1972: Apollo 17 (NASA)

[@larrymonske8086]

I had the honor of being the first person to see Apollo 17 re-enter the atmosphere. 90 Miles off North Vietnam it looked like someone fired a missile at us. I was bridge watch on USS Saratoga. The xo came out and watched this red hot thing zoom across the sky. It took 4 hours and a call to Fleet to figure out what that was.The CO called me inside at the end of my watch. He is the one that told me that .

[@chezza81]

Larry Monske wow that’s amazing!

[@mikehunt3688]

Yeah, I’ve gotta say that’s pretty damn cool

[@pajasa62]

Larry Monske Great story....and THANKS for your service.

[@ilikecheese237]

Great story, amazing!

[@jasontipton8430]

That is so cool larry

[@jlh4jc]

9:56 "I was strolling on the Moon one day, in the very very month of May/December". It was like Cernan and Schmidt were a couple of good friends having fun on the town. They did extraordinary things in space, but deep down they were folks like us.

[@Raaaaaaahhhhhhh]

7:38 this has gotta be one of the most bruh moments in my life

[@philippelestrat3276]

"Bruh" Gene Cernan , on the surface of the moon

[@bee_fearful4807]

LMAO! I was dead. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@Z_12121]

.

[@gamingthisera6339]

@Adi Adiani its 1972, what do you expect? 4k with hq sounds recorder?

[@gamingthisera6339]

@Adi Adiani which version are you talking about? There is a alot of Charlie Chaplin version, remastered where the quality were alot better, you can also find a better footage about the moon landing on KZbin

[@efremtommasi1387]

The footage about landing and leaving from the moon view has been filmed by an important alien director, the same who directed the alien movie "Human vs Predator"

[@antoniorangel9784]

So it’s fake

[@Visonvibes]

No they don’t have footage of them leaving so they used another one...... brain dead

[@thegreatdivide825]

@@antoniorangel9784 No it's not fake, he's just full of shit

[@Buckxxxxxx1]

They left the moon with the rainbow accelerator booster. Glad they had bluetooth from the moon back to earth for the videos.

[@YDDES]

@@Buckxxxxxx1What makes You think they would have needed bluetooth to transmitt radio signals???

[@Pongant]

Watching these guys improvising and doing all kinds of stuff just shows how important human presence is for exploration...

[@rudirosti5501]

Pongant yes,billions for stupid stones!!

[@jackdull5699]

@@rudirosti5501 : Really moron? It's for scientific knowledge about the moon. We need to go back to the moon and learn more it.

[@LennyBruiser]

Jack dull “we’ve” never been there. NASa is a farce and simply a way to extract money from the people to distribute it among the elites

[@Pongant]

@@rudirosti5501 I would rather pump billions of dollars into space exploration than into an uncontrolled, tumorous capitalism as we have today...

[@trinivagrant]

Space travel doesn't exist. They said they travelled 800,000 km in the 60's. Through extreme temperatures, radiation, space debris, etc Look at how techology like virtual reality evolved from pong around 60's. We went 800,000 km to moon supposedly 5 times 55 years ago We cant do it anymore? We cant even get commercial flights 100km into orbit? We have 10,000 satellites and no videos of them in orbit? 0 for 10,000? We can build an ISS that has no construction videos exactly proving the theoretical into the actual? 0 minutes of actual construction out of over millions of minutes of construction Showing us how modules were tracked in those conditions and how astronauts linked to modules and built sealant valves in vaccum like conditions etc There are third party pictures of iss but no videos showing the iss, planet, stars? 0 hours out of thousands of hours?

[@larrymanning5925]

I've lived on the space coast all my life and I'm almost 50. Those night launches are truly spectacular. I've seen so many launches, but the night ones are the most memorable.

[@enzopasquini1931]

Gli arrivi invece sono più difficili da vedere, perché non ci siete mai andati!! Svegliate i neuroni sopiti!

[@Milkomeda_Galaxy]

It feels like they’re making the night to the day for some seconds

[@dejanhaskovic5204]

Oh god, i get so frustrated when i see "Where are the stars?" comments...

[@blakesnipe5347]

I'd bet that AT LEAST 95% of the people making that comment are trolls.

[@backstabber765]

The rocket flies above the clouds, then levels out when you can no longer see it, then lands... How do you people believe this "footage." 2:55 has to be my favourite. At 8 minutes leave the video at double speed. There was no moon landing. I can't believe the intellect of this generation.

[@dejanhaskovic5204]

Julian S I dont get it. Why do you think its impossible to go to the Moon? Second, rockets *never* fly on cloudy day. Third, in order to get into orbit, you must turn and burn towards the horizon if you want to pull the orbit out. If you are such and expert in debunking nasa, you need to be introduced with basics of orbital mechanics in order to judge what is legit and what not. Since you dont research anything, i consider you as a troll.

[@blakesnipe5347]

james dean You would have to deliberately avoid seeking an answer to your question to have never heard it explained. The reason is a matter of exposure. To capture star light, the film/sensor must be exposed to the scene for 15-20 seconds. This is known as a shutter speed and is a MINIMUM for capturing star light. However, for the lunar photographs (and photos of the Earth from the ISS), the subjects are large and brightly lit by the sun, so to properly expose those subjects, a much shorter shutter speed is necessary. 15 full seconds is FAR too long an exposure. For the Apollo Lunar photographs, exposures between 1/60th and 1/250th of a second were used. Since at least 15 full seconds of exposure is required to capture star light on film, you should be able to imagine that an exposure of 1/60th of a second is far too short an exposure to capture star light. So, the very fact that the lunar surface is properly exposed tells anyone familiar with photography - and specifically exposure - that the settings prohibit star light from.showing up. They COULD take photos of stars from the ISS on the dark side of Earth (and they do - just not many). The problem is again - they need 15-20 seconds of exposure and the ISS is in orbit - so the stars move a lot relative to the orientation of the camera in that time. It's difficult, so a lot of the photos of stars you get from the ISS are star trails - for this very reason. There is no reason to attempt to take quality pictures of the stars from the ISS when things like Hubble exist. Hubble can take far better pictures because it is designed to take pictures. Ts designed to take its own orbit around Earth into account to track and maintain focus on a partuclar area of the sky. That's literally Hubble's job. When you have that, taking photographs from the ISS is more for artistic purposes than scientific.

[@rockwoodcomic]

Go outside at night with your iPhone. Take a picture of a streetlight with the stars in the background. Now count the visible stars in your picture. There won't be any. The camera exposes for the streetlight (the rocket) and in doing so, the faint stars are too dim to appear. This is basic photography.

[@dan_rad]

"I hope I'm living when we leave this solar system on a venture to find another planet earth"... Nearly 50 years ago :(

[@alexanderleto7287]

As a Scientist I believe we will not leave the solar system in 50 years. Maybe we reach Mars but more will not be possible

[@YDDES]

@@alexanderleto7287 Agree.

[@Black-Maple]

Most Amazing and epic human adventure. Will be like a kid until my death when i look at this.. thanks for that.

[@ohger1]

Bedtime for us was 8 pm. Mom let me stay up and watch Apollo 11 live. I'll never forget that.

