89505 жыл бұрын
@@DefconMaster accurate! What lesson do we learn from this? Never. Go. To. Russia.
@tarrydmunster19165 жыл бұрын
In the rest of the world, guns kill people. In Soviet Russia, people kill guns.
@firepower70175 жыл бұрын
@@willh8950 Or Vietnam
@Chyrosran223 жыл бұрын
Holy crap, it looks like the condition on this is immaculate Oo .
@EdgarInventor5 жыл бұрын
Kropatschek. A name that sounds like a Bolt Action cycling. Someone had to say it! LOL
@Slyd_Fox5 жыл бұрын
Now it's stuck in my head. Kropatschek. BLAM! Kropatschek. BLAM!
@ryc3rz5 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a Czech surname...probably Kropaćek in original.
@MartaRzehorz4 жыл бұрын
@@ryc3rz Kropáček, diminutive of "kropáč" meaning "holy water sprinkler" (both the weapon and the ceremonial tool)
@realmacgrey64212 жыл бұрын
@@MartaRzehorz Kropáč is also a mediveal weapon known in the west as the Gutenmorgen.
@genghiskhan68092 жыл бұрын
Here, take this 👑.
@Italian_Spiderman5 жыл бұрын
In my years of watching your videos I’ve really come to love French rifles that I never gave any thought to before. The passion is infectious!!
@randywatson83475 жыл бұрын
The engineering and machining of the bolt system looks so beautifull. Gorgeous condition.
@jayfelsberg19315 жыл бұрын
According to my venerable 11th edition of Small Arms of the World, the Turks obtained about 30,000 Winchesters and used them with awful effct at Plevna. First they fired their single shot weapons and when the Russians made their rush at the Turkish lines, the Turks picked up their Winchesters and hoed away. The results were pretty bad, as the Russians assumed they had a clear run - in formation p- at the Turks. Bummer.
@johnfisk8115 жыл бұрын
The Winchesters were Turkish cavalry weapons. Re evaluation of primary sources is making some wonder if the events were that the Turkish infantry engaged the Russians at maximum range right down to the final assault whilst the dismounted Turkish cavalry had to wait until the Russians were within the close range of their Winchesters. Whether by accident or design the story of Plevna is the trigger for magazine rifles to be generally adopted. The story being that each Turkish soldier at Plevna had a both a Peabody Martini and a Winchester. Being in a well supplied dug in defended position the Turks had no issues over ammunition supply.
@jayfelsberg19315 жыл бұрын
@@johnfisk811 TYTY for the information
@kenibnanak55545 жыл бұрын
Smith's, "Small Arms of the World" (if you can find a copy) has a pretty good description of the battle.
@kevinoliver3083 Жыл бұрын
The Ottoman troops did not change weapons mid-fight. A percentage of men in some infantry regiments had Winchesters while the majority had Peabody-Martinis. At Plevna they had the fire discipline to only use their Winchesters at short range.
@kevinoliver3083 Жыл бұрын
@@johnfisk811The majority of Winchesters bought by the Ottomans were full-length military rifles. They were used by light infantry units.
@bonelessdoritoslocostaco59845 жыл бұрын
These old french guns are pretty cool, but let's see Ian shoot every french rifle from the Chassepot to the FAMAS G2
@skeeter39695 жыл бұрын
Ill pay to see that
@jmjedi9235 жыл бұрын
So the French adopted like 4 guns in the span of like 30 years?
@ForgottenWeapons5 жыл бұрын
This is not uncommon during this period. The US had the Spencer, Trapdoor, Krag, and Lee Navy in the span of 30 years.
@thrifikionor76035 жыл бұрын
Germany as well. Mauser 71, Mauser 71-84, G88, G98
@cardiffpicker15 жыл бұрын
Congratulations , the number of likes for your comment have surpassed the number of them in it.
