1972: Apollo 17 (NASA)

[@larrymonske8086]

I had the honor of being the first person to see Apollo 17 re-enter the atmosphere. 90 Miles off North Vietnam it looked like someone fired a missile at us. I was bridge watch on USS Saratoga. The xo came out and watched this red hot thing zoom across the sky. It took 4 hours and a call to Fleet to figure out what that was.The CO called me inside at the end of my watch. He is the one that told me that .

[@chezza81]

Larry Monske wow that’s amazing!

[@mikehunt3688]

Yeah, I’ve gotta say that’s pretty damn cool

[@pajasa62]

Larry Monske Great story....and THANKS for your service.

[@ilikecheese237]

Great story, amazing!

[@jasontipton8430]

That is so cool larry

[@Pongant]

Watching these guys improvising and doing all kinds of stuff just shows how important human presence is for exploration...

[@rudirosti5501]

Pongant yes,billions for stupid stones!!

[@jackdull5699]

@@rudirosti5501 : Really moron? It's for scientific knowledge about the moon. We need to go back to the moon and learn more it.

[@LennyBruiser]

Jack dull “we’ve” never been there. NASa is a farce and simply a way to extract money from the people to distribute it among the elites

[@Pongant]

@@rudirosti5501 I would rather pump billions of dollars into space exploration than into an uncontrolled, tumorous capitalism as we have today...

[@trinivagrant]

Space travel doesn't exist. They said they travelled 800,000 km in the 60's. Through extreme temperatures, radiation, space debris, etc Look at how techology like virtual reality evolved from pong around 60's. We went 800,000 km to moon supposedly 5 times 55 years ago We cant do it anymore? We cant even get commercial flights 100km into orbit? We have 10,000 satellites and no videos of them in orbit? 0 for 10,000? We can build an ISS that has no construction videos exactly proving the theoretical into the actual? 0 minutes of actual construction out of over millions of minutes of construction Showing us how modules were tracked in those conditions and how astronauts linked to modules and built sealant valves in vaccum like conditions etc There are third party pictures of iss but no videos showing the iss, planet, stars? 0 hours out of thousands of hours?

[@larrymanning5925]

I've lived on the space coast all my life and I'm almost 50. Those night launches are truly spectacular. I've seen so many launches, but the night ones are the most memorable.

[@enzopasquini1931]

Gli arrivi invece sono più difficili da vedere, perché non ci siete mai andati!! Svegliate i neuroni sopiti!

[@Milkomeda_Galaxy]

It feels like they’re making the night to the day for some seconds

[@Raaaaaaahhhhhhh]

7:38 this has gotta be one of the most bruh moments in my life

[@philippelestrat3276]

"Bruh" Gene Cernan , on the surface of the moon

[@bee_fearful4807]

LMAO! I was dead. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@qois_rj]

.

[@gamingthisera6339]

@Adi Adiani its 1972, what do you expect? 4k with hq sounds recorder?

[@gamingthisera6339]

@Adi Adiani which version are you talking about? There is a alot of Charlie Chaplin version, remastered where the quality were alot better, you can also find a better footage about the moon landing on KZbin

[@jlh4jc]

9:56 "I was strolling on the Moon one day, in the very very month of May/December". It was like Cernan and Schmidt were a couple of good friends having fun on the town. They did extraordinary things in space, but deep down they were folks like us.

[@efremtommasi1387]

The footage about landing and leaving from the moon view has been filmed by an important alien director, the same who directed the alien movie "Human vs Predator"

[@antoniorangel9784]

So it’s fake

[@Visonvibes]

No they don’t have footage of them leaving so they used another one...... brain dead

[@thegreatdivide825]

@@antoniorangel9784 No it's not fake, he's just full of shit

[@Buckxxxxxx1]

They left the moon with the rainbow accelerator booster. Glad they had bluetooth from the moon back to earth for the videos.

[@YDDES]

@@Buckxxxxxx1What makes You think they would have needed bluetooth to transmitt radio signals???

[@dejanhaskovic5204]

Oh god, i get so frustrated when i see "Where are the stars?" comments...

[@blakesnipe5347]

I'd bet that AT LEAST 95% of the people making that comment are trolls.

[@backstabber765]

The rocket flies above the clouds, then levels out when you can no longer see it, then lands... How do you people believe this "footage." 2:55 has to be my favourite. At 8 minutes leave the video at double speed. There was no moon landing. I can't believe the intellect of this generation.

[@dejanhaskovic5204]

Julian S I dont get it. Why do you think its impossible to go to the Moon? Second, rockets *never* fly on cloudy day. Third, in order to get into orbit, you must turn and burn towards the horizon if you want to pull the orbit out. If you are such and expert in debunking nasa, you need to be introduced with basics of orbital mechanics in order to judge what is legit and what not. Since you dont research anything, i consider you as a troll.

[@blakesnipe5347]

james dean You would have to deliberately avoid seeking an answer to your question to have never heard it explained. The reason is a matter of exposure. To capture star light, the film/sensor must be exposed to the scene for 15-20 seconds. This is known as a shutter speed and is a MINIMUM for capturing star light. However, for the lunar photographs (and photos of the Earth from the ISS), the subjects are large and brightly lit by the sun, so to properly expose those subjects, a much shorter shutter speed is necessary. 15 full seconds is FAR too long an exposure. For the Apollo Lunar photographs, exposures between 1/60th and 1/250th of a second were used. Since at least 15 full seconds of exposure is required to capture star light on film, you should be able to imagine that an exposure of 1/60th of a second is far too short an exposure to capture star light. So, the very fact that the lunar surface is properly exposed tells anyone familiar with photography - and specifically exposure - that the settings prohibit star light from.showing up. They COULD take photos of stars from the ISS on the dark side of Earth (and they do - just not many). The problem is again - they need 15-20 seconds of exposure and the ISS is in orbit - so the stars move a lot relative to the orientation of the camera in that time. It's difficult, so a lot of the photos of stars you get from the ISS are star trails - for this very reason. There is no reason to attempt to take quality pictures of the stars from the ISS when things like Hubble exist. Hubble can take far better pictures because it is designed to take pictures. Ts designed to take its own orbit around Earth into account to track and maintain focus on a partuclar area of the sky. That's literally Hubble's job. When you have that, taking photographs from the ISS is more for artistic purposes than scientific.

[@rockwoodcomic]

Go outside at night with your iPhone. Take a picture of a streetlight with the stars in the background. Now count the visible stars in your picture. There won't be any. The camera exposes for the streetlight (the rocket) and in doing so, the faint stars are too dim to appear. This is basic photography.

[@KevinMurphy0403]

Fantastic. Incredible achievement and the icing on the cake of manned lunar exploration.

[@appletongallery]

The icing on the cake- Like been there, done that? Imagine if the world acted that way after the Wright Brothers got their plane off the ground. Gee guys - been there done that no need to ever get a plane off the ground again- “icing on the cake”!

[@davidlafleche1142]

@@appletongalleryManned space travel is pointless at best and an act of rebellion against God at worst.

[@YDDES]

If You look thorougly, the camera is often "left behind" when the astronauts move. Sometimes the camera operator knew in advance in which direction they would move and could start the panning in time. When he followed the LM's lift off, he knew exactly when the count down should reach "zero" and started the tilt up about a second in advance.

[@personalg3754]

All that 50 years ago 😂😂😂

[@YDDES]

@@personalg3754 Were You even around 50 years ago, so You know anything about What they could do in that time? I was.

[@personalg3754]

@@YDDES yes, I was

[@YDDES]

@@personalg3754 Well, Then You should know they were quite advanced in that time too and just as intelligent that we are today.