[@gumpyflyale2542]

Its been over 47 years and counting no one has left LEO since December 1972 and no one ever will because we have been lied to for over 50 years

[@NoelistAvenger]

@@gumpyflyale2542 No conspiracy of that magnitude could possibly hold up for over 50 years. Bill Clinton couldn't get blowjobs from an intern without the whole world knowing about it one year later, but the US would've been able to fake SIX multi-billion dollars moon missions involving hundreds of thousands people, tricking not only their own polation but also every single other nation in the world ? Come on...

[@PradeepGupta-ku2sr]

If possible moon should be revisited. It will keep the world busy. Also some new technologies may emerge. the world will find a purpose.

[@PradeepGupta-ku2sr]

moon has been demystefied. science has won.

[@Javier23gol]

9:56 Damn I feel a little jealousy cause they were having an awesome time on the moon. I would love to feel that experience.

[@apxpandy4965]

+Javier Torres Just go outside and jump around - that's what the astronauts did!

[@TheBeresford7]

Get someone to attach a wire to you above you on a scaffold, go out at night to the desert paint the sand. That's how Nasa did it basically.

[@apxpandy4965]

There's a lot of people on these pages that wanna attach a wire to my neck and then attach it to a scaffold! But you're right - there's plenty of nasa footage showing them using wire suspended activity. Strange how not too many can make the correlation between nasa showing them what they did and the later footage that pretends to be on the moon.

[@nebtheweb8885]

You have obviously never been to a launch. Thats a lot of power. Why waste a perfectly good rocket just to make you pendejos think it was real? As for the moon shots, well there were no wires. At 1/6th the gravity of the earth even carrying 300 pounds on a 200 pound man amounts to about 83 pounds total. On earth it would be 500 pounds. But then again I am a little prejudiced because I have had the pleasure of meeting Harrison Hagan "Jack" Schmitt, the American geologist, retired NASA astronaut, university professor and former U.S. senator from New Mexico when he was Senator here. My brother was the the lucky one though as he actually worked for the man for a few years after his astronaut days. You might want to pick up one of his books to read when you are not trolling Utube looking for trouble.

[@apxpandy4965]

Oh Boy! You must be a s'thick as a brick? I mean, what's wrong with your brain? Why would going to the moon suddenly make you 'slow down'? Any idiot knows that agility in movement is all about 'power-to-weight' - and yet your own figures show that even suited up, and astronaut is only going to weight around 1/3 as much as he would on earth. So wouldn't that make him more agile? But then, I guess, if you're an idiot, why would you ever reach that conclusion? You're (obviously) also so stupid, yo haven't seen the reduced-gravity simulations that nasa did, way before they ever launched anyone. That footage shows quite clearly that what you're saying is utter bullshit! All that makes me wonder - are you from the moon? A brain made for the moon would slow down somewhat when re-located to earth. Sounds like you?

[@nasaskywatcher5200]

Apollo 17 was the eleventh manned space mission in the NASA Apollo programme. It was the first night launch of a U.S. human spaceflight and the sixth and final lunar landing mission. The mission was launched at 12:33 a.m. EST on 7 December 1972, and concluded on December 19. One of the last two men to set foot on the Moon was also the first scientist-astronaut, geologist Harrison ("Jack") Schmitt. While Evans circled in America, Schmitt and Cernan collected a record 109 lb (49 kg) of rocks during three Moonwalks. The crew roamed for 34 km (21 mi) through the Taurus-Littrow valley in their rover, discovered orange-colored soil, and left the most comprehensive set of instruments in the ALSEP on the lunar surface. Their mission was the last in the Apollo lunar landing missions. The last 4 Apollo craft were used for the three Skylab missions and the ASTP, mission in 1975.

[@jagosingh85]

Wow!!! A night launch of the Saturn!! What an amazing sight.

[@furerorban1488]

It was nice to relive a moment that I shared with my family years ago. My dad saw to it that we were interested in the things that went on around us. At that age...I would have missed it had it not been for him and my mom!❤

[@damachine3]

10:08 "May is the year of the month." Oxygen running low...get back inside!

[@smoke4852]

...i-

[@notincaps]

@@smoke4852 penis penis 123

[@smoke4852]

@@notincaps wtf

[@raskolndimitri6527]

@@smoke4852 raskoln dimitri love you

[@MrVonKruger]

Just awesome... Can't wait to watch the new Orion launch, that's going to be some show.

[@KevinMurphy0403]

Fantastic. Incredible achievement and the icing on the cake of manned lunar exploration.

[@appletongallery]

The icing on the cake- Like been there, done that? Imagine if the world acted that way after the Wright Brothers got their plane off the ground. Gee guys - been there done that no need to ever get a plane off the ground again- “icing on the cake”!

[@davidlafleche1142]

@@appletongalleryManned space travel is pointless at best and an act of rebellion against God at worst.

[@anatomycat98]

I can't even imagine how awesome it would have been like to be one of the guys who walked on the moon.

[@Legorreta.M.D]

I would imagine O2 must deplete incredibly quickly with the toddler like excitement

[@certainpointofview3860]

Become a Freemason and maybe you can.

[@queenbabymama5635]

Nobody walked on the moon🤓

[@ChrisPBacon777]

@@queenbabymama5635 actually, quite few people walked on the moon. You seem to think there was only one moon mission, but there were several.

[@ChrisPBacon777]

@@certainpointofview3860 what percentage of total freemason membership got to walk on the moon? What exactly are my chances?

[@RhodriSmith]

"May is the month of the year!" Those chums are delighted to be on the moon.

[@trapper439]

Schmitt sounds so happy and confident on the descent, calling Cernan "Gene-o" etc. The guy was obviously having a blast the whole time, trusting in their training and really enjoying himself during the epic event of his life. Awesome.

[@Serhya]

he's confident because it's bullshit

[@aussiefan354]

@@Serhya It is absolutley fake

[@rewdwarf123]

@@aussiefan354 Well, you've got to admire them for keep doing that funny walk for several hours a day.

[@Bibiisachildkiller]

Yeah he was having a blast lying to millions of people, do you consider that "awesome"?

[@fitdogStudios]

Could I suggest flat earthers plan a scientific mission to the underside of the earth.

[@ghostwhite1648]

How about allocating some of NASAs 18+b$ budget towards it... oh yeah all you get it cut and edited videos still bro.

[@MattExzy]

@@ghostwhite1648 Flat Earthers don't even know their own underside from their mouths. That's why they dribble so much shit.

[@juliaread2003]

Ghost White. Not a good enough argument that it was fake. It happened a long time ago and at the time this was going to be a continuous project. Lack of enthusiasm by the public, Funding and more important and pressing issues on planet earth put an end to space exploration for the time being.. Blimey in those 50 years the importance of keeping the video safe and in its entirety perhaps as the years went by didn't seem as important. The BBC insanley taped over their coverge of the 69 moon landing because video was expensive and had to be reused. People do stupid things, but you don't need to make a conspiracy out of it.

[@daniellanyi8287]

No just tell them to travel around the Earth genius

[@andrewmossop6547]

@@juliaread2003 read what you wrote haha

[@tomjohnson7529]

45 years ago today Challenger landed. RIP Gene and Apollo. I know you really did it. Tell the story Senator Schmitt.