@lavrentivs98915 жыл бұрын
Not that many compared to aircraft development during WW1 or tank development during WW2^^
@terryreynolds93975 жыл бұрын
Technology was changing rapidly. Breech-loaders replaced muzzle-loaders, then were quickly obsolete because of the metallic cartridge. Then, it was clear repeating arms were making single-shots obsolete. Briefly there was going to be a move to small-bore higher velocity with finer black powder, but this step was interrupted by the advent of smokeless powder (also with smaller bore). Chassepot (breech-loading) to Gras (metallic cartridge) to Kropatschek (repeater) to Lebel and Berthier (Small bore, Smokeless Powder). Today, technology is developing even more rapidly, but the advances aren't making existing weapons obsolete. The changes aren't so fundamental.
@Omnihil7775 жыл бұрын
To speak with another Kevin-Hoganism: Condition, condition, condition! What a beautiful rifle it is!
@tomaszbartkow35525 жыл бұрын
Is impressive how this channel grew. More people are watching. Better quality of videos. Step by step its going in right direction. I recommend Forgotten Weapons in past to my friends and I will recommend time and time again. Well done Ian. Right balance of facts, history, and technical info 👍
@utubesuxbigdonkeybal5 жыл бұрын
Yet another great video, Ian. You briefly mentioned Interarms and Samuel Cummings. The man and company are fascinating, and I think would be a great topic for a video. Cheers!
@morelenmir5 жыл бұрын
Just flicking through the Kickstarter pages, it really does look like a class product--very much how Dorling Kindersley used to be in the 1990's. Lots of high quality illustrations printed on top quality paper. Definitely something to order if you can afford it.
@vigunfighter5 жыл бұрын
for a moment I thought you were going to say: "war were declared"... :)
@con6lex5 жыл бұрын
Peter Charles I think he did on one video.
@Bluesnipible5 жыл бұрын
Congratulations on getting $300k+ in preorders on your new book. Must be a great feeling for you.
@loupiscanis94495 жыл бұрын
Thank you , Ian .
@ambravirlebreton5 жыл бұрын
I love your serie about french weapons!! keep on going
@OneEyePI5 жыл бұрын
That thing is in gorgeous condition
@user-ns3vs3bp3e5 жыл бұрын
So gun Jesus has written his first bible...
@chrisyoung38085 жыл бұрын
the machining is beautiful
@kenny3445 жыл бұрын
Hey congrats on finishing the book!
@Pcm9795 жыл бұрын
I remember from your earlier Lebel video that the Lebel bolt had to be cycled quite harshly to actuate the lifter. The Gras' lifter seems much easier to work. Is there a reason for that?
@ForgottenWeapons5 жыл бұрын
No, they are about the same.
@Pcm9795 жыл бұрын
@@ForgottenWeapons I see, thanks. I guess my mind was playing tricks on me.
@irodwen5 жыл бұрын
i would love to see a series or a video about the development, experiments, and process of the invention of smokeless powder. Whether anyone else was trying the same, how the french tried to keep it secret, and how it was exposed.
@luisantolafrancis5195 жыл бұрын
ok thats a gorgeous example of the kropatscheck looks brand new!!! just a litlle rust shade in the buttplate.
@TaZ101SAGA2 жыл бұрын
That rifle is in exception condition, damn.
@combobreaker02015 жыл бұрын
This man is the Bob Ross of guns.
@havareriksen10042 жыл бұрын
The lessons of the effect of rapid fire with Winchester lever action guns at Plevna mirrors that of Custer's last stand, at the Battle of Little Big Horn. Though at both battles other weapons also contributed much, the barrage of rapid fire at the crucial moment proved to be decisive. The Battle of Little Big Horn preceded Plevna by 1 year and should have warned european armies of the dangers of the rapid fire barrage from repeating firearms, but I guess it didn't get much attention in Europe at the time.
@waynedaley70485 жыл бұрын
What a beauty rifle
@randomotaku40375 жыл бұрын
That is in fantastic condition for its age.