[@personalg3754]

@@YDDES I know all this crap is fake. I served in Desert Storm, Iraqi Freedom and years as a DOD contractor in Afghanistan. Trust me, I know what kind of fiction our government comes up with. Time is catching up with the lies but all involved will be dead.

[@dan_rad]

"I hope I'm living when we leave this solar system on a venture to find another planet earth"... Nearly 50 years ago :(

[@alexanderleto7287]

As a Scientist I believe we will not leave the solar system in 50 years. Maybe we reach Mars but more will not be possible

[@YDDES]

@@alexanderleto7287 Agree.

[@dincadan78]

Very impressive movie. It is a pity that no other expeditions for the Moon have took place since then :( But we must remain optimistic for the Mars landing.

[@BCO216]

The only real comment on this bs Hollywood movie. My question is 1, where did the rover come from. 2, the moon landing capsule is totally different from the earth landing capsule?? 3, where is all the fuel stored. 3, why hasn't anyone in earth been back to the moon????

[@thegreatdivide825]

@@BCO216 Google has more friends than you

[@BCO216]

@Terrence Owen government Google been lying to gullible people for decades. At some point QandA's need to be answered to support stories being told. Many countries were racing to get to the moon, and US wanted/needed to be first by all means necessary.

[@redabdab]

@@BCO216oh wow! I had always believed this up to now, but your brilliant and well-informed analysis has completely changed my mind. You have demolished all the so-called experts and I can only assume you must be the most intelligent person ever to walk the earth

[@darthos6257]

​@@BCO216 I'd like to think there's no such thing as a stupid question, but all of yours seem to tow that line. 1. The rover was slung and folded against the side of the descent stage. It's very small in comparison to the lander. 2. The Lunar Module was designed for exactly that; to land astronauts on the Moon. It lacks sufficient thermal shielding to enter Earth's atmosphere; the Command Module was what the Apollo astronauts used to re-enter the atmosphere, attached to the Service Module which separates just before re-entry. 3. Fuel is stored in several tanks inside the descent and ascent stages. They're hidden from view. 4. NASA's funding peaked in 1966 but fell year after year following, especially after Apollo 11. It was decided that Skylab and the Space Shuttle would be better value for money, which is why the final missions were postponed and then cancelled. Apollo's 18 & 19 were cancelled in 1970 due to the aforementioned budget cuts, and the Saturn V rocket that was to take Apollo 20 to the Moon was reassigned as the launcher for Skylab. Going to the Moon was expensive, and required a lot of political will, as well as considerably risk to men and machine. Why return to the Moon when probes and landers could get there a lot cheaper?

[@Black-Maple]

Most Amazing and epic human adventure. Will be like a kid until my death when i look at this.. thanks for that.

[@ohger1]

Bedtime for us was 8 pm. Mom let me stay up and watch Apollo 11 live. I'll never forget that.

[@gumpyflyale2542]

Its been over 47 years and counting no one has left LEO since December 1972 and no one ever will because we have been lied to for over 50 years

[@NoelistAvenger]

@@gumpyflyale2542 No conspiracy of that magnitude could possibly hold up for over 50 years. Bill Clinton couldn't get blowjobs from an intern without the whole world knowing about it one year later, but the US would've been able to fake SIX multi-billion dollars moon missions involving hundreds of thousands people, tricking not only their own polation but also every single other nation in the world ? Come on...

[@PradeepGupta-ku2sr]

If possible moon should be revisited. It will keep the world busy. Also some new technologies may emerge. the world will find a purpose.

[@PradeepGupta-ku2sr]

moon has been demystefied. science has won.

[@anatomycat98]

I can't even imagine how awesome it would have been like to be one of the guys who walked on the moon.

[@Legorreta.M.D]

I would imagine O2 must deplete incredibly quickly with the toddler like excitement

[@certainpointofview3860]

Become a Freemason and maybe you can.

[@queenbabymama5635]

Nobody walked on the moon🤓

[@ChrisPBacon777]

@@queenbabymama5635 actually, quite few people walked on the moon. You seem to think there was only one moon mission, but there were several.

[@ChrisPBacon777]

@@certainpointofview3860 what percentage of total freemason membership got to walk on the moon? What exactly are my chances?

[@trapper439]

Schmitt sounds so happy and confident on the descent, calling Cernan "Gene-o" etc. The guy was obviously having a blast the whole time, trusting in their training and really enjoying himself during the epic event of his life. Awesome.

[@Serhya]

he's confident because it's bullshit

[@aussiefan354]

@@Serhya It is absolutley fake

[@rewdwarf123]

@@aussiefan354 Well, you've got to admire them for keep doing that funny walk for several hours a day.

[@Bibiisachildkiller]

Yeah he was having a blast lying to millions of people, do you consider that "awesome"?

[@ssqxw5564]

They cleaned the studio very well spotless

[@killgazmotron]

such a positive attitude the whole time, joking around etc. Cant help but think i would be in a constant state of tense paranoia of something going wrong. Balls of steel.

[@appletongallery]

Balls of deception more like it. They were sitting around in Arizona.

[@marshallcello1128]

They did have balls of steel, but they also trained their asses off. They were prepared.

[@appletongallery]

@@marshallcello1128 They we’re actors. This was a ho*ax.

[@TourOfTorun]

Try watching some of the videos taken from the lunar rover - it drives for a long towards the distant mountains whih you claim to be backdrops, and they come no nearer or change in perspective, proving they're many miles away. In addition, many stereo-pair images were taken, which show that the landscape is exactly what is seems: vast. If there was a backdrop 100 feet away, stereo pairs would show it up immediately.

[@gianfranco_maldetto_92]

The true color of lunar surface is pink, not grey. Wake up!

[@nasaskywatcher5200]

Apollo 17 was the eleventh manned space mission in the NASA Apollo programme. It was the first night launch of a U.S. human spaceflight and the sixth and final lunar landing mission. The mission was launched at 12:33 a.m. EST on 7 December 1972, and concluded on December 19. One of the last two men to set foot on the Moon was also the first scientist-astronaut, geologist Harrison ("Jack") Schmitt. While Evans circled in America, Schmitt and Cernan collected a record 109 lb (49 kg) of rocks during three Moonwalks. The crew roamed for 34 km (21 mi) through the Taurus-Littrow valley in their rover, discovered orange-colored soil, and left the most comprehensive set of instruments in the ALSEP on the lunar surface. Their mission was the last in the Apollo lunar landing missions. The last 4 Apollo craft were used for the three Skylab missions and the ASTP, mission in 1975.

[@Anxian]

There's a mirror on the surface of the Moon (Lunar Laser Ranging experiment) that we can point a laser at and measure it's distance from us. If we didn't go there, how the hell did that get there?

[@pornstarnarek]

The sand on the moon are like glass shards, so maybe it formed naturally

[@RobertPlattBell]

Do not feed the trolls

[@randymarshole]

There's also some man made shit on Mars yet no human has stepped on it's surface but I still believe man has walked on the moon.

[@robotguy4]

Robotic landing craft. However, there's a better piece of evidence that doesn't require any technical knowledge: The Russians didn't call bullshit. I mean, if the moon landing was faked, they probably would have known. The USSR had an unmanned spacecraft in lunar orbit at the time and probably had KGB spies infiltrating the US government and its allies (at least in British intelligence. See Oxford Five).

[@RobertPlattBell]

robotguy4 Exactly.