[@TrTV7]

8:48 the cutest thing i ever seen :3

[@YeetDisDude]

thats a astronaut struggling for hid life, if he fell hard he'd die on the moon

[@palyze]

its not cute lol, falling on the moon is extremely dangerous

[@TheLondonCyclist]

His wire kept him up slightly.

[@moritz7613]

@@TheLondonCyclist you know that moon gravity is 9 times less than earths gravity. this means btw you fall 9 times slower

[@TheLondonCyclist]

@@moritz7613 Did you know I'm superman?

[@eliaspeter7689]

People commenting stupid fake things: *You know I'm something of a scientist myself.*

[@PatrickLensch]

They behaved exact the way I would do on moon because: YOLO 🙃

[@rameshchinnasandra9115]

This is movie

[@PatrickLensch]

@@rameshchinnasandra9115 maybe, science fiction ...

[@chetanphoenix]

Lol it's so funny when the astronaut fell down at 8:52

[@RevolverAnthology]

+Chetan Bhadrashette yeah, shame it was on earth !

[@Dreadpirateflappy]

+Ackyman that's it... ignore all the evidence and proof, just show your ignorance instead.

[@RevolverAnthology]

+Monkeybox Gaming proof? Ha ha ha. When they going back again did you say?

[@Angelkid190]

Ackyman Naw silly, it was actually in space. Lol

[@ctrlaltrepeat245]

Weell despite the entire, if he fell on a rock his suit would tear up causing him to slowley be deprived of oxygen

[@jacob5728]

Wow, about hit 50 years anniversary. An amazing feat showing that humans can achieve the impossible

[@freddybob807]

Yup. Unfortunately that poor camera guy who filmed them leaving is still there on the moon. We should celebrate him.

[@carlkinder8201]

@@freddybob807 lol, you must think that every drone has a tiny person inside operating the camera.

[@freddybob807]

@@carlkinder8201 And you must think whatever your masters tell you to think.

[@carlkinder8201]

@@freddybob807 I believe what science and education tell me to believe. You believe what an uneducated failed cab driver (Bart Sibrel) tells you to believe.

[@Lowonfuel]

​@@freddybob807 You can hear them at NASA talking what they'll do next as they turn that camera lens down, to a side, etc. In the Apollo 14 video you can hear the camera handler (by RC) say he will turn the camera off. Most of you unbelievers seem to think that Remote Control was unknown at the time.

[@jesoby]

Imagine how exciting landing on Earth would be if you had only lived on the moon.

[@YDDES]

Yeah! You would be crawling like an amoeba in the gravity, that is 6 times what you were used to...

[@arcosprey4811]

@@YDDES actually its about 1.6x Moons gravity not 6x

[@YDDES]

@@arcosprey4811 Moons gravity is 6 times weaker than Earths . Nothing else.

[@killgazmotron]

such a positive attitude the whole time, joking around etc. Cant help but think i would be in a constant state of tense paranoia of something going wrong. Balls of steel.

[@appletongallery]

Balls of deception more like it. They were sitting around in Arizona.

[@marshallcello1128]

They did have balls of steel, but they also trained their asses off. They were prepared.

[@appletongallery]

@@marshallcello1128 They we’re actors. This was a ho*ax.

[@dincadan78]

Very impressive movie. It is a pity that no other expeditions for the Moon have took place since then :( But we must remain optimistic for the Mars landing.

[@BCO216]

The only real comment on this bs Hollywood movie. My question is 1, where did the rover come from. 2, the moon landing capsule is totally different from the earth landing capsule?? 3, where is all the fuel stored. 3, why hasn't anyone in earth been back to the moon????

[@thegreatdivide825]

@@BCO216 Google has more friends than you

[@BCO216]

@Terrence Owen government Google been lying to gullible people for decades. At some point QandA's need to be answered to support stories being told. Many countries were racing to get to the moon, and US wanted/needed to be first by all means necessary.

[@redabdab]

@@BCO216oh wow! I had always believed this up to now, but your brilliant and well-informed analysis has completely changed my mind. You have demolished all the so-called experts and I can only assume you must be the most intelligent person ever to walk the earth

[@darthos6257]

​@@BCO216 I'd like to think there's no such thing as a stupid question, but all of yours seem to tow that line. 1. The rover was slung and folded against the side of the descent stage. It's very small in comparison to the lander. 2. The Lunar Module was designed for exactly that; to land astronauts on the Moon. It lacks sufficient thermal shielding to enter Earth's atmosphere; the Command Module was what the Apollo astronauts used to re-enter the atmosphere, attached to the Service Module which separates just before re-entry. 3. Fuel is stored in several tanks inside the descent and ascent stages. They're hidden from view. 4. NASA's funding peaked in 1966 but fell year after year following, especially after Apollo 11. It was decided that Skylab and the Space Shuttle would be better value for money, which is why the final missions were postponed and then cancelled. Apollo's 18 & 19 were cancelled in 1970 due to the aforementioned budget cuts, and the Saturn V rocket that was to take Apollo 20 to the Moon was reassigned as the launcher for Skylab. Going to the Moon was expensive, and required a lot of political will, as well as considerably risk to men and machine. Why return to the Moon when probes and landers could get there a lot cheaper?

[@Momo-bb2fn]

15:46 what a dream... one much more tangible back then, being that we hadn’t even sent *anything* to space a decade before going to the moon. Almost half a century later and we haven’t even gone back.

[@Momo-bb2fn]

We’ve had great advances, don’t get me wrong, but imagine what would be if America still had that fervor for space, one fueled by curiosity and a spirit of exploration, rather than a Cold War

[@rockethead7]

@@Momo-bb2fn Yeah. But, very few people want to fork over their money for so few people to be able to do those explorations. For example, it took a dictatorship to fund Magellan's voyage around the world, because if left up to the general populous, they wouldn't have wanted to pay for it. Even Magellan's own country's king (Portugal) didn't want to pay for it, and that's why Magellan ended up being paid by Spain's king instead. And, Magellan's voyage costed nowhere near Apollo, not by a long shot, not even close. And, that was for hundreds of people to go, and lasted three years. Apollo costed orders of magnitude more, and only resulted in 12 men walking on the moon for a few hours each. Yeah, you're right, the cold war produced that, while we are left only imagining what would happen if the public funded things like that purely for the sake of curiosity. We, as a species, don't tend to do that very much. Most of the time, we fund voyages that we ourselves can go on. We very rarely dump that level of money, funding from hundreds of millions of people, into voyages that only a dozen people get to make. You're right, it is a bit of a shame. But, that's the reality about humanity.

[@Momo-bb2fn]

@@rockethead7 exactly, only I’d change ur second sentence to “very few want to fork over their money for _exploration_ “ In my mind, people going on explorations is hardly even part of the question. I’m more referring to the technology, which in itself is an exploration, one people don’t appreciate. As u said, such is humanity

[@queenbabymama5635]

With all our advanced technology and NASA they would have gone back had they went at all. This is so fake. I do not believe they walked on the moon. This is Hollywood.

[@justinmadrid8712]

Watch the video footage of this take-off from the camera inside the LM. Watch it side-by-side with this take-off. It does not match at all. When the LM performs ‘pitch over’, absolutely no pitch over can be seen in the video from within the LM. “Surely a mistake like this would be front page news!” Nope, the Moon landings are perhaps the biggest real life example of the ‘Emperor has no no clothes’.