@davidwallace57385 жыл бұрын
Great video. Thank you sir.
@mordecaieagle42405 жыл бұрын
I promise that as soon get my next paycheck i'll order your book (if i have something left after paying my bills).
@sionsoschwalts27625 жыл бұрын
1884 Krapotschek is very similar to the 1886 Krapotschek but has some odd differences and similarities with the Gras Rifle.
@PKPK-rr3rs5 жыл бұрын
You should make a German military rifles book, it would be very interesting as well.
@WhattAreYouSaying2 жыл бұрын
Very nice! I have a 1886 Kropatschek. My rifle has a really low serial number, looks like it is one off the first hundreds that was produced. It also seems to have been used A LOT. The bluing is gone all over the rifle, it basically looks like silver. The stock is also really beaten up, with deep scratches and marks everywhere. But despite all this it has a really smooth action. I really wonder what stories my rifle would tell if it could talk.
@nickz58499 ай бұрын
What is considered a low serial number? Like what range in the numbers? 1000s?
@WhattAreYouSaying9 ай бұрын
@@nickz5849 Around 49,000 rifles were made in total, counting all M1886-variants. The serial number on mine is just above 400, the letter "A" is before the serial number. So with a 400 serial number and the letter "A", it is an early rifle from the first 400's. The rifles were produced with a 3 digit serial number, with 1 and later 2 identical letters. They were produced in letter blocks. 2 identical letters indicates the second production run. They produced 999 rifles for each letter because of the 3 digit serial numbers. When all the rifles from A to Z were produced, they started with 2 letters before the serial number. "AA 1" being the first rifle of the 2 letter production run and "ZZ 999" being the last rifle of the 2 letter production run. The letters was in alphabetical order, from A to Z. For example: "A 1" would be the first rifle ever produced, "ZZ 999" would be the last rifle. Only 2 alphabetical blocks of rifles were produced, the production stopped just a few letters before they actually reached "ZZ 999". So the serial numbers should look like this, from first rifle to last rifle: First production run: "A 1" = first rifle. "Z 999" = last rifle. And: Second production run: "AA 1 = first rifle. "ZZ 999" = last rifle.
@Retarior5 жыл бұрын
Yes, Mr. Kropáček was a great constructer. That is the correct writting of the name... Kropáček. He is, was, Czech.
@Tallmios5 жыл бұрын
I thought it didn't sound to be of Austrian origin.
@totallynotacommie47672 жыл бұрын
You could say he was Kropaczech
@Retarior2 жыл бұрын
@@totallynotacommie4767 Indeed :-D a genuine Czechnology Steam-punk era maker.
@brunoseno78273 ай бұрын
please make a video about the Brazilian navy kropatscheck. It's hard to find sources about this on the internet but I think you have the right contacts.
@AardigGeflipt5 жыл бұрын
god dammit i love this channel
@AdurianJ5 жыл бұрын
This rifle being issued to second line troops is sort of how the Swedish 6,5mm Mauser was used in Finnish service.
@Kaboomf5 жыл бұрын
And how the Gewehr 71 was used by rear-echelon German troops in WWI. According to my great grandfather's diary he was issued a Gew 71 at some point in 1916 or 1917. Basically all nations have done something similar at one point or another; there's stories of Remington Rolling Blocks being handed out in 1940.
@AdurianJ5 жыл бұрын
@@Kaboomf In the Union Crisis in 1905 between Sweden and Norway the predecessor of the "Home Guard" still had Remington Roller blocks ! And as late as 1940 in Sweden cooks where still armed with sabers.
@asphaltmemories45975 жыл бұрын
Gorgeous example, will we see a Portuguese one in the future as well?
We are doubly blessed! An 1884, too? And it cleared up my questions about the cut-off lever, too! Do you also have an 1885?
@ForgottenWeapons5 жыл бұрын
Alas, I have not yet found an 1885.