[@Momo-bb2fn]

15:46 what a dream... one much more tangible back then, being that we hadn’t even sent *anything* to space a decade before going to the moon. Almost half a century later and we haven’t even gone back.

[@Momo-bb2fn]

We’ve had great advances, don’t get me wrong, but imagine what would be if America still had that fervor for space, one fueled by curiosity and a spirit of exploration, rather than a Cold War

[@rockethead7]

@@Momo-bb2fn Yeah. But, very few people want to fork over their money for so few people to be able to do those explorations. For example, it took a dictatorship to fund Magellan's voyage around the world, because if left up to the general populous, they wouldn't have wanted to pay for it. Even Magellan's own country's king (Portugal) didn't want to pay for it, and that's why Magellan ended up being paid by Spain's king instead. And, Magellan's voyage costed nowhere near Apollo, not by a long shot, not even close. And, that was for hundreds of people to go, and lasted three years. Apollo costed orders of magnitude more, and only resulted in 12 men walking on the moon for a few hours each. Yeah, you're right, the cold war produced that, while we are left only imagining what would happen if the public funded things like that purely for the sake of curiosity. We, as a species, don't tend to do that very much. Most of the time, we fund voyages that we ourselves can go on. We very rarely dump that level of money, funding from hundreds of millions of people, into voyages that only a dozen people get to make. You're right, it is a bit of a shame. But, that's the reality about humanity.

[@Momo-bb2fn]

@@rockethead7 exactly, only I’d change ur second sentence to “very few want to fork over their money for _exploration_ “ In my mind, people going on explorations is hardly even part of the question. I’m more referring to the technology, which in itself is an exploration, one people don’t appreciate. As u said, such is humanity

[@queenbabymama5635]

With all our advanced technology and NASA they would have gone back had they went at all. This is so fake. I do not believe they walked on the moon. This is Hollywood.

[@justinmadrid8712]

Watch the video footage of this take-off from the camera inside the LM. Watch it side-by-side with this take-off. It does not match at all. When the LM performs ‘pitch over’, absolutely no pitch over can be seen in the video from within the LM. “Surely a mistake like this would be front page news!” Nope, the Moon landings are perhaps the biggest real life example of the ‘Emperor has no no clothes’.

[@MrVonKruger]

Just awesome... Can't wait to watch the new Orion launch, that's going to be some show.

[@jagosingh85]

Wow!!! A night launch of the Saturn!! What an amazing sight.

[@Wet_Deer]

I love how happy they were to be on the moon

[@gustav_ostervall_92]

I love how unhappy they were in conjunction with the interviews afterwards. After all, lying to the overall population sure takes its toll.

[@lulupinkus5627]

Happy to be in a studio, dummie

[@EuanWhitehead]

@@gustav_ostervall_92 Yea must have been pretty tough for the USSR to lie about it for their enemies protection too. And China... and India... and every other country too...

[@sinenkaari5477]

Moonlanding is one of those things i can't decide in my head do i believe it or not, there's so many things that are off about it like the black space without stars and that interview where they are almost scared for their life. In this video by the end i can see one time it looks like the guy is hanging out there with his helmet open couse his face is showing. I don't think it would be impossible to go there so did they fake the footage only? Those "simulation" s on the TV station are pretty close to the thing seen in the supposed real footage. This thing remains mystery to me at this point.

[@STS-Dreamer]

@@gustav_ostervall_92so this is a video of Apollo 17, and you’re referring to a single picture from after Apollo 11 which really isn’t the smoking gun you think it is. oh the guys who just went through a very exhausting mission aren’t sitting like cheerleaders with fake smiles plastered on their faces 24/7? must be fake

[@furerorban1488]

It was nice to relive a moment that I shared with my family years ago. My dad saw to it that we were interested in the things that went on around us. At that age...I would have missed it had it not been for him and my mom!❤

[@Javier23gol]

9:56 Damn I feel a little jealousy cause they were having an awesome time on the moon. I would love to feel that experience.

[@apxpandy4965]

+Javier Torres Just go outside and jump around - that's what the astronauts did!

[@TheBeresford7]

Get someone to attach a wire to you above you on a scaffold, go out at night to the desert paint the sand. That's how Nasa did it basically.

[@apxpandy4965]

There's a lot of people on these pages that wanna attach a wire to my neck and then attach it to a scaffold! But you're right - there's plenty of nasa footage showing them using wire suspended activity. Strange how not too many can make the correlation between nasa showing them what they did and the later footage that pretends to be on the moon.

[@nebtheweb8885]

You have obviously never been to a launch. Thats a lot of power. Why waste a perfectly good rocket just to make you pendejos think it was real? As for the moon shots, well there were no wires. At 1/6th the gravity of the earth even carrying 300 pounds on a 200 pound man amounts to about 83 pounds total. On earth it would be 500 pounds. But then again I am a little prejudiced because I have had the pleasure of meeting Harrison Hagan "Jack" Schmitt, the American geologist, retired NASA astronaut, university professor and former U.S. senator from New Mexico when he was Senator here. My brother was the the lucky one though as he actually worked for the man for a few years after his astronaut days. You might want to pick up one of his books to read when you are not trolling Utube looking for trouble.

[@apxpandy4965]

Oh Boy! You must be a s'thick as a brick? I mean, what's wrong with your brain? Why would going to the moon suddenly make you 'slow down'? Any idiot knows that agility in movement is all about 'power-to-weight' - and yet your own figures show that even suited up, and astronaut is only going to weight around 1/3 as much as he would on earth. So wouldn't that make him more agile? But then, I guess, if you're an idiot, why would you ever reach that conclusion? You're (obviously) also so stupid, yo haven't seen the reduced-gravity simulations that nasa did, way before they ever launched anyone. That footage shows quite clearly that what you're saying is utter bullshit! All that makes me wonder - are you from the moon? A brain made for the moon would slow down somewhat when re-located to earth. Sounds like you?

[@TrTV7]

8:48 the cutest thing i ever seen :3

[@YeetDisDude]

thats a astronaut struggling for hid life, if he fell hard he'd die on the moon

[@palyze]

its not cute lol, falling on the moon is extremely dangerous

[@TheLondonCyclist]

His wire kept him up slightly.

[@moritz7613]

@@TheLondonCyclist you know that moon gravity is 9 times less than earths gravity. this means btw you fall 9 times slower

[@TheLondonCyclist]

@@moritz7613 Did you know I'm superman?

[@RhodriSmith]

"May is the month of the year!" Those chums are delighted to be on the moon.

[@jacob5728]

Wow, about hit 50 years anniversary. An amazing feat showing that humans can achieve the impossible

[@freddybob807]

Yup. Unfortunately that poor camera guy who filmed them leaving is still there on the moon. We should celebrate him.

[@carlkinder8201]

@@freddybob807 lol, you must think that every drone has a tiny person inside operating the camera.

[@freddybob807]

@@carlkinder8201 And you must think whatever your masters tell you to think.

[@carlkinder8201]

@@freddybob807 I believe what science and education tell me to believe. You believe what an uneducated failed cab driver (Bart Sibrel) tells you to believe.

[@Lowonfuel]

​@@freddybob807 You can hear them at NASA talking what they'll do next as they turn that camera lens down, to a side, etc. In the Apollo 14 video you can hear the camera handler (by RC) say he will turn the camera off. Most of you unbelievers seem to think that Remote Control was unknown at the time.

[@lyon406]

10:22 The earth and stars

[@topg7290]

lyon406 nice to see the earth from a other planet

[@user-ms3jo1zh2k]

Faaaaaakeeeee lol

[@eniix4681]

@@user-ms3jo1zh2k Not you idiotic kids again...