[@YDDES]

If You look thorougly, the camera is often "left behind" when the astronauts move. Sometimes the camera operator knew in advance in which direction they would move and could start the panning in time. When he followed the LM's lift off, he knew exactly when the count down should reach "zero" and started the tilt up about a second in advance.

[@personalg3754]

All that 50 years ago 😂😂😂

[@YDDES]

@@personalg3754 Were You even around 50 years ago, so You know anything about What they could do in that time? I was.

[@personalg3754]

@@YDDES yes, I was

[@YDDES]

@@personalg3754 Well, Then You should know they were quite advanced in that time too and just as intelligent that we are today.

[@personalg3754]

@@YDDES I know all this crap is fake. I served in Desert Storm, Iraqi Freedom and years as a DOD contractor in Afghanistan. Trust me, I know what kind of fiction our government comes up with. Time is catching up with the lies but all involved will be dead.

[@theianova9856]

Un beau montage de cinéma ,tous mes compliments.

[@ericdu6499]

Le plus grand mensonge de l'humanité surtout. Le drapeau qui flotte au vent . Plus c'est gros mieux ça passe. La reconnaissance faciale vient de mettre à jour le montage bois ,aluminium de cette mascarade. C'est le serpent qui se mort la queue .

[@mlasko74]

The first astronauts had unbelievably solid nuts! 😀

[@antoniorangel9784]

Poklando he rediscovered it lol, never seen someone glorify Columbus so much lol

[@Wet_Deer]

I love how happy they were to be on the moon

[@gustav_ostervall_92]

I love how unhappy they were in conjunction with the interviews afterwards. After all, lying to the overall population sure takes its toll.

[@lulupinkus5627]

Happy to be in a studio, dummie

[@EuanWhitehead]

@@gustav_ostervall_92 Yea must have been pretty tough for the USSR to lie about it for their enemies protection too. And China... and India... and every other country too...

[@sinenkaari5477]

Moonlanding is one of those things i can't decide in my head do i believe it or not, there's so many things that are off about it like the black space without stars and that interview where they are almost scared for their life. In this video by the end i can see one time it looks like the guy is hanging out there with his helmet open couse his face is showing. I don't think it would be impossible to go there so did they fake the footage only? Those "simulation" s on the TV station are pretty close to the thing seen in the supposed real footage. This thing remains mystery to me at this point.

[@STS-Dreamer]

@@gustav_ostervall_92so this is a video of Apollo 17, and you’re referring to a single picture from after Apollo 11 which really isn’t the smoking gun you think it is. oh the guys who just went through a very exhausting mission aren’t sitting like cheerleaders with fake smiles plastered on their faces 24/7? must be fake

[@1arritechno]

Apollo 17 was the last mission to the Moon ; at the time, no one would have thought that most of the staff at NASA, would have passed on from old age ; waiting for another Moon mission. The question is whether we see it return in our life time ?

[@pipercub123456]

IMO Moon travel will certainly happen in 5 years at most...can you say China..Russia ..and India...or possibly a company located in private industry but ...I seriously doubt if the USA nation as a whole..will return to the Moon during the lifetime of anyone now living who is past the age of 20

[@1arritechno]

pipercub123456 Within five years to the next Moon landing ? I wish you were right, although it maybe attempted, the chance of success is extremely unlikely. Rocket science on the scale of the Saturn 5 is so often taken for granted today ! F1 is still the most powerful built, the most reliable rocket and it made the Apollo program a success. Records show: everything else has been either too small or fails during test ; all the rest is just theory ! Once we witness some large rocket launch into the heavens ; "only then" a landing will be within 5 years at most....

[@danacostello5908]

We destroyed the technology and erased the tapes. It was a bad memory I guess.

[@NzJohny]

​@@pipercub123456this aged well ;)

[@gianfranco_maldetto_92]

Sure! Wake up, sheep.

[@fazejax5255]

This is probably my favorite Apollo mission because it was so funny

[@Anxian]

There's a mirror on the surface of the Moon (Lunar Laser Ranging experiment) that we can point a laser at and measure it's distance from us. If we didn't go there, how the hell did that get there?

[@pornstarnarek]

The sand on the moon are like glass shards, so maybe it formed naturally

[@RobertPlattBell]

Do not feed the trolls

[@randymarshole]

There's also some man made shit on Mars yet no human has stepped on it's surface but I still believe man has walked on the moon.

[@robotguy4]

Robotic landing craft. However, there's a better piece of evidence that doesn't require any technical knowledge: The Russians didn't call bullshit. I mean, if the moon landing was faked, they probably would have known. The USSR had an unmanned spacecraft in lunar orbit at the time and probably had KGB spies infiltrating the US government and its allies (at least in British intelligence. See Oxford Five).

[@RobertPlattBell]

robotguy4 Exactly.

[@lyon406]

10:22 The earth and stars

[@topg7290]

lyon406 nice to see the earth from a other planet

[@user-ms3jo1zh2k]

Faaaaaakeeeee lol

[@eniix4681]

@@user-ms3jo1zh2k Not you idiotic kids again...

[@factodark5076]

@@user-ms3jo1zh2k moron

[@maurisola]

La cámara no está ajustada

[@jack-nicholson1470]

In the 2019 it's ridiculous

[@Gen3Benz]

You can tell they are nearly floating with the low moon gravity. 100% real.

[@valentinotera3244]

Dust properties prove it 100%.

[@gustav_ostervall_92]

Actually, they doctored the recording of the "astronaut" walking in terms of changing the video to slow-motion. In normal speed, the astronauts are seen walking or running, and the prevalence of gravity becomes all to clear.

[@mike.j3913]

😂🤣

[@heyneken2156]

"Apollo Program" Producer: Walt Disney deceased at that time. Co-producer: Wernher Von Braun. Director: Stanley Kubrick Art Director: John Hoesli. Writer: Arthur C Clarke. Photographer: Geoffrey Unsworth. Total cost = 169.51 billion current dollars..... Something very logical is that the Apollo missions were carried out in the 🌎because if it had been true that NASA in 1962 sent its first astronaut into space, taking just "6" years to take them to the 🌙 because in 1968 they orbited it, in 1969 they walked on it , in 1972 they were for the last time, bone today "50" years later at least we were vacationing in the 🌒 and traveling to Mars.

[@YDDES]

Heyneken2156. Liar.

[@YDDES]

heyneken2156 What was Kubrick ”directing”? What the different instruments in the modules were supposed to do, or How they should move on ”Moon”? He was an expert of nothing of it.

[@damianista]

Shhhh...! The Earth is Flat! Nothing and no one can enter or leave this Kingdom...

[@YDDES]

@@damianista Except the meteorites… 🤪

[@NiagaraRaveRiders]

Walt Disney was a great story teller

[@OuterSpaceandTimelapses4]

Today’s the 50th anniversary of the Apollo 17 lunar landing!

[@abdalmh977]

😂😂

[@thealt1375]

I would love to see the earth from the moon. Just looking at the blue marble in the sky.

[@dotdot607]

Space*

[@thealt1375]

@@dotdot607 . It takes a while before you can completely see the earth

[@freddyferrillo9704]

At 1:38 When he goes, "Houston we're right in the middle of a snowstorm", notice all the orbs moving in random direction. He was speaking in code.