@Zajuts1495 жыл бұрын
One can understand the magazine cut-off mechanism from a logistical point of view, especially with black-powder rifles, were ammunition was more expensive. It still makes some sense with a tube-magazine rifle, as the reload of the magazine would still be done 1 round at a time. You need a box-magazine that can be fed with stripper clips to make the magazine cut-off entirely obsolete.
@schwaulen5 жыл бұрын
I think the cut-off has more to do with the doctrine of the time. I think even the earlier Enfields had a cut-off, despite the stripper-fed box magazine.
@jcorbett96205 жыл бұрын
@@schwaulen Correct. The SMLE didn't do away with the magazine cut-off until the middle of WWI, around 20-30 years after the first box magazine Metfords and Enfields.
@Zajuts1495 жыл бұрын
That was sort of my point. The original rationale was both to conserve ammunition and to have a ready reserve for when things got hectic. With stripper clips, you reload your magazine so fast that it doesn't matter if do aimed shots from the magazine or reload one cartridge at the time at long range. With smokeless powder being cheaper, it is easier to bring and expend more, especially since the cartridges get better and won't "spoil".
@LankyAssMofka5 жыл бұрын
@@schwaulen Did US guns of the time have cut off as well? I'd think that feature would have been handy in the west against the native americans. Take potshots when at long range and when they charge in or surround you, then open up the magazine.
@schwaulen5 жыл бұрын
@@LankyAssMofka I know the Winchester Hotchkiss did. I think the Springfield 1903 still had one as well and I'm sure there were others.
@yelar90005 жыл бұрын
Yay new video
@ScottKenny19785 жыл бұрын
Ian, you *tease!* You're going to show us that beautiful rifle (that looks like it came off the assembly line last week, not 140 years ago!), and not shoot it?!?
@billsummy24125 жыл бұрын
AWESOME !
@mazkact5 жыл бұрын
I don't trust these newfangled repeaters just gimme a Rolling Block.
@mordecaieagle42405 жыл бұрын
I don't trust those newfangled cartridge guns, just gimme a 1853 Enfield.
@mazkact5 жыл бұрын
Not even a Snider converted 1853? I have one( as well as a Rolling Block) The Snider is minute of enemy column.
@williammagoffin93245 жыл бұрын
I don't trust those newfangled shooty things, just gimme a pike.
@mazkact5 жыл бұрын
I am really partial to David slings
@gregoryfilin80405 жыл бұрын
I don't trust this fire thing. Just lemme hunt in the dark with a rock. I don't need those darned spears.
@singleshot22185 жыл бұрын
Ian..would you do one on the MAS semi auto?
@ForgottenWeapons5 жыл бұрын
Actually, I will cover the whole MAS semiauto series in the next two weeks. The MAS -44, 49, 49/56, MSE, and NATO models.
@singleshot22185 жыл бұрын
@@ForgottenWeapons I have a 49/56, very accurate, and fun to shoot!
@122ALVARO115 жыл бұрын
Is it me or the elevator on the kropatscheck looks smoother than the one on the lebel? It doesn t seem to need that yank that the lebel usually needs to feed
@Isaihernandez7772 жыл бұрын
I need one 😍😍😍
@beast03395 жыл бұрын
I'd love something like this for the US or Germany, I'm familiar with the UK's military history since there's a reserve camp right next door but I'm less familiar with the American and German Military history. Perhaps a future Idea
@BigHugePotatoes5 жыл бұрын
Something about the look of the action makes me feel funny.
@tekumeku22443 жыл бұрын
I just got the Bayonet for one of these. Now i just need the gun itself
@dobypilgrim61605 жыл бұрын
What a gorgeous rifle! Question for anyone who knows: Why did the French in particular continue to refuse to ad a manual safety on their bolt action service rifles?