[@factodark5076]

@@user-ms3jo1zh2k moron

[@maurisola]

La cámara no está ajustada

[@Relativisticism]

On apollo 17 they were 16 silver oxide-zinc cells. The power head operated around 430 watts. The handle contained the battery pack which could be removed from the power head but also the handle pack and power head could be removed together to allow for additional drill stems to be attached to allow for the desired depth to be achieved. The power head would then be re-attached and drilling would continue.

[@a.kworld2486]

😊😊

[@a.kworld2486]

😊😊

[@eliaspeter7689]

People commenting stupid fake things: *You know I'm something of a scientist myself.*

[@damachine3]

10:08 "May is the year of the month." Oxygen running low...get back inside!

[@smoke4852]

...i-

[@notincaps]

@@smoke4852 penis penis 123

[@smoke4852]

@@notincaps wtf

[@raskolndimitri6527]

@@smoke4852 raskoln dimitri love you

[@tomjohnson7529]

45 years ago today Challenger landed. RIP Gene and Apollo. I know you really did it. Tell the story Senator Schmitt.

[@theianova9856]

Un beau montage de cinéma ,tous mes compliments.

[@ericdu6499]

Le plus grand mensonge de l'humanité surtout. Le drapeau qui flotte au vent . Plus c'est gros mieux ça passe. La reconnaissance faciale vient de mettre à jour le montage bois ,aluminium de cette mascarade. C'est le serpent qui se mort la queue .

[@1arritechno]

Apollo 17 was the last mission to the Moon ; at the time, no one would have thought that most of the staff at NASA, would have passed on from old age ; waiting for another Moon mission. The question is whether we see it return in our life time ?

[@pipercub123456]

IMO Moon travel will certainly happen in 5 years at most...can you say China..Russia ..and India...or possibly a company located in private industry but ...I seriously doubt if the USA nation as a whole..will return to the Moon during the lifetime of anyone now living who is past the age of 20

[@1arritechno]

pipercub123456 Within five years to the next Moon landing ? I wish you were right, although it maybe attempted, the chance of success is extremely unlikely. Rocket science on the scale of the Saturn 5 is so often taken for granted today ! F1 is still the most powerful built, the most reliable rocket and it made the Apollo program a success. Records show: everything else has been either too small or fails during test ; all the rest is just theory ! Once we witness some large rocket launch into the heavens ; "only then" a landing will be within 5 years at most....

[@danacostello5908]

We destroyed the technology and erased the tapes. It was a bad memory I guess.

[@NzJohny]

​@@pipercub123456this aged well ;)

[@gianfranco_maldetto_92]

Sure! Wake up, sheep.

[@jesoby]

Imagine how exciting landing on Earth would be if you had only lived on the moon.

[@YDDES]

Yeah! You would be crawling like an amoeba in the gravity, that is 6 times what you were used to...

[@arcosprey4811]

@@YDDES actually its about 1.6x Moons gravity not 6x

[@YDDES]

@@arcosprey4811 Moons gravity is 6 times weaker than Earths . Nothing else.

[@DeweyTucker]

The moon landings are as valid as the theories of gravity.

[@DeweyTucker]

ThePariss333 Yep

[@DeweyTucker]

ThePariss333 are you the humanoid?

[@DeweyTucker]

ThePariss333 more than you. It is hard to read your poorly constructed sentences. One can only imagine the thought processes behind them. They are a glimpse of a chaotic mind at work. Run back home to big brother.

[@DeweyTucker]

ThePariss333 I agree with you, you are sorry. You want to call people humanoids and then whine and cry foul when that term is applied to you. I know where you are located by what is coming from you. I agree that you are not a humanoid, but a hemorrhoid.

[@marcoaurelio9527]

19:43 Who filmed this part?

[@serhatlindemann4327]

It is a robot camera controlled from the earth

[@sergiolandz6056]

@@serhatlindemann4327 and yet we cant even get clear signal for a cell phone here on earth.... mhmmm you gotta be guillible and naiive to believe this.

[@gumpyflyale2542]

@@sergiolandz6056 its anolog which explains everything if your a boomer

[@trinivagrant]

No can answer as this is all not real. We would have thousands of hours of actual space footage if we had capability to do that

[@lucabrasi5070]

Randy James , thanks for being that one idiot . Your village misses you, go back to it.

[@fazejax5255]

This is probably my favorite Apollo mission because it was so funny

[@OuterSpaceandTimelapses4]

Today’s the 50th anniversary of the Apollo 17 lunar landing!

[@abdalmh977]

😂😂

[@chetanphoenix]

Lol it's so funny when the astronaut fell down at 8:52

[@RevolverAnthology]

+Chetan Bhadrashette yeah, shame it was on earth !

[@Dreadpirateflappy]

+Ackyman that's it... ignore all the evidence and proof, just show your ignorance instead.

[@RevolverAnthology]

+Monkeybox Gaming proof? Ha ha ha. When they going back again did you say?

[@Angelkid190]

Ackyman Naw silly, it was actually in space. Lol

[@ctrlaltrepeat245]

Weell despite the entire, if he fell on a rock his suit would tear up causing him to slowley be deprived of oxygen

[@mynamenotimportant7784]

how did they fit the rover on such a small module ?

[@willoughbykrenzteinburg]

How big do you think the rover is? It fit because it fit.

[@mynamenotimportant7784]

but why isn't there footage of them assembling it? they land, then......its there. and did they have time to pack it up? I have seen rover (actual one, not replicated) exhibited on display before.......

[@timulbrich954]

Mynamenotimportant the lrv, the lunar roving vehicle, was actually folded into a small space, they opened a hatch on the lander and took it out by hand, its actual weight on the moon was about 35 kilograms, so it was no Problem at all

[@mtmindtoo7669]

Mynamenotimportant Hi, here's some footage of the rover being deployed on the moon; /watch?v=-ShauSWcTC4 And here's the procedure being tested on earth; /watch?v=ObEjEEfnBj8 I hope that helps.

[@TerryBadger]

***** Typical NASA

[@freddyferrillo9704]

At 1:38 When he goes, "Houston we're right in the middle of a snowstorm", notice all the orbs moving in random direction. He was speaking in code.

[@liamnitro2707]

What do you mean

[@thealt1375]

I would love to see the earth from the moon. Just looking at the blue marble in the sky.

[@dotdot607]

Space*

[@thealt1375]

@@dotdot607 . It takes a while before you can completely see the earth

[@Gen3Benz]

You can tell they are nearly floating with the low moon gravity. 100% real.

[@valentinotera3244]

Dust properties prove it 100%.

[@gustav_ostervall_92]

Actually, they doctored the recording of the "astronaut" walking in terms of changing the video to slow-motion. In normal speed, the astronauts are seen walking or running, and the prevalence of gravity becomes all to clear.

[@mike.j3913]

😂🤣

[@jack-nicholson1470]

In the 2019 it's ridiculous

[@fitdogStudios]

Could I suggest flat earthers plan a scientific mission to the underside of the earth.

[@ghostwhite1648]

How about allocating some of NASAs 18+b$ budget towards it... oh yeah all you get it cut and edited videos still bro.

[@MattExzy]

@@ghostwhite1648 Flat Earthers don't even know their own underside from their mouths. That's why they dribble so much shit.

[@juliaread2003]

Ghost White. Not a good enough argument that it was fake. It happened a long time ago and at the time this was going to be a continuous project. Lack of enthusiasm by the public, Funding and more important and pressing issues on planet earth put an end to space exploration for the time being.. Blimey in those 50 years the importance of keeping the video safe and in its entirety perhaps as the years went by didn't seem as important. The BBC insanley taped over their coverge of the 69 moon landing because video was expensive and had to be reused. People do stupid things, but you don't need to make a conspiracy out of it.