[@liamnitro2707]

What do you mean

[@TourOfTorun]

Try watching some of the videos taken from the lunar rover - it drives for a long towards the distant mountains whih you claim to be backdrops, and they come no nearer or change in perspective, proving they're many miles away. In addition, many stereo-pair images were taken, which show that the landscape is exactly what is seems: vast. If there was a backdrop 100 feet away, stereo pairs would show it up immediately.

[@gianfranco_maldetto_92]

The true color of lunar surface is pink, not grey. Wake up!

[@DeweyTucker]

The moon landings are as valid as the theories of gravity.

[@DeweyTucker]

ThePariss333 Yep

[@DeweyTucker]

ThePariss333 are you the humanoid?

[@DeweyTucker]

ThePariss333 more than you. It is hard to read your poorly constructed sentences. One can only imagine the thought processes behind them. They are a glimpse of a chaotic mind at work. Run back home to big brother.

[@DeweyTucker]

ThePariss333 I agree with you, you are sorry. You want to call people humanoids and then whine and cry foul when that term is applied to you. I know where you are located by what is coming from you. I agree that you are not a humanoid, but a hemorrhoid.

[@ssqxw5564]

They cleaned the studio very well spotless

[@Jellybeantiger]

Awesome the view of the Earth,half sleeping,half awake. 10:17

[@wadejustanamerican1201]

This is Awesome I don't know why people would say it's fake. It's just a sham people don't believe. If they just would open their eyes they could see the bigger picture.

[@kingpabsgaming8156]

Not your eyes you need to open, it's your mind.

[@450farf]

@@kingpabsgaming8156and their eyes cause this sh1t fake af

[@nicholaseachus5937]

Yeah crazy people don't believe the government. They are always so honest.

[@SR71ABCD]

*Apollo 17* : That's that and were done! *Artemis 1* : Hold My Beer, were going back!

[@appletongallery]

Also Artemis- “it will take us another 30 years because space flight is hard”.

[@deltaiii3158]

You are going nowhere buddy. First "real" moon mission not before 2040 and first human on mars not before 2100

[@longlivetheking1065]

@@deltaiii3158 moon landing was real, cope

[@genesioribeiro9443]

Uma importante conquista para a humanidade, em tudo que fazemos é preciso ousadia. Parabéns!

[@allgood6760]

Awesome! .. thanks from NZ 👍🇳🇿

[@pasch1mw]

I remember watching these blastoffs. God, how exciting they were.

[@appletongallery]

That’s about the achievement of it- get the rocket off the ground and out of detection with the naked eye. The rest of Apollo was filmed on earth.

[@rewdwarf123]

@@appletongalleryThe naked eye isn't that good for detecting things. Lots of people have to wear glasses!

[@gmnboss]

@@appletongallery lol

[@Relativisticism]

On apollo 17 they were 16 silver oxide-zinc cells. The power head operated around 430 watts. The handle contained the battery pack which could be removed from the power head but also the handle pack and power head could be removed together to allow for additional drill stems to be attached to allow for the desired depth to be achieved. The power head would then be re-attached and drilling would continue.

[@a.kworld2486]

😊😊

[@a.kworld2486]

😊😊

[@momohead2798]

It’s amazing how they can’t get back but they got there in 1972

[@celticfreemason9721]

Momohead That's funny... They have a projected manned Lunar mission for 2024. Research !!!

[@celticfreemason9721]

@Please Complete All Fields do you just chime in yet know nothing about the subjects you chime in on? There is literally Millions of tons of vast resources, such as but not limited to, H3, water ice, the need for solar expansion, ECT. Come on guys, research!

[@celticfreemason9721]

@Please Complete All Fields again. Do some research. Maybe you won't sound like you don't understand why we need to go back.

[@celticfreemason9721]

@Please Complete All Fields that's a sign of intelligent research, I may have pegged you wrong mate. Good show

[@RealClassyStudios]

Momohead They’re already planning a fucking mission Dumbass. The main reason they went was to beat the Soviet Union there in the space race. Truly another dumbass who’s just fucking jealous they wasted their lives unlike the people who actually landed.

[@dannydekker2773]

I'm glad to read there still Americans with good functioning brains who don't think the moon landings where fake. It gives me some hope again.

[@zachecho4260]

if you speed the moon walking by x2 you just see normal people in suits running in earths atmosphere

[@ArnoldsGaming]

uh okay?

[@rawnac5036]

you are correct ...i still think all was fake

[@YDDES]

But the arms and legs move all to fast and jerky…

[@maurisola]

but there is no evidence, instead for the trip to the moon there are 400,000

[@franomarku7754]

50 years ago you could fly 400,000 km to the moon. only 400 km today. really sad

[@ChrisPBacon777]

That has absolutely zero to do with ability. It's amazing that there are still people who think that somehow the ability to fly the moon has been 'lost' somehow. Sad²

[@trinivagrant]

It has to do with it being a hoax. Its a money grab for a group of hijackers. Take a few business classes and learn about 2008 crash and how these guys pull of these scams. Its a ponzi scheme Thats why no commercial flight exists , you or anyone you know has ever been in orbit, why ISS story makes little sense and has no video of the actual construction from beginning module in orbit at 27,000km an hour, and why no videos of anything in orbit exist other than fake iss shotz. We have pictures of ISS in orbit , where are the hours of third party video footage of ISS in orbit

[@scottnukend]

@@trinivagrant Apollo 11 does have video from the command ship view of the lunar rover landing.

[@trinivagrant]

@@scottnukend I would compare space to underwater. In the 60s went hundreds of thousands of KM to visit the moon. At this point 60 years later with trillions spent I imagine if adjust inflation and add all space programs it's odd there is hardly any videos in space showing the splendors of space like the millions of minutes of underwater footage available. Satellites also supposedly have camera capabilities for spy reasons and tens of thousands in existence and there is less than 5 minutes of satellites in orbit and all the splendors of space.

[@dub2459]

People be like "where are all the stars" and I be like "it's day time,the moon just doesn't have a blue sky"

[@AustinALiboiron]

Because the cameras are set to expose the lunar surface, which is so bright that in order to show any detail, the cameras need to be set very very dark. If you were standing there and you looked up, your eyes would adjust and you would see everything

[@sergiolandz6056]

@@AustinALiboiron i dont know at the press conference one said yes and the other said no... so yeah fck them liars !!

[@gianfranco_maldetto_92]

Stars should be visible in daytime on atmosphere-less Earth, as well. Your counter argument is actually borderline idiotic and self-defeating.

[@obamaissatan590]

This is unreal,so bravo

[@francrcg]

Apollo 11 moon landing was fake, not apollo 17

[@TheMagicalNotebook]

It’s not fake.

[@fernandoalves67]

Lindo trabalho.

[@alenico9028]

No minuto 8:50 , um cabo puxa o astronauta para tras e ele cai. Esse cabo colocado nas costas do astronauta servia para simular os movimentos do mesmo na Lua.

[@svenmansfeld]

That's one small step for a man - one giant leap for Hollywood

[@apocalips8008]

and your mothers one small moment with stranger in a backstreet porn video made one giant turd of a man....