@salvadorsempere17015 жыл бұрын
Because they don´t believe that a manual safety its safe enought. So the doctrine in the french Army was to carry your weapon with an empty chamber. Really you don´t save a lot of time from having to remove the manual safety to having to use the action.
@OneShotNick925 жыл бұрын
Kropatschek ooohh
@cankatsoyugur43205 жыл бұрын
Could you take a look at the Turkish Killigil Pistol?
@lorenzogiuliani9144 Жыл бұрын
Una curiosità: tra uno steyr-manlicher 1888 e un kropatschek quale è meglio?
@munkbok5 ай бұрын
the 1888 by far
@victorlacas66495 жыл бұрын
I don't know if you'll read this post Ian but I'm wondering if there will be a french translation of your book.
@extragoogleaccount60615 жыл бұрын
He has a video on that topic (haven't seen it myself so I don't know if he was announcing it or proposing it)
@xriz005 жыл бұрын
I'd like to see how you load this kind of gun with the tube mag.
@WeDontTalkAboutJosh5 жыл бұрын
you open the bolt, push the lifter down and push individual rounds into the tube like you're loading a winchester 1887 shotgun.
@tz87855 жыл бұрын
Side note about the concern on the soldiers shooting off their ammunition too quickly - this apparently was a bit of a problem during the Second Schleswig War.
@ChodaStanks5 жыл бұрын
Im looking for the 1885 ones that look like Lebels, even more rare
@mart_en4 жыл бұрын
So within 20 years the French army changed their main rifle, which each time was mass produced in millions, four times ?
@steveshoemaker63475 жыл бұрын
Quel beau fusil et tres bien fait WOW Merci mon ami ...Until the next time...!
@SpacePatrollerLaser5 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately, I have lost the eyesight needed to read print. Did Othias order a copy yet?
@wewlad86975 жыл бұрын
How do you type/read KZbin comments?
@jayfelsberg19315 жыл бұрын
Did the rifle use a version of the French soldier/s beloved Rosalie (s), the very narrow, long bladed like that used on more modern French rifles?
@ForgottenWeapons5 жыл бұрын
No, it used the Gras bayonet. "Rosalie" was the Lebel bayonet, and wasn't designed until 1886.
@matthewspencer50865 жыл бұрын
When I first heard about the Headstamp Publishing project, I commented that one of the rules of self-publishing was to NEVER miss a chance to publicise the book. I am glad to say that Ian has taken this advice to heart!
@johnstacy79025 жыл бұрын
Cleaning rod or stuck cartrige removal rod
@MaHaL13375 жыл бұрын
Cleaning. That little slot in the front is so you can stick a cleaning patch through it before wrapping it around the head, it's thr same style of head on the cleaning rod for my C7, just not collapsible.
@johnstacy79025 жыл бұрын
@@MaHaL1337 I was being a bit sarcastic. those old BP cartridges would jam quite often or extractors would break. Is handy to have rod in case you have to punch somthing out
@ChodaStanks5 жыл бұрын
I want a 1884 or 1885, hard to find
@ThePlaceCannel5 жыл бұрын
Every time Ian mentions his book, I die a little inside, because I don't have enough money to afford one at the moment. Who wants to buy a book for me?
@LankyAssMofka5 жыл бұрын
Yeah it sucks, I can afford the book even though it's US dollars and I'm Canadian, but the 50 USD shipping is what's stopping me, it's ridiculous. I'll just keep supporting through Patreon. :(
@ThePlaceCannel5 жыл бұрын
@@LankyAssMofka Great idea! Lol
@Think_about_this_world5 жыл бұрын
Hello! Thanks for a very interesting video! Every day I start by watching your channel. but I do not speak good English, and I ask you to add subtitles. to translate into Russian.
@ryker83385 жыл бұрын
That rifle almost looks like a last decade or later manufacture if it wasn't for the dates and the dents on the stock.
@pedrotheswift59375 жыл бұрын
What pushes the next round onto the loading tray?