[@daniellanyi8287]

No just tell them to travel around the Earth genius

[@andrewmossop6547]

@@juliaread2003 read what you wrote haha

[@letmejustdoit]

No continuous shot of the landing or departure from the moon. Both cameras look away or went black at the exact moment. Why?

[@letmejustdoit]

Same take off footage of the Apollo 12 mission, but surprisingly this is a lower quality version.

[@rockethead7]

@@letmejustdoit Yeah, it's weird that the editors of this documentary didn't just use the Apollo 17 footage for this Apollo 17 video. But, then again, this is why I tend not to watch documentaries that are subject to bad editing. I usually just go to the original source material.

[@letmejustdoit]

@Cliff Yablonski You gotta come here calling me names when I'm just asking perfectly reasonable questions? Are you an ignorant "fuctard" yourself? When did I say or even implied the moon missions were fake? The footage leaves suspicions, that's it.

[@willoughbykrenzteinburg]

@@letmejustdoit meanwhile, other hoaxers argue that it is fake because the liftoff footage from Apollo 17 is too good to be real. At some point, you fellas ought to get together and get your stories straight.

[@franomarku7754]

50 years ago you could fly 400,000 km to the moon. only 400 km today. really sad

[@ChrisPBacon777]

That has absolutely zero to do with ability. It's amazing that there are still people who think that somehow the ability to fly the moon has been 'lost' somehow. Sad²

[@trinivagrant]

It has to do with it being a hoax. Its a money grab for a group of hijackers. Take a few business classes and learn about 2008 crash and how these guys pull of these scams. Its a ponzi scheme Thats why no commercial flight exists , you or anyone you know has ever been in orbit, why ISS story makes little sense and has no video of the actual construction from beginning module in orbit at 27,000km an hour, and why no videos of anything in orbit exist other than fake iss shotz. We have pictures of ISS in orbit , where are the hours of third party video footage of ISS in orbit

[@scottnukend]

@@trinivagrant Apollo 11 does have video from the command ship view of the lunar rover landing.

[@trinivagrant]

@@scottnukend I would compare space to underwater. In the 60s went hundreds of thousands of KM to visit the moon. At this point 60 years later with trillions spent I imagine if adjust inflation and add all space programs it's odd there is hardly any videos in space showing the splendors of space like the millions of minutes of underwater footage available. Satellites also supposedly have camera capabilities for spy reasons and tens of thousands in existence and there is less than 5 minutes of satellites in orbit and all the splendors of space.

[@pasch1mw]

I remember watching these blastoffs. God, how exciting they were.

[@appletongallery]

That’s about the achievement of it- get the rocket off the ground and out of detection with the naked eye. The rest of Apollo was filmed on earth.

[@rewdwarf123]

@@appletongalleryThe naked eye isn't that good for detecting things. Lots of people have to wear glasses!

[@gmnboss]

@@appletongallery lol

[@PatrickLensch]

They behaved exact the way I would do on moon because: YOLO 🙃

[@rameshchinnasandra9115]

This is movie

[@PatrickLensch]

@@rameshchinnasandra9115 maybe, science fiction ...

[@brightlight3520]

Why did the camera pan down just as he was going into the hatch? Was he too small to fit?

[@rockethead7]

When are you talking about? Timestamp? And, how can he be too small to fit? I wouldn't even understand what that would mean.

[@dansv1]

@@rockethead7 18:57 Hey, I have a question for you. What type of display was the large screen used in mission control during Apollo 11 when they first viewed the EVA on the lunar surface?

[@dansv1]

Ok I just found the answer. Writing the question in the comment gave me the right words to put into a google search. Eidophor rear projection screen. ArsTechnica has a very good article titled Apollo Flight Controller 101: Every console explained.

[@rockethead7]

@@dansv1 No idea. Sorry.

[@cvnavolus5]

why is the video quality so poor?

[@swinger2]

bruh this was 1972 and even that they had to get cameras that can withstand the pressure of the trip

[@momohead2798]

It’s amazing how they can’t get back but they got there in 1972

[@celticfreemason9721]

Momohead That's funny... They have a projected manned Lunar mission for 2024. Research !!!

[@celticfreemason9721]

@Please Complete All Fields do you just chime in yet know nothing about the subjects you chime in on? There is literally Millions of tons of vast resources, such as but not limited to, H3, water ice, the need for solar expansion, ECT. Come on guys, research!

[@celticfreemason9721]

@Please Complete All Fields again. Do some research. Maybe you won't sound like you don't understand why we need to go back.

[@celticfreemason9721]

@Please Complete All Fields that's a sign of intelligent research, I may have pegged you wrong mate. Good show

[@RealClassyStudios]

Momohead They’re already planning a fucking mission Dumbass. The main reason they went was to beat the Soviet Union there in the space race. Truly another dumbass who’s just fucking jealous they wasted their lives unlike the people who actually landed.

[@heinoheme1178]

Actually, Apollo 11 was close to an abort of the landing. They were nearly out of descent fuel when they landed. The autopilot was steering them into a boulder field and Armstrong had to take manual control, and steer the LM to a viable landing site. When they were preparing to ascend, they discovered that a switch, vital to arming the ascent engine had been broken, and Armstrong had to poke a pen into the hole where the switch had been. Otherwise they would have been stuck on the moon.

[@arcosprey4811]

Of all switches that could break lol

[@MattyEngland]

Cool story bro

[@thegreatdivide825]

@@MattyEngland Did you understand any of it?

[@thegreatdivide825]

@@bennyskim Well you've got an F in your report and that pretty much sums up your life as well

[@remoteviewer777]

why is the NASA logo muddy. is it a sticker on the lens, (mirrored) or is it pasted after the shooting. ?????

[@SR71ABCD]

*Apollo 17* : That's that and were done! *Artemis 1* : Hold My Beer, were going back!

[@appletongallery]

Also Artemis- “it will take us another 30 years because space flight is hard”.

[@deltaiii3158]

You are going nowhere buddy. First "real" moon mission not before 2040 and first human on mars not before 2100

[@longlivetheking1065]

@@deltaiii3158 moon landing was real, cope

[@mlasko74]

The first astronauts had unbelievably solid nuts! 😀

[@antoniorangel9784]

Poklando he rediscovered it lol, never seen someone glorify Columbus so much lol

[@wadejustanamerican1201]

This is Awesome I don't know why people would say it's fake. It's just a sham people don't believe. If they just would open their eyes they could see the bigger picture.

[@kingpabsgaming8156]

Not your eyes you need to open, it's your mind.

[@450farf]

@@kingpabsgaming8156and their eyes cause this sh1t fake af

[@nicholaseachus5937]

Yeah crazy people don't believe the government. They are always so honest.

[@inlee99]

Just curious, who was zooming/panning the camera at the time ?.. Was it being controlled from the earth?..

[@LL-fb8wz]

Yes it was being controlled from NASA and was attached to the rover. Here is what I found...NASA communicated with the Apollo missions primarily through a system called the "Unified S-band" which allowed for voice communication, television transmission, telemetry, tracking, and ranging all through a single system, utilizing a network of large antennas around the globe to receive signals from the spacecraft on the Moon; this network was managed by the Goddard Space Flight Center.