[@heinoheme1178]

Actually, Apollo 11 was close to an abort of the landing. They were nearly out of descent fuel when they landed. The autopilot was steering them into a boulder field and Armstrong had to take manual control, and steer the LM to a viable landing site. When they were preparing to ascend, they discovered that a switch, vital to arming the ascent engine had been broken, and Armstrong had to poke a pen into the hole where the switch had been. Otherwise they would have been stuck on the moon.

[@arcosprey4811]

Of all switches that could break lol

[@MattyEngland]

Cool story bro

[@thegreatdivide825]

@@MattyEngland Did you understand any of it?

[@thegreatdivide825]

@@bennyskim Well you've got an F in your report and that pretty much sums up your life as well

[@ApolloKid1961]

Over more than 10 years, Project Apollo involved 400,000 people working at major contractors such as Boeing, North American Aviation, Douglas Aircraft Company, IBM, Motorola and MIT University. Converted to today, the costs were 341 billion dollars and this is the main reason why 'we' didn't go back. After Apollo 11 there were 5 more other landings. Apollo 12 to 17 except 13 Kubrick? No film director is going to make the same film SIX times from the same set with bad camera equipment and only different actors. Also CGI didn't exist yet. Van Allen? Astronauts are protected by their spacesuits and by the metal shell of the rocket. Moreover, they fly shortly through the least strong belts. Why no stars? All films and photos were taken during daylight. Trying to get stars in a photo will result in an overexposed photo. Are all the data lost? No. The Apex tape recordings of the TV broadcast and telemetry were overwritten but all the 16mm films and photos are still in the NASA Archive. Can we still see the landing sites? Both the dual rover tracks and the footprints are clearly visible in the images, which were captured and beamed back by NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO).

[@BIGBaNANaBender]

You just gotta love the small pop of an explosion that apparently lifted them off the moon high enough to escape the moons gravity and meet up with a mother ship in the moons orbit ROFL

[@ChrisPBacon777]

The 'small pop' that you think was the actual engine was the explosive charge that released the ascent module from the whole assembly. You can't see the plume from the engine, as the fuel burned with a clear discharge.

[@450farf]

@@ChrisPBacon777lol if you believe that I got beachfront property in oklahoma to sell ya

[@ChrisPBacon777]

@@450farf if you don't understand how reality works, then that makes it clear why you think you have a beachfront property nowhere near the ocean, or why you have no clue how things work in space 🤦

[@450farf]

@@ChrisPBacon777 lol exactly. What we’re seeing in the Apollo 17 lm footage is simply a model being pulled up over a fake backdrop. It’s very cartoonish, early sci fi movie utilized same techniques. Laughable today but hey they couldn’t predict the future

[@ChrisPBacon777]

@@450farf 'lol exactly' Well, at least you agree you're clueless. I also think you need to use more 'lols'. You're not very convincing, except for how clueless you are 🤪 Maybe more lols will help.

[@Godscountry2732]

The Saturn V was a sight to behold,a monster of a rocket,who would of thought something that big could fly.

[@davidlafleche1142]

Manned space travel is an act of rebellion against God.

[@thevaltierra]

Great movie. I love practical fx

[@wolfbbq6076]

Man will soon be back on the moon , space exploration is getting very interesting again .

[@paulnash6944]

When you went on one of the most important missions ever, but there are people who think it was all faked: [Angry astronaut noises]

[@Maroje01]

Cause its fake

[@edgyliveleak]

WAYNE ROONEYTM why? Cause you don't understand how they did it?

[@Leofiora]

Great work of Kubrick.

[@oscarpinchen4431]

@@Leofiora, it was a great shout to film on location, Kubrick. Would’ve been an order of magnitude harder to do all that on Earth on a sound stage... 😉

[@Leofiora]

@@oscarpinchen4431 it's a Great FX scene, like " A 2001 Space Odyssey "🥱🥱

[@irwincrook567]

8:46 😂😂😂haha

[@afganistannotienepetroleo1271]

Impresionante ver el despegue nocturno del Saturno V. Que poder...Ese moustruo podia poner en OBT casi 120 Tn. POr otra parte, el ML que vemos despegar, tenia una llama casi sin brillo. Eso es por el tipo de combustible (es como los cohetes que queman alcohol o hidrogeno, que la llama es azul)

[@ipor1]

man,i wish i was one of them!imagine the filling to be standing on the moon.crazy awesome!!!!!

[@ligmaketchup3283]

This is awesome. Wish I could go to the moon.

[@moseswashington1654]

Simply Amazing

[@Elimination1011]

I wonder how can people refute moon landings, whereas it had been 6 times . Then i think of flat earthers and above all those who think this gigantic, complex & delicately balanced universe came into existence by "chance"🤔

[@AMC2283]

So often people who criticize those for thinking the us government might lie about something bring up flat earth out of nowhere. Did you ever consider that they want you to to think that because the earth is round, then obviously the moon landings are real? Like if you doubt Apollo you must therefore think the earth is flat which is nonsense

[@bennyskim]

Non-religious people are now flat-earthers? Irony

[@ryanseidl100]

Because earth isnt a perfect sphere and that pass off cartoons as the real deal. The radiation would have killed them and no it's not just a matter of let's go really fast. They would have constant high level exposures. Look at the stars rotating around Polaris. Also the horizon always follows no matter how high you go

[@YDDES]

@@ryanseidl100 No, the horizon doesn’t always ”follow”. Have You never seen Pictures of the whole Earth?? There is even a picture taken by a Voyager sond, showing Earth like a Star in the distance. Please don’t be a silly flat Earther…

[@rickylafleur9601]

Imagine walking on that grey penny sized ball you see when you look up at the sky at night.

[@MauroYankee]

so it's more easy travel to the moon than manufacture an hd camera.

[@YDDES]

At least for the rocket engineers...

[@eventcone]

Yan It depends what you mean by an "hd" camera. Photographic film is high definition, and they had excellent film cameras.

[@germansnowman]

It doesn’t help that this video was taken from a VHS tape. If you have the chance, watch the new Apollo 11 documentary in the movie theater, it will blow your mind with the amazingly detailed 70 mm footage.

[@mauriciodenasau8243]

dumbass

[@harikishore2514]

No. It's choice and preference over other. They interested in exploration. HD camera ain't give nothing.

[@blodbrodet]

Can`twait for the Artemis program!

[@sirhuddlestonfuddleston5708]

If this is all faked, why did they have so many problems? Hell, the first landing, Armstrong had to almost abort, and careen over the surface looking for a place free of boulders. Why fake that? For excitement? If so, why not fake more excitement in later missions? The point is, deniers have responses to all those questions, but their answers are simply arbitrary. They just try to stir up dust, and hope that in the cloud of speculation they generate, people will get confused, shrug, and say “I guess so.” No wonder they think NASA lies. They’re so used to telling people bullshit, they expect that all other people ALSO want to tell bullshit rather than the truth. A liar thinks everybody lies all the time. I don’t know what emotional need this solves for these people. I think they justifiably feel taken advantage of by modern commercialism, so they assume things have always been that way. Well, they weren’t. It’s hard to believe how different the world was before the internet and social media and smartphones.

[@lancegoerner1719]

Hey, go fake your own Moon landing!

[@lordcelticfrost8686]

Good words..100% true

[@theveryproudmoroccan2834]

What you say comes from your ignorance about the evidence that disproves your ridiculous allegations.