@ForgottenWeapons5 жыл бұрын
The magazine tube spring.
@DanielTitley5 жыл бұрын
Were they still using black-powder ammo when they were sent to Russian and Spain?
@MarvinCZ5 жыл бұрын
They were not modified to fire any other cartridge and they wouldn't be strong enough for smokeless powder with just the bolt handle as the only locking lug.
@DanielTitley5 жыл бұрын
@@MarvinCZ Maybe they had reduced-power smokeless ammo, similar to modern cowboy action ammo.
@Lrr_Of_Omikron5 жыл бұрын
Does anyone make a modern Famas that's cheaper than the batch Century Arms had in the 80s that go for $30,000?
@ForgottenWeapons5 жыл бұрын
No.
@Zorglub19665 жыл бұрын
until 3D metal printed parts is reliable and affordable, it will never happen.
@giovannifontana14335 жыл бұрын
In Europe u can by one in good condition for 1/10 of the price, but it will come in 222rem.
@hilariousmax67325 жыл бұрын
4:37 did you say 1900 meters? They were shooting out to a mile+ accurately in the late 1800s?
@poppasquat84835 жыл бұрын
Used for volley fire
@magoid5 жыл бұрын
Is what they call volley fire. You get a bunch of guys aiming at a target in the distance, everyone shots, maybe someone hits something. I believe is more a suppressing fire than anything, like the most improvised form of artillery.
@jcorbett96205 жыл бұрын
As others have mentioned, it was not for accurate fire, but creating a "beaten area". Don't forget at this period, armies were still using the close formations that had been used in the Napoleonic (and earlier) wars, so there would be a large number of troops marching in a tightly packed formation. If all your troops aim at the formation using the 1900m sights, they will be unable to hit any specific individual, but by aiming very high, they create a rain of bullets through which the column has to march. There might be no casualties, there might be a few, but the effect is more psychological, than militarily effective. Try to imagine the effect of having to march through this rain, with maybe the odd man being hit, knowing there is no way you can avoid being hit if the bullet arc and your position co-incide.
@salvadorsempere17015 жыл бұрын
Yes. Your target its a closed order 800-mansize target. Acurate enought.
@alanvonify5 жыл бұрын
You need a cop to check that Kropatschek. Or how about check yourself before you Kropatschek yourself. Either one, I’m happy.
@BeefaloBart5 жыл бұрын
I see that name and keep thinking it says Kraptastic...
@ollikrogars6885 жыл бұрын
Where they not made in Portugal to?
@ForgottenWeapons5 жыл бұрын
Portugal bought theirs from Steyr.
@randyrick80195 жыл бұрын
I have an old web page with pictures of the various models of the Portuguese Kropatschek made by Steyr at randyrick.us/AustrianFirearms/rmkrop.htm
@ECESW5 жыл бұрын
Kropatschek sounds a bit of a Polish name. Interesting.
@fastmongrel5 жыл бұрын
Southern Poland was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire so its possible Kropatschek came from Poland.
@jeanjabonite45785 жыл бұрын
Philippine sub machine gun pls floro mk9
@kaneto885 жыл бұрын
It's Pleven, not Plevna.
@trenvan55465 жыл бұрын
I wonder why the french did undervalue the quality of their troops so consistently..
@tonylittle77825 жыл бұрын
Can you do a video on mas 36 serial numbers and one on French bayonets? Love your channel. Keep up the masterful work
@NRJenzenJones5 жыл бұрын
You'll want to check out Ian's book!
@DashRendar3085 жыл бұрын
Why does shipping a book to Germany cost 60,-$?
@MrSven30005 жыл бұрын
erm ... ok. i always thought the kropatschek was austro-hungarian ?