[@dub2459]

People be like "where are all the stars" and I be like "it's day time,the moon just doesn't have a blue sky"

[@AustinALiboiron]

Because the cameras are set to expose the lunar surface, which is so bright that in order to show any detail, the cameras need to be set very very dark. If you were standing there and you looked up, your eyes would adjust and you would see everything

[@sergiolandz6056]

@@AustinALiboiron i dont know at the press conference one said yes and the other said no... so yeah fck them liars !!

[@gianfranco_maldetto_92]

Stars should be visible in daytime on atmosphere-less Earth, as well. Your counter argument is actually borderline idiotic and self-defeating.

[@dragonball-hs4is]

Já pensou uma missão dessas hoje exibida em HD?

[@sheetalagarwalla1241]

The answer is Artemis mission my friend coming soon from 2024

[@djblazept]

pois, nunca aconteceu..

[@abdalmh977]

​@@djblazeptنعم لم يخرج احد من الارض

[@abdalmh977]

​@@sheetalagarwalla1241لم يخرج احد من هذه الارض ولم ذهبوا للقمر

[@heyneken2156]

"Apollo Program" Producer: Walt Disney deceased at that time. Co-producer: Wernher Von Braun. Director: Stanley Kubrick Art Director: John Hoesli. Writer: Arthur C Clarke. Photographer: Geoffrey Unsworth. Total cost = 169.51 billion current dollars..... Something very logical is that the Apollo missions were carried out in the 🌎because if it had been true that NASA in 1962 sent its first astronaut into space, taking just "6" years to take them to the 🌙 because in 1968 they orbited it, in 1969 they walked on it , in 1972 they were for the last time, bone today "50" years later at least we were vacationing in the 🌒 and traveling to Mars.

[@YDDES]

Heyneken2156. Liar.

[@YDDES]

heyneken2156 What was Kubrick ”directing”? What the different instruments in the modules were supposed to do, or How they should move on ”Moon”? He was an expert of nothing of it.

[@damianista]

Shhhh...! The Earth is Flat! Nothing and no one can enter or leave this Kingdom...

[@YDDES]

@@damianista Except the meteorites… 🤪

[@NiagaraRaveRiders]

Walt Disney was a great story teller

[@dannydekker2773]

I'm glad to read there still Americans with good functioning brains who don't think the moon landings where fake. It gives me some hope again.

[@Jellybeantiger]

Awesome the view of the Earth,half sleeping,half awake. 10:17

[@zachecho4260]

if you speed the moon walking by x2 you just see normal people in suits running in earths atmosphere

[@ArnoldsGaming]

uh okay?

[@rawnac5036]

you are correct ...i still think all was fake

[@YDDES]

But the arms and legs move all to fast and jerky…

[@maurisola]

but there is no evidence, instead for the trip to the moon there are 400,000

[@greatsilentwatcher]

@southport97 those rocks actually offered a lot of information about the geologic composition of the moon, and the Apollo Landings program yielded a vast amount that later contributed to human space exploration like the International Space Station.

[@obamaissatan590]

This is unreal,so bravo

[@francrcg]

Apollo 11 moon landing was fake, not apollo 17

[@TheMagicalNotebook]

It’s not fake.

[@moseswashington1654]

Simply Amazing

[@MrHuNTeR_exe]

Camera man is world class with the shots.

[@sirhuddlestonfuddleston5708]

If this is all faked, why did they have so many problems? Hell, the first landing, Armstrong had to almost abort, and careen over the surface looking for a place free of boulders. Why fake that? For excitement? If so, why not fake more excitement in later missions? The point is, deniers have responses to all those questions, but their answers are simply arbitrary. They just try to stir up dust, and hope that in the cloud of speculation they generate, people will get confused, shrug, and say “I guess so.” No wonder they think NASA lies. They’re so used to telling people bullshit, they expect that all other people ALSO want to tell bullshit rather than the truth. A liar thinks everybody lies all the time. I don’t know what emotional need this solves for these people. I think they justifiably feel taken advantage of by modern commercialism, so they assume things have always been that way. Well, they weren’t. It’s hard to believe how different the world was before the internet and social media and smartphones.

[@lancegoerner1719]

Hey, go fake your own Moon landing!

[@lordcelticfrost8686]

Good words..100% true

[@theveryproudmoroccan2834]

What you say comes from your ignorance about the evidence that disproves your ridiculous allegations.

[@antonioluvara2033]

Who was recording the shuttle from the outside?

[@genesioribeiro9443]

Uma importante conquista para a humanidade, em tudo que fazemos é preciso ousadia. Parabéns!

[@gamingwithrdx5798]

My respect for the cameraman is increasing day by day

[@vcare4893]

He works in studio.

[@paithankarkaran3843]

@@vcare4893 😂😂

[@MauroYankee]

so it's more easy travel to the moon than manufacture an hd camera.

[@YDDES]

At least for the rocket engineers...

[@eventcone]

Yan It depends what you mean by an "hd" camera. Photographic film is high definition, and they had excellent film cameras.

[@germansnowman]

It doesn’t help that this video was taken from a VHS tape. If you have the chance, watch the new Apollo 11 documentary in the movie theater, it will blow your mind with the amazingly detailed 70 mm footage.

[@mauriciodenasau8243]

dumbass

[@harikishore2514]

No. It's choice and preference over other. They interested in exploration. HD camera ain't give nothing.

[@DefianceGal]

How did they get past the Van Allen Radiation Belt? (curiosity)

[@rockethead7]

By going quickly. The Van Allen belts are only fatal if you're in them for weeks. Apollo went through in a couple of hours. Also, they went around the worst parts of the belts.

[@DefianceGal]

@@rockethead7 Ok but would it cause a lot of medical problems being exposed to even some of that radiation?

[@rockethead7]

@@DefianceGal No. You start to have medical problems at around 50 RADs, a bit more serious at about 200 RADs, fatal at about 1000 RADs. The astronauts received about 1 (sometimes a bit more, sometimes a bit less, but the average was about 1).

[@DefianceGal]

@@rockethead7 ok thank you for the nice polite discussion and thank you for answering my questions. I hope you have an awesome year. :)

[@stephenpage-murray7226]

Weak radiation belt. Read James Van Allen papers. They were also through it quickly due to their speed..

[@blodbrodet]

Can`twait for the Artemis program!

[@fernandoalves67]

Lindo trabalho.

[@alenico9028]

No minuto 8:50 , um cabo puxa o astronauta para tras e ele cai. Esse cabo colocado nas costas do astronauta servia para simular os movimentos do mesmo na Lua.

[@Elimination1011]

I wonder how can people refute moon landings, whereas it had been 6 times . Then i think of flat earthers and above all those who think this gigantic, complex & delicately balanced universe came into existence by "chance"🤔

[@AMC2283]

So often people who criticize those for thinking the us government might lie about something bring up flat earth out of nowhere. Did you ever consider that they want you to to think that because the earth is round, then obviously the moon landings are real? Like if you doubt Apollo you must therefore think the earth is flat which is nonsense

[@bennyskim]

Non-religious people are now flat-earthers? Irony

[@ryanseidl100]

Because earth isnt a perfect sphere and that pass off cartoons as the real deal. The radiation would have killed them and no it's not just a matter of let's go really fast. They would have constant high level exposures. Look at the stars rotating around Polaris. Also the horizon always follows no matter how high you go

[@YDDES]

@@ryanseidl100 No, the horizon doesn’t always ”follow”. Have You never seen Pictures of the whole Earth?? There is even a picture taken by a Voyager sond, showing Earth like a Star in the distance. Please don’t be a silly flat Earther…

[@gordb.2381]

In regards to the LEM launching from Moon surface: 4 questions: 1. Please look at the titan 2 rocket launch and see the coloured exhaust. It used the exact propellant as the LEM. Tell me where the exhaust gases are? The hypergolic propellant combination of Aerozine 50 fuel and nitrogen tetroxide oxidizer 2. The remote camera would have been hard to manage with a 2.5 second delay for a signal to go from Moon - Earth and back again. How did they pan up and kept the rocket ship in the frame? 3. The astronaunts were talking and they were literally standing with in 24" of a rocket engine. kzbin.info/www/bejne/b363kGNtYqmarrs Is an example of titan taking off and the noise and exhaust that is emitted. The noise inside the pressurized cabin would be ear splitting. According to Nasa they had 5 psi pressure with 3 x oxygen. Why can we hear both astronaunts when say "pitch over" together? 4. How could they actually have managed the lift off and maintain the delicate balance while they are standing ?