[@adoy5935]

يَا مَعْشَرَ الْجِنِّ وَالْإِنسِ إِنِ اسْتَطَعْتُمْ أَن تَنفُذُوا مِنْ أَقْطَارِ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ فَانفُذُوا ۚ لَا تَنفُذُونَ إِلَّا بِسُلْطَانٍ (33)

[@gamingwithrdx5798]

My respect for the cameraman is increasing day by day

[@vcare4893]

He works in studio.

[@paithankarkaran3843]

@@vcare4893 😂😂

[@fishboy3987]

8:51 rip astronaut

[@dragonball-hs4is]

Já pensou uma missão dessas hoje exibida em HD?

[@sheetalagarwalla1241]

The answer is Artemis mission my friend coming soon from 2024

[@djblazept]

pois, nunca aconteceu..

[@abdalmh977]

​@@djblazeptنعم لم يخرج احد من الارض

[@abdalmh977]

​@@sheetalagarwalla1241لم يخرج احد من هذه الارض ولم ذهبوا للقمر

[@P-Drum]

Half a century later the richest men on the planet can't even leave lower Earth atmosphere, yet the average phone is supposed to be more advanced than those space shuttles.

[@Carlitosonichan]

the money of that time is worth nothing compared to now, to go to the moon with humans would cost much more approximately 150 billion dollars

[@P-Drum]

@@Carlitosonichan What do you mean worth nothing compared to today? I'm no expert but 50 years of inflation and hyperproduktion compared to a time when the dollar still was based on the gold standard, seems to me that the price would in reality be higher back then.

[@ChrisPBacon777]

What would be the point of going to the moon for the richest men on earth? The cost of doing that is far, far greater than launching anything into orbit. Regarding your second irrelevant statement, I'd like to see an 'average phone' leave LEO, or even just orbit the earth once 😂

[@rockethead7]

How does it feel when everything you type is filled with massive ignorance? What's wrong with you? YOU SAID: "Half a century later the richest men on the planet can't even leave lower Earth atmosphere" == People have been leaving the lower atmosphere since the jet airplane was invented. Good grief. Some of the rich people are even going into space now on sub-orbital flights. YOU SAID: "yet the average phone is supposed to be more advanced than those space shuttles." == What in the world do phones have to do with space shuttles? What ARE you talking about? Dummy, it takes more than just computing power to go into space. As a matter of fact, computational capability is an extremely minor factor when it comes to aerospace engineering. YOU SAID: "I'm no expert but 50 years of inflation and hyperproduktion compared to a time when the dollar still was based on the gold standard" == Dummy, the USA went off of the gold standard in 1933. NASA didn't even exist back then. It's more like 90 years ago, not 50 years ago. Sheeesssssshhhhhh. What ARE you talking about? YOU SAID: "seems to me that the price would in reality be higher back then." == Yes, and it was (if we're now talking about the 1960s and 1970s). This is why Apollo costed about $250 billion (adjusted for inflation, and if you include hard costs, soft costs, and international support). Today's Artemis program is budgeted at about $30 billion. But, I'd be surprised if the budget doesn't balloon like so many other government programs. But, still, yes, it's cheaper now. What's your point? I truly can't understand what you're even trying to get at. You're saying Apollo was fake, right?

[@NiagaraRaveRiders]

​@Carlitosonichan cool story Walt. But we can get shit to mars 😂😂

[@mynamenotimportant7784]

how did they fit the rover on such a small module ?

[@willoughbykrenzteinburg]

How big do you think the rover is? It fit because it fit.

[@mynamenotimportant7784]

but why isn't there footage of them assembling it? they land, then......its there. and did they have time to pack it up? I have seen rover (actual one, not replicated) exhibited on display before.......

[@timulbrich954]

Mynamenotimportant the lrv, the lunar roving vehicle, was actually folded into a small space, they opened a hatch on the lander and took it out by hand, its actual weight on the moon was about 35 kilograms, so it was no Problem at all

[@mtmindtoo7669]

Mynamenotimportant Hi, here's some footage of the rover being deployed on the moon; /watch?v=-ShauSWcTC4 And here's the procedure being tested on earth; /watch?v=ObEjEEfnBj8 I hope that helps.

[@TerryBadger]

***** Typical NASA

[@TourOfTorun]

You eloquent defence of your contention that the Apollo missions had a backdrop 100ft away continues to impress me.

[@freegee3503]

The scenes with the hills in the distance are always the same. No rough areas or craters on the hills. All smooth. 😅🤣

[@eventcone]

No. They are not.

[@freegee3503]

@@eventcone And in the other photos and videos there are craters and rough surface. This shows the surface way too smooth. 🤣😅

[@eventcone]

@@freegee3503 On the mountain slopes? But there may be a rational explanation for that. For instance, what is the ratio of mountain slope area to maria plains' area?

[@freegee3503]

@@eventcone I would hope that the rational explanation is due to lack of video quality but since it is all staged there is no hope for that.

[@freegee3503]

@@eventcone On the hill faces and in this video all of the terrain.

[@3odayzak]

Wow ,i used to think that USA landed only once on the moon,i just realized they had multiple missions starting apollo 10 all the way to apollo 17,i believe it was all legit and not fake in any way

[@dansv1]

Apollo 8 was the first manned mission to orbit the moon.

[@ceejay9627]

It's fake asf!

[@hunsadersrockinranch]

lol, Arizona looked pretty good back then wouldn't you say?

[@YDDES]

Did Arizona really have sunlight from a black sky, back then? Don't think so...

[@hunsadersrockinranch]

YDDES It's never dark in Arizona at night! The stars are extremely bright.

[@hunsadersrockinranch]

Cliff Yablonski Guess you never seen a Hollywood back drop either.

[@YDDES]

Peter Hunsader So, in your little world, starlight casts only one, deep shadow in one direction? Also, I understand you have NO idea about how film/video effects were created back then.

[@hunsadersrockinranch]

YDDES I can just say it's not the moon they are filming from. Besides no human could go threw extreme radiation bands and survive!

[@radwilly1770]

RIP Gene Cernan

[@conveyor2]

Roger Clemons: Make the world a better place and go hang.

[@rhz5802]

Yes humans have landed on the moon. Yes humans have a international space station in orbit around earth. Yes we have orbiting satellites around earth. I am sickened by the fact that i have to adress these obvious facts to trolls and idiots who are probably now gonna try there hardest to prove me wrong in the comments and start whining like babies.

[@stephenpage-murray7226]

They’re uneducated and lazy. Not a good combination

[@AMC2283]

Who was president at the time and what was his nickname?

[@SantiagoVelezRestrepo]

The iss is true, more than 15 countries thanks to russia put that castle in orbit, but this is really fake, is imposible even with nowadays tech

[@ChrisPBacon777]

@@SantiagoVelezRestrepo where do you get your opinion that it is impossible, 'even with nowadays tech's from? That is complete bollocks.

[@michaelquintana157]

Ya don't forget the flat earthers

[@firebomb5510]

If a person would research Gravimetrics for 30 minutes ...then you would realize..WE DID go the moon. The gravity is easier to measure on a NON-ACTIVE floating body rather than an ACTIVE BODY(hence the earth that is overly active) Russians French Egyptians Also studied this to know that when we were able to get to the moon,wohld we be able to lift off and get back to earth.The studies and math is deep and awesome.