@rustyteague85745 жыл бұрын
my cocking piece only has one notch
@breakneckmilk93245 жыл бұрын
You ever just already buy the book to flex on the fake forgotten weapons fans
@birddog97085 жыл бұрын
Henry Case that makes no sense
@birddog97085 жыл бұрын
Chemus Van Der Geek what's he going to do with a book , colour it in . 😂 Being able to read and write is quite handy when it comes to reading books
@rintinfin44405 жыл бұрын
@@birddog9708 is there something I'm missing from you comment? I ask, because I noticed you wrote, "What's he going to do with a book...😂😂😂😂" and figured that I must be missing some type of context.
@Bluesnipible5 жыл бұрын
@@rintinfin4440 He was joking that the original comment didn't make grammatical sense, so he would have trouble reading the book.
@birddog97085 жыл бұрын
RinTin Fin if you load a magazine with Crayola wax crayons: the red ones go the fastest😂
@robertcolbourne3865 жыл бұрын
Let's see hmmmm 1 yr after Crazy Horse showed the same thing at the Little Big Horn , in the words of a famous civil war General, "ohhhhh shit"
@LionofCaliban5 жыл бұрын
Dare I ask, we're still looking at blunt nosed ammunition here?
@Hybris511295 жыл бұрын
Correct Spitzer bullets weren't really use by most militaries until shortly before or early in WWI with some like Italy if I remember correctly stayed with the bottle nose projectiles until after WWI.
@ForgottenWeapons5 жыл бұрын
Yes, this was flat-nosed, unjacketed lead 11mm ammo.
@LionofCaliban5 жыл бұрын
@@ForgottenWeapons Thanks for confirming. I suspected as much.
@dhananjaychafale65455 жыл бұрын
French really Very quick replacing rifle.
@shadowwarrior29745 жыл бұрын
I thought mle meant magazine Lee Enfield? Don't get me wrong... Love you Ian. Just wanted to know what that stood for.
@ForgottenWeapons5 жыл бұрын
In a British context it does; in this case it is an abbreviation of "Modele".
@jkleopard46175 жыл бұрын
Sean Gibson Thats for English in French it means model
@jakefromabove_og5 жыл бұрын
idk for sure, but I think that in a french context Mle means Modèle, or Model
@jkleopard46175 жыл бұрын
Oops
@sumvs59924 жыл бұрын
Because I've only heard the name from Americans, and Americans (for some reason) pronounce most A's as an O sound, I tried searching up some polish looking names like: "cropocek" and "kropocek". Why do americans punish my british ears?
@svacar5 жыл бұрын
Kropatschek thats a czech name tho modified for non czechs
@niklas85525 жыл бұрын
Sup my Friend? :D
@floflo80185 жыл бұрын
"if the french army is going to adopt a rifle they're not going to buy it from some foreign manufacturer[...]it's going to be made in one of the french arsenal's probably several of the french arsenal's" OOF
@ForgottenWeapons5 жыл бұрын
Well, until they close all their arsenals, anyway.
@user-nh6mm2gg8i3 жыл бұрын
Its not french
@AsbestosMuffins5 жыл бұрын
I can't imagine being given a black powder rifle when your enemies have sub machineguns and flamethrowers coming at you
@florian21995 жыл бұрын
At least you have something to shoot at them
@birddog97085 жыл бұрын
The Afghan managed ok against the Russians with them
@andyrihn15 жыл бұрын
Beats a sharp stick
@andyrihn15 жыл бұрын
DOUG HEINS fun fact: during WW2, the British military was putting every remotely viable gun into service that they could that when it came to arming the Homeguard, a volunteer force for the possibility of a German invasion, entire units were issued spears. The problem with bows is that they’re generally more of an expert weapon
@andyrihn15 жыл бұрын
DOUG HEINS those French losses were precisely because of the prowess of English longbow-men (even drawing a proper English longbow requires training). But as the 100 years war waged on the skilled longbow men died the French crossbow rose to prominence because it was so much quicker to train peasants to use
@8147905 жыл бұрын
Good God that metal...... whitest white I've ever seen.