[@franknorthcuttmusic]

All good questions. I think I can help with them. 1) The answer is atmospheric pressure. If you watch a Saturn V launch (using kerosene and liquid oxygen), you notice that the atmospheric pressure near the ground collimates the exhaust, but as it gets higher where the pressure is reduced, the exhaust blooms outward and the gasses become less dense. The moon is essentially a vacuum, so the exhaust, which is already nearly colorless due to the fuel used (as seen in a Titan II/Gemini launch), spreads rapidly upon leaving the nozzle, and thins out to a much greater degree, becoming all but invisible. There are a couple videos on KZbin of Titan II/Gemini launches that follow it to staging, and you can see the exhaust fade with altitude, and become nearly invisible. You’ll notice when the astronauts call out pitch-over, and the LM changes its attitude, you can see the glow of combustion, as we are looking directly into the nozzle. 2) Yes, that was tricky. They knew the time delay required due to signal propagation, the launch time, the distance from the camera to the LM, and the approximate acceleration at launch. They had to time the start and pan rate correctly. They attempted it on Apollo 15 and 16, unsuccessfully. Those videos are available as well. They pretty much got it right on A17. 3) Good question. I can only assume that there was adequate insulation through the engine housing and space suits to buffer much of the engine vibration. That would be the only source of sound, since much of the energy would be dissipated into a vacuum. Their microphones were in their helmets, directly in front of their mouths, so that would be the most direct (and highest decibel) sound that the mic would pick up. 4) I wondered this myself, until I did a little digging. If you go to this link, click on document 5; ‘Crew Personal Equipment’, and scroll to page 9, you will see the restraints that were used to stabilize them during landing, liftoff, docking, and zero-G conditions. www.nasa.gov/history/alsj/LMNewsRef-Boothman.html Hope this helps.

[@gives_bad_advice]

"The remote camera would have been hard to manage with a 2.5 second delay for a signal to go from Moon - Earth and back again. How did they pan up and kept the rocket ship in the frame?" It's almost as if they knew in advance exactly when liftoff would be, the trajectory of the vehicle, and the length of the signal delay.

[@KPL400]

@@gives_bad_advice look up Ed Fendall...

[@eventcone]

@@franknorthcuttmusic As I understand, the roar from a rocket motor that we are all familiar with comes from the interaction between the engine plume and atmosphere. No atmosphere = no sound.

[@franknorthcuttmusic]

@@eventcone you are probably correct, considering the rapid temperature and pressure changes occurring, as well as the turbulence created in the surrounding air. I would guess there may be some vibration transmitted through the engine housing into the LM, but that would probably be minimal.

[@Godscountry2732]

The Saturn V was a sight to behold,a monster of a rocket,who would of thought something that big could fly.

[@davidlafleche1142]

Manned space travel is an act of rebellion against God.

[@TourOfTorun]

You eloquent defence of your contention that the Apollo missions had a backdrop 100ft away continues to impress me.

[@svenmansfeld]

That's one small step for a man - one giant leap for Hollywood

[@apocalips8008]

and your mothers one small moment with stranger in a backstreet porn video made one giant turd of a man....

[@allgood6760]

Awesome! .. thanks from NZ 👍🇳🇿

[@thevaltierra]

Great movie. I love practical fx

[@hunsadersrockinranch]

lol, Arizona looked pretty good back then wouldn't you say?

[@YDDES]

Did Arizona really have sunlight from a black sky, back then? Don't think so...

[@hunsadersrockinranch]

YDDES It's never dark in Arizona at night! The stars are extremely bright.

[@hunsadersrockinranch]

Cliff Yablonski Guess you never seen a Hollywood back drop either.

[@YDDES]

Peter Hunsader So, in your little world, starlight casts only one, deep shadow in one direction? Also, I understand you have NO idea about how film/video effects were created back then.

[@hunsadersrockinranch]

YDDES I can just say it's not the moon they are filming from. Besides no human could go threw extreme radiation bands and survive!

[@Sorg22]

10:39 look at how they bounce. Does that look like an 80 pound man? Because that's what his weight is equal to on the moon, including his 50 pound uniform and 170 pounds in weight. If a person weighs 170 pounds on Earth, their weight on the Moon would be approximately 28.3 pounds. This is because the Moon's gravity is about 1/6th that of Earth's, so the person would experience less gravitational force, and therefore, weigh less on the Moon. If a 170-pound man wears a 50-pound uniform, his combined weight on the Moon would be approximately . This includes both his body weight and the weight of the uniform. I mean a 40 pound child here on earth doesn't bounce.

[@eventcone]

it's not just about weight. It's about acceleration due to gravity, which is also 1/6th of that on Earth. All whilst mass remains the same (as on Earth). So whenever an astronaut leaves the surface, he takes longer to come down onto it again.

[@Kat-zj5kd]

how the lunar module reattaches to the rocket/ spaceship?? just trying to learn

[@Rogbet1]

they have 2 docking ports, kind of like a phone charger that click togheter and stick

[@LL-fb8wz]

Yep then the dumped it as it was no longer needed.

[@BIGBaNANaBender]

You just gotta love the small pop of an explosion that apparently lifted them off the moon high enough to escape the moons gravity and meet up with a mother ship in the moons orbit ROFL

[@ChrisPBacon777]

The 'small pop' that you think was the actual engine was the explosive charge that released the ascent module from the whole assembly. You can't see the plume from the engine, as the fuel burned with a clear discharge.

[@450farf]

@@ChrisPBacon777lol if you believe that I got beachfront property in oklahoma to sell ya

[@ChrisPBacon777]

@@450farf if you don't understand how reality works, then that makes it clear why you think you have a beachfront property nowhere near the ocean, or why you have no clue how things work in space 🤦

[@450farf]

@@ChrisPBacon777 lol exactly. What we’re seeing in the Apollo 17 lm footage is simply a model being pulled up over a fake backdrop. It’s very cartoonish, early sci fi movie utilized same techniques. Laughable today but hey they couldn’t predict the future

[@ChrisPBacon777]

@@450farf 'lol exactly' Well, at least you agree you're clueless. I also think you need to use more 'lols'. You're not very convincing, except for how clueless you are 🤪 Maybe more lols will help.

[@radwilly1770]

RIP Gene Cernan

[@conveyor2]

Roger Clemons: Make the world a better place and go hang.

[@phillyfan3942]

13:10 change playback to 2× interesting

[@arelortal6580]

How did they maintain the crew compartment and mid section pressurised when opening the hatch to get in and out of it ?