[@dieglhix]

To all of you conspiracionists: Why did even the Soviet Union accepted this?

[@user-ym9wb2mk5e]

WE sent them wheat and grains, check it out. They also, being our enemy, collected the imager and gave it back to us. COLD War mortal enemies, and they gave it back. Imagine that, lol. Did the Pakastani's give us our parts from the downed helos when we "killed" osama? What about our drones that are captured when they go down? Your enemy doesnt just hand over things unless they have something to gain from it.

[@jackyback2578]

@@user-ym9wb2mk5e That was the most retarded, illegible comment I've ever had the displeasure of reading. Thank you.

[@greatpumpkinpatch9167]

Tomorrow I make sammich...

[@MrT-py5gc]

@@user-ym9wb2mk5e about 1/4 of that comment was legible

[@Lurie2010]

Yeah, I fell for it too. But I am older and wiser now. Damn, it was so freaking obvious too.....

[@gumpyflyale2542]

We all did no shame

[@MrHuNTeR_exe]

Camera man is world class with the shots.

[@afganistannotienepetroleo1271]

Algunos tontos dicen o repiten y repiten... y repiten: _"Quien filmo el despegue del modulo?"_ Para ellos no es la explicacion... a ellos no les interesan las respuestas. El rover lunar tenia una camara de Tv instalada. Esa camara se podia fijar hacia adelante pero tembien podia ser movida o apuntada mecanicamente. Antes de momento del despegue la cámara fue apuntada hacia el módulo lunar. Cuando el modulo lunar estaba listo para el despegue, la camara se enciende por una señal de radio (control remoto) . Cuando el modulo lunar enciende el motor, otra señal de radio activa un motor que hace girar la camara gradualmente hacia arriba. La velocidad de giro se ha regulado para que coincida con la velocidad de ascendo del ML. Eso es algo simple y no requiere explicarselo a los pupulistos (ellos tampoco tienen interes excepto en buscar ideas para mas cuentos). El ambos casos, lo mas probable es que los mismos astronautas escendieran la camara y activaran el giro hacia arriba. El cohete del modulo lunar usa combustibles hipergólicos, que producen una llama que no es amarilla sino mas bien azul (como la llama de alcohol). Por eso la llama no se ve de dia. El modulo de descenso que queda en la superficie lunar estaba protegido por una cubierta aislante de un plastico metalizado, que servia para repeler el calor de la luz solar y esa cubierta se rompe por los gases del motor-cohete delo modulo de ascenso... Eso es lo que parece como fuegos artificiales. TODAS ESTAS COSAS LAS SABIAN LOS RUSOS. ELLOS ESTABAN MUY INTERESADOS EN CONOCER EL PROCEDIMIENTO DEL CAMPEON, PARA IMITARLO, Y TAMBIEN ESTABAN OBLIGADOS A ANALIZAR TODA EVIDENCIA QUE PUDIERA DELATARLES UNA TRAMPA. LOS RUSOS NO QUERIAN PERDER LA CARRERA PERO DESPUES DE CONVENCERSE QUE SI HABIAN PERDIDO, LO RECONOCIERON PUBLICAMENTE. EN RUSOPEDIA PODEIS LEER *CARRERA LUNAR* QUE ES LA CONFESION DE LA DERROTA.

[@greatsilentwatcher]

@southport97 those rocks actually offered a lot of information about the geologic composition of the moon, and the Apollo Landings program yielded a vast amount that later contributed to human space exploration like the International Space Station.

[@RodCalidge]

Can't we just send up a remote control I-phone to snap a few pics of the evidence.? Can't be that hard, can it?

[@justtruth8281]

Someone would dispute that the new pictures were CGI ! Don’t worry flat earth nuts can soon book a flight on space x.but they would be scared that they crash into the dome!

[@rockethead7]

LRO has been sending back images of the landing sites since 2009. There are hundreds upon hundreds of images, from just about every sun angle possible, showing the 6 landers' descent stages, the 3 rovers, foot tracks, rover tracks, experiment packages, etc. It doesn't matter to the conspiratards. They have decided in advance that all evidence for Apollo is fake, no matter how real it is... and all evidence against Apollo is real, no matter how ridiculous it is.

[@RodCalidge]

@@rockethead7 I hear you. My problem is with who is sending these pictures. I am under the impression that the LRO is a NASA entity. Kind of Like the police investigating the police. I was just advocating for a truly independent source to show me the footage that confirms it all. Hopefully they match what we have been shown so far.

[@rockethead7]

@@RodCalidge Yes, ok, but, not a single NASA administrator or engineer is still working at NASA today who was working during the Apollo era. They're all long dead or retired. So, if the conspiratards want to argue that "NASA" (a mysterious magical entity that has apparently enslaved every one of the thousands of administrators and engineers for the past 60 years to commit horrible crimes, without a single one of them ever spilling the beans) cannot be trusted, then they must believe that somehow the conspiracy torch keeps getting handed down from administrator to administrator, engineer to engineer, for generations. This kind of goes against their ridiculous notion that only a handful of people were in on "the moon landing hoaxes," and that only those few people knew it was a major fraud. Of course, that wasn't possible. It would have taken thousands upon thousands of people to pull of that "hoax," including people from around the world in friendly and enemy countries, who all monitored Apollo missions using radar, and radio telescopes, and long range photography. But, anyway, my point is that they don't get to simultaneously claim that an Apollo "hoax" can be committed by a handful of people, then turn around and claim that LRO is an entirely new branch of "the hoax" because it's been passed on down from generation to generation, and that today's engineers are pulling off some stunts with the photographs being sent back by LRO to manipulate them and put imagery of the Apollo landing sites into the frames. But, ok, beyond that, you've also got Japan's JAXA/Selene orbiter, which has verified the photography from Apollo missions in a level of detail that simply wasn't possible in the 1960s/1970s (unless, of course, Apollo was real, which it was, and the photography actually did come from the moon). I mean, they've got an entire section of their website dedicated to the Apollo mission photography taken from on the moon's surface, which they have now verified with JAXA/Selene as being accurate: craters, mountains, etc., in a level of detail that they simply didn't have in 1969-1972, using Selene's 2D and 3D cameras. Now, of course, Selene doesn't have the resolution required to see the landers in any detail (like LRO does). But, it's good enough to know they're there, and it's good enough to know that Apollo's photography was taken from the moon's surface.

[@RodCalidge]

@@rockethead7 all good points

[@kasheem1747]

Real Hollywood

[@ProckerDark]

When we talk with astronauts on the ISS today there is a 5 second lag in communication yet in this video there is zero lag between earth and the moon...

[@MattyEngland]

Weird that isn't it? Almost like they were sat next to each other in a recording studio

[@ProckerDark]

@@MattyEngland i hope more and more people wake up, i just realized how fake all these moon landing footage were, completely blown my mind, what else is fake and i still believe it to be true? That's crazy

[@ChrisPBacon777]

Zero delay? Not quite. There's about a 1.6s delay for a radio signal to trash the moon. That delay can be clearly heard in the comms.

[@appletongallery]

The entire “mission” was scripted beforehand. It’s a movie script for a movie.

[@ChrisPBacon777]

@@appletongallery it's easy to make up any old thing. What is asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.