[@rockethead7]

Over the last few years, you have gone from video to video, asking questions like this, while denying Apollo happened. All you've done is prove that your entire position comes from ignorance. "I don't know how anything worked, therefore it's fake." I've answered you over 100x for various questions like this. And, you have yet to acknowledge a single time about being wrong about ANYTHING. And, yet, here you are, still displaying that you actually don't know the first thing about how stuff worked on Apollo. If you have to ask questions about how Apollo worked, you are not in a position to deny its veracity. Sane people, on the other hand, learn how things work, THEN come to their conclusions. You (an insane person) start by denying things happened, then make it your life's mission to ask a million questions to waste people's time answering you, when you have zero intention of listening to any of the answers anyway.

[@arelortal6580]

@@rockethead7 Guess what ? Someone posted a link : lunar module - LM10 to LM14 Vehicle familiarisation manual by Grumman and pointed the section 3.7.1 in the manual Environmental Control Subsystem ( ECS ) . He answered my question simply, efficiently and he took him one posting to do it. I thank him for his help, and that was the end of it. Kick rocks

[@rockethead7]

@@arelortal6580 Yet, you used to say that those manuals don't even exist. Do you remember that?

[@arelortal6580]

@@rockethead7 well , instead of wasting your time insulting and denigrating, if you had posted the link and I had persisted with my denial, I would have been exposed, in front of the entire world, as the emperor of idiotsl. What I do remember though, is the last time I asked you about some article mentioning the apologies of the authors regarding an editing error in a documentary, where astronauts appeared in identical backgrounds as the narrator says they are in different days and locations, your reply sounded like : I ain't wasting my f*cking time searching that for you. Do you remember ? Peace.

[@rockethead7]

@@arelortal6580 No, that wasn't the last time. The last time was when you insisted a certain photograph wasn't possible (because you were too lazy to look it up), and you said you expected to see the LEM in frame in that photo, therefore you concluded that Apollo was fake. And, I looked it up for you, and the photo was taken from INSIDE THE LEM, out the window (thus, the photo was not impossible, nor would you expect to have the LEM in frame, when the astronauts took the photo from INSIDE THE LEM). And, you immediately disappeared, never to make another comment again in that thread, never admitting you were wrong, never saying another word about it. Why? Because arrogant (and ignorant) people like you are incapable of ever admitting to yourself that you're wrong about ANYTHING. As for the Apollo 16 error in the footage in the documentary, yeah, I wasn't going to waste my time on tracking down the note from the editor (or distributor, or whoever) that admitted the error made in the documentary. Why? Because, exactly as I said, it's a waste of time, because you never admit being wrong anyway. And, beyond that, who cares? It was a documentary!!! The original footage doesn't have the error!!!! So, what difference does it make that the editors of the documentary accidentally put one piece of footage where it didn't belong? All anybody needs to do is watch the original footage to know that the error wasn't there. You can't prove Apollo was fake from that. The most you'd ever prove is that the editors made a mistake when piecing together the documentary. Period. And, I pointed out to you that I could show you hundreds of examples of similar editing mistakes in documentaries about WWII, when they intermix a scene from the wrong battle into the final footage. This doesn't mean WWII was fake. It just means that there was an error in editing. But, mentally crippled people (like you) don't care about simple explanations like this. Your only agenda is to slander people. That is literally all you want to do. You don't want to really know anything about the topic. Years ago, when you started this crusade of yours to slander everyone who worked on Apollo, you literally didn't even know anything about the topic at all. You didn't know how many missions there were. You didn't know which spacecraft did what. You knew virtually nothing about Apollo, like 0.001% about what you should know. Yet, you had already concluded it was fake. Now, years later, you know about 3% about Apollo (a vast improvement over where you started, but still virtually nothing in the bigger scheme of things), and still, you have not learned to quit slandering people based on your own ignorance. Don't complain to me about "insulting and denigrating" you, while simultaneously, you've spent the last 3-4-5 years accusing thousands of people involved with Apollo of being criminals. That's just ridiculous and hypocritical. YOU are the one insulting not only the people who worked on Apollo, but you're an insult to humanity as a whole. Nobody likes people like you. Absolutely nobody.

[@afganistannotienepetroleo1271]

Impresionante ver el despegue nocturno del Saturno V. Que poder...Ese moustruo podia poner en OBT casi 120 Tn. POr otra parte, el ML que vemos despegar, tenia una llama casi sin brillo. Eso es por el tipo de combustible (es como los cohetes que queman alcohol o hidrogeno, que la llama es azul)

[@fishboy3987]

8:51 rip astronaut

[@sachinnair3927]

9:50 Haha nice work NASA film studio but did the astronaut forgot how to walk...he is clearly jumping and the video is slow motion... Try 2x and you can see it....Also here is my theory... appollo 17 launched without men . Then close to return date they launched another vessel with men for showing the landing....The majority of work was done in Probably some film studio where a not meant to be released movie named "fake moon landing" was shot

[@ChrisPBacon777]

The suits were bulky and restrictive. The astronauts couldn't move freely with them, and their movement therefore looks a bit odd. Also, jumping in a low gravity environment is a more efficient way of moving than just taking regular steps. The rest of your comment isn't even worth discussing. There is no evidence of your claim.

[@sachinnair3927]

@@ChrisPBacon777 do you have evidence 😎

[@ChrisPBacon777]

@@sachinnair3927 there are many independent resources on the internet that you can research to confirm my explanation.

[@nicholaseachus5937]

Who filmed the landing and taking off?

[@Hobbes746]

The only film of the landing was done with a 16mm film camera inside the LM. This footage obviously didn’t become available until after the mission. This camera also captured the ascent. The camera was attached to a bracket to look out the window, and it was left to run: no manual operation necessary after switching it on. The takeoff from the moon was also captured by the TV camera on the lunar rover. The LRV carried the camera on a mount that could be controlled remotely from Earth. It carried a transmitter and receiver, which had a direct link to Earth. This was used for the TV coverage of the EVAs, and for filming the takeoff.

[@yoskarokuto3553]

@@Hobbes746 LIARS!!!

[@Hobbes746]

@@yoskarokuto3553 And as usual, you present no evidence for your claims, which means the lies are all yours.

[@rhz5802]

Yes humans have landed on the moon. Yes humans have a international space station in orbit around earth. Yes we have orbiting satellites around earth. I am sickened by the fact that i have to adress these obvious facts to trolls and idiots who are probably now gonna try there hardest to prove me wrong in the comments and start whining like babies.

[@stephenpage-murray7226]

They’re uneducated and lazy. Not a good combination

[@AMC2283]

Who was president at the time and what was his nickname?

[@SantiagoVelezRestrepo]

The iss is true, more than 15 countries thanks to russia put that castle in orbit, but this is really fake, is imposible even with nowadays tech

[@ChrisPBacon777]

@@SantiagoVelezRestrepo where do you get your opinion that it is impossible, 'even with nowadays tech's from? That is complete bollocks.

[@michaelquintana157]

Ya don't forget the flat earthers

[@ligmaketchup3283]

This is awesome. Wish I could go to the moon.

[@freegee3503]

The scenes with the hills in the distance are always the same. No rough areas or craters on the hills. All smooth. 😅🤣

[@eventcone]

No. They are not.

[@freegee3503]

@@eventcone And in the other photos and videos there are craters and rough surface. This shows the surface way too smooth. 🤣😅

[@eventcone]

@@freegee3503 On the mountain slopes? But there may be a rational explanation for that. For instance, what is the ratio of mountain slope area to maria plains' area?

[@freegee3503]

@@eventcone I would hope that the rational explanation is due to lack of video quality but since it is all staged there is no hope for that.

[@freegee3503]

@@eventcone On the hill faces and in this video all of the terrain.

[@ofabc]

How did they filmed the return?